Faster Enterprises Ltd Acn 604 113 206

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Faster Enterprises Ltd Acn 604 113 206 FASTER ENTERPRISES LTD ACN 604 113 206 SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS IMPORTANT INFORMATION This is a supplementary disclosure document (Supplementary Prospectus) dated 20 September 2016 that was lodged with ASIC on that date. The Supplementary Prospectus contains particulars of changes to, and supplements the replacement prospectus lodged with ASIC on 2 August 2016 (Replacement Prospectus) by Faster Enterprises Ltd (Company). This Supplementary Prospectus and the Replacement Prospectus are important documents that must be read in conjunction with each other. Investors should read both documents in full and are advised to consult with their professional advisers before deciding whether to apply for Shares under this Supplementary Prospectus or if they have any queries. This Supplementary Prospectus is a “refresh document” as defined in Section 724(3H) of the Corporations Act and has been lodged with ASIC in accordance with Section 724(3G) of the Corporations Act. ASIC, the ASX and their respective officers take no responsibility for the content of this Supplementary Prospectus or the merits of the investment to which this Supplementary Prospectus relates. Other than as set out in this Supplementary Prospectus, all details set out in the Replacement Prospectus remain unchanged. In the event of inconsistencies between the Supplementary Prospectus and the Replacement Prospectus, the Supplementary Prospectus prevails. The Company will send a copy of the Supplementary Prospectus to all Applicants that have applied for securities under the Replacement Prospectus as at the date of this Supplementary Prospectus. OBTAINING A COPY OF THIS PROSPECTUS For personal use only A paper copy of this Supplementary Prospectus and the Replacement Prospectus may be obtained free of charge from the Company by any person in Australia by calling +61 3 9897 4540 between 9.00am and 5.00pm (AEST), Monday to Friday during the Offer Period. FASTER ENTERPRISES LTD SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS (to be read with the Replacement Prospectus dated 2 August 2016) 1 An electronic copy of this Supplementary Prospectus (together with the Replacement Prospectus) are also available to Australian resident investors on the website, www.fasterenterprises.com.au. The distribution of this Supplementary Prospectus in jurisdictions outside Australia may be restricted by law and persons who come into possession of this Supplementary Prospectus should seek advice on and observe any of these restrictions. Failure to comply with these restrictions may violate applicable securities laws. Applications may only be made using the Application Form attached to a hard copy of this Supplementary Prospectus or on a printed copy of the electronic version downloaded in its entirety. The Corporations Act prohibits any person from passing the Application Form on to another person unless it is attached to, or accompanied by, this Supplementary Prospectus and the Replacement Prospectus in its paper copy form or the complete and unaltered electronic version of this Supplementary Prospectus (together with the Replacement Prospectus). DEFINED TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Terms defined in the Replacement Prospectus have the same meaning in this Supplementary Prospectus unless otherwise specifically stated. For personal use only FASTER ENTERPRISES LTD SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS (to be read with the Replacement Prospectus dated 2 August 2016) 2 1. SUMMARY – CONTENTS OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS 1.1 Purpose of the Supplementary Prospectus The Supplementary Prospectus has been prepared for the purposes of: amending Sections 1.8 and 2.13 of the Replacement Prospectus to reflect that the ASX will not impose mandatory escrow on any Shares; amending Sections 1.4 and 6.2 to reflect the changes in the risks associated with the ASX not imposing mandatory escrow on any Shares; “refreshing” the period for admission to quotation of Shares offered under the Replacement Prospectus so that the period will expire on the date which is 3 months after the date of this Supplementary Prospectus under section 724 of the Corporations Act; and “refreshing” the period for raising the minimum subscription under the Public Offer so that the period will expire on the date which is 4 months after the date of this Supplementary Prospectus under section 724 of the Corporations Act. 1.2 Background In accordance with the Corporations Act, if an entity offers securities under a disclosure document such as a prospectus and the disclosure document states or implies that those securities are to be admitted to quotation on the ASX, and those securities are not then admitted to quotation on the ASX within 3 months after the date of the relevant disclosure document (Quotation Condition), then the issue of those securities would be void and all subscription moneys received in respect