DOCSLIB.ORG

How the Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act's Condom Mandate Hurts Performers & Violates the First Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How the Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act's Condom Mandate Hurts Performers & Violates the First Amendment Health Matrix: The Journal of Law- Medicine Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 13 2015 Unwrapped: How the Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act's Condom Mandate Hurts Performers & Violates the First Amendment Jason Shachner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Jason Shachner, Unwrapped: How the Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act's Condom Mandate Hurts Performers & Violates the First Amendment, 24 Health Matrix 345 (2014) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol24/iss1/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Health Matrix: The Journal of Law- Medicine by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Health Matrix·Volume 24·2014 Unwrapped: How the Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act’s Condom Mandate Hurts Performers & Violates the First Amendment Jason Shachner† Contents Introduction ................................................................................... 345 I. Background ................................................................................. 350 A. Structure of the Adult Film Industry in Southern California .............. 350 B. The Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation .......................... 352 C. The 2004 HIV Outbreak and AIM’s Response .................................. 354 D. The Fall of AIM and the Rise of Measure B .................................... 356 II. County of Los Angeles Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act .......................................................................... 359 III. Why Does Measure B Violate the First Amendment? ............ 360 A. A Primer on the First Amendment ................................................. 360 B. Measure B is Not a Content-Based Restriction on Free Speech, and the Supreme Court Would Not Subject It to Strict Scrutiny ...... 362 C. Measure B Should Not Survive Intermediate Scrutiny ....................... 364 1. Measure B Serves a Substantial Government Interest ................... 365 2. Measure B Does Not Advance the Government’s Interest ............ 365 IV. The Performer Availability Screening Services as Regulator of the Adult Film Industry ................................ 371 Conclusion ...................................................................................... 375 Introduction The consistent and correct use of male latex condoms is one of the most effective methods of reducing the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmis- sion.1 In the U.S., only two of one hundred condoms break when used † J.D. candidate, 2014, Case Western Reserve University School of Law; B.S., 2009, Florida State University. Many thanks to: Professor Sharona Hoffman for her guidance and feedback; Professor B. Jessie Hill for her assistance; Michelle Murray for listening to me talk endlessly about this topic; and the Health Matrix staff. 1. CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, CONDOM FACT SHEET IN BRIEF 1 (2012), available at 345 Health Matrix·Volume 24·2014 Unwrapped: Adult Film Industry Condom Mandate & the First Amendment correctly.2 Condom use is clearly the most effective and prudent method of preventing the spread of STIs and HIV. Then why is the adult film industry (AFI) fighting the Los Angeles Safe Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act (Measure B) that requires performers to use “condoms during any acts of vaginal or anal sexual intercourse?”3 There are two reasons: the condom mandate is damaging to performer health and the mandate infringes on adult film producers’ (producers) First Amendment rights. Sex in adult films is dramatically different from sex in the average American bedroom. The average American will likely never experience the sexual practices that are commonly performed in adult films. A content analysis of fifty randomly selected heterosexual adult films found that 42% of the scenes involved anal intercourse, 94% involved oral- genital or oral-anal contact, and 22% involved anal-to-oral penile insertion.4 The duration of sexual intercourse required to produce even the shortest adult film scene, as one performer characterized it, is a minimum of “half an hour of hard thrusting by a well-endowed man.”5 This thirty-minute minimum is significantly longer than what sex therapists described as “too long” for comfort.6 The average size of a male performer’s erect penis is eight inches, whereas the average Ameri- can woman is likely to encounter a man whose erect penis is less than six inches.7 Such difference in sexual activity led one performer to describe sex in the adult film industry (AFI) as follows, “This is not making love . It’s athletic. It’s sweaty. It’s done for the camera.”8 Condoms, coupled with the sexual acrobatics the AFI requires, cre- ate unique problems that the average sexually active American is http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/docs/CondomFactsheetInBrief. pdf. 2. CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT: 1998 GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES 4 (Jan. 23, 1998), available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr4701.pdf. 3. L.A. CNTY., CAL. CODE tit. 11, ch. 39, § 110(A) (2013). 