DOCSLIB.ORG

THE AGILE FROG Species Action Plan Rana Dalmatina SUMMARSUMMARSUMMARYYY DOCUMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE AGILE FROG Species Action Plan Rana Dalmatina SUMMARSUMMARSUMMARYYY DOCUMENT THE AGILE FROG Species Action Plan Rana dalmatina SUMMARSUMMARSUMMARYYY DOCUMENT The agile frog Rana dalmatina is Despite the efforts of these distributed widely throughout much of organisations, the future of Jersey’s southern and central Europe, but is agile frog is still far from secure. The found in only a few northern locations factors which probably played a key including Jersey - the frog is not found role in the frogs decline are still very anywhere else in the British Isles. The much in evidence: Jersey population of the agile frog has been declining in both range and •water quality and quantity, as a result SSSpppecial pointsss ofofof numbers since the early 1900’s. In the of intensive agriculture, are still below inininteresteresteresttt::: 1970’s only seven localities were listed EU standards in many areas; The agile frog is protected where the frog could still be found, and •the continuing alteration, disturbance, under schedule 1 of the by the mid 1980’s this had fallen to and loss of potentially suitable Conservation of Wildlife only two sites. In 1987 one of the amphibian habitat; (Jersey) Law 2000. remaining two populations was lost as a •the growing numbers of predatory result of a lethal spill of agricultural ducks, cats, and feral ferrets. DESCRIPTION pesticide into the breeding pond. The The agile frog Rana dalmatina species is now believed to be confined These and other factors have combined is a European brown frog, to a single vulnerable population in the to reduce the frog population to the growing up to 90 mm (snout south-west of the island. to vent). The hind limbs are critical state at which it exists today. long (the heel extends beyond The Agile Frog Group (AFG) was the snout tip in adults). The In the face of intensifying threats, the snout is rather pointed, the ear formed in 1993, when the catastrophic need for a concerted, co-ordinated drum large and close to the decline of the frog came to light. Its conservation effort has become acute. eye. members include staff from the This need has prompted the production Environmental Services Unit of the of the Agile Frog, Species Action Plan. HABITAT States of Jersey Planning and This Action Plan documents the The agile frog’s European Environment Committee (ESU), the historical decline of the species; habitat comprises of Herpetology Department of the Durrell identifies the current major threats to its woodlands and wet meadows Wildlife Conservation Trust (Durrell survival; summarises the current action and, unlike the common frog Wildlife), the Zoology Section of the Rana temporaria, it is rarely being undertaken to conserve the Société Jersiaise, and other concerned found in fields or gardens. species and, most importantly, seeks to local naturalists. Through captive- define the action required in the future LOCAL DISTRIBUTION breeding, reintroduction of the frogs to to return the species to ‘Favourable The agile frog’s distribution in the wild and careful management of Conservation Status’ as defined Jersey has declined from their remaining habitat, the Group has overleaf. seven localities in the 1970’s been trying to stop the decline of agile to a single site in 2000. frog numbers. Conservation efforts have tried to increase this distribution to a further two sites in the island. Page 1 Species Action Plan AAACCCTTTIIION PLON PLAN OAN OBBBJECTIJECTIJECTIVVVESESES CURRENT STTTAAATTTUSUSUS ANANANDDD TTTAAARRRGGGETETETSSS The overall aim of the Action Plan is to provide a In the wild - The agile frog in Jersey is now confined to framework of achievable, practical objectives which, only a single site, L’Ouaisné Common. In less than 30 when implemented, will restore the agile frog to years their distribution has declined from seven sites in Favourable Conservation Status as defined in the the west of the island to this single location. Work has European Union Habitats and Species Directive (1992), started on introducing/reintroducing the frog to other by the year 2005. sites in the wild, but it is still too early to judge whether this will be successful. In ‘captivity’ - The primary aim of the captive Favourable Conservation Status’ exists when: Data on populations is to maintain a self-sustaining ‘safety net’ the population dynamics of a species indicate that it is in the event of the extinction of the species from the maintaining itself on a long term basis as a viable wild. Their secondary purpose is to generate surplus component of its natural habitats, and the natural range tadpoles and frogs for reintroduction into existing, and of the species is not being reduced, and is not likely to be reduced for the foreseeable future, and there is, and potential, new sites. To this end, there are 6 captive/ will probably continue to be, a sufficiently large semi-captive populations in outdoor