DOCSLIB.ORG

Argo: Voyage Through the Outer Solar System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Argo: Voyage Through the Outer Solar System Neptune: the gateway to the Kuiper Belt Innovative Mission Concept Argo for New Frontiers 04 • Fly by a Trojan (no Jupiter GA) or Jupiter • Gravity assist from Saturn Voyage Through the • Fly by Neptune/Triton system Outer Solar System • Fly by a scientifically-selected Kuiper Belt Object Key Characteristics Candice Hansen (JPL) • Focused science mission Heidi B. Hammel (Space Science Institute) • Simple mission profile • Current instrument technology (NH) with Don Banfield (Cornell), Amanda Hendrix (JPL), Krishan Khurana (UCLA), Damon Landau (JPL), • Current spacecraft technology (NH) Alfred McEwen (U. Arizona), Linda Spilker (JPL), • Capable payload Tom Spilker (JPL), John Stansberry (U. Arizona), Ed Stone (Caltech) , Nathan Strange (JPL) • Radioisotope power Argo and Decadal Priorities Argo and Decadal Priorities NOSSE Report: "Opening New Frontiers in Space: Choices for the Next New Frontiers Announcement of Opportunity" • Planetary Decadal Survey also explicitly mentions In order for the New Frontiers Program to remain healthy over the long run, Neptune/Triton in multiple chapters it must maintain an influx of new ideas and grow the applicant pool for new missions. – Giant Planets, Large Satellites, Primitive Bodies Selected New A. Kuiper Belt – Pluto Explorer Innovative Mission Concepts • Neptune in far future because Flagship-class orbiter assumed B. Jupiter! Polar Orbiter with Probes • mission options outside the 3 remaining and 5 additional medium-sized! decadal 1975 1985 1995 2005 Three Remaining missions 1. South Pole-Aitkin Basin Sample Return Voyager 1 Cassini Pioneer 11 2. Venus In Situ Explorer • spurred by major scientific and Voyager 2 Orbiter technological developments made since 3. Comet Surface Sample Return the decadal survey! Five Additional • offer potential to dramatically advance fundamental scientific goals of the 4. Mars Network Science Pioneer 10 Voyager 1 Galileo New ! Cassini 5. Trojan/Centaur Reconnaissance decadal survey Pioneer 11Voyager 2 Orbiter Horizons 6. Asteroid! Rover/Sample Return • accomplish scientific investigations well 7. Io Observer beyond! the scope of the Discovery 8. Ganymede Observer != Argo program Argo Neptune Flyby is Crucial Access to Kuiper Belt Objects Argo’s accessible KB volume is ~4000x that of New Horizons The Neptune flyby enables the opportunity to: New Horizons cone of accessibility, Kuiper Belt Objects without propulsive assistance, visit a Trojan would be 1/4 the diameter of the period at the end of this swing past Saturn sentence. fly by Neptune/Triton New Horizons, ~0.9° with propulsive assistance AND continue on to a KBO Carolyn Collins Petersen, and Richard Wright for Gemini Observatory Argo without Potentially in the Argo cone: propulsive assistance ~60° The Neptune flyby also 18 Cold Classical KBOs permits selection of the 40 KBOs with 200 < D < 400 km Neptune-to-KBO flight times 9 KBOs with D > 400 km (large KBOS) Neptune are ~1.5-3 years KBO with highest scientific interest Graphic created by Mark Petersen, several binary KBOs (KBO at 35-39 AU) Compelling Neptune science Argo Science Opportunities • Planetary System Architecture Fundamental New Science – Exoplanet population increasing – Comparative planetology of multiple KBOs: Pluto (large in situ), NH's KBO, dramatically Argo's Triton (captured), Argo's KBO (scientifically-selected) • Growing number of – First surface geology of a Trojan ice-giant-mass objects – First detailed images of Neptune's atmosphere in a new season • Pushing towards U/N equivalent – First detailed images of Triton's atmosphere after significant change distances in near future – First measurement of stability of an offset/tilted magnetic field – Microlensing – Near-IR radial velocity – First detailed images of Neptune's ring system in new dynamical state – Knowledge of local ice giants Incremental Science Engages a significant fraction of extremely limited – Ice giant interior measurements the planetary community • Earth-based efforts extraordinarily challenging compared to J & S – Small satellite science – Ice giants smaller – Ice giants much more distant Significant small icy body science as per decadal objectives – Ice giants colder Adapted from the ExoPlanet Task Force Presentation to the AAS, Austin, TX (Jan 2008) Progress on decadal Neptune science