The Appointive and Removal Power of the Governor of Illinois
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Illinois Rejects a New Constitution Walter F
University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1923 Illinois Rejects a New Constitution Walter F. Dodd Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Dodd, Walter F., "Illinois Rejects a New Constitution" (1923). Minnesota Law Review. 2481. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2481 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW Journal of the State Bar Association VOL. VII FEBRUARY, 1923 No. 3 ILLINOIS REJECTS A NEW CONSTITUTION By WALTER F. DODD* T HE constitutional convention which assembled in Illinois on January 6, 1920, held a number of sessions running until Sep- tember 12, 1922. On September 12 a proposed constitution was finally agreed upon for submission to the people on December 12, 1922. The chief reasons for calling a constitutional conven- tion were (a) to modernize the tax system of the state; (b) to obtain a better and more simplified judicial organization; (c) to produce a short ballot, so that the voter would be able better to perform his duties; and (d) to provide an easier method for future amendments to the constitution, so that changes in the fundamental law of the state could be made when desired by the deliberate sentiment of the people. The issue of Cook County representation became a serious one immediately upon the meeting of the convention; and this issue was largely responsible for numerous sessions and recesses. -
The Settlement of Illinois, 1778{Protect
The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830 by Arthur Clinton Boggess This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830 Author: Arthur Clinton Boggess Release Date: October 9, 2010 [Ebook 34049] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SETTLEMENT OF ILLINOIS, 1778-1830*** Chicago Historical Society's Collection.—Vol. V. The Settlement of Illinois 1778-1830 by Arthur Clinton Boggess, Ph.D. Professor of History and political Science in Pacific University; a Director of the Oregon Historical Society; sometime Harrison Scholar in American History in the University of Pennsylvania; sometime Fellow in American History in the University of Wisconsin. Chicago Published by the society 1908 Contents Preface. .2 Chapter I. The County of Illinois. .4 Chapter II. The Period of Anarchy in Illinois. 33 Chapter III. 62 I. The Land and Indian Questions. 1790 to 1809. 62 II. Government Succeeding the Period of Anarchy, 1790 to 1809. 73 III. Obstacles to Immigration. 1790 to 1809. 81 Chapter IV. Illinois During Its Territorial Period. 1809 to 1818. 89 I. The Land and Indian Questions. 89 II. Territorial Government of Illinois. 1809 to 1818. 100 IV. Transportation and Settlement, 1809 to 1818. 107 IV. Life of the Settlers. 117 Chapter V. The First Years of Statehood, 1818 to 1830. -
Introduction
Introduction SAMUEL W. WITWER* It is hard to believe that almost twenty years have passed since the people of Illinois, pursuant to the old 1870 Illinois Constitution, voted in 1968 to call the Sixth Illinois Constitutional Convention which drafted our present Constitution. For most, if not all of the surviving delegates, numbering about 90 out of the original 116, the convention was an unforgettable experience, a highlight of our lives full of exciting and often dramatic events that we still recall as if they happened only yesterday. We have all watched with interest the application and interpretation of our common brain-child, the 1970 Illinois Constitution, over the intervening years. One of the new provisions of the 1970 Constitution is the "automatic 20-year question" provided in Article XIV, Section l(b), which for the first time in Illinois history, allows the people of our state to decide every twenty years whether or not to call a convention. This means that the General Assembly no longer has the sole discretion with respect to launching constitutional conventions. The Secretary of State, acting in a purely ministerial capacity, is required to place the question of calling a convention on the November general election ballot every twenty years unless within such period the General Assembly has done so. Inasmuch as the General Assembly has not done so since 1968, the automatic question provision of Section 1(b) has been triggered. One of the reasons for the automatic provision was the fact that the 1870 Constitution had become virtually unamendable. It was the hope of the delegates to the 1969-70 convention that at reasonable intervals the people of our state would review their basic law and determine whether there were provisions needful of amendment and, if so, whether revisions should occur by separate amendments legis- latively submitted or, instead, by the holding of an unlimited conven- tion to deal with the Constitution in its entirety. -
Constitution Study Guide Study Constitution
of the and the United States States United State of Illinois State Published by the Illinois Community College Board College the Illinois Community by Published Constitution Study Guide Study Constitution Illinois Community College Board 401 East Capitol Avenue Springfield, Illinois 62701-1711 The Illinois Community College Board ensures equal employment/educational opportunities/affirmative action regardless of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, or handicap. Produced by Curriculum Publications Clearinghouse • Western Illinois University • Horrabin Hall 71B • Macomb, IL 61455 • (800) 322-3905 TABLE OF CONTENTs Part One: The Declaration of Independence................................................... 1 . Declaring.Independence............................................................................ 1 . Excerpts.from.the.Declaration.of.Independence.................................... 2 Part Two: The U.S. Constitution......................................................................... 5 . U.S..Constitution.Outline........................................................................... 5 . Writing.the.Constitution:.Introduction.................................................... 6 . Writing.the.Constitution:.The.Federal.System.and.. Separation.of.Powers............................................................................ 12 . Article.I:.The.Legislative.Branch............................................................. 17 . How.a.Bill.Becomes.a.Law..................................................................... -
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY of the ILLINOIS INCOME TAX LAW of 1932 the Recent Case of Bachrachv
