DOCSLIB.ORG

Decision 2006-114

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decision 2006-114 Decision 2006-114 Request for Review and Variance of Decision 2005-031: Alberta Electric System Operator, Needs Identification Document Application, Edmonton-Calgary 500 kV Electric Transmission Facilities December 6, 2006 ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2006-114: Request for Review and Variance of Decision 2005-031: Alberta Electric System Operator, Needs Identification Document Application, Edmonton-Calgary 500 kV Electric Transmission Facilities December 6, 2006 Published by Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 640 – 5 Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G4 Telephone: (403) 297-8311 Fax: (403) 297-7040 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.eub.ca CONTENTS 1 DECISION............................................................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Deregulation and the New Regulatory Process for Transmission System Upgrades .... 3 2.2 The NID Application ..................................................................................................... 3 2.3 The Prehearing Meeting for the NID Application ......................................................... 4 2.4 The NID Hearing ........................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Decision 2005-031 ......................................................................................................... 6 2.5.1 Legislative Framework for Section 34 Decisions............................................. 6 2.5.2 Step 1: Need to Upgrade the N-S Transmission System .................................. 6 2.5.3 Step 2: Was AESO’s Preferred Concept Reasonable and in the Public Interest?............................................................................................................. 7 3 THE REQUESTS TO REVIEW DECISION 2005-031 ........................................................ 8 3.1 The Board’s Authority to Review Its Own Decisions ................................................... 8 3.2 The Review Requests..................................................................................................... 9 4 THE REVIEW HEARING .................................................................................................. 10 4.1 Notice and Information Sessions ................................................................................. 10 4.2 Hearing Participants..................................................................................................... 10 4.3 The Review Hearing .................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Preliminary and Interlocutory Motions........................................................................ 12 4.5 Issues............................................................................................................................ 12 5 PRELIMINARY MATTERS............................................................................................... 13 5.1 The Filing of a Transmission Facility Application by AltaLink.................................. 13 5.2 Lavesta’s Jurisdictional and Process Concerns............................................................ 13 5.3 Allegation of Lack of Proper Notice............................................................................ 14 5.4 Allegation that the Board Improperly Limited the Scope of the Review Hearing....... 14 5.5 Allegation of Noncompliance with Section 28 of the Transmission Regulation......... 15 5.6 Allegation of Lack or Loss of Jurisdiction................................................................... 16 5.7 Allegation of Bias in the Proceedings.......................................................................... 16 6 THE PUBLIC INTEREST................................................................................................... 17 7 WAS AESO’S METHODOLOGY FOR ITS HIGH-LEVEL COMPARISON OF CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES REASONABLE?............................................................. 18 7.1 Views of the Parties ..................................................................................................... 18 7.2 Views of the Review Panel .......................................................................................... 19 8 HIGH-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL, LANDOWNER, AND AGRICULTURAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE WEST CORRIDOR............................................................... 21 8.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 21 8.2 Agricultural Impacts..................................................................................................... 23 8.2.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 23 8.2.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 26 8.3 Residential Impacts (Population Density/Future Development/Land Value).............. 28 8.3.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 28 8.3.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 32 EUB Decision 2006-114 (December 6, 2006) • i 8.4 Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................ 34 8.4.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 34 8.4.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 37 8.5 Electrical Considerations ............................................................................................. 38 8.5.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 38 8.5.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 49 8.6 Visual Impacts.............................................................................................................. 52 8.6.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 52 8.6.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 53 8.7 Special Constraints....................................................................................................... 54 8.7.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 54 8.7.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 55 9 HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPACTS ................................................................................. 