DOCSLIB.ORG

Senator Partee. Will the Senate Please Come *' to Order? .The Prayer Will Be Delivered by Father 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Senator Partee. Will the Senate Please Come *' to Order? .The Prayer Will Be Delivered by Father 4 GENERAL SESSION of the 78th GENEPZL ASSEMBLY October 16, 1973 PRESIDENT: 2. Senator Partee. Will the Senate please come *' to order? .The prayer will be delivered by Father 4. Charles Olshefsky: Direckor of Vocations for the Diocese of Springfield, professor of theology 6 . at the Seminary of the Immaculake Conceptiop and paskor of St. Mary's Parish in Farmersville. 8. Father Olshefsky. (Prayer given by Eather Olshefsky) l0. PRESIDENT: ll. Reading of the Journal. Senator Soper. Senator Soper. l2. SECRETARY: Thursday, June 21, 1973, 1Q:3B o'clock apm. l4. SENATOR SOPERZ l5. .. .Mr. President, Members of the Senate, I move 16. that we dispense with the further reading of the Journal of June 2ls: and unless there are some additions l8. or corrections to be made by one of the Senators that the l9. Journal stand approved. 20. PRESIDENT: Yourve heard the motion, Senator Soper moves that khe Journal referred to stand approved. Al1 in 23. favor signify by saying aye. Conkrary no. Moti'on 24. carries. SECRETARY : 26. Priday, June 22nd 1973. 27. PRESIDENT : q 28. Senator Soper. 29. EENATOR SOPER: 30. Mr. President, Mdmbers of the Fenate. I move that 3l. the...we dispqnse with the furkher reading of the 32. Journal of June 22nd and unless there are some corrections 33. or additions to be made thak the Journal stand approved. l PRESIDENT: 2. Senator Soper moves that Me dispense with 3. further reading of thd Journal of June 22nd. All 4. in favor signify by saying aye. Contrary no. Motion carries. SECRETARY: Saturday, June 23rd 1973. 8. SENATOR SOPER: Mr. President lI moye that we dispense with l0. the further reading of the Journal of June 23rd ll. and unless there are some corrections or additions l2. to be made that theo..lournal stand approved. PRESIDENT: 14. Senator Soper moves that the Journal for l5. Saturday June 23rd be.woapproved without further 1 6 . reading. Any discussion? A11 in favor signify iY saying aye. l8. SENATOR SOPER: l9. Aye. 20. PRESIDENT: Contrary no. The motion carries. SECRETARY: 23.. Monday , June 25th 1973. 24. SENATOR SOPER: 25. Mr. President, I move that We dispense with 26. the furthez reading of the Journal of June 25th 27. unless there are some additions or corrections to $ 28. be made that khe Journal stand approved. 29. PRESIDBNT: 30. SenaEor Soper makes the same motion relative 3l. to the Journal for Saturday ...of Sunday, June 20... SENATOR'SOPER: 32. Monday@ 2 . 1. PRESIDENT: ' 2. Monday, June... 3. SENATOR SOPER: 4. 25th. ' . 5. PRESIDENT : ' 6. 25. Any discussion? Al1 in favor signify . 7. by saying aye. 8. SCNATOR SOPER: 9 AX** l0. PRESIDENT: 11. Contrary no. Motion carries. l2. SXCRETARY ; 13. Tuesday #June 26, 1973. 14. SENATOR SOPER: l5. Mr. President, I move that we dispense with l6. the further reading of the Journal of Juhe 26th. l7. Unless there are some additions or corractions to 18. be Made that the Journal stand approved . l9. PRESIDENT: 20. The motion is to approve the Journal of Tuesday, , 2l. June 2.6th. Any discussion? A1l in favor signify by 22. paying aye. Contrary no. The motion carries. 23. SSCRETARY, J4. Thursday, June 2:, 197:. 25. ;SNATOR SOPER: . i 26. ...1 think we have Wednesday the 27th: haven't ' 27. we, Mr. Secretary? 28. SSCRETARY : . ' 29. YeS. 3c. SSNATOR SOPER: 3 y . wednesday . 32. SECRETARY: . zq Yes. Wednesday, June 27th. 1 3 ' ' ; 1 . SENATOR SOPER: 2 . Mr. President, I move that we dispense with 3. the further reading 6f the Journar of June 27th. 4. Unless there are some additions or corrections to 5. be made that the Journal stand approved. 6. PRESIDENT: 7. You've...the motion is to approve the Journal 8. of Wednesday, June 27th. Any discussion? Al1 in 9. favor signify by saying aye. Contrary no.. l0. motion carries. SECM TARY : l2. Thursday, June 28, 1973. l3. SENATOR SOPER: l4. Mr. President, I move that we dispense with the further reading of Ehe Journal of June 28th. Unless there are some additions or corrections the Journal l7. stand approved. 12. PRESIDENT : l9. The motion is to approve the Journal of Thursday, 20. June 28th. Any discussion? All in favor signify by 2l. saying aye. 'Contrary no . Motion carries. 22. SECRETARY: 2 3 . Friday, June 29, 1973. 24. SINATOR :OPSR: 25. Mr. President, I move that we dispense with.the 26. further reading of the Journal of June 29th. Unless there are some additions or corrections to be made 28. that the Journal stand approved. 29. PRESIDENT: 30. The motion is to approve the.lournal of Thursday the 2:th...I'm sorry , Friday June 29. Any discussion? 32. A1l in favor signify by saying aye. 33. SENATOR SOPEB: 4 1. Aye. 2. PRESIDENT: 3. Contrary no. Mgtion éarried. 