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW prive him of his constitutional immunity from the use of this evidence against him; the balance of policy lies on his side rather than in favor of the rule of practice. The language of the court is not very strong; moreover, the circumstances presented a strong case for the application of the rule which requires a motion before trial. Far from being undisputed or admitted, the illegality of the search and seizure in the case is debatable, depending on whether the court feels that probable cause existed for the arrest and search. To decide this fairly would re- quire delay in the trial to permit each side to marshal its facts and arguments. If the motion before trial rule is to be retained at all, these Ohio cases would seem to call for its application. It is to be noted, that even if the result of these cases were accepted as proper practice, it would not affect the great bulk of cases in which the problem of il- legal searches and seizures arises; the instant cases arose in police court, whereas the chief source of questions of this nature is felony cases which are tried in the felony and circuit courts. The confusion and haste of the police court does not exist there and a defendant can find no such excuse, as the Ohio court found for him, to excuse his failure to file a timely motion to suppress such evidence. Finally, we might regard the cases as other illustrations of a general distaste for the motion-before-trial rule. -
The First Two Decades*
The 1970 Illinois Constitution: The First Two Decades* A Selected Bibliography Compiled by ANN LOUSIN, Professor of Law, The John Marshall Law School Spring 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Prefatory Note ............................................................. 846 Sixth Illinois Constitutional Convention ............................. 847 Preamble & Article I-Bill of Rights ................................. 852 Article II-The Powers of the State .................................. 859 Article III-Suffrage and Elections ................................... 860 Article IV-The Legislature ............................................. 862 Article V-The Executive ................................................ 867 Article VI-The Judiciary ............................................... 870 Article VII-Local Government ....................................... 876 Article VII-Finance ..................................................... 889 Article IX-Revenue ...................................................... 891 Article X-Education ..................................................... 896 Article XI-Environment ................................................ 898 Article XII-The Militia ................................................. 898 Article XIII-General Provisions ...................................... 898 Article XIV-Constitutional Revisions ............................... 901 M iscellaneous ............................................................... 903 Transition Schedule ...................................................... -
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY of the ILLINOIS INCOME TAX LAW of 1932 the Recent Case of Bachrachv
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW RE-VIE:W VOLUMEi MAY 1933 NUMBER i THE BOARD OF EDITORS THE BOARD OF CONTROL VILLIAM ALLEN QUINLAN, Editor-in-Chief STANLEY A. KAPLAN ) Legislation and Administration Editors BENJAMIN M. BRODSKYa GEORGE EDWARD MCMURAY, JR., Comment Editor CHARLES WILBUR BoAND Notes and Recent Cases Editors JAMES WILLIAM MOORE BERNARD D. CAHN, Book Revie'w Editor ROBERT LEE SHAPmo, Business Editor ASSOCIATE EDITORS EUGENE L. CoN W. ROBERT MING, JR. Jom N. FEGAN A. A. RiBICoFF JOHN N. HUGHES ADOLPH ALLEN RUBINSON CHARLES GRAYDON MEGAN LEO SEGALL HUBERT CLEASBY MERRICK EARL FLOYD SIMMONS FRED MARSHALL MERRIFIELD JOSEPH JULIUS TICKTIN E. V. PUTTKAMMtER, Faculty Editor The Board of Editors does not assume collective responsibility for any statement in the columns of the Review. NOTES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW The issue of this, the first number of the University of Chicago Law Review, marks another step in the growth of the school. The Review will have a double purpose harmonious with the character and aims of the school itself. The Law School has in general two points of view: that of a school of national scope with interests as broad as the whole field of the law, and that of a school situated in the city of Chicago and consequently having a very direct and vital interest in the legal problems of the city and state in which it is. Both these points of view and these interests will be manifest in the various departments of the Review. NOTES III The main divisions of the magazine will constitute a carefully considered adaptation of the arrangements generally prevailing in law reviews. -
Sir Galahad & the Pols
Core Idea: CARE Reform government. “Sir Galahad & the Pols” January 28, 1952 Time magazine cover story about Adlai Stevenson II, January 28, 1952 issue Excerpt: If Lincoln Steffens* was right, corruption is the norm of U.S. political life; in spite of reform, the pols always come back; the Sir Galahads, sooner or later, get licked, or get laughed out of court, or join the gang. But men like Adlai Stevenson have dedicated themselves to a more hopeful and more dynamic proposition: that the U.S. is not a static pattern but a still-continuing experiment—an experiment, among other things, in good government. *Steffens was an early twentieth-century muckraking journalist. Background: Although this Time magazine cover story ran six months prior to the Democratic National Convention, it was a clear indication that party leaders, including President Harry S. Truman, were increasingly interested in Stevenson and his political future. One week before this article appeared on newsstands, Truman invited Stevenson to the White House for a private meeting. At that time, both Truman and Stevenson remained tightlipped—at least publicly—about their near-term political aspirations. It wasn’t until losing the March 10 New Hampshire primary to Tennessee Sen. Estes Kefauver that Truman formerly announced he would not seek reelection. Stevenson, on the other hand, did not participate in the Democratic primaries, and only received his party’s nomination after being “drafted” during the August convention. Regardless, Truman used the January White House meeting with Stevenson to gauge the political strengths and weaknesses of the Illinois governor. As this article shows, it was Stevenson’s single term as Illinois governor that made him a national figure. -
