DOCSLIB.ORG

Binational Fisheries Management Plan for Amistad Reservoir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Binational Fisheries Management Plan for Amistad Reservoir fa:J-1 / D-' / '1 Binational Fisheries Management Plan for Amistad Reservoir United States Agency Contributors: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department National Park Service US Fish & Wildlife Service * Mexico Agency Contributors: Secretarfa de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentacion. Instituto Nacional de Pesca. Comision Nacional del Agua. Secretaria de Turismo SCT Gobierno del Estado de Coahuila * Mexico agencies contributed to the development of the plan, but none have signed the final docume11", .&I:'k:-rr.. ~~I~htt ~)~J~l~ fU~ i~rORMATlth\l ~€NiER SEIiIViGE CENTER P/,RKSERV1CF. -- .. ----------------------------------------------------------------- BINATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Amistad National Recreation Area National Park Service Del Rio, Texas Approved: --=-Q~~~_LJ__ ---.y-----=+~4---4~-=o~G:...-.... Superintendent Date Amistad National Recreation Area Approved: ",,--if/~fi ~--,-,fJ,--"-,iLL",,,----,,---,~ ____ P.-f-1 s=+-/.=.....:::O fa=----_ Di~r, Inland Flshenes ~D~ite Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Approved: ____________________________ (Mexico is not a signatory at this time) Date Binational Fisheries Management Plan Binational Fisheries Management Plan 11 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 Reservoir history and its purposes .................................................................................. 1 Environmental description .............................................................................................. 2 Types of activities that occur on the reservoir ................................................................ 3 Fishing .................................................................................................................................... 3 Other Activities ....................................................................................................................... 3 Commercial fishing ................................................................................................................ 4 Current designations affecting the reservoir ................................................................... 4 us Designations ..................................................................................................................... 4 Mexico Designations .............................................................................................................. 4 US - Mexico Joint Designations/Treaty ................................................................................. 4 Agency management plans that affect reservoir management ....................................... 4 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) ......................................................... 4 National Park Service ............................................................................................................. 5 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (Inland Fisheries) ....................................................... 5 Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentaci6n (SAGARPA) ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Agreements between management agencies and groups ................................................ 5 United States ........................................................................................................................... 5 Mexico .................................................................................................................................... 5 Binational management plan purpose and need .............................................................. 7 Process used to develop cooperative plan ....................................................................... 7 AGENCY MISSION STATEMENTS ............................................................................ 9 United States ................................................................................................................... 9 National Park Service ............................................................................................................. 9 US Fish and Wildlife Service ................................................................................................. 9 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.. .................................................................................. 9 International Boundary & Water Commission ....................................................................... 9 Mexico ............................................................................................................................ 9 SAGARPA .............................................................................................................................. 9 INP ........................................................................................................................................ 10 CONAPESCA ....................................................................................................................... 10 CAN ...................................................................................................................................... 10 State of Coahuila ................................................................................................................... 10 HISTORY OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT ON THE RESERVOIR ...................... 10 State of Texas ................................................................................................................ 10 Species Inanaged ................................................................................................................... 10 Stocking history .................................................................................................................... 11 Harvest regulation history ..................................................................................................... 13 Mexico .......................................................................................................................... 14 Species managed ................................................................................................................... 14 Stocking History ................................................................................................................... 15 Harvest regulation history ..................................................................................................... 15 Cooperative Accords Reached in the Past .................................................................... 16 Binational Fisheries Management Plan 111 CURRENT STATUS AND CONDITION OF THE FISHERY RESOURCES ........ 17 Species composition, abundance and distribution ........................................................ 17 Threatened and endangered species .............................................................................. 18 Invasive species ............................................................................................................ 21 Status of sport fisheries ................................................................................................. 21 Regulations ........................................................................................................................... 22 Prohibitions ........................................................................................................................... 23 Status of commercial fishery ........................................................................................ 23 Mexican fisheries studies .............................................................................................. 25 Habitat limitations ......................................................................................................... 26 MAJOR ISSUES OF CONCERN ................................................................................. 28 Recreational - commercial fisheries conflicts ............................................................... 28 Increasing recreational use and tournaments ................................................................ 28 Fishing access ............................................................................................................... 29 Water quality/quantity/regulation ................................................................................. 30 Conflicting use .............................................................................................................. 30 Education and outreach ................................................................................................. 30 COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ....................................................... 32 Management goals ........................................................................................................ 32 Management protocols .................................................................................................. 36 Regulation changes ............................................................................................................... 36 Implementation of the Binational Management Plan committee .......................................... 36 Management constraints ....................................................................................................... 36 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW .........
