UNIT HISTORIES Regimental Histories and Personal Narratives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIT HISTORIES Regimental Histories and Personal Narratives # ^ ^ CIVIL WAR UNIT HISTORIES Regimental Histories and Personal Narratives -ir ik ik Part 2. The Union•IS ew England ^V ^L ^******** ^¡a V ^^ ^m •••••• ^*m^ ¿mr H ••••^^•A- ^^¿¿^ H ••*-•••• ^XST H•••••••• ^ iv i^ iv - - •-• • '•• ; • - '•- • V ''s-i-p^-'^ï '."' '"' •4x ''•^- A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of CIVIL WAR UNIT HISTORIES Regimental Histories and Personal Narratives Part 2. The Union•New England Project Editor: Robert E. Lester Guide compiled by Blair D. Hydrick A microfiche project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Civil War unit histories, [microform] Accompanied by printed guides compiled by Blair D. Hydrick. Contents: pt. 1. The Confederate States of America and border states - pt. 2. The Union -- New England. 1. United States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865-- J Regimental histories. 2. United States-History- j Civil War, 1861-1865~Personal narratives. ' I. Lester, Robert. II. Hoag, Gary. IM. Hydrick, Blair. E492 973.7'42 92-17394 Copyright© 1993 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-259-9. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction v Scope and Content Note xiii Arrangement of Material xvi' List of Contributing Institutions xix Source Note xxi Editorial Note xxi Fiche Index Connecticut CT-1 Maine • ME-11 Massachusetts MA-19 New Hampshire NH-53 Rhode Island R|-61 Vermont VT-73 Author Index AI-79 Major Engagements Index ME-85 m INTRODUCTION Nothing in the annals of America remotely compares with the Civil War. To historian Allan Nevins, it was "a struggle for the future of humanity." The distin- guished British analyst D.W. Brogan termed the conflict "the most moving, inter- esting, dignified thing that ever occurred in America." Without question, the Civil War was the turning point on the country's history. On its outcome hinged the perpetuation of the nation, slavery versus freedom, and the maintenance of majority rule in American democracy. It was a "strange sad war" to poet-nurse Walt Whitman, but the majority of eyewitnesses saw the North-South conflict as the most exciting and memorable event in their lives.The very nature of the Civil War lends itself to perpetual fascination. As historian Richard B. Harwell stated: It is a convenient war. It has a beginning and an end. Its causes stretch back to the beginning of our national life and its influences are still with us, but 1861-1865 is a tangible period. It was a war in which the same language was spoken on both sides and which, therefore, can be studied by one not trained in languages. It was a war in which the participants understood the ideology of one another (perhaps betterthan it has been understood since). T. Harry Williams, one of the foremost authorities on the conflict of the 1860s, added: A real good hearty war like that dies hard. No country likes to part with a good earnest war. It likes to talk about the war, write its history, fight its battles over and over again, and build monument after monument to commemorate its glories. Mid-nineteenth century America was a lusty, growing nation that created both the war and the armies that fought it. For the three million volunteer soldiers involved, the Civil War exceeded their wildest expectations about life. A majority of those men were farmers who had literally never been out of sight of their homes prior to the 1861 bombardment of Fort Sumter. An even larger number left for war fully convinced that the contest between the North and South would be brief and comparatively bloodless. No one at the beginning had the faintest thought that the Civil War would last four wrenching years, or that the seven hundred thousand fatalities it produced would make it the most traumatic event in the nation's history. Indeed, more Americans perished in the Civil War than in all of our other wars combined. These deaths were not in vain. The Civil War's impact on American life is all but incalculable. One can argue easily that everything from the debates of the Founding Fathers to the events of today have a strong and direct relationship with the struggle of the 1860s. Enchantment with the war has not ceased; if anything, it has grown with each passing decade. Continued interest has sparked continued examination, which in turn has uncovered more facts and insights. The result has been to make the four-year conflagration between Union and Confederacy the most documented of all of America's wars. Military historians are inclined to preach how the good general inspires his troops. In the Civil War, the reverse was often true; a general was only as good as the men he led. While Billy Yanks and Johnny Rebs left a good deal to be desired as disciplined soldiers, they proved beyond doubt and for all time their prowess as determined fighters. Much of the mass of information