DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Kongwa Ranch to Link Smallholder Beef Producers to Profitable Markets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Kongwa Ranch to Link Smallholder Beef Producers to Profitable Markets THE ROLE OF KONGWA RANCH TO LINK SMALLHOLDER BEEF PRODUCERS TO PROFITABLE MARKETS A research report submitted to Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Agricultural Production Chain Management specialising in Livestock Chains OMARY ATHUMAN NKULLO SEPTEMBER-2013 i Permission to use In presenting this research project in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master degree, I agree that the library of this university may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this research project in any manner, in whole or in part, for academic purposes may be granted by Van Hall Larenstein director of research. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this research project or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the university in any academic use which may be made of any material in my research project. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this research project in whole or part shall be addressed to: Director of Research Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences Forum- Gebouw 102 Droevendaalsesteeg 2 6708 PB, Wageningen Postbus 411 Tel: 0317- 486230 i Acknowledgements All the praises and thanks are to ALLAH, the LORD of mankind and all that exists. I thank ALLAH for giving me and my family good health throughout my studies. This work has been completed through a number of contributions from different organisations and individuals, just to mention few includes; The Royal Dutch Government through the Netherlands Fellowship Programme (NFP) for granting scholarship for my studies in Master of Agricultural Production Chain Management specialising in Livestock chains. Without this support, I wouldn’t undertake this valuable master degree. My sincere thanks go to my supervisor Mr. Frans Verweij for his tireless support, valuable inputs, encouragement and timely feedback. His efforts enlighten the success of this research. I appreciate the inputs of Mr. Marco Verschuur, our course coordinator for his continuous support from the beginning of my studies. These achievements would be difficult without his support. My special thanks go to all staffs and Lecturers of Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences for their support throughout my studies. I am very grateful to my organisation; Kongwa district council for giving me a study leave to undertake my studies. The inputs and positive cooperation from Mr. Heslon Kashalankoro manager of NARCO- Kongwa ranch, smallholder beef producers of Mautya, Machenje and Kongwa villages, village executive officers and extension workers of these villages, traders and input suppliers are highly appreciated. ii Dedication This work is dedicated to my lovely wife Fatuma Kaniki for encouragement, patience and for taking a good care of our son Adil during my absence and to my entire family especially my lovely mother, brothers and sisters. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PERMISSION TO USE ............................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... II DEDICATION.............................................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF PHOTOS .................................................................................................................... VI EQUIVALENTS ........................................................................................................................ VI ABREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... VII SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. VIII 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEM ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PROBLEM OWNER .......................................................................................................... 2 1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY ......................................................................................... 2 1.5 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................. 2 1.6 RESEARCH QUESTIONS .................................................................................................. 2 1.7 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................ 3 1.8 DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS .............................................................................................. 3 2.0 LINKING SMALLHOLDER BEEF PRODUCERS TO MARKETS ................................... 5 2.1 TYPES OF MARKET LINKAGES .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 BEEF PRODUCTION IN TANZANIA ..................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Demand conditions, beef marketing and marketing information ............................ 6 2.2.2 Market access challenges ..................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Beef production systems ....................................................................................... 9 2.2.4 Herd size, structure and dynamics .......................................................................10 2.2.5 Related and supporting industries ........................................................................10 2.2.6 Government regulations .......................................................................................11 2.2.7 Chance: Drought and diseases ............................................................................12 2.3 BEEF RANCHING ...........................................................................................................12 2.3.1 Ranch Management process ...............................................................................13 2.3.2 The National Ranching Company (NARCO) ........................................................14 3.0 METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................15 3.1 STUDY SITE ..................................................................................................................15 3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN .......................................................................................................16 3.2.1 Desk research ......................................................................................................16 3.2.2 Case study ...........................................................................................................17 3.2.3 Observations........................................................................................................17 3.2.4 Survey .................................................................................................................17 3.3 DATA PROCESSING .......................................................................................................18 4.0 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................20 4.1 RESULTS FROM THE CASE STUDY : .................................................................................20 4.1.1 Actors and their roles in the beef chains ..............................................................22 iv 4.2 RESULTS FROM THE SURVEY : ........................................................................................27 4.2.1 Smallholder beef producers’ demography ............................................................27 4.2.2 Relative share of each actor in the chains ............................................................29 4.2.3 Quality control measures existing in the beef chains ............................................29 4.2.4 Challenges facing smallholders, NARCO, traders and supporters .......................31 4.2.5 Impact of herd size and structure on market participation among smallholders ....32 4.2.6 Methods used by smallholder beef producers to access market information ........34 4.2.7 Criteria for competitive farmers to be linked to NARCO .......................................34 5.0 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................35 5.1 THE SITUATION OF BEEF SUBSECTOR IN KONGWA DISTRICT .............................................35 5.1.1 Actors and their roles in the beef chains ..............................................................35 5.1.2 Relative share of each actor in the chain .............................................................36
