DOCSLIB.ORG

RICHARD SCHECHNER and the Perforl^IANCE GROUP: a STUDY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RICHARD SCHECHNER and the Perforl^IANCE GROUP: a STUDY RICHARD SCHECHNER AND THE PERFORl^IANCE GROUP: A STUDY OF ACTING TECHNIQUE AND METHODOLOGY by ESTHER SUNDELL LICHTI, B.A., A.M. A DISSERTATION IN THEATRE ARTS Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1986 ego r3 copyright 1986 Esther Sundell Lichti T'3 C^^^» -^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to Professor Richard A. Weaver and to the other members of my committee. Professors Clifford A. Ashby, Michael C. Gerlach, Daniel 0. Nathan, and Steven Paxton, for their encouragement and helpful criticism. I would also like to thank Richard Schechner for his time and generosity. This study was funded in part by the Paul Whitfield Horn Fellowship made possible by the Texas Tech University Women's Club and the University Quarterly Club. Finally, I am grateful for the love and support I have received from my fellow students, my friends, and my family. Ill ABSTRACT The social and cultural upheaval of the 1960s spawned a wide range of "alternative" theatre companies concerned with finding a solution to what they perceived as the imminent death of theatre in the United States. The Performance Group, under the direction of Richard Schechner, proved one of the most important. The study is presented in three sections. Section one sets forth the history of TPG, the theory of environmental theatre, and a study of influences upon the company's work. Section two examines the productions Dionysus in 69, Makbeth, and Commune with regard to their development from the inital idea through performance, including descriptions of the physical environments, acting problems, and performance methodology. The concluding section summarizes TPG's actor training and performance methods, the role of the actor in the mise-en-scene, and unique problems arising from the basic theories of environmental theatre. It studies the changing definition of the actor's role in theatre and explores the contribution that TPG's work can make to contemporary developments in actor training. TPG pioneered a style of performance that emphasized the actor as the central figure in the creative theatrical IV process, working within an environmental design that merged audience and performance spaces. In the course of their productions, the company developed a system of actor train­ ing which drew upon numerous antecedents in theatre, social science, music, dance, and visual art. They created a meth­ odology concerned with mastery of the actor's physical and vocal instrument, self-referentiality, and heightened commu­ nication among actors and between actors and audience. Their training process provides a means of dealing with many of the problems which face actors working in the contempo­ rary theatre. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 111 ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THE HISTORY OF THE PERFORMANCE GROUP 12 III. RICHARD SCHECHNER AND ENVIRONMENTAL THEATRE 34 Environmental Theatre 39 IV. INFLUENCES 50 Theatre 51 Stanislavski 51 Meyerhold 54 Brecht 58 Artaud 62 Grotowski 65 lonesco 69 Oriental Theatre 71 The Contemporary Theatre Avant-Garde 74 Social Science 78 R.D. Laing 79 Encounter Groups 81 Gestalt Therapy 83 Transactional Analysis 85 Erving Goffman 87 Claude Levi-Strauss 89 Mircea Eliade 90 The Other Arts 92 John Cage 92 Merce Cunningham and Ann Halprin 95 Visual Art and the Happening 97 V. DIONYSUS IN 69 103 VI VI. MAKBETH 124 VII. COMMUNE 140 VIII. ACTOR TRAINING AND METHODOLOGY 155 The Training Process 155 The Actor's Role in the Mise-en-scene 172 Specific Problems for the Actor :- 179 IX. CONCLUSION 189 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 196 Books 196 Articles 202 Other Sources 204 VI 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The social and cultural upheaval of the 1960s spawned a wide range of theatre companies concerned with finding a solution to what they perceived as the imminent death of theatre in the United States. Many factors motivated these "alternative" theatre groups: a desire to circumvent the economic forces which kept production costs soaring while ticket sales declined, the wish to experiment with accepted ways of acting, directing, and designing, and the need to expand the boundaries of theatre by exploring nonverbal communication and abstract realities in the hope of creating a new kind of performance that would rejuvenate what they saw as a stagnating art form. Among these companies, the ensemble groups such as The Living Theatre, The Open Theatre, and The Performance Group raised the greatest controversy and attracted the most attention. Founded in 1967 and continuing until 1980, The Performance Group under the direction of Richard Schechner proved one of the most enduring of these companies, as well as one of the most innovative. Richard Schechner and The Performance Group (referred to from now on as TPG) pioneered a style of performance that 2 emphasized the actor as the central figure in the creative / process of theatrical work. Instead of having the actor serve as an interpreter for the playwright's words and ideas, filtered through the director's viewpoint, TPG sought to heighten the actor's