Bhinneka Tunggal Ika As a National Consensus and a Universal Tool of the Indonesian Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bhinneka Tunggal Ika As a National Consensus and a Universal Tool of the Indonesian Nation ISSN p-2540-8763 / e-2615-4374 Vol. 6 Number 2, June 2021 Bhinneka Tunggal Ika As A National Consensus And A Universal Tool Of The Indonesian Nation Nurhayati 1), Rini Setiyowati 2), Yunisca Nurmalisa 3) Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Lampung University, Indonesia 1, 3) Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Sriwijaya University, Indonesia 2) [email protected] 1), [email protected] 2), [email protected] 3) Abstract. This article ims to reveal a meaning contained in Bhinneka Tunggal Ika which is used as a tool to unite the nation. In living together with diversity can be a blessing or a source of disaster depending on how we view and manage it. The existence of diversity grows and develops over time. It cannot be denied thet we live among many differences, therefore the Indonesian nation makes unity in diversity a motto that is upheld as a tool that uites all differences that exist within the nation, namely race, ethnicity, religion, and so on. Keywords: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika; National Consensus; United Nations Abstrak. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap sebuah makna yang terkandung dalam Bhinneka Tunggal Ika sebagai alat pemersatu bangsa. Dalam kehidupan bersama kebhinekaan bisa menjadi berkah atau sebaliknya sumber bencana tergantung cara kita memandang dan mengelolanya. Eksistensi kebhinnekaan tumbuh dan berkembang seiring berjalan nya waktu. Tidak bisa disangkal bahwa kita hidup diantara banyaknya perbedaan oleh karena itu bangsa Indonesia menjadikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika menjadi suatu semboyan yang dijunjung sebagai alat yang menyatukan segala perbedaan yang ada dalam diri bangsa yaitu ras, suku, agama, dan lain sebagainya. Kata Kunci: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, Konsensus Nasional, Pemersatu Bangsa 254 ISSN p-2540-8763 / e-2615-4374 Vol. 6 Number 2, June 2021 INTRODUCTION is different from another, for example that the Communities that each have a bond of culture of the Javanese will certainly be dependence is only possible if among them different from the culture of the people of there is a consensus (consensus and on the Kalimantan, Sumatra or Papua though. This basis of the consensus will facilitate the alone can be an example that the mindset of community to do a cooperation to achieve people must be different which shows the common goals. Society has a perspective will be different too. So without tendency towards consensus, namely "to have the will to accept and respect diversity, it is certain basic values that nearly everyone in the difficult to realize national unity and integrity society agrees upon" (Abdulkarim, A., (Abdulkarim, A., Ratmaningsih, N., Komalasari, K., Saripudi. D., Rtmaningsih, N., 2018). What the founders of this nation did in 2020). For example, a society that upholds the building awareness of nationalism or freedom of every individual in a society or nationalism is an effort to maintain loyalty and democracy. Such communities will tend to devotion to the nation. consensus on the rules to reach mutual There are many differences around the agreement. The form and content of these rules Indonesian people, not a few that make a and other social rules reflect the demands or trigger for problems that have occurred, ideals of community life in a country. including an inter-ethnic case in South In the context of understanding a Lampung involving 2 parties, namely the pluralistic society, in addition to the culture of Lampung ethnic group and the Balinese ethnic ethnic groups, Indonesian society also consists group. However, this did not make these two of various regional cultures which are a camps soluble in prolonged emotions and meeting of various cultures of ethnic groups in problems, they ended peacefully in the name the area. Meetings with foreign cultures also of brotherhood of the country. Living in affect the process of cultural mixing in harmony has been seen again until now and Indonesia. Indonesian society, which is a there is no longer a circle of enmity. pluralistic society, has unique characteristics History proves that culture in Indonesia that we can know from the culture of gotong is able to survive side by side, complement royong, tepaselira, the culture of respect for each other, and run in parallel. Relationships elders such as kissing hands, and making between cultures that are closely intertwined friends with people of different faiths. are framed in a Bhinneka Tunggal Ika which is Indonesia's diversity is not just a myth, not only used as a slogan in pronunciation or but a reality that lies before our eyes. We must even we only see in the context of the meaning realize that the mindset and culture of one tribe of ethnic diversity alone, but all things that 255 ISSN p-2540-8763 / e-2615-4374 Vol. 6 Number 2, June 2021 make differences in society can be realized and influence