An Inventory of Local Governments in Illinois
AN INVENTORY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN ILLINOIS February 25, 2021 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 DIFFERENCES AMONG REPORTING AGENCIES ........................................................................................................... 3 MAJOR FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Additional Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 10 METHODOLOGY & DATA ......................................................................................................................................... 10 OVERVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ........................................................................................................ 13 DESCRIPTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ................................................................................................................. 13 General Purpose Local Governments ................................................................................................................ 13 Special Purpose Local Governments ................................................................................................................. 15 POPULATIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN ILLINOIS ............................................................................................ -
160 N.W.2D 107 (N.D
N.D. Supreme Court Melland v. Johanneson, 160 N.W.2d 107 (N.D. 1968) Filed July 3, 1968 [Go to Documents] IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Robert B. Melland, Warren G. Allen, John Decker, J. R. Bernabucci, Jr., Donald A. Peterson, Roger T. Melroe, and Clinton Ottmar, each for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Helgi Johanneson, as Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, and his successors in office, and Ben Meier, as the Secretary of State of the State of North Dakota, and his successors in office, Defendants and Appellants. Civil No. 8473 [160 N.W.2d 109] Syllabus by the Court 1. In light of the great importance of this case and in light of N.D.C.C. § 32-23-12, which requires that our declaratory judgment statutes be construed and administered liberally, we find that a justiciable controversy exists between the defendants and each of the plaintiffs. 2. A law enacted by the legislature is presumed to be constitutional unless it is shown that it is manifestly violative of the organic law. 3. In considering challenges to the constitutionality of an initiated measure, every reasonable presumption in favor of its constitutionality prevails. 4. Whether a holding shall be adhered to or modified or overruled is a question within the discretion of the court under the circumstances of the case under consideration. 5. Sections 11 and 20 of the North Dakota Constitution and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution do not prohibit or prevent classification, provided such classification is reasonable for the purpose of legislation, is based on proper and justifiable distinctions considering the purpose of the law, is not clearly arbitrary, and is not a subterfuge to shield one class or to burden another or to oppress unlawfully in its administration. -
Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly, and Freedom of Religion Under the Illinois Constitution, 21 Loy. U. Chi. LJ 91
UIC School of Law UIC Law Open Access Repository UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1989 Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly, and Freedom of Religion under the Illinois Constitution, 21 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 91 (1989) Michael P. Seng John Marshall Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael P. Seng, Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly, and Freedom of Religion under the Illinois Constitution, 21 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 91 (1989). https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs/272 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freedom of Speech, Press and Assembly, and Freedom of Religion under the Illinois Constitution Michael P. Seng* The first amendment' acts as a limitation on all governmental action in the United States, whether it be federal, state or local and as a limitation on private action for, or supported by, the govern- ment.2 Quite literally, our status as the world's greatest democracy is coterminous with the first amendment. We judge our govern- ment and we judge other governments largely on the extent to which "first amendment" freedoms are recognized and respected. The first amendment is the bedrock upon which all of our other liberties are built.3 The central role of the first amendment in protecting freedom of thought and speech in the United States is of relatively recent ori- gin. -
The Mysterious Lockstep Doctrine and the Future of Judicial Federalism in Illinois
2_ANDERSON.DOCX 4/29/2013 9:29 AM The Mysterious Lockstep Doctrine and the Future of Judicial Federalism in Illinois Hon. John Christopher Anderson* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 966 I. THE JUDICIAL FEDERALISM DEBATE ............................................... 967 A. Evolution of Judicial Federalism in the United States ............ 967 B. The Arguments in the Dependent-Independent Debate .......... 969 II. ANALYZING THE LOCKSTEP DOCTRINE IN ILLINOIS JURISPRUDENCE .............................................................................. 971 A. Gardner’s Hypothesized Influences over a State Court’s Decision to Accept or Reject Judicial Federalism .................. 971 B. Does Illinois Jurisprudence Support Gardner’s Hypotheses and Observations? ................................................................... 974 C. Why Does Illinois Prefer a Lockstep Approach? .................... 978 1. Theories of the Judicial Decision-making Process ........... 978 2. Other Commonly Asserted Factors External to the Court ................................................................................. 987 3. What Does the Illinois Supreme Court Say? .................... 989 a. Legislative History of the Illinois Bill of Rights ........ 989 b. Major Illinois Supreme Court Cases Considering the Lockstep Doctrine Prior to Caballes .................... 992 c. People v. Caballes .................................................... 1001 III. WHERE DO THE ILLINOIS