56 9.1 Views of Parties ........................................................................................................... 56 9.2 Views of the Review Panel .......................................................................................... 57 10 IMPACTS ON FIRST NATIONS....................................................................................... 57 10.1 Traditional Lands ......................................................................................................... 57 10.2 Consultation ................................................................................................................. 58 10.3 Views of the Review Panel .......................................................................................... 60 11 OTHER MATTERS............................................................................................................. 60 11.1 Did AESO Apply for and Did the Board Approve a Transportation and Utility Corridor?..................................................................................................................... 60 11.1.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 60 11.1.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 61 11.2 Transmission Losses .................................................................................................... 62 11.2.1 Views of the Parties ........................................................................................ 62 11.2.2 Views of the Review Panel............................................................................. 63 12 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................... 63 13 ORDER ............................................................................................................................ 65 APPENDIX A MAP OF THE CORRIDORS ............................................................................ 67 APPENDIX B ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................... 68 APPENDIX C HEARING PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................ 70 APPENDIX D EUB RULINGS ON APPREHENSION OF BIAS ........................................... 73 APPENDIX E EUB RULINGS ON PRELIMINARY AND INTERLOCUTORY MOTIONS....................................................................... 76 ii • EUB Decision 2006-114 (December 6, 2006) ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Document Keephills Ellerslie Genesee Area Transmission Constraint Management ID #2013-004R
    Information Document Keephills Ellerslie Genesee Area Transmission Constraint Management ID #2013-004R Information Documents are not authoritative. Information Documents are for information purposes only and are intended to provide guidance. In the event of any discrepancy between an Information Document and any Authoritative Document(s)1 in effect, the Authoritative Document(s) governs. 1 Purpose This Information Document relates to the following Authoritative Document: Section 302.1 of the ISO rules, Real Time Transmission Constraint Management (“Section 302.1”). The purpose of this Information Document is to provide additional information regarding the unique operating characteristics and resulting constraint conditions and limits on the Keephills Ellerslie Genesee cutplane of the Alberta interconnected electric system. Section 302.1 sets out the general transmission constraint management protocol steps the AESO uses to manage transmission constraints in real time on the Alberta interconnected electric system. These steps are referenced in Table 1 of this Information Document as they are applied to the Keephills Ellerslie Genesee area. 2 General The Keephills Ellerslie Genesee cutplane is defined as the flows across the Keephills 240/138 kV transformer and all transmission lines connecting the Keephills and Genesee substations to the Alberta interconnected electric system. To ensure the safe and reliable operation of the Alberta interconnected electric system, the AESO has established operating limits for the Keephills Ellerslie Genesee cutplane, and has developed policies and procedures to manage Keephills Ellerslie Genesee cutplane transmission constraints. The AESO has provided a geographical map of the Keephills Ellerslie Genesee area indicating bulk transmission lines in Appendix 2 of this Information Document.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkland County, Follow Us Or Visit Parklandcounty.Com
    QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER PUBLISHED BY PARKLAND WINTER 2017 communicator QUESTIONS, CONCERNS AND/OR COMMENTS? Contact Us To find out more on what’s happening in Parkland County, follow us or visit parklandcounty.com Message from New Business Sustainable It's an Municipal New Cottage Snow Removal the Mayor Directory Communities Election Year! Development Plan Industry Bylaw Priorities Refresh MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR - WHAT'S AHEAD FOR 2017 With a New Year comes a new political and economic landscape. Parkland County must be decisive and proactive as we navigate the economic downturn that brought on the drop in the price of oil and gas and changes to the Municipal Government Act. There are challenges ahead, but there are also many opportunities. In order to capitalize on these opportunities, Parkland County is revising its Municipal Development Plan (MDP), the guiding statutory plan that frames our strategic growth and development. These revisions will incorporate a coordinated and systematic approach for future land use, growth Mayor Rod Shaigec patterns and infrastructure systems. We will also Find Local Businesses! update our Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) - a long-term plan ensuring Parkland County’s long-term sustainability by taking into consideration and balancing Are you looking for a Parkland County business? It is now easier than ever to connect environmental, cultural, social and economic factors. Both plans will be developed with with local businesses through the new online business directory. Residents can search extensive consultation with all County stakeholders. for businesses online and receive access to information about local businesses on the County’s website (directory.parklandcounty.com).
