DOCSLIB.ORG

^H Y2 ^B4cash Deficit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
^H Y2 ^B4cash Deficit TREASURY FINANCING REQUIREMENTS $Bil July - September 1980 $Bil. 50 Uses 471/4 Sources 50 bov t Acct Investment |K^9| ^jjg^lSpecial Issues-!/ 40 — Coupon .^^^H Maturities HHH 40 HHi Coupon V4 HMM HLIm" Refundings 30 — Nonmarketables ^^^H 30 ^H y2 ^^M Savings Bonds ^^M and Other 20 20 ^B4Cash Deficit • Net Market tBPfjM Borrowing tBjjjliS 10 H 10 E^H| Increase in I^H Cash Balance 0 0 ±1 Net of Vi billion maturities other than special issues. Officeof the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-19 TREASURY FINANCING REQUIREMENTS October - December 1980 $Bil. $Bil. Uses Sources 60 60 55V4 Redemptions of Special Issues • 4 Gov't Account Sales 50 50 40 — Coupon Maturities t 4 Coupon Refundings 40 y4 Savings Bonds —.and Other 30 30 y2 Foreign Nonmarketables 20 Net Market | 25V4 < 20 Borrowing I Cash Deficit 10 10 Decrease in Cash Balance v 0 0 ii Assumes $15 billion December 31, 1980 cash balance. Office of the Secretary of the Treasury October 28, 1980-20 Office of Government Financing TREASURY OPERATING CASH BALANCE Semi-Monthly Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 1979 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury October 28, 1980-12 Office of Government Financing TREASURY NET MARKET BORROWING^ Calendar Year Quarters $Bil. $Bil. COUPONS 28.2 111Over 10 yrs. 24.7 23.9 ^0-10 yrs. 22.8 BILLS 20 19.4 20 17.5 17.1 16.1 16.1 14.8 1 14.2 13.3 I 10.8 10.6 10 Li 10 ill! iillIIlimn 0 fl ill 0 I I —0.3 —0.1 -10 -3.9 -10 J_ _L J_ I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV I II III IVe 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 J/ Excludes Federal Reserve and Government Account Transactions. Off ice of the Secretary of the Treasury e estimate Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-6 TREASURY NET BORROWING FROM NONMARKETABLE ISSUES •10 --10 I II III IV II III IV I II III IV I IV I II III IV I II III IVe 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 e estimate Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-5 QUARTERLY CHANGES IN FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS OF PUBLIC DEBT SECURITIES I II III IV III IV III IV II III2/ 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 \] F.R.B. Purchases of marketable issues as agents for foreign and Office of the Secretary of the Treasury international monetary authorities for new cash. Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-4 2/ Partly estimated. CUMULATIVE NET CASH FLOW IN SAVINGS BONDS u UN. $Bil. 0 \^-^ 1978 0 -2 — -2 \ 1979 *\ -4 -4 — -6 t \ ~^- \ — -8 -8 ^^^^^^ 1980e : 10 -10 I I I I I I I I I I I I i M MJJ fi N Month of year -VCash sales less redemptions Office of the Secretary of the Treasury e October partly estimated. October 28, 1980-13 Office of Government Financing SHORT TERM INTEREST RATES Monthly Averages % % 20- 20 18- 18 16 14 12 10 # j Through 8 If October 24 -6 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-15 SHORT TERM INTEREST RATES Weekly Averages % 20 18 16 Week ending October 22, 1980 14 12 10 %"\V „.————•*••:—*•' 8 8 •"*•.. / Commercial Paper 6- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-14 LONG MARKET RATES Monthly Averages 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-17 INTERMEDIATE AND LONG MARKET RATES Weekly Averages May June 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury October 28,1980-16 Office of Government Financing MARKET YIELDS ON GOVERNMENTS Bid Yields % % "/or- j—_l_j_—i—r —|70•&> 17 v~\ IS -113 — 17 r •i i r I I 12 12 16 16 March 24, 1980 11 11 10 15 w * 10K................... ~10 — 15 ^^^ 91—i—I i I I I i I i I i I I I I Q ^^^^ 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 14 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 4 5 6 Years to Maturity Office of the Secretary of the Treasury October 28, 1980-9 Office of Government Financing NEW MONEY FROM NONCOMPETITIVE BIDS IN TREASURY BILL AUCTIONS AND AVERAGE AUCTION YIELDS $Mil —600 Apr. May Jun. 1980 Auction Dates ^ Discount basis. Office of the Secretary of the Treasury * New money is the difference between noncompetitive bids on the Office of Government Financing new issues and maturing bills previously bid noncompetitively. October 28, 1980-2 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF ALLOTMENTS IN TREASURY BOND AUCTIONS 100% -100% — % 80 