DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Sharing Heritage Programme Dec 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Sharing Heritage Programme Dec 2015 Heritage Lottery Fund Evaluation of the Sharing Heritage programme Simon Jaquet and Jennifer Waterton Final report December 2015 Simon Jaquet Consultancy Services Ltd 69 Restalrig Rd Leith Edinburgh EH6 8BG www.simonjaquet.com Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 10 2 Background ................................................................................................................................... 11 Overview of the ‘Sharing Heritage’ grants programme ............................................................ 11 Heritage Lottery Fund Outcomes Framework .......................................................................... 11 Purpose of the evaluation ........................................................................................................ 12 Aims and objectives of the evaluation ...................................................................................... 12 Structure of the report .............................................................................................................. 13 3 Research approach ....................................................................................................................... 14 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 14 Limitations of the research approach ....................................................................................... 14 4 Findings: profile of applications ..................................................................................................... 16 First time applicant status ........................................................................................................ 16 Type of organisation ................................................................................................................. 16 Heritage type ............................................................................................................................ 17 Amount of grant requested ...................................................................................................... 17 Region ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Priority Development Area Status ............................................................................................ 19 Applications from a wider range of communities ..................................................................... 19 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 19 5 Findings: review of 100 selected projects ..................................................................................... 21 Information provided on 100 selected projects ........................................................................ 21 Do projects achieve their 'approved purposes' / intended outcomes? .................................... 22 Are project assessments undertaken by HLF robust? ............................................................. 25 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 28 6 Findings: interviews with 35 successful applicants ....................................................................... 30 Outcomes ................................................................................................................................. 30 The application process ........................................................................................................... 38 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................ 40 Lessons learnt .......................................................................................................................... 41 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 41 7 Findings: interviews with 15 unsuccessful applicants ................................................................... 43 Awareness and understanding of the Sharing Heritage programme ....................................... 43 Experience of the application process ..................................................................................... 44 Subsequent development of the project .................................................................................. 46 Other Comments ...................................................................................................................... 46 Case Papers ............................................................................................................................ 47 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 47 8 Findings: 10 case studies .............................................................................................................. 49 Selection of case studies ......................................................................................................... 49 Who we spoke to ...................................................................................................................... 49 The 10 case studies ................................................................................................................. 50 Outcomes ................................................................................................................................. 50 Partnerships ............................................................................................................................. 52 Capacity building ...................................................................................................................... 53 Sustainability and legacy.......................................................................................................... 53 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 54 9 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 55 Evaluation Aim 1 ...................................................................................................................... 55 Evaluation of the Sharing Heritage programme - final report (December 2015) 2 Evaluation Aim 2 ...................................................................................................................... 56 Evaluation Aim 3 ...................................................................................................................... 57 Evaluation Aim 4 ...................................................................................................................... 58 Other issues ............................................................................................................................. 59 10 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 61 Achievement of HLF outcomes ................................................................................................ 61 Impact of the Outcomes Framework on project design, planning and delivery ....................... 62 Grant making process .............................................................................................................. 62 New and diverse applicants ..................................................................................................... 62 Measurement, recording and definitional issues ..................................................................... 63 HLF decision making process .................................................................................................. 63 Benchmarking quality ............................................................................................................... 63 11 Issues for further consideration ................................................................................................. 64 Scenario 1 – Building on the status quo .................................................................................. 64 Scenario 2 – Developing a stronger focus on community / voluntary organisations ............... 65 Scenario 3 – Revisiting the relationship between the Outcomes Framework and the Sharing Heritage Programme ................................................................................................................ 67 Scenario 4 – Developing a strategic partnership with UK Arts Councils ................................. 69 Appendix 1: Profile of 100 Selected Applications ................................................................................. 70 Appendix 2: 10 case studies ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Getting to Know Your River
    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..
