Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Report Recommendation for Delisting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Report Recommendation for Delisting Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Report Recommendation for Delisting Executive Summary Tonto Creek was placed on Arizona’s Water Quality Impaired Waters List 303(d) for Total Nitrogen initially in 1996 due to exceeding the aquatic and wildlife cold water (A&Wc) and warm water (A&Ww) designated uses. Total Nitrogen on Tonto Creek has an annual mean standard of 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and a single sample maximum (SSM) standard of 2.0 mg/L. Two reaches of Tonto Creek were listed as impaired due to exceedances of the annual mean nitrogen standard, Reach 013A is the headwaters to confluence with unnamed tributary at N 34° 18’ 10”/W 111° 04’ 14” and Reach 013B is Tonto Creek from unnamed tributary at N 34° 18’ 10”/W 111° 04’ 14” to Haigler Creek. The Total Nitrogen Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was completed in June 2005. The TMDL identified several nonpoint sources as contributors to Total Nitrogen concentrations in Tonto Creek including recreational uses and unincorporated communities/summer home clusters (ADEQ 2005). There is also a permitted point source in the watershed, Arizona Game and Fish Department’s (AGFD) Tonto Creek Fish Hatchery. The 2005 Tonto Creek TMDL recommended implementation projects and appropriate best management practices (BMPs) to decrease the Total Nitrogen levels in Tonto Creek. Through Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Water Quality Improvement Grant (WQIG) funding and other projects, septic system upgrades were made throughout the impaired watershed. AGFD also made several upgrades to the facility. These projects working in concert with each other were effective in reducing Total Nitrogen loads in Tonto Creek. The TMDL recommended future sampling to monitor Total Nitrogen and the effectiveness of implementation projects. Arizona Statute 49-234.J requires ADEQ to review the status of water quality at least once every five years, upon completion of a TMDL, to determine if compliance with applicable surface water quality standards has been achieved, in this case, to meet Total Nitrogen standards. According to data collected throughout the monitoring period in Tonto Creek, Total Nitrogen has decreased since 2005 and water quality has improved. ADEQ recommends that Reaches 013A and 013B be delisted for Total Nitrogen. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must concur with any final delisting decisions. This request for delisting is supported by effectiveness monitoring data that show two consecutive years with no annual mean Total Nitrogen exceedances in either reach. 1 Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen Delist Document January 2014 Background Information Tonto Creek is in the Salt River watershed in Gila County and flows 73 miles before draining into Theodore Roosevelt Lake. The elevation on Tonto Creek is greatest at the Tonto Creek spring, about 6,900 feet, and is about 5,000 feet at the lowest effectiveness monitoring sampling point near the Bear Flat Campground. Major tributaries to Tonto Creek include Christopher Creek, Horton Creek, Haigler Creek, and Dick Williams Creek. The upper Tonto Creek basin is almost entirely within the Tonto National Forest, with some privately-owned properties within the basin. Recreation is the primary land use in the watershed. The vegetation of the basin is primarily Ponderosa Pine forest, although there are areas of recent fires that are dominated by grasses, scrub, snags, and scattered groves of pines. Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen is the sum of Nitrate-Nitrite and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (ammonia, organic, and reduced nitrogen). Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plant and animals but if in excess, high levels of nitrogen can result in low levels of dissolved oxygen. The primary reason for the Total Nitrogen standard in Tonto Creek is to prevent eutrophication in Theodore Roosevelt Lake. Sample Sites There were eight to nine sample sites along the impaired portion of Tonto Creek that were sampled periodically from 2006-2014 after the 2005 TMDL report was written. Due to data quality issues with data collected for Total Nitrogen in 2006 through 2011, only data collected in 2013 and 2014 were used for effectiveness monitoring data analysis. Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) collected data monthly to meet permit requirements; that data was also included in the analysis. Pollutant Sources There is one AZPDES permitted facility in the watershed, the AGFD’s Tonto Creek Fish Hatchery. The remaining sources are all non-point in nature, such as recreation, grazing, natural background, and failing septic systems. TMDL Summary The critical condition for Total Nitrogen in Tonto Creek is the late spring to early fall recreation season. Samples collected for the TMDL were in flows less than 100 cubic 2 Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen Delist Document January 2014 Table 1. Total Nitrogen Annual Mean TMDL Based on Annual Mean Standard of 0.5 mg/l. Natural background load = 72 kg/year and is the nitrogen measured at the natural background site and applied to all other sites. Existing Natural Load Discharge Concentration TMDL WLA LA MOS Reduction Segment Load Background Reduction (cfs) (mg/L) (kg/year) (kg/year) (kg/year) (kg/year) (%) (kg/year) (kg/year) (kg/year) Natural 0.67 0.12 72 299 -- 197 30 72 0 -- Background Fish 1.98 0.528 934 884 583 -- 88 212 50 5 Hatchery Baptist 1.36 0.411 499 607 -- 401 61 146 0 -- Camp Below Horton 1.14 0.304 309 509 -- 336 51 122 0 -- Creek Kohl’s Ranch and Camp 1.68 0.3 450 750 -- 495 75 180 0 -- Tontozona Christopher 1.63 0.338 492 728 -- 480 73 175 0 -- Creek mouth Below Christopher 3.59 0.649 2081 1603 -- 1058 160 385 478 23 Creek Bear Flats 3.99 0.546 1945 1781 -- 1176 178 428 164 8 3 Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen Delist Document January 2014 feet per second (cfs). The TMDL was separated into seven segments within both reaches of Tonto Creek. Two of the segments required reductions of 50 - 478 kilograms per year (kg/year) in order to meet the annual mean standard, according to the TMDL (Table 1). Effectiveness Monitoring Summary ADEQ collected data from the effectiveness monitoring period 2006-2014 on a varying basis. However, only data collected in 2013 and 2014 was used for analysis due to quality control issues in the earlier effectiveness monitoring data. Monthly data collected by AGFD were included in the analysis. ADEQ wrote an effectiveness monitoring report summarizing all data collected to pre-TMDL data (ADEQ 2015). In the 2013 and 2014 data, only one segment below the AGFD Tonto Creek Fish Hatchery exceeded the annual mean of 0.5 mg/L, whereas the TMDL showed the annual mean was exceeded in three segments. In order to be able to remove the not attaining status of the two reaches of Tonto Creek for Total Nitrogen, the data must show two consecutive years where the annual mean does not exceed the water quality standard. The data must include a minimum of three monthly means within a calendar year. After analyzing the 2013 and 2014 data for both reaches, there is evidence to support removing 013A and 013B reaches of Tonto Creek as not attaining for Total Nitrogen (Tables 2 and 3). Table 2. 2013 data to support removal of Tonto Creek from not attaining portion of 303(d) list for Total Nitrogen. 2013 Total Nitrogen Means Reach May June July August September Annual 013A 0.392 0.472 0.495 0.530 0.595 0.499 013B 0.443 0.330 0.392 0.354 0.509 0.406 Table 3. 2014 data to support removal of Tonto Creek from not attaining portion of 303(d) list for Total Nitrogen. 2014 Total Nitrogen Means Reach July August September Annual 013A 0.433 0.377 0.364 0.405 013B 0.365 0.305 0.254 0.308 4 Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen Delist Document January 2014 Implementation ADEQ has provided funding in the form of three 319(h) grants for water quality improvement projects in the Tonto Creek watershed. All of the projects involved upgrades to septic systems or on-site sewer projects. The first grant funded a two-phase project by Gila County Division of Health and Human Services in 2007. In the first phase, seven septic systems were upgraded or replaced. These included one cesspool replaced 20 feet from Tonto Creek, one cesspool system replaced 200 feet from Tonto Creek, and four systems replaced due to failing septic systems discharging into Thompson Draw, a tributary of Tonto Creek. The second phase of the Gila County septic system upgrade project was completed two years after the first phase. Phase two included upgrading or replacing five septic systems. Three systems replaced cesspool systems with overflow leach lines that were zero feet from Tonto Creek. One system replaced a cesspool with overflow leach lines 30 yards from Tonto Creek. The final upgrade replaced a failing septic system discharging partially treated effluent directly to the surface and eventually into Tonto Creek. The most recent project in the watershed was the Tonto Rim Christian Camp Water Quality Improvement Project on Tonto Creek in 2010. The entire septic system was replaced and upgraded, including all of the piping. Additionally, the deep trench leach process was converted to a drip irrigation technique, reducing saturated pollutants to the creek. AGFD has been making gradual upgrades to the Tonto Creek Fish Hatchery outfall to reduce nutrient loading into Tonto Creek. Some of the upgrades included improving wetlands and adding centrifuges.These upgrades were not completed using ADEQ 319(h) grant funds since they are related to meeting AZPDES permit conditions. There is more work to do, but the hatchery discharge is not leading to a Total Nitrogen impairment.