4. Corita R. Grudzen et al., Condom Use and High-Risk Sexual Acts in Adult Films: A Comparison of Heterosexual and Homosexual Films, 99 AM. J. PUB. HEALTH S152, S154 (2009). 5. Hugo Schwyzer, Why Porn Sex Is the Safest Sex, JEZEBEL (Oct. 5, 2012, 3:40 PM), http://jezebel.com/5948719/why-porn-sex-is-the-safest-sex. 6. Eric W. Corty & Jenay M. Guardiani, Canadian and American Sex Therapists’ Perceptions of Normal and Abnormal Ejaculatory Latencies: How Long Should Intercourse Last?, 5 J. SEXUAL MED. 1251, 1254 (2008). 7. Sexy Little Numbers, MEN’S HEALTH, Mar. 2004, at 168. 8. Jim Newton, Porn, Safe Sex and Measure B, L.A. TIMES (Oct. 1, 2012), http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-newton- condoms-porn-20121001,0,7973598.column. 346 Health Matrix·Volume 24·2014 Unwrapped: Adult Film Industry Condom Mandate & the First Amendment unlikely to encounter. For men, condoms make the performance of their job more difficult.9 For women, condoms not only make the job more difficult but also increase the risk of injury.10 At the beginning of her career, one performer insisted on requiring her co-performers to wear a condom.11 After performing only one scene she “was so abraded and uncomfortable by the condom that she feared she could not return for her second, which she was under contract to perform.”12 Other female performers echo this aversion to condom use during scenes. One per- former observed that, “Some people are allergic to condoms . One time I swelled up like a balloon and couldn’t work because of whatever was on the condom.”13 Nina Hartley, a former nurse and a performer in adult films since 1984, stated: The average length of intercourse for most Americans is 10 minutes. [In my work the average length is] 30 to 60 minutes . it’s uncomfortable . it’s a friction burn, and it opens up lesions in the genital mucosa. I could handle two to three condom scenes a month. But [performers] are paid by the scene, and I couldn’t do three in a week.14 The risk of injury is even higher when a female performs an anal sex scene. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, condoms are not only more likely to break during anal intercourse, but anal intercourse with condoms can “cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. These tears allow disease germs to pass more easily from one partner to the other.”15 Female performers recognize this risk, and one female performer stated: “When you’ve got a condom on a big guy who’s working with a [small woman] and you have to do anal, you run the risk of tearing. If it’s me in an anal scene, I prefer no condom because I don’t want to get hurt.”16 9. Chauntelle Anne Tibbals, “[A]nything that Forces Itself into My Vagina Is by Definition Raping Me . .” – Adult Film Performers and Occupational Safety and Health, 23 STAN. L. & POL’Y REV. 231, 248 (2012). 10. Id. at 248-49. 11. Newton, supra note 8. 12. Id. 13. Tibbals, supra note 9, at 243. 14. Donald G. McNeil Jr., Unlikely Model in HIV Efforts: Sex Film Industry, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 5 2012), http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/06/health/unlikely-model-for-hiv- prevention-porn-industry.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. 15. Condoms and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Brochure, FOOD AND DRUG ADM’N (Dec. 1990), http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/byAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/HI VandAIDSActivities/ucm126372.htm#strong. 16. Tibbals, supra note 9, at 243. 347 Health Matrix·Volume 24·2014 Unwrapped: Adult Film Industry Condom Mandate & the First Amendment Measure B is reasonable when viewed in the context of average, eve- ryday sexual activity. A survey of Canadian and American sex therapists found that the desirable duration of intercourse is approximately eight minutes, with twenty minutes considered “too long.”17 A woman is more likely to experience vaginal intercourse (89.2%) than anal intercourse (21.2%) in her lifetime. 18 Certainly, the average sexually active Ameri- can would not consider condoms anything more than a slight annoyance. However, the sexual activity of a performer is anything but average. Failure to use a condom during intercourse
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criminalizing "Virtual" Child Pornography Under the Child Pornography Prevention Act: Is It Really What It "Appears to Be?" Wade T