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introductions of Threatened and Endangered Fishes (Full Statement)
    AFS Policy Statement #19: Introductions of Threatened and Endangered Fishes (Full Statement) ABSTRACT Introductions of threatened and endangered fishes are often an integral feature in their recovery programs. More than 80% of threatened and endangered fishes have recovery plans that call for introductions to establish a new population or an educational exhibit, supplement an existing population, or begin artificial propagation. Despite a large number of recent and proposed introductions, no systematic procedural policies have been developed to conduct these recovery efforts. Some introductions have been inadequately planned or poorly implemented. As a result, introductions of some rare fishes have been successful, whereas recovery for others has progressed slowly. In at least one instance, the introduced fish eliminated a population of another rare native organism. We present guidelines for introductions of endangered and threatened fishes that are intended to apply when an introduction is proposed to supplement an existing population or establish a new population. However, portions of the guidelines may be helpful in other Situations, such as establishing a hatchery stock. The guidelines are divided into three components: (1) selecting the introduction site, (2) conducting the introduction, and (3) post-introduction monitoring, reporting, and analysis. Implementation should increase success of efforts to recover rare fishes. "On 3 August 1968, we collected 30 or 40 individuals from among the inundated prickly pear and mesquite near the flooded spring, which by that time was covered with about 7 m of clear water." Peden (1973) The above quote described the collection of Amistad gambusia, Gambusia amistadensis, as its habitat was being flooded. Fortunately, most translocations of endangered fishes do not occur under such a feverish pace as did this collection of Amistad gambusia.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11
    Fisheries ISSN: 0363-2415 (Print) 1548-8446 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11 To cite this article: (2015) Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11, Fisheries, 40:11, 525-572, DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2015.1115707 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2015.1115707 Published online: 05 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 147 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ufsh20 Download by: [Department Of Fisheries] Date: 13 March 2016, At: 23:47 FisheriesVol. 40 • No. 11 • November 2015 Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 23:47 13 March 2016 How to Thrive in Grad School Are Hermaphroditic Fish More Vulnerable to Fishing? Introduced Populations Help Preclude ESA Listing “I was amazed at how eective these gloves were and how easy they made handling of large-sized fishes.” – Alan Temple* “We were some of the first people to field-test [the gloves]. We used them last spring in our hatcheries to spawn muskies and walleye, and in the field to implant transmitters in muskies, walleyes and trout for telemetry studies. They worked great. We were really impressed.” – Je Hansbarger** · Portable, waterproof, and lightweight · Measuring and tagging made simple · Chemical free handling · Fish can be lawfully released immediately Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 23:47 13 March 2016 · Rubber gloves Safely immobilize live fish with Smith-Root’s new insulate user FISH HANDLING GLOVE SYSTEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Irrigated Agriculture and the Transfer of Irrigation Use State Bar
    Future of Irrigated Agriculture and the Transfer of Irrigation Use GLENN JARVIS, ESQ. Law Offices of Glenn Jarvis Inter National Bank Bldg. 1801 S. 2nd Street, Ste. 550 McAllen, TX 78503 State Bar of Texas 12th Annual Changing Face of Water Rights Course February 24-25, 2011 San Antonio, Texas Chapter 15 Future of Irrigated Agriculture and the Transfer of Irrigation Use Chapter 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Setting - Where are We? ........................................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 B. REALITIES OF OUR TIME .............................................................................................................. 1 II. What We Are Doing ......................................................................................................................................... 4 A. SURFACE WATER RIGHTS -A Case Study on the Rio Grande - A Large Agricultural Area - Conversion of Irrigation Rights to Municipal and Industrial Rights, Legislation and Marketing ................................................................................ 5 (1) Background ............................................................................................................... 6 (2) Conversion of Irrigation Water Rights to Municipal on Urban Lands ....................... 9 (3) Water Marketing in the Lower and Middle Rio Grande .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Las Moras Seco Creek K Er LAVACA MEDINA US HWY 77 Springs Uvalde LEGEND Medina River