about that war fortunately comes from those men in the ranks. Like soldiers in any war, they existed in all their unsophisticated variety, and if their voices at times sound confusing, it is principally because they spoke with many voices. Some were writing letters and keeping diaries from the date of their enlistments. Even before the bloody conflict came to an end, others were penning memoirs and compiling regimental histories. As veterans aged in the tranquility of postwar years, hundreds of them devoted indeterminable hours to reminiscences and unit studies. The nation-building war had been so sweeping, so awesome, that men and events had to be preserved in print. What eventually appeared were more firsthand accounts of men in battle than exist for any other war ever fought. This unprecedented collection of material by the Civil War's common soldiers is a wondrous testimonial not only to the gallantry of those soldiers but equally so to their sense of history. The existence of so much writing might well be called providential in that American soldiers of the 1860s were more educated than their counterparts in Europe; larger numbers returned home and were able to relate their stories; the majority of them experienced much to tell. Ink and paper survive with a peculiar freshness. The words of Civil War soldiers re-create their era with an immediacy and revelation that, six score and ten years later, bring a new understanding of the indivisible nation and the warthat made it so. Historical Perspectives Several attributes should be understood as an introduction to this splendid collection. What will be readily apparent in the writings of the Civil War soldiers is the imbalance in quantity between northern and southern works. This is natural, considering the relative numbers involved, the higher percentage of Federal survivors, the northern superiority in finances and facilities, and the postwar subjugation of southern states horribly ravaged by battle and want. This wide gap in published studies is most evident in unit histories. New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania have book-length works for practically every one of their Civil War regiments. Before 1920, in contrast, Mississippi could not boast of any unit history, Arkansas had one, Georgia only two. Virginia and North Carolina alone among the former Confederate states kept reasonable pace with the states to the north. Today that disparity in publi- cations is steadily becoming less, but the catch-up process will still require many years to achieve any degree of parity. VI Another element in Civil War narratives is sectional prejudice. The bitterness left by the war was slow to die. Well into this century, some potentially good accounts suffered fatally from regional biases and personal resentments. Northern writers often exhibited the complex of a conqueror; the result was compilations that belittled or defamed the land of their opponents and every- thing in it. Billy Yanks began penning reminiscences during the war. By the end of the century, they had lost momentum and interest. Time often did not have a chance to exercise its mellowing effects on their judgments. In contrast, fewer than half a dozen memoirs by Johnny Rebs appeared in the war years. The bulk of Confed- erate memoirs emerged a quarter-century later and benefited from calmer thinking. Writings by the men of blue and grey cannot be lumped into one general category. Each title must be classified by time and by content. Historians know that the trustworthiness of a memoir is directly related to when it appeared. The more elapsed time there is between the events and the recording of them, the less dependable the narrative tends to be. Professional researchers traditionally put all Civil War eyewitness accounts into one of three types: (1 ) the immediate witness, who wrote soon after the events; (2) the secon- dary witness who, motivated by what he or she considered necessary, desirable, or profitable, penned an account twenty years or so later; and (3) the subsequent witness, a goodly number of whom had interest sparked and memory refreshed by the publication in 1880-1901 of the War Department's massive Official Records. Any student of Civil War history must treat the above classifications differently. One cannot give the same measure of acceptance to the second two that is attached naturally to the first. "Time is of the very essence of reliability in reminiscences," bibliographer E. Merton Coulter once stated, "but as few people feel in the reminiscent mood until many years have elapsed since the event, there is constant danger that a treacherous memory will produce distortion of past events." Douglas Southall Freeman was always suspicious of Civil War reminiscences penned many years after the conflict, for the veteran always "adorns his story with every telling, until it becomes exceedingly difficult to ascertain the fabric of fact that underlies the embroidery of fancy." Fellow historian C.
