The Field Identification of North American Eagles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Field Identification of North American Eagles IDENTIFICATION The field identification of North American eagles A detailed, simplifiedguide takesthe puzzlesout of positive identificationof our two widespreadeagles William S. Clark Illustrations by Brian Wheeler INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION have found this unreliable.Many sight- ings plus a few photographsof both woSPECtES OFeagles, the Bald Eagle AGLESARE DISTINGUISHED fromother flying togetherhave shown them with the (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)and the North American raptors by their samewing attitude. Both specieshave GoldenEagle (Aquila chrysaetos),occur greatersize, relativelylonger wings and beenseen soaring and gliding both on flat over most of North America north of overall dark coloration (Amadon 1975, and slightly raised wings. While this Mexico.The formeroccurs only in North Peterson1980), and, like mostraptors, character has been recommended for America while the latter has an extensive are generallyshy and mainly cannotbe field identification in certain locations, rangein the Nearctic,Palearctic as well closelyapproached by humanbeings. As suchas alongthe mountainridges in the as North America (A.O.U. Check-List a result,they are mostoften seeneither easternUnited States(Brett 1973, He•nt- perchedat greatdistances, or flying high 1957). Althoughthey are not closelyre- zelman 1976), its universal value is lated, their identification in the field is overhead hence the need for definitive doubtful.When gliding, the Bald Eagle notalways simple because of thesimilar- field marks. usually closesthe primariesmore and lty in shape,size and some plumages. Bald and Goldeneagles are compara- cocks the wrist farther forward than does (Two otherspecies, the White-tailedEa- ble in size; females and more northern theGolden Eagle (Fig. 3b, upperview) gle (Haliaeetus albicilla) and the individualsof both speciesare larger. Steller'sSea Eagle (H. pelagicus)have The Bald Eaglehas a largerhead and bill BALD EAGLE beenreported in North America,the for- and longer neck than does the Golden. mer in Massachusetts and Alaska and the The Bald Eagle's wingsappear slimmer HEFOLLOWING PLUMAGE descriptions latter in parts of Alaska.) in flight with the trailingedge more near- are based on my observationsof This paperdetails field marksthat will ly parallelto the leadingedge than the known-ageBald Eagles, both in the field allowpositive identification if an eagleis Golden Eagle's. Immaturesof both in and from photographs. seen well, and discussesdifferences be- their first plumagehave wings slightly tween thesetwo speciesin their various widerand tails longer than birds in subse- Dark Immature. This is the first plum- plumages.Many of these field marks quentplumages. The Bald Eagle'slegs age, acquiredin the nest. The bill and havenot beenpreviously published and are unfeathered for 3 to 4 inches above cereare black, eye color dark brown. The wereidentified as a resultof the develop- the toes, whereasthe GoldenEagle's are overallplumage is mostoften uniformly ment of raptor identificationworkshops feathered to the toes, most often with darkto mediumbrown. The mostimpor- for the RaptorInformation Center. These buffy feathers.Comparing adults, the tantplumage field marksin flight are the workshopshave been presentedin many GoldenEagle has the longertail, but the whitediagonal line andwhite spoton the statesand provincesand have provided tail of the Bald in first plumageis aslong underwing.Field guideshave depicted opportunitiesfor feedbackand confirma- or longerthan the Golden's. light covertareas in the immatureplum- tion of field marks, both from the stu- Wing attitude, i.e., flat vs dihedral age, but have not fully shown these dents' and author'sexperience. (angleof thesoaring wings from the hori- marks. Table 1 briefly summarizesthe impor- zontal), has been usedas an aid in sepa- Some of the nape feathersmay have tant field marks. It refers to Figure 3 rating the two species.However, after tawnytips, but these are much less exten- which illustratesflying eagles as seen extensivefield experiencewith bothspe- siveand noticeablethan the goldennape from above and below. cies in many areasof North America, I of the Golden Eagle. The primary and 822 AmericanBirds, September-October1983 Table 1. Eagle Identification Summary Bald Eagle Golden Eagle All plumages All plumages Headprojects forward of wingsmore than half the extentof the tail Head extendsforward less than half the extent of the tail. Bill and cere are unicolored. Top of headand nape "golden." Legsnotfeathered down to toes(only seen a! closerange). Bill andcere are tri-colored. Bill is darkat tip, horncolored at baseand cere is yellow. Immatureand subadult plumages