The Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of the Urals, Siberia and Central Asia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of the Urals, Siberia and Central Asia THE HOLY NEW MARTYRS AND CONFESSORS OF THE URALS, SIBERIA AND CENTRAL ASIA Vladimir Moss © Copyright: Vladimir Moss, 2010 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................3 1. HIEROMARTYR HERMOGENES, BISHOP OF TOBOLSK.........................5 2. HIEROMARTYR EPHRAIM, BISHOP OF SELENGINSK .........................19 3. HIEROMARTYR PIMEN, BISHOP OF ALMA-ATA ..................................20 4. HIEROMARTYR ANDRONICUS, ARCHBISHOP OF PERM...................23 5. HIEROMARTYR THEOPHANES, BISHOP OF SOLIKAMSK ..................33 6. HIEROMARTYR SYLVESTER, ARCHBISHOP OF OMSK........................37 7. HIEROMARTYR SERAPHIM, BISHOP OF YEKATERINBURG ..............41 8. HIEROMARTYR METHODIUS, BISHOP OF PETROPAVLOVSK ..........42 9. HIEROMARTYR MARK, BISHOP OF VLADIVOSTOK ............................45 10. HIEROCONFESSOR NICODEMUS, BISHOP OF BARNAUL ................46 11. HIEROCONFESSOR DANIEL, BISHOP OF KIRENSK ............................47 12. HIEROMARTYR PANTELEIMON, BISHOP OF KHABAROVSK .........50 13. HIEROMARTYR BARSANUPHIUS, BISHOP OF VLADIVOSTOK ......56 14. HIEROMARTYR NICETAS, BISHOP OF NIZHNE-TAGIL ....................59 15. HIEROMARTYR ANTHONY, BISHOP OF TROITSK..............................61 16. HIEROMARTYR LEO, BISHOP OF NIZHNE-TAGIL ..............................62 17. HIEROMARTYR GURIAS, ARCHBISHOP OF IRKUTSK .......................64 18. HIEROMARTYR BASSIAN, BISHOP OF SOLIKAMSK...........................67 19. HIEROCONFESSOR ALYPIUS, BISHOP OF OKHTENSK......................68 20. HIEROMARTYR BARLAAM, ARCHBISHOP OF PERM ........................69 21. HIEROMARTYR AMPHILOCHIUS, BISHOP OF KRASNOYARSK .....75 22. HIEROCONFESSOR DOMETIAN, SCHEMA-BISHOP OF TYUMEN ..79 23. HIEROMARTYRS AND MARTYRS OF PERM AND YEKATERINBURG PROVINCES ..........................................................................................................80 24. HIEROMARTYRS AND MARTYRS OF WESTERN SIBERIA...............136 25. HIEROMARTYRS AND MARTYRS OF EASTERN SIBERIA................195 26. HIEROMARTYRS AND MARTYRS OF CENTRAL ASIA.....................220 27. HIEROMARTYRS AND MARTYRS OF THE ALTAI .............................245 INTRODUCTION In 2007 the first volume of the series, The Russian Golgotha: The Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia, was published by Monastery Press, Wildwood, Alberta, Canada. That volume was devoted to the All-Russian Martyrs – that is, the Royal Martyrs and Patriarch Tikhon – and to the Martyrs and Confessors of North-West Russia. This is the fifth volume in the series, and is devoted to the Martyrs and Confessors of the Urals, Siberia and Central Asia. Inevitably, difficult choices have had to be made concerning who should be included, and who excluded, from the lists of martyrs and confessors. I cannot claim to have made the right decisions in all cases. For an authoritative list we shall have to wait for the decision of a future Council of the True Church of Russia. In the meantime, I have been governed by the following main criteria of who is a true martyr or confessor: a) Belonging to the Orthodox Church, and not to any heresy, schism or pseudo-Orthodox grouping; b) Unjust death at the hands of the organs of Soviet power, or unjust imprisonment or exile for a minimum period of three years; c) Canonization by either the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church outside Russia that took place in New York on November 1, 1981, or the Council of the Russian True Orthodox Church that took place in Odessa on November 1, 2009. The main problem in this process of selection has been to distinguish between the true and false confessors of the period 1927 to 1937. In 1927, the deputy of the patriarchal locum tenens, Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky), created a schism in the Russian Church by placing the Church in more or less unconditional submission to Soviet power and the demands of the revolution. Those who separated from him, including many senior hierarchs, were called the True Orthodox Christians, and those who died for their belonging to the True Orthodox Church are undoubtedly martyrs and confessors of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. The question is: what is the status of those who did not separate from Sergius, but who suffered at the hands of