Recommended publications
  • Index to Black Horse Cavalry Defend Our Beloved Country, by Lewis Marshall Helm
    Index to Black Horse Cavalry Defend Our Beloved Country, by Lewis Marshall Helm http://innopac.fauquiercounty.gov/record=b1117236 Index courtesy of Fauquier County Public Library (http://fauquierlibrary.org) Name Subject Page Abel, Charles T. a prisoner dies of illness 225 Abel, Charles T. BH brief biography / service record 263 Abel, George W. enlists with BH 67 Abel, George W. was captured and sent to Old Capitol Prison 140 Abel, George W. BH brief biography / service record 263 Abell, Charles T. Gerardis captured Alexander in Culpeper sold it to Gen. 172 Abingdon Washington 15 Accotink Run BH engages Union troops 62 Payne memo, speculates on Jackson had Achilles he lived in the past 301 Adams (Mr.) Turner diary mentions 100 see also Slaves and Negros (terms were African Americans indexed as they appeared in the text) African-Americans Mosby blamed for support of 248 home state of Private Wilburn relative of Alabama Robert Smith 245 Albemarle Cavalry diarist describes 41 Albemarle County Union sends in cavalry raids 192 Aldie Turner describes Union advance toward 145 Aldie Stuart's cavalry fights around 164 Aldie road "guide" claims Jackson is moving along 116 sold Alexander home, Abingdon, to Gen. Alexander, Gerard Washington 15 family settled along banks of Potomac in Alexander, John IV 1659 15 Alexander, Mark hijinks w/William Payne 3 Alexandria is being bombarded, topic of chapter 14, 15 Alexandria Artillery is formed and attracts volunteers 15 Alexandria Light Artillery fires first round 30 Alexandria Light Artillery takes out Cub Run bridge 35 Alexandria Pike BH does picket duty along 13 Alexandria Railroad trains are commandeered 19 Alexandria Rifles Alexander Hunter is transferred to BH 160 Alexandria Sentinel issues call to arms 15 Alexandria Turnpike its importance is noted 4 Alexandria Turnpike Jackson to arrive at 104 Alexandria Turnpike section from Waterloo to Amissville 153 Name Subject Page Allen (Col.) Payne memo, recalls attack let by 298 Alrich Union moves toward Richmond from 200 Alston, Harold exchanged from Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN MANHOOD in the CIVIL WAR ERA a Dissertation Submitted
    UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael E. DeGruccio _________________________________ Gail Bederman, Director Graduate Program in History Notre Dame, Indiana July 2007 UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA Abstract by Michael E. DeGruccio This dissertation is ultimately a story about men trying to tell stories about themselves. The central character driving the narrative is a relatively obscure officer, George W. Cole, who gained modest fame in central New York for leading a regiment of black soldiers under the controversial General Benjamin Butler, and, later, for killing his attorney after returning home from the war. By weaving Cole into overlapping micro-narratives about violence between white officers and black troops, hidden war injuries, the personal struggles of fellow officers, the unbounded ambition of his highest commander, Benjamin Butler, and the melancholy life of his wife Mary Barto Cole, this dissertation fleshes out the essence of the emergent myth of self-made manhood and its relationship to the war era. It also provides connective tissue between the top-down war histories of generals and epic battles and the many social histories about the “common soldier” that have been written consciously to push the historiography away from military brass and Lincoln’s administration. Throughout this dissertation, mediating figures like Cole and those who surrounded him—all of lesser ranks like major, colonel, sergeant, or captain—hem together what has previously seemed like the disconnected experiences of the Union military leaders, and lowly privates in the field, especially African American troops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Middleburg and the Fight at Goose Creek Bridge
    "The Sentinel" September 2020 Newsletter of The James Creek Guards "Clubs Are Trump!" This Month: 1. The Battle of Middleburg and The Fight At Goose Creek Bridge 2. New Proposed Drill Event!! 3. Levi Fritz Letter 4. From The Desk Of The President 5. Upcoming Events 6. The Civil War Merchant I am always looking for newsletter content, so please forward your 7. Event Schedule articles, book reviews, event summaries/photos, stories, 53rd memories, rd etc. to me for inclusion in a future edition of “The Sentinel”. Matthew 8. 