objectives – No currently planned mission to Neptune until an orbiter >2045 Sets the stage for a future Neptune System Flagship Orbiter Argo will set the stage for a future orbiter Achievable within New Frontiers resources Why New Frontiers 04? Argo Launch Windows for Fast Flights • Preliminary • Launch options between 2017 and 2020 – Such windows occur every 12 years due to giant-planet gravity assist • Searched 2013-2027 • Two criteria • Neptune flagship orbiter precludes a KBO flyby (and likely no Trojan) V! <17 km/sec at Neptune arrival Time of Flight <10 yrs • Fills in the >50-year observational gap of a dynamic system – Will enable linking of future flagship to past flyby Both criteria met – The season has already changed on Neptune (solstice was 2005) Criteria not met – Loss of expertise from Voyager-era scientists from the 1989 Neptune flyby FF launch window ~2 yrs long The next window opens in 2027 • Exoplanetary Neptunes are now known to exist – Knowledge of local ice giants is substantially less than gas giants Mission Trip Time V! (km/sec) Argo w/ JGA 8-10 yrs 12 - 16 Voyager 12 yrs 17 New Horizons 9.5 yrs 14 Outer Solar System Exploration: Current Plan Sample Trojan-Triton-KBO trajectories 2005 2015 2025 2035 New Horizons Neptune Flagship? Cassini Orbiter A531/Bi-prop = 755 kg (delivered mass at KBO) A531/Bi-prop = 720 kg (delivered mass at KBO) Trojan: 2001 TW148, D ~ 20 km Trojan: Deikoon, D ~ 50 km Juno OP Triton: flyby alt 500 km at V = 13 km/s Trojan/Centaur Flyby? ! Triton: flyby alt 735 km at V! = 13 km/s Orbiter Flagship KBO: 2001 QX297, D ~ 150–350 km KBO: 2005 TB190, D ~ 250–600 km Cold Classical Large KBO Trojan trajectories increase flight time, e.g., from 10 yrs to 13+ yrs Outer Solar System Exploration with Argo 2005 2015 2025 2035 New Horizons KBO Flyby 2038 Neptune/Triton Neptune Flyby 2032 Flagship? BACK UP CHARTS Argo NF04 Cassini Orbiter Saturn Flyby 2024 Juno OP Trojan Flyby 2023 Orbiter Flagship or !!!!!Jupiter Flyby 2023 Argo dates notional - still under study Of $1B Boxes and Bricks Argo Mission Concept Team “I heard that a joint NASA study by JPL and APL said NASA couldn’t send any mission to the outer Solar System for less than $1B.” This is wrong. • Principal Investigator (PI): Candice Hansen, Triton science The “Titan and Enceladus $1B Mission Feasibility Study” actually said: Pg 1-1: “no missions to Titan or Enceladus that achieve at least a moderate understanding • Deputy PI: Heidi Hammel, Neptune science beyond Cassini-Huygens were found to fit within the cost cap of 1 billion dollars (FY’06).” Relevance to Neptune: None • Project Scientist: Linda Spilker, ring science • Senior Science Advisor: Ed Stone “But I also heard that the study said NASA couldn’t even send a BRICK • Co-Investigator: John Stansberry, KBO science (spacecraft with no instruments) to the outer Solar System for less than $800M.” This is only partially correct. • Co-Investigator: Krishan Khurana, magnetospheric science CORRECT Pg 1-11: “Even the lowest cost mission studied [Enceladus flyby], without the cost of science payload, has a minimum expected cost of ~$800M.” • Mission Architect: Tom Spilker HOWEVER Pg 2-4: “[The Enceladus flyby’s] design (and therefore cost) was uniquely derived using actual cost data from the NH mission.” • Trajectory Design: Nathan Strange Neptune cost mitigators: Can use an Atlas 541 instead of a 551. Do not require Star-48 upper stage. Other savings under study. • Instrument Leads: Alfred McEwen, Don Banfield, Amanda Result: $$ available for Argo science payload within $800M cap Hendrix Past, Present, and Future of Outer Solar System Exploration Argo Science Objectives 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 New Horizons Nearly all aspects of the Neptune system detectable from Earth have changed significantly since Voyager fly-by in 1989 Voyager 2 • Neptune's atmosphere shows fundamental differences in large- Voyager 2 scale structure – No Vgr GDS, significant atmospheric evolution on <5-yr timescale; evidence Voyager 1 Cassini for stratospheric heating since Voyager Pioneer 11 Voyager 2 Orbiter Neptune Measurement Goals – Small-scale cloud distribution – Atmospheric lightning – Magnetic field measurements in completely different Pioneer 10 Voyager 1 Galileo New Juno orientation Pioneer 11Voyager 2 Cassini OPF Orbiter Horizons Orbiter – First detailed compositional/spectral map – First detailed infrared map – Gravitational moments refined for interior