4. SECRETARY: 5. Saturday, June 30, 1973. 6. SENATOR SOPER : 7. Mr. Presidentz I move that we dispense with 8. the further reading of the Journal ofoooof June 30th 9. and unless there are some additions or corrections to 10. be made that the Journal stand approved. ll. PRESIDENT: l2. Motion is to approve the Journal of Sakurday, l3. June 30. Any discussion? Al1 in favor signify by 14. saying aye. Contrary no. Motion carries. l5. SECRETARY : l6. sunday, July 1, 1973. l7. SENATOR SOPER : l8. Mr. President, I move khak We dispense with l9. khe...reading of the Journal of July lst and unless 20. there are some additions or corrections ko be made 2t. that the Journal stand approved. 22. PRESIDENT: 23. Motion is to approve the Journal of Eunday, July 24. 1, 1973. Any discussion? All in favor signify by 2S. saying aye. Contrary no. The motion karrigs. 26. SECRETARY: 27. Monday, July 2, 1973. 28. SENATOR SOPIR: 29. Mr. President, I move 'that we dispense* with the 30. further reading of the Journal of July 2nd. Unless there are some additioné or correctians to 'be made 32. that the Journal stand approved. 33. PRESIDENT: 5 Motion is to approve the Journal of Monday, 2. July 2nd. Any discussion? Al1 in favor signify 3. by saying aye. .owsenator Nudelman, did you wish 4. to be recorded aye on the approval of the Journal 5. of July 2nd7 Opposed no. Motion carries. 6 . SENATOR SUPER: 'n Mr. President. 8. PRESIDENT: 9. Senator Soper. SENATOR SOPER: l1. I move Ehat we postpone the reading of the l2. Journal of October 15 pending the arrival of the printed Journal. RRESIDENT : l5. The motion is to postpone further reading 16. of the Journal for Oatober 15 until the arrival of l7. the printed Journal. Any discussion? Al1 in l8. favor signify by saying aye. l9. SENATOR SOPER: 20. Aye. 2l. PRESIDENT: 22. Contrary no. The motion carries. Yeah. 23. Committee reports. 24. SECRETARY: 25. The Committee on Rules reports the following 26. proposed amendments to the Senate Rules. 27. PRESIDENT: 2B. Senator Graham. SENATOR GRAHAM: 30. Mr. President, Members of the Senate, 'each member 31. of the Senate has on his desk a çopy of the proposed 32. rules , rule ehanges submitted by a unanimous vote of 33. the Rules Coe ittee and I move you at this time #-. ..- .. .w. 6 Mr. President that we adopt the rule change suggested for Senate Rule 3l. 3. PRESIDENT: 4. Is there discussion? Senator Knuepfer. .Ex- 5. cuse me, Senator Fm uepfer, I believe a1l members have 6 . the proposed amendmenl and the recommendatiom from the' Rules Committee on their desks. No, we are discussing 8. Rule 31. 31. Senator Knuepfer. 9. SENATOR IG UEPPER:, l0. Wellz I want to address myself to this for a ll. Doment. I think it is the same rule that we had in 12. effect in khe month of June last year and I guess I understood the necessity of it in view of the fact that we donst have the electronic roll call and some l5. of the other things. And I can see that it has some l6. desirable features in this particular Session but khe l7. proposal here is to adopt this rule as a permanent rulc. ...Th1s is supposed to be a deliberative Body. l9. Welve had a great deal of debate on many issues. ' Issues 20. like no fault insurance. And it just seems to me that 2l. this cûts debate far short of what this Body ought to permit. ...One of the differences I think between this 23. Body and the House is the degree of deliberation Which 24. we bave normally .given'to matters of some consequence. 25. And it seems to me that by buying this as a'permanent 26. rulcoo.we do violence to the possibility of deliberation. 27. I've had my mind changed by debate on this Floor. I would 28. still like t6 have it changed but when we y re goi' ng to .limit 29. someone to five minutes...l think the limitatlon is much 30. too séort in terms of some of the complexities of the bills 3l. that We deal with. ...1 personally can't buy Ehis as a 32. permanent rule. I could buy it as' an emergency rule in June. I could buy it as a rule fôr this. sesàion'. But 7 I donlt...it doepnlt make sense to me for a rale to 2. go into next years' Session when I think we ought to 3. again become a deliberative Body. PRESIDING OFFICER (SENATOR WEAVER): Senator Graham. 6. SENATOR GRAHM I: In reply ko the Senator from Elmhurst, think 8. one of the salient points brought forth in this pro- posed rule change is that no Senator shall speak more l0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Settlement of Illinois, 1778{Protect