under Prime Minister Gajah Mada. accommodated in Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Ika The formulation of Bhinneka Tungga Ika by (Aghabian, 2015). Mpu Tantular began with an effort to overcome differences in religion and belief at RESEARCH METHODS the beginning of the establishment of The method used literature review, the Majapahit Kingdom with full tolerance where researchers collect data from relevant (Kurniawan, J. A., dan Candidate, 2018). The sources; journals and books. This technique unity and balance of the two religions at that aims at revealing various theories that are time was a concept that touched the relevant to the problems being importance of harmony and the relationship faced/researched as reference materials in the between the two religions. discussion of research results. At the beginning of this third millennium heard the phrase Unity as pu i si DISCUSSION sung expression of religiosity and The History and Meaning of Bhinneka philosophical insights that deliver time Tunggal Ika honored ethos of intercultural and inter- The term Bhinneka Tunggal Ika was religious. However, it is different from first known in the Majapahit era, the leadership unversilism and pluralism. Bhinneka Tunggal of Wisnuwardhana was written by Mpu Ika reflects both and a worldview Tantular in the book Sutasoma in the XIV where dharma (truth) is one aspect multiplied (fourteen) century in the Majapahit (Butler, 2016). Then it teaches religious Kingdom. In the book MPU Tantular tolerance which puts Hinduism and A gamma write "Rwaneka dhatu winuwus Buddhist B Udha live peacefully in accordance Wiswa, Bhinekha rakwa ring apan hit formulated by the MPU Tantular. parwanosen, Mangka ng Jinatwa among In connection with this, the founders of Siwatatwa single, Bhinneka Tunggal Ika tan the Indonesian nation were inspired to make hanaharmamangrwa" (that A gamma Buddha the motto of the Indonesian nation. The and Shiva (Hindu) are different substances, stipulation of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika as the but the true values of Buddha and Siwa is motto of the Republic of Indonesia through a singular. Torn apart, but one nevertheless, that long process to be chosen. The motto is not dharma ambiguous. the spirit of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika began to become a tolerance be r religion in those days was very limited discussion at BPUPKI sessions important as an element or foundation and between Muh. Yamin, Ir. Soekarno, I Gusti security features to create Majapahit, Bagus Sugriwa about two and a half months especially when it reaches a height power and 256 ISSN p-2540-8763 / e-2615-4374 Vol. 6 Number 2, June 2021 before the proclamation. Then the motto bond that embraces diversity in a nation is an Bhinneka Tunggal Ika was proposed independent and sovereign country, by Muhammad Yamin to Ir. Soekarno to be Indonesia (Secretariat General of MPR RI, used as the motto of the state. The motto is 2012:176). It is based on the basic framework depicted under the coat of arms of the of Indonesian life that is based on the Indonesian state known as Garuda ideologue i Pancasila (five principles) states Pancasila. The coat of arms of Indonesia that the ethnic diversity of religion, race is an complete with the motto "Bhinneka Tunggal asset or wealth of the nation. Through the Ika" has been stipulated in Government concept of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika, the concept Regulation no. 66 T ear 1951 about Emblem of togetherness and ethnic unity will restore State an official motto of the Republic of the spirit of the Indonesian nation to uphold Indonesia. Then in 2012, the People's unity in diversity. Consultative Assembly (MPR) stated clearly According to Lalonde (Hardono, 1994) that Bhinneka Tunggal Ika was one of the four Bhinneka Tunggal Ika is a concept that is more National Pillars (National Pillars). than tolerance of religious differences but also The term "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika" extends to tolerance of physical, cultural, which originally indicated the spirit of linguistic, socio-political, ideological and religious tolerance, was later adopted as the psychological differences. That is, it motto of the Indonesian nation. As the nation's represents a movement towards more complex motto, the context of the problem is not only unity, based on understanding that differences about religious tolerance but is much broader enrich human interactions. (Baihaki, as is commonly referred to as ethnicity, 2017) , Bhinneka Tunggal Ika as the motto of religion, race, and inter-group the Indonesian state is intended to unite all the (SARA). Bhinneka Tunggal Ika as a symbol of differences that exist in society, such as uniting the state is an effort to unite a pluralistic the vision and mission of becoming a family society with diverse cultural that protects, nurtures, respects, respects one backgrounds. Diversity and uniqueness as a another. Because basically all people in reality of society and the environment as well Indonesia have the same goal. as aspirations to build the nation are (Kurniawan, J.