Soviet power in this period? The approach adopted here is closely modelled on the words of Metropolitan Cyril of Kazan, one of the senior and most respected of all the Russian hierarchs, who was one of the leaders of True Orthodoxy and himself received the crown of martyrdom in 1937. In 1934, when asked about the sacraments of the “sergianists” – those who followed Metropolitan Sergius – he replied that they were still valid and salvific for those who partook without knowing the sin of Sergius and its destructiveness for the Church. For those who knew, however, he said that communion in the sergianist church was for their condemnation. Three years later, in March, 1937, Metropolitan Cyril was taking a stricter line. Enough time had passed, he said, for people to come to a decision about sergianism, which was in essence a new version of renovationism – the heresy condemned and anathematized by Patriarch Tikhon in 1923… On the basis of Metropolitan Cyril’s words, we have taken the end of the year 1934 as a provisional cut-off point. Those who suffered unjustly at the hands of Soviet power before that point, whether they belonged to the sergianist or to the True Orthodox Church, are counted as having suffered for the true faith and as being martyrs or confessors of the True Church – with the exception of the sergianist hierarchs, who, as being responsible for “rightly dividing the word of truth”, must be considered as having failed in their duty to confess the truth against sergianism, and other leading priests or laymen who quite clearly did know what sergianism was but still remained members of the sergianist church. However, from 1935 – by which time almost all the True Orthodox had in any case been killed, incarcerated or driven underground – those sergianists who suffered at the hands of Soviet power are not counted as martyrs and confessors, including the vast numbers killed in the purges of 1937-38, unless there are clear indications in their biography that they struggled against Soviet power and in this way liberated themselves from the sin of sergianism. Of course, this is a rough criterion which will probably involve the misclassification of some of those who suffered. However, in the absence of a clearly superior criterion, and of a definitive list given by the True Church, it will have to do. May the martyrs and confessors not included here forgive us their omission, and continue notwithstanding to pray for us! Through the prayers of our Holy Fathers, Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us! March 20 / April 2, 2010. Great and Holy Friday. East House, Beech Hill, Mayford, Working, Surrey, England. GU22 0SB. 1. HIEROMARTYR HERMOGENES, BISHOP OF TOBOLSK and those with him Bishop Hermogenes, in the world George Ephraimovich Dolganov, was born on April 25, 1858, in Chersonese province, in the family of a yedinoveriye priest who later became a monk. He received his early and intermediate education in Church academic institutions, and had a classical education in Ananyevo before entering the juridical faculty of Novorossiysk University. On graduating from there, George did a course in the mathematical faculty and listened to lectures in the historico-philosophical faculty. Then, in 1889, he entered the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, graduating in 1893. Being a religious child from his early years, he was helped to make the decisive step in devoting himself to God by Archbishop Nicanor (Brovkovich) of the Chersonese. On November 28, 1890 he was tonsured into monasticism. Then on December 2, 1890 he was ordained to the diaconate, and on March 15, 1892 – to the priesthood. He worked hard as a preacher and took an active part in the circle of student-preachers. He served frequently in the academy church and acquired a large number of admirers, who saw in him a future pillar of the Russian Church. In 1893 he was appointed inspector of the Tiflis theological seminary, where he more than once had to punish the young Stalin. In 1898 he was appointed rector of the seminary with promotion to the rank of archimandrite. In Georgia he founded church schools and assisted the spread of missionary work among the population. On January 14, 1901, in the Kazan cathedral in St. Petersburg, he was consecrated Bishop of Volsk, a vicariate of the Saratov diocese by Metropolitans Anthony (Vadkovsky) of St. Petersburg, Vladimir (Bogoyavlensky) of Moscow and others. In this see he paid particular attention to missionary