DOCSLIB.ORG

LYCEN 7112 Février 1972 Notice 92Ft on the Generalized Exchange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LYCEN 7112 Février 1972 Notice 92Ft on the Generalized Exchange LYCEN 7112 Février 1972 notice 92ft On the Generalized Exchange Operators for SU(n) A. Partensky Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Université Claude Bernard de Lyon Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules 43, Bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69-Villeurbanne, France Abstract - By following the work of Biedenharn we have redefined the k-particles generalized exchange operators (g.e.o) and studied their properties. By a straightforward but cur-jersome calculation we have derived the expression, in terms of the SU(n) Casimir operators, of the ?., 3 or 4 particles g.e.o. acting on the A-particles states which span an irreducible representation of the grown SU(n). A striking and interesting result is that the eigenvalues of each of these g.e.o. do not depend on the n in SU(n) but only on the Young pattern associated with the irreducible representation considered. For a given g.e.o. , the eigenvalues corresponding to two conjugate Young patterns are the same except for the sign which depends on the parity of the g.e.o. considered. Three Appendices deal with some related problems and, more specifically, Appendix C 2 contains a method of obtaining the eigenvalues of Gel'fand invariants in a new and simple way. 1 . Introduction The interest attributed by physicists to the Lie groups has 3-4 been continuously growing since the pionner works of Weyl , Wigner and Racah • In particular, unitary groups have been used successfully in various domains of physics, although the physical reasons for their introduction have not always been completely explained. The use of unitary groups in physicsl problems, has in turn given rise to a lot of works devoted to the study of these groups considered as entities . In this paper, we shall use the group U(n) to define, to investigate the properties of and to calculate the eigen­ values of the so-called generalized exchange operators (g.e.o.). This research opening was suggested by Biedenharn , who defined a g.e.o. P^ ' 2" '* k £Qr k particles and relative to U(n) as an extension of the two particles exchange operator. The two particles exchange operator has proved to be very useful in Nuclear Physics. 8 (cf. the spin exchange operator or Bartlett forces , the space 9 exchange operator or Majorana forces , and the charge exchange operator or Heisenberg potential ). These two particles exchange operators are a simple transcription of two-body forces. In a • similar way, the k-particles g.e.o. (k > 2) derive from k-body forces. For a long time, the existence of many-body forces among : 11 12 nucléons has been postulated . Recently, some papers have been devoted to 3-body forces in an attempt to define their importance 13 relative to 2-body forces and William G. Harter using Young tableau, derived sum rules for k-body operator spectra. I The material will be organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we • study the properties of the g.e.o.1 P. * Z'" k defined in a 1 I somewhat different manner to the one of Biedenharn . In Sec. 3, ] A "' we extend this definition to produce an operator P for A-particles J A A i • (A >k). Sec. 4 is devoted to the three particular cases P, , P '|j A AAA I and P. By a direct derivation,we get P? , P and P. as !j functions of the invariant operators for SU(h). Foi: each of the :* AAA 4 operators P , P and P. , we then obtain the eigenvalues | relative to an A-particles state which carries an irreducible repre- I sentation of SU(n). Making use of the Young diagram corresponding || yp •:%:,, 3. A A to the representation, we show that the eigenvalues of P , P A and P do not depend on n in SU(n). In Sec. 5, we write the g.e.o.'s in Weyl basis. As is well-known, the Weyl basis makes the study of U(n) easier. The study of our g.e.o.'s is simplified with this basis. The Weyl basis is however less