Marine Ecology Progress Series 330:75
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Kelp Ecosystem Connections
Consequences of trophic, foundational and engineering services provided by kelp KELP ECOSYSTEM communities CONNECTIONS Maxwell D. Calloway The Evergreen State College Northwest Straits Commission Puget Sound Restoration Fund PREFACE: • Nursery habitat • Trophic subsidies from detrital export • “Stock” open water fisheries • Increased biodiversity • Demonstrate the importance of kelp ecosystems for mid and high trophic level and commercially OBJECTIVE important fin-fish species. CONTRIBUTIONS TO NEARSHORE FOOD WEBS DIRECT GRAZING • Not the most common. • Urchins are most famous example. • Puget Sound: • Kelp Crab (Pugettia Producta) • Littorinid snails (Lacuna vincta) • Amphipods • Abundances of mesograzers may have greater impacts than more conspicuous grazers. • Ratio of biomass to grazing rate. • Photo Courtesy: Helen Berry, DNR; Wikimedia Commons DETRITAL PATHWAYS Distal ends of blades Erosion = 17% - 100% of Plant itself is Support for erode POC and annual NPP (Krause-Jensen & leaching DOC biofilms and DOC Duarte, 2016, Nature Geosciences) into the water, microbes DISLODGMENT • Lower as proportion of NPP than erosion. • Export of kelp to pelagic, beach, continental shelves and deep ocean trenches. • Quickly colonized by marine and terrestrial invertebrates. • 43% of annual NPP exported (Krause- Jensen & Duarte, 2016, Nature Geosciences) Photo Courtesy: Linnaea Mallette, www.publicdomainpictures.net STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS • ∂13C and ∂15N enrichment • ∂15N – trophic position • ∂13C – source of production Figure Courtesy: Müldner, -
Larval Development of Scyra Acutifrons (Crustacea: Decapoda: Epialtidae)
Animal Cells and Systems Vol. 14, No. 4, December 2010, 333Á341 Larval development of Scyra acutifrons (Crustacea: Decapoda: Epialtidae) with a key from the northern Pacific Seong Mi Oh and Hyun Sook Ko* Department of Biological Science, Silla University, Busan 617-736, Korea (Received 23 June 2010; received in revised form 28 July 2010; accepted 2 August 2010) The larvae of Scyra acutifrons are described and illustrated for the first time. The larval stage consists of two zoeal and a megalopal stages. The zoea of S. acutifrons is compared with those of other known species of the Epialtidae from the northern Pacific. The zoea of Scyra acutifrons can be easily distinguished from that of S. compressipes by having a longer rostral carapace spine and an endopod of maxillule with three setae. It is found that the genus Scyra (Pisinae) shows a great similarity to Pisoides bidentatus (Pisinae) and the genus Pugettia (Epialtinae) in the family Epialtidae; especially, S. acutidens coincides well with two Pugettia species (Pugettia incisa and P. gracilis) in the characteristics of the zoeal mouthpart appendages. To facilitate the study of plankton-collected material, a provisional key to the known zoeae of the Epialtidae from the northern Pacific is provided. Keywords: Epialtidae; larva; Scyra acutifrons; Pugettia; zoeal morphology; key; northern Pacific Introduction individually at a water temperature of 15918 and The majoid family Epialtidae contains four subfami- salinity of 29.790.6. Each of the individually reared lies; Epialtinae, Pisinae, Pliosomatinae, and Tychinae zoeae was held in a plastic well containing 5Á6ml of (see Ng et al. 2008). -
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber ......................................................................... -
(Brachyura, Majoidea) in Nearshore Kelp Habitats in Alaska, U.S.A
TEMPORAL TRENDS OF TWO SPIDER CRABS (BRACHYURA, MAJOIDEA) IN NEARSHORE KELP HABITATS IN ALASKA, U.S.A. BY BENJAMIN DALY1,3) and BRENDA KONAR2,4) 1) University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, 201 Railway Ave, Seward, Alaska 99664, U.S.A. 2) University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, P.O. Box 757220, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Pugettia gracilis and Oregonia gracilis are among the most abundant crab species in Alaskan kelp beds and were surveyed in two different kelp habitats in Kachemak Bay, Alaska, U.S.A., from June 2005 to September 2006, in order to better understand their temporal distribution. Habitats included kelp beds with understory species only and kelp beds with both understory and canopy species, which were surveyed monthly using SCUBA to quantify crab abundance and kelp density. Substrate complexity (rugosity and dominant substrate size) was assessed for each site at the beginning of the study. Pugettia gracilis abundance was highest in late summer and in habitats containing canopy kelp species, while O. gracilis had highest abundance in understory habitats in late summer. Large- scale migrations are likely not the cause of seasonal variation in abundances. Microhabitat resource utilization may account for any differences in temporal variation between P. gracilis and O. gracilis. Pugettia gracilis may rely more heavily on structural complexity from algal cover for refuge with abundances correlating with seasonal changes in kelp structure. Oregonia gracilis mayrelyonkelp more for decoration and less for protection provided by complex structure. Kelp associated crab species have seasonal variation in habitat use that may be correlated with kelp density. -
