Municipality of North Middlesex 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Municipality of North Middlesex 2016 Source: Municipality of North Middlesex 2016 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................2 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.2 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 10 1.3 METHODOLOGY 14 2 BACKGROUND REVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 16 2.1 CURRENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK 16 2.2 RELEVANT STRATEGIES AND PLANS REVIEWED 18 2.3 COMMON THREADS ANALYSIS 19 3 THE NORTH MIDDLESEX ECONOMY ........................................................................................................... 23 3.1 KEY SECTOR ANALYSIS 26 4 REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY ASSETS ........................................................................................................ 33 4.1 REGIONAL ASSETS 33 4.2 COMMUNITY ASSETS 34 4.3 CULTURAL ASSETS 37 4.4 SCHOOLS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND PARK ASSETS 39 4.5 DEVELOPMENT LANDS 42 5 VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY ......................................................................................................................... 50 5.1 KEY FINDINGS 50 6 COMMUNITY SURVEY .................................................................................................................................... 56 6.1 TAPPING THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY 57 6.2 UNDERSTANDING PERCEPTIONS OF NORTH MIDDLESEX 61 6.3 DEFINING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 63 i North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 6.4 STRENGTHS FOR BUILDING A STRONGER ECONOMY IN NORTH MIDDLESEX 65 6.5 CHALLENGES/BARRIERS TO BUILDING A STRONGER ECONOMY IN NORTH MIDDLESEX 66 6.6 SATISFACTION WITH MUNICIPAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES 69 6.7 IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES FOR FUTURE GROWTH IN NORTH MIDDLESEX 71 6.8 MOVING FORWARD ON PRIORITIES 72 7 COMPETITIVENESS ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 75 7.1 STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND THREATS (SWOT) ANALYSIS 75 7.2 COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES 84 8 STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS AND TAKING ACTION ........................................................................................ 86 8.1 AN ECONOMIC VISION FOR NORTH MIDDLESEX 86 8.2 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 87 8.3 ACTION PLAN AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 89 8.4 IMPLEMENTATION TABLE 111 9 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 113 10 APPENDIX: TECHNICAL REPORT ............................................................................................................... 116 10.1 STRATEGIC INNOVATION IN MUNICIPALITIES 116 10.2 POLICY AND BACKGROUND REVIEW 121 10.3 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 142 10.4 OCCUPATIONAL PROFILE 148 10.5 BUSINESS PATTERNS ASSESSMENT 159 10.6 COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS 167 10.7 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS 181 ii North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 1) Introduction Introduction Executive Summary Terms and Definitions Methodology 1 North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 Source: Municipality of North Middlesex 2016 Source: Municipality of North Middlesex 2016 1 Introduction The Municipality of North Middlesex has a history that is firmly rooted in agriculture and farming. This, in part, defines both the local economy and the labour market, and has influenced both the businesses and the people who make up the community. Amalgamated in 2001 by bringing together the municipalities of the Village of Ailsa Craig; Town of Parkhill; Town of McGillivray; and, the Townships of East and West Williams, the municipality has a unique offering for its size in that there are two distinct downtown, commercial areas in the larger communities of Parkhill and Ailsa Craig. However, over the last two census periods (2001 to 2011) North Middlesex has experienced on-going population declines from 6,901 in 2001 to 6,658 in 2011. This decline of 3.5%, although not significant, is indicative that North Middlesex is facing challenges in a changing economy. While agriculture will remain an integral component of the local economy, it is necessary to explore and pursue new and innovative ways to diversify the local economic base. With the service and knowledge-based economy becoming a major driver of economic growth across North America, the roles of cities and regions are being reshaped and redefined in a shifting global economy. Cities and regions are emerging as key locations for finance and major centres for production and innovation, as well as research and development. The