enclosures around habitat to maintain its population on a long term basis. the island, with an estimated total population of 50 adult animals. Action Plan Objectives CURRENT FACTORS 1. To ensure that there is protection of, and a conservation CAUSING LOSS OR DECLINE management programme for, all existing natural sites, introduction sites or re-introduction sites. Habitat loss/fragmentation - through development for TARGET: To achieve site protection for all sites housing etc. small-scale by 2002. turnover of semi-natural 2. To increase the number of habitats to agricultural land. populations and widen the Water quality - Pollution of animal’s distribution through groundwater from agricultural introductions/re-introductions. chemicals and domestic TARGET: Maintain waste. a sustainable, Pollution events - In 2000 breeding population alone the Water Resources at two new sites Unit of the States of Jersey (Noirmont and one other to be identified) responded to over 167 by 2005. incidents of pollution. 3. To maintain a viable captive population of frogs with a Water shortages - The loss of ephemeral ponds as a minimum of 20 adult animals at a minimum of three locations result of a lowering of the water table, through (a minimum of 60 adults in total), abstraction for domestic and agricultural use. TARGET: Continue captive-breeding programme Predation pressures - Frog spawn is eaten by ducks and at least until objectives 1&2 (above) are satisfied. palmate newts. Adult frogs are eaten by birds, cats and feral-ferrets. 4 To further investigate the threats to, and applied ecology of Introduced exotics - Common frogs Rana temporaria this species in Jersey. and mainland European green frogs Rana lessonae/ TARGET: Maintain funding for PhD study on the esculenta, are already becoming established in Jersey agile frog in Jersey until 2003. and will compete with, and predate on, agile frogs. 5. To raise the profile and level of awareness, of the agile Small population effects - due to the current population frog’s plight in Jersey. ‘bottleneck’, future generations of frogs may become TARGET: Raise funds and embark on an active exposed to so-called ‘genetic risk factors’, such as publicity campaign in early 2001. inbreeding depression. The recovery programme has developed steadily over The action required to achieve these targets/objectives is out­ the past decade, and now incorporates a lined on page 4. Page 2 Species Action Plan CURRENT ACTION of the life-cycle, it is intended to Legal protection Site safeguards increase recruitment to the wild • The agile frog is now protected under population. ‘Stop feeding the ducks’ schedule 1 of the Conservation of campaign to make people Wildlife (Jersey) Law 2000. The law aware of the negative affect Protection of wild spawn - Wild spawn feral ducks have on local protects the adult frog, tadpoles and is, in the main, kept in situ, but native wildlife. spawn from any interference. The law protected from newt and duck predation • Investigate the potential to also forbids the release of non-native using plastic mesh baskets or willow locate duck deterrents at, species in the Island. This law requires “corrals”. ‘at risk’ sites. proper enforcement, and its existence should be publicised further. Monitoring of wild and release sites ­ The amount of spawn is monitored number of facets. annually, and night sorties made to sites during the breeding season in an attempt Captive/semi-captive breeding - to count reproductively active adults. Captive breeding takes place at a number of outdoor compounds around Monitoring of water quality – This has • the island, with the intention of provided clear evidence of the A campaign to make people maintaining a self sustaining captive potentially harmful levels of certain aware of the dangers of pet and feral cats, and to work ‘safety net’ and to generate surplus chemicals that are appearing in Jersey’s with local groups who care tadpoles and frogs for reintroduction. water bodies. for and seek to sterilise the local feral cat population. Creation of a new ‘wild’ site – For the Habitat protection – Seek to facilitate • Noirmont pond is the most past 4 years, captive bred tadpoles and urgent designation of SSI status to important site for a frogs have been released into a new, important conservation areas, and to reintroduction programme. encourage other designations to protect The water quality needs to small, isolated sites, by lobbying the be monitored, and the Planning and Environment Committee. group should seek to work with Public Services Habitat Management – Techniques such Department and as the coppicing of willow and the Agriculture and Fisheries department, who presently deepening and enlargement of dune administer the land, to slacks at L’Ouaisne have aimed to ensure that the surrounding provide more suitable conditions for the land does not return to survival of the agile frog at this site. agricultural use. Management plans for both L’Ouaisne • Signs and where necessary and Les Landes are presently being fences and gates to protect drafted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Breeding Activity of the Agile Frog Rana Dalmatina in a Rural Area M