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Violence Within: Understanding the Use of Violent Practices Among Mexican Drug Traffickers
    Violence within: Understanding the Use of Violent Practices Among Mexican Drug Traffickers By Dr. Karina García JUSTICE IN MEXICO WORKING PAPER SERIES Volume 16, Number 2 November 2019 About Justice in Mexico: Started in 2001, Justice in Mexico (www.justiceinmexico.org) is a program dedicated to promoting analysis, informed public discourse, and policy decisions; and government, academic, and civic cooperation to improve public security, rule of law, and human rights in Mexico. Justice in Mexico advances its mission through cutting-edge, policy-focused research; public education and outreach; and direct engagement with policy makers, experts, and stakeholders. The program is presently based at the Department of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego (USD), and involves university faculty, students, and volunteers from the United States and Mexico. From 2005 to 2013, the program was based at USD’s Trans-Border Institute at the Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies, and from 2001 to 2005 it was based at the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies at the University of California-San Diego. About this Publication: This paper forms part of the Justice in Mexico working paper series, which includes recent works in progress on topics related to crime and security, rule of law, and human rights in Mexico. All working papers can be found on the Justice in Mexico website: www.justiceinmexico.org. The research for this paper involved in depth interviews with over thirty participants in violent aspects of the Mexican drug trade, and sheds light on the nature and purposes of violent activities conducted by Mexican organized crime groups.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVELIHOODS in TANZANIA Impact Evaluation of the ‘Optimizing Income of Local Chicken and Sunflower Smallholder Producers’ Project
    EVALUATION: JULY 2016 PUBLICATION: OCTOBER 2017 LIVELIHOODS IN TANZANIA Impact evaluation of the ‘Optimizing income of local chicken and sunflower smallholder producers’ project Effectiveness Review Series 2016/17 ANDREW ANGUKO and MASUD RANA OXFAM GB www.oxfam.org.uk/effectiveness CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Project description .............................................................................................. 10 3 Evaluation design ................................................................................................ 13 4 Data collection ..................................................................................................... 15 5 Results .................................................................................................................. 18 6 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 35 Appendix 1: Baseline statistics before matching ................................................. 37 Appendix 2: Methodology used for propensity score matching ......................... 39 Appendix 3: Robustness checks ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Decentralisation-Centralisation Dilemma: Recruitment And
    BMC International Health and Human Rights BioMed Central Research article Open Access The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania Michael A Munga*1,2, Nils Gunnar Songstad1, Astrid Blystad3,1 and Ottar Mæstad4 Address: 1Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 2Department of Health Systems and Policy Research, National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 3Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care (ISF), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway and 4Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway Email: Michael A Munga* - [email protected]; Nils Gunnar Songstad - [email protected]; Astrid Blystad - [email protected]; Ottar Mæstad - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 April 2009 Received: 8 September 2008 Accepted: 30 April 2009 BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:9 doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-9 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/9 © 2009 Munga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The implementation of decentralisation reforms in the health sector of Tanzania started in the 1980s. These reforms were intended to relinquish substantial powers and resources to districts to improve the development of the health sector. Little is known about the impact of decentralisation on recruitment and distribution of health workers at the district level.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Academy Awards
    2019 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Comedy Series A.P. Bio Abby's After Life American Housewife American Vandal Arrested Development Atypical Ballers Barry Better Things The Big Bang Theory The Bisexual Black Monday black-ish Bless This Mess Boomerang Broad City Brockmire Brooklyn Nine-Nine Camping Casual Catastrophe Champaign ILL Cobra Kai The Conners The Cool Kids Corporate Crashing Crazy Ex-Girlfriend Dead To Me Detroiters Easy Fam Fleabag Forever Fresh Off The Boat Friends From College Future Man Get Shorty GLOW The Goldbergs The Good Place Grace And Frankie grown-ish The Guest Book Happy! High Maintenance Huge In France I’m Sorry Insatiable Insecure It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia Jane The Virgin Kidding The Kids Are Alright The Kominsky Method Last Man Standing The Last O.G. Life In Pieces Loudermilk Lunatics Man With A Plan The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel Modern Family Mom Mr Inbetween Murphy Brown The Neighborhood No Activity Now Apocalypse On My Block One Day At A Time The Other Two PEN15 Queen America Ramy The Ranch Rel Russian Doll Sally4Ever Santa Clarita Diet Schitt's Creek Schooled Shameless She's Gotta Have It Shrill Sideswiped Single Parents SMILF Speechless Splitting Up Together Stan Against Evil Superstore Tacoma FD The Tick Trial & Error Turn Up Charlie Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt Veep Vida Wayne Weird City What We Do in the Shadows Will & Grace You Me Her You're the Worst Young Sheldon Younger End of Category Outstanding Drama Series The Affair All American American Gods American Horror Story: Apocalypse American Soul Arrow Berlin Station Better Call Saul Billions Black Lightning Black Summer The Blacklist Blindspot Blue Bloods Bodyguard The Bold Type Bosch Bull Chambers Charmed The Chi Chicago Fire Chicago Med Chicago P.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solve It Squad to the (Dog) Rescue!
