Craig Leek SSSI RESEARCH REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Craig Leek SSSI RESEARCH REPORT Research Report No. 916 Third cycle Site Condition Monitoring report for bryological interest – Craig Leek SSSI RESEARCH REPORT Research Report No. 916 Third cycle Site Condition Monitoring report for bryological interest – Craig Leek SSSI For further information on this report please contact: Bob Bryson NatureScot Silvan House 231 Corstorphine Road EDINBURGH EH12 7AT Telephone: 0131 3162677 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Callaghan, D.A. 2020. Third cycle Site Condition Monitoring report for bryological interest – Craig Leek SSSI. NatureScot Research Report No. 916. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of NatureScot. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of NatureScot. © NatureScot 2020. SCM Reports This report was commissioned by NatureScot as part of the Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) programme to assess the condition of special features (habitats, species populations or earth science interests) on protected areas in Scotland (Sites of Special Scientific Interest, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas and Ramsar). SCM is our rolling programme to monitor the condition of special features on protected areas, their management and wider environmental factors which contribute to their condition. The views expressed in the report are those of the contractor concerned and have been used by NatureScot staff to inform the condition assessment for the individual special features. Where the report recommends a particular condition for an individual feature, this is taken into account in the assessment process, but may not be the final condition assessment of the feature. Wider factors, which would not necessarily be known to the contractor at the time of the monitoring, are taken into consideration by our staff in making final condition assessments. RESEARCH REPORT Summary Third cycle Site Condition Monitoring report for bryological interest – Craig Leek SSSI Research Report No. 916 Project No: 113952 Contractor: Des Callaghan Year of publication: 2020 Keywords Craig Leek, bryophytes, monitoring, Tortula leucostoma, Athalamia hyaline Background This report provides a third assessment of the condition of the bryophyte interest of Craig Leek SSSI. A thorough introduction to the bryophyte interest of the site is provided by the previous two assessments (Rothero 1999, 2009), plus an additional survey (Rothero, 2006). Main findings Craig Leek continues to be a very rich site for bryophytes, with 166 species found during the present survey. Additions to the site list include eight Nationally Scarce (Amphidium lapponicum, Bryum elegans, Encalypta ciliata, Jungermannia borealis, Racomitrium canescens, Schistidium robustum, Schistidium trichodon and Tortella bambergeri) and three Nationally Rare (Dicranella grevilleana, Eurhynchiastrum pulchellum and Schistidium papillosum). Other notable species no doubt await discovery. The two most important species at Craig Leek are Tortula leucostoma and Athalamia hyalina. The former was again not found and the population of the latter has undergone a significant decline in the monitoring plots. Open soil, especially thin soil over limestone exposures, is a key niche for many of the species of conservation importance, including Tortula leucostoma and Athalamia hyalina. Photographs of monitoring plots clearly indicate that this habitat continues to decline across the site as a result of vegetation succession. Available evidence strongly suggests that the cause is under grazing. The site condition is again judged to be ‘Unfavourable – Declining’. For further information on this project contact: Bob Bryson, NatureScot, Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh, EH12 7AT. Tel: 0131 3162677 or [email protected] For further information on our research programme contact: Research Coordinator, NatureScot, Great Glen House, Leachkin Road, Inverness, IV3 8NW. Tel: 01463 725000 or [email protected] i Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODS 1 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 3.1 Species inventory 3 3.2 Monitoring plots 6 3.3 Additional photographic locations 33 3.4 Site attributes and targets 35 3.5 Pressures 39 3.6 Condition assessment 40 3.7 Management notes 40 3.8 Site check recommendations 40 4. REFERENCES 41 ANNEX 1: SPECIES INVENTORY 42 ANNEX 2: GPS LOCATIONS OF NOTABLE SPECIES 45 ii Acknowledgements Many thanks to the landowners for allowing access and to SNH staff for help and support. iii 1. INTRODUCTION This report provides a third assessment of the condition of the bryophyte interest of Craig Leek SSSI. A thorough introduction to the bryophyte interest of the site is provided by the previous two assessments (Rothero 1999, 2009), plus an additional survey (Rothero, 2006). Taxonomy follows Hill et al. (2008) and the inclusion of species within the following lists and categories is noted as appropriate: (i) Annex II of the Habitats Directive; (ii) priority species under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006; (iii) Schedule 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended); (iv) UK Red List (Hodgetts, 2011); (v) Nationally Rare (Preston, 2010); (vi) Nationally Scarce (Preston, 2006); (vii) Atlantic, Sub- Atlantic and Western British (Ratcliffe, 1968); and (viii) Hyper-oceanic and Oceanic (Hill and Preston, 1998). 