Wnt/-Catenin Signaling in Tissue Self-Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wnt/-Catenin Signaling in Tissue Self-Organization G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Tissue Self-Organization Kelvin W. Pond 1,*, Konstantin Doubrovinski 2 and Curtis A. Thorne 1 1 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; [email protected] 2 Green Center for Systems Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020; Published: 14 August 2020 Abstract: Across metazoans, animal body structures and tissues exist in robust patterns that arise seemingly out of stochasticity of a few early cells in the embryo. These patterns ensure proper tissue form and function during early embryogenesis, development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Fundamental questions are how these patterns are generated and maintained during tissue homeostasis and regeneration. Though fascinating scientists for generations, these ideas remain poorly understood. Today, it is apparent that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays a central role in tissue patterning. Wnt proteins are small diffusible morphogens which are essential for cell type specification and patterning of tissues. In this review, we highlight several mechanisms described where the spatial properties of Wnt/β-catenin signaling are controlled, allowing them to work in combination with other diffusible molecules to control tissue patterning. We discuss examples of this self-patterning behavior during development and adult tissues’ maintenance. The combination of new physiological culture systems, mathematical approaches, and synthetic biology will continue to fuel discoveries about how tissues are patterned. These insights are critical for understanding the intricate interplay of core patterning signals and how they become disrupted in disease. Keywords: Wnt; β-catenin; tissue patterning; tissue homeostasis; tissue organization; self-organization; reaction-diffusion; morphogens 1. The Wnt/β-catenin Pathway The Wnt pathway is a highly conserved cell-to-cell signaling pathway, appearing in metazoans from sponges [1] to nematodes [2] to chordates [3]. Wnt signaling plays essential roles in development, maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and regeneration of damaged tissue. After its role in Drosophila patterning and mouse tumor formation was discovered 40 years ago [4,5], Wnt has been extensively studied in virtually all model biological systems and continues to provide both basic biological insights and clues relevant to animal form, function, and disease. In this review, we will focus on the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway as a tissue organizing and self-organizing factor during embryogenesis/development and regeneration/homeostasis. For more general reviews on patterning and self-organization, the reader should also consider References [6–8]. β-catenin-independent Wnt pathways also exist, yet their activity has been less extensively studied in the context of tissue organization and patterning. For reviews on β-catenin-independent Wnt signaling, we refer the reader to References [9–12]. In the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Figure1), cells not receiving extracellular Wnt ligands maintain an active cytosolic destruction complex, which serves to degrade the continually expressed transcriptional co-activator β-catenin. The core components of the destruction complex consist of Axin, Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), casein kinase 1 α (CK1α), glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), protein phosphatase 2A (PP2a), and the ubiquitin ligase βTrCP. Axin and APC bind β-catenin, which is Genes 2020, 11, 939; doi:10.3390/genes11080939 www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Genes 2020, 11, 939 2 of 18 Genes 2020, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 18 phosphorylated by CK1α and GSK3, exposing the βTrCP ubiquitin target site on β-catenin [13] and catenin, which is phosphorylated by CK1α and GSK3, exposing the βTrCP ubiquitin target site on β- leading to proteasomal degradation. This maintains low cytosolic levels of β-catenin in the absence of catenin [13] and leading to proteasomal degradation. This maintains low cytosolic levels of β-catenin a Wnt ligand. Upon binding of extracellular Wnt to the membrane receptors Frizzled and low-density in the absence of a Wnt ligand. Upon binding of extracellular Wnt to the membrane receptors Frizzled lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (Lrp6), Dishevelled is recruited and promotes inhibition and and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (Lrp6), Dishevelled is recruited and promotes possiblyinhibition disassembly and possibly of APC,disassembl Axin,y and of APC, GSK3. Axin, With and the GSK3. destruction With the complex destruction function complex suppressed, function β -cateninsuppressed, accumulates β-catenin and accumulates translocates and to translocates the nucleus to to the promote nucleus expression to promote of Wntexpression target genes.of Wnt β -catenintarget genes. target β-catenin genes are target transcribed genes are through transcribed cooperation through with cooperation several other with nuclearseveral other factors