Changes in Cover and Use of Zostera Marina Habitat in Elkhorn Slough, California
California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 2009 Changes in cover and use of Zostera marina habitat in Elkhorn Slough, California Nora Elaine Grant California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes Recommended Citation Grant, Nora Elaine, "Changes in cover and use of Zostera marina habitat in Elkhorn Slough, California" (2009). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 71. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes/71 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. Unless otherwise indicated, this project was conducted as practicum not subject to IRB review but conducted in keeping with applicable regulatory guidance for training purposes. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHANGES IN COVER AND USE OF ZOSTERA MARINA HABITAT IN ELKHORN SLOUGH, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Moss Landing Marine Labs California State University Monterey Bay In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Nora Elaine Grant December 2009 ! 2009 Nora Elaine Grant ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT CHANGES IN COVER AND USE OF ZOSTERA MARINA HABITAT IN ELKHORN SLOUGH, CALIFORNIA by Nora E. Grant Seagrasses provide an array of ecosystem services to the nearshore marine community. The goal of this study was to begin to determine the role of the seagrass, Zostera marina, in habitat provisioning within Elkhorn Slough, CA. Part one uses maps to assess variability in the spatial extent of Zostera marina in Elkhorn Slough over time and the potential of Zostera to provide a unique habitat to species assemblages within the slough. -
California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA)
California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA) September 19, 2005 (v.3.0) MLPA Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Central Coast Regional Profile September 19, 2005 (v.3.0) INSIDE COVER MEMO: This Final Regional Profile of the Central Coast Study Region (Pigeon Point to Point Conception, CA) provides information to support the implementation of the Marine Life Protection Act in this region. In addition to this document, the Regional Profile includes spatial data layers posted on the MLPA Internet Mapping Service (IMS) site (http://maps.msi.ucsb.edu/mlpa) and maps posted on the MLPA website (http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mrd/mlpa/draftdocuments.html). A draft of the Regional Profile was provided to the Central Coast Regional Stakeholder Group on June 1, 2005; a draft final version was provided to them on August 1, 2005. Verbal and written comments were received from the stakeholders and addressed to the extent possible in this final version. This final profile was reviewed by members of the MLPA Science Advisory Team. The MLPA Initiative and CDFG staff are compiling and developing additional data layers and conducting GIS analyses. All of the spatial data layers will eventually be posted on the MLPA IMS site. In addition, new research contracts have been initiated to collect additional data. These include: • An assessment of patterns of non-consumptive use in the Central California Coast (C. LaFranchi and M. Tamanaha; results provided in Appendix -
Marine Life List
Intertidal and Upper Subtidal Marine Life at Sargeant Bay This list is based on the numerous beach seine events organised once a year from 1987 to 2003. Recommended reading: The beachcomber’s Guide to Seashore Life in the Pacific North West by J.Duane Sept) Seaweeds in the Upper Subtidal Zone Enteromorpha sp. Sea hair (Tube weed) Green algae Ulva fenestrata Sea lettuce Ulva taenjata Corkscrew sea lettuce Laminaria saccharina Sugar kelp Brown algae Fucus gardneri Rockweed Sargassum muticum Sargassum Mastocarpus papillatus Papillate seaweed (Sea tar) Red algae Mazzaella splendens Iridescent seaweed Neorhodomela larix Black pine Flowering Plants Zostera marina Eelgrass Zostera japonica Dwarf eelgrass N.B. Bladder kelp (Nereocystis luetkeana) often washes up on the beach from deeper water where the bay meets Georgia Strait. Invertebrates in the Upper Subtidal Zone Latin name English Name 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 Hemigrapsus nudus Purple Shore Crab a l l w a y s Cancer productus Red Rock Crab o f t e n Cancer magister Dungeness Crab d d Pugettia gracilis Decorator Crab d Pugettia producta Kelp Crab d d Pagurus beringanus Bering Hermit Crab d d d d Pagurus granosimanus Grainyhand Hermit Crab d d Crangon stylirostris Smooth Bay Shrimp a l l w a y s Heptacarpus brevirostris Stout Shrimp a l l w a y s Heptacarpus sitchensis Sitka Shrimp a l l w a y s Idotea wosnesenskii Green Isopod1 a l l w a y s Pasiphaea pacifica Glass Shrimp a l l w a y s Caprella sp. -
A Comparative Intertidal Study and User Survey, Point Pinos, California
Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary A Comparative Intertidal Study and User Survey, Point Pinos, California July 31, 2003 Submitted to: Mr. Dennis Long, Executive Director Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation 299 Foam Street Monterey, CA 93940 Prepared and Submitted by: Environmental 225 Prado Rd., Suite D, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805.541.0310, FAX: 805.541.0421 Preface In April 2000, the City of Pacific Grove contracted with the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation (MBSF) to serve as the neutral fiscal sponsor for a project to study the impacts of human activities on the rocky intertidal shore and tidepools at Point Pinos. The City created a Point Pinos Tidepool Task Force Subcommittee on Research to develop and oversee the research project and interface with the MBSF. The Subcommittee members were appointed from numerous interested parties with differing views on potential impacts resulting from visitor use. The Subcommittee was responsible for: developing a Request for Proposals (RFP), distributing the RFP to solicit research proposals, and selecting a contractor based on proposed methods and qualifications. The Subcommittee was also responsible for approving the final and more detailed study plan submitted by the selected contractor, reviewing quarterly progress reports, and approving the final report on the project. The RFP, designed to address four primary questions concerning patterns of visitor use, activities, impacts, and past changes at Point Pinos, was circulated to the coastal and marine science communities for solicitation of proposals. Throughout the entire process of proposal review and contractor selection, including project implementation, the Subcommittee required that rigorous science be incorporated into the project plans. -
Gross 1 Grazing Pressure on Juvenile Nereocystis Luetkeana
Grazing pressure on juvenile Nereocystis luetkeana sporophytes: potential top-down effects of the majid crab Pugettia producta Collin P. Gross1, 2, Katie A. Dobkowski1, 2 Nearshore Ecology Research Experience 2013 Spring 2013 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 2 Friday Harbor LaBoratories, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA 98250 2 Friday Harbor LaBoratories, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA 98250 Contact information: Collin Gross University of Washington Department of Biology Box 315800 Seattle, WA 98195-1800 Keywords: bull kelp, Nereocystis luetkeana, crab, Pugettia producta, top-down control, grazing Gross 1 Abstract The range and distribution of Nereocystis luetkeana kelp forests in the San Juan Islands have changed in the past 100 years. Urchin removal experiments designed to test the paradigm of top-down control of kelp forests by urchins in the San Juan Channel showed no significant differences in macroalgal density or community composition after urchins were removed, suggesting that grazing by other invertebrates may control kelp populations. Few studies have been completed on the effects of grazing by crabs like Pugettia producta on kelp forest communities. A caging experiment was conducted over 15 days in the field to compare the grazing impacts of P. producta to those of mesograzers in the kelp forest canopy on juvenile Nereocystis sporophytes. Six types of blocks were suspended off the Friday Harbor Labs breakwater in triplicate. Kelps were attached to blocks with 1) two different closed cages with 13 mm and 50 mm mesh, 2) two different open cages with 13 mm and 50 mm mesh, 3) a 13 mm mesh cage with an individual P. -
655 Appendix G
