Swca Environmental Consultants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Final Adopted September 8, 2011 City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design in association with Fehr & Peers and Eisen | Letunic San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Acknowledgements C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Matt Grocott, Chair Judi Mosqueda, Vice Chair Naomi Patridge Karyl Matsumoto Cory Roay Ken Ibarra Marge Colapietro Ian Bain Paul Grantham Steve Schmidt Frank Markowitz David Alfano Cathleen Baker Cathy Baylock Former Members Joel Slavit Julie Lancelle Lucy Wicks We wish to thank staff from the following agencies who contributed to this plan: Town of Atherton, City of Belmont, City of Brisbane, City of Burlingame, Town of Colma, City of Daly City, City of East Palo Alto, City of Foster City, City of Half Moon Bay, Town of Hillsborough, City of Menlo Park, City of Millbrae, City of Pacifica, Town of Portola Valley, City of Redwood City, City of San Bruno, City of San Carlos, City of San Mateo, City of South San Francisco, Town of Woodside, County of San Mateo, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Caltrans District 4, SamTrans, San Francisco International Airport, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, and City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. This page intentionally left blank. San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Table of Contents GLOSSARY AND LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ -
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education ............................................................................................................. -
Past, Present, and Future Tree Canopy Conditions in San Mateo County DRAFT
Page | 1 Past, Present, and Future Tree Canopy Conditions in San Mateo County DRAFT Prepared for the Tree Ordinances Steering Committee Page | 2 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Agents of Change .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Past Conditions ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Future Conditions due to Climate Change .................................................................................................. 13 Opportunities & Challenges ........................................................................................................................ 19 Appendix ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Works Cited ............................................................................................................................................. 21 Example Aerial Photos ............................................................................................................................ 23 -
Environmental Setting and Conservation Elements
Santa Cruz County Regional Conservation Investment Strategy DRAFT Environmental Setting and Conservation Elements November 2020 Contents List of Tables iv List of Figures iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Environmental Setting and Conservation Elements 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Land Use 5 Local Land Use 5 Jurisdictions 5 Land Use Designations 6 Planned Infrastructure and Development Projects 9 Existing Protected Lands 12 Conservation and Mitigation Banks 15 2.3 Existing Conservation Plans 17 Recovery Plans 17 Habitat Conservation Plans 19 Other Conservation Plans 23 2.4 Natural Environment 27 Ecoregions 27 Climate 27 Disturbance Regimes 29 Watersheds 30 Natural Communities and Other Land Cover 32 Aquatic Systems 37 Terrestrial Systems 38 2.5 Conservation Elements 44 Background 44 Approach to the Conservation Elements 44 Communities 48 Other Conservation Elements 52 Habitat Connectivity 52 SCCRTC and RCDSCC ii November 2020 Santa Cruz County Contents Regional Conservation Investment Strategy Working Lands 56 Focal Species 59 Non-Focal Species 60 Co-Benefited Species 63 2.6 Next Steps 74 References 75 Appendices 90 Appendix A: Glossary 90 Appendix B: GIS Data Sources 103 Appendix F: Infrastructure Plans and Projects 108 Appendix G: Species Database Compilation 123 SCCRTC and RCDSCC iii November 2020 Santa Cruz County Contents Regional Conservation Investment Strategy List of Tables Table 2-1: General Land Use Designations within each Jurisdiction 7 Table 2-2: Protected Lands in the RCIS Area 12 Table 2-3: Conservation and Mitigation Banks with a Service -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Nc
NPS Form 10-900 0MB No, 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts, See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How zo Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. if any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A''. for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and anm !lfrt!i~Cil'~ opJy categories and subcategories from the mstructJons. nC:vC. IV CU i:::'.'28Q 1. Name of Property MAY 6 2015 Historic name: X-100 Other names/site number: Nat. Regist er of Historic Places Name of related multiple p_r_o_p-ert_y_l-is-ti_n_g_:_N_A___________ N ati onal Parl\ Service (Enter "NI A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 1586 Lexington Avenue City or town: San Mateo State: ~C=a""'lii"'""·o""'r"""n""ia_____ County: San Mateo Not For Publication: D Vicinity: D 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this .L nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property -~- meets _,_ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national _statewide _!_local Applicable National Register Criteria: _A _B _LC _D State Historic Preservation Officer Signature of certifying official/Title: Date California Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property _meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria. -
RTC Agenda April 6, 2017 2
Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:00 a.m. NOTE LOCATION THIS MONTH County Board of Supervisors Chambers th 701 Ocean St., 5 floor Santa Cruz, CA NOTE See the last page for details about access for people with disabilities, translation services, and meeting broadcasts. En Español Para información sobre servicios de traducción al español, diríjase a la última página. AGENDAS ONLINE To receive email notification when the RTC meeting agenda packet is posted on our website, please call (831) 460-3200 or visit sccrtc.org/about/esubscriptions/ COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP Caltrans (ex-officio) Tim Gubbins City of Capitola Jacques Bertrand City of Santa Cruz Sandy Brown City of Scotts Valley Randy Johnson City of Watsonville Oscar Rios County of Santa Cruz Greg Caput County of Santa Cruz Ryan Coonerty County of Santa Cruz Zach Friend County of Santa Cruz John Leopold County of Santa Cruz Bruce McPherson Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Cynthia Chase Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Ed Bottorff Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Norm Hagen The majority of the Commission constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. SCCRTC Agenda April 6, 2017 2 1. Roll call 2. Oral communications Any member of the public may address the Commission on any item within the jurisdiction of the Commission that is not already on the agenda. The Commission will listen to all communication, but in compliance with State law, and may not take action on items that are not on the agenda. Speakers are requested to sign the sign-in sheet and state their name clearly so that their names can be accurately recorded in the minutes of the meeting. -
Appendices to Cotoni-Coast Dairies Planning Public Workshops
BLM Cotoni-Coast Dairies Planning Public Workshop Summary Report APPENDIX A | WORKSHOP NOTIFICATION MATERIALS BLM News Release https://www.blm.gov/press-release/blm-host-cotoni-coast-dairies-public-access- workshops December 2018 News Release Central California District For Immediate Release: November 8, 2018 CA-CC-18-59 Contact: Serena Baker, 916-941-3146, [email protected] BLM to host Cotoni-Coast Dairies public access workshops MARINA, Calif. – The Bureau of Land Management Central Coast Field Office will host two public workshops to explore recreational access opportunities at the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of the California Coastal National Monument in Santa Cruz County. The content and activities will be the same at both workshops: • Tuesday, Dec. 4, from 5 to 7 pm, Louden Nelson Community Center, 301 Center Street, Santa Cruz, CA. • Thursday, Dec. 13, from 5 to 7 pm, Bonny Doon Elementary School, 1492 Pine Flat Road, Santa Cruz, CA. The Cotoni-Coast Dairies property was donated to the BLM in 2014 and encompasses nearly 6,000 acres along Santa Cruz County’s North Coast. Access to the property is limited to guided tours currently. These workshops will provide an opportunity for the BLM to share information and gather feedback on options to expand access to the property. The Cotoni-Coast Dairies extends along the Pacific Coast Highway near Davenport. This property is marked by six forested perennial streams that flow from the Santa Cruz Mountains into the Pacific Ocean: Molino Creek, Agua Puerca Creek, San Vicente Creek, Liddell Creek, Yellow Bank Creek and Laguna Creek. Between these riparian drainages are broad marine terraces used for livestock grazing. -
QUIROSTE VALLEY QUIROSTE VALLEY Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future
Mountain Echo THE NEWSLETTER OF SEMPERVIRENS FUND FALL 2015 QUIROSTE VALLEY QUIROSTE VALLEY Learning from the past and looking to the future any people know Año Nuevo State Park For thousands of years the Quiroste (pronounced M for the famous elephant seals, but on the “Keer-osh-tee”) tribe inhabited this area, and in inland side of Highway One lies the Whitehouse 1769 it was at the Quiroste Valley village that Creek watershed with a rich and important history Gaspar de Portolá and his struggling expedition that is lesser known. If you follow Whitehouse to discover Monterey Bay made first contact with Creek from the ridgetop down to the sea, you pass the native people. The Quiroste people helped the through many distinct vegetation types, demon- visitors and guided them, leading to the expedition’s strating the diversity of this landscape — maritime eventual “discovery” of San Francisco Bay. chaparral, knobcone pine, coast redwood, coast live During the subsequent Mission Period, the oak, riparian, coastal scrub, grassland and coastal Quiroste and other tribes declined dramatically in sand dunes. The 6,000-acre watershed encompasses population and lost much of their culture due to the western portion of Big Basin Redwoods State disease and religious conversion. But today, through Park and the eastern portion of Año Nuevo. unique partnerships, Sempervirens Fund is working with the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, California State Parks, Girl Scouts of Northern California and UC Berkeley researchers to help restore the land where native people once flourished and renew native cultural understanding. In 2008, State Parks created the Quiroste Valley Cultural Preserve — a 225-acre area within Año Nuevo to “provide for the recognition and protection of its outstanding cultural resources, ancient heritage, and cultural identity” — and agreed to consult with native representatives to establish resource manage- ment practices and historical interpretation. -
Sempervirens Fund 2019 Impact Report
Sempervirens Fund Impact Report 2019 and Gazos Creek, our two newest redwood properties, fill ecologically critical gaps in our conservation network. With these new acquisitions, Sempervirens Fund owns 11,639 acres of magnificent, irreplaceable redwood forests. We protect Dear Friends the investment that you have made in these Opening the Robert C. Kirkwood Entrance to forests by working to improve their health Castle Rock State Park was the highlight of and resilience. In 2019, this meant restoring 2019 for Sempervirens Fund. Thanks to your native plants, removing invasive species, significant support and volunteerism, the monitoring wildlife, improving habitat condi- park now has a state-of-the-art entrance that tions, enhancing water quality, and reducing invites all to explore the redwoods and rock the risk of catastrophic wildfire. formations of the Santa Cruz Mountains. We What’s next? In 2020, we have some inno- anticipated that regular hikers and climbers vative forest restoration projects planned for would be pleased—and they are, giving it San Vicente Redwoods, a large, park-sized rave reviews. Less expected, but equally property that you helped us to protect. We wonderful, is that the entrance has spurred will be working to open publicly accessible the creation of programs that bring disadvan- trails on the property and we will continue to taged kids to experience nature and has seek new additions to our protected lands. inspired many to visit a state park for the first time. We are honored by your trust and appreciative of your ongoing support. More visitors to our parks, combined with more threats posed by climate change, makes With gratitude, it more important than ever that we expand the network of protected lands. -