Recommended publications
  • Diversity for Peace: India's Cultural Spirituality
    Cultural and Religious Studies, January 2017, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1-16 doi: 10.17265/2328-2177/2017.01.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Diversity for Peace: India’s Cultural Spirituality Indira Y. Junghare University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA In this age, the challenges of urbanization, industrialization, globalization, and mechanization have been eroding the stability of communities. Additionally, every existence, including humans, suffers from nature’s calamities and innate evolutionary changes—physically, mentally, and spiritually. India’s cultural tradition, being one of the oldest, has provided diverse worldviews, philosophies, and practices for peaceful-coexistence. Quite often, the multi-faceted tradition has used different methods of syncretism relevant to the socio-cultural conditions of the time. Ideologically correct, “perfect” peace is unattainable. However, it seems necessary to examine the core philosophical principles and practices India used to create unity in diversity, between people of diverse races, genders, and ethnicities. The paper briefly examines the nature of India’s cultural tradition in terms of its spirituality or philosophy of religion and its application to social constructs. Secondarily, the paper suggests consideration of the use of India’s spirituality based on ethics for peaceful living in the context of diversity of life. Keywords: diversity, ethnicity, ethics, peace, connectivity, interdependence, spiritual Introduction The world faces conflicts, violence, and wars in today’s world of globalization and due to diversity of peoples, regarding race, gender, age, class, birth-place, ethnicity, religion, and worldviews. In addition to suffering resulting from conflicts and violence arising from the issues of dominance and subservience, we have to deal with evolutionary changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and Dignity: More Than the Absence of Humiliation – What We Can Learn from the Asia-Pacific Region
    Peace and Dignity: More than the Absence of Humiliation – What We Can Learn from the Asia-Pacific Region Evelin G. Lindner, M.D., Ph.D. (Dr. med. and Dr. psychol.) Social Scientist Founding President of Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies (HumanDHS, www.humiliationstudies.org/) - affiliated with the University of Oslo, Department of Psychology, Norway (folk.uio.no/evelinl/, [email protected]) - affiliated with the Columbia University Conflict Resolution Network, New York ([email protected]) - affiliated with the Maison des Sciences de l'Homme, Paris - teaching, furthermore, in South East Asia, the Middle East, Australia, and other places globally (www.humiliationstudies.org/whoweare/evelin.php) - watch the introductory lecture "Dignity or Humiliation: The World at a Crossroad," given at the University of Oslo, Norway, on January 2009, at www.sv.uio.no/it/av/PSYC3203-14.1.09.html This paper was written for The Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies: Occasional Papers Series in 2009, however, since this series closed in December 2009, it is published on www.humiliationstudies.org/whoweare/evelin02.php. November 2009 Abstract In an interdependent world, peace is not optional, it is compulsory, if humankind is to survive. Local conflicts, particularly protracted conflicts, are inscribed into, and taken hostage by larger global pressures, and vice versa, and this diffuses insecurity. Peace is more than resolved conflict. What is needed is the pro-active creation of global social cohesion. In an interdependent world, security is no longer attainable through keeping enemies out but only through keeping a compartmentalised world together. How do we, as humankind, keep a disjointed world together in a pro-active way? And how can Asia contribute to this task? This is the topic of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Bhinneka Tunggal Ika” in Forming Harmony of Multicultural Society