53 PVI Contact Info Steger, editor The Battle of Middleburg and the fight at goose creek bridge By Dan Welch – posted on nps.gov Explosion of a Rebel Limber at the Battle near Middleburg, June 21, 1863, by Alfred Waud (Library of Congress) The fighting on June 19, 1863, at Middleburg, Virginia, and the movements of Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart’s Confederate cavalry during the following day, led Army of the Potomac cavalry commander, Maj. Gen. Alfred Pleasonton, to believe that Stuart’s cavalry was supported by infantry. Because of this, Pleasonton requested infantry to support his mounted command. The request was approved and orders were filtered down the chain of command. The assignment fell to Brig. Gen. James Barnes’s division of the Federal Fifth Corps, which was Page 1 of 9 “The Sentinel” The newsletter of the 53rd Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry marched toward Middleburg. The scene was now set for yet another day of fighting in the Loudoun Valley all due to the Army of the Potomac’s push to gather intelligence on the movements and intentions of the Army of Northern Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Genealogy of the Stackpole Family
    Jl o o o o HISTORY AND GENEALOGY OF THE STACKPOLE FAMILY BY EVERETT S. STACKPOLE SECOND EDITION 1920 a- . A THE WEF yn^^ PUBLIC J.,! BR A RV ' ux'-^:'^-e . ASTOB, LEN:*^ ^,;j 'TILDEK F ''DaHo..\:s| 1* Journal Printshop and Bindery Lewiston, Maine CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Origin "7 42 II. Stacpole Family in Ireland III. The Coat of Arms 52 IV. James Stacpole, the Emigrant 54 V. The Old Farm 65 VI. Second Generation 75 VII. Third Generation 87 VIII. Fourth Generation 95 IX. Fifth Generation 115 X. Sixth Generation 160 XI. Seventh Generation 264 XII. Eighth Generation 304 XIII. The Stackpoles of Pennsylvania 306 XIV. Later Arrivals 314 XV. Military Record 319 XVI. College Alumni 335 XVII. Reunions 337 Index 339 ILLUSTRATIONS The Stack Rock Frontispiece Stackpole Court Opposite page 10 Sir Richard de Stakepol 15 Church of Stackpole-Elidyr 21 Sir Elidyr de Stakepol 22 Wife of Sir Elidyr de Stakepol 22 The Eight-Arch Bridge . 29 Approach to Stackpole Court 38 Post Office at Stackpole, Wales 40 John Stacpoole of Cragbrien 47 Edenvale, Ennis, County Clare, Ireland 49 Coat of Arms 52 House of James Stacpole, 1680 58 The Old Farm 69 Stackpole Memorial 72 Where Our Ancestors Lived 74 William Stackpole 127 David Dunning Stackpole 140 Samuel Owen Stackpole 144 Lorenzo Stackpole 194 Annie W. Baer 194 Joseph Lewis Stackpole 205 John Ward Gurley Stackpole 207 William Stackpole 236 Rev. Charles Henry Stackpole 237 Everett S. Stackpole 239 Alice Aberdein 244 Nellie S. Stackpole 258 Charles Harper Stackpole 277 George Dallas Stackpole 278 Joseph Lewis Stackpole 295 Joseph Lewis Stackpole 296 George F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • Narttrmaster-~Entrai I
    ANNUAL REPORT AND ~cting ~narttrmaster-~entraI I OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF M.A:SSACHUSJiITTS, FOR THE YEAR E~mING DECEMBER 31, 1860. "'VtJ BOSTON: WILLIAM WHITE, PRINTER TO THE STATE. 1860. , BLIO DOCUMENT ..... .. .... No. 15. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ADJUTANT­ -~ \} AND ~ t tin g ~ uart er mas t£ r -~ en er 'nI OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, F OR THE YEAR ENDL.'W DECEMBER 31, 1860. ;' c .. ~' /, .. ~ ~ : '- f : l":. "r : 'f ,\ ~ lot. 'e " • (' r t" '" C '-.. ~ t"'O l 4. C It t' .. t. '- ... co .. "' .. ~ '- , C'" '- I. • C' • .. (' ... , r" f" r • I f r f ". f • fl ' " •• (,-. __-.:. ~·r ~ . (~ .. 'f' '- BOSTON: WILLLUI WIDTE, PRINTER TO THE STATE. 1860. "TON 366. (; M 3 A ;1.,,31\; ) ?fCc 0 :B QIolllmonrocaltlJ of jl1a5saclJu5c1tS. ADJUTANT-GENERAL'g OFFICE, BOSTO~, 1 December 31, 1860. ~ To His Excellency N. P. BANKS, Governo1' and Commander­ in- Chief. SIR,-I have the honor to submit to your Excellency the Report of tlie Adjutant and Acting Quartermaster-General's departments, for the year ending December 31, 1860. With the highest respect, I have the hOllor to be, Your Excellency's ob't servant, WM. SCHODLER, Adjutant and Acting Quartermaster- General. 4 ADJUTANT-GE~ERAL'S REPORT. [Jan. ANNU AL REPORT. ADJUTANT-GENERA.L'S OFFICE, BOSTON, I December 31, 1860. ~ To His Excellency N. P. BA.NKS, Governor ood Commandet·­ in- Chief. Sm,-Chapter 13, section 64, of the General Statutes of the Commonwealth provides that the Adjutant-General shall be "Acting Quartermaster-General and keeper of the public magazines, munitions of war, entrenching tools, and other implements of war belonging to the Commonwealth." Section 27, of the same chapter, provides that he shall be" Inspector­ General of the Militia." In accordance with these and other provisions of law, I have the honor to submit to your Excellency the following Report, which shows the present state of the militia, the condition of the military property of the Commonwealth, and the amount and character of the duties performed by the active volunteer force during the year ending December 31, 1860.
