Nonsupersymmetric dualities from mirror symmetry

Shamit Kachru,1 Michael Mulligan,2, 1 Gonzalo Torroba,3 and Huajia Wang4 1Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA 92511, USA 3Centro At´omico Bariloche and CONICET, R8402AGP Bariloche, ARG 4Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA We study supersymmetry breaking perturbations of the simplest dual pair of 2+1-dimensional N =2 supersymmetric field theories – the free chiral multiplet and N = 2 super-QED with a single flavor. We find dual descriptions of a phase diagram containing four distinct massive phases. The equivalence of the intervening critical theories gives rise to several non-supersymmetric avatars of mirror symmetry: we find dualities relating scalar QED to a free fermion and Wilson-Fisher theories to both scalar and fermionic QED. Thus, mirror symmetry can be viewed as the multicritical parent duality from which these non-supersymmetric dualities directly descend.

I. INTRODUCTION ized in the A and B pictures. This unifies the simplest duality of 3d supersymmetric field theory with various Duality plays a central role in the modern understand- dualities relating fermionic and scalar QED to theories ing of quantum field theory. In some cases, as with S- of free fermions or Wilson-Fisher bosons. It provides duality of maximally supersymmetric four-dimensional a logical completion of [11], where the duality between (4d) Yang-Mills theory, it refers to an exact symmetry phases I and II (and the intervening critical point) was exchanging strong and weak coupling limits of the same already derived. theory. In others, as with the dualities of N = 1 super- The dualities studied here are of interest both for their symmetric field theories in four dimensions [1] or mirror intrinsic importance in understanding the structure of symmetry of 3d supersymmetric gauge theories [2–4], it 3d quantum field theory, and for potential applications relates the low-energy physics arising from two distinct to problems in condensed matter physics including the high energy theories. Dualities have found diverse appli- study of topological order and metallic criticality. cations in high energy physics, condensed matter physics, and mathematics. II. CHIRAL MIRROR SYMMETRY An important way to deepen our understanding of du- ality is to relate one duality to another. This simplifies the logical structure of the assumptions we must make, We first review the essential properties of the chiral yielding a web of dualities from a single starting point, mirror symmetry duality [11, 28]. and can also allow us to derive new dualities. Theory A consists of a free chiral superfield (v, Ψ) which contains a complex scalar v and its (two- Motivated in part by the proposal [5] for a duality gov- component) Dirac fermion superpartner Ψ. The theory erning the physics of the half-filled Landau level, there enjoys two global abelian symmetries, U(1) and U(1) , have been several recent discussions for dualities relating J R whose actions on (v, Ψ) are given below. some of the simplest non-supersymmetric 3d field theo- ries [6–11] (with closely related earlier work appearing in U(1)J U(1)R [12–21]). In this note, we show that many of these dual- v 1 1 (1) ities can be derived as a consequence of the most basic avatar of mirror symmetry of 3d N = 2 supersymmet- Ψ 1 0 ric gauge theories.1 We build on our work [11] to show arXiv:1609.02149v2 [hep-th] 9 Jan 2017 Introducing background gauge fields Aˆ associated to that, after breaking supersymmetry, the duality between J,R the global U(1) symmetries, the theory A Lagrangian, the theory of a free chiral multiplet – theory A – and su- J,R persymmetric quantum electrodynamics (SQED) with a L(A) = |D v|2 − m2|v|2 AˆJ +AˆR v single flavor – theory B – yields a rich phase diagram with 1 four distinct phases. Duality relates both the phases and + Ψ¯ iD/ Ψ − m ΨΨ¯ − Aˆ dAˆ . (2) AˆJ Ψ J J the intervening critical points of the dual pairs. Along 8π the four walls separating distinct phases (see Figs. 1 and For abelian gauge fields A and B, the covariant deriva- 2), we find critical theories with dual descriptions real- tives D±A ≡ ∂µ ∓ iAµ with µ ∈ {0, 1, 2}; D/ B ≡ µ † 0 2 γ (∂µ − Bµ) and Ψ¯ ≡ Ψ γ with γ-matrices satisfying

1 On a related direction, it is also possible to deform three-dimensional Seiberg duality [22–25] to derive non- 2 We choose the metric ηµν = diag(1, −1, −1) and γ-matrices that 0 1 2 0 3 1 1 2 2 supersymmetric dualities in large N limits, as was done in satisfy (γ γ γ )αβ = −iδαβ , e.g., γ = σ , γ = iσ , γ = iσ [26, 27]. where σj are the Pauli-σ matrices. 2