    Unconsidered Ancient Treasure, Struggling the Relevance of Fundamental Indonesia Nation Philosophie “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika” in Forming Harmony of Multicultural Society Fithriyah Inda Nur Abida, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia Dewi Mayangsari, Trunojoyo University, Indonesia Syafiuddin Ridwan, Airlangga University, Indonesia The Asian Conference on Cultural Studies Official Conference Proceedings 0139 Abstract Indonesia is a multicultural country consists of hundreds of distinct native ethnic, racist, and religion. Historically, the Nation was built because of the unitary spirit of its components, which was firmly united and integrated to make up the victory of the Nation. The plurality become advantageous when it reach harmony as reflected in the National motto “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika”. However, plurality also issues social conflict easily. Ever since its independence, the scent of disintegration has already occurred. However, in the last decade, social conflicts with a variety of backgrounds are intensely happened, especially which is based on religious tensions. The conflict arises from differences in the interests of various actors both individuals and groups. It is emerged as a fractional between the groups in the society or a single group who wants to have a radically changes based on their own spiritual perspective. Pluralism is not a cause of conflict, but the orientation which is owned by each of the components that determine how they’re viewing themselves psychologically in front of others. “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika” is an Old Javanese phrase of the book “Sutasoma” written by Mpu Tantular during the reign of the Majapahit sometime in the 14th century, which literally means “Diverse, yet united” or perhaps more poetically in English: Unity in Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Unity in Diversity in Indian Society Sociology / GE / Semester-II
    Unity in Diversity in Indian Society Sociology / GE / Semester-II India is a plural society both in letter and spirit. It is rightly characterized by its unity and diversity. A grand synthesis of cultures, religions and languages of the people belonging to different castes and communities has upheld its unity and cohesiveness despite multiple foreign invasions. National unity and integrity have been maintained even through sharp economic and social inequalities have obstructed the emergence of egalitarian social relations. It is this synthesis which has made India a unique mosque of cultures. Thus, India present seemingly multicultural situation within in the framework of a single integrated cultural whole. The term ‘diversity’ emphasizes differences rather than inequalities. It means collective differences, that is, differences which mark off one group of people from another. These differences may be of any sort: biological, religious, linguistic etc. Thus, diversity means variety of races, of religions, of languages, of castes and of cultures. Unity means integration. It is a social psychological condition. It connotes a sense of one-ness, a sense of we-ness. It stands for the bonds, which hold the members of a society together. Unity in diversity essentially means “unity without uniformity” and “diversity without fragmentation”. It is based on the notion that diversity enriches human interaction. When we say that India is a nation of great cultural diversity, we mean that there are many different types of social groups and communities living here. These are communities defined by cultural markers such as language, religion, sect, race or caste. Various forms of diversity in India: Religious diversity: India is a land of multiple religions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation Building∗
    Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation Building∗ Samuel Bazziy Arya Gaduhz Alexander Rothenbergx Maisy Wong{ Boston University University of Arkansas RAND Corporation University of Pennsylvania and CEPR February 2018 Abstract Ethnic divisions complicate nation building, but little is known about how to mitigate these divisions. We use one of history’s largest resettlement programs to show how intergroup contact affects long-run integration. In the 1980s, the Indonesian government relocated two million migrants into hundreds of new communities to encourage interethnic mixing. Two decades later, more diverse communities exhibit deeper integration, as reflected in language use and intergroup marriage. Endogenous sor- ting across communities cannot explain these effects. Rather, initial conditions, including residential segregation, political and