Environmental Impact of Conference Realignment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 5-2015 Environmental Impact of Conference Realignment Bradley Farley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Human Geography Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Farley, Bradley, "Environmental Impact of Conference Realignment" (2015). Master's Theses. 565. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/565 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT by Bradley Farley A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Geography Western Michigan University May 2015 Thesis Committee: Lisa DeChano-Cook, Ph.D., Chair Gregory Veeck, Ph.D. Lucius Hallett IV, Ph.D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT Bradley Farley, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2015 Sports have a large impact on the environment. While leagues and teams are looking at improving their sustainability at stadiums, they also have increased their travel distances. NCAA Division I athletic conferences have recently endured conference realignments. This expanding geographic footprint of these conferences has led to teams having an increased travel distances for all sports. This research investigates the environmental impact of travel distances that conference realignment has had in NCAA Division I athletics, particularly regarding the Power 5 conferences carbon footprint. The research question examined is, based on travel distances, has the carbon footprint of the conferences changed dramatically, from pre-realignment to post-realignment? In order to answer this question, I examined the changes in mean center and average travel distances for each conference pre- and post-alignment. The carbon footprints were then calculated for 2010 and 2014 and the total emission and average emission changes were investigated. Copyright by Bradley Farley 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank my family for all their support, especially my mom and dad. They have always supported me through my academic career. I also want to thank my thesis advisor Dr. DeChano-Cook for helping me with the general research idea and for taking me on as a second year student. I also need to thank my committee members Dr. Greg Veeck and Dr. Lucius Hallett for agreeing to be a part of my research so late in the process. I also want to thank my classmates Alex Ebenstein and Rudy Bartels who made going through this process so much easier. I want to thank the department chair Dr. Benjamin Ofari-Amoah for giving me the opportunity to work as a teaching and research assistant at Western. I want to thank Mary Lou Brooks for the support and always making sure I was signed up for classes on time and having all the answers. Lastly, I want to thank Rebecca Luchies for her support when I was writing and for helping me with edits. Bradley Farley ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………… ii LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………. v LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………… vi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………. 1 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ………………………………………………….. 6 Conference Realignment History ……………………………………… 6 The 2010-2014 Realignment ……………………………………. 8 Reasons for Switching Conference and the Impacts of These Shifts ……………………………………………………... 10 Turmoil in the Big 12 …………………………………………… 13 Carbon Emissions …………………………………………………….. 15 Sports and the Environment ………………………………………….. 21 International Sports …………………………………………….. 21 Professional Sports …………………………………………….. 25 College Athletics ………………………………………………. 29 III. METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………. 32 Study Site ……………………………………………………………. 32 Data Collection ……………………………………………………… 32 Data Analysis………………………………………………………… 33 IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ………………………………………… 36 iii Table of Contents-continued CHAPTER Geographic Centroid Movements ………………………………………. 36 Three- and Five-Hour Drive Times between Games Emissions ……….. 45 Summary ……………………………………………………………….. 51 V. CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………….. 54 Different Approaches ………………………………………………….. 57 Future Research ……………………………………………………….. 57 REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………………. 59 APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………….. 65 A. College City Locations ……………………………………………………. 65 B. Emissions Tables ………………………………………………………….. 69 iv LIST OF TABLES 1. Teams that changed conferences to one of the Power 5 conferences and when the move occurred ………………………………………………………………. 9 2. Distances to geographic centroid in a straight line (kilometers)………………… 39 3. Showing the overall averages for total emissions (Kg of CO2) and percent change per conference …………………………………………………………. 46 4. Showing the overall averages for average emissions (Kg CO2) and percent change per conference…………………………………………………………… 47 5. Number of games that were drivable……………………………………………. 49 6. Average distances for driving between conference games……………………… 51 v LIST OF FIGURES 1. The location of the ACC schools along with the geographic centroid of the conference …………………………………………………………………... 37 2. Showing the spatial distribution and geographic centroids of the Big 12 Conference ……………………………………………………………………… 40 3. Showing the spatial distribution and geographic centroids of the Big Ten Conference ……………………………………………………………………… 42 4. Showing the spatial distribution and geographic centroids of the Pac-12 Conference ……………………………………………………………………… 43 5. Showing the spatial distribution and geographic centroid of the SEC………….. 45 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Professional sports can have large environmental impacts on areas surrounding venues. Sports venues in particular degrade local environments through construction and maintenance. Events at these venues generate large amounts of waste products, which end up in landfills, incinerators, or sewage plants (DeChano & Hruska, 2006). In addition to these on-site issues, professional sports contribute to pollution levels through the transport of fans and teams to the venues. Professional sports leagues across the U.S. have started working on improving the environmental impact of sports. Major League Baseball (MLB) partnered with the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC) in 2005 to establish several environmental initiatives, aimed at improving environmental quality in and around stadiums. MLB also employs software in order to track the success of NRDC programs, monitoring levels of energy use, waste management, recycling, water use and paper purchasing. The Seattle Mariners baseball team saved one million dollars over a three year period from 2006 to 2009 through retrofits such as waterless urinals, a new power-saving scoreboard and other efficiency improvements for electricity, natural gas, water and sewer usage (Henly, Hershkowitz, & Hoover, 2012). Environmental protection and impact mitigation efforts are not limited to MLB. The National Football League (NFL) has also made significant strides to reduce its environmental footprint. For instance, the Philadelphia Eagles have saved over $3 million since 2005 simply through energy, waste, and water reductions (Henly, Hershkowitz, & Hoover, 2012). The Staples Center in Los Angeles, an arena hosting two teams in the 1 National Basketball Association (NBA) and one team in the National Hockey League (NHL), replaced all of their urinals with waterless versions after an audit from the NRDC. This in turn led to an annual savings of $28,200 in direct water costs by saving seven million gallons of water (Henly, Hershkowitz, & Hoover, 2012.). In 2011, the NRDC joined the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) Final Four Sustainability Committee to strategize various initiatives to reduce environmental impacts. At the 2014 NCAA Basketball Final Four, activities included planting 1,014 trees in Arlington, Texas, unveiling a public transportation system for ticket holders to get to the stadium, and a recycling and composting program which managed venue waste during the tournament (Hubbard & Durant, 2014.). While efforts to reduce environmental impacts in and around stadiums and events have been increasing, the added travel by fans and teams due to recent conference expansion and realignments, add to a team’s carbon footprint. Recent changes to some conferences have made them more geographically distributed, increasing distances between schools for all sports. This has led to fiscal budget cuts at some schools in non- revenue sports. For instance, gymnastics at Temple, located in Philadelphia, was cut even though the gymnastics team won many conference titles. Travel costs for all of Temple’s teams have increased dramatically due to league member teams being located from Texas to Connecticut in the American Athletic Conference (Graves, 2013). Until the late 1950s, team travel was not an issue for schools or conferences. Conferences were based upon ease of travel, as teams were geographically closer to each other and traveled by road and rail networks for football and other sports (Abbott, 1990). Conferences defined the region with which they were associated. For example, the Big 2 Ten represented the American Middle West (Abbott, 1990). The popularization of commercial air travel