DOCSLIB.ORG

Focus Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Focus Papers duke conference on the public domain focus paper discussion drafts (in order of conference presentation) 3 people 3 • james boyle • elinor ostrom & charlotte hess • pamela samuelson • mark hosler & don joyce • david lange & jennifer lange anderson • arti rai & rebecca eisenberg • larry lessig • yochai benkler 3 topics 3 the public domain and the commons: history & theory • mapping the digital public domain • the cultural public domain • fair use and appropriationist art • the public domain in biotech • innovation, the commons and digital networks • constitutional protection of the public domain online schedule at http://www.law.duke.edu/pd table of contents • introduction & paper excerpts ................ iv • james boyle the second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain .............. 1 I the second enclosure movement ....................... 1 II the construction of the public domain ................... 19 a.) anti-monopoly and a tax on reading ................. 19 b.) recognizing the public domain ...................... 25 c.) discovering the e-commons ....................... 31 d.) reifying the negative? ............................ 38 • elinor ostrom & charlotte hess artifacts, facilities, and content: information as a common-pool resource ....................... 44 I. introduction ............................................. 45 II. What is a commons? .................................... 47 III. Clarifying key concepts ................................. 52 The confusion between the nature of a good and a property regime ............................................ 53 The confusion between a resource system and the flow of resource units ................................ 55 The confusion between common-property and open-access regimes ............................................ 56 The confusion over what property rights are involved in “ownership” ............................................ 59 IV. Artifacts, facilities, and content of scholarly information .. 65 V. The evolution of scholarly information ...................... 70 VI. Conclusion ........................................... 79 • pamela samuelson digital information, digital networks, and the public domain ..................................... 80 I. Introduction ........................................ 80 II. Mapping the public domain as an aid to understanding its present state in the digital environment ....................... 81 -i- A map of the public domain and adjacent terrains ........ 84 III. Threats to the public domain in the digital environment .... 87 IV. Strategies for preserving and nurturing the public domain in the digital environment ................................. 102 V. Conclusion ....................................... 105 • negativland (hosler & joyce) two relationships to a cultural public domain .. 108 Introduction ....................................... 108 part one: free exchange in the digital domain ................. 109 Two positions ..................................... 109 Screams of indignation ............................. 112 The consumer as criminal .......................... 114 Art over profit? .................................... 115 Paradoxes of practicality ............................ 117 part two: sticky fingered history ............................ 118 Grist for the mill .................................... 118 Jumping music .................................... 120 In crept collage .................................... 121 How it began and what it became .................... 122 Pay to play ....................................... 124 A distinct lack of understanding ...................... 125 Defining art and business .......................... 126 Fair use for collage ................................ 128 Two relationships to a cultural public domain ........................................... 129 • david lange and jennifer lange anderson copyright, fair use and transformative critical appropriation ............................... 130 Introduction ............................................. 130 I. The first amendment ................................... 133 II. Appropriation ......................................... 137 III. The private domain .................................... 140 IV. Transformative critical appropriation .................... 143 -ii- • rebecca eisenberg & arti rai the public and the private in biopharmaceutical research ................................... 157 I. The Bayh-Dole act and the increasingly proprietary character of university-based biomedical research ................. 163 II. Patents in biopharmaceutical research: finding the right balance III. NIH's Role in preserving the public domain.............. 167 IV. Enhancing the legal authority of NIH ................... 173 Conclusion ............................................. 175 • larry lessig the architecture of innovation ................ 177 • yochai benkler through the looking glass: alice and the constitutional foundations of the public domain 192 The white rabbit ......................................... 192 Off with his head! ........................................ 192 What, exactly, is your problem? ............................ 193 I. General framework ................................. 