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830 by Arthur Clinton Boggess This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The Settlement of Illinois, 1778-1830 Author: Arthur Clinton Boggess Release Date: October 9, 2010 [Ebook 34049] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SETTLEMENT OF ILLINOIS, 1778-1830*** Chicago Historical Society's Collection.—Vol. V. The Settlement of Illinois 1778-1830 by Arthur Clinton Boggess, Ph.D. Professor of History and political Science in Pacific University; a Director of the Oregon Historical Society; sometime Harrison Scholar in American History in the University of Pennsylvania; sometime Fellow in American History in the University of Wisconsin. Chicago Published by the society 1908 Contents Preface. .2 Chapter I. The County of Illinois. .4 Chapter II. The Period of Anarchy in Illinois. 33 Chapter III. 62 I. The Land and Indian Questions. 1790 to 1809. 62 II. Government Succeeding the Period of Anarchy, 1790 to 1809. 73 III. Obstacles to Immigration. 1790 to 1809. 81 Chapter IV. Illinois During Its Territorial Period. 1809 to 1818. 89 I. The Land and Indian Questions. 89 II. Territorial Government of Illinois. 1809 to 1818. 100 IV. Transportation and Settlement, 1809 to 1818. 107 IV. Life of the Settlers. 117 Chapter V. The First Years of Statehood, 1818 to 1830.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction SAMUEL W. WITWER* It is hard to believe that almost twenty years have passed since the people of Illinois, pursuant to the old 1870 Illinois Constitution, voted in 1968 to call the Sixth Illinois Constitutional Convention which drafted our present Constitution. For most, if not all of the surviving delegates, numbering about 90 out of the original 116, the convention was an unforgettable experience, a highlight of our lives full of exciting and often dramatic events that we still recall as if they happened only yesterday. We have all watched with interest the application and interpretation of our common brain-child, the 1970 Illinois Constitution, over the intervening years. One of the new provisions of the 1970 Constitution is the "automatic 20-year question" provided in Article XIV, Section l(b), which for the first time in Illinois history, allows the people of our state to decide every twenty years whether or not to call a convention. This means that the General Assembly no longer has the sole discretion with respect to launching constitutional conventions. The Secretary of State, acting in a purely ministerial capacity, is required to place the question of calling a convention on the November general election ballot every twenty years unless within such period the General Assembly has done so. Inasmuch as the General Assembly has not done so since 1968, the automatic question provision of Section 1(b) has been triggered. One of the reasons for the automatic provision was the fact that the 1870 Constitution had become virtually unamendable. It was the hope of the delegates to the 1969-70 convention that at reasonable intervals the people of our state would review their basic law and determine whether there were provisions needful of amendment and, if so, whether revisions should occur by separate amendments legis- latively submitted or, instead, by the holding of an unlimited conven- tion to deal with the Constitution in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Study Guide Study Constitution
    of the and the United States States United State of Illinois State Published by the Illinois Community College Board College the Illinois Community by Published Constitution Study Guide Study Constitution Illinois Community College Board 401 East Capitol Avenue Springfield, Illinois 62701-1711 The Illinois Community College Board ensures equal employment/educational opportunities/affirmative action regardless of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, or handicap. Produced by Curriculum Publications Clearinghouse • Western Illinois University • Horrabin Hall 71B • Macomb, IL 61455 • (800) 322-3905 TABLE OF CONTENTs Part One: The Declaration of Independence................................................... 1 . Declaring.Independence............................................................................ 1 . Excerpts.from.the.Declaration.of.Independence.................................... 2 Part Two: The U.S. Constitution......................................................................... 5 . U.S..Constitution.Outline........................................................................... 5 . Writing.the.Constitution:.Introduction.................................................... 6 . Writing.the.Constitution:.The.Federal.System.and.. Separation.of.Powers............................................................................ 12 . Article.I:.The.Legislative.Branch............................................................. 17 . How.a.Bill.Becomes.a.Law.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Galahad & the Pols
