DOCSLIB.ORG

Aligned Core Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aligned Core Strategies Ref: BROXTOWE BOROUGH, GEDLING BOROUGH and NOTTINGHAM CITY ALIGNED CORE STRATEGIES WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING OF THE GEDLING BOROUGH COUNCIL CONSERVATIVE GROUP MATTER 2 1 MATTER2: THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND HOUSING POLICY The Future of Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City in the Context of Greater Nottingham Population Trends 1. Whilst the figures within the document (Section 2.2.9) indicate a population growth across Greater Nottingham of 8.9% in the years 2001 – 2010, recently published figures from the 2011 census clearly indicate that population growth is by no means consistent across the area of the plan. 2. Nottingham City has experienced population growth of some 13.7% whilst Gedling Borough has only experienced growth of 1.6% with the population of the Borough rising from 111,800 to 113,600. 3. Net Migration within the Greater Nottingham area including Gedling Borough is generally negative with the only increase being within the 16 -24 year old age group. This in-migration is clearly linked to the success and popularity of the University of Nottingham and Nottingham Trent University. (Section 2.2.10) 4. It is a matter of fact that the bulk of the student population reside within the City of Nottingham and the areas to the South and West of the City. There is no evidence of any demand for additional student accommodation within Gedling Borough, nor, owing to the constraints of transport and distance, is there ever likely to be. 5. Ravenshead and Newstead are, as outlined within Section 2.2.10, primarily within the Mansfield Travel-to-Work Area (TTWA) and not the Nottingham TTWA. (Section 2.2.10) Connections 6. Much of the proposed new residential development within Gedling Borough is to be situated within the Parished Areas to the North and East of the Borough, rather than adjacent to the PUA’s of Arnold or Carlton. These are areas which in many cases have insufficient public transport links to the City of Nottingham and where the road infrastructure is woefully inadequate in terms of being able to accommodate the level of additional traffic that is likely to be generated by the size and scale of the proposed developments. 2 7. As identified in Section 2.2.16 there is already significant traffic congestion during peak hours on main radial and orbital routes across the area. Green Infrastructure, Open Space and Landscape 8. As identified in Section 2.2.22 ‘the area’s countryside and open spaces are an important part of its local distinctiveness’ and the size and scale of the proposed developments within the Parished areas will seriously erode the green corridors which ensure the distinct individual identities of the rural villages. 9. The proposals for the development within the Parish of Linby would, if approved, lead to the creation of a new ‘town’ within the Parish of 1,000 plus new residential homes, plus additional commercial and industrial sites. This would make the existing historical conservation village of some 86 properties no more than an adjunct to the new development. 10. Similarly the build of 600 new properties on land north of Papplewick Lane, on land within Gedling Borough but adjacent to the PUA of Hucknall, would virtually link the conservation village of Papplewick to the Sub-Regional Centre of Hucknall by eradicating much of the Open Space between the two settlements. Spatial Vision 11. This element of the consultation document which is intended to reflect back from a future 2028 to the present time refers to the completion of ‘30,550 new homes developed since 2011’ (Section 2.3.3) and I quote ‘sustainably accommodated within the existing built up area of Nottingham which has assisted in reducing the need to travel, made the most of existing infrastructure and has driven the regeneration of parts of the urban area. The built up area of Nottingham has been expanded and new development is creating successful communities, well integrated into the urban area, and with excellent connectivity to the wider city, especially the City Centre and other job opportunities.’ 