work. On March 21, 1903 Bishop Hermogenes became Bishop of Saratov, and in the same year was summoned to attend the Holy Synod. He built many churches, sketes, prayer houses and chapels in his diocese. Regular services and chanting according to the typicon was introduced into the monasteries, monks of strict life came from Athos and other places. The bishop attracted many people to missionary work, including many with higher education. There began the publication of brochures and pamphlets on questions of the faith which were widely distributed. The bishop himself led religious readings and discussions on religious subjects outside the services. Bishop Hermogenes took an active part in the struggle against the growing revolutionary fervour. During the disturbances of the 1905 revolution,
Recommended publications
  • Moscow, Russia
    Moscow, Russia INGKA Centres The bridge 370 STORES 38,6 MLN to millions of customers VISITORS ANNUALLY From families to fashionistas, there’s something for everyone meeting place where people connect, socialise, get inspired, at MEGA Belaya Dacha that connects people with inspirational experience new things, shop, eat and naturally feel attracted lifestyle experiences. Supported by IKEA, with more than to spend time. 370 stores, family entertainment and on-trend leisure and dining Our meeting places will meet people's needs & desires, build clusters — it’s no wonder millions of visitors keep coming back. trust and make a positive difference for local communities, Together with our partners and guests we are creating a great the planet and the many people. y w h e Mytischi o k v s la Khimki s o r a Y e oss e sh sko kov hel D RING RO c IR AD h ov Hwy TH S ziast ntu MOSCOW E Reutov The Kremlin Ryazansky Avenue Zheleznodorozhny Volgogradskiy Prospect Lyubertsy Kuzminki y Lyublino Kotelniki w H e o Malakhovka k s v a Dzerzhinsky h s r Zhukovskiy a Teply Stan V Catchment Areas People Distance Kashirskoe Hwy Lytkarino Novoryazanskoe Hwy ● Primary 1,600,000 < 20 km ● Secondary 1,600,000 20–35 km ● Tertiary 3,800,000 35–47 km Gorki Total area: <47 km: 7,000,000 Leninskiye Volodarskogo 55% 25 3 METRO 34 MIN CUSTOMERS BUS ROUTES STATIONS AVERAGE COME BY CAR NEAR BY COMMUTE TIME A region with Loyal customers MEGA Belaya Dacha is located at the heart of the very dynamic population development in strong potential the South-East of Moscow and attracts shoppers from all over Moscow and surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Production Development: Leading Industries
    Yaroslavl region INVESTMENT IN PRODUCTION DEVELOPMENT: LEADING INDUSTRIES CONTENTS The Yaroslavl region 01 The Yaroslavl region: general information 5 02 The Yaroslavl region: economic potential 7 The Yaroslavl region: leading industries 8 03 Leading industries: prospective sectors for localization 04 and technology partnership in the region 11 Ship building and marine equipment 12 Power engineering, electrical and cable industries 16 Engine building 20 Chemical engineering complex 22 CLUSTERS Production of road building and municipal machinery 26 Personnel training and education 30 05 Investment in production development 35 06 Prepared investment projects 35 Investor supporting measures 40 The government of the Yaroslavl region provides facilities for development of real economy industry sectors and for implementation of investment projects focusing on improving industrial competitiveness and export potential. Strengthening cooperation with large state corporations ensures intensive development of high-tech manufacture, innovative ventures and region’s economic development. In recent years the Yaroslavl region has demonstrated a steady industrial production growth; in the first quarter of 2019 industrial production index was almost 123% (102% for Russia). Pharmaceutical cluster enterprises that constantly expand participating companies significantly contribute to the industrial development. Large projects are being implemented in the Yaroslavl region by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, R-Farm, NT Pharma, Vita Pharma and Teva companies. Drug quality test laboratory of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare is to be put in operation in 2019. Last year production of the Ninlaro innovative drug began, promoting Russian pharmaceutical industry to a fundamentally new development level. Previously such drugs were released into civil circulation only in five countries (Japan, France, USA, Germany, and Austria).