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 2 Article 6 2001 Criminalizing "Virtual" Child Pornography Under the Child Pornography Prevention Act: Is it Really What it "Appears to Be?" Wade T. Anderson University of Richmond Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Wade T. Anderson, Criminalizing "Virtual" Child Pornography Under the Child Pornography Prevention Act: Is it Really What it "Appears to Be?", 35 U. Rich. L. Rev. 393 (2001). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol35/iss2/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS CRIMINALIZING "VIRTUAL" CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UNDER THE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT: IS IT REALLY WHAT IT "APPEARS TO BE?" David is 11 years old. He weighs 60 pounds. He is 4 feet, 6 inches tall. He has brown hair. His love is real. But he is not. -Advertisement for Steven Spielberg's June 2001 film, Artificial Intelligence.' Years after his death, John Wayne sells beer in television commercials. 2 Eons after their extinction, lifelike dinosaurs con- tinue to terrorize actors and thrill moviegoers.3 The highest- grossing film of all time4 employs "virtual" passengers aboard the 1. AL. Artificial Intelligence, at http:/aimovie.warnerbros.com (last visited Apr. 3, 2001). 2. Robert Lemos, Virtual Actors: Cheaper, Better, Faster Than Humans?, ZDNET NEWS, June 15, available at 1998, 1998 WL 28812578 ("John Wayne and Fred Astaire, or at least the computer-enhanced images of the deceased stars, are starring in commer- cials.").
    [Show full text]
  • Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory 97 Anu Koivunen Sound and Feminist Modernity in Black Women’S Film Narratives 111 Geetha Ramanathan
    European Film Studies Mutations and Appropriations in THE KEY DEBATES FEMINISMS Laura Mulvey and 5 Anna Backman Rogers (eds.) Amsterdam University Press Feminisms The Key Debates Mutations and Appropriations in European Film Studies Series Editors Ian Christie, Dominique Chateau, Annie van den Oever Feminisms Diversity, Difference, and Multiplicity in Contemporary Film Cultures Edited by Laura Mulvey and Anna Backman Rogers Amsterdam University Press The publication of this book is made possible by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Cover design: Neon, design and communications | Sabine Mannel Lay-out: japes, Amsterdam Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 90 8964 676 7 e-isbn 978 90 4852 363 4 doi 10.5117/9789089646767 nur 670 © L. Mulvey, A. Backman Rogers / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2015 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Contents Editorial 9 Preface 10 Acknowledgments 15 Introduction: 1970s Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object 17 Laura Mulvey PART I New Perspectives: Images and the Female Body Disconnected Heroines, Icy Intelligence: Reframing Feminism(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary Unprotected: Condoms, Bareback Porn, and the First Amendment
    Commentary Unprotected: Condoms, Bareback Porn, and the First Amendment Bailey J. Langnert ABSTRACT In November 2012, Los Angeles County voters passed Measure B, or the Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act. Measure B mandated condom use by all porn performers in adult films produced within county borders and created a complex regulatory process for adult film producers that included permitting, mandatory public health trainings, and warrantless administrative searches. Shortly after its passage, Vivid Entertainment filed a lawsuit to enjoin the enforcement of Measure B, arguing that the Measure violated their First Amendment right to portray condomless sex in porn. In December 2014, the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court's decision upholding the constitutionality of Measure B. Notably, the mainstream discourse surrounding the Measure B campaign, as well as the legal arguments put forth in the lawsuit, focused exclusively on straight pornography while purporting to represent all porn. As a result, an entire genre of condomless pornography went unrepresented in the discussion: bareback porn, which portrays intentional unprotected anal sex between men. Excluding bareback porn from the lawsuit represented a missed opportunityfor Vivid in its challenge of Measure B. There are several political messages underlying bareback porn unique to that genre that might have resulted in the t The author received a law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall) in 2015. As a law student, the author worked as a Teaching Assistant in the First Year Legal Writing Program and served as a Senior Board Member of the Boalt Hall Women's Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Games+Production.Pdf