freedom of choice and allow him to reveal to the audience the person behind the character mask. They strove to create a situation where both actor and audi­ ence were part of the performance so that it became impossi­ ble for the spectator to withdraw and view the theatrical reality objectively, as separate from the "real" world of his everyday existence. Richard Schechner and TPG sought to make the site of each production an integral part of the work, which encom­ passed both acting and audience areas in one space. Accord­ ing to Schechner, in typical western theatre, the audience sits passively, in a darkened auditorium, separated from the performers by brilliant lights and scenic pieces. Informa­ tion flows from the stage to the audience, but the actors receive limited feedback. The audience has a single focus, chosen for them by the director. The play appeals to the audience member's intellect, allowing him to hold himself aloof from what the actors are experiencing onstage. In Schechner's environmental theatre, however, the multiple and variable focus forces each audience member to choose for himself what to watch. Since the actors and audience are within a single space, everyone is equally aware of everyone else. The rest of the audience becomes part of the perform­ ance that each individual audience member perceives. By providing no separate space to which the viewer may with­ draw, the environment forces him into participating in the experience the production creates. He may choose to deny the experience, but he cannot avoid it. He cannot remain passive. This allows the audience member options ranging from leaving the theatre entirely to joining the performers and participating in the production. Environmental theatre necessitates a contact between performer and audience member that demands an unusual degree of personal commitment from the actor. Richard Schechner and TPG felt that such a commitment created specific needs in the area of actor training that were not being met by ex­ isting methods. Although they studied the techniques of emotion and sense memory, the company realized that these alone were not enough to allow the actor to communicate ful­ ly. Training of the performer's entire instrument, body, voice, and mind, must be emphasized. The company investigated the phenomenon of communication on three separate levels: within the actor himself, within the acting company, and between actor and audience. They sought ways to multiply the means by which information and experience could be passed from person to person, so the theatrical event would be heightened for all participants. Richard Schechner's vision of theatre has had a major influence on contemporary American theatre. In his work with TPG, Schechner synthesized the work of Jerzy Grotowski, one of the foremost theatre theorists of this century, and attempted to apply those principles with actors trained in realistic acting techniques. He explored the positions of ritual and myth in theatre, experimented with the possiblity of the actor functioning as a shamanistic figure, and intro­ duced the concept of theatre as a social science. Schechner's work made it possible to examine and measure theatrical interactions objectively, creating in turn the opportunity to manipulate them by experimental means to achieve a stated goal: the revitalization of theatre through the creation of an authentic experience for the audience. Although Schechner's work had a profound impact on oth­ er experimental theatre groups, a search of the literature reveals that no major work on Richard Schechner and TPG has been written, except by Schechner himself. His first book. Public Domain (1969) is a collection of essays and includes work on Happenings, Environmental Theatre, and the use of communal events as a basis for theatre. It also contains an essay on The Bacchae, the play which provided a starting point for Dionysus in 69. Environmental Theatre (1973) doc­ uments the growth of TPG and expands on the theories and techniques upon which the concept of Environmental Theatre was based. Dionysus in 69, compiled by members of TPG and edited by Schechner, describes the creation and production of the play and includes many enlightening photographs. Theatres, Spaces, and Environments (1976), co-authored with Brooks MacNamara and Jerry Rojo, contains detailed descrip­ tions of the environments for the three productions under study and essays on environmental design and its historical antecedents. Essays in Performance Theory (1977), explores Schechner's studies of theatre as a social science and its relationship to sociology and anthropology. Since 1977, Schechner has published several more books, but his studies have led him away from the area of Environmental Theatre, and the later works have little to offer this study. In addition to his books, Richard Schechner published articles in numerous periodicals in the disciplines of the fine arts and the social sciences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stage Violence, Power and the Director an Examination