193 II. Political theory of the constitutional limitations on exclusive rights in information ....................................... 198 A. Democracy ................................. 199 B. Autonomy .................................. 205 C. The court as an institutional counterbalance ...... 212 III. Pressure points—the state of play today...... ............... 215 A. That’s not what the law says at all ............... 215 B. neo-lochnerism and the moral inversion of the first amendment ........................................... 218 D. regulating the logical layer: code and the constitution .. 226 E. Criminalization .............................. 231 Conclusion ....................................... 236 -iii- introduction The last fifteen years has seen a rise in both the importance and the strength of intellectual property rights in the world economy; rights have expanded in areas ranging from the human genome to the internet and have been strengthened with legally backed digital fences, lengthened copyright terms and increased penalties. Is this expansion of intellectual property necessary to respond to new copying technologies, and desirable because it will produce investment and innovation? Must we privatize the public domain to avoid a “tragedy of the commons,” or can the technologies of cheap copying and global networks actually make common pool management more efficient than legal monopolies? Questions such as these have thrown attention on the “other side” of intellectual property: the public domain. What does the public domain do? What is its importance, its history, its role in science, art, and in the building of the internet? How is the public domain similar to and different from the idea of a commons? This conference, the first major meeting to focus squarely on the topic of the public domain, will try to answer some of these questions in areas ranging from the human genome to appropriationist art, from the production of scientific data to the architecture of our communications networks. The papers gathered in this collection are attempts to answer these questions. On our request, the authors, all of whom are leading thinkers in the field, have made them available as discussion drafts, lacking the polish, the reservations, the citations, the second and third thoughts that more time would have provided. In return, we ask that you be charitable in noticing typos and slips of the pen, or brain. Thanks to all the contributors for producing such excellent papers on such short notice. The Duke Conference on the Public Domain is made possible by a very generous grant from the Center for the Public Domain http://www.centerpd.org Thanks to the Center for their support and in particular to Laurie Racine, Jen Horney, & Tawnya Louder-Reynolds for all their hard work. We would also like to acknowledge the support of Duke Law School’s intellectual property program; thanks to Professors David Lange and Jerome Reichman for organizing panels, to Eileen Wojciechowski, the conference coordinator and to Patti Meyer and Kurt Meletzke for countless organizational efforts, to Daphne Keller and William J. Friedman, the Senior Fellows in Intellectual Property and the Public Domain & to Lauren Dame, Associate Director of the Duke Genome, Ethics, Law and Policy Center -iv- excerpts from the papers The framing papers for the conference are intended to start the discussion before the conference even begins. They are arranged in sections corresponding to the organization of the conference: 3 the history and theory of the public domain: 3 a ‘state of the public domain’ report: digital networks, cultural creation and basic science 3 subject area 1: the cultural public domain: fair use and appropriation 3 subject area 2: commodification of the public domain: the challenge for science and innovation 3 subject area 3: the architecture of networks: the public domain in bandwidth, software and content 3 the constitutionalization of the public domain 3 the history and theory of the public domain 3 james boyle, the second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain We are in the middle of a second enclosure movement; it sounds grandiloquent to call it "the enclosure of the intangible commons of the mind" but in a very real
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “The Future Is Open” for Composition Studies: a New
    THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES “THE FUTURE IS OPEN” FOR COMPOSITION STUDIES: A NEW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MODEL IN THE DIGITAL AGE By CHARLES LOWE A Dissertation submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Summer Semester, 2006 Copyright © 2006 Charles Lowe All Rights Reserved The members of the committee approve the dissertation of Charles Lowe defended on May 25, 2006. ______________________________ John Fenstermaker Professor Directing Dissertation ______________________________ Ernest Rehder Outside Committee Member ______________________________ Eric Walker Committee Member ______________________________ Deborah Coxwell-Teague Committee Member Approved: ______________________________ Hunt Hawkins, Chair, Department of English The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii This text is dedicated to Wendy Bishop, John Lovas, Candace Spigelman, and Richard Straub, four teachers and researchers in the field of composition studies with whom it was my pleasure to work. I only wish I could have the opportunity again. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 The Future Is Open.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Archive: an Interview with Brewster Kahle Brewster Kahle and Ana Parejo Vadillo
