DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Map and Classification of Fish Slough Inyo and Mono

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation Map and Classification of Fish Slough Inyo and Mono VEGETATION MAP AND CLASSIFICATION OF FISH SLOUGH INYO AND MONO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program Biogeographic Data Branch California Department of Fish and Wildlife January 2014 ABSTRACT A fine-scale vegetation classification and map of a portion of the Fish Slough Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) (including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Fish Slough Ecological Reserve) in Inyo and Mono Counties, California, was created by the CDFW Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP). The vegetation classification is derived from floristic field survey data collected during September 2011, November 2012 and June 2013 and is based on previously described Alliances and Associations, with a few new provisional types included. The map was produced using heads-up digitizing using true-color 2012 1-meter National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery as the base. Supplemental imagery included 2012 1-meter NAIP Color Infrared and imagery available through Bing Maps and Google Earth. The minimum mapping unit (MMU) is 1 acre for upland habitats and ¼-acre for wetland habitats. Field reconnaissance and field verification enhanced map quality. The final map includes a total of 365 polygons representing 40 vegetation map classes. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the VegCAMP program wish to thank the following individuals for their assistance: Mark Bagley Joy Fatooh, BLM Sally Manning and Daniel Pritchett Troy Kelly, DFW Steve Nelson, BLM Martin Oliver, BLM We apologize to anyone we may have left off this list unintentionally. PROJECT STAFF VegCAMP field staff included: Rachelle Boul, Mary Jo Colletti, Joslyn Curtis, Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Gina Radieve, and Rosie Yacoub. Additional field staff from the Department’s regional office included: Rose Banks, Alisa Ellsworth, and Veronica Holmes. Data entry was completed by Mary Jo Colletti; mapping and attribution were completed by Rachelle Boul, Anne Klein, and Gina Radieve. The report was written by Gina Radieve and Mary Jo Colletti with input from VegCAMP staff. The key was written by Todd Keeler-Wolf and Anne Klein. i CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................ i Project Staff ........................................................................................................................................................................ i Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Field Data Sampling Methods and Data Storage ........................................................................................................... 1 Classification Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Classification .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Delineation Rules and Map Attributes ........................................................................................................................... 6 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Map Verification ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 FIGURES Figure 1: Location of the Fish Slough mapping area .......................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2: Map showing current vegetation, and locations and vegetation types of transect points from Odion . ........ 12 Figure 3: Vegetation change at Fish Slough, 1990 - 2010 ................................................................................................ 14 TABLES Table 1: Summary of mapped vegetation types and corresponding acreage ................................................................... 9 Table 2: Comparison between vegetation types from the Odion et al. (1991) study and current mapped types ......... 13 ii APPENDICES Appendix A: CNPS and CDFW Combined Vegetation Rapid Assessment and Relevé Protocol Appendix B: Field Data Collection Forms Appendix C: Hierarchical Field and Mapping Key Appendix D: Plant Species in Fish Slough Mapping Area Appendix E: Crosswalk iii PURPOSE The purpose of this vegetation map and classification is to assist in management and long-term vegetation monitoring of the Fish Slough Ecological Reserve and ACEC. This effort will help document spatial and temporal changes in vegetation composition, including response to management actions. The map was requested by the Fish Slough ACEC Joint Management Committee. The mapping area (Figure 1) is “Zone 1” of the ACEC; the Fish Slough Ecological Reserve is completely included within this zone. Figure 1: Location of the Fish Slough mapping area METHODS FIELD DATA SAMPLING METHODS AND DATA STORAGE Relevé data from 17 vegetation stands and Rapid Assessment (RA) data from 30 vegetation stands were collected during initial field work conducted September 12-16, 2011, using the California Native Plant Society’s Combined Rapid Assessment and Relevé Sampling Protocol (Appendix A). These data include the date of