models Argo Science Objectives Argo Science Objectives - Triton Nearly all aspects of the Neptune system detectable from Earth Map regions of Triton seen only from a distance by Voyager ("terra have changed significantly since Voyager fly-by in 1989 obscura") -- as well as more of Triton's northern hemisphere -- in order to extend the post-capture cratering history and reveal surface modification. Ring system science objectives (plus small satellites) • More of Triton's northern hemisphere will be sunlit – Most of it was in seasonal darkness for Voyager • The ring system has changed Terminator in 2027 Terra incognita – Arcs evolved within <8 yrs timeframe: 60° Terminator in 1989 VGR era: 45° • Neptune’s Magnetosphere – Very complex and Terra Terra undetectable from Earth obscura obscura Argo
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neptune's Wandering Hot Pole
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 12, EGU2010-2553, 2010 EGU General Assembly 2010 © Author(s) 2010 Neptune’s Wandering Hot Pole Glenn Orton (1), Leigh Fletcher (2), Padma Yanamandra-Fisher (3), Tom Geballe (4), Heidi Hammel (5), Takuya Fujiyoshi (6), Therese Encrenaz (7), Mark Hofstadter (3), Olivier Mousis (8), and Tetsuharu Fuse (6) (1) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA ([email protected], 001 818 3934619), (2) Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom, (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA, (4) Gemini Observatory, Hilo, Hawaii, USA, (5) Space Science Institute, Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA, (6) Subaru Telescope, Nat’l. Optical Obs. of Japan, Hilo, Hawaii, USA, (7) Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France, (8) Observatorie de Besancon, Besancon, France Images of stratospheric emission from Neptune obtained in 2006 at ESO’s Very Large Telescope (Orton et al., 2007, A&A 473, L5) revealed a near-polar hot spot near 70 deg. S latitude that was detectable in different filters sampling both methane (∼7-micron) and ethane (∼12-micron) emission from Neptune’s stratosphere. Such a feature was not present in 2003 Keck and 2005 Gemini North observations: these showed only a general warming trend towards Neptune’s pole that was longitudinally homogeneous. Because of the paucity of longitudinal sampling in the 2003, 2005 and 2006 images, it was not clear whether the failure to see this phenomenon in 2003 and 2005 was simply the result of insufficient longitudinal sampling or whether the phenomenon was truly variable in time. To unravel these two possibilities, we proposed for time on large telescopes that were capable of resolving Neptune at these wavelengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Imaging for Amateurs an International Community of Space
    Planetary Close-ups emily lakdawalla Spacecraft Imaging for Amateurs An international community of space This is Mars’s Big Sky Country, a windswept, nearly featureless plain. Tiny ripples in the rust-colored sand march farther than the eye can see, to a horizon so fl at one might be able to see the curvature of the planet. As far as anyone knows, those ripples have not budged in eons. But all is not still; gaze upward, and you might be surprised by the rapid motion overhead, where feathery cirrus clouds, frosty with bright crystals of water ice, fl oat on high Martian winds. The scene is from Meridiani Planum, composed from eight images captured by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity just before she reached a deep crater named Victoria, on the 950th Martian day of her mission. But the beautiful image was not created by anyone on the Mars Exploration Rover team; no scientist would likely have Earthbound produced it, because it owes its beauty as much to art as it observers never does to science. see Mars as a The image is the collaborative creation of a whole crescent, but amateur-imagesmith community; six people, each from spacecraft do. a diff erent country, had a hand in it. Twelve hours after The author cre- Opportunity took the photos, the data had been received on ated this view Earth and posted to the internet. Within another 17 hours, from six images rover fans had found the photos, assembled the mosaic, taken by Viking and shaded the sand and sky based on color photos Oppor- Orbiter 2 in tunity had taken of a similar landscape the day before.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 - Issue 3 When You’Re on the Job, It’S Important to Have the Right Tools