convenient for 14-15 physical problems such as the one suggested by Biedenharn and used in the first three parts of this paper. In particular Biedenharn's basis enables us to render apparent, through the weight operators H , quantities of physical interest, while Weyl's basis does not. Finally, three Appendices deal with problems connected with the main body of the paper, although they are more or less self-contained* Appendix A discusses the algebra whose elements are the structure constants and the coupling coefficients for U(n). Appendix B is devoted with sums of type Last of all, Appendix C gives a general expression for the eigen- 2 values of Gel'fand's invariants For the purpose of unifying the notation, we follow the same definitions and notations as those used in a previous paper , with one exception : summation of the generators X. (or x ) always ir.cludes the number operator H (or h )• As a consequence the coupling coefficient [AB ] is now defined by C [ xA, xB ]+ = [ AB ] xc (I.!) In other words, we extend the metric for SU(n) , to the one of U(n), by letting gAB = &A with gAQ = 6A . 2. Definition and significance of the SU(n) k-particle g.e.o. acting on the k-particle states We shall define such an operator by the following formula : ?k « if £ Wc -EJ x? aw x<*>\ .. X«A) (ni) which differs from that of Biedenharn by the norm and the coefficient [ABC ...E]. The interests of our definition will appear below. InEq.(II.l) a., a. ..., a, stand for the k-particles, whereas x , x , ... x are the generators of the fundamental ABE representation [1,0] of SU(n) and, finally [ABC ... E] is the completely symmetric coefficient in all indices A, B, ..., E obtained from the coefficient [ A B-M] [M ...]...[. .E] . More precisely, [AB] (or gAR) and [ABC], which correspond to k = 2 and k = 3 respectively, are completely symmetric by defini- tion . For k $• 4, the coefficient [ABC.. E] can be defined via the following recurrency formula : It should be emphazised that the summation in Eq. (II. 1) has to be extended over all the values of the indiceB A B. E including the value 0 which corresponds to the unit generator. Let us denote, for the particle a., by i (a.) the m state (1 < m < n) of the fundamental representation of SU(n).. The generator x. 1 (x. = h, or e ) acting on * giveB s : A Ai a' • n The index n is superfluous and we shall bmit it in what follows . 5. Let us now examine the significance of P aj ' a2" " ,ak operating on a tensorial product of such one-particle functions. For k = 2, Eq. (II. 1) gives : and by making use of Eq. (II.3) we get : . <b («,)éil) = (b il) ai id.) as is well-known, i.e., P^l a2 simply exchanges the particles a. and a,. For k = 3, firstly using the definition relation of the coupling coeffi­ cient [AB C] written here in the following form : tX-ï .X^CVBCl^ ' (II.6) and secondly, by taking advantage of the useful relation.: where em. is the nxn matrix consisting of unity in the (m.i) position and zeros elsewhere. We should obtain : P3 ^T«,)^^)^7l,)^x^T«()4>T^^7«3^^f;^^*;J (n.s) As a matter of fact, this operator induces on the three particles all the permutations which do not leave any of them unchanged. To be more precise, those permutations are, in cyclic notation, (123) and (13 2), i.e., form the 3-cycle class of the symmetric group S3. For k = 4, we shall use the following relation definition for the coupling coefficient. (a. 9) and with Eq. (II.7) we thus get : 6. «r.r . -,, (»J ("'1 '">' PJjv*" A1"1» A.*** J.""* J f SrteP C " *B *C D ^tfl,)^ }^^ ^ ~«A* ? (11.10) Here we do not get all the permutations leading none of the particle unchanged, because the coefficient [AB-M] [MCD] is not comple­ tely symmetric in all indices. This point leads us to define our g.e.o. by introducing a coefficient [ABCD] completely symmetric in all indices. Thus, for P,al 2 3 4 obtain : 4 we T 4«( mz **£ rtH. «% l»tt< ,*Hj »Wt rt n 1 w (11.11) Jt+s, ,'* 3 ,'" i «*tt »*"15 j.^* ^ , 0*ï» j_' '( 1 The significance of the P. 2 3 4 operator is now clear. It induces on the 4-particles the six permutations (1234).