sampling, GPS location, Page 1 environmental characteristics of the sampled stands, vegetation, site history, and the field-assessed vegetation type. Additionally, four digital photos were taken in the cardinal directions from the GPS point for each survey location. Complete species lists were recorded for plot-based Relevé surveys, while the most dominant and/or characteristic species were recorded for stand-based Rapid Assessment surveys. Percent cover estimates were recorded for all species listed in Relevés and RAs. A number of the relevé and rapid assessment samples were taken at points that were previously sampled by Odion et al. (1991) to see if we could determine any obvious vegetation change over the 20 years. To recreate these point locations, the map in the published report was scanned and georeferenced in ArcGIS, and the point labels interpreted off this map. During the September, 2011 sampling effort, 73 field reconnaissance data points were collected to aid in identifying vegetation signatures and to determine where to delineate polygons. At each reconnaissance location, a GPS point was taken and observations were recorded for vegetation type. Sometimes additional data, such as photos, site history, observational notes on stand composition and environmental attributes, cover by stratum ,and/or cover by dominant/indicator species were recorded as well. Reconnaissance points were frequently taken to mark the transition from one vegetation type to another, in order to help the photointerpreter locate the boundaries of stands. A preliminary vegetation map was produced using the data collected in 2011. During two subsequent field sampling trips (November 6-8, 2012 and June 24-28, 2013), 377 field verification points were collected to validate and revise the initial map product. Field verification survey data included percent cover estimates for dominant and/or indicator species with homogeneous distribution across a stand, photographs, cover estimates by stratum, categorical ranking of exotic species cover in a stand, and approximate percentage of the polygon viewed. Appendix B includes samples of the three different field data collection forms used in this project. All sample point locations were collected with GPS-enabled PDAs, either Trimble “Junos” or F4 Devices “Flints.” Spatial data were stored in a single ESRI geodatabase feature class. Relevé and RA data from paper field forms, including plant species and cover information, were entered into VegCAMP’s Combined Rapid Assessment and Relevé Database (MS Access format). Reconnaissance and field verification data were entered directly into the geodatabase feature class, with plant species information in a separate table in the geodatabase. Ground photos as described above were filed by the unique identifying code for each sample location and are available from VegCAMP. See Appendix C for a complete list of plant species observed at the Fish Slough mapping area. CLASSIFICATION METHODS The map classification is based largely on existing vegetation types described in the Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer et al. 2009), but includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Psorothamnus Arborescens Var. Pubescens (Parish) Barneby Marble Canyon Dalea
    TOC Page | 117 Psorothamnus arborescens var. pubescens (Parish) Barneby Marble Canyon Dalea Family: Fabaceae Synonyms: None NESL Status: G4 Federal Status: None Plant Description: Armed shrubs 4-10 dm tall; leaves 1.4-3.8cm long, leaflets 7-15, glandular beneath, strigose on both sides. Racemes 11-21 flowered, 1.8-4.5cm long. Calyx 8-10mm long, the tube 3.8- 4.8mm long, 10-ribbed, villous, the teeth 3.6-5.2mm long, linear-lanceolate, as long as the tube; flowers 8.1-10.6 mm long, indigo; valves of pods with large, round, discrete yellowish or orange blister glands, pubescent between blister glands. Flowering and fruiting from May to June. Similar species: Differs consistently from P. fremontii only in the ornamentation of the pod. P. fremontii has small orange glands that are confluent lengthwise into crowded ridges towards the pod’s beak. P. arborescens has large round blister glands separated from one another by spaces as wide as their diameter. Habitat: On soils derived from the Moenkopi Formation in mixed desert shrub communities between 3400 – 4900ft Distribution: Endemic Northern Coconino County, AZ, in the vicinity of Marble Canyon. Navajo Nation Distribution: Currently only known from Navajo Springs area, south of Navajo Bridge. Potential Navajo Nation Distribution: Lee’s Backbone to Bitter Springs. Recommended Survey Period: Proper identification is only possible during the flowering and fruiting period in May and June. Recommended Avoidance: A 200 ft buffer zone is recommended to avoid disturbance; may be more or less depending on size and nature of the project. References: Arizona Rare Plant Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • CNPS Bristlecone Chapter Newsletter