    [Show full text]
  • Wallingford 390 Number Status Description Width Conditions + Limitations Remarks (Non-Conclusive Information)
    Wallingford 390 Number Status Description Width Conditions + Limitations Remarks (non-conclusive information) 1 FP From Thames Street at St. Leonard's Church, S to 1) Diversion Order confirmed 4.2.65. 2) Cholsey Parish boundary. Diversion Order confirmed 23.6.69. (See also Wallingford FP 3.) 2 FP From FP 1 at the footbridge at the Crowmarsh Parish boundary, W to Reading Road (A329). 3 FP From Reading Road (A329) at the Rectory, E to FP 1. Diversion Order 4.2.65. See also FP 1. 4 FP From FP 3, E of Chalmore Gardens, S to FP2. The former Chalmore Gardens (Allotments) were at SU 607 888. 5 FP From Crowmarsh Parish boundary E of Castle Priory, N Part Towing Path under The Street at Wallingford Bridge and E to the Crowmarsh Parish boundary. 6 FP From FP 26 at Wallingford Bridge NNE to Dedication Agreement 7.1968. Brightwell-cum-Sotwell Parish boundary. 7 FP From Brightwell-cum-Sotwell Parish boundary NE of Cemetery on the NW corner of Kings Meadow, leading SSW and W to Shillingford Road (A329). 8 FP From Road at NE corner of Isolation Hospital, E and ENE to Shillingford Road (A329). 9 FP From Road at N end of Union Terrace, ESE to St. George's Road at Isolation Hospital. 10 FP From Wantage Road (A4130) at Wallingford Town boundary at the Bypass roundabout, ENE to Brightwell-cum-Sotwell Parish boundary near Sand Elms. (Part Stopped Up by The Oxfordshire County Council (Wallingford Bypass Classified Road) (Side Roads) 1989. 11 FP From Croft Road at Croft Villas, generally W to junction of FP 13 and FP 15 at Market Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock
    NRA Thames 254 National Rivers Authority Thames Region TR44 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 NRA Thames Region Document for INTERNAL CIRCULATION only National River Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT Overview 2 Geology and Topography 2 Hydrology 2 Water Resources 5 Water Quality 9 Pollution Control 14 Consented Discharges 15 * Flood Defence 18 Fisheries 18 Conservation 19 Landscape 21 Recreation 23 Navigation 26 Land Use Planning Context 29 Minerals 31 P2J73/ i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review Page 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 34 South West Oxfordshire Reservoir Proposal 34 Ground water Pollution 35 River Levels & Flows 35 Habitat Degradation 35 Wolvercote Pit 36 Eutrophication of the Thames 36 River Thames : Seacourt Stream Relationship 36 The River Thames Through Oxford 37 Oxford Structures Study 37 Oxford Sewage Treatment Works 37 Kidlington Sewage Treatment Works 38 Oxford Sewers 38 Development Pressure 38 Navigation Issues 39 Landscape Issues 39 Recreation Issues 39 Wiltshire Berkshire Canal 40 Summary of Key Issues 41 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 P2573/ i i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Details of Licensed Ground/Surface Water Abstractions of Greater than lML/day 9 2.2 RQOs,
    [Show full text]
  • Hats on for a True Gent
    Vol 30 No 8 August 2019 HATS ON FOR A TRUE GENT We did it! In last month’s Woodcote Correspondent I invited the interval between innings, a children’s match the whole village to join the picnic and over 200 attracted over fifty youngsters who we hope will one accepted the invitation! It was an unforgettable day day form the basis of the Woodcote Cricket Club! and a real village event. Not a detail was spared as The £1000 grant we received from the English families arrived on the Green to pay tribute to, and Cricket Board, as part of the Cricket World Cup celebrate the life of former Cricket Club President, Sponsorship, was put to Pete Aldridge. excellent use as our ‘state-of- The Red Lion captain, Neil the-art’ barbecue. It was McDougall, paid a unique manned by Ryan Van and fitting tribute to his great Heerden, Simon Fuller and friend by kitting out his Ken Groom who produced whole team in striking mouth-watering burgers and Panama hats; a Pete Aldridge hot dogs throughout the trademark when watching afternoon,. The ‘streaker’ was cricket! not pre-arranged, but it’s happened before at cricket The day opened with both and everyone seemed to be teams lining up for a amused! minute’s applause for Pete and then the game At the end of the match, the commenced. The glorious Pete Aldridge Trophy was weather provided extra Fine shot by Connor Mattimore presented to the winning encouragement as more and more families flocked to captain, Neil McDougall and Neil, a great Cricket the Green to join in the fun.