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 41.2 (2018) 405 Breeding activity of the agile frog Rana dalmatina in a rural area M. Biaggini, I. Campetti, C. Corti Biaggini, M., Campetti, I., Corti, C., 2018. Breeding activity of the agile frog Rana dalmatina in a rural area. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 41.2: 405–413, Doi: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2018.41.0405 Abstract Breeding activity of the agile frog Rana dalmatina in a rural area. Rural landscapes can host many protected species that are constantly threatened by agriculture intensification and abandonment of traditional manage- ments. Amphibians are severely affected by both processes due to loss and alteration of aquatic and terrestrial habitats. We monitored the breeding activity of Rana dalmatina in a lowland rural area focusing on spawning sites in open habitats, namely ditches amid traditional arable lands and pastures with varying vegetation fea- tures, size, and distances from woodlots. Egg clump density and clump size differed between sites, probably depending on environmental and ecological factors (i.e., larval competition, food availability, and predation). The sites next to woodlots showed the highest clump density (up to 0.718 n/m2). Our observations indicate that the maintenance and correct management of water bodies connected to traditional rural activities can be key to amphibian conservation in agricultural areas. Key words: Agriculture, Amphibians, Breeding sites, Conservation, Rana dalmatina Resumen Actividad reproductiva de la rana ágil Rana dalmatina en una zona rural. Los territorios agrícolas pueden ser refugio de varias especies protegidas que, sin embargo, están constantemente amenazadas por la intensificación de la agricultura y el abandono de las prácticas tradicionales.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Section Introduction
    Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 RE-INTRODUCTION PRACTITIONERS DIRECTORY 1998 Compiled and Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae and Philip J. Seddon Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 © National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, 1998 Printing and Publication details Legal Deposit no. 2218/9 ISBN: 9960-614-08-5 Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 Copies of this directory are available from: The Secretary General National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development Post Box 61681, Riyadh 11575 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Phone: +966-1-441-8700 Fax: +966-1-441-0797 Bibliographic Citation: Soorae, P. S. and Seddon, P. J. (Eds). 1998. Re-introduction Practitioners Directory. Published jointly by the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Re-introduction Specialist Group, Nairobi, Kenya, and the National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 97pp. Cover Photo: Arabian Oryx Oryx leucoryx (NWRC Photo Library) Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 CONTENTS FOREWORD Professor Abdulaziz Abuzinadai PREFACE INTRODUCTION Dr Mark Stanley Price USING THE DIRECTORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PART A. ANIMALS I MOLLUSCS 1. GASTROPODS 1.1 Cittarium pica Top Shell 1.2 Placostylus ambagiosus Flax Snail 1.3 Placostylus ambagiosus Land Snail 1.4 Partula suturalis 1.5 Partula taeniata 1.6 Partula tahieana 1.7 Partula tohiveana 2. BIVALVES 2.1 Freshwater Mussels 2.2 Tridacna gigas Giant Clam II ARTHROPODS 3. ORTHOPTERA 3.1 Deinacrida sp. Weta 3.2 Deinacrida rugosa/parva Cook’s Strait Giant Weta Re-introduction Practitioners Directory - 1998 3.3 Gryllus campestris Field Cricket 4. LEPIDOPTERA 4.1 Carterocephalus palaemon Chequered Skipper 4.2 Lycaena dispar batavus Large Copper 4.3 Lycaena helle 4.4 Lycaeides melissa 4.5 Papilio aristodemus ponoceanus Schaus Swallowtail 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Evolution of the Vertebrate Primary Mouth
    Journal of Anatomy J. Anat. (2012) doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01540.x REVIEW Development and evolution of the vertebrate primary mouth Vladimı´r Soukup, Ivan Hora´ cek and Robert Cerny Department of Zoology, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Abstract The vertebrate oral region represents a key interface between outer and inner environments, and its structural and functional design is among the limiting factors for survival of its owners. Both formation of the respective oral opening (primary mouth) and establishment of the food-processing apparatus (secondary mouth) require interplay between several embryonic tissues and complex embryonic rearrangements. Although many aspects of the secondary mouth formation, including development of the jaws, teeth or taste buds, are known in con- siderable detail, general knowledge about primary mouth formation is regrettably