Legsfeathered down to toes (with lightishcolored feathers in many Underwinghas diagonal white line on covertsand a whitespot where individuals.Only seen when close). wing meetsbody ("wingpit"). Tail is variablymottled, but if mostlywhitish, outer edge and tip are Immatureand subadultplumages dark. Whitein thewing is restrictedto thebase of thefiight feathers and does not appearon the underwingcoverts. Immaturewith lightupper wing coverts, darker flight feathersfrom above. Tail is white at base, with sharpdividing line with dark tip. Subadulthas dark cheek and light tawny stripeover the eye, also Subadulthas tawny bar on upperwing. whitishtriangle on back. Adult plumage Adult plumage Uniform dark below, but light gray barringon flight feathersand tail Unmistakablewith white head and tail. Transitionto adult produces seen at close range. unusual-lookingeagles. Tawny bar on upper wing. secondaryflight feathersare generally mostlydark, forminga bib. Somelight characterto be acquired.The whitediag- uniform dark brown, with little or no spottingappears on the back, forming an onalline under the wing disappears early, white.The upperwing coverts are a light- invertedtriangle. There is a prominent but the white spotusually remains until er brown contrastingwith the darker buffyhne abovethe eye whichextends the bird is more nearly in the first-adult flight feathers. The entire coverts are ontothe nape and highlights a darkbrown plumage. lighter, whereasin the Golden Eagle areabehind the eye. Someprimaries and adult and subadultthe light area is more secondariesexhibit white areas.The bill Adult. The first adult plumageusually restrictedand forms a bar (Fig. 3). andcere have lightened to a slatecolor shows varying amounts of black or andthe eye color has lightened to hazel, brown in the white areas of the head and WhiteBelly. The next plumage is usually althoughthis is variable. The white diag- completedby the endof the first year of onalline and white spot on the underwing age. The mostprominent feature is the arestill present and are, afterthe head- whitebelly, whichhas some dark brown tail ratio, the bestfield marksin flight. markson it. The upperbreast remains Mottled. This plumage,a continuation of the previousone intothe thirdyear, has more white and mottled areas. The eyecolor is lightened to a palewhite and thebill andcere vary from horncolor to light white-yellow.The underwing marksare still present, but on somelight individualsmay be maskedby complete- ly whiteunderwing coverts (however, this will cause no confusion with the GoldenEagle). The back of mostindivid- ualswill havethe invertedwhite triangle. Transitional. This plumage is highly variable because the subadult and adult plumagesare markedlydifferent. In gen- eral, the headbegins to lightenfirst, then the bodyand wing feathersbecome com- pletelydark. The headis usuallynot pure white, oftenwith a dark areathrough the Fig. I. ImmatureBald Eagle showingwhite eye resemblingan Osprey's eyestripe. Fig. 2. SubadultBald Eagle showingwhite belly Photo/WilliamS. Clark. The white tail is usually the last adult triangleon back. Photo/WilliamS. Clark. Vol. 37, Number5 823 Fig. 3a Eagles as seen from below. Top, Bald Eagle (I. to r. dark immature, white belly, mottled),below, Golden Eagle (I. to r. immature, sub-adult, adult). 824 AmericanBirds, September-October 1983 Fig. 3b. Eagles as seen from above. Top, Bald Eagle (I. to r. dark immature, white belly and mottled, adult), below Golden Eagle (I. to r. immature, sub-adult, adult) Vol. 37, Number 5 825 Fig.4. Immatureor subadultBald Eagle. Note white underwing and Fig. 5. Immatureor subadultGolden Eagle. Note white at baseof tail. "wingpit." Photo/Harry'N. Darrow. Photo/Harry N. Darrow. tail. In some cases, a more or less com- Sub-adult. In subsequentplumages the Wheeler and the author. I thank him for pleteterminal tail bandis present.Subse- amountof whitein the tail decreasespro- his talent, attentionto detail and pa- quentadult plumages are alike, however gressivelyuntil the 5th or 6th year when tience.Many thanksalso to the numerous even older adults can show brown and none remains. Replacementprimaries students who questioned some field black spottingin the white of the tail. and secondaries have no white. The first marks and suggestedothers. Nancy molt beginsaround one year of age, but Green made an excellent comment on Albinism. Adultshave beenreported in moltsof the flight feathersare not com- GoldenEagle bill andcere color. Appre- albinoplumage (Petit 1982, J. Hodges pleted annually (Cramp & Simmons ciationis given to JonGerrard and Peter 1979). Individuals from two to three pers. comm.).Off-white feathers replace Nye for providing photographsof the brown feathers. yearsold usuallyretain a smallamount of known-ageBald Eagles.The following white, visible from below. The upper have read drafts and providedhelpful wing coverts
