What's Next for Fish Farmers?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What's Next for Fish Farmers? R e s e a rch, Education, Outre a c h Volume 19, Number 6 SPOTLIGHT ON AQUACULTURE What’s Next for Fish Farmers? Gauging the Future of a Fledgling Industry BY MERRILL LEFFLER specially formulated feeds. Filtration is key to maintaining water quality, since contaminants can not only pro- duce off-flavors, lowering the value of his product, but can also sicken or even kill the fish — and put a serious dent in Sheriff’s investment. If all goes well, depending on the species, fish will be ready for market in six to seven months (for yellow perch and bluegills) or nine months (for tilapia) or a year (for hybrid striped bass). Although the clean tanks at Del- marva Fisheries seem on track for pr oducing a wholesome and valuable seafood product, the record for aqua- cu l t u r e that relies on rec i r culating sys- tems has posted as many failures as successes. The reason: raising fish for pr ofit depends on conquering a suite of challenges, and often raising fish is not the toughest part. “G r owing fish is the least of my pr oblems,” says Sheriff. In addition to In each tank here at Delmarva ot far from Cambridge on watching the tanks, feeding the fish Fisheries 12,000 gallons of water pass Maryland’s Eastern Shore and and cleaning the water, Sheriff, like th r ough clarifiers that remove solids Nmiles from the Choptank River, other aquaculturists, has to worry and then through biological filters fish circle the confines of 40-foot rec - about where the next crop of finger- that break down chemical wastes and tangular tanks. Though separated lings will come from, and, with low- leave them harmless. Unlike the tur- fr om the docks and deadrisers associ- price imports from South America bid waters of the Chesapeake, the ated with fishing on the Chesapeake, and Asia, about who will buy his fish water in these tanks, under the build- for Rick Sheriff these fish rep re s e n t once they’re ready for market. ing’s low roof and low lighting, looks his catch, his form of food prod u c - “I concentrate on fingerling sup- nearly transparent. tion. Clean water continually circu - plies and marketing,” Sherrif says. By all appearances, this is the way lates through each of Sheriff’s thirteen According to Sea Grant Extension closed-system farming is supposed to tanks, which sit in an out-of-the-way specialist Don Web s t e r , that’s the right work. Sheriff gets fingerlings from industrial park in Hurlock, Maryland. thing to do. “More aquaculture fails hatcheries that raise juveniles in high Water quality, if all works right, is because of business management numbers, then nourishes them with completely under his control . than system management,” says Web - A Maryland Sea Grant Publication Re c i r culating systems can be located anywhere and don’t depend on expensive waterfro n t pr operty or un p r edictable water supplies pumped from a river or bay. wise, the Department of Natural Re s o u r ces operates a hatchery where it has spawned some six million shad larvae for release into the Patuxent This 12,000-gallon recirculating tank, with an automated feeding system, teems with and Choptank rivers. tilapia at feeding time. Systems like this one, located in a converted barn on an Eastern DN R is using “Reproboost” tech- Shore fish farm, offer the control and economy needed to grow fish profitably. nologies, implants that release hor- mones over a period of time that st e r . Fingerlings, too, pose a major ing cages off the coasts of Maine and induce fish to spawn in captivity. pr oblem, according to Web s t e r , since Washington state. U.S. shellfish farm- Developed at the Center of Marine fish farmers must have a reliable sup- ers also cultivate oysters on the north- Biotechnology (COMB), part of the ply of the fingerlings they want when west and northeast coasts, and mus- University of Maryland Biotechnology they want to raise them. sels, crawfish and clams on the east Institute, these time-release implants “Rick’s system can grow fish prof - and Gulf coasts. Still, all told, the U.S. have made it possible to prod u c e itably,” says Robert Butz, a dairy and imports a great deal more seafood la r ge numbers of larvae that tradi- grain farmer in western Maryland than it exports, carrying an annual $5 tional spawning techniques could not who is now farming fish in tanks, billion seafood trade deficit. No won- de