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    NRA THAMES 66 Space to live3 space to play A R e c r ea t io n St r a t eg y f o r t h e R iver T h am es SPORTS council. NRA o N TENTS TITLE FOREWORD AUTHORS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE THAMES - A NATIONAL RECREATION ASSET 1.1 Managing the Thames: who is involved 1.2 National Rivers Authority 1.3 Sports Council 1.4 National Government 1.5 Local Government 1.6 Other Agencies THE RECREATIONAL VALUE OF THE COUNTRYSIDE:- THE NATIONAL SCENE 2.1 Participation in Countryside Recreation 2.2 Water Related Sports Activities 2.3 Individual Recreational Activities 2.3.1 A ngling 2.3.2 Boating 2.3.3 Canoeing 2.3.4 Rowing 2.4 Other Water Sports 2.4.1 Sub-Aqua 2.4.2 Windsurfing 2.4.3 Waterski-ing 2.4.4 Personal Watercraft 2.5 Countryside Recreation 2.5.1 Walking 2.5.2 Cycling 2.6 Future Trends in Water Sports Participation 2.7 Countryside Recreation in the next 10 years RECREATION ON THE THAMES: SETTING THE LOCAL SCENE 3.1 Thames Based Recreation - Club Activities 3.2 Casual Recreation on the Thames 3.2.1 Thames Path Visitor Survey PLEASURE BOATING ON THE THAMES 4.1 Non-Tidal Navigation 4.1.1 Trends in Boating 4.1.2 Boat Movements 4.1.3 Factors Affecting Boat Traffic 4.2 The Tidal Navigation 4.2.1 PIA & NRA Responsibilities 4.2.2 Boating on the Tidal Thames 4.3 Who Boats on the Thames? ---------------------------------- --------- - ENVIRONMENT AGENCY- 11 7529 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 15/02/2011, 10.00
    Public Document Pack County Council 15 February 2011 Agenda County Hall, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1ND www.oxfordshire.gov.uk Fax: 01865 783195 Media Enquiries 01865 815266 Declarations of Interest This note briefly summarises the position on interests which you must d eclare at the meeting. Please refer to the Members’ Code of Conduct in Part 9.1 of the Constitution for a fuller description. The duty to declare … You must always declare any “personal interest” in a matter under consideration, ie where the matter affects (either positively or negatively): (i) any of the financial and other interests which you are required to notify for inclusion in the statutory Register of Members’ Interests; or (ii) your own well-being or financial position or that of any member of your family or any person with whom you have a close association more than it would affect other people in the County. Whose interests are included … “Member of your family” in (ii) above includes spouses and partners and other relatives’ spouses and partners, and extends to the employment and investment interests of relatives and friends and their involvement in other bodies of various descriptions. For a full list of what “relative” covers, please see the Code of Conduct. When and what to declare … The best time to make any declaration is under the agenda item “Declarations of Interest”. Under the Code you must declare not later than at the start of the item concerned or (if different) as soon as the interest “becomes apparent”. In making a declaration you must state the nature of the interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Crossings Near Wallingford from Roman to Early Norman Times
    Thames Crossings near Wallingford from Roman to Early Norman Times A.J. Grayson Summary This article presents evidence for the location of Roman, Anglo-Saxon, and early Norman crossings of the Thames near Wallingford. The likely crossing points to Wallingford from the east bank of the river were between Day’s Lock, near Dorchester, and Goring to the south. The two most important fords were at Shillingford and Wallingford, giving access to Wallingford from lands to the north, east, and south-east. Both were subsequently the sites of bridges, Shillingford perhaps as early as the tenth century. he purpose of this study is to review evidence for early Thames crossings which gave access to TWallingford (Oxon., formerly Berks.), and to discuss their evolution. The relevant stretch of the river is downstream from Day’s Lock, west of Dorchester, to Goring and Streatley, 8 km south of Wallingford.1 Access to Wallingford from Abingdon further north did not require a Thames crossing, while access from Goring and its hinterland to the east and south-east would have been feasible via the ford at Wallingford and, in low flow conditions, Moulsford or Goring/Streatley. Here, as elsewhere, river crossings, whether natural or man-made, were crucial in determining road alignments and to a lesser extent the location of settlements close to the river. Wallingford has been chosen as the focus for two reasons. The first is the fact that at least from the early Middle Ages Wallingford was the lowest point on the Thames with an all-season ford.2 This was no doubt important to Alfred when he chose this location for a Thames-side burh, a siting which reflects the importance given to the defence of the crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewallingford Experience
