Management Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biozidbelastung Stoppen Und Gewässerschutz
Biozidbelastung stoppen & Gewässerschutz stärken: Die Wakenitz-Verordnung und das Antifoulingverbot für Sportboote Flüsse und Seen bilden wichtige Biotope für den Erhalt Für einen wirksamen und nachhaltigen Gewässerschutz der Artenvielfalt, sind zugleich Lebensader und Lebens- sollte neben einer strengen Stoffgesetzgebung ein ressource. Einträge von umweltgefährlichen Chemikalien schrittweiser Ausstieg aus der Verwendung biozidhaltiger sollen vermieden werden. Dies gilt besonders für Gebiete, Antifoulings erfolgen. Als erste Maßnahme sollten die die unter besonderem Schutz stehen. Dennoch sind Kommunen und Länder regionale Verbote für besonders noch immer biozidhaltige Antifouling-Beschichtungen geschützte Gebiete festschreiben. Dass dies funktioniert, für den Bewuchsschutz von Bootsrümpfen die Regel. zeigt der Kreis Herzogtum Lauenburg mit seinen Ratze- Die Farbanstriche enthalten einen oder mehrere giftige burger Seen und dem Fluss Wakenitz. Ein Beispiel, das Wirkstoffe, sogenannte Biozide, und setzen diese konti- Schule machen sollte. nuierlich in das umgebende Wasser frei. Gesetzgeber, Fachbehörden und Experten plädieren da- Der Einsatz von Bioziden ist mit für, Vorsorgemaßnahmen und biozidfreien Alternativen Risiken verbunden stets den Vorzug vor den biozidhaltigen Anstrichen zu Der Zweck von Bioziden ist stets das Abtöten oder die geben.1 Die Realität sieht in Deutschland jedoch anders Schädigung von Lebewesen. Diese Wirkung bleibt nicht auf aus. Die meisten Bootseigner entscheiden sich für die den unerwünschten Rumpfbewuchs beschränkt. Andere toxischen Biozidanstriche, selbst in bewuchsarmen Süß- Wasserlebewesen werden geschädigt und Sedimente sowie wasserrevieren. Trinkwasserressourcen belastet. Außerdem bergen Biozide Eine gesunde Welt für alle. Mensch und Umwelt vor Pestiziden schützen. Alternativen fördern. Risiken für die menschliche Gesundheit, wenn beim Be- und Entschichten oder bei der Reinigung der Bootsrümpfe umstehende Personen über den Sprühnebel oder direkt über die Haut mit den Mitteln in Kontakt kommen. -
The Schoenberg Case: Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste
Volume 30 Issue 1 Winter 1990 Winter 1990 The Schoenberg Case: Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste Marco Nunez-Muller Recommended Citation Marco Nunez-Muller, The Schoenberg Case: Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste, 30 Nat. Resources J. 153 (1990). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol30/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. MARCO N(1fqEZ-MULLER* The Schoenberg Case: Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste Abnormally dangerous activities in frontier areas (for example, nuclear power plants of hazardous waste dumping sites at the border) have become one of the main topics in international environmental law.' The difficult legal issues of this emerging field of law get particularly complicated when they are combined with legal differences between West Germany and East Germany. The situation becomes especially complicated when individuals demanding judicial attention have insufficient international legal protection. These circumstances sometimes force an action against international pollution to appear before national courts ruling under do- mestic law. The "Schoenberg Case" exemplifies this situation. The waste dump Schoenberg is located in the district of Rostock, East Germany, about six kilometers east of the border checkpoint Luebeck- Schlutup. It is a 500 acre state-owned enterprise. Since 1981, West Ger- many and other European countries have dumped more than one million metric tons of household refuse and highly toxic, water-soluble, persistent wastes (that is, heavy metals and chloridized hydrocarbons) on an area of approximately 150 acres. -
Geological and Numerical Modeling of Geogenic Salinization in the Area of the Lübeck Basin (North Germany)