    Core Idea: CARE Reform government. “Sir Galahad & the Pols” January 28, 1952 Time magazine cover story about Adlai Stevenson II, January 28, 1952 issue Excerpt: If Lincoln Steffens* was right, corruption is the norm of U.S. political life; in spite of reform, the pols always come back; the Sir Galahads, sooner or later, get licked, or get laughed out of court, or join the gang. But men like Adlai Stevenson have dedicated themselves to a more hopeful and more dynamic proposition: that the U.S. is not a static pattern but a still-continuing experiment—an experiment, among other things, in good government. *Steffens was an early twentieth-century muckraking journalist. Background: Although this Time magazine cover story ran six months prior to the Democratic National Convention, it was a clear indication that party leaders, including President Harry S. Truman, were increasingly interested in Stevenson and his political future. One week before this article appeared on newsstands, Truman invited Stevenson to the White House for a private meeting. At that time, both Truman and Stevenson remained tightlipped—at least publicly—about their near-term political aspirations. It wasn’t until losing the March 10 New Hampshire primary to Tennessee Sen. Estes Kefauver that Truman formerly announced he would not seek reelection. Stevenson, on the other hand, did not participate in the Democratic primaries, and only received his party’s nomination after being “drafted” during the August convention. Regardless, Truman used the January White House meeting with Stevenson to gauge the political strengths and weaknesses of the Illinois governor. As this article shows, it was Stevenson’s single term as Illinois governor that made him a national figure.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Local Governments in Illinois
    AN INVENTORY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN ILLINOIS February 25, 2021 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 DIFFERENCES AMONG REPORTING AGENCIES ........................................................................................................... 3 MAJOR FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Additional Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 10 METHODOLOGY & DATA ......................................................................................................................................... 10 OVERVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ........................................................................................................ 13 DESCRIPTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ................................................................................................................. 13 General Purpose Local Governments ................................................................................................................ 13 Special Purpose Local Governments ................................................................................................................. 15 POPULATIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN ILLINOIS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Efficient, Effective, and Streamlined Government to Illinois
    DELIVERING EFFICIENT, EFFECTIVE, AND STREAMLINED GOVERNMENT TO ILLINOIS TAXPAYERS Final report submitted by: Task Force on Local Government Consolidation and Unfunded Mandates In consultation with: Office of the Lieutenant Governor, Evelyn Sanguinetti and Northern Illinois University, Center for Governmental Studies Approved by the Task Force on December 17, 2015 148 N. Third Street DeKalb, IL 60115 [email protected] December 15, 2015 Hon. Evelyn Sanguinetti Lieutenant Governor, State of Illinois 214 State Capitol Springfield, IL Dear Lt. Governor Sanguinetti: Illinois has long been recognized as having the largest number of governmental units and relatively high effective property tax rates. Much of the existing governmental structure was created under very different conditions that determined how public services are delivered. Concern about the large number of governmental units in Illinois, compared with other states, has triggered several attempts in the past to update or modernize the current delivery system. Closely related to the costs of delivering local public services are mandates imposed by state government, often without input from local officials or funding sources. While the State of Illinois has a State Mandates Act, frequently the costs imposed on local governments are not calculated or disclosed. In February, 2015, Governor Bruce Rauner, through Executive Order 15-15, created the Government Consolidation and Unfunded Mandates Task Force which you chair. The Center for Governmental Studies at Northern Illinois University is pleased to have worked with the Task Force in data-gathering activities to inform analyses and recommendations to the Governor. We hope that our analyses provide a basis for useful implementation activities as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln in Illinois
    ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN ILLINOIS A SELECTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE ILLINOIS STATE ARCHIVES TEACHER’S MANUAL by Illinois State Archives Staff David Joens, Director Dr. Wayne C. Temple, Deputy Director Elaine Shemoney Evans Dottie Hopkins-Rehan Timothy Mottaz John Reinhardt Lori Roberts Mark Sorensen ILLINOIS STATE ARCHIVES OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SPRINGFIELD 2008 ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN ILLINOIS A SELECTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE ILLINOIS STATE ARCHIVES TEACHER’S MANUAL by Illinois State Archives Staff David Joens, Director Dr. Wayne C. Temple, Deputy Director Elaine Shemoney Evans Dottie Hopkins-Rehan Timothy Mottaz John Reinhardt Lori Roberts Mark Sorensen ILLINOIS STATE ARCHIVES OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SPRINGFIELD 2008 Funding for the production of the Abraham Lincoln in Illinois teaching packet was awarded by the Illinois State Library (ISL), a Division of the Office of Secretary of State, using funds provided by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), under the federal Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA). Printed by the Authority of the State of Illinois PO# 09AV01500 11/08 3.7M CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................2 Use of Documents ................................................................................................................4 Historical Background
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 Race for Governor of Illinois: Rauner Vs. Pritzker John Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC The imonS Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Simon Public Policy Institute) 1-2019 The 2018 Race for Governor of Illinois: Rauner vs. Pritzker John Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers This is Simon Review Paper #54 Recommended Citation Jackson, John. "The 2018 Race for Governor of Illinois: Rauner vs. Pritzker." (Jan 2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute) by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Simon Review The 2018 Race for Governor of Illinois: Rauner vs. Pritzker By Dr. John S. Jackson Paper #54 January 2019 A Publication of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Author’s note- Sincere thanks to Cary Day and Bradley Marks for assistance in making the maps in Appendix A-E, and to John Foster and John Shaw for their review and advice. 2 THE SIMON REVIEW The Simon Review papers are occasional papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. These papers examine and explore policy issues within the scope of the Institute’s mission and in the tradition of the University. Production and distribution of this paper is supported by the generosity of donors to the Friends of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Local History Collection
    Illinois and Local History at the Dixon Public Library Illinois and Local History at the Dixon Public Library Welcome to our Illinois and Local History Collection At the Dixon Public Library, we are very proud of our Illinois and Local History Collection, which covers Dixon, Lee County, and Illinois. It’s not limited to history though, with books on subjects as diverse as sports, wildlife, politics, and travel in the collection. Over the four and a half years we have gathered together over 3300 items, including 1550 distinct titles. Over 650 of these are available to be checked out, and the rest can be consulted at the library. We have more work to do and are excited by what there is still left to find. We are in the process of building an online collection of local history resources at the Illinois Digital Archive. Our Dixon College online collection can be found at https://tinyurl.com/dpldixoncollege and our Dixon History online collection is located at https://tinyurl.com/dpldigitaldixon. If you have any local history materials you would like to donate to the library, I would be very happy to see if they would fit into the collection. What follows is a complete list of the titles that we have currently available, along with notes on how they may be used. Antony Deter, Director A note on using this guide Items are listed by call number. Those items with call numbers starting with LH (Local History) are available to be checked out. These are available on the east side of the 1900 building.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Local Government