{γµ, γν } = 2ηµν . Chern-Simons (CS) terms are written Chiral mirror symmetry says that the IR (g → ∞) µνρ 012 3 as AdB ≡  Aµ∂ν Bρ with  = 1. Besides the rele- limit of theory B has the free field description given by vant bosonic and fermionic mass terms, theory A admits theory A. a relevant perturbation proportional to |v|4 (which will In order to understand the RG flows below, let us now play a key role below), and a classically marginal inter- discuss the map of relevant deformations.σ ˆJ and Dˆ J action |v|2ΨΨ.¯ give rise to masses in theory A via (3). These parame- The AˆJ gauge field can be included in a background ters are external backgrounds for the U(1)J supercurrent, ˆ vector multiplet VˆJ = (AˆJ , σˆJ , λJ , Dˆ J ) with the cou- and are mapped exactly to theory B according to the last plings occurring in (2) dictated by unbroken N = 2 su- line in (6). If we further restrict to high energies, theory persymmetry: B is weakly coupled and σ and D may be integrated out to show thatσ ˆJ and Dˆ J produce masses for u and ψ. 2 2 ˆ The other renormalizable deformations of theory A, |v|4 mv =σ ˆJ + DJ , mΨ =σ ˆJ . (3) and |v|2ΨΨ,¯ do not correspond to conserved currents, Chiral mirror symmetry allows us to map all components and hence their effect in theory B is more involved. Nev- in this multiplet across the duality. The scalarσ ˆJ and ertheless, we may derive an approximate correspondence ∗ D-term Dˆ J , in particular, play important roles in our by noting that v Ψ ∼ λ from the quantum numbers in 2 ˆ derivation. both theories, and |v| ∼ σ from the couplings of DJ on Theory B is N = 2 SQED with a single chiral flavor both sides. These also agree with the Taub-NUT map of 4 (u, ψ) and U(1)a gauge group. The corresponding charge the underlying N = 4 theory [31, 32]. Therefore, |v| and assignments are given below. |v|2ΨΨ¯ map to masses for σ and the gaugino in theory B. We stress that this map is approximate and is expected U(1)J U(1)R U(1)a to receive large quantum corrections in the IR. u 0 0 -1 ψ 0 -1 -1 III. DYNAMICS AND PHASES OF THEORY A 2 (4) e2πiγ/g 1 0 0 σ 0 0 0 Theory A has four distinct phases parameterized by 2 λ 0 -1 0 the signs of the effective masses mv and mΨ – see Fig. 1. These gapped phases can be invariantly characterized σ is the real scalar partner of the dynamical 3d gauge field 4 µ aµ, λ is the gaugino , and γ is the dual photon (∂ γ = 1 µνρ 2π  ∂ν aρ). Including the background U(1)J,R terms considered previously, the dual theory B Lagrangian:

(B) L = LV + Lmatter + LCS − LBF (5) with   1 1 2 1 2 ¯ 1 2 LV = − f + (∂σ) + λiD/ ˆ λ + D , g2 4 µν 2 −AR 2 L = |D u|2 + ψi¯ D/ ψ − (σ2 − D)|u|2 matter −a −a−AˆR + σψψ¯ + u∗λψ¯ + uψλ¯ , 1 L = (ada + 2Dσ + λλ¯ ), (6) CS 8π 1   1 LBF = adAˆJ + Dˆ J σ +σ ˆJ D + adAˆR . 2π 4π FIG. 1: Phase diagram of theory A. Massless fields occur along the red lines (second order phase transitions). fµν = ∂µaν −∂ν aµ is the field strength of the U(1)a gauge field. 5 by their responses to the background AˆJ,R fields. Inte- grating out the massive degrees of freedom according to