18 SWIM. Cartagena 2004, Spain. (Ed. Araguás, Custodio and Manzano). IGME GEOLOGICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELING OF GEOGENIC SALINIZATION IN THE AREA OF THE LÜBECK BASIN (NORTH GERMANY) A. GRUBE 1,* and B. LOTZ 2 1 Rogge & Co. Hydrogeologie GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Str. 2, 30827 Hannover; E-mail: [email protected] 2 GeoforschungsZentrum Potsdam, Section 5.2 Geothermics, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam; E-mail [email protected] Abstract The present work delineates a preliminary interpretation of the existing data regarding the distribution pattern and origin of salinized water (>250 mg Cl/L) in the Lübeck area (North west Germany). The results of the geological-structural interpretation, of the groundwater flow-modelling and of the hydrochemical data evaluations are discussed with regard to transport- and mixing-processes. As sources of geogenic waters in the area, subrosion waters of the neighbouring salt diapirs, ascending deeper (fossil) waters and the intrusion from the brackish Baltic Sea occur. Salinization is mainly found in the basal parts of the aquifer (Vierland, Ubks) in the Hemmelsdorf Basin. In the adjoining Oldesloe Trough saltwaters mainly occur in the Vierland, Ubks, Obks and Kaolin Sands. A salinization can be noticed in the vicinity of large river valleys (exfiltration areas). A detailed geological model has proved to be useful for the interpretation and serves as a basis for a numerical model. The groundwater-flow model shows maximum travel times of the groundwater of more than 7 000 years for the transition of the deep aquifers (max. depths >1 000 m) of the Oldesloe Trough into the Hemmelsdorf Basin. The salinization in the Vierland sediments could be a relict from Pleistocene (Weichselian) flow systems. -
Survey of River and Sea Lampreys in German Waters of the Baltic Sea – Basis of Successful Rebuilding Programmes. ICES CM 2005
Not to be cited without prior reference to the authors ICES Annual Science Conference 2005 CM 2005/W:06 Rebuilding Programmes for Threatened Fish Populations Survey of river and sea lampreys in German waters of the Baltic Sea – basis of successful rebuilding programmes R. Thiel, H. M. Winkler, P. Riel and R. Neumann ABSTRACT In order to prepeare population rebuilding programmes, the status of river lamprey and sea lamprey was investigated within the German waters of the Baltic Sea. From August 2003 until August 2005 the following sources of data were analysed: (i) research fisheries with otter and shrimp trawls, (ii) records from commercial and recreational fisheries, (iii) records from ichthyological museum collections, (iv) commercial catch statistics and relevant publications. 317 records of river lampreys with 19,977,622 individuals and 89 records of sea lampreys with 129 individuals were obtained for the period from 1649 - 2005. The number of recorded individuals of river lampreys per year was two times higher from 1649 - 1939 than in the following period 1940 - 1989. Only 1 % of the yearly records of river lampreys from this time period was estimated from 1990 - 2005. No distinct trend of the temporal population development of sea lamprey was found. From 1829 - 1989 the highest number of records of sea lamprey (70 %) was estimated for subdivisions 22 and 24. From 1990 - 2005 all records of sea lamprey in German Baltic waters were distributed within the coastal waters and estuaries. Areas with distinct higher densities of sea lamprey records were not estimated. Most of the records of river lamprey (88 %) originated from subdivisions 24 and 26 from 1649-1989. -
CAPSTONE 20-2 Europe Field Study
CAPSTONE 20-2 Europe Field Study Subject Page Turkey ........................................................................ 2 Norway .....................................................................3 3 Germany...................................................................62 1 Turkey Subject Page CIA Summary ............................................................3 Culture Gram........................................................... 25 2 Middle East :: Turkey — The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency MIDDLE EAST :: TURKEY Introduction :: TURKEY Background: Modern Turkey was founded in 1923 from the remnants of the defeated Ottoman Empire by national hero Mustafa KEMAL, who was later honored with the title Ataturk or "Father of the Turks." Under his leadership, the country adopted radical social, legal, and political reforms. After a period of one-party rule, an experiment with multi-party politics led to the 1950 election victory of the opposition Democrat Party and the peaceful transfer of power. Since then, Turkish political parties have multiplied, but democracy has been fractured by periods of instability and military coups (1960, 1971, 1980), which in each case eventually resulted in a return of formal political power to civilians. In 