12. It is difficult to reconcile this statement with the intention to construct huge residential developments within the rural Parish areas, remote from the City of Nottingham, with insufficient road infrastructure and little public transport, in villages in which there is a total reliance on the private motor car as a means of transport and in which there are little or no commercial or industrial job opportunities. Spatial Objectives 13. Section 2.4.1 makes the first of many references to the Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm site in Gedling Borough, but whilst this substantial brown-field site is referred to throughout the document as a site of possible future development, 3 there is no strategy evidenced for making this site accessible and deliverable, nor is there any element of housing provision allocated to it. This despite the fact that the majority of the funding for the Gedling Access Road (GAR) has now been secured, which will allow this site to take its proper place in the available site hierarchy, thus reducing the element of Greenfield sites required to accommodate the headline requirement figure of 7,250 new residential properties. 14. The plan within Section 2.4.1(ii) instead refers to the SUE’s at Top Wighay Farm and North of Papplewick Lane to the north east of Hucknall as supporting the regeneration of Hucknall as a Sub-Regional Centre, notwithstanding that the relevant Local Authority, Ashfield District Council, are openly hostile to these developments. 15. Additionally the Key Settlements of Bestwood Village, Calverton and Ravenshead are to be developed ‘to make the best of their accessibility to services and infrastructure capacity’. 16. Bestwood Village has one corner shop, no public house or Doctor’s surgery and a Primary School that is over-subscribed. It operates an hourly bus service on week- days only and has one significant road, Moor Road, into and out of the village. 17. Calverton, it is accepted, is better placed in terms of a village centre, Doctors Surgery, schools and public transport but has already suffered heavily in recent years in terms of substantial infill and new development. 18. Ravenshead, as already identified is primarily within the Mansfield TTW area, has an over-subscribed Doctors Surgery, Primary Schools both to capacity, and a small privately owned shopping complex and is already the area of highest in-fill development (garden-grabbing) within Gedling Borough. 19. Ravenshead has traditionally had defensible boundaries of Main Road to the North, Chapel Lane to the East, Nottingham Road (A60) to the West and Kighill Lane to the South. Those boundaries have become blurred in recent years with some development on Green-field sites to the east of Chapel Lane and proposals within the plan would erode the boundary to the north, by potentially allocating development between Main Road and Ricketts Lane, thus narrowing the green corridor between the village of Ravenshead and the Harlow Wood development in Ashfield. 20. Quite where the referred to ‘services and infrastructure capacity’ is to be found is somewhat of a mystery to the respective Parish Councils and their communities. 21. Section 2.4.1x refers to the aspiration of Excellent transport systems and reducing the need to travel: to ensure access to jobs…..reducing the need to travel especially by private car… 4 22. As already outlined these identified ‘Key Settlements’ have little or no employment opportunities, are isolated in rural areas and would require a great deal of ‘need to travel’ to offer any form of employment to their enhanced and enlarged communities. Gedling Spatial Portrait/Local Distinctiveness 23. As identified in Section 2.8.1 Gedling Borough is a mix of urban and rural with around 80% of its residents living in the Greater Nottingham suburbs of Arnold and Carlton. The reason for this is quite simply that the bulk of residents, who do not actually serve the commercial or service industry requirements of the immediate area itself, are employed within the Greater Nottingham area. (Section 2.8.6) 24. Transport links between the different settlements within the rural parts of the Borough are poor with some of the rural settlements being relatively isolated. (Section 2.8.1.) The Delivery Strategy Policy2: The Spatial Strategy 25. We have already referred to the anomaly of Bestwood Village, Calverton and Ravenshead being identified as Key Settlements for growth. (Section 2.c.) ii.) 26. Within the overarching figure of 7,250 new homes identified for Gedling Borough and despite all the references to the need to site new developments adjacent to and supportive of Greater Nottingham itself, for all the reasons already identified above, only 2,840 of the new Gedling homes are to be sited in or adjoining the existing built up area of Nottingham. (Section 3a.) 27. This leaves some 60% of the proposed new development therefore to be built on green-field sites in the rural Parished areas of the Borough, which appears contrary to all the rhetoric contained within the strategy document as to the need to align with and support Greater Nottingham itself. 