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Efficiency of Alberta's Electrical Supply System Project
    A Study on the Efficiency of Alberta’s Electrical Supply System Project # CASA-EEEC-02-04 For Clean Air Strategic Alliance (CASA) October 2004 Prepared by ALBERTA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY SYSTEM EFFICIENCY STUDY Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge Donna Tingley, Executive Director of CASA and the following members of the CASA Electrical Efficiency and Conservation Team for their valuable input and direction for this project: Denise Chang-Yen, EPCOR Jennifer Cummings, Direct Energy Franz Diepstraten, Direct Energy Shannon Flint, Alberta Environment Gordon Howell, Howell-Mayhew Engineering Rick Hyndman, CAPP Simon Knight, Climate Change Central Phyllis Kobasiuk, AAMDC Bevan Laing, Alberta Energy Glenn MacIntyre, Direct Energy Brian Mitchell, Mewassin Community Action/ CO2RE Jesse Row, Pembina Institute Kim Sanderson, CASA Secretariat Nashina Shariff, Toxics Watch Brian Waddell, Alberta Environment Respectfully submitted, Project Team Dave Miller and Marcel Chorel JEM Energy & Associates 831 – 7th Ave. SW Calgary, AB T2P 1A2 Tel: 403-860-6361 Fax: 403-508-2858 2 ALBERTA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY SYSTEM EFFICIENCY STUDY Table of Contents I. Executive Summary _________________________________________________ 4 II. Introduction______________________________________________________ 6 III. Methodology____________________________________________________ 11 IV. Generation______________________________________________________ 12 V. Transmission and Distribution ________________________________________ 35 VI. Conclusions_____________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Transalta Energy Corporation
    Decision 2002-014 TransAlta Energy Corporation 900-MW Keephills Power Plant Expansion Application No. 2001200 February 2002 Alberta Energy and Utilities Board ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2002-014: TransAlta Energy Corporation 900 - MW Keephills Power Plant Expansion Application No. 2001200 February 2002 Published by Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 640 – 5 Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3G4 Telephone: (403) 297-8311 Fax: (403) 297-7040 Web site: www.eub.gov.ab.ca ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD TransAlta Energy Corporation TRANSALTA ENERGY CORPORATION 900 MW KEEPHILLS POWER PLANT EXPANSION CONTENTS 1 THE APPLICATION AND HEARING............................................................................ 1 1.1 The Application ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Hearing and the Participants............................................................................ 1 1.3 Existing Plant.......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Project Summary..................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Review and Participation by Federal Government Agencies ................................. 4 2 ROLE AND AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD REGARDING APPLICATIONS FOR ELECTRIC GENERATION PLANTS............................................................................. 4 3 ISSUES ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parkland News
    Parkland News Fall 2015 Upcoming Events In this Issue: President’s message New Members Fall Banquet Sept 12, 2015 Fall Banquet Post Offices of Annual Gen Meeting October Luncheon and AGM N. Alberta Oct 1, 2015 Festival of Trees Spring BBQ Recap Travel Nov 26-29 Santa Letter Writing Santa Letter Writing Executive Nov 30 – Dec 22 Obits . President’s Message A mid-summer greeting to all members of Heritage Club web site which I urge you Parkland Chapter. all to visit. These notifications are also I certainly hope you all are having a contained in this newsletter. wonderful summer so far, it has certainly I would like to extend a welcome to all been a scorcher. I wish to thank new members who have joined our ranks everyone who participated in the Spring so far this year and hope you all benefit BBQ. It was a great success. As we from your new membership. proceed toward fall your executive and I I also extend our sincerest sympathy to are focusing on the upcoming fall events. all who have lost loved ones. We will be organizing the gala fall banquet So for the remainder of this hot dry and getting ready for our Annual General summer, I wish you all the best. May your Meeting and election of officers. The health be with you and to use an old other major winter project is the Santa expression “SEE YOU IN THE FALL”. Letter Writing Program. The notifications of time and place of Lloyd Rogowski these events are posted in the new President Parkland Chapter WE’RE ON-LINE: Our website; www.heritageclub.ca has undergone a facelift.