(1243) , (1 324), (1342), (1423), (1432) which belong to the 4-cycle class of S4- By an inductive process, we might generalize the results obtained for k = 2, 3 and 4. The significance of a k-particle g.e.o. P. * 2'" k for SU(n) (n ^. k) acting on a k-particle state function corresponds to the permutations on the k-objects belonging to the class defined by the cycles of length k. 7. 3. a) Definition of the SU(n) k-particle g.e.o. acting on the A-particle states ( A > k ) We shall define it through : which is a generalization of Eq. (II.1).( One must verify of course ai a a that for the particular case A = k, we have Pk =Pk 2'-' k). By expanding Eq. (III. 1) ,we get : It is clear that the quantity S LtiB — E] X„ X^--- X^ is completely symmetric in indices a , a , .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5.1 Two-Particle Systems
    5.1 Two-Particle Systems We encountered a two-particle system in dealing with the addition of angular momentum. Let's treat such systems in a more formal way. The w.f. for a two-particle system must depend on the spatial coordinates of both particles as @Ψ well as t: Ψ(r1; r2; t), satisfying i~ @t = HΨ, ~2 2 ~2 2 where H = + V (r1; r2; t), −2m1r1 − 2m2r2 and d3r d3r Ψ(r ; r ; t) 2 = 1. 1 2 j 1 2 j R Iff V is independent of time, then we can separate the time and spatial variables, obtaining Ψ(r1; r2; t) = (r1; r2) exp( iEt=~), − where E is the total energy of the system. Let us now make a very fundamental assumption: that each particle occupies a one-particle e.s. [Note that this is often a poor approximation for the true many-body w.f.] The joint e.f. can then be written as the product of two one-particle e.f.'s: (r1; r2) = a(r1) b(r2). Suppose furthermore that the two particles are indistinguishable. Then, the above w.f. is not really adequate since you can't actually tell whether it's particle 1 in state a or particle 2. This indeterminacy is correctly reflected if we replace the above w.f. by (r ; r ) = a(r ) (r ) (r ) a(r ). 1 2 1 b 2 b 1 2 The `plus-or-minus' sign reflects that there are two distinct ways to accomplish this. Thus we are naturally led to consider two kinds of identical particles, which we have come to call `bosons' (+) and `fermions' ( ).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 MANY PARTICLE SYSTEMS
    Chapter 4 MANY PARTICLE SYSTEMS The postulates of quantum mechanics outlined in previous chapters include no restrictions as to the kind of systems to which they are intended to apply. Thus, although we have considered numerous examples drawn from the quantum mechanics of a single particle, the postulates themselves are intended to apply to all quantum systems, including those containing more than one and possibly very many particles. Thus, the only real obstacle to our immediate application of the postulates to a system of many (possibly interacting) particles is that we have till now avoided the question of what the linear vector space, the state vector, and the operators of a many-particle quantum mechanical system look like. The construction of such a space turns out to be fairly straightforward, but it involves the forming a certain kind of methematical product of di¤erent linear vector spaces, referred to as a direct or tensor product. Indeed, the basic principle underlying the construction of the state spaces of many-particle quantum mechanical systems can be succinctly stated as follows: The state vector à of a system of N particles is an element of the direct product space j i S(N) = S(1) S(2) S(N) ­ ­ ¢¢¢­ formed from the N single-particle spaces associated with each particle. To understand this principle we need to explore the structure of such direct prod- uct spaces. This exploration forms the focus of the next section, after which we will return to the subject of many particle quantum mechanical systems. 4.1 The Direct Product of Linear Vector Spaces Let S1 and S2 be two independent quantum mechanical state spaces, of dimension N1 and N2, respectively (either or both of which may be in…nite).