    [Show full text]
  • Bayerische Repräsentanz in Der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir
    Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gebiet Wladimir Stand 19.06.2017 Kennzahlen zum Gebiet Wladimir Bevölkerung 1,4 Mio. Einwohner Fläche 29,1 Tsd. km2 Bevölkerungsdichte 48 Einwohner / km2 Hauptstadt Wladimir – 354.800 Einwohner Weitere Städte Kowrow (139.300), Murom (110.100), Alexandrow (59.800) Bruttoregionalprodukt 358 Mrd. Rubel* / ≈ 5,3 Mrd. Euro BIP pro Kopf 256 Tsd. Rubel* / ≈ 3761 Euro Bruttoanlageinvestiti- 78,4 Mrd. Rubel / ≈ 1,2 Mrd. Euro onen Ausländische 17 Mio. Dollar* Direktinvestitionen Arbeitslosigkeit 6,3 % Wichtige Branchen 30 % Verarbeitendes Gewerbe (darunter inkl. 10,3% - Herstellung von Nahrungsmitteln und Ge- tränken, 3,5 – Chemie, 3,5% - Elektrotechnik, Elekt- ronik und Optik, 2,8% - Maschinenbau), 32 % Handel und Dienstleistungen, 8,1 % Verkehr und Kommunikation, 7,3 % Bauwirtschaft, 6,4% Landwirtschaft, 16,2 % Sonstige Branchen. Größte Degtyarev-Werk (Kowrow, Maschinenbau), Industrieunternehmen/ Mondelez Rus (Pokrow, Nahrungsmittelherstel- Steuerzahler lung), Ferrero Russia (Vorscha, Nahrungsmittelherstel- lung), Bayerische Repräsentanz in der Russischen Föderation Gusar (Gus-Khrustalny, Armaturenbau), Rudo (Lakinsk, Herstellung von Getränken), Beko (Kirzhatsch, Herstellung von Haushaltsgerä- ten), Kowrow Electromechanical Plant (Kowrow, Anla- genbau), Askona Vek (Kowrow, Herstellung von Matratzen), Generium (Volginskij, Herstellung von pharmazeu- tischen Grundstoffen), Dow Izolan (Wladimir, chemische Industrie), Rustechnologii (Kowrow, Herstellung von Metall- erzeugnissen),
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY REPORT Sberbank of Russia Open Joint-Stock
    Approved on November , 2013 by the CEO, Chairman of the Executive Board of Sberbank of RussiaOJSC (indicate the issuing credit institution's body that approved the Quarterly Report on Securities) QUARTERLY REPORT for Q3 2013 Sberbank of Russia Open Joint-Stock Company Code of the issuing credit institution:01481-В Location of the issuing credit institution: 19 Vavilova St., Moscow, Moscow, Russia, 117997 (indicate the location (address of the permanent executive body of the issuing credit institution) Information contained in this quarterly report is subject to disclosure pursuant to the laws of the Russian Federation on securities CEO, Chairman of the Executive Board of Sberbank of Russia OJSC __________ H.O. Gref signature November , 2013 Acting Chief Accountant of Sberbank of Russia OJSC of Director of the Accounting and Reporting M. Yu. Department __________ Lukyanova signature November , 2013 Seal of the issuing credit institution Contact person: Deputy Head of the Corporate Secretary Service - Head of the Corporate Work and Information Disclosure Sector - Mikhail Ushakov (indicate position and full name of contact person in the issuing credit institution) Telephone: (495) 505-88-85 Fax: (495) 505-88-84 (indicate the contact person's telephone (fax) number(s)) E-mail address: [email protected] (indicate the contact person's e-mail address (if any)) Address of the Internet page(s) where the information contained in this quarterly report is disclosed: www.sberbank.ru, http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id =3043 8 CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA'n' WATERWAYS
    - The 2018 FIFA World Cup will be the 21st FIFA World Cup, a quadrennial international football tournament contested by the men's national teams of the member associations of FIFA. It is scheduled to take place in Russia from 14 June to 15 July 2018,[2] 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA’n’WATERWAYS after the country was awarded the hosting rights on 2 December 2010. This will be the rst World Cup held in Europe since 2006; all but one of the stadium venues are in European Russia, west of the Ural Mountains to keep travel time manageable. - The nal tournament will involve 32 national teams, which include 31 teams determined through qualifying competitions and Routes from the Five Seas 14 June - 15 July 2018 the automatically quali ed host team. A total of 64 matches will be played in 12 venues