I 1 i i 80 • i 60 60 40 40 20 20 i 0 0 Rate(%) 9 8% 9 9y8 8% 91/a 10y8 103/8 101/2 11% 12% 10 10% 10% Length(yrs) 1 5 30 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 30 1979_ 1980 HI Dealers Insurance Cos.! Pension Fds. Ill Other Com'I Banks V/ACorporations 111! Individuals Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-21 PRIVATE HOLDINGS OF TREASURY MARKETABLE DEBT BY MATURITY $Bil. September 30, 19801 463.7 450 t 48.6 _i_ COUPONS 400- 17.3 Over 10 years 7-10 years 350 E^ 2-7 years 98.0 32 years & under 300 BILLS 250 144.1 200 150 100 155.7 50 0 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 As of December 31 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury October 28, 1980-3 Office of Government Financing AVERAGE LENGTH OF THE MARKETABLE DEBT Privately Held Years 5 September 1980 3 Years 9 Months \ — January 1976 3- "** \ a. 2Years •V/y^iy 45 Months^ %ij 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 Office of the Secretary of Hit Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28. 1980-1 TRADING VOLUME AND OPEN INTEREST IN 90 DAY TREASURY BILL FUTURES CONTRACTS17 $Bil. $Bil. OPEN INTEREST 900- 900 800 800 700 700 600 TRADING VOLUME 600 500 500 400 400 I II III IV I II III IV II III IV I II III IV I II III 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 300 300 200 H200 100 100 EgS? nnn I II III IV II III IV II III IV I II III IV I II III 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 ^ Contracts traded on the International Monetary Market (IMM). Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28,1980-8 DELIVERABLE BILLS AND DELIVERIES ON 90 DAY TREASURY BILL FUTURES CONTRACTS^ $Bil. $Bil. 6 mo. 3 3 3 mo. 0 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep 0 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 J/Contracts traded on the International Monetary Market(IMM). Office of the Secretary of the Treasury i/Consists of the amount of accepted competitive tenders for the new Office of Government Financing 3 month bill and the 6 month bill issued 3 months earlier. October 28.19807 OWNERSHIP OF MATURING COUPON ISSUES October 1980 - March 1981^ (In Millions of Dollars) Savings Institutions State & Other Total Commercial Local Corpora Private Maturing Issues Privately Long- Intermediate- Foreign Banks General tions Domestic Held term 11 term ?/ Investors Investors Funds Holders 3 1/2% Bd. 11/15/80 1128 47 67 94 78 34 808 7 1/8% Nt. 11/15/80 3790 791 18 229 137 198 1665 752 9 1 /4% Nt. 11 /30/80 2830 405 9 111 62 65 1549 629 5 7/8% Nt. 12/31/80 2654 456 14 279 141 354 1096 314 9 7/8% Nt. 12/31/80 2989 406 3 109 67 28 1647 729 9 3/4% Nt. 1 /31 /81 2647 413 3 74 87 109 1474 487 7% Nt. 2/15/81 1258 382 19 161 20 65 604 7 7 3/8% Nt. 2/15/81 3671 950 23 417 121 151 1668 341 9 3/4% Nt. 2/28/81 2461 635 9 124 63 21 1213 396 6 7/8% Nt. 3/31/81 2562 445 9 175 126 181 936 690 9 5/8% Nt. 3/31 /81 2783 476 10 75 55 52 1193 922 TOTAL 28,773 5406 184 1848 957 1258 13,853 5267 U Amounts for investor classes are based on the August 1980 Treasury Ownership Survey. 2/ Includes State and local pension funds and life insurance companies. 31 Includes casualty and liability insurance companies, mutual savings banks, savings and loan associations, and corporate pension trust funds. Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-18 TREASURY MARKETABLE MATURITIES Privately Held, Excluding Bills and Exchange Notes $Bil. $Bil. 1985 6 4 1980 6.0 6 5.6 6 49 E3 4 J2.8 1 2.8 3.1 2 2 - 0 ol— 1986 6 8 7.5 4 6 4.1 2 4 - 0 2 e!o 6-470 I .3 6 0 4.0^4.0 4.6 1987 4 4.0K33.9 4 2.7 2.0 1.8 2 2 I VA 0 0 2 4 1988 2.3 5.8 1983 6£ 6 5.2 2 - g I 4 0 2.9 1 Jz 2.4 2.5 1989 3.8 2 i.ofc 4 2.2 0 1 2 4.5 1984 I 4 3.2 3^ 3.0 0 2.3 ?.5 1990 2.6 2 2- 1.4 • 0 I 0 JFMAMJJASOND JFMAMJ JASOND HSecurities issued prior to 1978 ]New issues calendar year 1979 New issues calendar year 1978 |Issued orannounced through October 24, 1980 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Office of Government Financing October 28, 1980-10 TREASURY MARKETABLE MATURITIES Privately Held, Excluding Bills and Exchange Notes $Bil.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Report for Belgium
