Circuit City: the Formula of Past Successes Can’T Be Forever

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Circuit City: the Formula of Past Successes Can’T Be Forever This material is exclusively prepared for Ringle Customers Material for your English session Circuit City: The formula of past successes can’t be forever [source: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cover-Story/How-Asian-companies-are-navigating-the-trade-war] 0 본 자료는 저작권 법에 의해 보호되는 저작물로, Ringle 사에 저작권이 존재합니다. 해당 자료에 대한 무단 복제/배포를 금하며, 해당 자료로 수익을 얻거나 이에 상응하는 혜택을 누릴 시 Ringle 과 사전 협의가 없는 경우 고소/고발 조치 될 수 있습니다. This material is exclusively prepared for Ringle Customers [Summary in English] I. Circuit City Circuit City, once the top retailer of electronics in America, failed to adapt to a changing market economy. Clinging to its past successes and old strategies, Circuit City eventually declared bankruptcy in 2008. • Once a Fortune 500 company and America’s leading retailer of electronics, Circuit City (CC) repeatedly failed to address the company’s internal issues and made poor business decisions, ultimately losing out in every aspect to their innovative competitor, Best Buy. CC obstinately persisted in their old formulas for success, not anticipating how quickly e-commerce companies and competing distributors would encroach on their market. Though CC had once been one of the most innovative companies in North America with 1,500 stores across the U.S. and Canada, they filed for bankruptcy protection in 2008. • Having been unable to find a buyer to take over the bankrupt company after a year, CC sold its assets to Systemax for $14M. Systemax also acquired CompUSA and opened tigerdirect.com, after which CC almost completely disappeared into history. In 2015, Systemax sold the Circuit City brand to a distributor named Ronny Shmoel, who began planning for its relaunch. • However, even given two more years, CC still failed to [1] stake a claim in the fiercely competitive market, which had already been all but cornered by Amazon—an absolute powerhouse even then—its surviving competitor Best Buy, and finally Target and Walmart, both of which specialize in certain electronic products. Then on February 15, 2018, at the Las Vegas Consumer Electronics show, Shmoel announced his plans to open a variety of brick- and-mortar CC stores alongside their online sales channel. Opening in 1949 as a TV retailer in tangent with a television broadcasting network, Circuit City was the first to introduce the ‘big box’-style electronics store in the 1970s; it eventually grew into the largest electronics retailer in the U.S. • In 1949, after hearing at his barber shop of plans to open the first TV station, a man named Samuel Wurtzel immediately rented out a local tire store and began selling television sets. Taking the first initials of his family members’ names, he created the Wards Company. Wurtzel both rented space in large discount stores across the United States and opened his own stores, leading to the Wards Company’s rapid growth. 1 본 자료는 저작권 법에 의해 보호되는 저작물로, Ringle 사에 저작권이 존재합니다. 해당 자료에 대한 무단 복제/배포를 금하며, 해당 자료로 수익을 얻거나 이에 상응하는 혜택을 누릴 시 Ringle 과 사전 협의가 없는 경우 고소/고발 조치 될 수 있습니다. This material is exclusively prepared for Ringle Customers • Throughout the 1960s and 70s, Wurtzel kept expanding existing stores and acquiring new stores, continuously bolstering the company. He overtook retailers in various other sectors, including household goods, clothing, automotive products, audio equipment, and furniture. However, the U.S. economy suddenly and drastically shrank following the 1973 oil crisis, and consumer demand plummeted along with it. When they recorded operating losses in 1975, Wards Company withdrew from its slumping retail stores and began to reorganize its portfolio. • In 1977, Wards Company [2] revamped their retail model, now selling famous brands of audio and video devices at larger stores. In 1984, they changed their brand name to Circuit City and went public on the New York Stock Exchange. Beloved by customers, the big-box style store became CC’s trademark, and they rapidly opened a number of new locations. By opening multiple stores all within 500 miles of their distribution centers and by streamlining their fixed costs such as marketing, logistics, and inventory, CC made it nearly impossible for competing retailers to enter the market. Using these strategies, CC was able to achieve the highest market shares in a given region while also exacting higher prices from consumers. II. Winning Strategy Circuit City provided differentiated services, including an extensive range of products, lowest price guarantees, repair services, and a professional staff. Because each store was granted independence in choosing their product offerings while purchasing capabilities were centrally integrated, CC was able to simultaneously achieve economy of scale and offer local specials. • CC used more than