    STAGE VIOLENCE, POWER AND THE DIRECTOR AN EXAMINATION OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CRUELTY FROM ANTONIN ARTAUD TO SARAH KANE by Jordan Matthew Walsh Bachelor of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Pittsburgh in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy. The University of Pittsburgh May 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ARTS & SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Jordan Matthew Walsh It was defended on April 13th, 2012 and approved by Jesse Berger, Artistic Director, Red Bull Theater Company Cynthia Croot, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department Annmarie Duggan, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department Dr. Lisa Jackson-Schebetta, Assistant Professor, Theatre Arts Department 2 Copyright © by Jordan Matthew Walsh 2012 3 STAGE VIOLENCE AND POWER: AN EXAMINATION OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF CRUELTY FROM ANTONIN ARTAUD TO SARAH KANE Jordan Matthew Walsh, BPhil University of Pittsburgh, 2012 This exploration of stage violence is aimed at grappling with the moral, theoretical and practical difficulties of staging acts of extreme violence on stage and, consequently, with the impact that these representations have on actors and audience. My hypothesis is as follows: an act of violence enacted on stage and viewed by an audience can act as a catalyst for the coming together of that audience in defense of humanity, a togetherness in the act of defying the truth mimicked by the theatrical violence represented on stage, which has the potential to stir the latent power of the theatre communion. I have used the theoretical work of Antonin Artaud, especially his “Theatre of Cruelty,” and the works of Peter Brook, Jerzy Grotowski, and Sarah Kane in conversation with Artaud’s theories as a prism through which to investigate my hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Siemund
    Veranstalter: Dennis Büscher-Ulbrich Off-Off-Broadway and Beyond: Experimental Theatre Thema: and Avant-Garde Performance 1945–1970 [AA-A3, ENG-7, AA-W] Art der Veranstaltung: Seminar Ib Veranstaltungsnummer: 53-561 Zeit: Mo 18-20 Raum: Phil 1269 Beginn: 17. Oktober 2011 Course Description: The early developing OFF-OFF- BROADWAY MOVEMENT of the 1950s and 1960s sought freedom from the various constraints — aesthetically and otherwise — of conventional theatre. Mainstream theatre at the time was dominated by the musical and the psycho- logical drama, spawning pro- ductions that were conceived as business ventures and, if successful, packaged and toured. The notion of theatre as a packaged commodity offended the avant-garde sensibilities of artists who observed the psycho- logical and physical constraints built within the theatrical space itself. Instead, they enthusi- astically turned to alternative sites and experimental forms, eventually collapsing the dis- tinction between theatre and PERFORMANCE ART. While con- ventional theatre taught the spectator to lose herself in the fictional onstage time, space, and characters, avant-garde theatre and performance relied on the spectator’s complete consciousness of the present, i.e. the real time and space shared by audience and performers. The primary importance of the spectator’s consciousness of the present is that she is an active force in creating the theatrical event rather than a passive observer of a ready-made production. To approach this phenomenon, we will be looking closely at three significant avant-garde moments in postwar American theatre and performance: THE LIVING THEATRE, HAPPENINGS/FLUXUS, and the BLACK ARTS MOVEMENT. We will analyze and discuss experimental plays that still work within the confines of theatrical space, like The Connection (1959) and Dutchman (1964), semi-improvisational and interactive plays, like Paradise Now (1967), as well as Happenings and other ‘far-out’ performances.
    [Show full text]
  • Blurred Lines Between Role and Reality: a Phenomenological Study of Acting
    Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2019 Blurred Lines Between Role and Reality: A Phenomenological Study of Acting Gregory Hyppolyte Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the Psychology Commons BLURRED LINES BETWEEN ROLE AND REALITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF ACTING A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY In CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY by GREGORY HIPPOLYTE BROWN August 2019 This dissertation, by Gregory Hippolyte Brown, has been approved by the committee members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: _________________________ Brett Kia-Keating, Ed.D. Chairperson __________________________ Sharleen O‘ Brien, Ph.D. Second Faculty __________________________ Thalia R. Goldstein, Ph.D. External Expert ii Copyright © 2019 Gregory Hippolyte Brown iii Abstract When an actor plays a character in a film, they try to connect with the emotions and behavioral patterns of the scripted character. There is an absence of literature regarding how a role influences an actor’s life before, during, and after film production. This study examined how acting roles might influence an actor during times on set shooting a movie or television series as well as their personal life after the filming is finished. Additionally the study considered the psychological impact of embodying a role, and whether or not an actor ever has the feeling that the performed character has independent agency over the actor.
