Zac4943-2Ch105t.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No.: US 10,561,6759 B2 Griffith Et Al
US010561675B2 United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No.: US 10,561,6759 B2 Griffith et al. (45 ) Date of Patent : * Feb . 18 , 2020 (54 ) CYCLIC BORONIC ACID ESTER ( 58 ) Field of Classification Search DERIVATIVES AND THERAPEUTIC USES CPC A61K 31/69 ; A61K 31/396 ; A61K 31/40 ; THEREOF A61K 31/419677 (71 ) Applicant: Rempex Pharmaceuticals , Inc. , (Continued ) Lincolnshire , IL (US ) (56 ) References Cited (72 ) Inventors : David C. Griffith , San Marcos, CA (US ) ; Michael N. Dudley , San Diego , U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS CA (US ) ; Olga Rodny , Mill Valley , CA 4,194,047 A 3/1980 Christensen et al . ( US ) 4,260,543 A 4/1981 Miller ( 73 ) Assignee : REMPEX PHARMACEUTICALS , ( Continued ) INC . , Lincolnshire , IL (US ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this EP 1550657 A1 7/2005 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 JP 2003-229277 A 8/2003 U.S.C. 154 ( b ) by 1129 days. (Continued ) This patent is subject to a terminal dis claimer . OTHER PUBLICATIONS Abdel -Magid et al. , “ Reductive Amination ofAldehydes and Ketones ( 21) Appl. No .: 13 /843,579 with Sodium Triacetoxyborohydride: Studies on Direct and Indirect Reductive Amination Procedures ” , J Org Chem . ( 1996 )61 ( 11 ): 3849 ( 22 ) Filed : Mar. 15 , 2013 3862 . (65 ) Prior Publication Data (Continued ) US 2013/0331355 A1 Dec. 12 , 2013 Primary Examiner — Shengjun Wang Related U.S. Application Data (74 ) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Wilmer Cutler Pickering (60 ) Provisional application No.61 / 656,452 , filed on Jun . Hale and Dorr LLP 6 , 2012 (57 ) ABSTRACT (51 ) Int. Ci. A61K 31/69 ( 2006.01) Method of treating or ameliorating a bacterial infection A61K 31/00 ( 2006.01 ) comprising administering a composition comprising a cyclic (Continued ) boronic acid ester compound in combination with a car ( 52 ) U.S. -
General Items
Essential Medicines List (EML) 2019 Application for the inclusion of imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, as reserve second-line drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (complementary lists of anti-tuberculosis drugs for use in adults and children) General items 1. Summary statement of the proposal for inclusion, change or deletion This application concerns the updating of the forthcoming WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) and WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children (EMLc) to include the following medicines: 1) Imipenem/cilastatin (Imp-Cln) to the main list but NOT the children’s list (it is already mentioned on both lists as an option in section 6.2.1 Beta Lactam medicines) 2) Meropenem (Mpm) to both the main and the children’s lists (it is already on the list as treatment for meningitis in section 6.2.1 Beta Lactam medicines) 3) Clavulanic acid to both the main and the children’s lists (it is already listed as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (Amx-Clv), the only commercially available preparation of clavulanic acid, in section 6.2.1 Beta Lactam medicines) This application makes reference to amendments recommended in particular to section 6.2.4 Antituberculosis medicines in the latest editions of both the main EML (20th list) and the EMLc (6th list) released in 2017 (1),(2). On the basis of the most recent Guideline Development Group advising WHO on the revision of its guidelines for the treatment of multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR-TB)(3), the applicant considers that the three agents concerned be viewed as essential medicines for these forms of TB in countries. -
In Vitro and in Vivo Study of Fosfomycin in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Septicaemia
J. Ilyg., Camb. (1980), 96, 419-423 419 Printed in Great Britain In vitro and in vivo study of fosfomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia BY W. Y. LAU, C. H. TEOH-CHAN,* S. T. FAN AND K. F. LAU* Government Surgical Unit, Queen Mary Hospital, and * Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong {Received 15 October 19S5; accepted 12 December 19S5) SUMMARY Five hundred strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were tested against various anti-staphylococcal agents. Vancomycin, fusidic acid and fosfo- mycin were found to be the most effective. Only 1 strain out of 500 was resistant to fosfomycin. Three patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia were successfully treated by fosfomycin. We conclude that fosfomycin could be the drug of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcns aureus infection. INTRODUCTION Outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection are causing increasing problems in centres all over the world (Thompson & Wenzel, 1982; Editorial, 1983). There has been a gradual increase in the incidence of MRSA in our hospital in Hong Kong from 317 in 1982 (18-7% of all S. aureus isolated) to 511 in 1983 (32-7%) and 833 in 1984 (34-9%). In vitro, resistance of MRSA is often demonstrated to many anti-staphylococcal agents including the penicillins, first-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, erythromycin, clindamycin and chloramphenicol (Peacock et al. 1981). Second- and third-generation cephalosporins also have poor activity in vitro (Thompson, Fisher & Wenzel, 1982) though many MRSA strains have been found to be susceptible to rifampicin, trimethoprim- sulphamethoxazole and fusidic acid (Watanakunakorn, 1983). However, clinical experience of treating serious staphylococeal infection with rifampicin and trimethoprim-siilphamethoxazole is limited (Guenther & Wenzel, 1984) and fully resistant organisms may emerge rapidly after exposure to fusidic acid in vitro and in vivo (Watanakunakorn, 1983). -