1997, the military again helped engineer the ouster - popularly dubbed a "post-modern coup" - of the then Islamic-oriented government. An unsuccessful coup attempt was made in July 2016 by a faction of the Turkish Armed Forces. Turkey intervened militarily on Cyprus in 1974 to prevent a Greek takeover of the island and has since acted as patron state to the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus," which only Turkey recognizes. A separatist insurgency begun in 1984 by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), a US-designated terrorist organization, has long dominated the attention of Turkish security forces and claimed more than 40,000 lives. In 2013, the Turkish Government and the PKK conducted negotiations aimed at ending the violence, however intense fighting resumed in 2015. -
B-Bericht FGE Schlei/Trave
BERNET CATCH RegionalBERNET CATCH Report: "%2.%4#!4#( Network on the implementation of EU Water Framework Directive in the Baltic Sea Catchment Schwentine River, Water Management Plan. Provisional Water Management Schwentine River, Plan Pursuant Directive Framework to the EU Water BERNET is a network co-operation between seven regions in the Baltic Sea Region. The network was formed in 1999 as a regional contribution to improve the aquatic environment of the Baltic Sea and of the regional waters in its catchment. BERNET CATCH Regional Report: Right from the start, BERNET has focused especially on Eutrophication problems. Doing this, the BERNET Partners have wished to contribute to full-fi lling the aim of the Helsinki Declaration in “assuring the ecological restoration of the Baltic Sea”. Schwentine River, The present BERNET-CATCH project that has been running for the period 2003-2006 focuses primarily on the regional implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Through their activities in BERNET CATCH, the partners Water Management Plan present and evaluate different regional (and national) solutions in order to fulfi ll the objective of achieving at least “good ecological status” of all EU waters before 2015. Provisional Management Plan Pursuant The co-operation involves the actual water managers in the regions, and takes place through face-to-face exchange of experiences and cross regional comparisons of environmental threads to the waters within the Baltic Sea catchment, including cause-effect relations. The main activities of BERNET-CATCH is the provision of Water Management Plans to the EU Water Framework Directive within regional pilot catchments in order to distribute important knowledge and experiences that may serve as good examples to Water Managers and Stakeholders involved in the implementation of the EU-Water Framework Directive. -
Supplementary Appendix
The following supplement accompanies the article Endangered anadromous lampreys in the southern Baltic Sea: spatial distribution, long-term trend, population status Ralf Thiel1,*, Helmut M. Winkler2, Philip Riel3, Renate Neumann1, Tomas Gröhsler4, Uwe Böttcher4, Siegfried Spratte5, Uwe Hartmann5 1Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Universitätsplatz 2, 18055 Rostock, Germany 3Zoological Institute and Museum, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Johann Sebastian Bach-Straße 11/12, 17487 Greifswald, Germany 4Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Alter Hafen Süd 2, 18069 Rostock, Germany 5Office for Rural Areas, Department of Fishery, Wischhofstr. 1-3, 24148 Kiel, Germany Email: [email protected] Endangered Species Research 8:233–247 (2009) Supplement. Historical records of sea lamprey Table S1. Petromyzon marinus. Historical records in territorial waters and in the EEZs of Germany, Poland, Lithuania and the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad within ICES Subdivisions 22 and 24–26 of the southern Baltic Sea in the time period 1855 to 1989. GOMS: German Oceanographic Museum, Stralsund, Germany; ZMUG: Zoological Institute and Museum of the Ernst-Moritz- Arndt-University Greifswald, Germany; NHMB: Museum of Natural History of the Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany; ZMUK: Zoological Museum of the Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Germany; ZMUH: Zoological Institute and Museum of the University of Hamburg, Germany; ZSRO: Zoological collection of the Department of Biology of the University of Rostock, Germany; NHMS: Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Germany No. Year Sub division Country Locality No.