    The Wallingford Experience Includes history of Wallingford, places to visit and shopping guide... Contents The Town Information Centre 2 Riverside Moorings 17 Places of Interest in Wallingford 4 A Unique Shopping Experience 18 Wallingford - an Ancient Borough 6 Cholsey & Wallingford Railway 27 Judge Blackstone 11 The Corn Exchange 27 Agatha Christie 12 Nearby Places to Visit 28 Remembering Wilding & Andrew 13 Accommodation 30 Wallingford Museum 14 Website Information & Map 31 Wallingford Rowing Club 15 Weddings in the Town Hall 32 The River Thames 16 Town Information Centre The Information Centre is operated by the Town Council covering the local area - offering information on who to contact and where to go for what, directions, history and what’s on. Town Information Centre - Undercroft - Town Hall - Market Place T: 01491 826 972 E: [email protected] The Wallingford Experience is produced by Wallingford Town Council Every effort has been made to ensure that the contents and information contained in this brochure were correct at time of going to press. This is a Wallingford publication - Published by: Cllr Dee Cripps - Production by: NP Design & Print Ltd. 01491 824827 WELCOME TO WALLINGFORD In July of 2013 I was lucky enough With regards to accommodation we to be appointed Town Clerk for also boast a great local Hotel, right Wallingford Town Council. I say in the heart of the town, The lucky because I genuinely believe George as well a host of local bed our residential and business and breakfast accommodation. community are lucky
    [Show full text]
  • 429 Appendix B Mean Discharge Estimations the Purpose Of
    429 Appendix B Mean Discharge Estimations The purpose of Appendix B is to investigate under what conditions it is acceptable to estimate the value of mean discharge on the assumption that discharge is proportional to catchment area. Data have been taken from Hydrological Data UK. Data have been selected from the following areas:- 1. Southern Region - the catchments used in determining the discharge at the mills in East Sussex. 2. The Wye Catchment - the catchments used in determining the discharge at the mills in the Lower Wye valley. 3. The North West Region - relatively high precipitation. 4. The North East Region - high variability of precipitation between source and outlet. 5. The Anglian Region - relatively low precipitation. Line 1&2. 1. River. 2. Place. 3. Catchment Area. (km2) 4. Mean annual runoff. (mm) 5. Maximum annual runoff. (mm) 6. Minimum annual runoff. (mm) 7. Recorded Mean Discharge (m3 s-1) Line 3. 1. Ratio of increase in area. 2. Ratio of estimated mean discharge to recorded mean discharge. Estimated Mean Discharge = Mean Discharge at A x Catchment Area at B Catchment Area at A Sites at which the estimated discharge is not within the range 80% - 125% of the recorded discharge are printed in italics. ‘Area’ indicates that the ratio of the catchment areas was greater than 2. ‘R.O.’ indicates that the ratio of the runoff’s at the two points is greater than 125%. ‘Abs’ indicates that there is artificial abstraction or augmentation on the river. ‘Eph’ indicates that the river is ephemeral. 430 Southern Region Darent. Otford. 100 186 460 80 0.59 Lullingstone.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising Guide for the River Thames