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PETITIONS Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families Country report for Belgium STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE and PETI Committees, analyses the current status of transposition of selected provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC in Germany and identifies the main persisting barriers to free movement for EU citizens and their family members in German national law and practice. The study also examines discriminatory restrictions to free movement, measures to counter abuse of rights and refusals of entry and residence rights, in addition to expulsions. PE 556 969 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and Committee on Petitions and was commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter, please write to: [email protected] Research Administrators Responsible Ottavio MARZOCCHI and Darren NEVILLE Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] AUTHORS Nathalie MEURENS, Legal Advisor, Milieu Ltd Jozefien VAN CAENEGHEM, Legal Expert, Vrije Universiteit Brussels Under the guidance of Milieu Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Working Group J. Postel Request for Comments: 770 ISI September 1980
    Network Working Group J. Postel Request for Comments: 770 ISI September 1980 Obsoletes RFCs: 762, 758, 755, 750, 739, 604, 503, 433, 349 Obsoletes IENs: 127, 117, 93 ASSIGNED NUMBERS This Network Working Group Request for Comments documents the currently assigned values from several series of numbers used in network protocol implementations. This RFC will be updated periodically, and in any case current information can be obtained from Jon Postel. The assignment of numbers is also handled by Jon. If you are developing a protocol or application that will require the use of a link, socket, etc. please contact Jon to receive a number assignment. Jon Postel USC - Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, California 90291 phone: (213) 822-1511 ARPANET mail: POSTEL@ISIF Most of the protocols mentioned here are documented in the RFC series of notes. The more prominent and more generally used are documented in the Protocol Handbook [1] prepared by the Network Information Center (NIC). In the lists that follow a bracketed number, e.g. [1], off to the right of the page indicates a reference for the listed protocol. Postel [Page 1] RFC 770 September 1980 Assigned Numbers Network Numbers ASSIGNED NETWORK NUMBERS This list of network numbers is used in the internet, the field is 8 bits in size. Assigned Network Numbers Decimal Octal Name Network References ------- ----- ---- ------- ---------- 0 0 Reserved 1 1 BBN-PR BBN Packet Radio Network 2 2 SF-PR-1 SF Bay Area Packet Radio Network (1) 3 3 BBN-RCC BBN RCC Network 4 4 SATNET Atlantic Satellite Network 5 5 SILL-PR Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY VOLUME 18 0 NUMBER 3 * SEPTEMBER 1980 EDITORIAL BOARD LEON H. SCHMIDT, Editor-in-Chief (1985) ROBERT L. HAMILL, Editor (1985) University ofAlabama in Birmingham, Eli Lilly & Company, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama Indianapolis, Indiana HERBERT L. ENNIS, Editor (1982) EDWARD W. HOOK, Editor (1981) Roche Institute ofMolecular Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Nutley, New Jersey GEORGE A. JACOBY, JR., Editor (1985) JOEL G. FLAKS, Editor (1981) Massachusetts General Hospital University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia Boston, Massachusetts Vincent T. Andriole (1981) Milton Huppert (1980) Ian M. Rolo (1982) John P. Anhalt (1981) George Gee Jackson (1980) Richard Root (1980) Donald Armstrong (1980) George A. Jacoby, Jr. (1982) Jon E. Rosenblatt (1982) Robert Austrian (1980) Thomas Jones (1980) Milton R. J. Salton (1981) Arthur L. Barry (1980) William J. Jusko (1980) Merle Sande (1982) John E. Bennett (1981) Donald Kaye (1982) Jay Sanford (1980) Lawrence E. Bryan (1982) Jerome 0. Klein (1982) Arthur K. Saz (1982) Robert E. Brummitt (1982) Vernon Knight (1980) F. C. Sciavolino (1982) D. Buyske (1980) George S. Kobayashi (1982) Oldrich K. Sebek (1980) Yves Chabbert (1980) Jordan Konisky (1980) William M. Shannon (1980) Royston C. Clowes (1980) Matthew E. Levison (1981) Jerome J. Schentag (1982) C. Glenn Cobbs (1980) Friedrich C. Luft (1981) John C. Sherris (1980) Paul S. Cohen (1980) Joan Lusk (1980) Charles Shipman, Jr. (1982) Naomi Datta (1981) R. Luthy (1980) Robert W. Sidwell (1981) Julian Davies (1980) Gerald L. Mandell (1980) Walter Siegenthaler (1980) Lawrence E. Day (1980) Gerald Medoff (1980) Sigmund S. Socransky (1980) R. Gordon Douglas, Jr. (1980) Barbara Minshew (1982) P.