3 We denote the effect of integrating out a single Dirac fermion of sgn(m) unit charge and mass m by the level-1/2 CS term 8π AdA in the Wilsonian effective Lagrangian. A gauge-invariant expression 5 This statement is slightly imprecise as the response can be mod- utilizes the eta-invariant – see [8, 29, 30] for further information. ified by regularization-dependent contact terms [33]; the differ- 4 λ is the charge-conjugate of the fermion that appears in the ence of the response across a phase transition is, however, phys- conventionally-defined N = 2 vector multiplet. ical and this is how our expressions should be understood. 3 the prescription in Fig. 1, this response is captured by the effective Lagrangians: 1 LI = − Aˆ dAˆ , 4π J J LII = 0, 1 LIII = − bd(Aˆ + Aˆ ), 2π J R 1 1 LIV = − Aˆ dAˆ − bd(Aˆ + Aˆ ). (7) 4π J J 2π J R For simplicity, we have truncated the effective La- grangians at the leading quadratic order in the deriva- tive expansion. In LIII and LIV, we introduced the 3d gauge field b [34] whose equation of motion imposes the symmetry-breaking constraint, FIG. 2: Phase diagram of theory B. AˆJ + AˆR = 0, (8)

2 that occurs when mv < 0. Phases I and II, along with the intervening critical f± that diagonalize the effective fermion mass matrix in point, were studied in [11]. To reliably study phases 2 L(B) = −m ψψ¯ − m λλ¯ + δm∗ λψ¯ + δm ψλ.¯ (10) III and IV, where the effective mass-squared mv < 0, mass ψ λ we introduce a stabilizing interaction |v|4. Even though this interaction breaks supersymmetry, it does not qual- The third and fourth terms – see the second line of itatively affect the analysis or conclusions for the phase Lmatter – are parameterized by the fermion mass mix- 2 structure when m2 > 0. It does modify the precise loca- ing δm which is only non-zero in phases when h|u |i= 6 0, v 2 2 2 ˆ i.e., mu < 0. The mass matrix in (10) has the two eigen- tion at which mv = 0: the classical locationσ ˆJ + DJ = 0 – see (3) – is modified quantum mechanically. values, 4 To add the |v| interaction in a way that can be tracked 1 q  ˆ m = m + m ± (m − m )2 + 4|δm|2 . (11) across the duality, we promote DJ → DJ to a dy- f± 2 ψ λ ψ λ namical field and integrate it out with Gaussian weight 1 ˆ ˆ 2 f are composed of linear combinations of ψ and λ with LDJ = 2h2 (DJ − D0) . (This technique was used in [27] ± in a different context.) The resulting classical scalar po- relative weights that vary as the background parameters tential, are tuned: Fig. 2 implies that upon transitioning from phase II to phase I, f+ becomes ψ and f− becomes λ and h2 V = (ˆσ2 + Dˆ )|v|2 + |v|4, (9) vice versa in the transition from phase II to phase III. eff J 0 2 The matching of the theory B responses to those of theory A in (7) follows upon integrating out the massive 2 ˆ 2 2 features a stable vacuum at |v| = (|D0| − σˆJ )/h when degrees of freedom, ˆ 2 D0 < −σˆJ . The phase diagram in Fig. 1 contains four lines of phase transitions: these transitions are described (B) 1 1 L = sgn(m )(a + Aˆ )d(a + Aˆ ) + ada either by critical Wilson-Fisher theories with interaction eff 8π f+ R R 8π strength determined by h2 or by the mass sign-changing 1 1 1 + sgn(m )Aˆ dAˆ − adAˆ − Aˆ da. transition of a free Dirac fermion. 8π f− R R 4π R 2π J (12)

IV. DYNAMICS AND PHASES OF THEORY B This formula should be read with the replacement f+ = ψ 2 and f− = λ in phases where mu > 0. In phases I, III, 2 Direct analysis of theory B for all values of the and IV where mu > 0, the response in (12) is seen to background parameters is subtle because the theory is directly match that in (7) for the values of the effective strongly coupled. Duality and supersymmetry (when un- mass parameters given in Fig. 2. In phase I, the CS broken), however, may together be used to determine the ada coefficient is nonzero, and integrating out a matches theory B dynamics. the result from theory A. On the other hand, in phases We have found it possible to uniquely realize the the- III and IV, this coefficient vanishes and a is identified ory A response summarized in (7) using the effective mass with the gauge field b introduced in (7); this reproduces 2 parameters mu and mf± for the charged degrees of free- the correct symmetry breaking pattern and CS response. dom of theory B with the prescription given in Fig. 2. In phase II, the condensation h|u|2i 6= 0 essentially fixes We have introduced mass parameters for Dirac fermions a = 0 and we find agreement with LII in (7) after using 4 the effective mass values in Fig. 2. The response in phase Perturbation theory in Dˆ 0 < 0 is likewise consistent