    2014 - ISSUE 3 WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS. Anchor Checking. ■ Free worldwide ATMs* ■ Free iPhone® and Android® apps Only from ■ Free online banking, mobile ■ Free domestic incoming wires and Camden National Bank. banking and bill pay cashier’s checks — and more! Wherever you are in the world, you can count on Camden National Bank every step of the way. Visit one of our 44 branches statewide or online at CamdenNational.com to open your account today. *Unlimited refunds when using a non-Camden National Bank ATM in the United States per withdrawal. Accept the disclosure fee and we will refund the surcharge. For ATM transactions outside the United States, Puerto Rico, or U.S. Virgin Islands, we will refund the ATM fee if you bring in the ATM receipt showing the surcharge within 90 days of the transaction. CNBRB_MMAAnchorCheckingAd_PRINT_110714.indd 1 11/7/14 3:10 PM Content MARINER STAFF IN THIS ISSUE Director of College Relations Jennifer DeJoy / [email protected] 26 Editor Laurie Stone / [email protected] Designer & Production Editor Deanna Yocom / [email protected] Ad Representative Deanna Yocom / [email protected] AdministratiON President Dr. William J. Brennan Provost & V. P. for Academic Affairs Meet Emily Wyman ’17. Photo by D Sinclair. Dr. David M. Gardner V. P. for Enrollment Management Dr. Elizabeth True FEatURES V.P. for Operations Dr. Darrell W. Donahue 8 Money:Top Rankings Chief Financial Officer 18 Above & Beyond James Soucie WHEN YOU’RE ON THE JOB, IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TOOLS.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Universe to Discover: a Guide to Careers in Astronomy
    A New Universe to Discover A Guide to Careers in Astronomy Published by The American Astronomical Society What are Astronomy and Astrophysics? Ever since Galileo first turned his new-fangled one-inch “spyglass” on the moon in 1609, the popular image of the astronomer has been someone who peers through a telescope at the night sky. But astronomers virtually never put eye to lens these days. The main source of astronomical data is still photons (particles of light) from space, but the tools used to gather and analyze them are now so sophisticated that it’s no longer necessary (or even possible, in most cases) for a human eye to look through them. But for all the high-tech gadgetry, the 21st-Century astronomer is still trying to answer the same fundamental questions that puzzled Galileo: How does the universe work, and where did it come from? Webster’s dictionary defines “astronomy” as “the science that deals with the material universe beyond the earth’s atmosphere.” This definition is broad enough to include great theoretical physicists like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking as well as astronomers like Copernicus, Johanes Kepler, Fred Hoyle, Edwin Hubble, Carl Sagan, Vera Rubin, and Margaret Burbidge. In fact, the words “astronomy” and “astrophysics” are pretty much interchangeable these days. Whatever you call them, astronomers seek the answers to many fascinating and fundamental questions. Among them: *Is there life beyond earth? *How did the sun and the planets form? *How old are the stars? *What exactly are dark matter and dark energy? *How did the Universe begin, and how will it end? Astronomy is a physical (non-biological) science, like physics and chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Kit: Aquarius/SAC-D Launch
    PRESS KIT/JUNE 2011 Aquarius/SAC-D Launch Contents Media Services Information. 5 Quick Facts .................................................................6 Mission Overview .............................................................7 Why Study Ocean Surface Salinity? .............................................15 Science Goals and Objectives . 22 Spacecraft .................................................................23 Instruments ................................................................ .27 Program/Project Management ..................................................33 Media Contacts Steve Cole Policy/Program 202-358-0918 NASA Headquarters, Management [email protected] Washington Alan Buis Aquarius Mission 818-354-0474 NASA Jet Propulsion [email protected] Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Laura Sarrate Aquarius/SAC-D 011 54 03547 431 075 Comisión Nacional de Observatory [email protected] Actividades Espaciales (CONAE) Jessica Rye Launch Vehicle 321-730-5646 United Launch Alliance [email protected] Cape Canaveral, Fla. George Diller Launch Operations 321-867-2468 NASA Kennedy Space [email protected] Center, Fla. Media Services Information NASA Television News Conferences All NASA Television Channels (Public, Education, Media, A mission and science overview news conference on occasional HD feed and the Live Interactive Media Aquarius/SAC-D will be held at NASA Headquarters on Outlet) are available on Satellite AMC 3. Cable and satel- May 17, 2011, at 1 p.m. EDT. The news conference will lite