nuclear [14], includingfactors [14], the T-cellincluding factor the (TCF) T-cell transcription factor (TCF) factor, transcription which switches factor, roleswhich from switches a repressor roles from to an a activatorrepressor (reviewed to an activator in Reference (reviewed [15]). This in transcriptionReference [15]). program This initiatestranscription a downstream program cascade initiates of a eventsdownstream that can cascade drive proliferation, of events that di canfferentiation, drive prolif anderation, renewal differentiation, of the stem cellsand renewal [16], among of the other stem outcomescells [16], [17 among]. other outcomes [17]. FigureFigure 1. General1. General model model for the for Wnt the/β -cateninWnt/β-catenin signaling signaling pathway pathway and its regulation and its byregulation the destruction by the complex.destruction The destructioncomplex. The complex: destruction Axin, Adenomatouscomplex: Axin, polyposis Adenomatous coli (APC), polyposis casein kinase coli (APC), 1 α (CK1 caseinα), glycogenkinase 1 synthase α (CK1α kinase), glycogen 3 (GSK3), synthase protein kinase phosphatase 3 (GSK3), 2A protein (PP2a), phosphatase and the ubiquitin 2A (PP2a), ligase βandTrCP. the Membraneubiquitin receptors:ligase βTrCP. Frizzled Membrane (FZD) receptors: and low-density Frizzled lipoprotein (FZD) and receptor-related low-density lipoprotein protein 6 receptor- (Lrp6). Dishevelledrelated protein (Dvl) 6 T-cell (Lrp6). factor Dishevelled (TCF). (Dvl) T-cell factor (TCF). 2.2. Tissue Tissue Self-Organization Self-Organization TheThe ability ability of of a a single single cell cell to to give give rise rise to to the the complexity complexity of of a a multicellular multicellular organism organism has has fascinated fascinated scientistsscientists for for generations. generations. In In 1892, 1892, Hans Hans Dreisch Dreisch separated separated sea sea urchin urchin embryos embryos at at the the 4-cell 4-cell stage stage and and discovereddiscovered that that all all separated separated cells cells were were able able to to di differentiatefferentiate into into complete complete larvae larvae (Die (Die Biologie Biologie als als selbstständigeselbstständige Wissenschaft Wissenschaft (1893)). (1893)). This This raised raised the question,the question, what what keeps keeps the intact the 4-cellintact embryo4-cell embryo from givingfrom risegiving to fourrise to complete four complete larvae? larvae? Dreisch’s Dreisch’ discoverys discovery was critical was critical as it showed as it showed that a that cell’s a fatecell’s dependsfate depends on the externalon the external (in this case(in this inhibitory) case inhibi signalingtory) signaling from proximity from orproximity contact withor contact its neighbors. with its Thisneighbors. was also This a keystone was also discovery a keystone because discovery it showed because that early it showed cells are that autonomous early cells units are thatautonomous contain allunits the informationthat contain needed all the toinformation self-organize needed themselves to self-organize into complex themselves functional into tissues. complex functional tissues. Tissue self-organization is a key aspect of animal development and adult tissue homeostasis. We define self-organization as the process by which tissues can form patterns from an initial symmetrical Genes 2020, 11, 939 3 of 18 Tissue self-organization is a key aspect of animal development and adult tissue homeostasis. We define self-organization as the process by which tissues can form patterns from an initial symmetrical or chaotic state. Self-organization can be driven by diffusible molecules, cell–cell or cell–substrate signaling, and mechanical forces. These triggers allow cells to “sense” their neighbors and environment to adjust proliferation, growth, differentiation, death, etc., accordingly, to insure robust and uniform development, regeneration, and homeostasis. Cell adhesion-based signaling is also essential to tissue organization. For example, the mechanosensing transcription factor YAP is required for the initial symmetry breaking events seen in organoids [18] and crypt formation is also driven by the activity of integrins during gut development [19]. For excellent reviews on adhesion and tissue organization, we refer the reader to References [20–23]. Tissue self-organizing events can be separated into two categories: embryogenesis/body
Recommended publications
  • Wnt Signalling During Limb Development
    Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46: 927-936 (2002) Wnt signalling during limb development VICKI L. CHURCH and PHILIPPA FRANCIS-WEST* Department of Craniofacial Development, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK ABSTRACT Wnts control a number of processes during limb development - from initiating outgrowth and controlling patterning, to regulating cell differentiation in a number of tissues. Interactions of Wnt signalling pathway components with those of other signalling pathways have revealed new mechanisms of modulating Wnt signalling, which may explain how different responses to Wnt signalling are elicited in different cells. Given the number of Wnts that are expressed in the limb and their ability to induce differential responses, the challenge will be to