DOCSLIB.ORG

Vmes Has Been Identified Extending Around the Edge of the Flemish Cap

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vmes Has Been Identified Extending Around the Edge of the Flemish Cap Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Database Northwest Flemish Cap 10 Geographical reference Northwest Atlantic Management Body/Authority Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Area Type Area of higher sponge and coral concentration (NAFO) Closed since 2010-01-01 until 2020-12-31 Habitat and Biology General Biology Sea pens are key structural components of soft-bottom vulnerable marine ecosystems in the NRA. Aggregations of sea pens, known as “fields”, provide important structure in low-relief sand and mud habitats where there is little physical habitat complexity. These fields provide refuge for small planktonic and benthic invertebrates which in turn may be preyed upon by fish. A system of seapen VMEs has been identified extending around the edge of the Flemish Cap. Crinoids and cerianthids, and black corals have been found associated with this seapen VME system. Sponge and seapen VME, cerianthids, and crinoids are also found outside the closure. This closure was established to protect high concentration locations within one of the units of this seapen VME system. Physical description of the environment Flemish Cap is a plateau of approximately 200 km radius at the 500 m isobaths, with depths of less than 150 m at its center and separated from Grand Bank by the approximately 1200 m deep Flemish Pass. The Flemish Cap has a patch of sand in its centre, in the shallower area, but most of the Cap is covered with muddy sand and sandy mud. Map FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. Management Measures specific to this area Area closed to bottom fishing until 31 Dec 2014 (Art 16.3-4) Period in force: 2011-01-01 to 2014-12-31 Source of information NAFO Conservation and Enforcement Measures 2011 (NAFO FC Doc. 11/1 Serial No. N5867) http://archive.nafo.int/open/fc/2011/fcdoc11-01.pdf 2011 NAFO. 2011. Scientific Council Meeting, 19-23 Sep 2011. Scientific Council Meeting Report 2011, p. 235- 262. http://archive.nafo.int/open/rb/2011/SCRep-11-C.pdf Scientific Council 2011 19 Sep 2011 - 23 Sep 2011 A representative from SC attended the OSPAR/NEAFC/CBD Workshop on Identification of Environmental, Biological Significant Areas (EBSAs), Port-Cros, France, 8-9 September 2011. A report of the meeting is included. [VI.5.e. EBSA Workshop]. A member of the NAFO Secretariat will attend the FAO VME Database meeting [IX.5. FAO VME Database Meeting] NAFO. 2011. Meeting Proceedings of the General Council and Fisheries Commission for 2011/2012. Section III. Report of the Fisheries Commission, Sep 2011. p. 2--216. http://archive.nafo.int/open/fc/2011/fcdoc11- 38.pdf Fisheries Commission 2011 19 Sep 2011 - 23 Sep 2011 FC received the report of the WGFMS VME. [12. Report and Recommendations of WGFMS VME]. Based on their recommendations, FC adopted (a) the extension of the existing coral and sponge closures until December 31, 2014 to synchronize with the seamount closure, and (b) the proposed update of Chapter Ibis of the NCEM. Further, various amendments were made to the NAFO CEM including the extension of the boundary for “Area 5 - Northeast Flemish Cap” down to the 2 500 meter contour, and reducing the live sponge threshold to 400 kg and 600 kg in new and existing fishing areas, respectively [Annex 17. Update of Chapter Ibis – Bottom Fisheries in the NAFO Regulatory Area]. Norway presented an information paper FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department explaining their own new policies for protecting VMEs that includes all waters below 1000 m depth being considered VMEs. [15. Other Matters pertaining to Ecosystem Considerations]. The ToRs for WGFMS VME were updated [Annex 16. ToRs WGFMS VME] and the previously identified VME was asked to be re- evaluated according to modern criteria [Annex 18]. NAFO. 2011. Scientific Council Meeting, 3-16 Jun 2011. Scientific Council Meeting Report 2011, p. 1-214. http://archive.nafo.int/open/rb/2011/SCRep-11-A.pdf Scientific Council 2011 03 Jun 2011 - 16 Jun 2011 SC received a full report from WGEAFM outlining their current strategic work on VMEs, the GIS framework for estimating threshold levels, and the Swept Area Seabed Impact model (SASI) model. [X.1. WGEAFM]. NAFO. 2010. Scientific Council Meeting, 20-24 Sep 2010. Scientific Council Meeting Report 2010, p. 231- 259. http://archive.nafo.int/open/rb/2010/SCRep-10-C.pdf Scientific Council 2010 20 Sep 2010 - 24 Sep 2010 SC responded to 6 questions from FC during the current meeting that generally related to the advice. [V.3.a. Seamounts]. SC noted that the information contained within the report of WGEAFM was presented to Scientific Council at their June 2010 meeting The information