II requires mf+ mf− < 0 or with the assignment of effective masses. To leading order in Dˆ 0, the vacua in (14) are shifted as follows: 2 mψmλ < |δm | . (13) 2 −2 δhui = 0, δhσi ∼ g |Dˆ 0|σˆ , forσ ˆJ < 0, Happily, this requirement is consistent with the values of J ˆ −3/2 ˆ −1 the effective masses in the adjacent phases I and III. δhui ∼ −|D0|σˆJ , δhσi ∼ |D0|σˆJ , forσ ˆJ > 0, To provide additional justification for this picture, we (15) analyze theory B near the line Dˆ 0 = 0 where supersym- metry is preserved. Because supersymmetry precludes where ∼ indicates equality up to multiplication by a pos- phase transitions as a function of the coupling g, we may itive constant. Forσ ˆJ < 0, we see that mψ is decreased transfer the qualitative information gleaned at weak cou- to leading order, consistent with the putative fermion ˆ 2 pling to the strong coupling regime of interest. Note that mass sign-changing transition at D0 = −sgn(ˆσJ )ˆσJ . For we are ignoring the effects of the dynamical DJ field here; σˆJ > 0, the perturbative decrease of hui is consistent ˆ 2 it provides a stabilizing potential for σ, but can otherwise with symmetry restoration across the D0 = −sgn(ˆσJ )ˆσJ be ignored near the origin of Fig. 2. line. Likewise, the perturbative decrease of mψ = −hσi We first verify the effective mass parameter assign- matches the expected behavior in phase III. Integrating ments in phases I and II along Dˆ 0 = 0. In [11], we demon- out (u, ψ) near the origin in phases III and IV generates a strated that the supersymmetry-preserving vacuum for 1-loop correction with the result, mλ ∼ |mψ|−|mu|. This the scalar fields lies at agrees with the sign assignments for mλ near the II/III and IV/I phase boundaries, where u and ψ are becoming 2 h|u| i = 0, hσi =σ ˆJ , forσ ˆJ < 0, massless. σˆ h|u|2i = J , hσi = 0, forσ ˆ > 0. (14) 2π J V. DUALITIES AND IMPLICATIONS From this analysis we abstract the following. Forσ ˆJ < 0, 2 we determine the effective masses mu > 0, mψ = −hσi > 0, and mλ < 0 from LCS in (6). Forσ ˆJ > 0, we find that Examination of Figs. 1 and 2 shows that a single field 2 mu < 0, mψ = 0, and mλ < 0. Using the mass matrix becomes light at a given phase transition. Mirror sym- eigenvalues in (11), we find agreement with the inferred metry implies the resulting critical theories are dual. We values in Fig. 2. thus arrive at the following dualities (indicated by ↔):

1 2 4 1 1 Ψ¯ iD/ ˆ Ψ − AˆJ dAˆJ ↔ |D−au| − |u| + ada − AˆJ da, (16) AJ 8π 4π 2π 2 4 1 2 2 4 1 |D ˆ ˆ v| − |v| ↔ − f + |D−au| − |u| − ad(AˆJ + AˆR), (17) AJ +AR 4g2 µν 2π 1 1 ¯ 1 1 Ψ¯ iD/ ˆ Ψ − AˆJ dAˆJ − bd(AˆJ + AˆR) ↔ λiD/ ˆ λ − AˆJ dAˆJ − ad(AˆJ + AˆR), (18) AJ 8π 2π −AR 8π 2π 2 4 1 ¯ 1 1 1 1 |D ˆ ˆ v| − |v| − AˆJ dAˆJ ↔ ψiD/ ˆ ψ + ada − ad(AˆJ + AˆR) − AˆRdAˆR. (19) AJ +AR 4π −a−AR 8π 2π 2 8π