dissect precisely how Wnt signalling is regulated and how it controls limb development at a cellular level, together with the other signalling pathways, to produce the functional limb capable of co- ordinated precise movements. KEY WORDS: Wnt, limb, development, chondrogenesis, myogenesis The Wnt Gene Family is found in the others (Cadigan and Nusse, 1997). The frizzled receptors can function together with the LRP co-receptors, which The Wnt family of secreted glycosylated factors consists of 22 are single transmembrane proteins containing LDL receptor re- members in vertebrates which have a range of functions during peats, two frizzled motifs and four EGF type repeats in the development from patterning individual structures to fine tuning at extracellular domain (reviewed by Pandur and Kühl, 2001; also see a cellular level controlling cell differentiation, proliferation and Roszmusz et al., 2001). The LRPs, which include the vertebrate survival. The founding members of this family are the Drosophila genes LRP4, -5 and -6 and the Drosophila gene arrow, form a segment polarity gene Wingless (Wg), required for wing develop- complex with frizzled in a Wnt-dependent manner and signal in the ment, together with Wnt1 (originally named int-1) in the mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Endochondral Skeleton
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Development of the Endochondral Skeleton Fanxin Long1,2 and David M. Ornitz2 1Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 2Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Correspondence: fl[email protected] SUMMARY Much of the mammalian skeleton is composed of bones that originate from cartilage templates through endochondral ossification. Elucidating the mechanisms that control endochondral bone development is critical for understanding human skeletal diseases, injury response, and aging. Mouse genetic studies in the past 15 years have provided unprecedented insights about molecules regulating chondrocyte formation, chondrocyte maturation, and osteoblast differ- entiation, all key processes of endochondral bone development. These include the roles of the secreted proteins IHH, PTHrP, BMPs, WNTs, and FGFs, their receptors, and transcription factors such as SOX9, RUNX2, and OSX, in regulating chondrocyte and osteoblast biology. This review aims to integrate the known functions of extracellular signals and transcription factors that regulate development of the endochondral skeleton. Outline 1 Introduction 5 Osteoblastogenesis 2 Mesenchymal condensation 6 Closing remarks 3 Chondrocyte differentiation References 4 Growth plate development Editors: Patrick P.L. Tam, W. James Nelson, and Janet Rossant Additional Perspectives on Mammalian Development available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008334 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013;5:a008334 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press F.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Limb Development
    REVIEW published: 28 February 2017 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00014 Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Limb Development Cheryll Tickle 1* and Matthew Towers 2* 1 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK, 2 Department of Biomedical Science, The Bateson Centre, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK The gene encoding the secreted protein Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is expressed in the polarizing region (or zone of polarizing activity), a small group of mesenchyme cells at the posterior margin of the vertebrate limb bud. Detailed analyses have revealed that Shh has the properties of the long sought after polarizing region morphogen that specifies positional values across the antero-posterior axis (e.g., thumb to little finger axis) of the limb. Shh has also been shown to control the width of the limb bud by stimulating mesenchyme cell proliferation and by regulating the antero-posterior length of the apical ectodermal ridge, the signaling region required for limb bud outgrowth and the laying down of structures along the proximo-distal axis (e.g., shoulder to digits axis) of the limb. It has been shown that Shh signaling can specify antero-posterior positional values in Edited by: limb buds in both a concentration- (paracrine) and time-dependent (autocrine) fashion. Andrea Erika Münsterberg, University of East Anglia, UK Currently there are several models for how Shh specifies positional values over time in the Reviewed by: limb buds of chick and mouse embryos and how this is integrated with growth. Extensive Megan Davey, work has elucidated downstream transcriptional targets of Shh signaling. Nevertheless, it University of Edinburgh, UK Robert Hill, remains unclear how antero-posterior positional values are encoded and then interpreted University of Edinburgh, UK to give the particular structure appropriate to that position, for example, the type of digit.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Limb Morphogenesis in a Model System