2. METHODS Field surveying was undertaken over three days (20-22 May 2015), following the routes shown in Figure 2.1. All monitoring plots established by Rothero (2006) were revisited and their current condition was assessed, including the collection of photographs. A list of the species seen within the site was also compiled. Weather conditions were good throughout. 1 Figure 2.1. Location of monitoring plots and survey route. Based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Controller of HMSO © Crown copyright (2016) Licence no. 100017908. 2 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Species inventory A total of 166 species were found (Annex 1), of which 22 were either Nationally Rare or Nationally Scarce (Table 1). GPS locations collected for some of the more notable species are provided in Annex 2. All species records will be submitted to the national recording database of the British Bryological Society (BBS), managed by BRC Wallingford, and will be subsequently uploaded to the NBN Gateway. Table 1. Nationally rare and scarce bryophytes recorded during the present fieldwork. Species UK UK National Craig Leek status hectads1 Red status List Amphidium lapponicum 46 Nationally Noted at one location scarce Anomobryum 56 Nationally Frequent on thin soil over limestone concinnatum scarce Bryum elegans 28 Nationally Frequent on thin soil over limestone scarce Clevea hyalina 2 VU Nationally rare See main text Dicranella grevilleana 8 VU Nationally rare Noted at one location, beside calcareous flush Ditrichum flexicaule 66 Nationally Frequent on thin soil over limestone scarce Encalypta ciliata 50 Nationally Noted at one location, on thin soil over scarce limestone Eurhynchiastrum 5 EN Nationally rare Noted at one location, on thin soil over pulchellum limestone Grimmia montana 20 Nationally Occasional on insolated, acidic rocks scarce Jungermannia borealis 23 Nationally Noted at two locations, on thin soil over scarce limestone Lophozia longidens 57 Nationally Seemingly frequent on the bases of birch scarce trees in the western side of the site Pseudoleskeella 22 Nationally Rare on limestone catenulata scarce Pterigynandrum 79 Nationally Scarce on limestone and trees filiforme scarce Pterygoneurum ovatum 25 Nationally Noted at one location, on thin soil over scarce limestone Racomitrium 43 Nationally Scarce on limestone outcrops canescens scarce Scapania 12 NT Nationally rare Noted at two locations, on thin soil over gymnostomophila limestone Schistidium papillosum 21 NT Nationally rare Occasional on limestone Schistidium robustum 44 Nationally Frequent on limestone scarce 3 Schistidium trichodon 22 Nationally Noted at one location scarce Seligeria pusilla 69 Nationally Noted at three locations on shaded scarce limestone Stegonia latifolia 9 NT Nationally rare Occasional on thin soil over limestone Tortella bambergeri 72 Nationally Frequent on tops of limestone boulders scarce 1Number of UK hectads with records during 1990-2014. A number of new species were added to the site list, including eight Nationally Scarce (Amphidium lapponicum, Bryum elegans, Encalypta ciliata, Jungermannia borealis, Racomitrium canescens, Schistidium robustum, Schistidium trichodon and Tortella bambergeri) and three Nationally Rare (Dicranella grevilleana, Eurhynchiastrum pulchellum and Schistidium papillosum). The most notable addition is Eurhynchiastrum pulchellum, a very rare plant in Britain recorded in only five hectads during 1990-2014, all in Scotland and with a concentration on Skye (Blockeel et al., 2014). The distribution of OS 10 m grid cells found to be occupied by Athalamia hyalina (n=16) is shown in the following figure. 4 Figure 3.1. Distribution of OS 10 m grid cells occupied by Athalamia hyalina in 2015. 5 3.2 Monitoring plots 3.2.1 Plot T1 Grid reference: NO18867.92849 Species: Tortula leucostoma 2005: Two areas with scattered stems (seven stems and nine stems). 2009: Not refound. 2015: Figure 3.2. Not refound. Vegetation structure significantly different to October 2005, with grassier field layer and greater birch scrub. Rock falls have also altered the
Recommended publications
  • Spore Dispersal Vectors