half of its locations for retail, storing most of its inventory in separate warehouses. Customers were able to browse various electronic goods with the assistance of sales staff in a spacious and pleasant environment, and if they made a purchase, they would go to a pick-up location to retrieve their purchased products. Customers went wild about CC stores, where they could handle a wide variety of brand name products and receive expert assistance from CC employees. • With their lowest price guarantee, CC offered a 110% payout for customers who found and reported lower prices elsewhere for the same products. Along with CC’s strategy of opening multiple stores in the same region to cut off competitors, at a time when it was not possible to [3] scour the internet for transparent prices, it was very difficult for customers to find lower prices than what CC offered, whether or not those prices were actually the lowest. This system was a highly effective sales tactic for CC. 2 본 자료는 저작권 법에 의해 보호되는 저작물로, Ringle 사에 저작권이 존재합니다. 해당 자료에 대한 무단 복제/배포를 금하며, 해당 자료로 수익을 얻거나 이에 상응하는 혜택을 누릴 시 Ringle 과 사전 협의가 없는 경우 고소/고발 조치 될 수 있습니다. This material is exclusively prepared for Ringle Customers • CC created service centers inside their stores which provided repair services and kept customers coming back. The head office consolidated product purchases for all stores, thereby minimizing the unit purchase price, but gave each individual store discretion to determine the types and prices of products to be sold according to local demand. CC also incentivized its employees to make sales by paying commissions. When sales declined due to the economic recession and credit restrictions, CC established its own bank, issuing credit cards to customers and expanding its stores aggressively to maintain their market share in the face of stiffening competition. • For the 40 years following the mid-1970s, middle-class income in the U.S. remained within the same range while various expenses, such as healthcare, steadily increased. despite the continuous decline of American consumers’ disposable income, consumption and consumer debt increased with mechanized vigor during the same period. • Because many consumer electronic products are purchased by means of debt (credit cards or loans), interest rates have a significant influence on product sales. during the recession, credit card companies and lenders raised interest rates while reducing the availability of loans, which led to drops in sales for retailers such as CC. Technology is also a critical factor—when a new product emerges, retailers can, for the first few years, maintain a monopoly and exact high prices for it, but as the product becomes common over time, the price drops. These elements make the consumer electronics sector particularly volatile. • In 1990, interest rates soared to 11.5%, and Barclays, which had previously provided credit to CC’s customers, limited lending. At the same time, Best Buy eliminated their warehouse storage system and loaded all of their products into their retail stores, posting detailed instructions and information on displays. With the introduction of their new ‘low service, low price’ concept, Best Buy cut back on their employees, significantly reducing sales and administrative expenses and eliminating employee commissions. • CC on the other hand, continued to expand aggressively in the same manner it had in the past, attempting to keep its hold on the market through the economic downturn by establishing its own bank and issuing credit cards to customers. But with the emergence of specialized retailers such as Home depot, and with the entry of retailers like Wal-Mart into the consumer electronics field, competition was intensifying. CC tried to maintain its market share by opening 30-40 new stores every year despite the recession and competition, and its profitability continued to steadily decline. 3 본 자료는 저작권 법에 의해 보호되는 저작물로, Ringle 사에 저작권이 존재합니다. 해당 자료에 대한 무단 복제/배포를 금하며, 해당 자료로 수익을 얻거나 이에 상응하는 혜택을 누릴 시 Ringle 과 사전 협의가 없는 경우 고소/고발 조치 될 수 있습니다. This material is exclusively prepared for Ringle Customers III. The Fall of Circuit City Thanks to the popularization of PCs, Circuit City did manage to briefly reach an unprecedented level of growth. Following the formula of its past successes, CC continued to streamline its assets by expanding stores, diversifying its fields of business, and selling real estate. • With the advent of PCs and the growth of the music industry, CC had reached a new point of change in its growth by 1992. Previously, by economizing its scale and forestalling competition by opening several stores in one area, they had been able to open more than 50 stores each year. To foster that growth, CC first monetized its assets by selling or leasing its properties, then expanded its advertising and promotional operations. • With an eye towards long-term growth, CC attempted to diversify its businesses.