proximity of North Middlesex to the City of London provides the community the potential to adapt and leverage these changes for its own economic development needs. As major urban centres continue to expand outward, so to do the opportunities for rural municipalities to increase their population base and develop the local economy to support increased commercial and employment opportunities. This is an important factor as communities such as North Middlesex strive to retain their youth populations and attract new residents. Being conveniently positioned along main routes from more urbanized areas to key travel, recreation, and tourism destinations (e.g., Pinery Park, Lambton Shores, and Grand Bend among others) the municipality can benefit from leveraging its location, and explore opportunities to expand its commercial offerings and local amenities. Further, a lower cost of living, property, and a high quality, semi-rural to country lifestyle makes North Middlesex an appealing home location for families, professionals, and the self- employed looking to strike a work/life balance. The process of economic development is multi-disciplinary and multifaceted. It requires a collective effort and a team approach to derive the most beneficial results. The Municipality of North Middlesex is part of a two-tier government environment, and benefits from its inclusion in a broader regional and the southwestern Ontario economy. The long term success of the municipality will be tied not only to its ability to differentiate itself and understand and promote its unique value proposition, there needs to be a balance that compliments the greater economy it operates within. This will strengthen the municipality’s growth potential. 2 North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 The North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 provides the Municipality with the research, knowledge, and recommended initiatives to chart North Middlesex’s economic future, and establishes a shared, community-based economic vision and strategic priorities that outline the necessary steps that can be taken to bolster the community’s future growth and prosperity. It is a living document that should be reviewed regularly, and re-evaluated after its five year lifecycle to explore significant changes in the community, and to validate emerging and existing priorities. The strategy was developed through a lens that explored innovative approaches to thinking and to future implementation. This is important as North Middlesex is operating in an increasingly competitive environment where municipalities must explore new ways of approaching both service delivery and community sustainability. This thinking has been incorporated into the strategic planning process and balanced against what is realistically achievable. The goal is a “made in North Middlesex strategy”, that draws from best and promising practices and applies a local perspective that builds on local assets and strengths. 3 North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 1.1 Executive Summary The Municipality of North Middlesex has chosen to undertake its first formal Economic Development Strategy in order to address the challenges the community is facing (aging and declining population, youth outmigration, unrecognized development potential, declining agricultural employment, limited commercial businesses, and underperforming Downtowns). It is intended that this will be achieved by stimulating economic development opportunity through business retention and expansion, residential and commercial development, population and investment attraction, and building on the strong community networks and agricultural industry base. The North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 was created using a local level perspective, and includes significant levels of community and stakeholder engagement that ensures its findings, recommendations, actions, and conclusions are based in evidence. It contains a shared understanding among local community, business, and political leaders and reflects the priorities of economic development opportunities and goals for the future prosperity of North Middlesex. An important aspect of the Strategy is the establishment of an economic vision that will carry the municipality through the life of the plan and act as a rallying call to all community members and stakeholders as to what and where North Middlesex sees itself in the future. The following vision reflects the input, values, desires, and aspirations of the community: North Middlesex is known for its diversified, export- focused agricultural sector; two vibrant Downtown commercial centres underpinned by small business and entrepreneurship; and ongoing residential and employment growth supporting an increase in population and economic opportunity. 4 North Middlesex Economic Development Strategy 2015 – 2020 Based on the evidence