low. In this paper, primary mouth formation is reviewed from a comparative point of view in order to reveal its underestimated morpho- genetic diversity among, and also within, particular vertebrate clades. In general, three main developmental modes were identified. The most common is characterized by primary mouth formation via a deeply invagi- nated ectodermal stomodeum and subsequent rupture of the bilaminar oral membrane. However, in salaman- der, lungfish and also in some frog species, the mouth develops alternatively via stomodeal collar formation contributed both by the ecto- and endoderm. In ray-finned fishes, on the other hand, the mouth forms via an ectoderm wedge and later horizontal detachment of the initially compressed oral epithelia with probably a mixed germ-layer derivation. A very intriguing situation can be seen in agnathan fishes: whereas lampreys develop their primary mouth in a manner similar to the most common gnathostome pattern, hagfishes seem to undergo a unique oropharyngeal morphogenesis when compared with other vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations Into the Life History Stages of the Common Frog (Rana Temporaria) Affected by an Amphibian Ranavirus in the United Kingdom
    260 AMPHIBIAN DISEASES Herpetological Review, 2013, 44(2), 260–263. © 2013 by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Investigations into the Life History Stages of the Common Frog (Rana temporaria) Affected by an Amphibian Ranavirus in the United Kingdom Ranaviruses are emerging infectious disease agents that af- owned land, so in order to maintain confidentiality we are un- fect a wide range of ectothermic and poikilothermic vertebrates: able to provide more detailed location information than is pro- fish, reptiles (including turtles and tortoises) and amphibians vided in Tables 1 and 2. (Ahne et al. 1997; Chinchar et al. 2009; Miller et al. 2011). In the Live tadpoles were transported in a common container in United Kingdom (UK), amphibian ranaviruses began to emerge pond water to the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of in the late 1980s and early 1990s in southeast England (Cunning- London, London, UK. Upon arrival, tadpoles were euthanized ham et al. 1996) and manifested as adult mass morbidity and using an overdose of MS-222 (1g/L tricaine methanesulphonate, mortality events (Cunningham et al. 1993; Cunningham et al. Thompson & Joseph Ltd., Norwich, UK) buffered to pH 7.0 with 1996; Drury et al. 1995). sodium bicarbonate. Tissue samples were then dissected out Evidence for local ranavirus outbreaks in the UK have, to and frozen at -80°C for ranavirus screening. In the case of larger date, relied exclusively upon reports of moribund or dead adult tadpoles, tissues included the right anterior quarter of the body, common frogs (e.g. Cunningham et al. 1993; Cunningham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Red-Legged Frog,Rana Aurora
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Northern Red-legged Frog Rana aurora in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2015 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2015. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Northern Red-legged Frog Rana aurora in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 69 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Red-legged Frog Rana aurora in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 46 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Waye, H. 1999. COSEWIC status report on the red-legged frog Rana aurora in Canada in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the red-legged frog Rana aurora in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-31 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Barbara Beasley for writing the status report on the Northern Red- legged Frog (Rana aurora) in Canada. This report was prepared under contract with Environment Canada and was overseen by Kristiina Ovaska, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Amphibian and Reptile Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Grenouille à pattes rouges du Nord (Rana aurora ) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranavirus Could Facilitate Local Extinction of Rare Amphibian Species
    Ranavirus could facilitate local extinction of rare amphibian species Julia E. Earl, Jordan C. Chaney, William B. Sutton, Carson E. Lillard, Andrew J. Kouba, Cecilia Langhorne, Jessi Krebs, et al. Oecologia ISSN 0029-8549 Volume 182 Number 2 Oecologia (2016) 182:611-623 DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3682-6 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Oecologia (2016) 182:611–623 DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3682-6 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY – ORIGINAL RESEARCH Ranavirus could facilitate local extinction of rare amphibian species Julia E. Earl1 · Jordan C. Chaney2 · William B. Sutton3 · Carson E. Lillard2 · Andrew J. Kouba4,8 · Cecilia Langhorne5 · Jessi Krebs6 · Rebecca P. Wilkes7 · Rachel D. Hill2 · Debra L. Miller2,7 · Matthew J. Gray2 Received: 30 September 2015 / Accepted: 14 June 2016 / Published online: 25 June 2016 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract There is growing evidence that pathogens play of six life stages tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for the Conservation of the Italian Agile Frog (Rana Latastei) in Europe