contained within the report of WGEAFM was presented to Scientific Council at their June 2010 meeting. [VI.1. WGEAFM]. New information was submitted by Russia on the Corner Seamounts and this will be discussed at the December 2010 WGEAFM meeting. [X.2. VMEs on the Corner Seamounts] NAFO. 2010. Meeting Proceedings of the General Council and Fisheries Commission for 2010/2011. Section III. Report of the Fisheries Commission, Sep 2010. p. 117-215. http://archive.nafo.int/open/mp/2010-11/fc- sep10.pdf Fisheries Commission 2010 20 Sep 2010 - 24 Sep 2010 FC introduced the NEREIDA project side-event. The NEREIDA conducts multidisciplinary research surveys on vulnerable ecosystems and the effects of fishing activities. The survey is funded by EU-Spain, Canada, EU- United Kingdom and the Russian Federation. Specific objectives include identifying organisms that constitute Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs), describing ecology of deep-sea habitats studying distinct features in the area and developing a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database. Deep-sea Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) took video footage of both pristine coral areas and areas where corals had been impacted by bottom contact gears. [IV. Ecosystem Considerations]. The six seamount closures were rolled over for four years until 31 December 2014. [IV.11. Review of seamounts closure]. WGFMS VME presented (a) revised Exploratory Fishery Data Collection Form, (b) revised Article 5bis of the NCEM on Interim Encounter Provision, (c) map of existing fishing areas in the NAFO Regulatory area, and (d) updated Chapter Ibis of the NCEM, which were adopted by FC. The (e) revised Article 4bis on Assessment of Bottom Fishing was considered by FC who adopted an alternative proposal [Annex 12. Amendment of Article 4bis of Chapter Ibis – Assessment of Bottom Fishing]. FC requested advice from SC on (13) the new information arising from the NEREIDA project, (14) on impacts and the use of GIS and SASI models, and (15) fishery impact assessments [Annex 5. Fisheries Commission’s Request for Scientific Advice Nos 13, 14, 15] NAFO. 2010. Scientific Council Meeting, 3-16 Jun 2010. Scientific Council Meeting Report 2010, p. 7-230. http://archive.nafo.int/open/rb/2010/SCRep-10-B.pdf Scientific Council 2010 03 Jun 2010 - 16 Jun 2010 SC provided FC with advice on (a) fishing plans/initial assessments for evaluating SAI on VMEs and on viable risk evaluation methodologies for the standardized assessment of fishery impacts, and (b) assess new and developing methodologies on thresholds levels, ii. new commercial bycatch information, and iii. review current encounter threshold values of 60 kg live coral and 800 kg sponge. [VII.1.d.iv. VME Fishery Impact Assessments]. SC also reviewed the current 6 seamount closures Fogo Seamounts 1, Fogo Seamounts 2, Orphan Knoll, Corner Seamounts, Newfoundland Seamounts, and New England Seamounts, and associated protocols for vessels. SC noted that all currently available information supports the closure of these seamounts. SC also noted that there is a clear potential for fishing gears other than bottom trawling to produce significant adverse impacts on VME communities, and that depletion overfishing on localized fish populations is a concern in seamount fisheries. [VII.1.d.v Seamount closures] Management Body/Authority Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization's (NAFO) overall objective is to contribute through consultation and cooperation to the optimum utilization, rational management and conservation of the fishery resources of its area of competence, and to FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department ensure the long term conservation and sustainable use of the fishery resources and, in so doing, to safeguard the marine ecosystems in which these resources are found. Web site http://www.nafo.int/ Regional Fishery Body fact sheet http://www.fao.org/fishery/rfb/NAFO/en © FAO, 2015 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vmes on the Corner Seamounts] NAFO
    Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Database Newfoundland Seamounts Geographical reference Northwest Atlantic Management Body/Authority Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Area Type Seamount closure (NAFO) Closed since 2007-01-01 until 2021-12-31 Habitat and Biology General Biology Seamounts are uniquely complex habitats that rise into bathyal and epi-pelagic depths. In general seamounts, owing to their isolation tend to support endemic populations and unique faunal assemblages. Physical description of the environment: Seamounts Newfoundland Seamounts consist of 6 peaks with summits all deeper than 2400 m, with most of the area being deeper than 3500m. The Newfoundland seamounts were volcanically active in the late Cretaceous period. Named seamounts include Shredder and Scruntion. Map FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. Management Measures specific to this area Area closed to bottom fishing from 1 Jan 2007 to 31 Dec 2010. Provisions for exploratory fishery, encounters and temporary closures. (Art 15.5-10) Period in force: 2007-01-01 to 2010-12-31 Source of information NAFO Conservation and Enforcement Measures 2010 (NAFO FC Doc. 10/1 Serial No. N5740) http://archive.nafo.int/open/fc/2010/fcdoc10-01.pdf 2010 NAFO. 2010. Scientific Council Meeting, 20-24 Sep 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems – Processes and Practices in the High Seas Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Processes and Practices in the High Seas
    ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 595 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 595 Vulnerable marine ecosystems – Processes and practices in the high seas Vulnerable marine ecosystems Processes and practices in the high seas This publication, Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems: processes and practices in the high seas, provides regional fisheries management bodies, States, and other interested parties with a summary of existing regional measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts caused by deep-sea fisheries using bottom contact gears in the high seas. This publication compiles and summarizes information on the processes and practices of the regional fishery management bodies, with mandates to manage deep-sea fisheries in the high seas, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. ISBN 978-92-5-109340-5 ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 9 789251 093405 I5952E/2/03.17 Cover photo credits: Photo descriptions clockwise from top-left: Acanthagorgia spp., Paragorgia arborea, Vase sponges (images courtesy of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada); and Callogorgia spp. (image courtesy of Kirsty Kemp, the Zoological Society of London). FAO FISHERIES AND Vulnerable marine ecosystems AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL Processes and practices in the high seas PAPER 595 Edited by Anthony Thompson FAO Consultant Rome, Italy Jessica Sanders Fisheries Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Merete Tandstad Fisheries Resources Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Fabio Carocci Fishery Information Assistant FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy and Jessica Fuller FAO Consultant Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Universities Geological Conference 2000
    Atlantic Geology 179 Atlantic Universities Geological Conference 2000 October 12-14,2000 ABSTRACTS Conference hosted by: G.M. Dawson Geology Club Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Again this year, abstracts from the annual Atlantic Universities Geological Conference (AUGC) are published in Atlantic Geology. This provides a permanent record o f the abstracts, and also focuses attention on the excellent quality o f these presentations and the interesting and varied geoscience that they cover. The Editors Abstracts published with financial assistance from the Earth Science Committee of APICS Atlantic Geology 36, 179-183 (2000) 0843-5561 /00/020179-5$ 1.75/0 180 AUGC-A bstracts The geology of the Fogo seamounts Ashely de Jonge Department of Geology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3 The Fogo seamounts are located approximately 500 km volcanism is seen across the transform margin. Flat tops of offshore Newfoundland and southwest of the Grand Banks. seamounts indicate marine erosion once volcanic activity They are early Cretaceous basalts partially buried under slope stopped, followed by subsidence as the oceanic lithosphere deposits that mantle a transform fault zone. It is believed that cooled. The flat tops show a complex pattern but are generally the seamounts formed one of two ways. They may have deeper to the NW, suggesting greater time for subsidence in formed either from the relative movement of the lithosphere that direction. This is supported by biostratigraphic and over a mantle hot spot or by magma rising along a linear fault radiometric data from wells and a dredge sample taken from zone. The distribution and age of the Fogo seamounts was the area as the seamounts appear to go decrease in age from studied to decide which of these processes was likely NW to SE.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Rise Hot Spot System' Implicationsfor African and South American Plate Motions Over Plumes