28. Again the brown-field site of Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm is referred to in passing as an area of future housing development only (Section 3a) i.) 29. Section 4 g) and (5 with reference to retail development) for the first time makes reference to the Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm site with the addendum if development commences in the plan period and Section 6 b) i) Highways Improvements identifies the site as a scheme with no committed funding, but which remains important to the delivery of the Core Strategy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 71 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin.QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholjn. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr F B Young, CBE. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED EI£CTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FUR THE BOROUGH OF GEDLING IN THE COUNT*/ OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the borough of Gedling in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of and Schedule 9 to the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60 (l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 18 January 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Gedling Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to the Nottinghamshire County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties* Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the Local Government press and to the local radio broadcasting station* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • (I) Whether the Duty to Co-Operate Has Been Met, and (Ii) Whether the Legal Requirements Have Been Complied With
    Matter 1: The Duty to Co-operate and other Legal Requirements The main issues are (i) whether the duty to co-operate has been met, and (ii) whether the legal requirements have been complied with. Questions: Duty to Co-operate Section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended by s110 of the Localism Act 2011, imposes the duty to co-operate in relation to the planning of sustainable development. Neighbouring local planning authorities, County Councils and bodies prescribed in the Town and Country Planning Regulations 2012, must engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis in the preparation of development plan documents. Section s20(7B) of the 2004 Act establishes that the duty to co-operate is incapable of modification at examination. Where the duty to co-operate has not been complied with, the Inspector has no choice but to recommend non adoption of a local plan. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) describes what is expected for plan-making in paragraphs 178-181. 1. Have the Councils met the duty to co-operate in the preparation of the Aligned Core Strategies plan (ACS), having regard for the Statement of Compliance, CD/REG/04? In particular, has constructive, active and ongoing engagement taken place with Ashfield and Newark and Sherwood District Councils? Ashfield District Council response: 1.1 In addition to the three aligned Core Strategy authorities it is generally recognised that Boroughs of Rushcliffe and Erewash and the four wards of Hucknall in the District of Ashfield set within an area recognised as the Greater Nottingham area.
    [Show full text]
  • Gedling Borough Council Papplewick Neighbourhood Plan
    Gedling Borough Council Papplewick Neighbourhood Plan - Decision Statement 6th June 2018 Following an independent examination of the Papplewick Neighbourhood Plan and the receipt of the Examiner’s Report, Gedling Borough Council has decided that subject to the Examiner’s recommended modifications, the Papplewick Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum for the following reasons:- The Neighbourhood Plan:- the Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions; the Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared and submitted for examination by a Qualifying Body, Papplewick Parish Council; the Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared for an area properly designated, the Parish of Papplewick as shown on page 20 of the Plan; the Neighbourhood Plan specifies the period to which it is to take effect, 2017 – 2028; and the policies relate to the development and use of land for a designated neighbourhood area. Gedling Borough Council also agreed with the Examiner’s recommendation that the referendum of the Neighbourhood Plan should be based on the designated Neighbourhood Area approved by Gedling Borough Council on 11th August 2016. This Decision Statement and the Examiner’s Report (including the recommended modifications to the Papplewick Neighbourhood Plan) can be viewed on Gedling Borough Council’s website (www.gedling.gov.uk/papplewickplan/) and Papplewick Parish Council’s website. The documents are also available for inspection at the following locations:- Gedling Borough Council, Civic Centre, Arnot Hill Park, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 6LU Papplewick & Linby Village Hall, Linby Lane, Papplewick, NG15 8FB Background 1. On 11th August 2016, Gedling Borough Council formally designated the Papplewick Neighbourhood Area (as shown on page 20 of Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Papplewick Conservation Area Character Appraisal & Management Plan