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Adaptive Strategies: Spore Dispersal Vectors. Chapt. 4-9. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 4-9-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 3 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4-9 ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES: SPORE DISPERSAL VECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS Dispersal Types ............................................................................................................................................ 4-9-2 Wind Dispersal ............................................................................................................................................. 4-9-2 Splachnaceae ......................................................................................................................................... 4-9-4 Liverworts ............................................................................................................................................. 4-9-5 Invasive Species .................................................................................................................................... 4-9-5 Decay Dispersal............................................................................................................................................ 4-9-6 Animal Dispersal .......................................................................................................................................... 4-9-9 Earthworms ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Egyptian Mosses Wagieh El-Saadawi1, Hanaa M
    1 Taeckholmia 35: 1-23 (2015) An annotated checklist of Egyptian mosses Wagieh El-Saadawi1, Hanaa M. Shabbara2, Manal Ibrahim Khalil3 and Mai Ahmed Taha4* 1-4Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], 3manalibrahim2000@ yahoo.com, [email protected] *Corresponding author. Wagieh El-Saadawi, Hanaa M. Shabbara, Manal Ibrahim Khalil and Mai Ahmed Taha, 2015. An annotated checklist of Egyptian mosses. Taeckholmia 35: 1-23. The presented list of Egyptian mosses includes 181 taxa in 56 genera, 17 families and 10 orders. Synonyms reported only from Egypt are given in a separate list. The distribution of the 181 mosses in the 11, hitherto, surveyed phytogeographic territories of Egypt shows that S, Mm, Cai and Di are the richest territories regarding the number of recorded taxa. Pottiaceae, Bryaceae and Funariaceae dominate the flora. Pohlia lescuriana (Sull.) Ochi is a new record to Egypt. Other relevant annotations are also given. Key words: Checklist, Egypt, Mosses, Pohlia lescuriana. Introduction The increasing interest in the taxonomy of the bryophytes, especially aimed at biodiversity conservation has stimulated the elaboration of updated and corrected checklists (Cortini 2001). During the last five decades six checklists of Egyptian mosses had been published by: Imam & Ghabbour (1972); EL-Saadawi and Abou EL-Kheir (1973); El-Saadawi & Badawi (1977); El-Saadawi et al. (1999); El-Saadawi et al. (2003) and Ros et al. (2013). Naturally the number of recorded mosses increased with time and the last list included 166 taxa. ______________________ Received 25 July, Accepted 31 August 2015 2 Wagieh El-Saadawi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Estonian Bryophytes
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 52: 109–127 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2015.52.14 Annotated checklist of Estonian bryophytes Kai Vellak1,2, Nele Ingerpuu2, Mare Leis3 & Loore Ehrlich4 1Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, Tartu 51014. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, Tartu 51005. E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 5 Fr. R. Kreutzwald Street, 51014 Tartu. E-mail: [email protected] 4Estonian Museum of Natural History, 26 Toompuiestee Street, 10148 Tallinn. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The updated list of Estonian bryophytes includes 594 species from all three phyla. Only one species is reported for Estonia according to the literature data, all others have voucher speciemens in herbaria, two of them outside of Estonia. Altogether 242 species are frequent in Estonia, 173 species are rare, and 161 are sporadically distributed. We do not have any recent data for 20 species, and their presence in Estonia is doubtful. In 2008 a new Estonian Red list was compiled and 369 bryophyte species were evaluated against IUCN criteria. Approximately one fifth of the Estonian bryoflora (129 species) is designated to the three threat categories. Keywords: Bryoflora, frequencies of species, protected species, red list INTRODUCTION The diversity of taxa at the global or local scale taxa according to recently accepted synonyms, depends greatly on the taxonomical research. supply every taxa with a voucher specimen, The species number of bryophytes in the world estimate the present frequency in Estonia and varies between 15 000 and 20 000 (Shaw et al., give proper names in Estonian for new taxa or 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Tassel Moss,Crossidium Seriatum