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Banks, John& Cunningham, Stuart (2016) Games production in Australia: Adapting to precariousness. In Curtin, M & Sanson, K (Eds.) Precarious creativity: Global media, local labor. University of California Press, United States of America, pp. 186-199. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/87501/ c c 2016 by The Regents of the University of California This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY license. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses. License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. http:// www.ucpress.edu/ book.php?isbn=9780520290853 CURTIN & SANSON | PRECARIOUS CREATIVITY Luminos is the open access monograph publishing program from UC Press. Luminos provides a framework for preserving and rein- vigorating monograph publishing for the future and increases the reach and visibility of important scholarly work. Titles published in the UC Press Luminos model are published with the same high standards for selection, peer review, production, and marketing as those in our traditional program. www.luminosoa.org Precarious Creativity Precarious Creativity Global Media, Local Labor Edited by Michael Curtin and Kevin Sanson UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advanc- ing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol XLV Issue 5
    page 2 the paper december 9, 2015 SStoya,toya, ppg.g. 3 RResolutions,esolutions, ppg.g. 9 GGrimes,rimes, ppg.g. 1155 CCelebrityelebrity SSanta,anta, ppg.g. 2211 AAdele,dele, ppg.g. 2233 the paper “Which Crayon Are You?” c/o Offi ce of Student Leadership Editors-in-Chief and Community Development Ali “Tickle Me Pink” Glembocki Fordham University Zoe “Laser Lemon” Sakas Bronx, NY 10458 [email protected] News Editors www.fupaper.org // @fupaper Caitlin “Razzmatazz” Hufnagle Siobhan “Thistle” Donahue the paper is Fordham’s journal of news, analysis, comment and review. Students from all years and disciplines get together biweekly to produce a printed version of the paper using Opinions Editors Adobe InDesign and publish an online version using Wordpress. Photos are “borrowed” from Elena “Manatee” Meuse Internet sites and edited in Photoshop. Open meetings are held Tuesdays at 9:00 PM in McGin- John “Timberwolf” Looby ley 2nd. Articles can be submitted via e-mail to [email protected]. Submissions from all students are always considered and usually published. Our staff is more than willing to help Arts Editors new writers develop their own unique voices and fi gure out how to most effectively convey their Kelly “Forest Green” Tyra thoughts and ideas. We do not assign topics to our writers either. The process is as follows: Melody “Black” Knight-Brown have an idea for an article, send us an email or come to our meetings to pitch your idea, write the article, work on edits with us, and then get published! We are happy to work with anyone Earwax Editor who is interested, so if you have any questions, comments or concerns please shoot us an Arthur “Fuzzy Wuzzy” Banach email or come to our next meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity
    Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity By Phillip Samuels © 2019 M.A., University of Kansas, 2007 B.A., Emporia State University, 2004 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Dorothy Pennington Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Jeffery Jarman Dr. Randal Maurice Jelks _____________________________ Dr. Robert McDonald Date Defended: 6 December 2019 ii Acceptance Page Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity The dissertation committee for Phillip Samuels certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Chair: Dr. Dorthy Pennington Date Approved: iii Abstract Mandingo is a reference to a longstanding myth in American culture, that black men have an unquenchable desire for white woman. I will argue that Mandingo is an example of a racial archetype. Racial archetypes are specific images of a long-standing stereotypes. Mandingo is one such archetype. Mandingo conjures up an entire history of the rhetoric of miscegenation. For some it is the excitement of the big black cock (BBC) and crossing the color line, but for most blacks it invokes images of lynching, slavery, and police brutality brought on by the fear of black men while at the same time trafficking in a prurient landscape of American racial and sexual relations. Whether through words, pictures or movies, the Mandingo has become a dominant archetype in the pantheon of the African American experience. Charting the Mandingo emergence and articulation is critical project to discern how these rhetorical markers are part of a larger mythic narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of Florida Miami Division