    [Show full text]
  • An Artaudian and Brechtian Analysis of the Living Theatre's the Brig
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto An Artaudian and Brechtian Analysis of The Living Theatre’s The Brig: A Study of Contradictory Theories in Practice On a January evening in 1963 the stage director Julian Beck received a play entitled The Brig and immediately decided that it would be the next production his avant-garde troupe, The Living Theatre, was to produce. Written by Kenneth Brown, The Brig is a semi-autobiographical account of Brown’s harrowing experience in a Marine Corps prison while he was stationed at Mt. Fujiyama in Japan between 1954-1957.1 The production opened on May 15, 1963 under the direction of Beck’s wife and company co- founder, Judith Malina, and would ultimately become a signature work in The Living Theatre’s repertoire. Theatre critics readily recognized the piece’s use of a highly visceral and emotionally engaging theatrical form in dialectic conjunction with a socio/political content that attacked society’s various systems of hierarchical authority. New York Newsday described the performance as, “Shattering! Picasso’s Guernica or a Hiroronymous Bosch painting come to life,” while Variety magazine pointed out that it was “written with relentless fury…a searing indictment of man’s inhumanity to man.” The acclaimed theatre academic Robert Brustein perhaps captured the evening best when he wrote: An activist play designed to arouse responsibility…This ruthless documentary becomes an act of conscience, decency, and moral revolt in the midst of apathy and mass inertia. If you can spend a night in THE BRIG, you may start a jailbreak of your own.2 The Brig left its mark on the American theatre, as it was seminal in the development of the New York City avant-garde of the 1960s, and demonstrated The Living Theatre’s effective use of experimental performance as a source of political action.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Acting
    096-157 CH04-861627 12/4/03 12:01 AM Page 96 CHAPTER ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ ᪴ 4 Acting No role is too small. In this scene from Julius Caesar, the varied responses of the crowd members to Caesar’s death give the scene more depth. One can see Mark Antony, played by Al Pacino, judging the crowd’s mood and planning how to manipulate it. cting is a question of absorbing other Apeople’s personalities and adding some of our own experience. —PAUL NEWMAN, ACTOR 96 096-157 CH04-861627 12/4/03 12:02 AM Page 97 SETTING THE SCENE Focus Questions What special terminology is used in acting? What are the different types of roles? How do you create a character? What does it mean to act? Vocabulary emotional or straight parts master gesture subjective acting character parts inflection technical or objective acting characterization subtext leading roles primary source substitution protagonist secondary sources improvisation antagonist body language paraphrasing supporting roles So now you’re ready to act! For most students of drama, this is the moment you have been waiting for. You probably share the dream of every actor to create a role so convincing that the audience totally accepts your character as real, for- getting that you are only an actor playing a part. You must work hard to be an effective actor, but acting should never be so real that the audience loses the theatrical illu- sion of reality. Theater is not life, and acting is not life. Both are illusions that are larger than life.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Dance? in 3 Dances, Gene Friedman Attempts to Answer Just That, by Presenting Various Forms of Movement. the Film Is D
    GENE FRIEDMAN 3 Dances What is a dance? In 3 Dances, Gene Friedman attempts to answer just that, by presenting various forms of movement. The film is divided into three sections: “Public” opens with a wide aerial shot of The Museum of Modern Art’s Sculpture Garden and visitors walking about; “Party,” filmed in the basement of Judson Memorial Church, features the artists Alex Hay, Deborah Hay, Robert Rauschenberg, and Steve Paxton dancing the twist and other social dances; and “Private” shows the dancer Judith Dunn warming up and rehearsing in her loft studio, accompanied by an atonal vocal score. The three “dances” encompass the range of movement employed by the artists, musicians, and choreographers associated with Judson Dance Theater. With its overlaid exposures, calibrated framing, and pairing of distinct actions, Friedman’s film captures the group’s feverish spirit. WORKSHOPS In the late 1950s and early 1960s, three educational sites were formative for the group of artists who would go on to establish Judson Dance Theater. Through inexpensive workshops and composition classes, these artists explored and developed new approaches to art making that emphasized mutual aid and art’s relationship to its surroundings. The choreographer Anna Halprin used improvisation and simple tasks to encourage her students “to deal with ourselves as people, not dancers.” Her classes took place at her home outside San Francisco, on her Dance Deck, an open-air wood platform surrounded by redwood trees that she prompted her students to use as inspiration. In New York, near Judson Memorial Church, the ballet dancer James Waring taught a class in composition that brought together different elements of a theatrical performance, much like a collage.