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Design Considerations for Mars Cargo of the Human Spaceflight Architecture Team’S Evolvable Mars Campaign
    Mission Design Considerations for Mars Cargo of the Human spaceflight Architecture Team's Evolvable Mars Campaign Waldy K. Sjauw, ∗ Melissa L. McGuirey and Joshua E. Freehz NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135, U.S.A. Recent NASA interest in human missions to Mars has led to an Evolvable Mars Cam- paign by the agency's Human Architecture Team. Delivering the crew return propulsion stages and Mars surface landers, SEP based systems are employed because of their high specific impulse characteristics enabling missions requiring less propellant although with longer transfer times. The Earth departure trajectories start from an SLS launch vehi- cle delivery orbit and are spiral shaped because of the low SEP thrust. Previous studies have led to interest in assessing the divide in trip time between the Earth departure and interplanetary legs of the mission for a representative SEP cargo vehicle. Nomenclature ARV Asteroid Redirect Vehicle BOL Beginning Of Life (electric power level) COMP ASS Collaborative Modeling for Parametric Assessment of Space Systems (GRC study team) EEO Elliptical Earth Orbit ELV Expendable Launch vehicle E − M Earth-to-Mars EMC Evolvable Mars Campaign GRC Glenn Research Center HAT Human Architecture Team LGA Lunar Gravity Assist MSF C Marshall Space Flight Center NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration SEP Solar Electric Propulsion SLS Space Launch System ST MD Space Technology Mission Directorate I. Introduction he NASA Human spaceflight Architecture Team (HAT) has kicked off an Evolvable Mars Campaign T(EMC). This campaign involves two main mission components: human transport and pre-deployed as- set, or cargo, delivery. While the human transport missions have a strong focus on duration, the cargo delivery missions allow for longer trip times in order to reduce required propellant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voyage of the Argo and Other Modes of Travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica
    THE VOYAGE OF THE ARGO AND OTHER MODES OF TRAVEL IN APOLLONIUS’ ARGONAUTICA Brian D. McPhee A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: William H. Race James J. O’Hara Emily Baragwanath © 2016 Brian D. McPhee ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Brian D. McPhee: The Voyage of the Argo and Other Modes of Travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica (Under the direction of William H. Race) This thesis analyzes the Argo as a vehicle for travel in Apollonius’ Argonautica: its relative strengths and weaknesses and ultimately its function as the poem’s central mythic paradigm. To establish the context for this assessment, the first section surveys other forms of travel in the poem, arranged in a hierarchy of travel proficiency ranging from divine to heroic to ordinary human mobility. The second section then examines the capabilities of the Argo and its crew in depth, concluding that the ship is situated on the edge between heroic and human travel. The third section confirms this finding by considering passages that implicitly compare the Argo with other modes of travel through juxtaposition. The conclusion follows cues from the narrator in proposing to read the Argo as a mythic paradigm for specifically human travel that functions as a metaphor for a universal and timeless human condition. iii parentibus meis “Finis origine pendet.” iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to my director and mentor, William Race.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Astronomy: an Introductory Resource Guide