    [Show full text]
  • Final-Alberta-Loss-Factors-For-2009
    2009 Loss Factors TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 3 3.0 2009 LOSS FACTORS.............................................................................. 3 4.0 2009 AND 2008 LOSS FACTORS CALCULATION ................................. 6 5.0 2009 OVERALL LOSS FACTOR RESULTS ............................................ 8 6.0 LOSS FACTOR MAP ................................................................................ 9 7.0 CONCLUSION........................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX I. CASE COMPARISON .................................................................... 10 ii Alberta Electric System Operator 2009 Loss Factors 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this document is to present the 2009 loss factors complete with a brief explanation of changes. A loss factor map is included. The loss factors published in this document will be effective from January 01, 2009 to December 31, 2009. 2.0 Introduction The AESO has completed the final analysis of 2009 loss factors and the results are attached. The analysis includes the application of the 2009 Generic Stacking Order (GSO) results published earlier this summer and the 2009 Base Cases published in October on the AESO web site. Both the GSO and the Base Cases have been updated during the course of the final calculations and reposted. The requirements
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 County Map Book
    2018 - 2019 OWNERSHIP MAPBOOK PARKLAND COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP LEGEND Lake or River ´ Parkland County Lease County Day Use Park Provincial Highways ´´ ´´ ´´ ´ Paved Surface Highway Map Grid (Township) ´´´´´ County Land County Service ´´ ´´´ Y w Y ´ ´ Y Gravel Surface Highway ´´´ First Nations Reserve* Y Y Crown Land RCMP Station ´´´´ Y Yw County Roads City, Town or Village* Jx No Thru Traffic County Office O Paved Surface Road Hamlet '( Sewage Lagoon Fire Hall Gravel Surface Road Industrial Area !» Sewage Transfer Station Hospital Non-County Roads N Crown/Grazing Reserve or Natural Area Buck for Wildlife Area Cemetery NNNN NNN N N N N N NN TransAlta Corporation Waste Transfer Station Community Hall Paved Surface Road NNN N N N NNNN NNN N N N N N N N N N NN N N Tomahawk Cattle Ranch Ltd Swimming Pool Church Gravel Surface Road N N N NN N Railway Electoral Division Sports Park School Stream Campground *Excluded from County Jurisdiction Parkland County Land Ownership Mapbook - Produced using digital geographic data provided by Parkland County and ALTALIS. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS Copyright © 2018 by Parkland County, Parkland County, Alberta, Canada Not to be copied in whole or in part by any means without the expressed written permission of the copyright holder. R.08 R.07 R.06 R.05 R.04 R.03 R.02 R.01 R.27 R.26 R.25 T.56 T.55 T.55 Table of Contents E T.54 T.54 Page 13 Magnolia Fallis Wabamun Page T.53 T.53 Page 4 Entwistle Spruce Gainford Grove 1 #133B Page Page 10 Page#1 3 3B 7 WABAMUN Duffield Carvel LAKE Stony Acheson 14 Plain
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Market Share Offer Control Report
    2020 MARKET SHARE OFFER CONTROL REPORT MARKET SURVEILLANCE ADMINISTRATOR FEBRUARY 28, 2020 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Calculation of Offer Control ........................................................................................................ 3 Assessment of Offer Control ...................................................................................................... 4 Offer Control Changes made during 2019 .................................................................................. 8 Appendix A ...............................................................................................................................11 Market Share Offer Control by Electricity Market Participant .................................................11 Market Share Offer Control by Generating Unit .....................................................................17 2 Introduction This 2020 Market Share Offer Control Report (Report) has been prepared pursuant to subsection 5(3) of the Fair, Efficient adolmnd Open Competition Regulation (FEOC Regulation). Subsection 5(3) reads as follows: (3) The MSA shall at least annually make available to the public an offer control report that (a) shall include the names and the percentage of offer control held by electricity market participants, where the percentage of offer control is greater than 5%, and (b) may include the names and the percentage of offer control
    [Show full text]
  • Keephills 3 Update