    PAPPLEWICK CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PLAN July 2018 Papplewick Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan (July 2018) CONTENTS: PART 1 CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Introduction 4 3. Location and General Plan Form 7 4. Landscape Setting 13 5. Historic Development of the Area 15 6. Archaeology 19 Character and Relationship of Spaces Within the 7. 20 Conservation Area 8. Contribution Made By Green Spaces and Trees 23 9. Key Views and Vistas 24 10. Prevailing Activity and Uses 26 11. Architectural and Historic Qualities of the Buildings 29 12. Issues, Pressures, Threats and Opportunities 32 13. Review of the Conservation Area Boundary 37 Appendices 1. Designated Heritage Assets within the Conservation Area 44 2. Key Unlisted Buildings within the Conservation Area 46 List of Maps Map 1: Original Papplewick Conservation Area Boundary and 6 Important Historic Buildings Map 2: Papplewick Conservation Area Principal Character Areas 21 Map 3: Papplewick Conservation Area Key Views and Vistas 25 Map 4: Papplewick Conservation Area Revisions to the 42 Conservation Area Boundary Map 5 Papplewick Conservation Area Boundary (as amended in 43 2018) Papplewick Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan (July 2018) PART 2 MANAGEMENT PLAN 48 1. Introduction 49 2. Planning Policy Context 49 3. Guide for Planning Applications for New Development 52 4. Householder Extensions 54 5. Solar Panels, Satellite Dishes and Alarm Boxes 55 6. Preservation of Buildings in the Conservation Area 55 7. Demolition of Buildings within the Conservation Area 55 8. Historically Significant Boundary Walls 56 9. Protection of Important Views 57 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum to the Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham
    Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Sustainability Appraisal Report of the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version Addendum May 2013 This page is intentionally blank Sustainability Appraisal Report on Publication Version Document (June 2012) Addendum February 2013 Introduction 1. This report is an addendum to the Greater Nottingham (Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City) Sustainability Appraisal Publication Version June 2012 of the Aligned Core Strategies (ACS). 2. The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004) requires Local Planning Authorities to carry out a Sustainability Appraisal of the proposals in development plan documents and to prepare a report of the findings of that appraisal. Through the SA process, the local planning authority must assess the social, economic and environmental impacts arising from the proposals within the development plan document. The Core Strategies are development plan documents and therefore have been subject to SA at each of the key stages in their preparation. 3. The Councils published a SA Report alongside the Core Strategies in June 2012. 4. The aim of this stage of the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process is to determine whether there are likely to be any significant sustainability effects arising from the proposed amendments to the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version June 2012 (hereafter referred to as the Core Strategies). 5. This report therefore presents the results of the appraisal of the proposed changes to the Core Strategies, including the full appraisal of a new policy (Policy A: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development). The report also provides a summary of comments received at the publication stage of the ACS to the SA and officer responses to those comments, plus commentary on updates to baseline data and characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Brackens Court a Convenient Location Within Easy Reach of Nottingham City