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions and the Casimir Effect in Neutron Stars
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2017 Phase Transitions and the Casimir Effect in Neutron Stars William Patrick Moffitt University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Other Physics Commons Recommended Citation Moffitt, William Patrick, "Phase Transitions and the Casimir Effect in Neutron Stars. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by William Patrick Moffitt entitled "Phaser T ansitions and the Casimir Effect in Neutron Stars." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Physics. Andrew W. Steiner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Marianne Breinig, Steve Johnston Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Phase Transitions and the Casimir Effect in Neutron Stars A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville William Patrick Moffitt December 2017 Abstract What lies at the core of a neutron star is still a highly debated topic, with both the composition and the physical interactions in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking Abelian Chiral Spin Liquid in Mott Phases of Three-Component Fermions on the Triangular Lattice
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 023098 (2020) Time-reversal symmetry breaking Abelian chiral spin liquid in Mott phases of three-component fermions on the triangular lattice C. Boos,1,2 C. J. Ganahl,3 M. Lajkó ,2 P. Nataf ,4 A. M. Läuchli ,3 K. Penc ,5 K. P. Schmidt,1 and F. Mila2 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany 2Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 3Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 4Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Université Grenoble Alpes and CNRS, 25 avenue des Martyrs, 38042 Grenoble, France 5Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, H-1525 Budapest, P.O.B. 49, Hungary (Received 6 December 2019; revised manuscript received 20 March 2020; accepted 20 March 2020; published 29 April 2020) We provide numerical evidence in favor of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and the concomitant appearance of an Abelian chiral spin liquid for three-component fermions on the triangular lattice described by an SU(3) symmetric Hubbard model with hopping amplitude −t (t > 0) and on-site interaction U. This chiral phase is stabilized in the Mott phase with one particle per site in the presence of a uniform π flux per plaquette, and in the Mott phase with two particles per site without any flux. Our approach relies on effective spin models derived in the strong-coupling limit in powers of t/U for general SU(N ) and arbitrary uniform charge flux per plaquette, which are subsequently studied using exact diagonalizations and variational Monte Carlo simulations for N = 3, as well as exact diagonalizations of the SU(3) Hubbard model on small clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Quantum Theory of Spin Waves
    2 Quantum Theory of Spin Waves In Chapter 1, we discussed the angular momenta and magnetic moments of individual atoms and ions. When these atoms or ions are constituents of a solid, it is important to take into consideration the ways in which the angular momenta on different sites interact with one another. For simplicity, we will restrict our attention to the case when the angular momentum on each site is entirely due to spin. The elementary excitations of coupled spin systems in solids are called spin waves. In this chapter, we will introduce the quantum theory of these excita- tions at low temperatures. The two primary interaction mechanisms for spins are magnetic dipole–dipole coupling and a mechanism of quantum mechanical origin referred to as the exchange interaction. The dipolar interactions are of importance when the spin wavelength is very long compared to the spacing between spins, and the exchange interaction dominates when the spacing be- tween spins becomes significant on the scale of a wavelength. In this chapter, we focus on exchange-dominated spin waves, while dipolar spin waves are the primary topic of subsequent chapters. We begin this chapter with a quantum mechanical treatment of a sin- gle electron in a uniform field and follow it with the derivations of Zeeman energy and Larmor precession. We then consider one of the simplest exchange- coupled spin systems, molecular hydrogen. Exchange plays a crucial role in the existence of ordered spin systems. The ground state of H2 is a two-electron exchange-coupled system in an embryonic antiferromagnetic state.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 461 / Quantum Mechanics I
    Physics 461 / Quantum Mechanics I P.E. Parris Department of Physics University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, Missouri 65409 January 10, 2005 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 7 1.1WhatisQuantumMechanics?......................... 7 1.1.1 WhatisMechanics?.......................... 7 1.1.2 PostulatesofClassicalMechanics:.................. 8 1.2TheDevelopmentofWaveMechanics..................... 10 1.3TheWaveMechanicsofSchrödinger..................... 13 1.3.1 Postulates of Wave Mechanics for a Single Spinless Particle . 13 1.3.2 Schrödinger’sMechanicsforConservativeSystems......... 16 1.3.3 The Principle of Superposition and Spectral Decomposition . 17 1.3.4 TheFreeParticle............................ 19 1.3.5 Superpositions of Plane Waves and the Fourier Transform . 23 1.4Appendix:TheDeltaFunction........................ 26 2 The Formalism of Quantum Mechanics 31 2.1 Postulate I: SpecificationoftheDynamicalState.............. 31 2.1.1 PropertiesofLinearVectorSpaces.................. 31 2.1.2 Additional Definitions......................... 33 2.1.3 ContinuousBasesandContinuousSets................ 34 2.1.4 InnerProducts............................. 35 2.1.5 ExpansionofaVectoronanOrthonormalBasis.......... 38 2.1.6 Calculation of Inner Products Using an Orthonormal Basis . 39 2.1.7 ThePositionRepresentation..................... 40 2.1.8 TheWavevectorRepresentation.................... 41 2.2PostulateII:ObservablesofQuantumMechanicalSystems......... 43 2.2.1 OperatorsandTheirProperties.................... 43 2.2.2 MultiplicativeOperators.......................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Arxiv:1405.1548V3 [Quant-Ph] 21 Dec 2015