economic competition, and linguistic differences influence which diverse communities integrate. These findings contribute lessons for resettlement policy. JEL Classifications: D02, D71, J15, O15, R23 Keywords: Cultural Change, Diversity, Identity, Language, Migration, Nation Building ∗We thank Alberto Alesina, Oriana Bandiera, Toman Barsbai, Giorgio Chiovelli, Raquel Fernandez, Paola Giuliano, Dilip Mookherjee, Nathan Nunn, Daniele Paserman, Ben Olken, Imran Rasul and seminar participants at Boston University, George- town University, Harvard University, the Kiel Institute, McGill University, MIT, Notre Dame, University of Colorado Denver, University of Southern California, University
    [Show full text]
  • The IX South-East European Gathering
    The IX South-East European Gathering Budva, 25 – 27. May, 2012 Speech by Dr Zlatko Lagumdžija, Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina at the IX South-East European Gathering – „E Pluribus Unum“ and „United in Diversity“ Ladies and gentlemen, It is a great pleasure and a great honour to stand here before this respective audience and give a speech at the IX South-East European Gathering. Looking at the brochure/invitation of this distinguished program I noticed a phrase. “E PLURIBUS UNUM”! 1. “E PLURIBUS UNUM” and the United States of America This phrase, which is present on the Seal of the United States and which is de facto motto of the United States (de facto since it was never codified- official motto of the US is “In God We Trust) tells us a lot about American society. "E Pluribus Unum" was the motto proposed for the first Great Seal of the United States by John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson in 1776. A Latin phrase meaning "One from many," the phrase offered a strong statement of the American determination to form a single nation from a collection of states. Over the years, "E Pluribus Unum" has also served as a reminder of America's attempt to make one unified nation of people from many different backgrounds and beliefs. The challenge of seeking unity while respecting diversity has played a critical role in shaping US history, US literature, and US national character. Originally suggesting that out of many colonies or states emerge a single nation, in recent years it has come to suggest that out of many peoples, races, religions and ancestries has emerged a single people and nation where “all men are created equal” as it is stated in the “Declaration of Independence”.1Thus, USA have been democratically developing its “One from many” society for more than two centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge to Religious Tolerance: Fundamentalist Resistance to a Non-Muslim Leader in Indonesia
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 77 Article 8 Number 77 Fall 2017 11-8-2017 The hC allenge to Religious Tolerance: Fundamentalist Resistance to a Non-Muslim Leader in Indonesia Hisanori Kato [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Kato, Hisanori (2017) "The hC allenge to Religious Tolerance: Fundamentalist Resistance to a Non-Muslim Leader in Indonesia," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 77 : No. 77 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol77/iss77/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Kato: The Challenge to Religious Tolerance: Fundamentalist Resistance t Comparative Civilizations Review 77 The Challenge to Religious Tolerance: Fundamentalists’ Resistance to a Non-Muslim Leader in Indonesia Hisanori Kato Introduction The largest mosque in Southeast Asia, called Istiqlal, stands across the street from a Catholic cathedral in the center of the Indonesian capital, Jakarta. These two major religious buildings in Indonesia stand in a rather peaceful setting. In addition, Candi Borobudur, which is located in Central Java, is the largest and oldest single Buddhist monument in the world, with more than a 1,200-year-long history. Despite the fact that Indonesia is the most populous Muslim nation in the world,1 Indonesia has boasted of its religious tolerance for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Thailand