    Brackens Court A convenient location within easy reach of Nottingham city centre, the region’s main commuter routes, and the beautiful Nottinghamshire countryside – Brackens Court has it all. The Heather 3 Bedroom home Plots: 4, 6 – 8, 21 – 24, 33 – 36, 117 & 118 The Scarlet 3 Bedroom home Brackens Court Plots: 1 – 3, 9 – 20, 46, 47, 61, 62, 82, 85, 147 – 151 & 159 – Sales Electricity Sub Complex 161 station The Claret 4 Bedroom home Plots: 83, 84, 141 – 146 & 162 – 167 Brackens Court is just over The Citrine four miles from Nottingham 4 Bedroom home Plot: 59 – 61, 94, 99, 102, 104, city centre, home to a vast 113, 115, 119, 140, 168, 173 & Retained access to commercial site array of shopping and 174 The Sapphire leisure opportunities. 4 Bedroom home Plots: 5, 37, 38, 44, 51 – 53, 55 117 117 Within easy walking distance of Brackens Court – 58, 70, 71, 74, 95 – 98, 101, 113 there are numerous leisure and shopping facilities 103, 114, 155 – 157, 169 & 172 including a public house, a Post Office and General Store combined, a Social Club and a Childs The Magenta Public Footpath Link Playground and recreation area. Also within the 4 Bedroom home area of Bestwood Village there is a Primary School, Plots: 40 – 43, 66 – 68, 72, 75, Community Centre and Village Hall. 79, 100, 138 & 153 The entrance to Bestwood Country Park can also be The Java found on the outskirts of Bestwood Village. The 650 3 Bedroom home acre Nottinghamshire Park is home to a varied range Plots: 54, 80, 81, 116, 137, 152, of wildlife and their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL Election of County Councillors
    NOTICE OF POLL Gedling Borough Council Election of County Councillors for Arnold North Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of County Councillors for Arnold North will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of County Councillors to be elected is two. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors ALLAN 9 Church Street, Labour Party Henry T Wheeler (+) Wendy A Payne (++) Pauline Annette Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 8FD BESTWICK (Address in Gedling Conservative Party Geoffrey A Walker (+) Toni P Le Gallez (++) Stuart James Borough) Candidate DOYLE 2 Grove Close, Conservative Party Geoffrey A Walker (+) Nicholas W Crosby Kevin Backhouse Burton Joyce, Candidate (++) Nottingham, NG14 5FE JONES 24 Monsell Drive, Liberal Democrat Blerina Kellezi (+) Kevin G Parr (++) Tadeusz Redhill, Nottingham, NG5 8LY KEY 22 Castleton Avenue, Independent Phillip Key (+) Terry Key (++) Paul Richard Arnold, Nottinghamshire, NG5 6NJ NORRIS 19 Meeks Road, Green Party John J Stuart (+) Margret S Vince (++) Jim Arnold, NG5 8AQ PAYNE 2B The Mount, Labour Party Henry T Wheeler (+) Wendy A Payne (++) Michael Richard Redhill, Nottingham, NG5 8LU STANSFIELD 48A Arnot Hill Road, Liberal Democrat Tadeusz E Z Jones (+) Blerina Kellezi (++) Jason Martin Arnold, Nottinghamshire, NG5 6LL STICKLAND (Address in Gedling Independent Adrian P Woods (+) Verdi I Stickland (++) Don Borough) Dated Tuesday 27 April 2021 Mike Hill Deputy Returning Officer Printed and published by the Deputy Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Arnot Hill Park, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 6LU 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Broxtowe Borough Gedling Borough Nottingham City Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan
    Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough Gedling Borough Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan Adopted September 2014 Contact Details: Broxtowe Borough Council Foster Avenue Beeston Nottingham NG9 1AB Tel: 0115 9177777 [email protected] www.broxtowe.gov.uk/corestrategy Gedling Borough Council Civic Centre Arnot Hill Park Arnold Nottingham NG5 6LU Tel: 0115 901 3757 [email protected] www.gedling.gov.uk/gedlingcorestrategy Nottingham City Council LHBOX52 Planning Policy Team Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tel: 0115 876 3973 [email protected] www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/corestrategy General queries about the process can also be made to: Greater Nottingham Growth Point Team Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tel 0115 876 2561 [email protected] www.gngrowthpoint.com Alternative Formats All documentation can be made available in alternative formats or languages on request. Contents Working in Partnership to Plan for Greater Nottingham 1 1.1 Working in Partnership to Plan for Greater Nottingham 1 1.2 Why the Councils are Working Together 6 1.3 The Local Plan (formerly Local Development Framework) 6 1.4 Sustainability Appraisal 9 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment 10 1.6 Equality Impact Assessment 11 The Future of Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City in the Context of Greater Nottingham 13 2.1 Key Influences on the Future of the Plan Area 13 2.2 The Character of the Plan Area 13 2.3 Spatial Vision 18 2.4 Spatial Objectives 20 2.5 Links to Sustainable Community
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Nottinghamshire Green Estate Development Strategy