Recommended publications
  • Shirking, Opportunism, Self-Delusion and More: the Agency Problem Today Jayne W
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2013 Shirking, Opportunism, Self-Delusion and More: The Agency Problem Today Jayne W. Barnard William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Barnard, Jayne W., "Shirking, Opportunism, Self-Delusion and More: The Agency Problem Today" (2013). Faculty Publications. 1720. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1720 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs SHIRKING, OPPORTUNISM, SELF-DELUSION AND MORE: THE AGENCY PROBLEM LIVES ON Jayne W. Barnard* One would think, after nearly a century of effort to limit the self-serving and wealth-destroying practices of corporate executives and their board of directors, Americans could finally feel confident that the goals of corporate leaders were now fully aligned with those of their investors.' We should now be able to observe these men and women acting with integrity, diligence, and grace. Investor anxiety about shirking, opportunism, self-promotion, and outsized greed should be, one would think, an artifact of the past. Alas, we cannot say we have achieved that enlightened state of affairs. It is still all too possible to find evidence of executive sloth, corruption, mendacity, and hubris. All the gatekeepers, media scoldings, scholarly inquiries, and judicial sermons aimed at curbing the agency problem have failed to restrain the worst in human impulses. Should we be surprised? In thinking about the failures of the law and the culture of business to counteract the predictable weaknesses (and sometimes worse) of human beings, several high-profile examples quickly come to mind: Richard Fuld of Lehman Brothers, Jon Corzine of MF Global Holdings, Ken Lewis of Bank of America, Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide Financial, Aubrey McClendon of Chesapeake Energy, and Rajat Gupta of McKinsey and Goldman Sachs.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:14-Cr-20854-JEM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/11/2015 Page 1 of 26
    Case 1:14-cr-20854-JEM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/11/2015 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE № 14-20854-CR-MARTINEZ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. GILBERT FIORENTINO, Defendant, ___________________________/ DEFENDANT GILBERT FIORENTINO’S RESPONSE TO THE PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND REQUEST FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SENTENCE The Defendant, GILBERT FIORENTINO, by and through his undersigned counsel, and pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1.2-3, p.s., Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 (d), (e)(2) and (f), and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution, respectfully file this Response to the Presentence Investigation Report (hereafter “PSR”) and Request for an Alternative Sentence, and as grounds therefore state as follows: I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to U.S. v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the federal sentencing process has adopted a three-step approach. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(M), amended December 1, 2007, U.S. v. Pugh, 515 F.3d 1179 (11th Cir. 2008); and, most recently, Amendment 741 of the Sentencing Guidelines, effective November 1, 2010. First, the Court is to resolve any disputed guideline issues and determine the advisory guideline range. In MR. FIORENTINO’S case, the parties agree that pursuant to paragraphs 9 and 10 of the written Plea Agreement § 2B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines is the applicable guideline. Therefore, the base offense level in this case is 6, which is increased based upon the Page 1 of 26 Law Offices of Samuel J. Rabin, Jr., P.A., 800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1400, Miami, FL 33131, Telephone (305) 358-1064 Case 1:14-cr-20854-JEM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/11/2015 Page 2 of 26 amount of loss, the use of sophisticated means and MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemax Inc
    SYSTEMAX INC FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 04/01/02 for the Period Ending 12/31/01 Address 11 HARBOR PARK DR PORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050 Telephone 5166087000 CIK 0000945114 Symbol SYX SIC Code 5961 - Catalog and Mail-Order Houses Industry Retail (Catalog & Mail Order) Sector Services Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2008, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 1-13792 SYSTEMAX INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 11-3262067 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 22 HARBOR PARK DRIVE PORT WASHINGTON, NEW YORK 11050 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (516) 608-7000 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON TITLE OF EACH CLASS WHICH REGISTERED ------------------- ----------------- Common Stock, par value $ .01 per share New York Stock Exchange SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilbert Fiorentino