l i v e r . “but that’s not the complete story. der that the U.S. Department of Com- In addition to providing juveniles You need others to supply fingerlings me r ce’s Aquaculture Plan calls for the for stock enhancement, res e a rc h e r s — you need industry support when nation to invest more of its res e a rc h use hatchery-rea r ed strains to test for you get in trouble. This is still a fron - and expertise in raising domestic disease tolerance — in the effort, for tier mentality.” seafood products. example, to manage around the oys- In Maryland and the mid-Atlantic, ter diseases, MSX and Dermo . fa r med fish production for consump- Tough Times on the Frontier Beyond this, aquaculture is now play- tion hardly registers — aquaculture’ s The rearing of fish, shellfish and ing an important role in education as la r gest economic impact still comes aquatic plants — known generally as well — numbers of Maryland elemen- fr om ornamental fish. In Maryland, aq u a c u l t u r e — may be the aquatic tary and middle and high school the largest and most profitable aqua- equivalent of land-based agricultural teachers are using aquaculture to cultural production comes from Hunt- husbandry, but it lags far behind its teach students about biology and ing Creek in the western reaches of te r r estrial sibling. ecology by growing fish in tanks (see the state, which for eighty years has Though slow to catch on in this si d e b a r , “Aquaculture in the Class- pr oduced fish for the aquarium trade. country, the cultivation of fish is roo m ” ) . Another important role of aquaculture hardly new, going back at least 2000 Despite these important and in the Chesapeake region continues years in China, which may be why, worthwhile roles for aquaculture, the to be its use in proactive res t o r a t i o n with its long head start, China far out- bottomline for entrep r eneurs like Rick ef forts. Aquaculture has proven cen- paces other countries in overall aqua- Sh e r i f f and Robert Butz rem a i n s tral to efforts to res t o r e the Bay’s cu l t u r e production. That nation alone financial. What they bank on is a shad and oyster populations, for accounts for some 70 percent of mo r e controlled method of farmi n g example. At the University of Mary- fa r med fish each year, while the U.S. fish — not in ponds and not in net- land Center for Environmental Sci- trails far behind, a distant eighth at pens, where water quality and the ence (UMCES), the Horn Point Hatch- one percent of world prod u c t i o n . pr oblem of effluents can create envi- ery has produced more than ninety Most U.S. production comes from ronmental challenges — but in com- pe r cent of the disease-free spat used catfish grown in ponds in the Missis- pletely enclosed environments, rec i r - to reseed oyster bars in the Bay. Like- sippi delta and salmon raised in float- culating tanks, that offer the kind of 2 • MARYLAND MARINE NOTES At a recent meeting at the UMCES Ho r n Point Laboratory, Webster and Sea Grant Extension aquaculture spe- The Science of Closed Systems cialist Andy Lazur brought together university res e a r chers with Maryland ne of the country’s leading res e a rc h aquaculturists who hope to raise, in Oinstitutions in developing marine rec i r culating systems, species such as indoor rec i r culating systems is the Uni- tilapia, yellow perch, hybrid bluegills versity of Maryland’s Center of Marine and hybrid striped bass. There are Biotechnology (COMB) in Baltimore’ s other species to consider as well — Inner Harbor. Led by Yonathan Zohar, including marine species like the sea COMB is taking a multidisciplinary br eam. “What we wanted to learn, ” ap p r oach for moving fundamental says Lazur, “were the major prob l e m s res e a r ch from the lab to the farm. While that growers face, so we could set Zohar’s work involves analyzing the out a course of assistance to help this rep r oductive hormones and biochemical fledgling industry.” reactions that cause fish to become The model for this kind of cooper- gravid, COMB res e a r chers have been ation is well established. After all, focusing on a suite of other issues as de t e r mining res e a r ch needs by bring- well, from nutritional needs of diffe re n t ing scientists together with farme r s life stages to new microbial communi- has been at the heart of agricultural ties that can make marine circu l a t i o n development in the United States for systems more economically feasible.