    [Show full text]
  • SSI: Trends and Changes, 1974–80
    SSI: Trends and Changes, 1974-80 byLennaKennedy* By the end of 1980, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program was making monthly cash assistance payments, aver- aging $170, to almost 4.2 million aged, blind, and disabled per- sons. When SSI payments began in January 1974, the number of recipients was 3.2 million and the average payment was $117. Since 1975, both SSI payments and Social Security bene- fits have been automatically adjusted each year to correspond with increases in the Consumer Price Index. A number of other trends in addition to growth can be discerned in the size of the population served, as well as in their categorical, geographic, and age distributions. This article discusses some of these trends and changes, using program data for the end of each cal- endar year through 1980. It also presents a brief summary of the program at the end of that period. The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program differed from State to State. In addition, payments provides cash assistance to residents of the 50 States, the within a State varied depending on criteria such as District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands special living arrangements-for instance, a recipient who are categorically eligible-aged 65 and older, blind, sharing an apartment or living in a domiciliary care fa- or disabled-and whose income and resources are with- cility. A few States also made higher supplementary in the limitations imposed by law and regulations. The payments to persons residing in metropolitan areas. maximum Federal SSI payment, originally $140 * per Although SSI has been affected by a number of legis- month for an individual without countable income and lative changes, the program has experienced little net ex- $210 for a couple, had risen by mid-1980 to $238 for an pansion since its beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, September 1980
    When you’re going overseas, you have enough to worry about without worrying about your insurance,too. Moving overseas can be a very traumatic time if you Moving overseas is simplified by the AFSA-sponsored don’t have the proper insurance. The fact is, the government insurance program for AFSA members. Our insurance will be responsible for only $15,000 worth of your belongings. program will take care of most of your worries. If any of your personal valuables such as cameras, jewelry, With our program, you can purchase as much property furs and fine arts are destroyed, damaged or stolen, you insurance as you feel you need at only 75tf per $100, and it would receive not the replacement cost of the goods, but only covers you for the replacement cost of household furniture a portion of what you’d have to pay to replace them. and personal effects that are destroyed, damaged or stolen, Claims processes are another headache you shouldn’t with no depreciation. You can also insure your valuable have to worry about. The government claims process is articles on an agreed amount basis, without any limitation. usually lengthy and requires investigation and AFSA coverage is worldwide, whether on business or documentation. pleasure. Should you have a problem, we provide simple, If you limit yourself to the protection provided under the fast, efficient claims service that begins with a simple phone Claims Act, you will not have worldwide comprehensive call or letter, and ends with payment in either U.S. dollars personal liability insurance, complete theft coverage or or local currency.