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 95, NO. BI1, PAGES 17,475-17,502,OCTOBER 10, 1990 Evolution of the Walvis Ridge-Rio Grande Rise Hot Spot System' Implicationsfor African and South American Plate Motions Over Plumes JOHN M. O'CONNOR AND ROBERT A. DUNCAN College of Oceanography,Oregon State University,Corvallis Crystallizationages of volcanicrocks, dredged or drilled from the Walvis Ridge (ten sites)and the Rio GrandeRise (one site), have been determined by the 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating technique. The fundamentallyage-progressive distribution of thesebasement ages suggests a commonhot spot sourcefor volcanismon the island of Tristan da Cunha, along the Walvis Ridge and Rio Grande Rise, and for the formation of the continental flood basalts located in Namibia (Africa) and Brazil (South America). The WalvisRidge-Rio Grande Rise volcanic system evolved along a sectionof the SouthAtlantic spreading-axis, as the African and South American plates migratedapart, astride,or in closeproximity to, an upwelling plume. Reconstructionsof the spatialrelationship between the spreading-axis,the Tristan hot spot, and the evolvingWalvis Ridge-Rio Grande Rise volcanic feature show that, at about70 Ma, thespreading-axis began to migratewestward, away from the hot spot. The resultingtransition to intraplatehot spotvolcanism along the Walvis Ridge (and associatedtermination of Rio GrandeRise formation)also involveda northward migrationof previouslyformed African seafloor over the hot spot. Rotationparameters for Africanmotion overfixed hot spots(i.e., absolutemotion) have been recalculated such that the predictedtrail of the Tristan hotspot agrees with the distribution of radiometricand fossil basement ages along the Walvis Ridge. African absolutemotion has been extended to the Southand North American plates, by the additionof relativemotion reconstructionpoles.
    [Show full text]
  • Comdoc17-16 Revisionneseamountsclosure
    Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N6741 NAFO/COM Doc. 17-16 [Adopted] 39th ANNUAL MEETING OF NAFO - SEPTEMBER 2017 Revision of New England Seamounts Closure Explanatory memorandum Under the revised NAFO convention, NAFO members have recommitted themselves to applying an ecosystem approach to fisheries management, including conserving the marine biodiversity within NAFO waters. This responsibility to ensure sustainable fisheries and safeguarding the marine environment has been reflected in NAFO’s efforts to protect vulnerable marine ecosystem elements, such as seamounts and their associated fisheries. In 2014, the Scientific Council recommended expansion of the seamount protection zones surrounding the New England and Corner Rise Seamount chains located within the NAFO Regulatory Area (SCS 14/17 REV). With regards to the New England and Corner Rise seamount chains, the SC recommended that the polygons be expanded to include all relevant seamounts. Subsequently, and as directed by the Commission at its 2016 annual meeting, the Joint Commission-Scientific Council Working Group on Ecosystem Approach Framework to Fisheries Management (WG-EAFFM) gave consideration to the boundary of the New England Seamounts at its July 2017 meeting. While no proposal for amendment of the current polygon was developed, there was a general agreement that the peaks shallower than 2000m must be protected. The WG also recognized that the current seamount closures included very large areas that do not contain seamounts. Therefore, and on this basis, the United States and Canada propose refining the boundary of the New England Seamounts closure reducing the overall footprint to 178 535 km2, compared to the original closure area of 275 225 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd in Marine Sciences
    Title/Name of the area: Madeira – Tore Presented by Maria Ana Dionísio (PhD in marine sciences), with a grant funded by Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas and ISPA - Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Sociais e da Vida, [email protected] Pedro Ivo Arriegas, Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, [email protected] Abstract (in less than 150 words) Madeira-Tore EBSA includes a total of 17 seamounts. Seamounts are hotspots of marine life and in general they represent areas of an enhanced productivity, especially when compared with nearby abyssal areas. This EBSA has a total area of 197431 km2 with depths ranging from 25m (top of Gettysburg seamount) to 4930m (bottom of Tore seamount). The area includes a proposed Site of Community Importance - Gorringe Bank and an OSPAR High Seas Marine Protected Area – Josephine seamount. All structures included in the Madeira-Tore EBSA fulfill four or more out of the seven EBSA scientific criteria. A total of 965 species are present in this EBSA of which 7% are protected under international or regional law. Introduction (To include: feature type(s) presented, geographic description, depth range, oceanography, general information data reported, availability of models) The Madeira-Tore EBSA includes a total of 17 seamounts (Ampere, Ashton, Coral Patch (northern part of), Dragon, Erik, Gago Coutinho, Godzilla, Gorringe Bank (Ormond and Gettysburg seamounts), Hirondelle II, Josephine, Lion, Pico Pia, Tore, Seine, Sponge Bob, and Unicorn). These seamounts present particular features which make this area eligible as an EBSA when assessed against the EBSA scientific criteria. Benthic biological communities on seamounts are highly vulnerable to human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • VME Database Meeting [IX.5
    Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Database Newfoundland Seamounts Geographical reference Northwest Atlantic Management Body/Authority Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Area Type Seamount closure (NAFO) Closed since 2007-01-01 until 2020-12-31 Habitat and Biology General Biology Seamounts are uniquely complex habitats that rise into bathyal and epi-pelagic depths. In general seamounts, owing to their isolation tend to support endemic populations and unique faunal assemblages. Physical description of the environment: Seamounts Newfoundland Seamounts consist of 6 peaks with summits all deeper than 2400 m, with most of the area being deeper than 3500m. The Newfoundland seamounts were volcanically active in the late Cretaceous period. Named seamounts include Shredder and Scruntion. Map FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. Management Measures specific to this area Area closed to bottom fishing from 1 Jan 2007 to 31 Dec 2010. Closure rolled over until 31 Dec 2014. Provisions for exploratory fishery, encounters and temporary closures. (Art 15.5-10) Period in force: 2007-01-01 to 2014-12-31 Source of information NAFO Conservation and Enforcement Measures 2011 (NAFO FC Doc. 11/1 Serial No. N5867) http://archive.nafo.int/open/fc/2011/fcdoc11-01.pdf 2011 NAFO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Fogo Seamounts
    180 AUGC-ABSTRACTS The geology of the Fogo seamounts Ashely de Jonge Department ofGeology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS BJH 3C3 The Fogo seamounts are located approximately 500 km volcanism is seen across the transfonn margin. Flat tops of offshore Newfoundland and southwest of the Grand Banks. seamounts indicate marine erosion once volcanic activity They are early Cretaceous basalts partially buried under slope stopped, followed by subsidence as the oceanic lithosphere deposits that mantle a transform fault zone. It is believed that cooled. The flat tops show a complex pattern but are generally the seamounts formed one of two ways. They may have deeper to the NW, suggesting greater time for subsidence in formed either from the relative movement of the lithosphere that direction. This is supported by biostratigraphic and over a mantle hot spot or by magma rising along a linear fault radiometric data from wells and a dredge sample taken from zone. The distribution and age of the Fogo seamounts was the area as the seamounts appear to go decrease in age from studied to decide which of these processes was likely NW to SE. responsible for their origin. These data support the idea that the seamounts originated The distribution, size, and geometry of the seamounts was from magma that was caused by a plume that moved relative detennined using bathymetry, magnetics, and seismic to the lithosphere. Reactivated faults then channelled this reflection profiles. The distribution of the seamounts shows magma upward, making the Fogo seamounts different from that there is no clear linear trend; instead a broad zone of typical seamount chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantleplumes Template.Indd
    www.MantlePlumes.org Igneous Features and Geodynamic Models of Rifting and Magmatism Around the Central Atlantic Ocean J. Gregory McHone Stones2Gems, 9 Dexters Lane, Grand Manan, NB E5G 3A6 Canada [email protected] Introduction The early history of the central Atlantic Ocean basin is receiving new interest from studies of a vast tholeiitic fl ood basalt province that was active over 10 million km2 of central Pangaea, starting about at 201 Ma during continental rifting, and before the initiation of new ocean crust (Hames et al., 2002). This newly-recognized LIP is known as the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, or CAMP (Marzoli et al., 1999), and it apparently evolved into the mid-ocean rift production of Atlantic Ocean crust, starting in the Early Jurassic and continuing into the present. After the initial split of Pangaea, little igneous activity occurred within the central Atlantic Ocean during the next 70 Ma, outside of ocean ridge volcanism. In the Early Cretaceous, numerous alkaline igneous plutonic/volcanic complexes developed in widely separated continental margin regions of eastern North America, Iberia, and western Africa. Subsequently throughout the Cretaceous and Cenozoic Periods, similar alkaline igneous events have marked many regions of the Atlantic seafl oor with more than a hundred seamounts and volcanic islands. In contrast to the brief but enormous pulse of Early Jurassic CAMP magmatism, the Cretaceous and younger continent margin/ocean basin volcanoes were mainly local and independent events, with individual histories of activity. Despite the time gap of 70 Ma and the compositional gulf between quartz tholeiites and alkali olivine basalts, some geologists have attempted to connect and explain these different igneous features through a model of a deep mantle plume.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceans Act Marine Protected Areas