    INDONESIA THAILAND CAMBODIA MALAYSIA BRUNEI MALAYSIA SINGAPORE SUMATRA ALIMANTAN SULAWESI JAARTA INDONESIA : JAVA BALI BHINNEKA TUNGGAL IKA YOGYAARTA KOMODO / FLORES UNITY IN DIVERSITY LOMBO A vast archipelago stretching for over 5,000 kilometres and BALI encompassing more than 17,000 islands, Indonesia is diverse and fascinating. Its appeal includes traditional cultures, rich Bali Barat National Park volcanic beauty, tropical beaches and imaginative arts and Amlapura Negara architecture. Ubud Denpasar Seminyak Bali’s beaches, easygoing air and warm hospitality have long Denpasar International Airport Kuta Nusa Dua made it a delightful holiday destination. Its interior is lush and Uluwatu green with vast terraced rice fields. Its strong artistic heritage is evidenced by exquisite batik paintings and intricate wood Sumatra’s wild volcanic landscape offers plenty of carvings. Lombok is less well-known and unique in its Sasak options for trekking while its vast crater lake, Lake Toba, heritage and culture. provides a spectacular backdrop for a few days’ relaxing on the island of Palau Samosir. Java plays host not only to the famous Borobudur Temple, an architectural wonder and UNESCO World Heritage Site, but Kalimantan is Indonesia’s portion of the island of also highland retreats, tea plantations, volcanoes and scenic Borneo. Orangutans and proboscis monkeys may be mountain passes. viewed from traditional boats weaving through the waters of the Tanjung Puting National Park. Komodo Sulawesi’s forested heart protects the regency of Tana Toraja dragons are the stars on Komodo and Rinca, two of the where hanging graves and cliffs displaying ancestral sculptures very few islands where these massive lizards live in the are a vital element of the death-venerating culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Condition of Freedom of Religion/ Belief in Indonesia 2011
    EDITOR: Ismail Hasani The ConditionBonar Tigor Naipospos of Freedom of Religion/ Belief in Indonesia 2011 POLITIK DISKRIMINASI REZIM SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO Kondisi Kebebasan Beragama/Berkeyakinan di Indonesia 2011 Pustaka Masyarakat Setara The Condition of Freedom of Religion/ Belief in Indonesia 2011 Jakarta, January 2012 155 mm x 230 mm vi + 134 pages ISBN: 978-602-18668-0-1 Writers Agnes Dwi R (Jakarta) Akhol Firdaus (Jawa Timur) Apridon Zaini (Sulawesi Utara) Azhari Aiyub (Aceh) Dewi Nova (Banten) Indra Listiantara (Jakarta) M. Bahrun (NTB) M. Irfan (Jawa Barat) Rochmond Onasis (Kalimantan Tengah) Syarif Abadi (Lampung) Editor Ismail Hasani Bonar Tigor Naipospos Layout Titikoma-Jakarta Cover source www.matanews.com Diterbitkan oleh Pustaka Masyarakat Setara The Condition of Freedom of Religion/ Belief in Indonesia 2011 Foreword The freedom of religion / belief condition report in Indonesia in 2011 was presented to the public on December 19, 2011. However, due to various resource constraints this report has just been published in February 2012. As a monitoring report, this publication is intended in order to expand the spectrum of readers and the expansion of Setara community constituency to jointly advocate the freedom of religion / belief in Indonesia. The report titled Discrimination Politics in the Regime of Soesilo Bambang Yudhoyono, is the fifth report since 2007 SETARA Institute publishes an annual report. As written in previous reports, the events of freedom of religion / belief violations reported by using the standard method and recording. Regular modifications made​​for the current themes which becomes the tendency in the particular recent years. This time, the report contains nine kinds of topics of discrimination and violence targeting religious groups / beliefs, and spread in different areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bhineka Tunggal Ika As a Source of Politics and the Identity of Indonesian Culture in the Formation of Law
    International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 13, Issue 7, 2020 Bhineka Tunggal Ika as a Source of Politics and the Identity of Indonesian Culture in the Formation of Law Gede Marhaendra Wija Atmajaa, aFaculty of Law, Udayana University, Email: [email protected], [email protected] The purpose of this study is to analyse Bhineka Tunggal Ika as a source of politics and cultural identity in the formation of law in Indonesia. In general, no one knows or even uses Bhineka Tunggal Ika as the source of legal formation. However, often the formation of law in Indonesia refers to the philosophical meaning of Bhineka Tunggal Ika. The research problems are as follows : 1) What are the markers of Bhineka Tunggal Ika in legal formation? 