    Strasbourg, 26 October 2006 T-PVS/Inf (2006) 16 [Inf16e_2006.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 26th meeting Strasbourg, 27-30 November 2006 __________ Action Plan for the Conservation of the Italian Agile Frog (Rana latastei) in Europe Document prepared by Paul Edgar* and David R. Bird *c/o The Herpetological Conservation Trust, 655a Christchurch Road, Boscombe Bournemouth, Dorset, BH1 4AP, UK, E-mail: [email protected] This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2006) 16 - 2 - CONTENTS A. ITALIAN AGILE FROG - SPECIES ACTION PLAN SUMMARY........................................................3 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................3 2. Rationale............................................................................................................................................3 3. Objectives ..........................................................................................................................................3 4. Recommended Actions....................................................................................................................4 Table 1: Urgent Priority Actions for the Italian Agile Frog Rana latastei ................................................4 B. ITALIAN AGILE FROG – SPECIES
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Identification
    Amphibian Identification Common frog Adults 6-7 cm. Smooth skin, which appears moist. Coloration variable, includes brown, yellow and orange. Some females have red markings on lower body. Usually has a dark ‘mask’ marking behind the eye. Breeding male Markings also variable, Grey/pale blue including varying amounts throat. of black spots and stripes. Thick front legs. Dark (nuptial) pad on inner toes of Young froglets look like the front feet. Spawn is laid in gelatinous smaller versions of the clumps. adults. Common toad Adults 5-9 cm. Rough skin. Brown with darker markings. Less commonly, some individuals are very dark, almost black, others are brick-red. Breeding pair Males smaller than females. Breeding males can also be distinguished by dark (nuptial) pads on innermost two toes of the front feet. Toad spawn is laid in gelatinous strings, wrapped around vegetation. Less conspicuous than common frog spawn. Makes small hops rather than jumps of common frog. Toadlets transforming from the Juveniles are tadpole stage are often very dark similar colours in colour. to adults, including brick-red. ARG UK Natterjack toad Strictly protected species, requiring Similar in size and appearance to common toad, a licence to handle but with a pale stripe running along the back. or disturb. This is a rare species, unlikely to be found outside specific dune and heathland habitats. On hatching common frog and toad tadpoles Frog Tadpoles are black. As they develop, common frog tadpoles become mottled with bronze, whereas toad tadpoles remain uniformly dark until the last stages of development. Common frog and toad tadpoles generally complete Toad development in the summer, but development rates are variable; some tadpoles may not transform until later in the year, or they may even remain as tadpoles over winter, becoming much larger than normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Agile Frog Data Analysis Research Project 2015
    Agile Frog Data Analysis Research Project 2015 Final Report - March 2015 Authors: Robert. J. Ward & Richard A. Griffiths Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR 2015 Agile Frog Data Analysis - Final Report Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Report ....................................................................................................................................... 10 1. Site trends - Spawning, peak frog counts, and tadpole releases ................................... 10 1.1. Dataset ................................................................................................................. 10 1.2. Analysis ................................................................................................................ 11 1.3. Results .................................................................................................................. 11 1.4. Discussion
    [Show full text]
  • Triturus Cristatus) and Smooth Newt (Lissotriton Vulgaris) in Cold Climate in Southeast Norway