located in 11 cities. The nal will take place on 15 July in Moscow at the Luzhniki Stadium. - The general visa policy of Russia will not apply to the World Cup participants and fans, who will be able to visit Russia without a visa right before and during the competition regardless of their citizenship [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_FIFA_World_Cup]. IDWWS SECTION: Rybinsk – Moscow (433 km) Barents Sea WATERWAYS: Volga River, Rybinskoye, Ughlichskoye, Ivan’kovskoye Reservoirs, Moscow Electronic Navigation Charts for Russian Inland Waterways (RIWW) Canal, Ikshinskoye, Pestovskoye, Klyaz’minskoye Reservoirs, Moskva River 600 MOSCOW Luzhniki Arena Stadium (81.000), Spartak Arena Stadium (45.000) White Sea Finland Belomorsk [White Sea] Belomorsk – Petrozavodsk (402 km) Historic towns: Rybinsk, Ughlich, Kimry, Dubna, Dmitrov Baltic Sea Lock 13,2 White Sea – Baltic Canal, Onega Lake Small rivers: Medveditsa, Dubna, Yukhot’, Nerl’, Kimrka, 3 Helsinki 8 4,0 Shosha, Mologa, Sutka 400 402 Arkhangel’sk Towns: Seghezha, Medvezh’yegorsk, Povenets Lock 12,2 Vyborg Lakes: Vygozero, Segozero, Volozero (>60.000 lakes) 4 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 1 2 3 6 7 10 14 15 4,0 MOSCOW, Group stage 1/8 1/4 1/2 3 1 Estonia Petrozavodsk IDWWS SECTION: [Baltic Sea] St.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 21782-RU Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$50 million TO THE Public Disclosure Authorized RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR AN EDUCATION REFORM PROJECT April 30, 2001 Human Development Sector Unit (ECSHD) Russia Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS (ExchangeRate EffectiveApril 24, 2001) Currency Unit = Ruble RUR 1 RUR = US$.034 US$1 = 28.89 FISCALYEAR January 1 to December 31 ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CSIP - CommunitySocial InfrastructureProject EIP - Education Innovation Project ERP - Education Reforn Project FMCA - FinancialManagement Capacity Assessment MOE - Ministry of Education MOF - Ministry of Finance NTF - National Training Foundation PIU - Project Implementation Unit PMR - Project Management Report SOE - Statement of Expenses TA - Technical Assistance Vice President: JohannesF. Linn CountryDirector: Julian F. Schweitzer SectorDirector: AnnetteDixon SectorManager: James Socknat Task Tearn Leader: Mary Canning RUSSIAN FEDERATION EDUCATION REFORM PROJECT CONTENTS A. Project Development Objective Page 1. Project development objective 2 2. Key performance indicators 2 B. Strategic Context 1. Sector-related Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) goal supported by the project 2 2. Main sector issues and Government strategy 4 3. Sector issues to be addressed by the project and strategic choices 6 C. Project Description Summary 1. Project components 8 2. Key policy and institutional reforms supported by the project 9 3. Benefits and target population 10 4. Institutional and implementation arrangements 11 D. Project Rationale 1. Project altematives considered and reasons for rejection 1 3 2. Major related projects financed by the Bank and other development agencies 14 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Game to 9/11
    Air Force Engaging the World Great Game to 9/11 A Concise History of Afghanistan’s International Relations Michael R. Rouland COVER Aerial view of a village in Farah Province, Afghanistan. Photo (2009) by MSst. Tracy L. DeMarco, USAF. Department of Defense. Great Game to 9/11 A Concise History of Afghanistan’s International Relations Michael R. Rouland Washington, D.C. 2014 ENGAGING THE WORLD The ENGAGING THE WORLD series focuses on U.S. involvement around the globe, primarily in the post-Cold War period. It includes peacekeeping and humanitarian missions as well as Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom—all missions in which the U.S. Air Force has been integrally involved. It will also document developments within the Air Force and the Department of Defense. GREAT GAME TO 9/11 GREAT GAME TO 9/11 was initially begun as an introduction for a larger work on U.S./coalition involvement in Afghanistan. It provides essential information for an understanding of how this isolated country has, over centuries, become a battleground for world powers. Although an overview, this study draws on primary- source material to present a detailed examination of U.S.-Afghan relations prior to Operation Enduring Freedom. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. Cleared for public release. Contents INTRODUCTION The Razor’s Edge 1 ONE Origins of the Afghan State, the Great Game, and Afghan Nationalism 5 TWO Stasis and Modernization 15 THREE Early Relations with the United States 27 FOUR Afghanistan’s Soviet Shift and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yeltsin Regime