    [Show full text]
  • TO the GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING MEMBERSHIP in the UNITED NATIONS L~R(Jduflory NOTE
    Chapter VII PRACTICE RELATIVE TO RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING MEMBERSHIP IN THE UNITED NATIONS l~R(JDUflORY NOTE .............................................................. 109 PART 1. TABLE OF APPLICATIONS AND OF ACTIONS TAKEN THEREON BY THE SECU- RITY COUNCIL AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 1975-1980 Note .............................................................................. 109 A. Applications recommended by the Security Council ................................ 109 B. Applications that failed to obtain a recommendation ............................... 109 C. Discussion of the question in the Security Council, 197s.1980 ...................... 109 D. Applications pendin on I January 1975 ........................................... II0 E. Applications submitted between I January 1975 and 31 December 1980 .............. I IO F. Votes in the Security Council on draft resolutions and amendments concerning applicattons for admission to membership in the United Nations. 1975-1980 ....................... II0 G. Votes in the General Assembly on draft resolutions concerning Security Council recommen- dations for admission to membership in the United Nations, 1975-1980 ................ III PART II. CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OR AMENDMENT OF RULES J8d0OF THE PROVISIONAL RULES OF PROCEDURE Note ............................................................................... II2 PART Ill. PRESENTATION OF APPLICATIONS Note.. ............................................................................. II2 PART IV. REFERENCE
    [Show full text]
  • September 1980 Record
    THE FEDERAL ELECTION • COMMISSION 1325 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463 Volume 6, Number 9 September 1980 sian. The Manual provides information on uniform methods of bookkeeping and reporting to assist Congres­ sional candidates and their authorized committees in J keeping records and preparing reports required under the Act. Additional copies of these publications are available free of NEW PUBLICATIONS FOR charge through the FEC's Office of Public Communica­ CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES tions, 1325 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463; or by AND PARTY ORGANIZATIONS calling 202/523-4068 or toll-free 800/424-9530. During August 1980, the Commission distributed three new publications designed to assist Congressional candidate committees and party organizations in complying with the Act. All three publications reflect the 1979 Amendments to the Act. 1. A Record Supplement for State and Local Party Organi­ zations was sent to all registered party committees. It provides general information on sections of the Act which directly affect party political committees and • other party organizations. The Supplement covers such activities by state and local parties as: coordinated party expenditures (expenditures covered by 2 U.S.C. §441a (dl): activities that benefit candidates for federal office but which are exempt from the definition of "contribu­ FEC APPOINTS tion" and "expenditure"; volunteer activity; and record­ NEW STAFF DIRECTOR keeping and reporting requirements. The Supplement is On August 21, 1980, the Commission unanimously not, however, comprehensive. named B. Allen Clutter, III, as FEC Staff Director. Mr. 2. A revised edition of the Campaign Guide for Congres­ Clutter, who is currently serving as Executive Director of sional Candidates and Committees was distributed to the Minnesota Ethical Practices Board, will assume the the authorized campaign committees of all Congressional position in mid-September.
    [Show full text]
  • 128 a Resolution Authorizing the Negotiation And
    RESOLUTION NO. 80- 128 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION AND EXECUTION OF A SECOND AMENDATORY AGREEMENT WITH TURNER, COLLIE &BRADEN, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE RENOVATION OF THE POLK STREET BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY. WHEREAS, the MTA entered into an Agreement dated February 7, 1979 with Turner, Collie &Braden, Inc. for professional engineering and design services in connection with the design and construction of the renovation of the Polk Street Maintenance Facility; and WHEREAS, additional A &E services are required to revise drawings and specifications; and WHEREAS, as a result of the design changes, it is estimated that there will be a net reduction in construction costs of $723,400. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY THAT: Section 1: The Executive Director be authorized to negotiate and execute and the Assistant Secretary to attest to a Second Amendatory Agreement with Turner, Collie &Braden, Inc., for additional A &E services in connection with the renovation construction of the Polk Street Maintenance Facility. Section 2: Maximum amount payable for Additional Services shall be increased by $222,500.00, including a contingency limit of $231,500. Section 3: This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage. RESOLUTION NO. 80- 128 (Page 2) PASSED this 24th day of September, 1980. APPROVED this 24t ay of September, 1980. Daniel C. ATTEST: f:]~~;~ ~)~'Secf~ APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE: .- . ./ J~ . '»U.($:;/~ Wa1ter AddiEon, Executive Director FORM: .. --1) ___~~71 RESOLUTION NO, 80 1_29 _ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATION AND EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR ADDITIONAL CARSHARE PROGRAM FUNDING PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL RIDESHARING DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979'