    Cedar Creek Reservoir NAVARRO HENDERSON HILL BOSQUE BROWN ERATH 281 RUNNELS COLEMAN Y ANDERSON S HW COMANCHE U MIDLAND GLASSCOCK STERLING COKE Colorado River 3 7 7 HAMILTON LIMESTONE 2 Y 16 Y W FREESTONE US HW W THE HIDDEN HEART OF TEXAS H H S S U Y 87 U Waco Lake Waco McLENNAN San Angelo San Angelo Lake Concho River MILLS O.H. Ivie Reservoir UPTON Colorado River Horseshoe Park at San Felipe Springs. Popular swimming hole providing relief from hot Texas summers. REAGAN CONCHO U S HW Photo courtesy of Gregg Eckhardt. Y 183 Twin Buttes McCULLOCH CORYELL L IRION Reservoir 190 am US HWY LAMPASAS US HWY 87 pasas R FALLS US HWY 377 Belton U S HW TOM GREEN Lake B Y 67 Brady iver razos R iver LEON Temple ROBERTSON Lampasas Stillhouse BELL SAN SABA Hollow Lake Salado MILAM MADISON San Saba River Nava BURNET US HWY 183 US HWY 190 Salado sota River Lake TX HWY 71 TX HWY 29 MASON Buchanan N. San G Springs abriel Couple enjoying the historic mill at Barton Springs in 1902. R Mason Burnet iver Photo courtesy of Center for American History, University of Texas. SCHLEICHER MENARD Y 29 TX HW WILLIAMSON BRAZOS US HWY 83 377 Llano S. S an PECOS Gabriel R US HWY iver Georgetown US HWY 163 Llano River Longhorn Cavern Y 79 Sonora LLANO Inner Space Caverns US HW Eckert James River Bat Cave US HWY 95 Lake Lyndon Lake Caverns B. Johnson Junction Travis CROCKETT of Sonora BURLESON 281 GILLESPIE BLANCO Y KIMBLE W TRAVIS SUTTON H GRIMES TERRELL S U US HWY 290 US HWY 16 US HWY P Austin edernales R Fredericksburg Barton Springs 21 LEE Somerville Lake AUSTIN Pecos
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(S): Noel M
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Source: BioScience, 62(9):798-808. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • American Fisheries Society Guidelines for Introductions of Threatened and Endangered Fishes Jack E. Williams, Donald W. Sada, Cy
    American Fisheries Society Guidelines for Introductions of Threatened and Endangered Fishes Jack E. Williams, Donald W. Sada, Cynthia Deacon Williams and Other Members of the Western Division Endangered Species Committee1 ABSTRACT Introductions of threatened and endangered fishes are often an integral feature in their recovery programs. More than 80% of threatened and endangered fishes have recovery plans that call for introductions to establish a new population or an educational exhibit, supplement an existing population, or begin artificial propagation. Despite a large number of recent and proposed introductions, no systematic procedural policies have been developed to conduct these recovery efforts. Some introductions have been inadequately planned or poorly implemented. As a result, introductions of same rare fishes have been successful, whereas recovery for others has progressed slowly. In at least one instance, the introduced fish eliminated a population of another rare native organism. We present guidelines for introductions of endangered and threatened fishes that are intended to apply when an introduction is proposed to supplement an existing population or establish a new population. However, portions of the guidelines may be helpful in other situations, such as establishing a hatchery stock. The guidelines are divided into three component: (1) selecting the introduction site, (2) conducting the introduction, and (3) post- introduction monitoring, reporting, and analysis, Implementation should increase success of efforts to recover rare fishes. Introduction "On 3 August 1968, we collected 30 or 40 individuals from among the inundated prickly pear and mesquite near the flooded spring, which by that time was covered with about 7 m of clear water."- Peden (1973) The above quote described the collection of Amistad gambusia, Gambusia amistadensis, as its habitat was being flooded.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Sources, Loading and Salinity of the Pecos River
    INFLUENCE OF TRIBUTARIES ON SALINITY OF AMISTAD INTERNATIONAL RESERVOIR S. Miyamoto, Fasong Yuan and Shilpa Anand Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Center at El Paso Texas Agricultural Experiment Station An Investigatory Report Submitted to Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency In a partial fulfillment of A contract TSSWCB, No. 04-11 and US EPA, No. 4280001 Technical Report TR – 292 April 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The study reported here was performed under a contract with the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (TSSWCB Project No. 04-11) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Project No. 4280001). The overall project is entitled “Basin-wide Management Plan for the Pecos River in Texas”. The materials presented here apply to Subtask 1.6; “River Salinity Modeling”. The cost of exploratory soil sample analyses was defrayed in part by the funds from the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture under Agreement No. 2005-34461-15661. The main data set used for this study came from an open file available from the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (US- IBWC), and some from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). Administrative support to this project was provided by the Texas Water Resource Institute (TWRI). Logistic support to this project was provided by Jessica N. White and Olivia Navarrete, Student Assistants. This document was reviewed by Nancy Hanks of the Texas Clean Rivers Program (TCRP), Gilbert Anaya of the US-IBWC, and Kevin Wagner of the Texas Water Resource Institute (TWRI).