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY 28, 113-122 (1972) Analysis of Limb Morphogenesis in a Model System ROBERT H. SINGER’. 2 Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts Accepted January 27, 1972 A method for analysis of chicken limb morphogenesis was devised. This method consisted of grafting a limb ectodermal jacket containing dissociated and pelleted mesenchymal cellular com- ponents to the host somites. Different cellular components stuffed into the ectoderm could be mixed in varied ratios. After 7 days the grafts were analyzed for outgrowth. Stage 19 mesoblast cells alone when treated as above gave limblike outgrowths with good digits, toes, and claws in all cases. However, mesoblasts from the proximal half of older limbs (stages 24, 25 and chondro- cytes) gave no outgrowths, and those from stage 23 gave outgrowths in 9% of the cases. In mixtures of 5% stage 19 cells with 95% chondrocytes, consistent morphogenesis (i.e., in 65% of grafts) oc- curred. The amount of morphogenesis (size of graft and perfection of digits) was directly propor- tional to the amount of stage 19 cells. However, these cells mixed with proximal cells of stages 23, 24, or 25 required higher proportions for equivalent morphogenesis. To obtain morphogenesis equivalent to the 5% mixture with chondrocytes, 10% stage 19 cells were needed when mixed with proximal stage 23, 25% with proximal stage 24 and 7% with proximal stage 25. Mixtures of stage 19 cells added to nonlimb (flank, stage- 19) mesoderm, formed large tumorous mounds of tissue with no limblike features. INTRODUCTION ectoderm ridge serves as a specific induc- The limb bud presents a good model of tive structure initiating and directing out- a developing system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organoid Handbook Building Better Organoids Introduction Organoid Culture
    THE ORGANOID HANDBOOK BUILDING BETTER ORGANOIDS INTRODUCTION ORGANOID CULTURE An organoid is a miniaturized version of an organ produced in vitro that shows realistic micro-anatomy, is capable of self-renewal While different methods, such as the use of low adhesion round bottom dishes and bioreactors, have been employed for organoid and self-organization, and exhibits similar functionality as the tissue of origin. Organoids are model systems that, in conjunction with generation, generally organoids are cultured in tissue culture plates while embedded in “domes” of purified extracellular matrix advances in cell reprogramming technology and gene editing methods, allow unprecedented insight into human development, hydrogels and submerged in organoid-specific culture medium. Multiple organoids are often cultured in one “dome” and, with media disease modeling, drug screening, and transplantation. changes, submerged organoids can remain in long-term culture to accommodate developmental and maturation timelines. Organoids can be classified into those that are tissue-derived and those that are pluripotent stem cell-derived. Tissue-derived Passage organoids typically originate from adult tissues while stem cell-derived organoids are established from embryonic (ESC) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Researchers have devised methods to generate physiologically relevant organoid models for many organs, including the intestines, lung, brain, liver, lung, pancreas, and heart. While methods for generating organoids are still evolving, presently
    [Show full text]
  • Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase: Enhanced Signaling Through Adapter Proteins
    Oncogene (2000) 19, 5582 ± 5589 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/onc Met receptor tyrosine kinase: enhanced signaling through adapter proteins Kyle A Furge1, Yu-Wen Zhang1 and George F Vande Woude*,1 1Van Andel Research Institute, 333 Bostwick, N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan, MI 49503, USA The Met receptor tyrosine kinase is the prototypic matrix (`invasion') (Jeers et al., 1996c; Matsumoto et member of a small subfamily of growth factor receptors al., 1994; Rong et al., 1994; Weidner et al., 1990). In that when activated induce mitogenic, motogenic, and addition, HGF/SF-Met signaling can induce several morphogenic cellular responses. The ligand for Met is dierent epithelial and mesenchymal cell types to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) and undergo an involved dierentiation program termed while normal HGF/SF-Met signaling is required for branching morphogenesis when the cells are grown in a embryonic development, abnormal Met signaling has three dimensional matrix (Brinkmann et al., 1995; been strongly implicated in tumorigenesis, particularly in Jeers et al., 1996c; Montesano et al., 1991a; Niemann the development of invasive and metastatic phenotypes. et al., 1998). During branching morphogenesis, groups Following ligand binding and autophosphorylation, Met of cells proliferate, migrate, and dierentiate to form a transmits intercellular signals using a unique multi- connected series of tubules arranged like branches from substrate docking site present within the C-terminal a tree. However, even in the absense of a three end of the receptor. The multisubstrate docking site dimensional matrix, signaling through the Met receptor mediates the binding of several adapter proteins such as can induce morphogenesis and lumen formation in Grb2, SHC, Crk/CRKL, and the large adapter protein certain cell types (Jeers et al., 1996a; Tsarfaty et al., Gab1.