Recommended publications
  • Crawford Reservoir
    Crawford Reservoir FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center General Information: Crawford Reservoir is a popular fishery that provides angling opportunity for yellow perch, channel catfish, northern pike, rainbow trout, black crappie, and largemouth bass. This reser- voir, located in Crawford State Park, covers 414 surface acres at full capacity and is open year round to an- gling. Visit the State Parks website for information on regulations, camping, and recreation: http://parks.state.co.us/Parks/Crawford Location: 2 miles south of the town of Crawford on Hwy 92. Primary Management: Warmwater Mixed Species Lake Category 602 Amenities Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes 2019 Black Crappie Boat Ramps (2) Rainbow Trout (10”): 9,100 Good spots include the East Campgrounds (2) Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,088 shore primarily around the Showers Clear Fork boat ramp cove or Largemouth Bass (6”): 150 anywhere with brush Visitors Center Largemouth Bass (20”): 70 Good baits include small tube Restrooms Channel Catfish (7”): 1,500 jigs and worms Parking Areas 2018 Channel Catfish Picnic Shelters Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Good spots include the north Largemouth Bass (2”): 30,000 side of peninsula cove and near the dam Channel Catfish (7”): 4,250 Good baits include night 2017 crawlers and cut-bait WARNING !!! Rainbow Trout (10”): 12,184 Largemouth Bass Prevent the Spread of Largemouth Bass (2”): 20,000 Good spots include the rocky Zebra Mussels and other Largemouth Bass (16”): 70 areas near the dam and flood- Aquatic Nuisance Species ed brush and vegetation in the Channel Catfish (9”): 2,000 spring and summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment-Turbine
    Draft Technical Memorandum Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment and Turbine-Induced Mortality Klamath Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2082) Prepared for PacifiCorp Prepared by CH2M HILL September 2003 Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 Objectives ......................................................................................................................................1 Study Approach ............................................................................................................................2 Fish Entrainment ..............................................................................................................2 Turbine-induced Mortality .............................................................................................2 Characterization of Fish Entrainment ......................................................................................2 Magnitude of Annual Entrainment ...............................................................................9 Size Composition............................................................................................................10 Species Composition ......................................................................................................10 Seasonal and Diurnal Distribution...............................................................................15 Turbine Mortality.......................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Best Indiana Panfishing Lakes
    15 best Indiana panfishing lakes This information has been shared numerous places but somehow we’ve missed putting it on our own website. If you’ve been looking for a place to catch some dinner, our fisheries biologists have compiled a list of the 15 best panfishing lakes throughout Indiana. Enjoy! Northern Indiana Sylvan Lake Sylvan Lake is a 669-acre man made reservoir near Rome City. It is best known for its bluegill fishing with some reaching 9 inches. About one third of the adult bluegill population are 7 inches or larger. The best places to catch bluegill are the Cain Basin at the east end of the lake and along the 8 to 10 foot drop-offs in the western basin. Red-worms, flies, and crickets are the most effective baits. Skinner Lake Skinner Lake is a 125-acre natural lake near Albion. The lake is known for crappie fishing for both black and white crappies. Most crappies are in the 8 to 9 inch range, with some reaching 16 inches long. Don’t expect to catch lots of big crappies, but you can expect to catch plenty that are keeper-size. The best crappie fishing is in May over developing lily pads in the four corners of the lake. Live minnows and small white jigs are the most effective baits. J. C. Murphey Lake J. C. Murphey Lake is located on Willow Slough Fish and Wildlife Area in Newton County. Following this winter, there was minimal ice fishing (due to lack of ice) and the spring fishing should be phenomenal especially for bluegills.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Erie Committee Sets Yellow Perch and Walleye Allowable Catches for 2021