    [Show full text]
  • Editors' Preface Introduction
    Notes Editors’ Preface 1. Carey, Susan. The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 4. 2. See Zunshine, Lisa. “What is Cognitive Cultural Studies?” Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Ed. Lisa Zunshine. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1. Introduction 1. Deborah Mayo, Interview with John Lutterbie, Stony Brook University, tape recording, July 3, 2003. 2. Ibid. 3. Margarita Espada, Interview with John Lutterbie, Stony Brook University, tape recording, June 30, 2003. 4. Ibid. 5. Ibid. 6. Margarita Espada, Interview with John Lutterbie, Stony Brook University, tape recording, February 4, 2002. 7. I bid. 8. Deborah Mayo, Interview with John Lutterbie, Stony Brook University, tape recording, December 5, 2001. 9. Ibid. 10. Ibid. 11. Deborah Mayo, Interview with John Lutterbie, Stony Brook University, tape recording, November 7, 2001. 12. See Patrice Pavis, Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture (London and New York: Routledge, 1991), 178–209. 13. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Stuart E. Dreyfus. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (New York: Free Press, 1986), 50. 14. Ibid., 30. 15. Ibid., 30–31. 16. Neil Young, “Harvest Moon.” http://www.lyricsfreak.com/n /neil+young/harvest+moon_20099104.html. March 14, 2011 234 NOTES 1 The Language of Acting 1. I saw an Irish dance performance in which a fiddler was given a standing ovation despite the obvious fact that the instrument had no strings . 2. See Helga Noice and Tony Noice. “Two Approaches to Learning a Theatrical Script.” Memory. 4, no. 1 (1996): 1–17; and Helga Noice and Tony Noice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Teresa de Lauretis Futurism: A Postmodern View* The importance of Modernism and of the artistic movements of the first twenty or so years of this century need not be stressed. It is now widely acknowledged that the "historical avant-garde" was the crucible for most of the art forms and theories of art that made up the contemporary esthetic climate. This is evidenced, more than by the recently coined academic terms "neoavanguardia" and "postmodernism," 1 by objective trends in the culture of the last two decades: the demand for closer ties between artistic perfor- mance and real-life interaction, which presupposes a view of art as social communicative behavior; the antitraditionalist thrust toward interdisciplinary or even non-disciplinary academic curri- cula; the experimental character of all artistic production; the increased awareness of the material qualities of art and its depen- dence on physical and technological possibilities, on the one hand; on the other, its dependence on social conventions or semiotic codes that can be exposed, broken, rearranged, transformed. I think we can agree that the multi-directional thrust of the arts and their expansion to the social and the pragmatic domain, the attempts to break down distinctions between highbrow and popular art, the widening of the esthetic sphere to encompass an unprecedented range of phenomena, the sense of fast, continual movement in the culture, of rapid obsolescence and a potential transformability of forms are issues characteristic of our time. Many were already implicit, often explicit, in the project of the historical avant-garde. But whereas this connection has been established and pursued for Surrealism and Dada, for example, Italian Futurism has remained rather peripheral in the current reassessment; indeed one could say that it has been marginalized and effectively ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehearsing Emotions the Process of Creating a Role for the Stage
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS Stockholm Studies in Sociology New series 45 Rehearsing Emotions The Process of Creating a Role for the Stage Stina Bergman Blix ©Stina Bergman Blix and Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm 2010 ISSN 0491-0885 ISBN 978-91-86071-41-7 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2010 Distributor: eddy.se ab, Visby, Sweden Front cover photos: To the left: An actor displaying grief by G.B. Duchenne, taken from “The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals” by Charles Darwin (1872), reproduced by Jens Östman. To the right: An actor displaying grief © Stina Bergman Blix. In memory of my beloved sister Clara Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................... xi Introduction ..................................................................................................1 1. Stage Actors, Roles and Emotions......................................................7 Dramaturgical Theory .................................................................................................7 Playing and Playing at ...........................................................................................8 The Relationship between Actor and Character ............................................10 Emotion Work in Role Playing............................................................................12 Double Agency ......................................................................................................19 Emotion Theory..........................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Theory