    Women in Astronomy: An Introductory Resource Guide by Andrew Fraknoi (Fromm Institute, University of San Francisco) [April 2019] © copyright 2019 by Andrew Fraknoi. All rights reserved. For permission to use, or to suggest additional materials, please contact the author at e-mail: fraknoi {at} fhda {dot} edu This guide to non-technical English-language materials is not meant to be a comprehensive or scholarly introduction to the complex topic of the role of women in astronomy. It is simply a resource for educators and students who wish to begin exploring the challenges and triumphs of women of the past and present. It’s also an opportunity to get to know the lives and work of some of the key women who have overcome prejudice and exclusion to make significant contributions to our field. We only include a representative selection of living women astronomers about whom non-technical material at the level of beginning astronomy students is easily available. Lack of inclusion in this introductory list is not meant to suggest any less importance. We also don’t include Wikipedia articles, although those are sometimes a good place for students to begin. Suggestions for additional non-technical listings are most welcome. Vera Rubin Annie Cannon & Henrietta Leavitt Maria Mitchell Cecilia Payne ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents: 1. Written Resources on the History of Women in Astronomy 2. Written Resources on Issues Women Face 3. Web Resources on the History of Women in Astronomy 4. Web Resources on Issues Women Face 5. Material on Some Specific Women Astronomers of the Past: Annie Cannon Margaret Huggins Nancy Roman Agnes Clerke Henrietta Leavitt Vera Rubin Williamina Fleming Antonia Maury Charlotte Moore Sitterly Caroline Herschel Maria Mitchell Mary Somerville Dorrit Hoffleit Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin Beatrice Tinsley Helen Sawyer Hogg Dorothea Klumpke Roberts 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of the Keck Observatory to NASA and Its Scientific Community
    The Value of the Keck Observatory to NASA and Its Scientific Community Rachel Akeson1 and Tom Greene2, NASA representatives to the Keck Science Steering Committee Endorsed by: Geoffrey Bryden Geoff Marcy Bruce Carney Aki Roberge Heidi Hammel Travis Barman Mark Marley Antonin Bouchez Rosemary Killen Jason Wright Nick Siegler Chris Gelino Bruce Macintosh Rafael Millan-Gabet Ian McLean John Johnson Laurence Trafton Jim Lyke Joan Najita Dawn Gelino Peter Plavchan Josh Eisner Joshua Winn Chad Bender Kevin Covey Mark Swain William Herbst Franck Marchis Kathy Rages Andrew Howard Al Conrad Steve Vogt William Grundy Richard Barry 1 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadean, CA [email protected], phone: 626-398-9227 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA The Value of the Keck Observatory to NASA and Its Scientific Community 1 Executive Summary Over the last 13 years, NASA and its astrophysics and planetary science communities have greatly benefited from access to the Keck Observatory, the world’s largest optical/infrared telescopes. Studies using NASA Keck time have ranged from observations of the closest solar system bodies to discoveries of many of the known extrasolar planets. Observations at Keck have supported spaceflight missions to Mercury and the technology development of the James Webb Space Telescope. Access to Keck for the NASA community is an extremely cost effective method for NASA to meet its strategic goals and we encourage NASA to continue its long-term partnership with the Keck Observatory. 2 The Keck Observatory The two 10-meter telescopes of the Keck Observatory are the world’s largest optical and infrared telescopes and are located on Mauna Kea, one of the world’s premier sites for astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2020 March the Monthly Newsletter of the Bays Mountain Astronomy Club
    March 2020 March The Monthly Newsletter of the Bays Mountain Astronomy Club More on Edited by Adam Thanz this image. See FN1 Chapter 1 Cosmic Reflections William Troxel - BMAC Chair More on this image. See FN2 William Troxel More on Cosmic Reflections this image. See FN3 Greetings BMACers. March is here. The other day I was reading Planetarium, this was why I asked Adam and Jason if we could an article while getting my tires changed. It was about the do a program. If you did not get to come attend, and if the concept of time in our society. The article expressed that we, as members want, I will try to get another meeting in the future to Earth people, feel like we have less