Recommended publications
  • Consent Agenda 2020.01.20
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ST. JOSEPH CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 20,2021 I a. Ken Leffler Receive Re: Request to open part of the walking trail for golf carts. 2-* a. Town of Lincoln Receive Re: Supporting Resolution re: Cannabis Retail Stores ;-t c. Region of Peel / Township of Huron-Kinloss Support Re: Property Tax Exemptions for Veteran Clubs 34a Loyalist Township Support Re: funding for community Groups and service clubs affected by pandemic lo ^t(e City of St. Catharines Receive Re: Development Approval Requirements for Landfills (Bill 197) 1213. Corporation of the Municipality of West Grey Support Re: Schedule 8 of the Provincial Budget Bill22g, Support and Recovery from COVtn- 19 Act tq - lJ g. Town of Kingsville / United Counties of Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry Support Re: Letter of Support for Small Businesses Itf 9 h. Municipality if Mississippi Mills Support Re: Request for Revisions to Municipal Elections Huron North Community Economic Alliance Receive 2cat' Re: Member Update for November 2020 eej General Hillier Receive Re: COVID-I9 Vaccination update 8?24U. Peter Julian, Mp - New Westminster - Burnaby Support Re: Canada Pharmacare Act M,d Solicitor General Receive Re: Community Safety and Well-Being Plan deadline extension Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Receive *l-X^.(J/ ' Re: Updates to Ontario Wildlife Damage Compensation Program (OWDCP) Qq$A. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Receive Re: Amendments to Drainage Act A4'o Ministry of Solicitor General Receive Re: Declaration of Provincial Emergency 3v41p Ministry of Transportation Receive Re: connecting the North: A Draft Transportation Plan for Northem ontario J6-L{l U.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Extent of Aquatic Protected Areas in the Great Lakes
    Status and Extent of Aquatic Protected Areas in the Great Lakes Scott R. Parker, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Jeff D. Truscott, Patrick L. Lawrence, Dan Kraus, Graham Bryan, and Mike Molnar Introduction The Laurentian Great Lakes are immensely important to the environmental, economic, and social well-being of both Canada and the United States (US). They form the largest surface freshwater system in the world. At over 30,000 km long, their mainland and island coastline is comparable in length to that of the contiguous US marine coastline (Government of Canada and USEPA 1995; Gronewold et al. 2013). With thousands of native species, including many endemics, the lakes are rich in biodiversity (Pearsall 2013). However, over the last century the Great Lakes have experienced profound human-caused changes, includ- ing those associated with land use changes, contaminants, invasive species, climate change, over-fishing, and habitat loss (e.g., Bunnell et al. 2014; Smith et al. 2015). It is a challenging context in terms of conservation, especially within protected areas established to safeguard species and their habitat. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), a protected area is “a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associat- ed ecosystem services and cultural values” (Dudley 2008). Depending on the management goals, protected areas can span the spectrum of IUCN categories from highly protected no- take reserves to multiple-use areas (Table 1). The potential values and benefits of protected areas are well established, including conserving biodiversity; protecting ecosystem structures and functions; being a focal point and context for public engagement, education, and good governance; supporting nature-based recreation and tourism; acting as a control or reference site for scientific research; providing a positive spill-over effect for fisheries; and helping to mitigate and adapt to climate change (e.g., Lemieux et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfront Regeneration on Ontario’S Great Lakes
    2017 State of the Trail Leading the Movement for Waterfront Regeneration on Ontario’s Great Lakes Waterfront Regeneration Trust: 416-943-8080 waterfronttrail.org Protect, Connect and Celebrate The Great Lakes form the largest group of freshwater During the 2016 consultations hosted by the lakes on earth, containing 21% of the world’s surface International Joint Commission on the Great Lakes, the freshwater. They are unique to Ontario and one of Trail was recognized as a success for its role as both Canada’s most precious resources. Our partnership is a catalyst for waterfront regeneration and the way the helping to share that resource with the world. public sees first-hand the progress and challenges facing the Great Lakes. Driven by a commitment to making our Great Lakes’ waterfronts healthy and vibrant places to live, work Over time, we will have a Trail that guides people across and visit, we are