Recommended publications
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of the Long-Legged Buzzard (.Buteo Rufinus) in North-Eastern Greece
    © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 39, 1998: 176-182 Reproduction and behaviour of the Long-legged Buzzard (.Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece By Haralambos Alivizatos, Vassilis Goutner and Michael G. Karandinos Abstract: Alivizatos , H., V. Goutner & M. G. Karandinos (1998): Reproduction and behaviour of the Long- legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece. Vogelwarte 39: 176-182. The breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) was studied in the Evros area, north-eastern Greece in 1989, 1990, 1992 and 1993. The mean number of young fledged per pair per year was similar between years with an overall average of 0.93 (1.58 per successful pair). Of ten home range variables examined, the num­ ber of alternative nest sites and the extent of forest free areas in home ranges were significant predictors of nest­ ling productivity. Aggressive interactions were observed with 18 bird species (of which 12 were raptors), most commonly with the Buzzard {Buteo buteo). Such interactions declined during the course of the season. Prey pro­ visioning to nestlings was greatest in the morning and late in the afternoon declining in the intermediate period. Key words: Buteo rufinus, reproduction, behaviour, Greece. Addresses: Zaliki 4, GR-115 24 Athens, Greece (H. A.); Department of Zoology, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece (V. G.); Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens 75 Iera Odos 1 1855 Athens, Greece (M. G. K.). 1. Introduction The Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) is a little known raptor of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of the Bill Apparatus in the Steller's Sea Eagle
    First Symposium on Steller’s and White-tailed Sea Eagles in East Asia pp. 1-10, 2000 UETA, M. & MCGRADY, M.J. (eds) Wild Bird Society of Japan, Tokyo Japan The morphology of the bill apparatus in the Steller’s Sea Eagle Alexander Ladyguin Moscow State University, Science Park, Educational-Research Center "Ecosoil", 119899, Moscow, Russia. e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The osteology of birds has been more thoroughly investigated than any other anatomical system in that group of animals. Being made up of many individual parts, each with numerous details, the skeleton offers more evident possibilities for study than other systems. Bones also make up most of the fossil evidence. The avian skull and mandible have featured largely in systematic accounts (e.g. Huxley 1867, Pycraft 1898, Barnikol 1952, Fisher 1944), and have attracted much attention as to function (e.g. Lakjer 1926, Hofer 1950, Bock 1970, Dzerdjinskiy 1972, 1986, Hertel 1994). Study of the avian skull rests in part on research during developmental stages, as in the adult few suture lines are retained. Some phases of development have been investigated by Parker 1890, Marinelly 1936, Jollie 1957, Sushkin 1899, 1902. Some species of Falconiformes were investigated by Parker 1873, Sushkin 1899, Fisher 1944, Jollie 1977, Hertel 1994, Ladygin 1994. No detailed investigation of the skull of sea eagles has been undertaken. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-one skulls of Steller’s Sea Eagle Haliaeetus pelagicus, 12 skulls of White-tailed Sea Eagle H. albicilla and 18 skulls of Bald Eagle H. leucocephalus were examined. Five adult, 4 subadult and 3 eaglet (4 weeks old) skulls were included in the myology study.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations Relative to Birds of Prey in Captivity in the United States of America
    ESTIMATIONS RELATIVE TO BIRDS OF PREY IN CAPTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Roger Thacker Department of Animal Laboratories The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Introduction. Counts relating to birds of prey in captivity have been accomplished in some European countries; how- ever, to the knowledge of this author no such information is available in the United States of America. The following paper consistsof data related to this subject collected during 1969-1970 from surveys carried out in many different direc- tions within this country. Methods. In an attempt to obtain as clear a picture as pos- sible, counts were divided into specific areas: Research, Zoo- logical, Falconry, and Pet Holders. It became obvious as the project advanced that in some casesthere was overlap from one area to another; an example of this being a falconer working with a bird both for falconry and research purposes. In some instances such as this, the author has used his own judgment in placing birds in specific categories; in other in- stances received information has been used for this purpose. It has also become clear during this project that a count of "pets" is very difficult to obtain. Lack of interest, non-coop- eration, or no available information from animal sales firms makes the task very difficult, as unfortunately, to obtain a clear dispersal picture it is from such sourcesthat informa- tion must be gleaned. However, data related to the importa- tion of birds' of prey as recorded by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife is included, and it is felt some observa- tions can be made from these figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying a Bird Species from the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir El-Bahari