of those securities must be returned to the relevant applicants or, alternatively, the applicants must be given a supplementary disclosure document and the opportunity to withdraw their application (see Section 2.1 below for further details). Additionally, in accordance with the Corporations Act, if an entity offers securities under a disclosure document such as a prospectus and that disclosure document states a minimum subscription amount must be raised before any securities will be issued (Minimum Subscription Condition), then the Minimum Subscription Condition must be satisfied within 4 months after the date of the disclosure document. If not, any subscription moneys received in respect of the securities must be returned to the relevant applicants or, alternatively, the applicants must be given a supplementary disclosure document and the opportunity to withdraw their application (see Section 2.1 below for further details). ASIC has varied the Corporations Act to allow companies to “refresh” the timing of the Minimum Subscription Condition and Quotation Condition under legislative instrument ASIC Corporations (Minimum Subscription and Quotation Conditions) Instrument 2016/70 (LI 2016/70), so that the respective 4 and 3 month periods re-commence from the date that a “refresh document” is lodged with ASIC, provided that the refresh document meets certain conditions (Refresh Conditions). For personal use only This Supplementary Prospectus addresses the relevant Refresh Conditions and it is the Company’s intention that this will effectively “refresh” the 3-month period relating to the Quotation Condition and the 4-month period relating to the Minimum Subscription Condition, such that the respective time periods will re-commence from the date this Supplementary Prospectus is lodged with ASIC. FASTER ENTERPRISES LTD SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS (to be read with the Replacement Prospectus dated 2 August 2016) 3 This Supplementary Prospectus also contains some additional updates since the lodgement date of the Replacement Prospectus. 2. SPECIFIC DISCLOSURES REQUIRED IN A “REFRESH DOCUMENT” Set out below are the specific disclosures required in a “refresh document” by LI 2016/70. 2.1 Withdrawal rights Any Applicant who, prior to the date of this Supplementary Prospectus, has lodged an Application for Shares offered under the Public Offer, the Debt to Equity Offer or the Noteholder Offer, will be issued a copy of this Supplementary Prospectus and has the right to withdraw their Application and be repaid their subscription moneys without interest, provided that their request to withdraw their Application is received by the Company within 1 calendar month after the date of this Supplementary Prospectus (Withdrawal Period) (i.e. on or before 20 October 2016). A request to withdraw an Application under the terms of this Section 2.1 of the Supplementary Prospectus should be in writing, signed by the Applicant and given to the Company using one of the same contact methods and details used for the Applications as set out in section 10.9 of the Replacement Prospectus. If you do not wish to withdraw your Application, you do not need to take any action. The Offers will remain open at least until the end of the Withdrawal Period (i.e. until 20 October 2016). 2.2 Applications received The Company advises that 174 Applications have been received as at the date of this Supplementary Prospectus, for a total of: 22,628,250 Shares under the Public Offer with a total value of $4,525,650 banked as cleared funds; 8,505,330 Shares under the Debt to Equity Offer; and 8,702,323 Shares under the Noteholder Offer.1 However, no Applications have been processed and no Shares have been issued under the Replacement Prospectus. 2.3 Minimum Subscription Condition At the date of this Supplementary Prospectus, the minimum subscription amount of $5,000,000 or 25,000,000 Shares under the Public Offer detailed in the Replacement Prospectus has not been achieved. This minimum subscription amount specified in the Replacement Prospectus remains unchanged at the date of this Supplementary Prospectus. No Shares have been issued under the Replacement Prospectus. Upon lodgement of this Supplementary Prospectus, and subject only to the lodgement of any future For personal use only refresh document, the Minimum Subscription Condition must be satisfied by no later than 20 January 2017 (being 4 months after the date of this Supplementary Prospectus). 1 The number of Shares to be issued under the Noteholder Offer will increase depending on the amount of interest capitalised in accordance with the terms of the Convertible Note Agreements. FASTER ENTERPRISES LTD SUPPLEMENTARY PROSPECTUS (to be read with the Replacement
Recommended publications
  • Carnegie Online Feedback – Raw Data