working together with municipalities, all of Ontario’s Great Lakes and gives residents and agencies, conservation authorities, senior visitors alike, an opportunity to reconnect with one of governments and our funders to create the most distinguishing features of Canada and the The Great Lakes Waterfront Trail. world. In 2017 we will celebrate Canada’s 150th Birthday by – David Crombie, Founder and Board Member, launching the first northern leg of the Trail between Waterfront Regeneration Trust Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury along the Lake Huron North Channel, commencing work to close the gap between Espanola and Grand Bend, and expanding around Georgian Bay. Lake Superior Lac Superior Sault Garden River Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Susanna Johnson
    Descendants of Susanna Johnson Generation 1 1. SUSANNA1 JOHNSON was born on 01 May 1812 in Weaverthorpe, East Yorkshire, England1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. She died on 27 Feb 1901 in Clinton, Huron Co., ON, CA7, 8, 9. She married (1) ALPHONSO S. ALLAN on 02 Apr 1832 in St James Anglican, Toronto, ON, CA10, 11, 12. He was born about 1812 in Vermont, USA13, 14, 15. He died before 186116. She married (2) WILLIAM WILSON on 28 May 1862 in York Co. (Toronto), ON, CA17. He was born about 1804 in England18, 19, 20, 21. He died on 29 Jul 18939. Notes for Alphonso S. Allan: He was in or near Toronto (York at the time) in 1830 and 1831 as evidenced by the letters waiting for him at the York post office. The Colonial Advocate published lists including his name for April 5, 1830 - A. S. Allen; June 5, 1830 - A. S. Allen; Sept 5, 1830 - Alphonso Allen; and, Dec 5, 1830 - A. S. Allen. In "Brown’s Toronto City and Home District Directory, 1846-1847", Alphonso Allen resided at Lot 6, Con 4, Toronto (township). {Leo & Walter Baldock, Henry Hetherington, possibly others were on same lot} In the 1880 census for New York, Co Niagara, Village of Lewiston, pg 11, ln 40, the following family: Alphonso Allen, aged 75, bo: Vermont Mary A, aged 43, Wife, bo: Canada Andrew, aged 19, son, bo: Canada Alphonso A, aged 17, bo: New York Frederick f, aged 14, bo: New York Michael C, aged 12, bo: New York Martha, aged 6, bo: New York Alexander, aged 4, bo: New York Could it be that our Alphonso simply left his first wife? Of course, he always gave Alphonso S, or A S.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Research Priorities for Lake Whitefish in the Upper Great
    DEVELOPING RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR LAKE WHITEFISH IN THE UPPER GREAT LAKES: RESULTS OF A WORKSHOP SPONSORED BY THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY TRUST AND GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Michigan State University February 27-28, 2018 Michigan Sea Grant Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Workshop Proceedings ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Workshop Goals and Desired Outcomes ............................................................................. 4 Presentations ....................................................................................................................... 4 Impacts of Whitefish Decline on the Tribal Commercial Fishery ..................................... 4 Lake Huron Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ................................................................ 5 Lake Michigan Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................ 7 Lake Superior Lake Whitefish Status and Trends ............................................................. 8 Lower Trophic Levels ........................................................................................................ 9 Factors affecting recruitment to fisheries and management implications ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Huron North Channel : Section 6
    Lake Huron North Channel : Section 6 p i v R a a er iver l n Rushbrook i Capreol R s h i v Cartier R Val 84 Legend / Légende e i Levack r v 8 Therese e Han awhide a r Waterfront Trail - On-road / Sur la route Washrooms / Washrooms 810 Onaping Lake u P Blezard Valley x r r S o Waterfront Trail - Off-road / Hors route e e 15 r a v Chelmsford Val Ca $ Commercial Area / Zone commerciale v b i i n y Lake ssagi l Wind Waterfront Trail - Gravel road / e aux c R s 86 Route en gravier i Dowling 35 80 Railway Crossing / Passage à niveau a h Azilda P s l i 55 Waterfront Trail - Proposed / Proposée P r n Copper Cliff o 8 a a 1 A Roofed Accommodation / Hébergement avec toiture p 24 v r Fairbank 5 S Alerts / Alertes Quirke k i * n Lively 12 Su Lake c $ Commercial Area / Zone commerciale i 5.0 Distance / Distance (km) Sables a 15 55 l Worthington liot Lake P High Falls 4 Naughton Other Trails - Routes / a Agnew D'autres pistes - Routes Wifi / Wifi 8 r k Lake Turbine Whitefish 42 Whitefish Lake Superior Water Trail / 38 10 Sec 553 Birch L. 17 Lake Sentier maritime du lac Supérieur Restaurants / Restaurants McKerrow 13Nairn Centre McVit Panache Hospital / Hôpital Webbwood Lake Burwa Serpent Chutes HCR Espanola LCBO Liquor Control Board of Ontario / Régie des alcools de l'Ontario River 12 Killarney Lakelands Attraction / Attraction Walford and Headwaters Beach / Plage Border Crossing / Poste de frontière gge Cutler 66 Massey 225 Spanish 53 Sagamok Willisville Parc provincial Campground / Camping Conservation Area / Zone de protection de la nature Killarney