    Appendix 1 Green Estate Sites (04/2014) Site Name Score Asset Area Public District Location Options (Hectares) Access KEY SITES Cotgrave Country Park 37 R 162.1 Part Rushcliffe Hollygate Lane, Cotgrave Daneshill Lakes 36 R 67.2 Yes Bassetlaw Daneshill Road, between Torworth & Lound Teversal & Silverhill Trails (8km w. Brierley Forest link) 33 R 11.4 Yes Ashfield Trail between county boundaries Pleasley and Woodend Moor Pond Wood 32 R 9.2 Yes Gedling Linby Ln, Papplewick (B6011) Southwell Trail (11.5 km incl Bilsthorpe arm) 31 R 27.6 Yes N&S Trail between Southwell & A614 & Bilsthorpe Cockglode and Rotary Woods LNR 29 R 14.9 Yes N&S Between Ollerton & Thoresby Colliery, Sherwood Heath Tippings Wood 29 R 51.2 Part N&S Warsop Lane, Blidworth/Rainworth (B6020) Great Northern Railway Path (1.7 km) 28 R 7.0 Yes Broxtowe Awsworth, Kimberley Ollerton Colliery (East) 28 R 58.2 Yes N&S Newark Rd, Ollerton Shirebrook Colliery North 28 R 79.1 Yes Mansfield Longster Lane, Sookholme (B6407) Shirebrook Colliery South 28 R 56.0 Yes Mansfield Wood Lane (off Bath Lane) Sookholme Rufford No. 1 (Rainworth Water) 26 R 60.5 No N&S Rufford Colliery Access Road, off Rainworth Bypass (A617) Dob Park 25 R 20.4 Yes Ashfield Washdyke Lane (west of Hucknall Bypass, A611) Harby-High Marnham SUSTRANS route (10km) 25 R 5.0 Yes N&S/Bassetlaw nr High Marnham power station to Lincs border Linby Trail (2km) 25 R 4.6 Yes Gedling Trail between Wighay Road, Linby to Newstead Shireoaks & Coachgap Green 25 R 29.6 Yes Bassetlaw Shireoaks Rd, Shireoaks Kimberley Green 24 R 7.2
    [Show full text]
  • Area 7 Local Bus Travel Guide for Hucknall, Sutton, Kirkby And
    Area 7 local bus travel guide for Hucknall, Sutton, Kirkby and Annesley areas August 2014 This leaflet provides a travel map and destination and frequency guide for all local bus services in the Hucknall, Sutton, Kirkby and Annesley area. Full timetables for these services can be obtained from the relevant operators, contact details are shown below. Service Route Days of Early morning Daytime Evening Sundays operation Every Every Every Every 1 (Mansfield Miller) Alfreton (hourly) - Huthwaite - Sutton - Mansfield - Mansfield Woodhouse Daily 10-20 mins 10 mins 30-60 mins 30 mins 3A (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Newstead - Annesley Woodhouse - Kirkby - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60mins 3B (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Annesley - Kirkby - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins 3C (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall - Annesley - Kirkby - Coxmoor Estate - Sutton - Mansfield Daily 30 mins 30 mins 60 mins 60 mins N3 (The threes) Nottingham - Hucknall (0030 - 0230) - Kirkby (0300 & 0330) Fri, Sat night bus 30 mins ---- ---- ---- 8AOT Nottingham - City Hospital - Hucknall Mon - Sat 3 journeys 60 mins ---- ---- 9.1 (The Nines) Mansfield - Sutton - Alfreton - Ripley - Derby Mon - Sat 2 journeys 60 mins 1 journey ---- 9.2 (The Nines) Derby - Ripley - Alfreton - Sutton - Mansfield Mon - Sat 2 journeys 60 mins 60 mins ---- 9.3 (The Nines) Ripley - Alfreton - Sutton - Mansfield Mon - Sat 30 mins 30 mins 30 mins ---- 9.3 Sutton - Alfreton Sun & Bank Hols ---- ---- ---- 60 mins 90 (The Ninety) Mansfield
    [Show full text]
  • Roadworks Bulletin – Gedling Area Temporary Road Closures – Calverton, Carlton, Papplewick & Mapperley
    In partnership with Roadworks Bulletin – Gedling Area Temporary Road Closures – Calverton, Carlton, Papplewick & Mapperley Road No. & TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURES & TEMPORARY NO WAITING Location (a) B683 BLIDWORTH WAYE, PAPPLEWICK (From its junction with A60 Mansfield Road, Ravenshead to its junction with B683 Main Street, Papplewick) (b) B683 MAIN STREET, PAPPLEWICK (From its junction with B683 Blidworth Waye, Papplewick to its junction with B6011 Linby Lane, Papplewick) (c) STANDHILL ROAD, CARLTON (4 PARTS) (From its junction with B686 Carlton Hill, Carlton to its junction with Hillview Road, Carlton) (d) ADDISON ROAD, CARLTON (From its junction with Standhill Road to its junction with Standhill Avenue) (e) HIGHFIELD DRIVE, CARLTON (From its junction with Standhill Road, Carlton to its junction with Greenfield Grove, Carlton) (f) FOXHILL ROAD CENTRAL, CARLTON (From its junction with Second Avenue to its junction with Standhill Road) (g) FORESTER ROAD, CARLTON (From its junction with Porchester Road, Carlton to its junction with Standhill Road, Carlton) (h) HICKLING ROAD, MAPPERLEY (From its junction with Porchester Road, Mapperley to its junction with Robinson Road, Mapperley) (i) ROBINSON ROAD, MAPPERLEY (From its junction with Hickling Road, Mapperley to its junction with Moore Road, Mapperley) (j) MAYS AVENUE, CARLTON (From its junction with Greenwood Road, Bakersfield to its junction with Langdale Road, Nottingham) All side roads to be temporary closed as and when required Anticipated • Friday 7th August Friday 21st August (Hickling
    [Show full text]