Acinetobacter Baumannii in a Murine Thigh-Infection Model
RESEARCH ARTICLE Activity of Colistin in Combination with Meropenem, Tigecycline, Fosfomycin, Fusidic Acid, Rifampin or Sulbactam against Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Murine Thigh-Infection Model Bing Fan1,2☯, Jie Guan3☯, Xiumei Wang4, Yulong Cong1* 1 Clinical Laboratory of South Building, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, a11111 China, 2 Clinical Laboratory of the Second Clinical District, the General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China, 3 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China, 4 Department of Clinical Laboratory, the General Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Fan B, Guan J, Wang X, Cong Y (2016) Abstract Activity of Colistin in Combination with Meropenem, Tigecycline, Fosfomycin, Fusidic Acid, Rifampin or Few effective therapeutic options are available for treating severe infections caused by Sulbactam against Extensively Drug-Resistant extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDR-AB). Using a murine thigh-infec- Acinetobacter baumannii in a Murine Thigh-Infection tion model, we examined the in vivo efficacy of colistin in combination with meropenem, tige- Model. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157757. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0157757 cycline, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, rifampin, or sulbactam against 12 XDR-AB strains. Colistin, tigecycline, rifampin, and sulbactam monotherapy significantly decreased bacterial Editor: Digby F. Warner, University of Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA counts in murine thigh infections compared with those observed in control mice receiving no treatment. Colistin was the most effective agent tested, displaying bactericidal activity Received: February 13, 2016 against 91.7% of strains at 48 h post-treatment. -
WO 2018/005606 Al 04 January 2018 (04.01.2018) W !P O PCT
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/005606 Al 04 January 2018 (04.01.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, A61K 38/43 (2006.01) A61K 47/36 (2006.01) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, A61K 38/50 (2006.01) A61K 9/S0 (2006.01) OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, A61K 33/44 {2006.01) SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY,TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (21) International Application Number: PCT/US20 17/039672 (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (22) International Filing Date: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, 28 June 2017 (28.06.2017) UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (25) Filing Language: English TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (26) Publication Langi English MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, (30) Priority Data: TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, 62/355,599 28 June 2016 (28.06.2016) US KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,680,136 B2 Hirst Et Al
USOO868O136B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,680,136 B2 Hirst et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 25, 2014 (54) CYCLIC BORONIC ACID ESTER WO WOO3,O70714 8, 2003 DERVATIVES AND THERAPEUTCUSES WO WO 2004/039859 5, 2004 THEREOF WO WO 2005/033090 4/2005 WO WO 2007/095638 8, 2007 WO WO 2009/046098 A1 4, 2009 (75) Inventors: Gavin Hirst, San Diego, CA (US); Raja WO WO 2009/064413 A1 5, 2009 Reddy, San Diego, CA (US); Scott WO WO 2009/064414 A1 5.2009 Hecker, Del Mar, CA (US); Maxim WO WO 2009/140309 A2 11/2009 Totroy San Deigo, CA (US); David C. WO WO 2010/1307082010/075286 A1 11,T 2010 Griffith, San Marcos, CA (US): Olga WO WO 2011/O17125 A1 2/2011 Rodny, Mill Valley, CA (US); Michael N. Dudley, San Diego, CA (US); Serge OTHER PUBLICATIONS Boyer, San Diego, CA (US) Fanetal (2009): STN International HCAPLUS database, Columbus (73) Assignee: Rempex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San (OH), accession No. 2009: 425839.* Diego, CA (US) Vasil'ev et al (1977): STN International HCAPLUS database, Columbus (OH), accession No. 1977: 72730.* (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Allen et al., “Ansel's Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Deliv patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ery Systems', 8th Edition (2004). U.S.C. 154(b) by 9 days. Arya et al., “Advances in asymmetric enolate methodology'. Tetra hedron (2000) 56:917-947. (21) Appl. No.: 13/205,112 Biedrzycki et al., “Derivatives of tetrahedral boronic acids”. J. Organomet. Chem. -
Thienamycin (Imipenem)