    THE YELTSIN REGIME K.S. Karol Translated by David Macey Who holds power in Russia? The question seems ridiculous. Since 12 December 1993, the country has had an ultra-presidential constitution and its architect, Boris Yeltsin, supposedly rules virtually unopposed. For a number of reasons that are the subject of fierce controversy in Moscow, he cannot do so. Various explanations have been put forward: his health, his lack of judgement when it comes to choosing his collaborators, or his inability to decide on the right policies. Some are already laying bets that he will not last until his mandate expires in June 1996; others, like Gennady Burbulis hope that he will complete his mandate 'with dignity' and then leave the stage. But does Boris Yeltsin himself have any intention of doing so? The Russian President has surrounded himself with a much larger staff than that of the Central Committee of the defunct CPSU. The President's administration employs 40,000 people and has an annual budget of three billion roubles. It pays the salaries of deputies and senators, the judges of the Constitutional Court and the state prosecutors. Running this little empire is no easy task, particularly in that those who belong to it are not bound together by any party discipline or solidarity. The 'old democrats' who brought Boris Yeltsin to power can be counted on the fingers of one hand. They have been replaced by so-called administrators recruited on the basis of whom they know. Access to 'Tsar Boris' counts for much more than an individual's place in the hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Military Faces “Creeping Disintegration”
    The Russian Military Faces “Creeping Disintegration” DALE R. HERSPRING There were virtually no units which were combat ready in 1997. —Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev lthough often ignored by observers and pundits, the Russian military plays A one of the most important roles of any institution in that society. The reason is that the armed forces are always the last bastion against anarchy and chaos in any political system. And Russia now is on the verge of collapse and anarchy. In taking a closer look at the Russian military and the role it plays in the Rus- sian political system, I divide my observations into three categories. First is the question of the armed forces themselves. It is impossible to discuss the role of the military without understanding how serious the situation is in Moscow’s armed forces. As those who have spent time working in the military or analyzing military issues know, reversing conditions like those that now characterize the Russian armed forces is not easy. It will take considerable time. The lead time on many weapons systems exceeds five years from planning to production. A second issue is the question of whether there is a serious danger that the Rus- sian military will become involved in politics. Finally, there is the question of what the West can do and should be doing at this point vis-à-vis the Russian military. The Situation Facing the Russian Military Despite Defense Minister Marshal Igor Sergeyev’s comment on 19 July 1999, to the effect that Russia’s armed forces are “combat ready, controllable and capable of ensuring the military security of the country,” the fact is that their situation is nothing short of disastrous.1 Equipment is outdated, officers and men are dispir- ited, thousands of the “best and brightest” are leaving, the budget is in shambles, generals have been politicized in a way unknown in the past, and talk of reform is a farce.