time. Because we are highlight the theater again. amateur astronomers, we understand time in a bit broader field. I March is a real busy month. You know that we will be holding our am not sure where I heard the following, however "We all have SunWatch solar viewing on clear Saturdays and Sundays thru the same amount of time, it is more about how we chose to the last week of October. The official time is 3 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. spend the time we have." I want to encourage each of you to at the Dam. If the weather is poor, the SunWatch is cancelled. always face each day learning as much as you can. March also starts the Spring session of the StarWatch night The February meeting had a wonderful turnout and we enjoyed viewing programs on the Saturday evenings of March and April one of the wonderful shows in the Park's Planetarium.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.2 News 768-769 MH
    Vol 439|16 February 2006 NEWS After budget cuts, this US space scientists rage picture of a mission to find earth-like planets is unlikely over axed projects to become a reality. Proposed cuts to NASA’s science budget have Scientists appreciate that NASA’s adminis- unleashed a storm of anger from US astro- trator, Mike Griffin, is struggling to balance nomers and planetary researchers, who say the his books. Griffin explained during the budget reductions would cause irreparable harm and press conference that the science cuts were drive young people from the field. necessary to pay for shuttle flights required to Under a NASA budget unveiled on 6 Febru- complete the International Space Station. “It’s ary (see Nature439,644; 2006), growth in what we needed to do,” he said regretfully. science spending between 2007 and 2010 But Jonathan Lunine, a planetary scientist at would be slashed by 17%. The budget proposed the University of Arizona, Tucson, sums up by President George W. Bush has yet to be the view of many when he says he finds it approved by Congress, but many planned pro- “puzzling and frustrating” that NASA would jects — from planet searches to a Mars sample divert money from science, widely considered return, as well as scores of individual research its most productive enterprise, to keep the grants — are likely to be scrapped (see ‘Some aged space shuttles flying. “It seems that NASA cuts proposed at NASA’). is trying to capitalize on its failures rather than Planetary scientist Alan Boss of the Carn- its successes,” says Lunine.
    [Show full text]
  • Iac-13-E3.4.7 International Perspectives on On-Orbit
    IAC-13-E3.4.7 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON ON-ORBIT SATELLITE SERVICING AND ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A SUSTAINABLE PATH FORWARD Brian C. Weeden Technical Advisor, Secure World Foundation, Washington DC, United States [email protected] Tiffany Chow Project Manager, Secure World Foundation, Washington DC, United States [email protected] Agnieszka Lukaszczyk Brussels Office Director, Secure World Foundation, Brussels, Belgium [email protected] Victoria A. Samson Washington Office Director, Secure World Foundation, Washington DC, United States [email protected] ABSTRACT On-orbit satellite servicing (OOS) and active debris removal (ADR) are part of an emerging category of future on- orbit activities that are critical for taking the next leap in our use of Earth orbit. The ability to repair or refuel satellites, construct new satellites in orbit, and even remove orbital debris can help drive innovative uses of space and create new possibilities. These activities also raise a host of security, legal, safety, operational, and policy challenges that need to be tackled for this future to be possible. In 2012 and 2013, Secure World Foundation (SWF) worked with partners to hold a series of conferences, workshops, and panel discussions to explore these various multidisciplinary challenges. The events took place in the United States, Belgium, and Singapore and included representation from a variety of international stakeholders. This paper summarizes those events, provides an overview of key discussion points, and presents significant findings and recommendations. It concludes with steps that industry, governments, and other stakeholders can take to help ensure that future ADR and OOS activities can take place in a safe and secure manner and contribute positively to the long- term sustainable use of space.
    [Show full text]