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Supply Limitations on Irrigation from the Rio Grande in Starr, Hidalgo, Cameron, and Willaey Counties, Texas, on the Basis of the Twe Methods
    ,. TEXAS WATER CQM}ITSSION Joe D. Carter, Chairman William E. Berger, Commissioner O. F. Dent, Commissioner BULLETIN 6413 A AP PEN 0 ICE S T 0 B U L LET IN 6 4 1 3 WATER-SUPPLY LIMITATIONS ON IRRIGATION FROM THE RIO GRAf'..'DE IN STARR, HIDALGO J CMtERON, AND WILLACY COUNTIES 1 TEXAS By John T. Carr, Jr., t. C. Janca, Robert L. Warzecha, Ralph B. Hendricks, Allen E. Richardson, Henry H. Porterfield, Jr., and PauL T. Gillett August 1965 ( Published and distributed by the ( Texas Water Commission Post Office Box 12311 Austin, Texas 78711 ( Authorization for use or reproduction of any original oaterial contained in this publication, i. e., not obtained from other sources) is freely granted without the necessity of securing permission therefor. The Commission would ap­ ( preciate acknowledgement of the source of original material so utilized. ( ( FOREWORD These appendices are the reports on the separate investigations and studies undertaken to obtain pertinent data and to develop bases for the selection of criteria for use in the comprehensive study summarized in the Texas Water Com­ mission Bulletin 6413, '~ater-Supply Limitations on Irrigation From the Rio Grande in Starr, Hidalgo, Cameroo, and IHllacy Counties, Texas," November 1964, and are supplementary thereto. The criteria and assumptions used in the various phases of the computations made in this comprehensive study were selected and determined by John J. Vandertulip, Chief Engineer; Louis L. McDaniels, Research Program Coordinator; and C. Olen Rucker, Hydrology Program Coordinator in collaboration ~"'ith the personnel engaged in this study. The appendices were prepared in final form by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pterygoplichthys Pardalis
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Pterygoplichthys pardalis Pterygoplichthys pardalis System: Freshwater Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Actinopterygii Siluriformes Loricariidae Common name Amazon sailfin catfish (English, United States), carachama (Spanish, Ecuador, Peru), cascudo (Spanish, Peru), peru- riesenschilderwels (German, Germany), acari (Portuguese, Brazil), ajas (Spanish, Peru), pantterileväpleko (Finnish, Finland), cachpas (Spanish, Peru), cachga (Spanish, Peru), vieja (Spanish, Peru), acari bodó bodó (Portuguese, Brazil) Synonym Hypostomus pardalis , (Castelnau, 1855) Liposarcus jeanesianus , (Cope, 1874) Liposarcus pardalis , (Castelnau, 1855) Liposarcus varius , (Cope, 1872) Similar species Summary view this species on IUCN Red List Lifecycle Stages Growth of Pterygoplichthys is rapid during the first two years of life, with total lengths of many sailfin catfishes exceeding 300 mm by age 2. Specimens in aquaria may live more than 10 years. The size range for most of the adult species in the Loricariid family is 30–50 cm, but individuals have been observed to reach 70 cm. Pterygoplicthys spp. start reproducing at approximately 25 cm (Mendoza et al, 2009). Habitat Description Pterygoplichthys spp. can be found in a wide variety of habitats, ranging from relatively cool, fast- flowing and oxygen-rich highland streams to slow-flowing, warm lowland rivers and stagnant pools poor in oxygen. They are tropical fish and populations are typically limited only by their lower lethal temperature which has been found to be about 8.8-11°C in some species (Gestring, 2006). They can thrive in a range of acidic to alkaline waters in a range of about (pH 5.5.0 to 8.0) (Mendoza et al., 2009). They are often found in soft waters, but can adapt very quickly to hard waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Quantitative Assessment to Assist in Identification Of
    RAPID QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFICATION OF IMPERILED FISHES by Nicky M. Hahn, B.S. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a Major in Aquatic Resources August 2017 Committee Members: Timothy H. Bonner, Chair M. Clay Green Mar Huertas COPYRIGHT By Nicky M. Hahn 2017 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As copyright holder of this work I, Nicky M. Hahn, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank Dr. Timothy Bonner for his incredible fish knowledge, vast understanding of geologic history, and most especially his patience in handling all my questions about both. I can’t count the times a conversation tangent in the truck has helped me understand the fish world from a new angle. I thank Dr. Mar Huertas for pushing me to understand fish on an even deeper level, for serving on my committee, and for giving me an example of a woman succeeding in science. I thank Dr. Clay Green, both for serving on my committee and for shaping my view of conservation.
    [Show full text]