    [Show full text]
  • April 12, 2017 Regular Council Agenda
    THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF HURON SHORES (17-08) April 12th, 2017 (Posted April 10th, 2017) 1. Call to Order – 7:00 p.m. 2. Agenda Review 3. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest 4. Adoption of Council Minutes Regular Meeting – March 22, 2017 Special Meeting – April 5, 2017 5. Adoption of Accounts 6. Delegations and Petitions 7. Council and Staff Reports 8. General Business a. Planning Act Matters b. By-laws 8b-1: By-law #17-24: to Establish the Fire Department Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Plan 8b-2. By-law #17-25: to Enter into a Seasonal Waste Site Key Agreement with Clear Lake Camp Inc. re: after-hours access to Ward 3 Landfill 8b-3. By-law #17-26: to Enter into a Seasonal Waste Site Key Agreement with Red Top Motor Inn & Restaurant re: after-hours access to Ward 3 Landfill 8b-4. By-law #17-27: to Authorize Contract with 4 Season’s Septic Service for Portable Toilet Facilities at Municipal Parks 8b-5. By-law #17-28: to Establish weight limit restrictions for Potomac Bridge 8b-6. By-law #17-29: to Establish weight limit restrictions for Boville (a.k.a. Schellekins) Bridge 8b-7. By-law #17-30: to assume additional lands for Jarrett Drive Road Allowance 8b-8. By-law #17-31: to assume additional lands for Emily Court Road Allowance c. Minutes - Boards and Committees 8c-1. Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC), February 2/17 8c-2. Mississagi River Monitoring Committee, April 6/16 8c-3. Iron Bridge Historical Museum Committee, February 28/17 - Member organizations 8c-4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Huron Environmental Objectives Were Developed to Compliment and Support the Lake Huron Fish Community Objectives
    A Report of the Environmental Objectives Working Group of the Lake Huron Technical Committee Great Lakes Fishery Commission January 08, 2007 Working Group Members: Arunas Liskauskas Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (Chairperson) Jim Johnson Michigan Department of Natural Resources Mark McKay Michigan Department of Natural Resources Tom Gorenflo Chippewa/Ottawa Resource Authority Aaron Woldt United States Fish and Wildlife Service Jim Bredin Michigan Department of Environmental Quality TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 Accountability and Roles................................................................................ 3 Integration and Implementation...................................................................... 4 Guiding principles........................................................................................... 5 Lake Huron Fish Community Objectives: An Overview ............................... 6 Procedure for Development of Environmental Objectives............................. 8 Draft Environmental Objectives for Lake Huron........................................... 9 Spawning and Nursery Habitats (wetlands) ........................................10 Spawning and Nursery Habitats (tributaries).....................................18 Spawning and Nursery Habitats (reefs) ................................................28 Shoreline Processes .......................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Elk Management Plan 2010 FINAL
    Elk Management Plan 2010 Cette publication hautement spécialisée Elk Management Plan n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du Règlement 411/97 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec Linda Maguire au ministère des Richesses naturelles au [email protected]. i Elk Management Plan 2010 FOREWORD The mission of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) is to manage Ontario’s natural resources in an ecologically sustainable way to ensure they are available for the enjoyment and use of future generations. MNR’s mandate includes providing leadership and oversight in the management of Ontario’s fish and wildlife resources. Ontario’s Elk Management Plan has been developed in the context of MNR’s strategic direction in Our Sustainable Future and Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy. Following the guidance from Ontario’s Cervid Ecological Framework, this plan leads Ontario’s elk management program in an evolution from a population restoration program to a sustainable management program for elk in Ontario. ii Elk Management Plan 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With this plan the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) together with its partners celebrates the success achieved by the Ontario Elk Restoration Program in restoring a species that was once extirpated from the province. MNR congratulates all the individuals, organizations, committees and volunteers that have helped re-establish and ensure the future of elk in Ontario, including: The Provincial Elk