1520 THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS OCT. 1989 CONVERSION OF OA-6129 B2 INTO OA-6129 B2, a fermentation carbapenem product, (5i?,6^)-6-[(i?)- l -FLUOROETHYL]-7- into optically active 88617, an 8-fluorinated OXO- 3 -[(7V,Ar,Ar-TRIM ETHYL- carbapenem derivative which improved antimicro- CARBAMIMIDOYL)METHYL]THIO- bial activity and dehydropeptidase-I stability. l -AZABICYCLO[3.2.0]HEPT-2-ENE- Treatment of OA-6129B2 sodium salt 1 with 2-CARBOXYLIC ACID (88617)t /7-nitrobenzyl (PNB) bromide or pivaloyloxymethyl chloride in DMFgave /?NB ester 2 or pivaloyl- Takeo Yoshioka, AzumaWatanabe, oxymethyl (POM) ester 3 of OA-6129 B2 (Fig. 1). Noritaka Chida and Yasuo Fukagawa The two hydroxyl groups in the pantoyl moiety of OA-6129B2 were protected by isopropylidena- Central Research Laboratories, tion for differentiation from the C-8 hydroxyl Sanraku Incorporated, 4-9-1 Johnan, Fujisawa 251, Japan group. The protected compound4 or 5 was allowed to (Received for publication May 25, 1989) react with 1.2 equiv of diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST)11} at -68°C in methylene chloride for 10 minutes. After the reaction mixture was diluted with Since the epoch-making discovery of thienamy- methylene chloride and washed with a saturated cin2), a numberof extensive studies have been carried aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution, silica gel out on the development of clinically useful car- column chromatography of the organic layer pro- bapenem compounds. As a result, formimidoyl- vided the desired fluorinated compound 6 or 7 thienamycin (imipenem) has recently been put on having a fluorine atom in the R configuration at C-8 the market as a combination drug (Primaxin)3) in 43 or 49% yield, respectively. -
New Β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Options for Treatment; Challenges for Testing
MEDICAL/SCIENTIFIC AffAIRS BULLETIN New β-lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Options for Treatment; Challenges for Testing Background The β-lactam class of antimicrobial agents has played a crucial role in the treatment of infectious diseases since the discovery of penicillin, but β–lactamases (enzymes produced by the bacteria that can hydrolyze the β-lactam core of the antibiotic) have provided an ever expanding threat to their successful use. Over a thousand β-lactamases have been described. They can be divided into classes based on their molecular structure (Classes A, B, C and D) or their function (e.g., penicillinase, oxacillinase, extended-spectrum activity, or carbapenemase activity).1 While the first approach to addressing the problem ofβ -lactamases was to develop β-lactamase stable β-lactam antibiotics, such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins, another strategy that has emerged is to combine existing β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors. Key β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that have been used widely for over a decade include amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, and pipercillin/tazobactam. The continued use of β-lactams has been threatened by the emergence and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and more recently by carbapenemases. The global spread of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) including Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, limits the use of all β-lactam agents, including extended-spectrum cephalosporins (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime) and the carbapenems (doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem). This has led to international concern and calls to action, including encouraging the development of new antimicrobial agents, enhancing infection prevention, and strengthening surveillance systems. -
Penicillin Allergy Guidance Document
Penicillin Allergy Guidance Document Key Points Background Careful evaluation of antibiotic allergy and prior tolerance history is essential to providing optimal treatment The true incidence of penicillin hypersensitivity amongst patients in the United States is less than 1% Alterations in antibiotic prescribing due to reported penicillin allergy has been shown to result in higher costs, increased risk of antibiotic resistance, and worse patient outcomes Cross-reactivity between truly penicillin allergic patients and later generation cephalosporins and/or carbapenems is rare Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy Obtain a detailed history of allergic reaction Classify the type and severity of the reaction paying particular attention to any IgE-mediated reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, hives, angioedema, etc.) (Table 1) Evaluate prior tolerance of beta-lactam antibiotics utilizing patient interview or the electronic medical record Recommendations for Challenging Penicillin Allergic Patients See Figure 1 Follow-Up Document tolerance or intolerance in the patient’s allergy history Consider referring to allergy clinic for skin testing Created July 2017 by Macey Wolfe, PharmD; John Schoen, PharmD, BCPS; Scott Bergman, PharmD, BCPS; Sara May, MD; and Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FACP Disclaimer: This resource is intended for non-commercial educational and quality improvement purposes. Outside entities may utilize for these purposes, but must acknowledge the source. The guidance is intended to assist practitioners in managing a clinical situation but is not mandatory. The interprofessional group of authors have made considerable efforts to ensure the information upon which they are based is accurate and up to date. Any treatments have some inherent risk. Recommendations are meant to improve quality of patient care yet should not replace clinical judgment. -