    Building community connections August 2010 Kilowatt Connection. Aerial view of the construction progress of the Air Quality Control System at K3. Keephills 3 Update Traffic and Road Construction at Keephills 3 (K3) is approximately 90 per cent complete and the focus has now turned to Safety training and commissioning. Keephills 3 - Once complete, K3 will be one of Canada’s most Construction Traffic Schedule advanced coal-fired plants. As a pioneer facility in the The majority of the K3 construction traffic travels industry, new training methods must be developed to west to the site in the morning and travels east from ensure all employees can operate new technology and the site in the afternoon. Maximum traffic flows are equipment safely and effectively. 15 – 20 minutes in duration. The following outlines the peak flow traffic times. This information is The initial focus of training at K3 was safety, including provided so that residents may avoid use of the noted the specific training required for safe access to a highways at peak times (if possible) to reduce travel construction site. An example of one portion of this time delays due to traffic volume. We anticipate training is the Construction Safety Training System traffic volume to steadily decrease over the coming (CSTS) which is a computer-based course created by months as fewer workers are required onsite. the Alberta Construction Safety Association (ACSA) that provides instruction and examination on various Monday – Monday – Friday (p.m.) health and safety topics. materials, training modules and video footage Friday (a.m.) Thursday 3:25 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul and Mavis Kaufman October 29, 2020
    Unreserved Public Real Estate Auction Paul and Mavis Kaufman Will be sold to the highest bidder 3 Parcels of Real Estate – 480± Title Acres October 29, 2020 3912± Sq Ft Home – 28 Ft x 50 Ft Shop – Clyde, AB Edmonton Auction Site AB/Westlock County Parcel 1 – SW 22-60-25-W4 – 160± Title Acres – Home Quarter ▸ 1985 built, 3912± sq ft two-storey home, attached double garage, (7) bedrooms, (two master bedrooms with ensuites), (4) bathrooms, (2) kitchens, residential elevator, 28 ft x 50 ft shop with 12 ft W x 14 ft H overhead door, 20 ft x 30 ft detached garage, 40 ft x 40 ft barn, 22 ft x 20 ft calving shed, 25 ft x 95 ft pole shed, livestock corrals, power, natural gas, (2) water wells, septic field system, 125± ac cult, canola 2020, balance bush and lowland, taxes $3914.99. Home Yard site ▸ Built 1985 ▸ 3912± sq ft, two-storey ▸ (7) bedrooms, (4) bathrooms ▸ Attached double garage ▸ 12-inch exterior walls (staggered double 2 x 6 construction) ▸ Raised roof trusses (R60 attic insulation with R40 at the outside) ▸ Stucco exterior, asphalt shingles (new 2017) ▸ First and second floor decks ▸ Ground floor, self-contained in-law suite ▸ Residential elevator ▸ Hot water radiant heat - (2) boilers ▸ Laminate hardwood, tile, linoleum and carpet 3912± sq ft two-storey home First Floor ▸ Entry, mudroom and laundry Open House Dates: - Washer and dryer October 4 and 18 – 2 to 4 pm ▸ Kitchen - Oak cabinets For more information: - Laminate hardwood Paul or Mavis Kaufman – Contact - Skylight 780.348.5671 - Fridge, Stove, Dishwasher Jerry Hodge – Ritchie Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend - AUPE Area Councils Whiskey Gap Del Bonita Coutts
    Indian Cabins Steen River Peace Point Meander River 35 Carlson Landing Sweet Grass Landing Habay Fort Chipewyan 58 Quatre Fourches High Level Rocky Lane Rainbow Lake Fox Lake Embarras Portage #1 North Vermilion Settlemen Little Red River Jackfish Fort Vermilion Vermilion Chutes Fitzgerald Embarras Paddle Prairie Hay Camp Carcajou Bitumount 35 Garden Creek Little Fishery Fort Mackay Fifth Meridian Hotchkiss Mildred Lake Notikewin Chipewyan Lake Manning North Star Chipewyan Lake Deadwood Fort McMurray Peerless Lake #16 Clear Prairie Dixonville Loon Lake Red Earth Creek Trout Lake #2 Anzac Royce Hines Creek Peace River Cherry Point Grimshaw Gage 2 58 Brownvale Harmon Valley Highland Park 49 Reno Blueberry Mountain Springburn Atikameg Wabasca-desmarais Bonanza Fairview Jean Cote Gordondale Gift Lake Bay Tree #3 Tangent Rycroft Wanham Eaglesham Girouxville Spirit River Mclennan Prestville Watino Donnelly Silverwood Conklin Kathleen Woking Guy Kenzie Demmitt Valhalla Centre Webster 2A Triangle High Prairie #4 63 Canyon Creek 2 La Glace Sexsmith Enilda Joussard Lymburn Hythe 2 Faust Albright Clairmont 49 Slave Lake #7 Calling Lake Beaverlodge 43 Saulteaux Spurfield Wandering River Bezanson Debolt Wembley Crooked Creek Sunset House 2 Smith Breynat Hondo Amesbury Elmworth Grande Calais Ranch 33 Prairie Valleyview #5 Chisholm 2 #10 #11 Grassland Plamondon 43 Athabasca Atmore 55 #6 Little Smoky Lac La Biche Swan Hills Flatbush Hylo #12 Colinton Boyle Fawcett Meanook Cold Rich Lake Regional Ofces Jarvie Perryvale 33 2 36 Lake Fox Creek 32 Grand Centre Rochester 63 Fort Assiniboine Dapp Peace River Two Creeks Tawatinaw St. Lina Ardmore #9 Pibroch Nestow Abee Mallaig Glendon Windfall Tiger Lily Thorhild Whitecourt #8 Clyde Spedden Grande Prairie Westlock Waskatenau Bellis Vilna Bonnyville #13 Barrhead Ashmont St.
    [Show full text]