    [Show full text]
  • March 13,1866
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Portland Daily Press, 1866 Portland Daily Press 3-13-1866 Portland Daily Press: March 13,1866 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/pdp_1866 Recommended Citation "Portland Daily Press: March 13,1866" (1866). Portland Daily Press, 1866. 60. https://digitalmaine.com/pdp_1866/60 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Portland Daily Press at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Portland Daily Press, 1866 by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. l W v.,' «Tr • Tx „,,M ,,,, J ——————— ■■ Ml —■■■■■■ — ... ———— «pi .-[ ====a==3^g===^^^————.f June 1862. Vol. 5. TUESDAY MARCH 1866. Established 23, PORTLAND) MQ-KiNIJNCi, 13, Terms $8 per annum, in advance. vi.\ r>: .v w •. ___■ •*. 'li/i 1 ■■ ^^i——• THE PORTLAND DAILY PRESS t» Street, Business Miscellaneous. Miscellaneous. Lost and Found. For on 82 Exchange Notices. Wants, Sale and to Let. y their own every day, (Sunday excepted,(at -■>— political destruction. The N. A. Proprietor. L Portland, Foster, DAILY e«P-scated, earnest in advance. convictions of the Terms : —Eight Dollar? a year PRESS, *** people Wanted. For Sale. ^ * POBTLAND. aE1(l the man who sets himself in at Copartnership. JUST RECEIVED Agent in every town in the State of Maine to PRESS, to the The Farm known as the opposition to THE MAINE STATE EASTMAN BROTHERS sell a convenient and formerly no matter at''“Risked £2.00 a AN new, useful patented arti- Small them, how exalted his same p!aco every Thursday morning year, George Farm, in the town of undersigned have this day formed a copart- Have received an entire new lot ot -AT TUE- cle.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Design Guidelines
    City of Franklin Historic District Design Guidelines Franklin, Louisiana 2011 Acknowledgments The Franklin Design Guidelines Manual was revised in 2011 to assist property owners and the Historic District Commission and to guide appropriate rehabilitation, new construction, and other improvements within the city's local historic district. The resulting Historic District Design Guidelines manual was completed in cooperation with the City of Franklin Office of Community Development. Franklin City Council Franklin Historic District Commission, 2011 Judith Allain, Chairwoman Raymond Harris, Jr. Mayor Heloise LeBlanc, Co-Chairwoman Lester Levine Jr. Mayor Protempore - At Large Edward Delone Dale Rogers Councilman District A Glenn Todd Ella P. Hamilton Chuck Autin Councilman District B Ben Nash Eugene Foulcard Councilman District C Adriane Kramer Evans Joseph H. Garrison Councilman District D Roger Stouff Vincent Borne, Attorney Lesley Woods, Secretary Blake Steiner, City Inspector (Planning & Zoning) P.O. Box 121225, Nashville, TN 37212 City of Franklin Historic District Design Guidelines i Table of Contents Design Guidelines and Historic Preservation………………………………………………………………………....1 Historic Preservation and Sustainability………………………………………………………………………………….4 A Brief History of Franklin……………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Franklin’s Architectural Styles……………………………………………………………………………………...………..8 Residential Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..18 Architectural Features……………………………………………………………………………………………....20 Awnings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….22
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya
    Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Heritage National Atchafalaya COMMISSION REVIEW- October 1, 2010 Vol. I SEPTEMBER 2011 Environmental Assessment Environmental Management Plan Note: This is a low resolution file of the painting, “Hope” to show artwork and placement. Artwork will be credited to Melissa Bonin, on inside front cover. AtchafalayaAtchafalaya NationalNational HeritageHeritage AreaArea MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEPT DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Front cover photo credit: Louisiana Office of Tourism NPS ABF/P77/107232 SEPTEMBER 2011 Printed on recycled paper July 1, 2011 Dear Stakeholders: I am pleased to present the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Management Plan and Environmental Assessment developed by the Atchafalaya Trace Commission. The Plan is a model of collaboration among public agencies and private organizations. It proposes an integrated and cooperative approach for projects that will protect, interpret and enhance the natural, scenic, cultural, historical and recreational resources of the Atchafalaya National Heritage Area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • T Camp Meigs, READVILLE, M.VM MASS