Stems for Nonproprietary Drug Names
USAN STEM LIST STEM DEFINITION EXAMPLES -abine (see -arabine, -citabine) -ac anti-inflammatory agents (acetic acid derivatives) bromfenac dexpemedolac -acetam (see -racetam) -adol or analgesics (mixed opiate receptor agonists/ tazadolene -adol- antagonists) spiradolene levonantradol -adox antibacterials (quinoline dioxide derivatives) carbadox -afenone antiarrhythmics (propafenone derivatives) alprafenone diprafenonex -afil PDE5 inhibitors tadalafil -aj- antiarrhythmics (ajmaline derivatives) lorajmine -aldrate antacid aluminum salts magaldrate -algron alpha1 - and alpha2 - adrenoreceptor agonists dabuzalgron -alol combined alpha and beta blockers labetalol medroxalol -amidis antimyloidotics tafamidis -amivir (see -vir) -ampa ionotropic non-NMDA glutamate receptors (AMPA and/or KA receptors) subgroup: -ampanel antagonists becampanel -ampator modulators forampator -anib angiogenesis inhibitors pegaptanib cediranib 1 subgroup: -siranib siRNA bevasiranib -andr- androgens nandrolone -anserin serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists altanserin tropanserin adatanserin -antel anthelmintics (undefined group) carbantel subgroup: -quantel 2-deoxoparaherquamide A derivatives derquantel -antrone antineoplastics; anthraquinone derivatives pixantrone -apsel P-selectin antagonists torapsel -arabine antineoplastics (arabinofuranosyl derivatives) fazarabine fludarabine aril-, -aril, -aril- antiviral (arildone derivatives) pleconaril arildone fosarilate -arit antirheumatics (lobenzarit type) lobenzarit clobuzarit -arol anticoagulants (dicumarol type) dicumarol -
Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Threat Level Urgent
CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER THREAT LEVEL URGENT 8,500 700 $281M Estimated cases Estimated Estimated attributable in hospitalized deaths in 2017 healthcare costs in 2017 patients in 2017 Acinetobacter bacteria can survive a long time on surfaces. Nearly all carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections happen in patients who recently received care in a healthcare facility. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW CASES OVER TIME ■ Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter cause pneumonia Continued infection control and appropriate antibiotic use and wound, bloodstream, and urinary tract infections. are important to maintain decreases in carbapenem-resistant These infections tend to occur in patients in intensive Acinetobacter infections. care units. ■ Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter can carry mobile genetic elements that are easily shared between bacteria. Some can make a carbapenemase enzyme, which makes carbapenem antibiotics ineffective and rapidly spreads resistance that destroys these important drugs. ■ Some Acinetobacter are resistant to nearly all antibiotics and few new drugs are in development. CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER A THREAT IN HEALTHCARE TREATMENT OVER TIME Acinetobacter is a challenging threat to hospitalized Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem- patients because it frequently contaminates healthcare resistant Acinetobacter baumannii are extremely limited. facility surfaces and shared medical equipment. If not There are few new drugs in development. addressed through infection control measures, including rigorous -
Profile Profile Profile Uses and Administration
Gramicidin/lmipenem 309 Graneodin N; Graneodin; Gripaben Caramelos; Kenacomb; t Incompatibility and stability. Intipenem is unstable at Nasomicina; Neo Coltirot; Pantometilt; Proetztotal; Tosedrin �-�P.�.�� ����---········································································· alkaline or acidic pH and the commercially available injec (details are given in Volume B) NF; Austral.: Kenacomb; Neosporint; Otocomb Otic; Otodex; ProprielaryPreparations tion of intipenem with cilastatin sodium for intravenous Sofradex; Soframycint; Austria: Volon A antibiotikahaltigt; V alpeda. use is buffered to provide, when reconstituted, a solution Belg. : Mycolog; Polyspectran Granticidinet; Braz.: Fonergin; Single-ingredient Preparations. UK: with pH 6.5 to 7.5. Licensed product information advises Londerm-Nt; Mud; Neolon D; Omcilon-A M; Oncibel; Oncileg; against mixing with other antibacterials. Onciplust; Canad.: Ak Spor; Antibiotic Cream; Antibiotic Plus; Complete Antibiotic Ointment; Diosporint; Neosporin; Opti lbafloxacin (BAN, USAN, r/NN) References. cort; Optimyxin Plus; Optimyxin; Polysporin Complete; Poly 1. Bigley FP, et al. Compatibility of imipenem-dlastatin sodium with Am Hosp Phann 1986; 43: 2803- sporin For Kids; Polysporin Plus Pain Relief; Polysporin Triple commonly used intravenous solutions. 9. J Antibiotic; Polysporin; Polytopic; ratio-Tria comb; Sofracort; 2. Smith GB, et al. Stability and kinetics of degradation of imipenem in Soframycin; Soframycin; Triple Antibiotic Ointment; Viaderm Pharm 1990; 79: 732-40. aqueous