    [Show full text]
  • Paracrine Wnt1 Drives Interstitial Fibrosis Without Inflammation by Tubulointerstitial Cross-Talk
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Paracrine Wnt1 Drives Interstitial Fibrosis without Inflammation by Tubulointerstitial Cross-Talk † Omar H. Maarouf,* Anusha Aravamudhan,* Deepika Rangarajan,* Tetsuro Kusaba,* ‡ Victor Zhang,* Jeremy Welborn,* Daniel Gauvin,* Xiuyun Hou,* Rafael Kramann,* and † Benjamin D. Humphreys* § *Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; †Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Division of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology and Medical Faculty, Rheinisch- Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; and §Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts ABSTRACT AKI with incomplete epithelial repair is a major contributor to CKD characterized by tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Injury–induced epithelial secretion of profibrotic factors is hypothesized to underlie this link, but the identity of these factors and whether epithelial injury is required remain undefined. We previously showed that activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in interstitial pericytes cell autonomously drives myofibroblast acti- vation in vivo. Here, we show that inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling also substantially prevented TGFb– dependent myofibroblast activation in vitro. To investigate whether Wnt ligand derived from proximal tubule is sufficient for renal fibrogenesis, we generated a novel mouse strain with inducible proximal tubule Wnt1 secretion. Adult mice were treated with vehicle or tamoxifen and euthanized at 12 or 24 weeks postinjection. Compared
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Fgfs in the Early Development of Vertebrate Limbs
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs Gail R. Martin1 Department of Anatomy and Program in Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143–0452 USA ‘‘Fibroblast growth factor’’ (FGF) was first identified 25 tion of two closely related proteins—acidic FGF and ba- years ago as a mitogenic activity in pituitary extracts sic FGF (now designated FGF1 and FGF2, respectively). (Armelin 1973; Gospodarowicz 1974). This modest ob- With the advent of gene isolation techniques it became servation subsequently led to the identification of a large apparent that the Fgf1 and Fgf2 genes are members of a family of proteins that affect cell proliferation, differen- large family, now known to be comprised of at least 17 tiation, survival, and motility (for review, see Basilico genes, Fgf1–Fgf17, in mammals (see Coulier et al. 1997; and Moscatelli 1992; Baird 1994). Recently, evidence has McWhirter et al. 1997; Hoshikawa et al. 1998; Miyake been accumulating that specific members of the FGF 1998). At least five of these genes are expressed in the family function as key intercellular signaling molecules developing limb (see Table 1). The proteins encoded by in embryogenesis (for review, see Goldfarb 1996). Indeed, the 17 different FGF genes range from 155 to 268 amino it may be no exaggeration to say that, in conjunction acid residues in length, and each contains a conserved with the members of a small number of other signaling ‘‘core’’ sequence of ∼120 amino acids that confers a com- molecule families [including WNT (Parr and McMahon mon tertiary structure and the ability to bind heparin or 1994), Hedgehog (HH) (Hammerschmidt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Genes D11–D13 and A13 Control Mouse Autopod Cortical
    Research article Homeobox genes d11–d13 and a13 control mouse autopod cortical bone and joint formation Pablo Villavicencio-Lorini,1,2 Pia Kuss,1,2 Julia Friedrich,1,2 Julia Haupt,1,2 Muhammed Farooq,3 Seval Türkmen,2 Denis Duboule,4 Jochen Hecht,1,5 and Stefan Mundlos1,2,5 1Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany. 2Institute for Medical Genetics, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3Human Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute for Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan. 4National Research Centre Frontiers in Genetics, Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 5Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. The molecular mechanisms that govern bone and joint formation are complex, involving an integrated network of signaling pathways and gene regulators. We investigated the role of Hox genes, which are known to specify individual segments of the skeleton, in the formation of autopod limb bones (i.e., the hands and feet) using the mouse mutant synpolydactyly homolog (spdh), which encodes a polyalanine expansion in Hoxd13. We found that no cortical bone was formed in the autopod in spdh/spdh mice; instead, these bones underwent trabecular ossification after birth. Spdh/spdh metacarpals acquired an ovoid shape and developed ectopic joints, indicating a loss of long bone characteristics and thus a transformation of metacarpals into carpal bones. The perichon- drium of spdh/spdh mice showed abnormal morphology and decreased expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), which was identified as a direct Hoxd13 transcriptional target. Hoxd11–/–Hoxd12–/–Hoxd13–/– tri- ple-knockout mice and Hoxd13–/–Hoxa13+/– mice exhibited similar but less severe defects, suggesting that these Hox genes have similar and complementary functions and that the spdh allele acts as a dominant negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterning Mechanisms Controlling Vertebrate Limb Development