    diversity Article Assessing the Use of Artificial Hibernacula by the Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) and Smooth Newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) in Cold Climate in Southeast Norway Børre K. Dervo 1,*, Jon Museth 1 and Jostein Skurdal 2 1 Human Dimension Department, Norwegian Institute of Nature Research (NINA), Vormstuguvegen 40, NO-2624 Lillehammer, Norway; [email protected] 2 Maihaugen, Maihaugvegen 1, NO-2609 Lillehammer, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-907-600-77 Received: 27 May 2018; Accepted: 3 July 2018; Published: 5 July 2018 Abstract: Construction of artificial overwintering habitats, hibernacula, or newt hotels, is an important mitigation measure for newt populations in urban and agricultural areas. We have monitored the use of four artificial hotels built in September 2011 close to a 6000 m2 breeding pond in Norway. The four hotels ranged from 1.6 to 12.4 m3 and were located from 5 to 40 m from the breeding pond. In 2013–2015, 57 Great Crested Newts (Triturus cristatus) and 413 Smooth Newts (Lissotriton vulgaris) spent the winter in the hotels. The proportions of juveniles were 75% and 62%, respectively, and the hotels may be important to secure recruitment. Knowledge on emigration routes and habitat quality for summer use and winter hibernation is important to find good locations for newt hotels. The study documented that newts may survive a minimum temperature of −6.7 ◦C. We recommend that newt hotels in areas with harsh climate are dug into the ground in slopes to reduce low-temperature exposure during winter. Keywords: Triturus cristatus; Lissotriton vulgaris; climate; hibernacula 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmate Newt • Smooth Newt Rare Species
    Identifying amphibians Which species are we looking for? Priorities . • Great Crested Newt • Common Frog • Common Toad But also . • Palmate Newt • Smooth Newt Rare species Rare species – Natterjack Toads and Pool Frogs have very limited distributions. You are very unlikely to encounter these species unless you are surveying a site where their presence is already known. Non-native species • Non-native animals are still relatively uncommon and isolated. • But they do occur and it’s worth keeping an eye out for anything unusual. North American Bullfrog Lithobates catesbeiana Common Frog Rana temporaria • Frogs have smooth skins and are relatively athletic, for example leaping about if netted. Dark patch usually present behind the eye Variable coloration and markings Common Frog • Occasional large aggregations in excess of 2000 individuals but usually much less • Often lays spawn in ephemeral ponds which dry up during summer • Wide range of pond pH recorded 4.5 – 8.5 Green (water) frogs • Most likely non native species. • Also variable in coloration. • No dark patch behind eye. • Bask in and around pond. • Call loudly from late spring to summer. • Difficult to approach. Marsh Frog Pelophylax ridibundus Common Toad Bufo bufo • Toads have rough, warty skins, so are readily identifiable from common frogs. Toad spawn • Toad spawn is deposited in long gelatinous strings, wound around water plants. It is usually produced a little after frogspawn. It is harder to spot than the more familiar frogspawn – but it may be revealed during netting. Common Frog and Toad tadpoles • On hatching both species are very dark. However, frog tadpoles become mottled with bronze spots.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, 22 May 2002
    Strasbourg, 21 October 2015 T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 [Inf18e_2015.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 35th meeting Strasbourg, 1-4 December 2015 GROUP OF EXPERTS ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES 1-2 July 2015 Bern, Switzerland - NATIONAL REPORTS - Compilation prepared by the Directorate of Democratic Governance / The reports are being circulated in the form and the languages in which they were received by the Secretariat. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 - 2 – CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE __________ 1. Armenia / Arménie 2. Austria / Autriche 3. Belgium / Belgique 4. Croatia / Croatie 5. Estonia / Estonie 6. France / France 7. Italy /Italie 8. Latvia / Lettonie 9. Liechtenstein / Liechtenstein 10. Malta / Malte 11. Monaco / Monaco 12. The Netherlands / Pays-Bas 13. Poland / Pologne 14. Slovak Republic /République slovaque 15. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” / L’« ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine » 16. Ukraine - 3 - T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 ARMENIA / ARMENIE NATIONAL REPORT OF REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON NATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND INITIATIVES ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COUNTRY AND ITS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Armenia is a small landlocked mountainous country located in the Southern Caucasus. Forty four percent of the territory of Armenia is a high mountainous area not suitable for inhabitation. The degree of land use is strongly unproportional. The zones under intensive development make 18.2% of the territory of Armenia with concentration of 87.7% of total population.
    [Show full text]