    The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Gerard 't Hooft Institute for Theoretical Physics Utrecht University Postbox 80.195 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/˜hooft101/ When investigating theories at the tiniest conceivable scales in nature, almost all researchers today revert to the quantum language, accepting the verdict from the Copenhagen doctrine that the only way to describe what is going on will always involve states in Hilbert space, controlled by operator equations. Returning to classical, that is, non quantum mechanical, descriptions will be forever impossible, unless one accepts some extremely contrived theoretical constructions that may or may not reproduce the quantum mechanical phenomena observed in experiments. Dissatisfied, this author investigated how one can look at things differently. This book is an overview of older material, but also contains many new observations and calculations. Quantum mechanics is looked upon as a tool, not as a theory. Examples are displayed of models that are classical in essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and we argue that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analyse a system that could be classical at its core. We explain how such thoughts can conceivably be reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual ob- jections voiced against the notion of `superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle. Our proposal would eradicate the collapse problem and the measurement problem. Even the arXiv:1405.1548v3 [quant-ph] 21 Dec 2015 existence of an \arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant way than usual.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes
    M.Phys Option in Theoretical Physics: C6 John Chalker and Andre Lukas Physics Department, Oxford University 2010-2011 2 Chapter 1 Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 Mathematical Background In this first part of the chapter, we will introduce functionals which are one of the main tools in modern theoretical physics and explain how to differentiate and integrate them. In the second part, these techniques will be applied to re-formulate quantum mechanics in terms of functional integrals (path integrals). 1.1.1 Functionals What is a functional? Let us first consider a real function f :[a,b] R, mapping all elements x [a,b] in the domain [a,b] to real numbers f(x). A functional is similar to a function→ in that it maps all elements∈ in a certain domain to real numbers, however, the nature of its domain is very different. Instead of acting on all points of an interval or some other subset of the real numbers, the domain of functionals consists of (suitably chosen) classes of functions itself. In other words, given some class f of functions, a functional F : f R assigns to each such f a real number F [f]. { } { } → Differentiation and integration are the two main operationson which the calculus of (real or complex) functions is based. We would like to understand how to perform analogous operations on functionals, that is, we would like to make sense of the expressions δF [f] , f F [f] (1.1) δf D Z for functional differentiation and integration. Here, we denote a functional derivative by δ/δf, replacing the ordinary d/dx or ∂/∂x for functions, and the measure of a functional integral by f, replacing dx in the case of integrals over functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Particle States 31.1 Multi-Particle Wave Functions
    Physics 342 Lecture 31 Multi-Particle States Lecture 31 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April 16th, 2010 Just as quantum mechanics in one dimensions is meant to motivate and inform (and, in some specific cases, to model), quantum mechanics applied to a single particle in an external field is a fundamentally incomplete, albeit useful, picture. After all, an electron is not alone in the universe with a Coulomb field. Something is generating the Coulomb field, and we are honor bound to treat the entirety of the system, not just the electron in isolation. Indeed, we can establish the relative correctness of an electron in isolation only by considering its relation to other electrons and particles. This is the task we now undertake: A description of wavefunctions of sys- tems. Particles in isolation is itself a classical concept { fundamentally, quantum particles and more generally, quantum fields are all part of the \master wave-function of the universe". Think of the program of multi- particle classical mechanics: We have a position vector r(t) 2 IR3N for N particles, and the goal is to find the motion of each particle from Newton's second law (or some Euler-Lagrange equivalent). In the quantum mechanical analogue of this problem, the wave function is still the goal, but we don't get a vector 2 IR3N wave function, instead we want a one-dimensional wave function that depends on 3N coordinates (plus time, of course). 31.1 Multi-Particle Wave Functions It is easy to think about what we mean by multiple particles interacting in quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics
    Symmetries in Quantum Mechanics Summer School on Quantum Mechanics (July 29 - August 2, 2019) Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipora, Pulwama, Jammu & Kashmir Govind S. Krishnaswami, Chennai Mathematical Institute www.cmi.ac.in/∼govind/teaching/awantipora-qm-sch19 [email protected], August 11, 2019 Contents 1 References 1 2 Generators of transformations, symmetries and conservation laws 2 2.1 Generators of space translations...................................................2 2.2 Generator of time translation and time evolution operator.....................................2 2.3 Angular momentum as the generator of rotations..........................................3 2.4 Example of rotations generated by orbital and spin angular momentum..............................3 2.5 Symmetries and conservation laws..................................................5 3 Parity: A discrete symmetry 6 4 Symmetry among identical particles: bosons & fermions 7 4.1 Identical and indistinguishable particles...............................................7 4.2 Two spin half electrons in Helium.................................................. 11 4.3 Coulomb and exchange interactions.................................................. 12 4.4 Electronic configuration of light elements and periodic table.................................... 13 5 Time reversal 14 5.1 Time reversal in classical mechanics................................................. 14 5.2 Time reversal in quantum mechanics................................................. 15 1 References 1. E Wichmann, Quantum Physics, Berkeley Physics Course, Vol 4. 2. R P Feynman, R B Leighton and M Sands, Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 3. 3. H S Mani and G K Mehta, Introduction to Modern Physics. 4. B Dutta-Roy, Elements of Quantum Mechanics. 5. J J Sakurai and J J Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Ed. 6. L I Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill (1968). 7. P J E Peebles, Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Univ Press (1992). 8. B H Bransden and C J Joachain, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Ed., Pearson (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Microscopic Theory of Nuclear Fission: a Review
    Reports on Progress in Physics REVIEW Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review To cite this article: N Schunck and L M Robledo 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 116301 Manuscript version: Accepted Manuscript Accepted Manuscript is “the version of the article accepted for publication including all changes made as a result of the peer review process, and which may also include the addition to the article by IOP Publishing of a header, an article ID, a cover sheet and/or an ‘Accepted Manuscript’ watermark, but excluding any other editing, typesetting or other changes made by IOP Publishing and/or its licensors” This Accepted Manuscript is © © 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd. During the embargo period (the 12 month period from the publication of the Version of Record of this article), the Accepted Manuscript is fully protected by copyright and cannot be reused or reposted elsewhere. As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a subscription basis, this Accepted Manuscript is available for reuse under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence after the 12 month embargo period. After the embargo period, everyone is permitted to use copy and redistribute this article for non-commercial purposes only, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence https://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/3.0 Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory and Operator Algebras
    ISSN 0029-3865- meiiiiffiiB BR01G1424 CBPF - CENTRO BRASILE1RO DE PESQUISAS FISICAS Rio de Janeiro Notas de Ffsica CBPF-NF-019/01 April 2001 Lectures on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory and Operator Algebras Bert Schroer MCT - Ministerio da Ciencia © Tecnologia BRASIL Lectures on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory and Operator Algebras BERT SCHROER INSTITUT FUR THEORETISCHE PHYSIK FU-BERLIN, ARNIMALLEE 14, 14195 BERLIN, GERMANY PRESENTLY: CBPF, RUA DR. XAVIER SIGAUD, 22290-180 Rio DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL EMAIL [email protected] based on lectures presented at the 2001 Summer School in Florianopolis and at the IMPA in Rio de Janeiro, April 2001 ABSTRACT. In this series of lectures directed towards a mainly mathematically oriented audience I try to motivate the use of operator algebra methods in quantum field theory. Therefore a title as "why mathematicians are/should be interested in algebraic quantum field theory" would be equally fitting. Besides a presentation of the framework and the main results of local quantum physics these notes may serve as a guide to frontier research problems in mathematical physics with applications in particle and condensed matter physics for whose solution operator algebraic methods seem indispensable. The ultraviolet problems of the standard approach and the recent holographic aspects belong to this kind of problems. CONTENTS 1 Quantum Theoretical and Mathematical Background 1 2 Superselections and Locality in Quantum Physics 21 3 Conformally invariant Local Quantum Physics 45 4 Constructive use of Modular Theory 57 CBPF-NF-019/01 1 1. QUANTUM THEORETICAL AND MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND The fact that quantum field theory came into being almost at the same time as quantum mechanics often lead people to believe that it is "just a relativistic version of quantum mechanics".
    [Show full text]