    For Immediate Release Contacts: March 26, 2021 Canada: Rich Drouin: 519-488-9871 USA: Marc Gaden: 734-669-3012 Lake Erie Committee Sets Yellow Perch and Walleye Allowable Catches for 2021 Ann Arbor, MI—The binational Lake Erie Committee (LEC), composed of fishery managers from Michigan, New York, Ohio, Ontario and Pennsylvania—the five jurisdictions that manage the Lake Erie fishery—set a total allowable catch (TAC) for 2021 of 6.238 million pounds of yellow perch and 12.284 million walleye. Yellow perch are allocated in pounds and walleye are allocated by number of fish. These TACs represent a decrease for yellow perch from 7.805 million pounds of fish last year and an increase in walleye from 10.237 million fish. Specific allocations of both species are presented below by jurisdiction. TAC decisions are made by consensus of the LEC. These decisions are reflective of the status of Lake Erie’s fish populations and consider the goal of sustainable harvest each year. The allocations are determined by the LEC after extensive, lakewide biological assessments, analyses, discussions, and consultations with stakeholders. The individual state and provincial governments implement the TAC in their jurisdiction in accordance with their respective regulations and management objectives. WALLEYE: Guided by the Walleye Management Plan, the LEC set a 2021 lakewide walleye TAC of 12.284 million fish, a 20% increase over the 2020 TAC of 10.237 million fish. The increased TAC reflects strong recruitment during the previous few years and expected increases in population size. The Province of Ontario and the states of Ohio and Michigan share the TAC based on a formula of walleye habitat within each jurisdiction in the western and central basins of the lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Et Al 2019.Pdf
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management © 2019 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10287 ARTICLE Does a Bioenergetics Model Accurately Predict Fish Consumption by American White Pelicans? A Case Study on Walleyes in the Tamarac River, Minnesota Jake D. Graham*1 and Andrew W. Hafs Aquatic Biology Program, Department of Biology, Bemidji State University, 1500 Birchmont Drive Northeast, Bemidji, Minnesota 56601-2699, USA Anthony J. Kennedy Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Bemidji Area Fisheries Office, 2114 Bemidji Avenue, Bemidji, Minnesota 56601, USA Abstract The effect of piscivorous birds on fisheries is a growing concern for fisheries managers, especially when native birds consume large quantities of fish. The Red Lakes, Minnesota, fishery is one such example, where congregations of American white pelicans (AWPEs) Pelecanus erythrorhynchos forage on spawning Walleyes Sander vitreus. We quan- tified AWPE consumption of Walleyes on the Tamarac River, a major tributary of the Red Lakes, by using empirical diet data collected from lethally sampled birds and separately by using a bioenergetics model. Furthermore, we evalu- ated the diet and foraging patterns of AWPEs on the river. Camera trap data revealed that AWPEs were foraging nearly completely nocturnally, likely in response to Walleye spawning migrations, with Walleyes accounting for 98% of AWPE diets. The empirical estimate of daily fish consumption from lethally sampled birds was not significantly different from the bioenergetics estimate. Monte Carlo simulations were used to provide estimates of uncertainty in annual Walleye consumption. Based on the simulations, all estimates of annual Walleye consumption between 2014 and 2016 represented < 1% of adult (age ≥ 3) Walleyes in the system and < 2.5% of adult Walleye natural mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of Yellow Perch Perca Flavescens and Bluegill Lepomis Macrochirus in Clear And
    Feeding habits of yellow perch Perca flavescens and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus in clear and humic lakes BIOS 35502-01: Practicum in Field Biology Caitlin Broderick Advisor: Nicola Craig 2015 Broderick 2 Abstract Climate and land use change contribute to increasing dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in lakes in Europe and North America, necessitating research on lake physical properties, primary productivity and faunal communities. Darker water caused by DOC reduces depth of primary production, limit dissolved oxygen in deep water, and inhibit visual predation of planktivorous fish. This study investigates the effects of DOC concentration on the diets of juvenile bluegill and yellow perch, two species with developmental transitions from planktivory to benthic feeding, from clear and dark lakes. We hypothesized that fish stomach contents in a dark lake would show a higher benthic proportion of prey items. We also hypothesized that the proportion of benthic prey items would increase with size, and that the increase would be faster relative to size in darker lakes. Gastric lavage and analysis of stomach contents by dry weight were used to quantify benthic, pelagic and terrestrial prey items relative to fish size. Our study showed that the stomachs of fish from a dark lake were significantly fuller than those of fish from a light lake, and that the difference came primarily