    Performance Theory “Reading Performance Theory by Richard Schechner again, three decades after its first edition, is like meeting an old friend and finding out how much of him/her has been with you all along this way.” Augusto Boal “It is an indispensable text in all aspects of the new discipline of Performance Studies. It is in many ways an eye-opener par- ticularly in its linkage of theater to other performance genres.” Ngu˜ gı˜ wa Thiong’o, University of California “Richard Schechner has defined the parameters of con- temporary performance with an originality and insight that make him indispensable to contemporary theatrical thought. For many years, both scholars and artists have been inspired by his unique and powerful perspective.” Richard Foreman “Schechner has a place in every theater history textbook for his ground-breaking work in environmental theater in the 1960s and 1970s and for his vision in helping to found the discipline of performance studies.” Rebecca Schneider “Richard Schechner is the master teacher and the master conversant on the transformative power of performance to both performer and spectator, at its deepest level. Perform- ance Theory is the essential book which brilliantly illuminates the world as a performance space on stage and off.” Anna Deveare Smith A highlands Papua New Guinea man takes a break from dancing (see chapter 4, “From ritual to theater and back: the efficacy– entertainment braid”). Richard Schechner Performance Theory Revised and expanded edition, with a new preface by the author London and New York Essays on Performance Theory published 1977 by Ralph Pine, for Drama School Specialists Second edition first published 1988 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 First published in the United Kingdom 1988 by Routledge First published in Routledge Classics 2003 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre's 1923 And
    CULTURAL EXCHANGE: THE ROLE OF STANISLAVSKY AND THE MOSCOW ART THEATRE’S 1923 AND1924 AMERICAN TOURS Cassandra M. Brooks, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2014 APPROVED: Olga Velikanova, Major Professor Richard Golden, Committee Member Guy Chet, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Brooks, Cassandra M. Cultural Exchange: The Role of Stanislavsky and the Moscow Art Theatre’s 1923 and 1924 American Tours. Master of Arts (History), August 2014, 105 pp., bibliography, 43 titles. The following is a historical analysis on the Moscow Art Theatre’s (MAT) tours to the United States in 1923 and 1924, and the developments and changes that occurred in Russian and American theatre cultures as a result of those visits. Konstantin Stanislavsky, the MAT’s co-founder and director, developed the System as a new tool used to help train actors—it provided techniques employed to develop their craft and get into character. This would drastically change modern acting in Russia, the United States and throughout the world. The MAT’s first (January 2, 1923 – June 7, 1923) and second (November 23, 1923 – May 24, 1924) tours provided a vehicle for the transmission of the System. In addition, the tour itself impacted the culture of the countries involved. Thus far, the implications of the 1923 and 1924 tours have been ignored by the historians, and have mostly been briefly discussed by the theatre professionals. This thesis fills the gap in historical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Golf
    WOMEN IN GOLF T HE P LAYERS, THE H ISTORY, AND THE F UTURE OF THE SPORT DAVID L. HUDSON,JR . Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hudson, David L., 1969– Women in golf : the players, the history, and the future of the sport / David L. Hudson, Jr. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–0–275–99784–7 (alk. paper) 1. Golf for women—United States. 2. Women golfers—United States—Biography 3. Sex discrimination in sports—United States. 4. Ladies Professional Golf Association. I. Title. GV966.H83 2008 796.3520922—dc22 2007030424 [B] British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2008 by David L. Hudson, Jr. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2007030424 ISBN: 978–0–275–99784–7 First published in 2008 Praeger Publishers, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.praeger.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48-1984). 10987654321 To the memory of my beloved grandmother, Rose Kostadin Krusa, who loved the great game of golf with all of her beautiful soul and spirit. C ONTENTS Acknowledgments ix 1. Golf’s Origins 1 2. Early Greats of the Game 9 3. Joyce Wethered—The Greatest Female Golfer Ever 19 4. The Babe and the Berg...and Louise Suggs 29 5.
    [Show full text]