    Case 1:14-cr-20854-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 12TB Nov 20, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SO UTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLO RIDA 14-20854-CR-COOKE/TORRES CASE NO . 18 U.S.C. j 371 18 U.S.C. j 981(a)(1)(C) UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA VS. GILBERT FIORENTINO , Defendant. / INFO RM ATION The United States Attorney charges that: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS At times material to this Infonnation: Systemax, lnc. (ltsystemax'') was a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business inPort W ashington, New York. Systemax sold personal computers and other consumer electronics through its websites, retail stores and direct mail catalogs. In tiscal year 2010, Systemax had annual sales revenue of approximately $3.6 billion. Systemax was a public company and its comm on stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange . Systemax was an issuer with a clmss of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and it was obligated to tile reports with the U .S. Securities and Exchange Commission ($1SEC'') pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. TigerDirect was a subsidiary of Systemax with its principal place of business in M iami, Florida. TigerDirect was a part of the Technology Products Group ($1TPG'') of Case 1:14-cr-20854-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 2 of 12 Systemax. TPG marketed and sold technology products under several brand names, including TigerDirect, COmPUSA, and Circuit City. Defendant GILBERT FIORENTINO was a resident of Miami, Florida, the Chief Executive Officer of TPG and TigerDirect, and a member of the Board of Directors of Systemax.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemax Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 1-13792 Systemax Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 11-3262067 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 11 Harbor Park Drive Port Washington, New York 11050 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 608-7000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $ .01 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemax Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13792 Systemax Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 11-3262067 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 11 Harbor Park Drive Port Washington, New York 11050 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 608-7000 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit City's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies College of Law Student Work Spring 2013 Circuit City's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Jeff Smith Peyton Hairston Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy Part of the Bankruptcy Law Commons, and the Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Jeff and Hairston, Peyton, "Circuit City's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy" (2013). Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_studlawbankruptcy/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Student Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Circuit City’s Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Jeff Smith* Peyton Hairston** * J.D. candidate, University of Tennessee College of Law, class of 2014. ** J.D. candidate, University of Tennessee College of Law, class of 2013. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 A. Circuit City’s New Business Style .................................................................................................... 5 1. The Quick Expansion of Circuit City ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 18 U.S.C. J 1349 26 U.S.C. J 7201 18 U.S.C. J 981(A)(1)(C) Systemax, Inc
    Case 1:14-cr-20025-JEM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 11 NOV 20, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-20025-CR-JEM (s)(s) 18 U.S.C. j 1349 26 U.S.C. j 7201 18 U.S.C. j 981(a)(1)(C) UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA VS. CARL FIORENTINO, Defendant. / SECONP SVPERSEDING INFORM ATION The United States Attorney charges that: GENER AL ALLEGATIONS At times material to this Second Superseding lnform ation: Systemax, Inc. (t%systemax'') was a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Port W ashington, New York. Systemax sold personal computers and other consumer electronics through its websites, retail stores and direct mail catalogs. ln tiscal year 2010, Systemax had annual sales revenue of approximately $3.6 billion. Systemax was a public company and its common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Systemax was an issuer with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Sectuities and Exchange Act of 1934, and it was obligated to file reports with the U .S. Securities and Exchange Commission ($çSEC'') pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. 1 of 11 Case 1:14-cr-20025-JEM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2014 Page 2 of 11 2. TigerDirect was a subsidiary of Systemax with its principal place of business in Miami, Florida. TigerDirect was a part of the Teclmology Products Group ($tTPG'') of Systemax. TPG marktted and sold technology products under several brand names, including TigerDirect, CompUSA, and Circuit Uity.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemax Inc
    SYSTEMAX INC FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 04/15/05 for the Period Ending 12/31/04 Address 11 HARBOR PARK DR PORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050 Telephone 5166087000 CIK 0000945114 Symbol SYX SIC Code 5961 - Catalog and Mail-Order Houses Industry Retail (Catalog & Mail Order) Sector Services Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2008, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 1-13792 Systemax Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 11-3262067 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 11 Harbor Park Drive Port Washington, New York 11050 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (516) 608-7000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on Title of each class which registered Common Stock, par value $ .01 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Doralee J. Mendez