    GLEN EIRA CITY COUNCIL TRANSFORMING OUR NEIGHBOURHOODS TOGETHER CARNEGIE ONLINE FEEDBACK – RAW DATA BENTLEIGH BENTLEIGH EAST BRIGHTON EAST CARNEGIE CAULFIELD ELSTERNWICK GARDENVALE GLEN HUNTLY MCKINNON MURRUMBEENA ORMOND ST KILDA EAST ONLINE FEEDBACK – RAW DATA CONTENTS CARNEGIE RAW DATA ........................................................................................................................................ 3 SURVEY ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 VISION – ARE THERE ANY PARTS YOU WOULD CHANGE? .................................. 3 OBJECTIVES – IS THERE ANYTHING MISSING? ............................................................. 9 CONCEPT ONE ....................................................................................................................... 12 CONCEPT TWO ..................................................................................................................... 17 CONCEPT THREE ................................................................................................................... 21 FACEBOOK .............................................................................................................................................. 29 GLEN EIRA CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 CARNEGIE RAW DATA SURVEY VISION – ARE THERE ANY PARTS YOU WOULD CHANGE? I am not certain that I agree with an increase in overall parking. More focus should be on local residents accessing the area
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS on NOTICE Edition No. 64
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Edition No. 64 As at 25 February 2021 (Notice received 19 December 2018) 8924 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: In relation to conversion therapy: (1) How many complaints has the health commissioner had regarding conversion therapy and of those complaints — (a) how many related to psychological treatment; (b) how many related to pharmacological treatment; and (c) how many related to both psychological and pharmacological treatment. (Notice received 19 March 2019) 28525 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: How many paramedics in Victoria are employed, in total, in each of the 79 Local Government Areas. (Notice received 28 May 2019) 40925 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: How many staff from the North Richmond Community Health Centre have assisted with attending to people who have overdosed on drugs within the vicinity of the North Richmond Community Health Centre between — (a) 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018; (b) 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018; and (c) 1 January 2019 to 30 April 2019. (Notice received 13 August 2019) 630 MR DAVIS — To ask the Minister for Employment (for the Minister for Public Transport): In relation to the 2015-16 Bus Package which describes the deliverables of this project as ‘Victoria’s bus networks will be improved by adding more routes, expanding others, restoring cut services and fixing missing links in Melbourne’s growth areas’ on page 25 in the 2015-16 Budget Paper No. 3: (1) Could the Minister provide, expressed in table form — (a) the cut services that were restored in — (i) 2015-16; (ii) 2016-17; (iii) 2017-18; (iv) 2018-19; 25 February 2021 2 (b) the commencement date of each cut service that was restored; and (c) the output cost for each cut service restored, in the year it started and each successive year to 2018-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Envrionmental Audit Report
    INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS August 2007 VICTORIA’S AUDIT SYSTEM AUDIT REPORT CURRENCY An environmental audit system has operated in Audit reports are based on the conditions encountered Victoria since 1989. The Environment Protection Act and information reviewed at the time of preparation 1970 (the Act) provides for the appointment by the and do not represent any changes that may have Environment Protection Authority (EPA Victoria) of occurred since the date of completion. As it is not environmental auditors and the conduct of possible for an audit to present all data that could be independent, high quality and rigorous environmental of interest to all readers, consideration should be audits. made to any appendices or referenced documentation An environmental audit is an assessment of the for further information. condition of the environment, or the nature and extent When information regarding the condition of a site of harm (or risk of harm) posed by an industrial changes from that at the time an audit report is process or activity, waste, substance or noise. issued, or where an administrative or computation Environmental audit reports are prepared by EPA- error is identified, environmental audit reports, appointed environmental auditors who are highly certificates and statements may be withdrawn or qualified and skilled individuals. amended by an environmental auditor. Users are Under the Act, the function of an environmental advised to check EPA’s website to ensure the currency auditor is to conduct environmental audits and of the audit document. prepare environmental audit reports. Where an environmental audit is conducted to determine the PDF SEARCHABILITY AND PRINTING condition of a site or its suitability for certain uses, an environmental auditor may issue either a certificate or EPA Victoria can only certify the accuracy and statement of environmental audit.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting
    GLEN EIRA CITY COUNCIL ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY 11 JUNE 2019 MINUTES Meeting was held in the Council Chambers, Corner Hawthorn & Glen Eira Roads, Caulfield at 7.30pm Present The Mayor, Councillor Jamie Hyams Councillor Tony Athanasopoulos Councillor Anne-Marie Cade Councillor Clare Davey Councillor Mary Delahunty Councillor Dan Sztrajt ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 11 JUNE 2019 INDEX 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................... 4 3. OATH OF OFFICE AND DISCLOSURES OF INTERESTS ..................................... 4 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETINGS ................. 5 5. RECEPTION AND READING OF PETITIONS AND JOINT LETTERS .................... 5 5.1 Petition: Objection to the Safe Cycling Corridor Pilot ....................................... 5 6. DOCUMENTS FOR SEALING ................................................................................. 6 Nil 7. REPORTS BY DELEGATES APPOINTED BY COUNCIL TO VARIOUS ORGANISATIONS ................................................................................................... 6 8. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES ............................................................................ 6 8.1 Advisory Committees ................................................................................... 6 8.1.1 Advisory Committee Minutes ........................................................................... 6 8.2 Records of Assembly ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Unanswered Questions On
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Edition No. 60 As at 13 November 2020 (Notice received 19 December 2018) 8924 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: In relation to conversion therapy: (1) How many complaints has the health commissioner had regarding conversion therapy and of those complaints — (a) how many related to psychological treatment; (b) how many related to pharmacological treatment; and (c) how many related to both psychological and pharmacological treatment. (Notice received 19 March 2019) 28525 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: How many paramedics in Victoria are employed, in total, in each of the 79 Local Government Areas. (Notice received 28 May 2019) 40925 MS CROZIER — To ask the Minister for Health: How many staff from the North Richmond Community Health Centre have assisted with attending to people who have overdosed on drugs within the vicinity of the North Richmond Community Health Centre between — (a) 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018; (b) 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018; and (c) 1 January 2019 to 30 April 2019. (Notice received 13 August 2019) 630 MR DAVIS — To ask the Minister for Employment (for the Minister for Public Transport): In relation to the 2015-16 Bus Package which describes the deliverables of this project as ‘Victoria’s bus networks will be improved by adding more routes, expanding others, restoring cut services and fixing missing links in Melbourne’s growth areas’ on page 25 in the 2015-16 Budget Paper No. 3: (1) Could the Minister provide, expressed in table form — (a) the cut services that were restored in — (i) 2015-16; (ii) 2016-17; (iii) 2017-18; (iv) 2018-19; 13 November 2020 2 (b) the commencement date of each cut service that was restored; and (c) the output cost for each cut service restored, in the year it started and each successive year to 2018-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Eira Heritage Review of Bentleigh and Carnegie Structure Plan Areas (Commercial) 2018 Stage 2 Report
    Centre Road, Bentleigh Koornang Road, Carnegie Glen Eira Heritage Review of Bentleigh and Carnegie Structure Plan Areas (Commercial) 2018 Stage 2 Report City of Glen Eira RBA ARCHITECTS + CONSERVATION CONSULTANTS P T Y L T D FITZROY STREET 4 C / 1 7 1 ST KILDA VIC AUSTRALIA 3182 +613 9525 5666 TEL +613 9525 4906 FAX [email protected] EMAIL www.rbaarchitects.com.au WEB TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Brief 1 1.3 Project Structure 2 1.4 Phase One – Commercial Areas 3 1.5 Background 3 1.6 Study Team 4 1.7 Acknowledgements 4 2 Methodology 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Site Inspections 5 2.3 Research 5 2.4 Assessment of Significance 6 2.5 Citation Format 7 3 Stage One 3.1 Overview 8 3.2 Findings 8 4 Stage Two 4.1 Findings 10 4.2 Bentleigh 10 4.3 Carnegie 12 Appendix Citations Glen Eira Heritage Review of Bentleigh and Carnegie Structure Plan Areas (Commercial) 2018 Report 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview This report relating to Phase One, Stage Two of the Glen Eira Heritage Review – Bentleigh & Carnegie Structure Plan Areas (Commercial), has been prepared by RBA Architects + Conservation Consultants for the City of Glen Eira. It provides citations for ten recommended (nine new and one revised) heritage places, both precincts and individual sites, within the commercial zones of the Bentleigh and Carnegie Structure Plan areas. The residential parts of these Structure Plan areas will be the subject of review during Phase Two of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity-In-Glen-Eira-2018.Pdf