    The Solve It Squad to the (Dog) Rescue! written by Brian Rosenthal, Corey Lubowich, & Joey Richter Tin Can Bros V1 COLD OPEN 1 INT. SOLVE IT SQUAD CLUBHOUSE - DAY 1 The SQUAD is jammed into the old Solve It Squad HQ, a treehouse adorned with maps, drawings, and memorabilia from their childhood exploits. It's way too small for four adults in their thirties. KEITH, a delusional bro who likely peaked in high school, attempts to take charge. KEITH Alright, Squad! Let’s get to work. POV of Instagram where GWEN is livestreaming their meeting. She feigns the bubbliness of an influencer with ease, relentlessly shrewd in her pursuit of the limelight. GWEN Yes, the rumors are true. The Solve It Squad is back in biz. Keith, tell them what we're doing. Keith enters frame, and the flurry of hearts on the screen instantly turn to thumbs-down emojis. KEITH Sure thing, babe. Looks like we got BIG trouble at the LITTLE Mayberry Zoo. It seems, Fam, that their one and only, fur-rocious tiger has gone missing. SCRAGS, a straight-laced, gangly, and slightly jumpy man, interrupts. SCRAGS Easy there, Keith. The details of squad operations should remain within the squad. Bad guys have Instagram too. Gwen flips the camera back to herself. GWEN Ooo. Hot take, Scrags! What do y'all think? Send a Kissy Face if you agree!! ESTHER scoffs. They are brilliant, paranoid, and heavily self-medicated. 2. ESTHER (sarcastically) Great idea, Gwen. I'm sure you'll get thoughtful feedback from all those Russian bots.
    [Show full text]
  • Social-Economic Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT KONGWA DISTRICT SOCIAL-ECONOMIC PROFILE District Executive Director, P.O Box 57, KONGWA. Tel: 026 2320537 Fax. 026 2320537 Email: [email protected] August, 2016 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This description comprises six chapters. The first chapter introduces the Council of Kongwa focusing on land, climatic condition, agro-ecological zones as well as its people. Kongwa ward is the seat of the District Headquarter. The town started as a centre for German Colonial activities in 1942 following establishment of groundnuts estates. The choice of its location strategically made to fertile soil suitable for groundnuts cultivation and accessibility to road. The town also has historical roots that associate it with the great Gogo tribe. Overtime, the town has redefined and extended its role, eventually becoming a centre for social and economic development for the hinterlands as a whole. The administrative area comprises a total of 22 wards, 87 villages, 383 suburbs and 2 township authorities. The distribution of wards include Sejeli, Kongwa, Sagara, Chamkoroma, Pandambili, Lenjulu, Chiwe, Kibaigwa, Mtanana, Njoge, Ngomai, Mkoka, Matongoro, Makawa, Chitego, Hogoro, Songambele, Zoissa, Iduo, Mlali, Nghumbi and Ugogoni. The District Economy The main economic activities in the council are farming, livestock keeping and informal sector activities. Overall, the industrial sector has been in a gradual development and scaling up their activities. This can be observed from small industries growing for processing cooking oil such as sunflower and groundnuts. This chapter covers the District GDP and average income (per capita), trade and cooperatives, annual budgeting, housing and unplanned settlements as well as informal sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Timber Pioneer | Thursday, November 12, 2020
    PIONEERTHE BIG TIMBER WWW.BIGTIMBERPIONEER.NET $1 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2020 | VOL. 132 NO. 6 Local marine returns home after nearly five years of active duty By G.Q. Hansen month security detail in the rugged Pioneer Staff Writer battle-scarred region of Afghani- stan, the graveyard of empires. losing five years of “It gave me a new perspective active duty and making just how good we have it,” he said. his way around the “People think everything sucks but globe, corporal Ian Gar- it could always be worse.” cia finally returned When asked what Afghanistan Chome to Big Timber late last month. was like, he said with a smile, After spanning the continents, “hot.” grasping cultures and christened in The base he would be stationed faraway customs, Garcia, of 1st at was attacked prior to his arrival Batallion, 7th Marines, has jour- and he mentioned there was antici- neyed home with a Navy and pation, that the troops were expect- Marine Corps. Achievement Medal ing something again. to his name. “You settle into a rhythm after a After he graduated from Sweet while and realize the bombs going Grass County High School, Garcia off, ‘alright that’s normal,’” he said. remembered lightheartedly coach- His company was tasked with ing his last Little Herder football providing security detail for mili- game before he left a few days lat- tary advisors to Afghan forces and er for the employ of the Comman- instructing soldiers within the dant, for God and Country, in the province. A duty that seemed frus- United States Marine Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Total Sanitation: Notes from a Field Trip and Workshop on Scaling up in Africa