    Case 1:15-cv-23888-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION HUSHHUSH ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California ) corporation d/b/a Hush Hush Entertainment, Hushpass.com ) and Interracialpass.com, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) MINDGEEK USA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) d/b/a PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM MINDGEEK USA, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, individually and doing ) business as MINDGEEK USA INC., a Delaware ) corporation, individually and d/b/a ) PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; MG FREESITES, LTD, ) a Delaware corporation, individually and d/b/a ) PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; MG BILLING US, a ) Delaware corporation, individually and d/b/a ) PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; MG BILLING EU, ) a Delaware corporation, individually and d/b/a ) PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; MG BILLING IRELAND, ) a Delaware corporation, individually and d/b/a ) PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; LICENSING IP ) INTERNATIONAL S.A.R.L , a foreign corporation ) [DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL] d/b/a PORNHUBPREMIUM.COM; FERAS ANTOON, ) an individual; and DOES 1- 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________________) COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, DAMAGES, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Plaintiff HUSHHUSH ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California corporation d/b/a Hush Hush Entertainment, Hushpass.com and Interracialpass.com, by and through its attorneys of record, hereby allege as follows: 1 Case 1:15-cv-23888-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2015 Page 2 of 25 NATURE OF THE CASE 1. This is an action for violation of Plaintiff, HUSHHUSH ENTERTAINMENT’S intellectual property rights. HUSHHUSH ENTERTAINMENT owns certain adult entertainment content which has been properly registered with the United States Copyright Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenge Porn and Freedom of Expression: Legislative Pushback to an Online Weapon of Emotional and Reputational Destruction
    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 24 Volume XXIV Number 3 Volume XXIV Book 3 Article 2 2014 Revenge Porn and Freedom of Expression: Legislative Pushback to an Online Weapon of Emotional and Reputational Destruction Clay Calvert University of Florida, Gainesville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Clay Calvert, Revenge Porn and Freedom of Expression: Legislative Pushback to an Online Weapon of Emotional and Reputational Destruction, 24 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 673 (2015). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol24/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Revenge Porn and Freedom of Expression: Legislative Pushback to an Online Weapon of Emotional and Reputational Destruction Cover Page Footnote Professor & Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication and Director of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla. B.A., 1987, Communication, Stanford University; J.D. (Order of the Coif), 1991, McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific; Ph.D., 1996, Communication, Stanford University. Member, State Bar of California. The author thanks Joanna Bomfim, Emma Morehart, Sarah Papadelias and Linda Riedemann of the University of Florida for their excellent help with this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition: How Can Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned Under the First Amendment?
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 31 Issue 3 Article 5 4-20-2004 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition: How Can Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned Under the First Amendment? Virginia F. Milstead Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Virginia F. Milstead Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition: How Can Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned Under the First Amendment?, 31 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 3 (2004) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol31/iss3/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition: How Can Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned Under the First Amendment? TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND: OBSCENITY AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY A. Roth v. United States B. Miller v. California C. New York v. Ferber D. Osborne v. Ohio E. Background to the CPPA II. ASHCROFT V. FREE SPEECH COALITION: THE COURT CONSIDERS A FIRST AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO THE CPPA. A. Majority Opinion B. Justice Thomas's Concurrence C. Justice O'Connor'sConcurrence and Dissent in Part D. Chief Justice Rehnquist's Dissent E. The Reasoning of the Justices: Considerationsand Critique I. The Seduction of Children 2. Whets the Appetites of Pedophiles 3. Need to Eliminate the Market for Real Pornography 4. Hinders Prosecution 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Vom Revolutionären Akt Zum Milliardengeschäft: CASH Zeigt, Wie Sich Das Pornogeschäft Der USA In