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Tassel Crossidium seriatum in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2014 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Tassel Crossidium seriatum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 33 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Lyn Baldwin and W. Marc Jones for writing the status report on the Tiny Tassel, Crossidium seriatum, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by René Belland, co-chair of the COSEWIC Mosses and Lichens Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Petit pompon (Crossidium seriatum) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Tassel — Photo credit: Lyn Baldwin. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Catalogue No. CW69-14/706-2015E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-24753-3 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2014 Common name Tiny Tassel Scientific name Crossidium seriatum Status Special Concern Reason for designation This very small moss has a very narrow range in Western Canada. It occurs only in the semiarid shrub steppe of four valleys in the Okanagan region of southernmost central British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of North America, Volume 27, 2007
    Campylopus · DICRANACEAE 373 CAMPYLOPUS showing large adaxial hyalocysts, abaxial stereids absent, 13. Campylopus schmidii (Müller Hal.) A. Jaeger, almost smooth at back. Specialized asexual reproduction Thätigk. St. Gallischen Ber. Naturwiss. Ges. 1870–1871: frequently by deciduous stem tips. Sporophytes not 439. 1872 known in North America. Dicranum schmidii Müller Hal., Bot. Soil in tundra habitats; in alpine elevations, 2700–3400 Zeitung (Berlin) 11: 37. 1853; m; Greenland; B.C., Nfld. and Labr. (Nfld.), Yukon; Campylopus aureus Bosch & Sande Alaska, Colo.; Europe; Asia (Bhutan, China, Japan, La Coste Nepal). Plants 2–5 cm, yellowish green, Records of Campylopus schimperi from Mexico and 5 the Andes are doubtful. The taxonomic value of this 5 stiff, evenly foliate, the perichaetia species has often been doubted. It was frequently in comal tufts. Leaves 5–6 mm, regarded as a variety of C. subulatus, which is similar in erect-patent when wet, appressed several respects. Campylopus schimperi, however, has when dry, from oblong base more elongate, distal laminal cells (1:4 instead of 1:1.5– gradually contracted to a long subula, ending in a straight, 2) and abaxially nearly smooth costa (ridged in C. hyaline, serrate tip; alar cells hardly differentiated; basal subulatus). Furthermore, C. schimperi is a species of laminal cells thin-walled, rectangular, hyaline; distal arctic-alpine habitats and C. subulatus is found at low laminal cells chlorophyllose, oval to narrow or elongate 1 2 elevations. These anatomical as well as ecological oval, incrassate; costa filling /2– /3 of leaf width, in differences indicate that C. schimperi should be regarded transverse section showing adaxial hyalocysts as large as as a separate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Ecology of the Moss Genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae)
    Systematics and ecology of the moss genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae) By Benjamin Elias Carter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Brent D. Mishler, Chair Professor Bruce G. Baldwin Professor Chelsea D. Specht Spring 2012 Abstract Systematics and ecology of the moss genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae) By Benjamin Elias Carter Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Brent D. Mishler, Chair Scleropodium is a genus of six species in the Brachytheciaceae. Although they are common in north temperate zones, they have not received monographic treatment in over a century. The aims of this study were to test species circumscriptions within the genus with molecular data, complete a thorough global taxonomic treatment of the genus, and to quantitatively investigate the ecological preferences of the species. A molecular phylogenetic study was conducted using 104 individuals spanning the range of morphological variation and the geographic extent of the genus. Maximum Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses and a statistical parsimony network analysis of ITS and the chloroplast rps4, bsbA2 and trnG regions were performed. Although slight differences were found among analyses, there were six clear molecular groups. Five of these corresponded directly to the species Scleropodium californicum, S. cespitans, S. julaceum, S. obtusifolium and S. touretii. The sixth species, S. occidentale, is new to science and is described here. It is similar in ecology and morphology to S. obtusifolium, but has several diagnostic features in both molecular markers and morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverworts, Mosses and Hornworts of Afghanistan - Our Present Knowledge