    The Road to Total Sanitation: Notes from a field trip and workshop on scaling up in Africa The Road to Total Sanitation: Notes from a field trip and workshop on scaling up in Africa 23-24 July 2010 In July 2010, six organizations came together to study and discuss current prospects for scaling up access to sanitation and hygiene inVon East Africa. The group started with a trip to the field – visiting various projects in Tanzania that, between them, represent a range of approaches to improving access to sanitation and changing hygiene practices. The objective was not to evaluate or critique individual projects, but rather to look for overarching principles: what works; what doesn’t work; what are the gaps in our knowledge; how can working in partnership help us achieve our aims; what barriers do we need to overcome in order to extend the benefits of such projects to all people across Africa. These notes reflect the conclusions, recommendations and lessons learned from this trip. They are based on a two-day workshop that was held directly following the trip. Further detailed notes, photos, and video material can be found in the appendices. In addition, it is planned that various databanks of reports, photos and videos will be developed and made available via the web. In December 2009, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation organized a meeting on the topic of scaling up on-site sanitation. Following this meeting, WSP convened a meeting of partners to explore how issues raised at the Gates meeting could be taken forward in East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Alamosa City Ranch Master Plan
    2018 Alamosa City Ranch Master Plan Planning Division – Public Works Dept. City of Alamosa 11/2/2018 ALAMOSA CITY RANCH MASTER PLAN 2018 December 5, 2018 City of Alamosa Planning Division – Public Works Department P.O. Box 419 300 Hunt Avenue Alamosa, Colorado 81101 (719) 589-6631 i Table of Contents ALAMOSA CITY RANCH ........................................................................................ i MASTER PLAN ...................................................................................................... i 2018..................................................................................................................... i Background ......................................................................................................... 5 Brief Background and History of the Alamosa City Ranch ................................ 5 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 6 Location .......................................................................................................... 6 Irrigation and Water Rights ............................................................................. 6 Soils Characteristics ........................................................................................ 8 Soils Map ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Habitat Assessment Based on Soil Survey ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Utilities Performance Review Report for Fy 2018/19
    WATER UTILITIES PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT FOR FY 2018/19 DISTRICT AND TOWNSHIP WATER UTILITIES March 2020 i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT .......................................................................................................................................................... vi FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................................................................... vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................... viii MEASUREMENT UNITS AND SYMBOLS ................................................................................................................................. xi DEFINITIONS OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ......................................................................................................... x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................................. xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ..............................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Water Sources ................................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview of the Heinz Ranch, South Parcel (Approximately 1378 Acres) for the Stone Gate Master Planned Community, Washoe County, Nevada
    Cultural Resources Overview of the Heinz Ranch, South Parcel (approximately 1378 acres) for the Stone Gate Master Planned Community, Washoe County, Nevada Project Number: 2016-110-1 Submitted to: Heinz Ranch Company, LLCt 2999 Oak Road, Suite 400 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared by: Michael Drews Dayna Giambastiani, MA, RPA Great Basin Consulting Group, LLC. 200 Winters Drive Carson City, Nevada 89703 July7, 2016 G-1 Summary Heinz Ranch was established in 1855 by Frank Heinz, an emigrant from Germany, who together with his wife Wilhelmina, turned it into a profitable cow and calf operation (Nevada Department of Agriculture 2016). In 2004, Heinz Ranch received the Nevada Centennial Ranch and Farm award from the Nevada Department of Agriculture for being an active ranch for over 100 years. A Class II archaeological investigation of the property was conducted in May and June 2016. Several prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded on the property. Habitation sites hold the potential for additional research and have previously been determined eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. Historic sites relating to mining and transportation along with the ranching landscape are also prominent. Architectural resources on the property consist of several barns, outbuildings and residences. The barns are notable for their method of construction. Many are constructed of hand hewn posts and beams, and assembled with pegged mortise and tenon joinery. They date to the earliest use of the ranch. Residences generally date to the 1930s. Historic sites and resources located on Heinz Ranch provide an opportunity for more scholarly research into the prehistory and history of Cold Springs Valley (also Laughton’s Valley) and the region in general.
    [Show full text]