    The secretarybird dilemma: identifying a bird species from the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari Abstract: Known from a few representations in Predynastic Egyp- tian art, the secretarybird has otherwise been elusive, in the art of Pharaonic Egypt as well as the scientific discourse on icono- graphic imagery of birds in ancient Egypt. The author’s studies of the animal decoration at the Temple for her doctoral dissertation identified three images of birds belonging most likely to the same species, depicted in the context of the expedition of Hatshepsut shown in the Portico of Punt. The zoological identification of the species as the secretarybird (another possibility is the African harrier-hawk) derives from an in-depth analysis of the bird’s sys- tematics, appearance, distribution and habitat, as well as behavior, which are essential for proper species recognition and instrumen- tal for understanding the rationale behind bringing this particular bird from the “God’s Land”. Iconographic features contesting this identification and suggesting a different species, that is, the African harrier-hawk, are discussed based on a combination of theoretical background, material analysis, on-site interviews with experts and the author’s personal experience with the species. Keywords: African animals, birds in Ancient Egypt, secretarybird, African harrier-hawk, temple of Hatshepsut, Deir el-Bahari, Hat- shepsut Punt expedition, temple decoration A bird depicted in possibly three separate scenes from the Southern Middle Portico of the Temple of Hat- shepsut in Deir el-Bahari, documented in 2012 by the author as part of her extended study of animals in the decoration of this Eighteenth Dynasty sanctuary [Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Wwtworldwide
    In each list below, only one bird has talons to catch its prey. Amazing Adaptations - Answers CIRCLE the bird with talons. Quiz for children aged 5-7 years 9 MALLARD DUCK MUTE SWAN OSPREY 10 MARSH HARRIER REED WARBLER CANADA GOOSE Round 1: Picture round The following birds were all featured in this week’s Amazing Adaptation Cards. Q Can you name them? Round 3: Which is the longest? In this week’s session you looked at birds that have long legs to keep their body above the water. In each list below, CIRCLE the bird that has the longest legs. If you get stuck, use your Amazing Adaptations Cards to help you. 11 REED WARBLER GREY HERON KINGFISHER © Tony Sutton© Tony @ flickr 12 LITTLE EGRET DIPPER MALLARD DUCK 1 (Mute) swan 2 (Grey) heron 3 Avocet 13 DIPPER AVOCET REED WARBLER In this week’s session you looked at birds that had long necks to reach food below the water. In each list below, CIRCLE the bird that has the longest neck. 14 MUTE SWAN OSPREY MALLARD DUCK © ianpreston @ flickr 4 (Mallard) duck 5 Dipper 15 MARSH HARRIER GREY HERON KINGFISHER Round 2: Odd one out round In this week’s session you looked at different types of feet suited to wetlands. In each list below, only one bird has webbed feet. Circle the bird with webbed feet. If you get stuck, use your Amazing Adaptations Cards to help you. Q Can you CIRCLE the odd one out in each list below? 6 REED WARBLER MUTE SWAN OSPREY The otter is a mammal and the other two are amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklists of the World Country Or Region: Myanmar
    Avibase Page 1of 30 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Myanmar 2 Number of species: 1088 3 Number of endemics: 5 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of introduced species: 1 6 7 8 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Myanmar. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=mm [23/09/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptosomiformes ~ Trogoniformes ~ Bucerotiformes ~ Piciformes