    H-Diplo Shannon on Collier, 'Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979' Review published on Sunday, October 1, 2017 David R. Collier. Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2017. 448 pp. $75.00 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8156-3497-3. Reviewed by Matthew Shannon (Emory & Henry College) Published on H-Diplo (October, 2017) Commissioned by Seth Offenbach David Collier has offered an innovate reading of US-Iran relations from 1941 to 1979. He begins by reminding readers that scholars too often “neglect” the “all-encompassing approach” to studying the binational relationship during the reign of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (p. 5). Indeed, I have suggested that this is a significant historiographic intervention, as diplomatic histories on the period are divided between two genres.[1] The first is that of the sweeping narrative similar to the works of Barry Rubin, James Bill, and Richard Cottam in the 1980s.[2] The second genre, Collier notes, consists of “snapshots” of events such as the 1953 coup (p. 5). As the US government has declassified more documents, the literature has moved beyond the reporting of Rubin and the history-memoirs of Bill and Cottam to archive-based research on moments ranging from John F. Kennedy’s presidency to Jimmy Carter’s handling of the Iranian Revolution. Today, historians are in a position to revisit the entirety of the US relationship with the last shah, and that is what Collier does through “the framework of linkage and leverage” (p. 3). He borrows the concept from political scientists Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way’s 2010 book Competitive Authoritarianism to explain how US leverage over the shah’s behavior waxed and waned during his rule, and how connections between the two societies did or did not facilitate democracy promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 December 1980, the 4
    (c) To request the Secretary-General to submit at Noting the letter dated 15 December 1980 from the the end of this period a report on the developments in Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the the situation and the measures taken to implement Secretary-General, ss resolution 338 (1973). Convinced that the present situation has serious Adopted at the 2256th meeting 2 consequences for peace and security in the Middle by /4 votes to none.' East, Reaffirming its call for the strict respect for the territorial integrity, unity, sovereignty and political in­ dependence of Lebanon within its internationally rec­ Decisions ognized boundaries, At the same meeting, following the adoption of res­ I. Takes note of the report of the Secretary­ olution 481 (1980), the President made the following General on the United Nations Interim Force in Leba­ statement on behalf of the members of the Council: non; "In connexion with the adoption of the resolution 2. Decides to renew the mandate of the Force for a on the renewal of the mandate of the United Nations period of six months, that is, until 19 June 1981, and Disengagement Observer Force, I have been au­ reiterates its commitment to the full implementation of thorized to make the following complementary the mandate of the Force throughout its entire area of statement on behalf of the Security Council regard­ operation up to the internationally recognized bound­ ing the resolution just adopted: aries, according to the terms of reference and .. · As is known, the report of the Secretary­ guidelines as stated and confirmed in the appropriate General on the United Nations Disengagement Ob­ Security Council resolutions; server Force51 states, in paragraph 27, that, "De­ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-91-166 El Salvador: Military Assistance Has Helped Counter But
    ll~liftvl St.at,ths (;thnt*ral At~t~ollrll,irrb~~fi~e ___ “.-- -.__II..,“-1- __..I ._ ..” _^“_l_ __“”..__ _,. ._. .._... ,”.. *“, 11- -_-_._.... __-. --.-----l_-..-.--- -_--_---- Report, t,o the I-IorWY~able GAO Kd ward M. Kcmr~ody, IJ .S. Stmde .l__l-l” _-_1 “--m-“1.. April I!)91 EL SALVADOR Military Assistance Has Helped Counter but Not Overcome the Insurgency -.-“_(- _.~ ._-. _.- _-.l___l_^-__l_-__ - -... -“----p--m- -.-.-- --- National Security and International Affairs Division B-242216 April 23,199l The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy United States Senate Dear Senator Kennedy: In responseto your request, this report describeswhat impact U.S. military assistanceto El Salvador has had on that country’s ability to counter insurgent forces, how the assistance has changed that country’s military capabilities, and how the assistancehas attempted to instill and support respect for democracy and human rights. Unless you release its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days from its issue date. At that time, we will send copies of the report to appropriate congressional committees and the Secretariesof Defenseand State. Major contributors to this report are listed in appendix I. If you have any questions, please call me on (202) 2754128. Sincerely yours, Joseph E. Kelley Director, Security and International Relations Issues l3xecutive Swnmary Since 1980, the United States has provided over $1 billion in military aid Purpose to El Salvador to assist the government in its fight against an insur- gency. Senator Edward M. Kennedy requested that GAO review the U.S.
    [Show full text]