from increased pelagic feeding in dark-lake bluegill. In Crampton Lake, pelagic feeding was also shown to increase with body length in bluegill and decrease with body length. No significant relationship between body length and diet composition was found in either species in Hummingbird Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Predation and Environment on Quality of Yellow Perch and Bluegill Populations in Nebraska Sandhill Lakes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications Nebraska Game and Parks Commission 2002 Effects of Predation and Environment on Quality of Yellow Perch and Bluegill Populations in Nebraska Sandhill Lakes Craig P. Paukert South Dakota State University David W. Willis South Dakota State University Joel A. Klammer Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamestaff Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Paukert, Craig P.; Willis, David W.; and Klammer, Joel A., "Effects of Predation and Environment on Quality of Yellow Perch and Bluegill Populations in Nebraska Sandhill Lakes" (2002). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications. 49. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamestaff/49 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:86±95, 2002 q Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2002 Effects of Predation and Environment on Quality of Yellow Perch and Bluegill Populations in Nebraska Sandhill Lakes CRAIG P. P AUKERT* AND DAVID W. W ILLIS Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Post Of®ce Box 2140B, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007, USA JOEL A. KLAMMER Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Post Of®ce Box 508, Bassett, Nebraska 68714, USA Abstract.ÐWe investigated factors that may in¯uence the quality (e.g., high abundance, size structure, condition, and growth) of yellow perch Perca ¯avescens and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus populations in Nebraska sandhill lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Pike Fishing Waters
    North Dakota Public Fishing Waters Data as of: September 24, 2021 The following lists all public fishing waters alphabetically by lake name. Each listing includes travel directions , current status of the fishery for the upcoming season, and fishing piers (listed if present). Lakes without a boat ramp are listed as ‘no ramp’. Large systems have multiple access sites listed separately, with camping and other facilities noted along with the entity responsible for managing the facility. Click on the Lake Name to view a contour map or aerial photo showing the access point for the lake. The Current Lake Elevation is listed if known. All elevation data is in Datum NAVD88. Stocking will list fish stocking for the last 10 years. Survey Report provides a summary of the most recent data (within the last 10 years) collected by fisheries biologists during their standard sampling. Length Table provides a table of the sizes of fish measured by fisheries biologists during their most recent standard sampling. Length Chart provides a graph of the sizes of Statewide Pike Waters by Lake Name Alfred Lake (LaMoure) Stocking Survey Report Length Table Length Chart 7 miles east, 1.5 miles south of Gackle. Low density pike and perch populations. (No ramp). Alkali Lake (Sargent) Stocking Survey Report Length Table Length Chart 3 miles south of Cayuga. Low density walleye population. Some large fish present. (Fishing pier). Alkali Lake (Stutsman) 1,437.9 msl Not Stocked Survey Report Length Table Length Chart 11 miles north, 5 miles east, .5 miles south of Jamestown. Good numbers of pike, perch and walleye.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow Perch (Perca Flavescens) Culture Guide
    North Central Regional Aquaculture Center Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) Culture Guide Steven D. Hart, Donald L. Garling, and Jeffrey A. Malison, Editors In Cooperation with USDA A publication of the North Central Regional Aquaculture Center NCRAC Culture Series #103 October 2006 Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) Culture Guide A project of the North Central Regional Aquaculture Center (NCRAC) Series Editor: Joseph E. Morris, Associate Director, North Central Regional Aquaculture Center Originally published October 2006, by Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Yellow Perch Culture Guide ii NCRAC Culture Series 103 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................................................vi Preface....................................................................................................................................................................................vii Chapter 1: Introduction............................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Basic Biology and Life History..............................................................................................................................3 Family ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Perca Flavescens) Diets: Responses of Nutritional Programming on Grow