    [Show full text]
  • CABRI-Volga Report Deliverable D2
    CABRI-Volga Report Deliverable D2 CABRI - Cooperation along a Big River: Institutional coordination among stakeholders for environmental risk management in the Volga Basin Environmental Risk Management in the Volga Basin: Overview of present situation and challenges in Russia and the EU Co-authors of the CABRI-Volga D2 Report This Report is produced by Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering and the International Ocean Institute with the collaboration of all CABRI-Volga partners. It is edited by the project scientific coordinator (EcoPolicy). The contact details of contributors to this Report are given below: Rupprecht Consult - Forschung & RC Germany [email protected] Beratung GmbH Environmental Policy Research and EcoPolicy Russia [email protected] Consulting United Nations Educational, Scientific UNESCO Russia [email protected] and Cultural Organisation MO Nizhny Novgorod State University of NNSUACE Russia [email protected] Architecture and Civil Engineering Saratov State Socio-Economic SSEU Russia [email protected] University Caspian Marine Scientific and KASPMNIZ Russia [email protected] Research Center of RosHydromet Autonomous Non-commercial Cadaster Russia [email protected] Organisation (ANO) Institute of Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Accounting "Cadaster" Ecological Projects Consulting EPCI Russia [email protected] Institute Open joint-stock company Ammophos Russia [email protected] "Ammophos" United Nations University Institute for UNU/EHS Germany [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Moscow in Russia's Foreign and Security Policy: Role
    Eidgenössische “Regionalization of Russian Foreign and Security Policy” Technische Hochschule Zürich Project organized by The Russian Study Group at the Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research Andreas Wenger, Jeronim Perovic,´ Andrei Makarychev, Oleg Alexandrov WORKING PAPER NO.7 APRIL 2001 The City of Moscow in Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy: Role, Aims and Motivations DESIGN : SUSANA PERROTTET RIOS Moscow enjoys an exceptional position among the Russian regions. Due to its huge By Oleg B. Alexandrov economic and financial potential, the city of Moscow largely shapes the country’s economic and political processes. This study provides an overall insight into the complex international network that the city of Moscow is tied into. It also assesses the role, aims and motivations of the main regional actors that are involved. These include the political authorities, the media tycoons and the major financial-industrial groups. Special attention is paid to the problem of institutional and non-institutional interaction between the Moscow city authorities and the federal center in the foreign and security policy sector, with an emphasis on the impact of Putin’s federal reforms. Contact: Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research ETH Zentrum / SEI CH-8092 Zürich Switzerland Andreas Wenger, head of project [email protected] Jeronim Perovic´ , project coordinator [email protected] Oleg Alexandrov [email protected]; [email protected] Andrei Makarychev [email protected]; [email protected] Order of copies: Center for Security Studies and Conflict Research ETH Zentrum / SEI CH-8092 Zürich Switzerland [email protected] Papers available in full-text format at: http://www.fsk.ethz.ch/ Layout by Marco Zanoli The City of Moscow in Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy: Role, Aims and Motivations By Oleg B.
    [Show full text]