2) Why is Bhineka Tunggal Ika so important? 3) Does Bhineka Tunggal Ika contribute to the formation of customary law? This research was completed using qualitative methods. All data was collected directly or indirectly. Data acquisition was optimised through a literature study. All data was analysed qualitatively. The results showed that: 1) Bhineka Tunggal Ika can be a marker of Indonesian cultural identity in legal pluralism; 2) Bhineka Tunggal Ika, in the formation of state law, is considered relevant as a political source to accommodate customary law and religious law into state law; 3) Bhineka Tunggal Ika, as it relates to the identity of Indonesian national culture, has contributed to the formation of customary law in the midst of modern times. Key words: Politics, Identity of Indonesian Culture, Law, Indonesia. Introduction Cultural identity is a reflection of social security (Pradana, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • THE RHETORIC of UNITY in a PLURALISTIC EARLY AMERICA By
    THE RHETORIC OF UNITY IN A PLURALISTIC EARLY AMERICA by Joel Wilson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts & Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida December 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the help provided by his thesis chair, Adam Bradford. Without the hours, the minutes, the seconds he devoted to this manuscript, the author would have been lost in the mire of academic writing. For his munificent help, Professor Bradford, the author is grateful. The author would also like to thank Professors John Golden and Steven Blakemore for their assistance—without them, this project would not only be incomplete but even more error-ridden. The author would like to thank Professors Lisa Swanstrom and John Leeds who, in the seminars they held, directed what came to be this thesis’s three chapters. For their early guidance and first round of editing, the author is truly grateful. Finally, the author would like to thank Professor Thomas Martin who prepared the author for the writing necessary in graduate school. For his generous devotion of time as well as his unreserved dedication to his students, please accept the author’s humble and profound thanks. Again, the author expresses his wholehearted and unconditional appreciation to these dutiful scholars and teachers. These committed scholars have, in the author’s case, proved the truth found in Seneca’s words: Diligentia maximum etiam mediocris ingeni subsidium. iii ABSTRACT Author: Joel Wilson Title: The Rhetoric of Unity in a Pluralistic Early America Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Cultural, Ethnic & Religious Diversity Challenges In
    Addressing Cultural, Ethnic & Religious Diversity Challenges in Europe A Comparative Overview of 15 European Countries Anna Triandafyllidou European University Institute 2011/02 1. Overview National Discourses Comparative Country Report Cultural Diversity in Europe: A Comparative Analysis 2 Anna Triandafyllidou EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Addressing Cultural, Ethnic and Religious Diversity Challenges in Europe A Comparative Overview of 15 European Countries ANNA TRIANDAFYLLIDOU 3 Cultural Diversity in Europe: A Comparative Analysis © 2012 ACCEPT Pluralism This report was first published in November 2011. This is a revised version, prepared in February 2012. This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the research project, the year and the publisher. Published by the European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Via dei Roccettini 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole - Italy ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project, Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe European Commission, DG Research Seventh Framework Programme Social Sciences and Humanities grant agreement no. 243837 www.accept-pluralism.eu www.eui.eu/RSCAS/ Available from the EUI institutional repository CADMUS cadmus.eui.eu P1 Overview of National Discourses on Tolerance and Cultural Diversity (Literature and Realities) D 1.2 Synthesis and Comparative Overview of the Country Reports The layout of this report has been prepared by Ms Nina Papaioannou 4 Anna Triandafyllidou The ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe In 2001, violent conflicts between native British and Asian Muslim youth took place in northern England.
    [Show full text]