    Status Report on Coral and Sponge Conservation in Canada 2009 Photo Credit: Fisheries and Oceans Canada (L-R) Mycale spp., Paragorgia arborea, Primnoa resedaeformis ii 2009 STATUS REPORT ON CORAL AND SPONGE CONSERVATION IN CANADA by J.S. Campbell1 and J.M. Simms2 112 Tamarack Street, St. John’s NL, A1A 4S5 2 National Centre of Expertise Cold-Water Corals and Sponge Reefs Fisheries and Oceans Canada P.O. Box 5667 St. John's, NL A1C 5X1 iii © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2009. Correct citation for this publication: Campbell, J.S. and Simms, J.M. 2009. Status Report on Coral and Sponge Conservation in Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada: vii + 87 p. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................vii Résumé.........................................................................................................................viii 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Overview of Corals and Sponges in Canada............................................................. 2 2.1 Biology.................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Distribution............................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Ecosystem function..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the ICES\NAFO Joint Working Group on Deep-Water Ecology (WGDEC)
    ICES WGDEC REPORT 2013 ICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ICES CM 2013/ACOM:28 Report of the ICES\NAFO Joint Working Group on Deep-water Ecology (WGDEC) 11–15 March 2013 Floedevigen, Norway International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2013. Report of the ICES\NAFO Joint Working Group on Deep-water Ecology (WGDEC), 11–15 March 2013, Floedevigen, Norway. ICES CM 2013/ACOM:28. 95 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2013 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGDEC REPORT 2013 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 4 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 5 3 Provide all available new information on distribution of VMEs in the North Atlantic and update maps with a view to advising on any boundary modifications of existing closures
    [Show full text]
  • CBD/EBSA/WS/2019/1/4 8 November 2019
    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/EBSA/WS/2019/1/4 8 November 2019 ENGLISH ONLY REPORT OF THE REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS IN THE NORTH- EAST ATLANTIC OCEAN1 Stockholm, 22-27 September 2019 INTRODUCTION 1. At its tenth meeting, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity requested the Executive Secretary to work with Parties and other Governments as well as competent organizations and regional initiatives, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), regional seas conventions and action plans, and, where appropriate, regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) to organize, including the setting of terms of reference, a series of regional workshops, with a primary objective to facilitate the description of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs) through the application of the scientific criteria given in decision IX/20, annex I, as well as other relevant compatible and complementary nationally and intergovernmentally agreed scientific criteria, as well as the scientific guidance on the identification of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, which meet the scientific criteria in annex I to decision IX/20 (see decision X/29, para. 36). 2. Subsequently, at its eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth meetings, the Conference of the Parties reviewed the outcomes of the regional workshops conducted and requested the Executive Secretary to include the summary reports prepared by the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, as contained in the annexes to decisions XI/17, XII/22, XIII/12 and 14/9, in the repository of ecologically or biologically significant marine areas, and to transmit the summary reports to the United Nations General Assembly and its relevant processes, as well as to Parties, other Governments and relevant international organizations, in line with the purpose and procedures set out in decisions X/29, XI/17 and XII/22.
    [Show full text]