    DORALEE J . MENDEZ C REA T IVE D ESIGNER PROFILE W O R K E X PERI E N C E 305.772.4269 THE BASS Design Coordinator Miami Beach, FL • October 2018 - Present [email protected] Art direct and design both digital and various print collateral for education programs, special events, exhibitions and advertising. Work with marketing manager to maintain website content creation, digital newsletter and budget. blackrabbitcreative.co 11 USA GROUP Graphic Designer EDUC A T ION Miami , FL • April - October 2018 Create collateral for a multi-function event/club space. Work with art director and marketing to ensure collateral meets entertainers, vendor and sponsor standards. Collateral includes but is not limited to flyers, digital newsletters, car wraps, web and social media advertisements. Bachelor’s Degree in Graphic Design WHOLE FOODS MARKET | FLORIDA REGION Ai Miami International Miami Metro Area Junior Art Director University of Art & Design Miami , FL • October 2016 - April 2018 2005-2008 Travel among all six Miami-Dade county store locations and assist in-store Artists complete and implement any and all projects and programs. Advise, train and art direct new in-store artists in their ever changing and fast paced position to ensure brand standards are upheld. Install wraps, clings, and stickers to various fixtures at the store level and/or sending print ready files to printers for out-of-house instillation when necessary. Worked closely with Florida Regional I NTERES T S Marketing on new store openings doing both digital design, print advertisements, large format printing and chalk work. & H O BBI E S WHOLE FOODS MARKET | FLORIDA REGION Store Graphic Artist Miami , FL • May 2011 - October 2016 Worked as in-house artist for both South Beach and Downtown Miami locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Funds Annual Report August 31, 2020
    Annual Report | August 31, 2020 Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Funds Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund See the inside front cover for important information about access to your fund’s annual and semiannual shareholder reports. Important information about access to shareholder reports Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of your fund’s annual and semiannual shareholder reports will no longer be sent to you by mail, unless you specifically request them. Instead, you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted on the website and will be provided with a link to access the report. If you have already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and do not need to take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the fund electronically by contacting your financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or bank) or, if you invest directly with the fund, by calling Vanguard at one of the phone numbers on the back cover of this report or by logging on to vanguard.com. You may elect to receive paper copies of all future shareholder reports free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact the intermediary to request that you continue to receive paper copies. If you invest directly with the fund, you can call Vanguard at one of the phone numbers on the back cover of this report or log on to vanguard.com.
    [Show full text]
  • PURSUANT to the Provisions of Chapter 501 , Part II of the Florida
    STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: Case No. L14-3-1081 SYSTEMAX, INC. and TIGERDIRECT, INC. Respondents --------------------I ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE I. PURSUANT to the provisions of Chapter 501 , Part II of the Florida Statutes, Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), the Office of The Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the "Department"), caused an investigation to be made into certain acts and practices of Systemax, Inc. and Tiger Direct, Inc. (collectively hereinafter, "Respondents"). 2. Respondent Tiger Direct, Inc. ("TD") is a Florida corporation with its mailing address and principal place of business registered at 7795 West Flagler Street, Suite 35, Miami, Florida 33144. TD is a reseller of various products including, but not limited to, electronics, computers and computer related goods, and markets and resells those products through its online consumer shopping website, TigerDirect.com (the "Website") and other sales channels, including its 1 Initials a:- three remaining retail stores located in Jefferson, Georgia; Miami, Florida; and Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. 3. The Website operates under a registered Trademark owned by TD. 4. Respondent Systemax, Inc. ("Systemax") is a Delaware Corporation with its mailing address and principal place of business registered at 11 Harbor Park Drive, Port Washington, New York 11050. Systemax is the ultimate parent company of Respondent TD. 5. Respondents make no admission that Respondents violated FDUTPA or any other law, statute or regulation applicable to Respondents or enforced by the Department (collectively, the "Acts"), and have timely complied with the Department's requests for information and have been fully cooperative during the Department's investigation.
    [Show full text]