    Dedicated to the Preservation of California Native Flora The California Native Plant Society Bristlecone Chapter Newsletter Volume 38, No. 2 March-April 2017 President’s Message March 2017 There is also some correspondence of thanking donors once in a while. If you would like to take on It is raining again today, a strong steady rain. the role, contact Katie at Although the weather has changed my plans about [email protected]. skiing I can only smile and think how the plants must feel soaking up all this much needed moisture. I am “It is the action, not the fruit of the action that's anxious to see how this winter water will affect the important. You have to do the right thing. It may not restoration plantings that were put into the burned be in your power, may not be in your time, that there areas last fall and hope that the added soil moisture will be any fruit. That doesn't mean you stop doing the will increase the success rate of the seedlings. I right thing. You may never know what results come imagine all this water will make for a pretty good from your action. But if you do nothing, there will be no flower season this year as well and we have some result.” — Gandhi good field trips lined up to enjoy the spring bloom; so — Katie Quinlan check those out in this newsletter and mark the dates on your calendars. WeDnesDay, March 29, 7 PM, General Meeting, White Mountain Research Center, To get ready for the spring gardening season we have 3000 E.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Herbaceous Tidal Wetland Communities of Maryland's
    HERBACEOUS TIDAL WETLAND COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND’S EASTERN SHORE 30 June 2001 HERBACEOUS TIDAL WETLAND COMMUNITIES OF MARYLAND’S EASTERN SHORE: Identification, Assessment and Monitoring Report Submitted To: The United States Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act 1998 State Wetlands Protection Development Grant Program Report Submitted By: Jason W. Harrison for The Biodiversity Program Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Division 30 June 2001 [U.S. EPA Reference Wetland Natural Communities of Maryland’s Herbaceous Tidal Wetlands Grant # CD993724] Maryland Herbaceous Tidal Wetlands Vegetation Classification / Description and Reference Sites FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................5 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................8 Methods ......................................................................................................................................9 Landscape Analysis .........................................................................................................9 Spatial Distribution of Vegetation: Implications for Sampling Design..............................9 Field Surveys.................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation
    National Wetlands Inventory Map Report for Quinault Indian Nation Project ID(s): R01Y19P01: Quinault Indian Nation, fiscal year 2019 Project area The project area (Figure 1) is restricted to the Quinault Indian Nation, bounded by Grays Harbor Co. Jefferson Co. and the Olympic National Park. Appendix A: USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangles: Queets, Salmon River West, Salmon River East, Matheny Ridge, Tunnel Island, O’Took Prairie, Thimble Mountain, Lake Quinault West, Lake Quinault East, Taholah, Shale Slough, Macafee Hill, Stevens Creek, Moclips, Carlisle. • < 0. Figure 1. QIN NWI+ 2019 project area (red outline). Source Imagery: Citation: For all quads listed above: See Appendix A Citation Information: Originator: USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office Publication Date: 2017 Publication place: Salt Lake City, Utah Title: Digital Orthoimagery Series of Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data Other_Citation_Details: 1-meter and 1-foot, Natural Color and NIR-False Color Collateral Data: . USGS 1:24,000 topographic quadrangles . USGS – NHD – National Hydrography Dataset . USGS Topographic maps, 2013 . QIN LiDAR DEM (3 meter) and synthetic stream layer, 2015 . Previous National Wetlands Inventories for the project area . Soil Surveys, All Hydric Soils: Weyerhaeuser soil survey 1976, NRCS soil survey 2013 . QIN WET tables, field photos, and site descriptions, 2016 to 2019, Janice Martin, and Greg Eide Inventory Method: Wetland identification and interpretation was done “heads-up” using ArcMap versions 10.6.1. US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping contractors in Portland, Oregon completed the original aerial photo interpretation and wetland mapping. Primary authors: Nicholas Jones of SWCA Environmental Consulting. 100% Quality Control (QC) during the NWI mapping was provided by Michael Holscher of SWCA Environmental Consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Investigation for Blm Sensitive Rare Plant Species Within the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area, Souhwestern Idaho Interim Report, 2000