Healthy Lands & Healthy Economies: Nature's Value in Santa Cruz County
HEALTHY LANDS & HEALTHY ECONOMIES: NATURE’S VALUE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HEALTHY LANDS & HEALTHY ECONOMIES: NATURE’S VALUE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY NATURE’S VALUE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY SUGGESTED CITATION Schmidt, R., Lozano, S., Robins, J., Schwartz, A., Batker, D., 2014. Nature’s Value in Santa Cruz County. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA & the Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County, Capitola, CA. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES • Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County • Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority • Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District Initiative team members include Sacha Lozano, Chris Coburn, and Karen Christensen (Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County); Andrea Mackenzie, Jake Smith, Matt Freeman, and Joelle Garretson (Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority); Karen Gaffney, Tom Robinson, Alex Roa, and Bill Keene (Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District) and Jim Robins of Alnus Ecological (Regional Coordinator). ECONOMIC ANALYSIS TECHNICAL PARTNER • Earth Economics FUNDING PARTNERS • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation • S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation • State Coastal Conservancy ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Initiative would like to thank Jim Robins of Alnus Ecological for providing excellent regional coordination and strategic input on the Healthy Lands & Healthy Economies Initiative, to Kate Goodnight of the State Coastal Conservancy for invaluable input and support, RCDSCC Board of Directors for their feedback and support, and the Earth Economics Board of Directors for their continued support and guidance: David Cosman, Josh Farley, and Ingrid Rasch. Thank you to all of our peer reviewers and to the organizations, agencies and individuals who contributed data, resources or other feedback, including Trish Chapman and Tom Gandesbery (California State Coastal Conservancy), Bryan Largay (Land Trust of Santa Cruz County), Gary Knoblock (The S.D. -
Ascension Heights
ASCENSION HEIGHTS FOR SALE 19 LOT SFD RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION І SAN MATEO, CA AFFILIATED BUSINESS DISCLOSURE benefit in determining whether you desire to including leases and other materials, in express further interest in the acquisition of summary form. These summaries may not be CBRE, Inc. operates within a global family of the Property, (ii) you will hold it in the strictest complete nor accurate descriptions of the full companies with many subsidiaries and related confidence, (iii) you will not disclose it or its agreements referenced. Additional information entities (each an “Affiliate”) engaging in a broad contents to any third party without the prior and an opportunity to inspect the Property range of commercial real estate businesses written authorization of the owner of the may be made available to qualified prospective including, but not limited to, brokerage services, Property (“Owner”) or CBRE, Inc., and (iv) you purchasers. You are advised to independently property and facilities management, valuation, will not use any part of this Memorandum in any verify the accuracy and completeness of investment fund management and development. manner detrimental to the Owner or CBRE, Inc. all summaries and information contained At times different Affiliates, including CBRE Global herein, to consult with independent legal and Investors, Inc. or Trammell Crow Company, may If after reviewing this Memorandum, you have financial advisors, and carefully investigate the have or represent clients who have competing no further interest in purchasing the Property, economics of this transaction and Property’s interests in the same transaction. For example, kindly return it to CBRE, Inc. suitability for your needs. -
Sempervirens Fund 2020 Impact Report
IMPACT REPORT 2020 To Our Steadfast Community, A generation ago, many long-term strategic plans were in development that referenced 2020 and the clarity of vision that would be achieved and realized by that magical year. Instead, 2020 was as unplanned as any year in recent memory. Throughout a worldwide health crisis, devastating wildfires, and civic and political upheaval, our community—all of you—came together, for redwoods and for each other. We have suffered great loss, and we’ve experienced steadfast resolve. We’ve been “Valley” and “Mountain” Strong. We’ve looked to the redwoods for solace, connection, and community, and for reflection on our own resilience. When I think about communities getting stronger in the face of adversity, I think about redwoods. A single coast redwood tree can live for thousands of years, bear the scars of numerous fires, be shaped by drought, weather torrential storms, and live on. Redwoods— like us—are strongest when connected, from roots to canopies, in a community of trees, facing the elements together. Despite the challenges and setbacks, we are stronger as an organization because of you. We made significant headway to protect new lands in the coming years and to prepare protected lands for public access and to be added to regional state parks. And we were virtually joined by thousands of new supporters in times of crisis. In this year’s impact report, we look back at a year shaped by events we never imagined and look ahead to a bright future, possible because of your support and care. We cannot wait to celebrate with you in the cool shade of a redwood grove again.