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Districts, Voters on List and Votes Polled, Names and Addresses of Members of the House of Commons, As Elected at the Nineteenth General Election, Mar
    PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 69 9.—Electoral Districts, Voters on List and Votes Polled, Names and Addresses of Members of the House of Commons, as Elected at the Nineteenth General Election, Mar. 26, 1940—continued. Province and Popula­ Voters Votes Party Electoral District tion, on Polled Name of Member Affili­ P.O. Address 1931 List ation No. No. No. Quebec—concluded Montreal Island—cone St. Henry 78,127 46,236 31,282 BONNIEK, J. A. Lib. Montreal, Que. St. James 89,374 64,823 35,587 DuROCHER, E. .. Lib. Montreal, Que. St. Lawrence- St. George 40,213 29,416 18,544 CLAXTON, B Lib. Montreal, Que. St. Mary 77,472 49,874 30,289 DESLAURIERS, H1 Lib. Montreal, Que. Verdun 63,144 40,555 28,033 COTE, P. E Lib. Verdun, Que. Ontario— (82 members) Algoma East... 27,925 15,250 10,386 FARQUHAR, T. Lib. Mindemoya, Ont. Algoma West... 35,618 22,454 16,580 NIXON, G. E.. Lib. Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. Brant 21,202 12,980 9,229 WOOD, G. E Lib... Cainsville, Ont. Brantford City.. 32,274 21,607 15,762 MACDONALD, W. R Lib... Brantford, Ont. Bruce 29,842 19,359 12,781 TOMLINSON, W. R Lib... Port Elgin, Ont. Carleton 31,305 20,716 14,481 HYNDMAN, A. B.2 Cons. Carp, Ont. Cochrane 58,284 44,559 26,729 BRADETTE, J. A Lib... Cochrane, Ont. Dufferin-Simcoe. 27,394 19,338 10,840 ROWE, Hon. W. E.... Cons. Newton Robinson, Ont. Durham 25,782 17,095 12,254 RlCKARD, W. F Lib Newcastle, Ont. Elgin 43,436 30,216 20,902 MILLS, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislators and Legislatures of Ontario : a Reference Guide
    Msktor^s Ijegisl/itivcUkmy isktors a ofOntum a tvfenmceguide n/oCume 4/1984-1991 dt m m. Ontario Le^sktiveL3mt Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Forman, Debra, 1956- Legislators and legislatures of Ontario 4. 1984-1991. Contents: v. 1. 1792-1866. - v. 2. 1867-1929. ~ v. 3. 1930-1984. - v. - 0-7743- ISBN 0-7743-9021-2 (set). - 0-7743-9022-0 (v. 1). - 0-7743-9023-9 (v. 2). 9024-7 (v. 3). - 0-7729-9328-9 (v. 4). 3. 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly-History. 2. Ontario-Politics and government. Legislators-Ontario-History. I. Ontario. Legislative Library. II. Title. JL273.F6 1984 328.713'09 84-093008-9 1 1 Contents Foreword v Introduction vii Errata viii General Elections 1984-1991 1 Presidentsof the Executive Council 1984-1991 2 Alphabetical Index of Members 1792- 1991 3-27 Executive CouncUs of Ontario 1 984- 1 99 29-5 Death Notices Former Ontario MPPs 1984-1991 53-54 32nd Legislature 55-87 33rd Legislature 88-109 34th Legislature 110-181 35th Legislature 182-201 ® IV Foreword Approximately 5,200 men and women have served as Members of the House of Assembly of the Province of Upper Canada (1792-1841), as Members from Canada West in the Legislative Assembly of the united Province of Canada (1841-1867), and as Members of the legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario (1867-1991). In the past, identification or verification of a particular Member, Legislature or Electoral District has proved to be a tedious and time-consuming task for those researching Ontario's political history because the information is scattered in a great many sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Lake Huron in 2018
    THE STATE OF LAKE HURON IN 2018 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 2020-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures that will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize Sea Lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes two types of documents, those that are reviewed and edited for citation indexing and printing and those intended for hosting on the Commission’s website without indexing or printing. Those intended for citation indexing include three series: Technical Reports—suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission’s program (requires outside peer review); Special Publications—suitable for reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and Miscellaneous Publications—suitable for specialized topics or lengthy reports not necessarily endorsed by a working committee of the Commission. One series, Fishery Management Documents, is not suited for citation indexing.
    [Show full text]