    8 Sep 2001 13:46 AR AR139-4.tex AR139-4.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001. 17:87–132 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved PATTERNING MECHANISMS CONTROLLING VERTEBRATE LIMB DEVELOPMENT Javier Capdevila and Juan Carlos Izpisua´ Belmonte The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Gene Expression Laboratory, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Key Words AER, BMP, FGF, Hedgehog, limb, morphogen, pattern formation, regeneration, secreted factors, vertebrate development, WNT, ZPA ■ Abstract Vertebrate limb buds are embryonic structures for which much molecu- lar and cellular data are known regarding the mechanisms that control pattern formation during development. Specialized regions of the developing limb bud, such as the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA), the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), and the non-ridge ectoderm, direct and coordinate the development of the limb bud along the anterior- posterior (AP), dorsal-ventral (DV), and proximal-distal (PD) axes, giving rise to a stereotyped pattern of elements well conserved among tetrapods. In recent years, spe- cific gene functions have been shown to mediate the organizing and patterning activities of the ZPA, the AER, and the non-ridge ectoderm. The analysis of these gene functions has revealed the existence of complex interactions between signaling pathways oper- ated by secreted factors of the HH, TGF-/BMP, WNT, and FGF superfamilies, which interact with many other genetic networks to control limb positioning, outgrowth, and patterning. The study of limb development has helped to establish paradigms for the analysis of pattern formation in many other embryonic structures and organs.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Organoid
    Agboola et al. Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021) 12:430 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02369-8 REVIEW Open Access Brain organoid: a 3D technology for investigating cellular composition and interactions in human neurological development and disease models in vitro Oluwafemi Solomon Agboola1, Xinglin Hu1, Zhiyan Shan1, Yanshuang Wu1* and Lei Lei1,2* Abstract The study of human brain physiology, including cellular interactions in normal and disease conditions, has been a challenge due to its complexity and unavailability. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) study is indispensable in the study of the pathophysiology of neurological disorders. Nevertheless, monolayer systems lack the cytoarchitecture necessary for cellular interactions and neurological disease modeling. Brain organoids generated from human pluripotent stem cells supply an ideal environment to model both cellular interactions and pathophysiology of the human brain. This review article discusses the composition and interactions among neural lineage and non-central nervous system cell types in brain organoids, current studies, and future perspectives in brain organoid research. Ultimately, the promise of brain organoids is to unveil previously inaccessible features of neurobiology that emerge from complex cellular interactions and to improve our mechanistic understanding of neural development and diseases. Keywords: Brain organoid, Disease model, Cellular composition, Cellular interactions, Neurological development Introduction specific region [2, 3]. The further development of our Organoids are in vitro-derived structures that undergo understanding of the development of the human nervous some level of self-organization and resemble, at least in system and elucidation of the mechanisms that lead to part, in vivo organs [1]. Organoid generation depends on brain disorders represent some of the most challenging the outstanding ability of stem cells to self-organize to ongoing endeavors in neurobiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Paracrine Signaling Mediated at Cellcell Contacts
    Insights & Perspectives Think again Paracrine signaling mediated at cellÀcell contacts Sougata Roy*,† and Thomas B. Kornberg Recent findings in several organ systems show that cytoneme-mediated systems. However, recent work that we signaling transports signaling proteins along cellular extensions and targets discuss here describes paracrine signal- cell-to-cell exchanges to synaptic contacts. This mechanism of paracrine ing that is instead contact-mediated and signaling may be a general one that is used by many (or all) cell types in many (or dependent on transient synapses that all) organs. We briefly review these findings in this perspective. We also non-neuronal cells make. These synap- describe the properties of several signaling systems that have previously been ses form at sites where specialized signaling filopodia called cytonemes interpreted to support a passive diffusion mechanism of signaling protein extend to contact target cells. dispersion, but can now be understood in the context of the cytoneme mechanism. Keywords: The classical model of .cytonemes; filopodia; morphogen; paracrine signaling; synapse; TGF-b paracrine signaling assumes that signals disperse by passive Introduction so that signals are within only 15À20 nm diffusion of their target receptors when they are Animal cells communicate over long released. Paracrine signaling, the third There are many paracrine signaling distances in various ways. Endocrine general mechanism, may be considered proteins that have been characterized. cells signal systemically by releasing to be a variant of endocrine signaling, They include the Fibroblast Growth hormones that disseminate in the vas- functioning at relatively short range Factors (FGFs) and other proteins that culature. Neurons also release signals, when secreted signals move limited activate Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, but they exchange information at syn- distances by passive diffusion in extra- TGF-b family members, Wnt proteins, apses that form where their axons and cellular fluid.
    [Show full text]