    Biosphere Pty Ltd ABN 28 097 295 504 Version 1.1, 7 February 2018 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 2 2. THE IMPORTANCE OF NATURE AND BIODIVERSITY ..................... 4 3. THE STUDY APPROACH ........................................................... 5 3.1 Survey of Literature and Pre-existing Information .......... 5 3.2 Fieldwork ....................................................................... 6 4. GLEN EIRA’S VEGETATION PRIOR TO COLONISATION ................. 8 5. WILD PLANT SPECIES ............................................................ 10 5.1 Indigenous Plants ......................................................... 10 5.2 Significant Trees .......................................................... 11 5.3 Non-indigenous Plants.................................................. 12 6. FAUNA AND HABITAT ............................................................. 13 6.1 Fauna Species ............................................................... 13 6.2 Habitat Features ........................................................... 14 7. HOTSPOTS FOR INDIGENOUS FLORA AND FAUNA ..................... 16 7.1 Sandringham Railway Line Verge, Elsternwick ............ 17 7.2 Rippon Lea Lake and Surrounds ................................... 22 7.3 Caulfield Park .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting to the Future
    CONNECTING TO THE FUTURE The Alternative to the Victorian Transport Plan Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 2 Victoria’s Transport Crisis.................................................................................................3 2.1 Responding to Traffic Congestion.............................................................................3 2.2 Victoria’s Freeway Fetish: From CityLink to ‘Missing Link’...................................5 2.3 Climate Change and Transport ..................................................................................8 2.4 Petrol Prices and Peak Oil........................................................................................11 2.5 A Rail Capacity Crisis?............................................................................................13 3 Distractions and Blind Alleys: Why the Crisis Continues...............................................21 3.1 Urban Myths From the Road Lobby........................................................................21 3.2 The Sorry Legacy of Privatisation ...........................................................................23 3.3 Melbourne 2030 and ‘MOTC’: Action Through Inaction .......................................25 3.4 Eddington and the VTP: Back to the Future............................................................29 4 The Solution: Learning From Experience........................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Form Analysis CARNEGIE
    Urban Form Analysis CARNEGIE December 2018 Page | 0 Contents Report Appendices 1. Introduction Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Existing Context Review Commercial and mixed use areas Residential Precincts 2. Existing context Appendix A outlines the existing context for Appendix B outlines the key design aspects Appendix C outlines the key design aspects 3. Design response the activity centre in relation to built form. that influenced proposed controls for that influenced proposed controls for Discussion is separated into four parts: commercial and mixed use areas. residential areas. Discussion is separated 4. Recommendations Discussion is separated into nine parts: into three parts: A1. Strategic city context 4.1 Summary B1. Summary (design approach) C1. Summary (design approach and A2. Glen Eira Planning Scheme recommendations) 4.2 Commercial and mixed use areas B2. Active streets and laneways A3. Land analysis C2. Key preferred character outcomes 4.3 Residential areas B3. Supporting employment by design A4. Built form and character analysis C3. Impact on development B4. Street wall height and design opportunity (housing yield) B5. Setbacks above the street wall B6. Building height B7. Building separation, outlook and privacy B8. Responding to sensitive Interfaces B9. Shadow protection Page | 1 1. Introduction Purpose Study Area This report documents the built form The report reviews land within the suburb of elements of the Carnegie Structure Plan Carnegie identified as the Carnegie 2018-2031, seeking to: Activity Centre study area (see map). Consolidate and document all The study area is located in the City of Glen background research, analysis and Eira and approximately 11km from the central business district of metropolitan recommendations that inform the built form aspects of the Structure Plan.
    [Show full text]