    Fish meal replacement with soybean meal in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) diets: responses of nutritional programming on growth, transcriptome and isoflavone accumulation DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Megan Marie Kemski Graduate Program in Food Science and Technology The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee Dr. Macdonald Wick, Advisor Dr. Konrad Dabrowski, Co-Advisor Dr. Chad Rappleye Dr. Yael Vodovotz 1 Copyrighted by Megan Marie Kemski 2018 2 Abstract One of the most economical and sustainable ways to reduce the consumption of wild fish resources, is to replace fish meal protein in aquafeeds with plant-based proteins. Aquaculturists, however, have found that they are not able to entirely replace fish meal with plant-based proteins in diets due to amino acid profile differences and possible anti- nutritional factors present, which have caused fish to have hindered growth, survival and reproductive quality. Thus, more research needs to be done for plant-based proteins to be fully integrated into fish diets that ultimately allow for optimal fish growth and health. The current study addresses a significant gap in the literature by focusing on fish meal replacement in yellow perch (Perca flavescens). The central hypothesis of this project is that there is a phenotype-diet interaction that occurs through nutritionally programming fish to a soybean meal-based diet. Nutritional programming is described as early dietary events that occur during critical developmental windows that can result in permanent changes later in life such as, growth potential health and metabolic status.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Phototaxis in the Initial Swim Bladder Inflation of Larval Yellow Perch (Perca Flavescens)
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2017 The Role of Phototaxis in the Initial Swim Bladder Inflation of Larval Yellow Perch (Perca Flavescens). Christopher Ryan Suchocki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Developmental Biology Commons Recommended Citation Suchocki, Christopher Ryan, "The Role of Phototaxis in the Initial Swim Bladder Inflation of Larval Yellow Perch (Perca Flavescens)." (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 1706. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1706 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ROLE OF PHOTOTAXIS IN THE INITIAL SWIM BLADDER INFLATION OF LARVAL YELLOW PERCH (PERCA FLAVESCENS) by Christopher Ryan Suchocki A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Freshwater Sciences and Technology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2017 ABSTRACT THE IMPLICATIONS OF LOW-LEVEL, NIGHTTIME ILLUMINATION ON THE INITIAL SWIM BLADDER INFLATION OF YELLOW PERCH (PERCA FLAVESCENS) LARVAE by Christopher Ryan Suchocki The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2017 Under the Supervision of Professor Osvaldo Jhonatan Sepulveda Villet The North Central Regional Aquaculture Center has designated the yellow perch (Perca flavescens) as a high priority species for culture. The demand for this species is high and it is estimated that the market could readily consume 50 to 100 million pounds per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Lake Erie Walleye and Yellow Perch Populations and Fisheries Todd Wills and Mike Thomas Lake St
    Dynamics of Lake Erie Walleye and Yellow Perch Populations and Fisheries Todd Wills and Mike Thomas Lake St. Clair Fisheries Research Station Background Walleye and Yellow Perch are the most valuable fishery resources in the lower Great Lakes, where they are targeted extensively by recreational anglers in the United States as well as recreational anglers and commercial fishers in the Canadian Province of Ontario (Photo 1). The spawning success of Walleye and Yellow Perch is extremely variable and greatly influences their abundance, growth, and mortality, which in turn can contribute to the success of those who fish for these species. The Fisheries Division conducts annual surveys of Lake Erie Walleye and Yellow Perch populations (also known as stocks) and fisheries through a multi-agency agreement coordinated by the international Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) (Photo 2). The information generated from this survey is shared with our partner fisheries agencies in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Ontario. The data are used to improve understanding of fish population dynamics, estimate Walleye and Yellow Perch fish abundance, and directly drive the determination of harvest quotas and fishing regulations for these recreationally and commercially important fisheries. Photo 1. Angler caught walleye from Lake Erie. Photo 2. Yellow Perch collected during Fisheries Division’s annual Lake Erie surveys. What are some of the current results? Results from the annual fall Walleye gill-net survey show that the 2014 Walleye net catch (also known as Catch-Per-Effort or CPE) of 71 fish/net lift was 63% higher than 2013 and is the 4th highest on record for 2005–2014.
    [Show full text]