    Cruising Guide to The River Thames and Connecting Waterways 2012-2013 Supported by Introduction and Contents As Chairman of BMF Thames Valley, I am immensely Introduction 3 proud to introduce the 2012/13 Cruising Guide to The River Thames Management 4-5 the River Thames and its connecting waterways. The Non-tidal River Thames 7-13 Cruising Guide has been jointly produced with the Environment Agency and is supported by the Port Bridge Heights - Non-tidal River Thames 14 of London Authority - it provides all the relevant St John’s Lock - Shifford Lock 15 information anyone would need whilst boating on Shifford Lock - Sandford Lock 16-17 The River Thames and its connecting waterways. Sandford Lock - Benson Lock 18-19 BMF Thames Valley is a Regional Association of the Cleeve Lock - Sonning Lock 20-21 British Marine Federation, the National trade association for the leisure boating industry. BMF Thames Valley Sonning Lock - Boulter’s Locks 22-23 represents around 200 businesses that all share a Boulter’s Lock - Old Windsor Lock 24-25 passion for our inland waterways. 2012 is going to be Bell Weir Lock - Shepperton Lock 26-27 an exciting year on the River Thames with the London Shepperton Lock - Teddington Lock 28-29 2012 Olympics and the Diamond Jubilee celebrations. What’s new for 2012! The Tidal Thames 30 • New map design Tidal Thames Cruising Times 31 • Complete map of navigable River Thames from Lechlade Teddington Lock - Vauxhall Bridge 32-33 to the Thames Barrier • Information on the non-tidal Thames - Environment Agency Lambeth Bridge
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the Genesis of the Honour of Wallingford
    6 THE GENESIS OF THE HONOUR OF WALLINGFORD K. S. B. Keats-Rohan Abstract king. It also shows a clear link between him and the manors From a twelfth-century perspective, the honour of that constituted the honour of Wallingford after 1066. These Wallingford appears to be a typical Norman institution. holdings form the starting point for a discussion of the However, a re-examination of its constituent parts indicates honour’s formation. that through marriage it was largely derived from the lands Let us start with a brief reminder of why Wallingford of Wigod of Wallingford and his family. Wigod appears to was important (Figure 6.1). Lying on the river terrace, pro- have been one of Edward the Confessor’s stallers and the tected by a hinterland of well-watered higher ground and estates that he held were what was effectively a pre-con- surrounded by fertile agricultural land, it was an ideal settle- quest ‘castlery’with origins in a period before the formation ment area, well placed for the eventual development of a of the county of Berkshire. Throughout its history the town. In 1066 Wallingford was the last place upstream at honour was to remain under the tight control of the crown, which the Thames was fordable without bridge or boat. It reflecting its strategic role in the defence of the middle was a significant crossing point on a major waterway which Thames valley. had been exploited by the Saxons during the migration period in the 5th and 6th centuries, and subsequently devel- Keywords oped for both defensive and economic purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rowers' Guide to the Thames 1 Thames Tour What to See When
    Thames Tour What to see when rowing the Thames Christopher Dodd This guide was written for an International Rowing Federation (FISA) seven-day rowing tour of the Thames in 2003, starting in Godstow near Oxford and progressing downstream to Putney in London. It uses the terms ‘port’ and ‘starboard’ to describe the location of sights. As seen from the cox’s seat, ‘port’ (stroke side) is to the left of boat, ‘starboard’ (bow side) is to the right - in the direction in which the boat and the stream are moving. The River Thames, also called the Isis in the Oxford area, is important for several reasons. For centuries it was a great trading route, connecting the Thames Valley and, through the canal system, the west and midlands of England with the great port of London. It is a great source of drinking water for London, and as railways shut down transport by water, they opened the Thames Valley to Londoners for enjoyment and recreation. The modern sport of rowing was born on the Thames, and it remains a world centre. The guide was updated in 2013. Please contribute comments and corrections HERE. © Christopher Dodd Seven days from Oxford to London DAY 1 – Godstow to Clifton Hampden (27 km, 6 locks) DAY 2 - Clifton Hampden to Pangbourne (29 km, 4 locks) DAY 3 - Pangbourne to Henley (24 km, 6 locks) DAY 4 - Henley to Maidenhead (25 km, 6 locks) DAY 5 - Maidenhead to Staines (24 km, 5 locks) DAY 6 - Staines to Teddington (28 km, 6 locks) DAY 7 - Teddington to Putney (15 km) Rowers’ guide to the Thames 1 DAY 1 – Godstow to Clifton Hampden, 27 km, 6 locks The tour starts at St Edward’s school boathouse, close to Godstow lock beside the remains of Godstow Abbey.
    [Show full text]