    The Internet Archive: An Interview with Brewster Kahle Brewster Kahle and Ana Parejo Vadillo Rumour has it that one of the candidates for Librarian of Congress is Brewster Kahle, the founder and director of the non-profit digital library Internet Archive.1 That he may be considered for the post is a testament to Kahle’s commitment to mass digitization, the cornerstone of modern librarianship. A visionary of the digital preservation of knowledge and an outspo- ken advocate of the open access movement (the memorial for the Internet activist Aaron Swartz was held at the Internet Archive’s headquarters in San Francisco), Kahle has been part of the many ventures that have created our cyber age. At MIT, he was on the project team of Thinking Machines, a precursor of the World Wide Web. In 1989 he created WAIS (Wide Area Information Server), the first electronic publishing system, which was designed to search and make information available. He left Thinking Machines to focus on his newly founded company, WAIS, Inc., which was sold to AOL two years later for a reported $15 million. In 1996 he co- founded Alexa Internet, which was built on the principles of collecting Web traffic data and analysis.2 The company was named after the Library of Alexandria, the largest repository of knowledge in the ancient world, to highlight the potential of the Internet to become such a custodian. It was sold for c. $250 million in stock to Amazon, which uses it for data mining. Alongside Alexa Internet, in 1996 Kahle founded the Internet Archive to archive Web culture (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The BRIDGE Linking Engin Ee Ring and Soci E T Y
    Spring 2010 THE ELECTRICITY GRID The BRIDGE LINKING ENGIN ee RING AND SOCI E TY The Impact of Renewable Resources on the Performance and Reliability of the Electricity Grid Vijay Vittal Securing the Electricity Grid S. Massoud Amin New Products and Services for the Electric Power Industry Clark W. Gellings Energy Independence: Can the U.S. Finally Get It Right? John F. Caskey Educating the Workforce for the Modern Electric Power System: University–Industry Collaboration B. Don Russell The Smart Grid: A Bridge between Emerging Technologies, Society, and the Environment Richard E. Schuler Promoting the technological welfare of the nation by marshalling the knowledge and insights of eminent members of the engineering profession. The BRIDGE NatiOnaL AcaDemY OF Engineering Irwin M. Jacobs, Chair Charles M. Vest, President Maxine L. Savitz, Vice President Thomas F. Budinger, Home Secretary George Bugliarello, Foreign Secretary C.D. (Dan) Mote Jr., Treasurer Editor in Chief (interim): George Bugliarello Managing Editor: Carol R. Arenberg Production Assistant: Penelope Gibbs The Bridge (ISSN 0737-6278) is published quarterly by the National Aca- demy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC. Vol. 40, No. 1, Spring 2010 Postmaster: Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and time- liness. They reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. © 2010 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Plunderphonics – Plagiarismus in Der Musik
    Plagiat und Fälschung in der Kunst 1 PLUNDERPHONICS – PLAGIARISMUS IN DER MUSIK PLUNDERPHONICS – PLAGIARISMUS IN DER MUSIK Durch die Erfindung der Notenschrift wurde Musik versprachlicht und damit deren Beschreibung mittelbar. Tonträger erlaubten es, Interpretationen, also Deutungen dieser sprachlichen Beschreibung festzuhalten und zu reproduzieren. Mit der zunehmenden Digitalisierung der Informationen und somit der Musik eröffneten sich im 20. Jahrhundert neue Möglichkeiten sowohl der Schaffung als auch des Konsums der Musik. Eine Ausprägung dieses neuen Schaffens bildet Plunderphonics, ein Genre das von der Reproduktion etablierter Musikstücke lebt. Diese Arbeit soll einen groben Überblick über das Genre, deren Ursprünge und Entwicklung sowie einigen Werken und thematisch angrenzenden Musik‐ und Kunstformen bieten. Es werden rechtliche Aspekte angeschnitten und der Versuch einer kulturphilosophischen Deutung unternommen. 1.) Plunderphonics und Soundcollage – Begriffe und Entstehung Der Begriff Plunderphonics wurde vom kanadischen Medienkünstler und Komponisten John Oswald geprägt und 1985 in einem bei der Wired Society Electro‐Acoustic Conference in Toronto vorgetragenen Essay zuerst verwendet [1]. Aus musikalischer Sicht stellt Plunderphonics hierbei eine aus Fragmenten von Werken anderer Künstler erstellte Soundcollage dar. Die Fragmente werden verfälscht, beispielsweise in veränderter Geschwindigkeit abgespielt und neu arrangiert. Hierbei entsteht ein Musikstück, deren Bausteine zwar Rückschlüsse auf das „Ursprungswerk“ erlauben, dessen Aussage aber dem „Original“ zuwiderläuft. Die Verwendung musikalischer Fragmente ist keine Errungenschaft Oswalds. Viele Musikstile bedienen sich der Wiederaufnahme bestehender Werke: Samples in populär‐ und elektronischer Musik, Riddims im Reggae, Mash‐Ups und Turntablism in der Hip‐Hop‐Kultur. Soundcollagen, also Musikstücke, die vermehrt Fragmente verwenden, waren mit dem Fortschritt in der Tontechnik möglich geworden und hielten Einzug in den Mainstream [HB2].