    Birds of the World part 6 Afroaves The core landbirds originating in Africa TELLURAVES: AFROAVES – core landbirds originating in Africa (8 orders) • ORDER ACCIPITRIFORMES – hawks and allies (4 families, 265 species) – Family Cathartidae – New World vultures (7 species) – Family Sagittariidae – secretarybird (1 species) – Family Pandionidae – ospreys (2 species) – Family Accipitridae – kites, hawks, and eagles (255 species) • ORDER STRIGIFORMES – owls (2 families, 241 species) – Family Tytonidae – barn owls (19 species) – Family Strigidae – owls (222 species) • ORDER COLIIFORMES (1 family, 6 species) – Family Coliidae – mousebirds (6 species) • ORDER LEPTOSOMIFORMES (1 family, 1 species) – Family Leptosomidae – cuckoo-roller (1 species) • ORDER TROGONIFORMES (1 family, 43 species) – Family Trogonidae – trogons (43 species) • ORDER BUCEROTIFORMES – hornbills and hoopoes (4 families, 74 species) – Family Upupidae – hoopoes (4 species) – Family Phoeniculidae – wood hoopoes (9 species) – Family Bucorvidae – ground hornbills (2 species) – Family Bucerotidae – hornbills (59 species) • ORDER PICIFORMES – woodpeckers and allies (9 families, 443 species) – Family Galbulidae – jacamars (18 species) – Family Bucconidae – puffbirds (37 species) – Family Capitonidae – New World barbets (15 species) – Family Semnornithidae – toucan barbets (2 species) – Family Ramphastidae – toucans (46 species) – Family Megalaimidae – Asian barbets (32 species) – Family Lybiidae – African barbets (42 species) – Family Indicatoridae – honeyguides (17 species) – Family
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Lake Park Brochure
    A=Abundant (easily seen), C=Common (likely seen), BIRD SP SU F W U=Uncommon (present but not easily seen), R=Rare Grasshopper Sparrow R (rarely seen), X=Accidental (may be seen but not Le Conte’s Sparrow R R R every year) Fox Sparrow U C C *** Song Sparrow U U U SP=Spring, SU=Summer, F=Fall, W=Winter Lincoln’s Sparrow U U U BIRD SP SU F W Swamp Sparrow U U C ConventionFounded: & Visitors 1844 Bureau DUCKS, GEESE & SWANs White-throated Sparrow C C C Black-bellied Whistling Duck X Harris’s Sparrow U U C The Birds Greater White-fronted Goose R U R White-crowned Sparrow U U A Incorporated: 1925 Snow Goose R R R Dark-eyed Junco C C C Canada Goose R U U Lapland Longspur R R R Tundra Swan X Smith’s Longspur R Wood Duck U U U U Chestnut-collared Longspur R R R 2008 Population: 97,550 of Lake Park Gadwall U C C Snow Bunting X American Wigeon U C C Land Area: 43 sq. miles Mallard A A A A CARDINals & ALLIES Mottled Duck X Northern Cardinal A A A A Blue-winged Teal U U R Blue Grosbeak R R R Cinnamon Teal R Lazuli Bunting X X Located in the heart of the D/FW Northern Shoveler C C C Indigo Bunting U U U Metroplex along the vital Interstate Northern Pintail U U U Painted Bunting U U U Green-winged Teal U C C Dickcissel U U U 35E and Texas 121 corridors, just a Canvasback R U R Redhead R U R BlacKBIRDS short drive from DFW Airport and Ring-necked Duck U U U Greater Scaup R Red-winged Blackbird A A A A Lesser Scaup U U C Eastern Meadowlark C U C C downtown Dallas, and readily Common Goldeneye R Western Meadowlark C C C accessible to major shopping, tourism White-winged Scoter X Yellow-headed Blackbird U U Long-tailed Duck X Brewer’s Blackbird R R and employment destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tailed Eagle Threaten to Exclude Other Avian Predators?
    Coexistence of protected avian predators: does a recovering population of White- tailed Eagle threaten to exclude other avian predators? Rimgaudas Treinys, Deivis Dementavičius, Gintautas Mozgeris, Saulis Skuja, Saulius Rumbutis & Darius Stončius European Journal of Wildlife Research ISSN 1612-4642 Volume 57 Number 6 Eur J Wildl Res (2011) 57:1165-1174 DOI 10.1007/s10344-011-0529-7 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Eur J Wildl Res (2011) 57:1165–1174 DOI 10.1007/s10344-011-0529-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Coexistence of protected avian predators: does a recovering population of White-tailed Eagle threaten to exclude other avian predators? Rimgaudas Treinys & Deivis Dementavičius & Gintautas Mozgeris & Saulis Skuja & Saulius Rumbutis & Darius Stončius Received: 17 December 2009 /Revised: 11 March 2011 /Accepted: 14 March 2011 /Published online: 7 April 2011 # Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract The processes of competition and predation high. In this study, we investigated nesting habitat overlap determine the degree to which species can coexist; the between internationally protected diurnal tree-nesting avian importance of competition in particular has been empha- predators of central Europe, namely, White-tailed Eagle sized at high trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of the Potential of Environmental DNA As A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Demonstration of the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for the detection of avian species Received: 16 October 2017 Masayuki Ushio 1,2, Koichi Murata3,4, Tetsuya Sado5, Isao Nishiumi6, Masamichi Takeshita7, Accepted: 1 March 2018 Wataru Iwasaki 7 & Masaki Miya 5 Published: xx xx xxxx Birds play unique functional roles in the maintenance of ecosystems, such as pollination and seed