    CHAPTER TEN: ILLINOIS LOCAL GOVERNMENT By Gary Koch To a casual observer, local government in Illinois is a myriad of authoritative bodies crisscrossing each other over geographical, political, ideological and sometimes imaginary boundaries. In a weak moment, even veteran local officials may agree with this assessment. According to 1999 - 2000 statistics from the State Comptroller, there are 7,277 local governments in Illinois, about 1,300 more than in the next closest state, Pennsylvania. This figure includes some overlapping, however, and this translates into roughly 75,000 elected or appointed officials in Illinois, or one official for every 160 citizens. What exactly is a local government and why are there so many of them? In 1969, the Illinois Commission on Urban Area Government define a local government in Illinois as follows: 1. An artificial body created by the state. It administers and regulates local concerns of the population living in the area embraced within its corporate limits in matters particular to that place and not common to the state or any other government. 2. Performs duties not strictly local – serving as an involuntary political and civil subdivision of the state to deal with administration of matters too tedious for the state. 3. Owns and maintains properties and provides services for a fee.1 Local governments provide four basic functions: regulatory, service, political and corporate. Regulatory functions are those duties that help a government maintain order among its citizens. They can include police and fire protection, planning and zoning, building construction, animal and pollution control, health regulations and licensing of businesses and trades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appointive and Removal Power of the Governor of Illinois
    FERNHOLZ Bd row A.M. 19 15 i.a;.Bjn.j").>.'i>: THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive V in 2013 http://archive.org/details/appointiveremovaOOfern THE APPOINTIVE AND REMOVAL POWER OF THE GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS BY JOHN J. FERNHOLZ A. B. Indiana University, 1914 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1915 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL >. .J.uii.e.....4.., 191 5 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPER- VISION BY J.QM....J.. EERMH(:)[L2; _ ENTITLED .T.h.e Ap.p.D.in..t.iY.a....aM the....Remoyal Power of the Q.oy..e.riLO.T.....o.f. I.ll.iiioi.a BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF ]iaa±.ej£...3f..^-Ax^u2n..^«^ Sci.e|ic.e In Charge of Thesis Head of Department Recommendation concurred in :* Committee on Final Examination* *Required for doctor's degree but not for master's. PREFACE The subject of this paper was selected for the purpose of showing the historical growth of the governor's appointive and removal power under the three different state constitutions and legislative enactments thereunder, with judicial interpreta- tions. The treatise has teen divided into five chapters. Chap- ter I treats of the governor's appointive and removal power in general under the different state constitutions. Chapter II deals with the appointive and removal power of the governor of Illinois during the operating of the first constitution, and Chapters III and IV do likewise during the operation of the second and third constitutions respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrb10210055mst15375r*
    *LRB10210055MST15375r* HR0102 LRB102 10055 MST 15375 r 1 HOUSE RESOLUTION 2 WHEREAS, The State of Illinois is often regarded as having 3 two distinct regions, the urban Cook County area and downstate 4 Illinois; and 5 WHEREAS, Even communities north of Chicago are considered 6 "downstate" because their needs, interests, economies, and 7 cultures have more in common with rural southern and central 8 Illinois counties than they do with urban Cook County; and 9 WHEREAS, The majority of residents in downstate Illinois 10 disagree with urban Cook County on key policy issues; for 11 example, 61 outstate Illinois counties, from the Wisconsin 12 state line to the Kentucky state line, have approved 13 resolutions to become sanctuary counties for gun owners, while 14 the City of Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the 15 country; and 16 WHEREAS, The divide between urban Cook County and the rest 17 of Illinois is frequently manifested in electoral results such 18 as the 2010 gubernatorial election in which the winning 19 candidate carried only four out of 102 counties and, in fact, 20 did not need to carry any other counties to win because of the 21 margin of victory in urban Cook County; and HR0102 -2- LRB102 10055 MST 15375 r 1 WHEREAS, The U.S. Supreme Court ruling Reynolds v. Sims 2 (1964) removed the geographic element from districting for the 3 state legislature, and, as Illinois' U.S. Senator Everett 4 Dirksen warned, this caused power to be concentrated in 5 Chicago and resulted in rural areas losing their voice in 6 state government; and 7 WHEREAS, Article IV Section 4 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]