    [Show full text]
  • SLA Silicon Valley
    Home Discussion List About Us » Leadership » Events » Members » Career » Documents » Sponsorship » Site Map Archive | Chapter Events RSS feed for this section 2017 Holiday Party Posted on November 14, 2017. The holidays are quickly approaching, which means it’s time for our annual holiday party! This year, we are pulling out all the stops, so be sure to join us for an evening of fun and festivities. Ticket price includes dinner, dessert, and two drink tickets. When: 5:30-8pm, Tuesday, Dec 12 Where: Xanh, a modern Vietnamese restaurant located at 110 Castro St, in Mountain View. How: Pre-pay for admission here: Event has concluded We look forward to seeing you then! Posted in Chapter Events, EventsComments Off on 2017 Holiday Party SLA SF/SLA SV Joint Dinner Program Posted on August 24, 2017. The San Francisco Bay Region and the Silicon Valley Chapters jointly present a dinner program… Developing Your Cultural Intelligence In The Workplace: What It Is and Why It Matters Presented by Dr. Michele A. L. Villagran, President and CEO of CulturalCo, LLC. Our workplaces are becoming more diverse than ever with a range of cultures, including ethic, national, generational, and organizational. Do you want to learn how to develop and apply cultural intelligence at your organization? How can you improve your effectiveness when working with culturally diverse colleagues and clients? Dr. Villagran will share with us how we can use Cultural Intelligence to address these concerns. Tuesday, September 19, 2017 Fattoria e Mare 1095 Rollins Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Schedule: 5:30pm Check in/networking 6:00pm Dinner 6:45pm Introductions 7:00pm Speaker presentation 8:30pm Closing remarks Registration Cost: $30 SLA Member $40 Non- SLA Member $20 Student/Retired/Unemployed ————————————————— Please RSVP to Heather Heen ([email protected]) by September 15th, by sending her your name, email address, and company affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Computer Commission, 84 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 84 | Number 1 Article 3 12-1-2005 The edeF ral Computer Commission Kevin Werbach Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kevin Werbach, The Federal Computer Commission, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 1 (2005). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol84/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FEDERAL COMPUTER COMMISSION KEVIN WERBACH* The conventional wisdom that the computer industry thrives in the absence of government regulation is wrong. Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") rules touch every personal computer ever made. Over the last quarter-century, the FCC has steadily increasedits influence over personalcomputing devices and applications. Perhaps surprisingly, though, the "Federal Computer Commission" has largely been a positive force in the technology sector. Regulators are now poised to take several actions that could shape the future of the Internet and the computer industry. In this environment, exposing the Federal Computer Commission provides a foundation for reasoned policy approaches. The fate of a dynamic and important set of industries should not be decided under the influence of a myth. INTRODU CTION ....................................................................................... 2 I. FEAR AND LOATHING .............................................................. 8 II. FCC COMPUTER REGULATION: PAST AND PRESENT ............. 14 A. Computers Invade the Phone Network ............................ 16 1. The Battle Over Terminal Attachments .................... 16 2. The Computer Inquiries and Open Network A rchitecture ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Mondo 2000'S New Media Cool, 1989-1993
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The web as exception: The rise of new media publishing cultures Stevenson, M.P. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Stevenson, M. P. (2013). The web as exception: The rise of new media publishing cultures. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 2. Mondo 2000’s new media cool, 1989-1993 To understand how it was possible for the web to be articulated as an exceptional medium when it surfaced in the 1990s - that is, as a medium that would displace its mass and mainstream predecessors while producing web-native culture - one must see the historical and conceptual ties between web exceptionalism and cyberculture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation and Use of Open Educational Resources in Christian Higher Education
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2009-12-22 The Creation and Use of Open Educational Resources in Christian Higher Education John L. Hilton III [email protected] David Wiley [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the Educational Psychology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hilton, John L. III and Wiley, David, "The Creation and Use of Open Educational Resources in Christian Higher Education" (2009). Faculty Publications. 821. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/821 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. OER in Religious Education, 1 Running Head: OER in Religion Education “The Creation and Use of Open Educational Resources in Christian Higher Education” John Hilton III Instructional Psychology and Technology Brigham Young University David Wiley Instructional Psychology and Technology Brigham Young University Address correspondence to John Hilton III, Brigham Young University, Instructional Psychology and Technology, Provo, UT 84602. E-mail: [email protected] OER in Religious Education, 2 Abstract A significant movement in education concerns the use of open educational resources (OERs). By “open” it is generally meant that the resource is freely available to others to reuse in different contexts. These resources could include books, lesson plans, syllabi, slide shows, etc. There are several examples of individuals and institutions providing open educational resources; this openness is also specifically manifest in the field of religious education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind
    37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page i The Public Domain ___-1 ___0 ___ 1 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page ii Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson, August 13, 1813, p. 6. -1 ___ 0 ___ 1 ___ 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page iii James Boyle The Public Domain Enclosing the Commons of the Mind Yale University Press ___-1 New Haven & London ___0 ___ 1 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page iv A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. Copyright © 2008 by James Boyle. All rights reserved. The author has made an online version of this work available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License. It can be accessed through the author’s website at http://james-boyle.com. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 978-0-300-13740-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008932282 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). It contains 30 percent postconsumer waste (PCW) and is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) -1 ___ 0 ___ 1 ___ 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page v Contents Acknowledgments, vii Preface: Comprised of at Least Jelly?, xi 1 Why Intellectual Property?, 1 2 Thomas Jefferson Writes a Letter, 17 3 The Second Enclosure Movement, 42 4 The Internet Threat, 54 5 The Farmers’ Tale: An Allegory, 83 6 I Got a Mashup, 122 7 The Enclosure of Science and Technology: Two Case Studies, 160 8 A Creative Commons, 179 9 An Evidence-Free Zone, 205 10 An Environmentalism for Information, 230 ___-1 Notes and Further Readings, 249 ___0 Index, 297 ___ 1 v 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page vi -1 ___ 0 ___ 1 ___ 37278_u00.qxd 8/28/08 11:04 AM Page vii Acknowledgments The ideas for this book come from the theoretical and practical work I have been doing for the last ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE: Officer Election Information, & More
    Southern Chapter Winter 2007 Southern Chapter 28th Regional Conference March 1–3, 2007 University of Miami (Coral Gables, Florida) MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CONFERENCE HOST Dear Colleagues, many of you at the Southern Chapter 28th Regional Conference. As you peruse the conference program, I can’t believe that it has been you will see again that the Southern Chapter is fortunate almost a year since our last regional to have a lot of depth and diversity in creative and conference in San Juan, Puerto Rico research efforts, sure signs of health and energy and that we now look forward to in our region. And this year, our Keynote speaker the next one in Miami. My term as will be Kristine Burns, distinguished composer and Chapter President also ends after this year’s conference. Associate Dean of Academic Affairs for the College This position has given me a fast and furious two of Architecture and the Arts at Florida International years of rewards as well as lots of learning and labor. University. The biggest reward has been the opportunity to become better acquainted with many of you and Conference Details: your work through the planning and coordination of our chapter conferences. As a representative of our LOCATION: Southern Chapter at national conferences, I have also appreciated gaining more sensitivity to the breadth Frost School of Music and scope of what CMS stands for, and what it does University of Miami on the international as well as the national level. Coral Gables, FL For me, opportunities for interdisciplinary activity and interaction are the strongest offerings of the Gusman Concert Hall organization.
    [Show full text]
  • VARIATIONS #1 Devoted to Exploring the Complex Map of Sound Art from Different Points of View Organised in Curatorial Series
    Curatorial > VARIATIONS With this section, RWM continues a line of programmes VARIATIONS #1 devoted to exploring the complex map of sound art from different points of view organised in curatorial series. Transition 'Variation' is the formal term for a musical composition based The first episode of this overview of appropriative collage in music covers the on a previous musical work, and many of those traditional years 1909 through 1961, beginning with Charles Ives, who composed in a cut methods (changing the key, meter, rhythm, harmonies or and paste style with sheet music in a way that anticipated what later composers tempi of a piece) are used in much the same manner today would do with multi-track tapes and mixers. We skip through decades to arrive at by sampling musicians. But the practice of sampling is more 'Twisting The Dials', the Happiness Boys' 1928 tribute to late night radio surfing, than a simple modernization or expansion of the number of before moving to John Cage's proto-sampling pieces for radio and tape, 'Credo In options available to those who seek their inspiration in the US' and the 'Imaginary Landscapes'. We witness the million-selling cut-in records refinement of previous composition. The history of this music of Buchanan and Goodman and the resulting lawsuits, Richard Maxfield's tape cut-ups of a sermonizing preacher, and conclude with James Tenney's dedicated traces nearly as far back as the advent of recording, and its dissection of a single recording of Elvis: 'Collage No. 1', the first remix . emergence and development mirrors the increasingly self- conscious relationship of society to its experience of music.
    [Show full text]