    PORNO BUSINESS Am Anfang war das Feuer Vom revolutionären Akt zum Milliardengeschäft: CASH zeigt, wie sich das Pornogeschäft der USA in Nina Hartley, Pornostar und Herausgeberin von Liebesanleitungs- Sharon Mitchell, Ex-Pornodarstellerin und Leiterin der Aim-Klinik: Jane Hamilton, Ex-Pornostar und Regisseurin: «Mit Erotik Videos: «Heute geht es im Business nur noch um Geld, aufklärerische «In diesem Geschäft sind die Frauen die Ware schlechthin. haben heute die wenigsten Filme etwas zu tun. Heute werden keine Botschaften haben keinen Platz. Das ist traurig. Wenn man einen Sie haben mehr Macht, als sie denken. Die Frauen könnten sich Geschichten mehr erzählt. Es geht nur noch von Sexszene zu Sex- schlechten Job hat, kann guter Sex darüber hinwegtrösten. Was aber, viel mehr Macht sichern, wenn sie nur wollten und es richtig an- szene, und was gezeigt wird, hat mehr mit Zirkusakrobatik zu tun als wenn Sex der schlechte Job ist, womit kann man sich dann trösten?» stellen.» mit Liebe.» schichte der Erwachsenenunterhal- te ist es gleich umgekehrt.» Damals tiven und sorgte für einen wahren beschnitten die VHS-Macher die tung, kam er doch 1972 erstmals in gab es auch noch etwas zu sagen. Porno-Boom. Nun konnten alle ei- Nutzungsrechte nicht. In den öffentliche US-Kinos. Zuvor spielte «Die Botschaft, die wir vermitteln nen anrüchigen Streifen drehen, frühen Achtzigerjahren entfielen sich alles hinter verschlossenen wollten, war: Sex ist gut für Frauen ohne dass teures Filmmaterial be- 75 Prozent des Video-Mietumsatzes Türen oder unter der Bezeichnung und Männer», erklärt Nina Hartley nutzt und von Fremden in einem in den USA auf Erotik-Kassetten.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Manufacturing Sex: Careers and Culture in Pornography Production Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11z2w98c Author Schieber, David William Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Manufacturing Sex: Careers and Culture in Pornography Production A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by David William Schieber 2019 © Copyright by David William Schieber 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Manufacturing Sex: Careers and Culture in Pornography Production by David William Schieber Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Gabriel Rossman, Co-chair Professor Abigail Saguy, Co-chair This Dissertation examines the career experiences and institutional decision- making processes of performers in the California adult film industry. Specifically, it explores how performers navigate a field typified by contingent, stigmatized work at the intersection of culture, health, gender, sexuality. Drawing on qualitative interviews with stakeholders in the California adult film industry, as well as an original quantitative dataset detailing the performance histories of adult performers, I develop three substantive chapters exploring different aspects of the adult film industry and how they advance theoretical areas in sociology. Chapter Two of the dissertation uses a unique quantitative dataset I constructed by scraping the performance histories and demographic information of over 140,000 adult film performers and directors and their roles in over ii 180,000 adult films, allowing me to examine differences in career length and trajectory between performers by sexuality and gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Porn Culture Feminist Positions and Oppositions in the Internet Pornosphere Allegra W
    from Paul G. Nixon and Isabel K. Düsterhöft (Eds.) Sex in the Digital Age. New York: Rougledge, 2018. CHAPTER 2 Participatory porn culture Feminist positions and oppositions in the internet pornosphere Allegra W. Smith Introductions: pornography, feminisms, and ongoing debate Though first-wave feminists had engaged in debate and advocacy surrounding sexual knowledge and obscenity since the late-19th century (Horowitz, 2003), American advocates did not begin to address pornography as a feminist concern until the 1970s, ostensibly beginning with the formation of the activist group Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media (WAVPM) in 1978. WAVPM was a reactionary response to the mainstreaming of hardcore pornography in the wake of American sexual liberation, which many second wave feminists claimed “…encouraged rape and other acts of violence, threatening women’s safety and establishing a climate of terror that silenced women and perpetuated their oppression… [thus helping] create and maintain women’s subordinate status” (Bronstein, 2011, pp. 178–179). The resulting “porn wars” (or, more broadly, “sex wars”) of the 1980s and 1990s polarized second- and third-wave feminists into two camps: (1) anti-porn feminists, such as writer Andrea Dworkin (1981) and legal scholar Catharine MacKinnon (1984), who opposed the creation and distribution of pornographic images and videos on moral and political grounds; and (2) pro-porn or sex-positive feminists, such as anthropologist Gayle Rubin and feminist pornographer Candida Royalle, who advocated for freedom of sexual expression and representation. The rhetoric surrounding the social and cultural ills perpetuated by pornography was duly acrimonious, with one prominent feminist writing, “pornography is the theory, rape is the practice” (Morgan, 1978, p.
    [Show full text]