    ISSN 2336-3193 Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019 DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2019-0002 Published: online 1 July 2019, print July 2019 Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan - our present knowledge Harald Kürschner & Wolfgang Frey Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan ‒ our present knowledge. – Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019. Abstract: A new bryophyte checklist for Afghanistan is presented, including all published records since the beginning of collection activities in 1839 ‒1840 by W. Griffith till present. Considering several unidentified collections in various herbaria, 23 new records for Afghanistan together with the collection data can be added to the flora. Beside a new genus, Asterella , the new records include Amblystegium serpens var. serpens, Brachythecium erythrorrhizon, Bryum dichotomum, B. elwendicum, B. pallens, B. weigelii, Dichodontium palustre, Didymodon luridus, D. tectorum, Distichium inclinatum, Entosthodon muhlenbergii, Hygroamblystegium fluviatile subsp. fluviatile, Oncophorus virens, Orthotrichum rupestre var. sturmii, Pogonatum urnigerum, Pseudocrossidium revolutum, Pterygoneurum ovatum, Schistidium rivulare, Syntrichia handelii, Tortella inflexa, T. tortuosa, and Tortula muralis subsp. obtusifolia . Therewith the number of species increase to 24 liverworts, 246 mosses and one hornwort. In addition, a historical overview of the country's exploration and a full biogeography of Afghan bryophytes is given. Key words: Bryophytes, checklist, flora, phytodiversity. Introduction Recording, documentation, identification and classification of organisms is a primary tool and essential step in plant sciences and ecology to obtain detailed knowledge on the flora of a country. In many countries, such as Afghanistan, however, our knowledge on plant diversity, function, interactions of species and number of species in ecosystems is very limited and far from being complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal Ecology of Desert Mosses Along Gradients of Elevation, Wildfire Disturbance and Local Niche
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1-2013 Dispersal Ecology of Desert Mosses Along Gradients of Elevation, Wildfire Disturbance and Local Niche Robert Joseph Smith University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Biology Commons, Desert Ecology Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Repository Citation Smith, Robert Joseph, "Dispersal Ecology of Desert Mosses Along Gradients of Elevation, Wildfire Disturbance and Local Niche" (2013). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4478309 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISPERSAL ECOLOGY OF DESERT MOSSES ALONG GRADIENTS OF ELEVATION, WILDFIRE DISTURBANCE AND LOCAL NICHE by Robert Joseph Smith Bachelor
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2013 Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses Rhys A. Wyber University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Wyber, Rhys A., Phylogeny of Three East Antarctic Mosses, Bachelor of Medical Biotechnology Advanced - Honours thesis, , University of Wollongong, 2013. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4646 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey by Keith Bowman
    Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status Keith Bowman, PhD 10/20/2017 Acknowledgements There are many individuals that have been essential to this project. Dr. Eric Karlin compiled the initial annotated list of New Jersey moss taxa. Second, I would like to recognize the contributions of the many northeastern bryologists that aided in the development of the initial coefficient of conservation values included in this guide including Dr. Richard Andrus, Dr. Barbara Andreas, Dr. Terry O’Brien, Dr. Scott Schuette, and Dr. Sean Robinson. I would also like to acknowledge the valuable photographic contributions from Kathleen S. Walz, Dr. Robert Klips, and Dr. Michael Lüth. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. Recommended Citation: Bowman, Keith. 2017. Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Flora of the Czech Republic: Updated Checklist and Red List and a Brief Analysis
    Preslia 84: 813–850, 2012 813 Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis Bryoflóra České republiky: aktualizace seznamu a červeného seznamu a stručná analýza Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) Jan K u č e r a1, Jiří Vá ň a2 & Zbyněk H r a d í l e k3 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ–370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University Prague, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 3Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. – Preslia 84: 813–850. The bryoflora of the Czech Republic is analysed using an updated version of the checklist that includes recent taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. In addition, the baseline data was com- pletely revised using the IUCN 3.1 criteria. The main list includes 863 species of bryophytes (4 hornworts, 207 liverworts and 652 mosses) with 5 additional subspecies and 23 generally recog- nized varieties; 9 additional species are listed as of doubtful taxonomic status and 17 other species are evaluated as of uncertain occurrence. Of the 892 taxa evaluated, 46% qualified for inclusion in Red List categories (40 taxa in category RE, 70 in CR, 88 in EN, 93 in VU, 66 in LR-nt, 24 in DD-va and 30 in DD), while 54% are considered Least Concern (LC).
    [Show full text]