Recommended publications
  • Area Land Use Plan
    DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E. VERDE RIVER DRAW II BOY SCOUT CAMP FR 64 FR 64 WHISPERING PINES PINE MEADOWS BEAR FLATS FR 199 DETAIL VIEW #3 FLOWING SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #4 DETAIL VIEW #5 DIAMOND POINT FOREST HOMES & 87 FR 29 COLLINS RANCH E. VERDE RIVER COCONINO COUNTY EAST VERDE PARK FR 64 260 FR 64 TONTO VILLAGE GILA COUNTYLION SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #6 DETAIL VIEW #7 DETAIL VIEW #8 FR 200 FR FR 291 PONDEROSA SPRINGS CHRISTOPHER CREEK 260 HAIGLER CREEK HAIGLER CREEK (HIGHWAY 260 REALIGNMENT) COLCORD MOUNTAIN HOMESITES HUNTER CREEK FR 200 DETAIL VIEW #9 DETAIL VIEW #10 DETAIL VIEW #11 ROOSEVELT LAKE ESTATES 87 FR 184 188 OXBOW ESTATES SPRING CREEK 188 JAKES CORNER KEY MAP: LEGEND Residential - 3.5 to 5 du/ac Residential - 5 to 10 du/ac Regional Highways and Significant Roadways NORTHWEST NORTHEAST Major Rivers or Streams Residential - 10+ du/ac Gila County Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial WEST EAST Federal/Incorporated Area Lands CENTRAL CENTRAL Light Industrial LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS Heavy Industrial SOUTH Residential - 0 to 0.1 du/ac Public Facilities AREA LAND USE PLAN Residential - 0.1 to 0.4 du/ac DETAILED VIEWS Multi-Functional Corridor FIGURE 2.F Residential - 0.4 to 1.0 du/ac Mixed Use Residential - 1 to 2 du/ac Resource Conservation 0' NOVEMBER, 2003 3 Mi Residential - 2 to 3.5 du/ac GILA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2012 Potential Resort/Lodging Use 1 1/2 Mi GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY REPORT of INVESTIGATIONS of SPRINGS in the MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By
    United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey PRELIMINARY REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS OF SPRINGS IN THE MOGOLLON RIM REGION, ARIZONA By J. H. Feth With sections on: Base flow of streams By N. D. White and Quality of water By J. D. Hem Open-file report. Not reviewed for conformance with editorial standards of the Geological Survey. Tucson, Arizona June 1954 CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... 1 Introduction................................................. 3 Purpose and scope of investigation.......................... 3 Location and extent of area ................................ 4 Previous investigations.................................... 5 Personnel and acknowledgments ............................ 5 Geography .................................................. 6 Land forms and physiographic history ...................... 6 Drainage ................................................ 6 Climate ................................................. 6 Development and industry.................................. 8 Minerals"................................................. 9 Water ................................................... 9 Geology .................................................... 10 Stratigraphy ............................................. 10 Rocks of pre-Mesozoic age ............................. 10 Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks .................... 10 Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks .............. 11 Lake beds .......................................... 11 San Carlos basin
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Name
    United States Department of Agriculture Payson Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Project Draft Environmental Assessment United States Forest Service Tonto National Forest, Payson Ranger District January 2018 For More Information Contact: Eric Oswald Payson Ranger District 1009 E Hwy 260 928 474-7900 [email protected] In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Overview and Limnological Reconnaissance of Theodore Roosevelt Lake, Arizona by LISA K
    Historical Overview and Limnological Reconnaissance of Theodore Roosevelt Lake, Arizona By LISA K. HAM U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95 4053 Prepared in cooperation with the ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Tucson, Arizona 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 375 South Euclid Avenue Denver Federal Center Tucson, AZ 85719-6644 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Definition of terms........................................................................................................................................ VI Abstract........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER HIKING GUIDE Arizona Is a Dream State for Hikers
    SUMMER HIKING GUIDE Arizona is a dream state for hikers. There’s a trail for everyone, and the weather allows for year-round hiking. Summer, however, is when most people hit the trail. Thus, our fifth-annual Summer Hiking Guide, which spotlights our top 10 trails, along with some bonus hikes in the White Mountains and five wheelchair-accessible trails that are just right this time of year. BY ROBERT STIEVE One of the most popular trails in the Coconino National Forest, the West Fork Oak Creek Trail requires several creek-crossings. | PAUL MARKOW 18 JUNE 2012 for the trailhead. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION: National Park Widforss Trail Service fees apply. NORTH RIM, GRAND CANYON 1 VEHICLE REQUIREMENTS: None 1 Inner Basin Trail Widforss Trail DOGS ALLOWED: No FLAGSTAFF NORTH RIM, GRAnd CANYON USGS MAP: Bright Angel Point Named for Gunnar Widforss, an artist who INFORMATION: Backcountry Office, Grand Humphreys Trail FLAGSTAFF 6 painted landscapes in the national parks in the Canyon National Park, 928-638-7875 or www. 4 Weatherford Trail 1920s and 1930s, this relatively easy trail fol- nps.gov/grca 3 FLAGSTAFF lows the rim of the Grand Canyon to Widforss FLAGSTAFF Point. And getting there, you’ll pass through Foot Note: At the height of Gunnar Widforss’ West Fork Oak 5 Creek Trail an idyllic forest of Colorado blue spruce, career in 1929, just after his 50th birthday, the OAK CREEK CANYON 8 Engelmann spruce, white firs, Douglas firs and American stock market crashed, sending the 9 Maxwell Trail MOGOLLON RIM aspens, the latter of which can be seen growing artist into near obscurity and his paintings into 7 West Clear Creek Trail in droves where recent fires have burned.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Plan Monitoring and Inventory Report Tonto National Forest
    Forest Plan Monitoring and Inventory Report Tonto National Forest Fiscal Year 2011 United States Forest Service Southwestern Region June 2012 Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................3 Fish and Wildlife .......................................................................................................................4 Insect & Disease .......................................................................................................................5 Noxious Weeds.........................................................................................................................5 Range ........................................................................................................................................8 Recreation .................................................................................................................................8 Riparian Condition ....................................................................................................................9 Transportation Management ................................................................................................. 10 Visibility.................................................................................................................................... 11 Watersheds ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub (Gila Robusta) Status Survey of the Lower Colorado River Basin
    ROUNDTAIL CHUB (GILA ROBUSTA) STATUS SURVEY OF THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN Jeremy B. Voeltz, Wildlife Technician Nongame Branch, Wildlife Management Division Final Report to The Central Arizona Project Native Fish Conservation and Nonnative Aquatic Species Management and Control Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Field Office Phoenix, Arizona and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Phoenix Area Office Phoenix, Arizona Technical Report 186 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Program Manager: Terry B. Johnson Arizona Game and Fish Department 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 January 2002 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director, DOHQ 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 and The Office for Diversity and Civil Rights U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Room 300 Arlington, Virginia 22203 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with all provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Tonto National Forest U.S. DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Forest Servi
    Use Code 141 Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Tonto National Forest U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service 03/01/2011 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity provider and employer. Prospectus for Campground and Related Granger-Thye Concessions, Tonto National Forest, Payson Ranger District Table of Contents I. Business Opportunity A. Introduction B. Area Description C. Description of Developed Recreation Sites and Facilities D. Government-Furnished Property E. Government-Furnished Supplies F. Utilities and Waste Management II. Forest Service Concession Program and Policies A. National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) B. Pass Discounts C. Camp Stamps D. Site Closures E. Reserved Administrative Use F. Applicable Forest Orders G. Fee Tickets and Compilation of Use and Revenue Data H. Customer Service Comment Cards I. Performance Evaluations J. Accessibility K. Camping Unit Capacity L. Stay Limit M. Fees Charged to the Public N. Law Enforcement O. Other Pertinent Information III.
    [Show full text]
  • The East Verde Is a Rapidly Degrading Stream Flowing Through a Country Of
    An archeological reconnaissance of the East Verde River in central Arizona Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Peck, Fred Rawlings,1925- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 22:17:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191414 FroritespieCe The East Verde is a rapidly degradingstream flowing through a country of high relief. AN AtC HEOLOGICAL RECO ISANCE OF THE Ei$T VERDE RIVER IN CENTPLMIDNA by Fred R. Peck A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M$TER OF ARTS in the Graduate College, University of Arizona l96 Approved: Director of T is Y Date /95 This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or repro- duction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]