    FIELD INVESTIGATION FOR BLM SENSITIVE RARE PLANT SPECIES WITHIN THE SNAKE RIVER BIRDS OF PREY NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA, SOUHWESTERN IDAHO INTERIM REPORT, 2000 By Michael Mancuso and Christopher Murphy Conservation Data Center March 2001 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Rod Sando, Director Challenge Cost-Share Project Lower Snake River District BLM Idaho Department of Fish and Game Agreement No. DAA000203 ABSTRACT The Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area (NCA) encompasses over 480,000 acres of public land along 80 miles of the Snake River in southwestern Idaho. Although the NCA is best known for its great density of nesting raptors, other biodiversity values also exist, including a diverse suite and relative abundance of rare plant species. Sixteen Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Sensitive plant species are known to occur within the NCA. In 2000, the BLM’s Lower Snake River District contracted with the Idaho Conservation Data Center to conduct a systematic field investigation for Sensitive plant species on the NCA. The project’s purpose is to provide the BLM with a conservation assessment of rare plant resources within the NCA. Field investigations in 2000 discovered a total of 51 new rare plant occurrences within the NCA. New occurrences were found for nine of the 16 target species. We also obtained updated information for 33 occurrences previously known from the study area. This report summarizes first-year results of this two-year project. An appendix contains Element Occurrence Records for all the new and updated occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Crops for the Columbia Basin: Resource
    ALTERNATIVE CROPS FOR THE COLUMBIA BASIN: RESOURCE Jerry Igo, Stephen Machado, Brian Tuck, Sandy Macnab, Jordan Maley 2003 1 PREFACE For several years the ability to farm the lands of the Columbia Basin profitably has been diminishing. There are many reasons for this, among which are that the consistently low grain prices have not kept pace with the increases in costs of farming. Labor costs, the price of new machinery, of fertilizer and pesticides, of transportation, accounting, and heavy brokerage fees, have all combined to cause many wheat ranchers to look for new sources of income. The purpose of this report is to explore some of these possibilities. They include but are not limited to OILSEED, FOOD, FORAGE, SEEDS AND STEMS FOR REVEGETATION, CROPS WHICH ENRICH THE SOIL AND/OR REDUCE THE THREAT OF DESEASE TO THE PRIMARY CROPS. During the course of investigation of these possibilities, inquiries have been made into products of other nations, of lands with similar soils and rainfall. A search of native plant species which might show promise has been conducted, with experts in the field involved. Please see the bibliography and reference material section. For purposes of clarity the format which is being used is separated into three categories. GRASSES AND CEREAL GRAINS, BROADLEAVED HERBS AND FORBS, and SHRUBS AND TREES. Each of these have alphabetical indexing of common names. There is as well a central index of common and scientific nomenclature. While no expectation is offered that this is exhaustively researched, it should provide those who are searching for other crop choices for the Columbia Basin, a considerable pool of possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Battle Battle Mountain Office District
    BLM U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District Office Mountain Battle Gold Bar Exploration Project Resource Report 23 Appendices DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2018-0038-EA Preparing Office Battle Mountain District Office 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, NV 89820 December 2018 GOLD BAR RESOURCE REPORT 23 APPENDICES Appendix A – Summary of Findings Appendix B – BLM Sensitive Species List APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Summary of Environmental Consequences RR # Resource Subtopic Context Duration Intensity Significance Summary Exploration activities will be exploratory and not extractive. Surface disturbances during exploration activities will consist primarily of the creation of new exploration roads, drill pits, and sumps. At any given time within the 17,316-acre EPO Area, a maximum of 100 acres of unreleased Proposed Action-related disturbance will exist. Release of reclaimed lands 3 Geology & Minerals --- Localized Short-term Negligible Not Significant could occur as early as the third growing season as stated in the BLM and NDEP bond release policy. Overall, it is anticipated that the program will be conducted over 10 years with total unreleased disturbance not exceeding 100 acres at any point in time and with a total project reclaimed disturbance not exceeding 200 acres (based on concurrent reclamation being released for future phases of exploration activities). Changes in runoff distribution would be negligible and the overall effect on surface water resource would be negligible. The Proposed Action is expected to have a negligible effect on snowmelt recharge to shallow groundwater within EPO Surface Water Localized Short-term Negligible Not Significant Area. BMPs to control stormwater, sediment erosion, and protect surface water resources from pollution related to surface disturbance activities would be implemented to reduce the potential for temporary effects to water quality.
    [Show full text]