dispersal, and thus monitoring bird species diversity is a frst step towards avoiding undesirable consequences of anthropogenic impacts on bird communities. In the present study, we hypothesized that birds, regardless of their main habitats, must have frequent contact with water and that tissues that contain their DNA that persists in the environment (environmental DNA; eDNA) could be used to detect the presence of avian species. To this end, we applied a set of universal PCR primers (MiBird, a modifed version of fsh/mammal universal primers) for metabarcoding avian eDNA. We confrmed the versatility of MiBird primers by performing in silico analyses and by amplifying DNAs extracted from bird tissues. Analyses of water samples from zoo cages of birds with known species composition suggested that the use of MiBird primers combined with Illumina MiSeq could successfully detect avian species from water samples. Additionally, analysis of water samples collected from a natural pond detected fve avian species common to the sampling areas. The present fndings suggest that avian eDNA metabarcoding would be a complementary detection/identifcation tool in cases where visual census of bird species is difcult. Environmental DNA (eDNA) is genetic material that persists in an environment and is derived from organ- isms living there, and researchers have recently been using eDNA to detect the presence of macro-organisms, particularly those living in aquatic/semiaquatic ecosystems1–5.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Eagle & Osprey Recovery in Wisconsin
    Bald Eagle & Osprey Recovery in Wisconsin Bald Eagles Osprey Wing Span Wing Span Females 79-90” • 60-72” Males 72-82” Weight Weight • 2.5–4.5 lbs • 10-14 lbs Length Length • 23” • 31” Haliaeetus leucocephalus - Bald Eagle Pandion haliaetus -Osprey Bald Eagle Range Number of nesting Bald Eagle pairs by state - 2007 Osprey Range A Little History… . In 1782 when the U.S. adopted the bald eagle as our national bird, an estimated 100,000 nests were found in the lower 48 . By 1963 only 418 nesting pairs were found in the lower 48 . When they were delisted in 2007, we had almost 10,000 nesting pairs – 2014 ~ 14,000 . In 2017 Wisconsin had >1,590 nesting pairs Status Bald Eagles . Down-listed to threatened in 1995. Completely de-listed in 2007 . Still Protected by Bald & Golden Eagle Protection Act. The Lacy Act, & The Migratory bird Act. Osprey . Down-listed to threatened in 1989. Completely delisted in 2009. Still protected by Migratory Bird Act. WI DNR still manages both species in 2018. Species Monitoring & Management Species Monitoring - eagles Species Monitoring - eagles Statewide Eagle Survey (2017) -1,590 Occupied territories -69 of 72 Counties Species Monitoring – eagles Mid‐Winter Eagle Survey Numbers by Year 1390 1317 753 Number of Eagles 674 678 636 619 522 464 437 437 441 275 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Species Monitoring - ospreys Species Monitoring - ospreys Statewide Osprey Survey (2016) -535 Occupied territories -57 of 72 Counties What did we do bring Eagles & Ospreys back? • We banned
    [Show full text]
  • Osprey Nest Guidance
    Living with Ospreys in New Jersey: A guide for the removal, relocation, and placement of osprey nests :ĂŶƵĂƌLJϮϬϮϬ Photo by Howie Williams In New Jersey, the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, Endangered and Nongame Species Program (ENSP) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) are responsible for the management and conservation of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus). In addition, the Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey is a partnering non-profit organization that assists with osprey management and conservation. This document was produced to describe the laws that pertain to the protection of ospreys and their nests and to inform landowners and managers of these regulations to protect the birds, property, and people. We specifically address problematic nests with emphasis on nest removal, relocation and placement of alternative nest sites. These guidelines may be modified to address individual circumstances when in direct consultation with ENSP, USFWS, and USDA–Wildlife Services. Historically, before the effects of DDT caused the state's osprey population to decline, over 500 osprey nests could be found along New Jersey's coastline. Most nests were found on snags (dead trees), trees with broken tops, or on the ground. By 1974 only 50 nests remained (Clark 2004). The effects of DDT in the food chain caused reproduction to fail, and habitat was lost with a rapidly increasing shore population that eliminated many trees and increased ground predator populations. In New Jersey the osprey was listed as state endangered in 1974. Recovery began when DDT use was banned in 1968 in New Jersey and 1972 in the U.S.
    [Show full text]