    CIVIL WAR CAMPS AT READVILLE CAMP MEIGS PLAYGROUND & FOWL MEADOW RESERVATION VoL. PRELIMINARY HISTORIC DATA COMPILATION Cant oF t Camp Meigs, READVILLE, M.VM MASS. Sr 0 47c r i )1; CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRANI W. A. Stokinger A. K. Schroeder Captain A. A. Swanson RESERVATIONS & HISTORIC SITES METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION 20 SOMERSET STREET BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS April 1990 ABSTRACT Camp Meigs or the Camp at Readville was the most heavily used of the approximately thirty-nine Civil War training grounds established by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for the processing of Massachusetts Volunteer Militia (MVM) troops for induction into Federal service. Situated adjacent to the Neponset river on a site historically used for militia musters in what was the town of Dedham (now Hyde Park), a camp of rendezvous was first founded near the Readville railroad junction in July 1861 and remained in active service through early 1866. This camp supported over time the Commonwealth's primary training cantonment and a general hospital. During those Civil War years the Readville camps processed and trained at least 29,000 of the 114,000 men who served in the units raised by the Commonwealth. Thus, approximately a quarter of all men serving under Massachusetts state colors passed through Readville on their way to war. Preliminary research also indicates that of the 135 discrete, independently operating MVM organizations sanctioned and trained by the Commonwealth, Readville's graduates were allocated into at least 54 units, or forty percent of all MVM establishments, comprising: Nineteen of the Commonwealth's sixty-six camp trained MVM Infantry regiments.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam. Frederic Walker Lincoln
    LINCOLN ROOM UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY MEMORIAL the Class of 1901 founded by HARLAN HOYT HORNER and HENRIETTA CALHOUN HORNER 1[n flDcnionam ^^^.^/^ IFn flDemonam Frederic Walker Lincoln BOSTON I'K I VATK I.V I'l! I N TK I) 1 s '.I ;) flocktotll ana il'burcbill i'rcss BOSTON p AT the earnest solicitation of friends the following col- lection of facts, incidents, and thoughts has been compiled, with the hope that it mav help to perpetuate my father's influence and memory, in showing to others the high principles which alwavs governed his actions and made his life such a complete and useful one. It falls far short, however, of what it ought to be, to faithfiilly portray his thoroughly unselfish character. There are no records of the dailv acts of kindness and readv svmpathv which he bestowed upon those with whom he came in contact, which made for him innumerable friends and endeared him to people from all ranks in life. It was the fbrgetfulness of self that enabled him to be never wearv in well doing ; and trust in his Heavenlv Father gave him the strength to fulfil his duties. MARY KNIGHT LINCOLN. Rrookline, i8qq. (5) BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH : FREDERIC WALKER LINCOLN. Frederic Walker Lincoln was born in Boston, in a house on Hanover street, the twenty-seventh day of Febraar\', 1817, and baptized July 27 in the same year, by Llenry Ware, Jr., then commencing his ministry to the Second Church, of which Mr, Lincoln was all his life a member and active worker. He came from sound Puritan stock, being a descendant of Samuel Lincoln, one of the early settlers of the town of Hinghara, Mass., in 1637.
    [Show full text]