APPENDIX G: GLOSSARY Appendix G-1. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Species Name. ....................................... G1-1 Appendix G-2. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Common Name.. .................................... G2-1 Appendix G-3. Invertebrate Species Alphabetized by Species Name.. .......................................... G3-1 Appendix G-4. Invertebrate Species Alphabetized by Common Name.. ........................................ G4-1 G-1 Appendix G-1. Demersal Fish Species Alphabetized by Species Name. Demersal fish species collected at depths of 2-484 m on the southern California shelf and upper slope, July-October 2008. Species Common Name Agonopsis sterletus southern spearnose poacher Anchoa compressa deepbody anchovy Anchoa delicatissima slough anchovy Anoplopoma fimbria sablefish Argyropelecus affinis slender hatchetfish Argyropelecus lychnus silver hachetfish Argyropelecus sladeni lowcrest hatchetfish Artedius notospilotus bonyhead sculpin Bathyagonus pentacanthus bigeye poacher Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Careproctus melanurus blacktail snailfish Ceratoscopelus townsendi dogtooth lampfish Cheilotrema saturnum black croaker Chilara taylori spotted cusk-eel Chitonotus pugetensis roughback sculpin Citharichthys fragilis Gulf sanddab Citharichthys sordidus Pacific sanddab Citharichthys stigmaeus speckled sanddab Citharichthys xanthostigma longfin sanddab Cymatogaster aggregata shiner perch Embiotoca jacksoni black perch Engraulis mordax northern anchovy Enophrys taurina bull sculpin Eopsetta jordani -
PISCO 'Mobile' Inverts 2017
PISCO ‘Mobile’ Inverts 2017 Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Patiria miniata (formerly Asterina miniata) Bat star, very abundant at many sites, highly variable in color and pattern. Typically has 5 rays, but can be found with more or less. Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Patiria miniata Bat star (formerly Asterina miniata) Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Juvenile Dermasterias imbricata Leather star Very smooth, five rays, mottled aboral surface Adult Dermasterias imbricata Leather star Very smooth, five rays, mottled aboral surface ©Lonhart Henricia spp. Blood stars Long, tapered rays, orange or red, patterned aboral surface looks like a series of overlapping ringlets. Usually 5 rays. Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Henricia spp. Blood star Long, tapered rays, orange or red, patterned aboral surface similar to ringlets. Usually 5 rays. (H. sanguinolenta?) Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Henricia spp. Blood star Long, tapered rays, orange or red, patterned aboral surface similar to ringlets. Usually 5 rays. Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Orthasterias koehleri Northern rainbow star Mottled red, orange and yellow, large, long thick rays Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Mediaster aequalis Orange star with five rays, large marginal plates, very flattened. Confused with Patiria miniata. Mediaster aequalis Orange star with five rays, large marginal plates, very flattened. Can be mistaken for Patiria miniata Pisaster brevispinus Short-spined star Large, pale pink in color, often on sand, thick rays Lonhart/SIMoN MBNMS NOAA Pisaster giganteus Giant-spined star Spines circled with blue ring, thick -
Northern Kelp Crab (Pugettia Producta)
Kelp Crabs Eat Kelp. And Lots Else? Katie Dobkowski*, Kasey Cordova, Declan Farr, Bryce O’Brien, Megan Dethier, Helen Berry Bull Kelp Forests – Ecologically Important Nearshore Habitats (Possible) Kelp Consumers Northern kelp crabs, Pugettia producta Photos courtesy of Dr. KenSe bens, Dr. Stephanie Crofts, and WSU Beachwatchers Laboratory Feeding Experiments “Buffet- Style” choice Feeding Experiments Controls n=7-11 n=7-11 (same as number of crabs to allow random pairing for adjustment) 1 2 1 2 s s # # i # # i t t a a a a g g g g l l l l cys cys a a a a o o o o r r r r c c c c Nereo Nereo Ma Ma Ma Ma P. producta elects to eat bull kelp over other species of macroalgae A) x B) 20 20 x 15 15 yy yy Adjusted Mass Lost (g) 10 10 5 5 0 0 NAS NUC C) D) x x 20 20 15 15 x y y yy Adjusted Mass Lost (g) 10 10 5 5 0 0 NUM N Sm Af Pugettia producta, the Northern Kelp Crab Nereocystis Alaria Saccharina Costaria Ulva Lacuna Bull Kelp Winged Kelp Sugar Kelp Seersucker Sea Lettuce Snail Organism photos courtesy of Sound Water Stewards Laboratory Feeding Experiments Choice and No Choice “Pairwise” Comparisons What crabs CAN eat: Paired What crabs CHOOSE to eat: No Choice Experiments Paired Choice Experiments Nereocystis stipe Nereocystis stipe Nereocystis blade Nereocystis blade Do kelp crab preferences vary with bull kelp life stage? Adults Only Juveniles Only a) Choice: p<0.00001 b) Choice, p=0.002 0.015 0.015 ab/hr) elp/g cr 0.010 0.010 eeding Rate (g k F * * 0.005 0.005 0.000 0.000 c) No Choice: p=0.002 d) No Choice, p=0.008 0.015 0.015 ab/hr) elp/g