(16) and (19) are two examples of the bosonization duali- tinction from (17) lies in the presence of a level-1 CS ties discussed in [6, 8]. The supersymmetric chiral mirror term for AˆJ in the adjacent massive phases. duality can be viewed as the multicritical parent duality from which these non-supersymmetric dualities descend. (16) provides dual descriptions for the integer quantum Hall plateau transition between phases I and II where the level of the AˆJ CS term changes by unity. (17) is Peskin- In [7, 8], it was shown how the action of the modu- Dasgupta-Halperin duality [35, 36] and may be used to lar group on dual conformal field theories (CFTs) can describe a superfluid transition where the diagonal com- generate additional dualities. Here, we discuss how this ponent of the U(1)J × U(1)R symmetry is broken. (18) action relates the above dualities to one another. Denot- is a “trivial” duality relating a free fermion of theory ing the Lagrangian of a general CFT by L(Φ, Aˆ), where A to a free fermion of theory B. (19) again describes a Φ collectively represents the fields of the CFT and Aˆ is a U(1)J × U(1)R symmetry-breaking transition; the dis- background field for the global U(1) symmetry, the mod- 5 ular group acts as follows [37, 38]: formation on (19), we obtain a fermionic description for the U(1)J × U(1)R symmetry-breaking transition com- 1 T : L(Φ, Aˆ) 7→ L(Φ, Aˆ) + Adˆ A,ˆ plementary to (17). (A closely related duality to (19) 4π was previously argued for in [39].) Using the marvelous 1 S : L(Φ, Aˆ) 7→ L(Φ, a) − Bda.ˆ (20) property of transitivity, we can relate the right-hand side 2π of (17) to the T -transform of the right-hand side of (19). The action S deserves further explanation: this trans- formation makes the background field dynamical Aˆ → a and adds to the Lagrangian a new background field via 1 ˆ Acknowledgments the BF coupling − 2π Bda. The rules in (20) induce the 1 1  0 1 action T :σ ˜ 7→ σ˜ and S :σ ˜ 7→ σ˜ on the 0 1 −1 0 This research was supported in part by grant complexified conductivityσ ˜ = σxy + iσxx ∈ H (extracted NSF PHY-1316699 (S.K.), the University of Califor- from the two-point functions of the U(1) current). nia (M.M.), Conicet PIP-11220110100752 (G.T.), and Using (20), we see that (19) is the S-transform of DARPA YFA contract D15AP00108 (H.W.). M.M. is (16). Examining the sides of the initial duality that a grateful for the generous hospitality of the Aspen Center given theory occurs, we may say that S exchanges the- for Physics NSF PHY-1066293 and the Kavli Institute ory A and B in a loose sense. Performing a T trans- for Theoretical Physics NSF PHY-11-25915.

[1] N. Seiberg, “Electric - magnetic duality in bosonic vector models coupled to Chern-Simons gauge supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,” Nucl. theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics 3 (Mar., Phys. B435 (1995) 129–146, arXiv:hep-th/9411149 2012) 37, arXiv:1110.4382 [hep-th]. [hep-th]. [14] O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari, and R. Yacoby, “Correlation [2] K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, “Mirror symmetry in functions of large N Chern-Simons-Matter theories and three-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B 387 bosonization in three dimensions,” Journal of High (1996) 513, arXiv:hep-th/9607207 [hep-th]. Energy Physics 12 (Dec., 2012) 28, arXiv:1207.4593 [3] O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, [hep-th]. and M. Strassler, “Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric [15] C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Dual dirac liquid on the gauge theories in three-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 499 surface of the electron topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. (1997) 67. X 5 (2015) 041031. [4] A. Kapustin and M. J. Strassler, “On mirror symmetry [16] M. A. Metlitski and A. Vishwanath, “Particle-vortex in three-dimensional Abelian gauge theories,” JHEP duality of two-dimensional Dirac fermion from 9904 (1999) 021, arXiv:hep-th/9902033 [hep-th]. electric-magnetic duality of three-dimensional [5] D. T. Son, “Is the composite fermion a dirac particle?,” topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 93 no. 24, (June, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 031027. 2016) 245151, arXiv:1505.05142 [cond-mat.str-el]. [6] O. Aharony, “Baryons, monopoles and dualities in [17] S. Kachru, M. Mulligan, G. Torroba, and H. Wang, Chern-Simons-matter theories,” Journal of High Energy “Mirror symmetry and the half-filled Landau level,” Physics 2 (Feb., 2016) 93, arXiv:1512.00161 [hep-th]. Phys. Rev. B92 (2015) 235105, arXiv:1506.01376 [7] A. Karch and D. Tong, “Particle-Vortex Duality from [cond-mat.str-el]. 3d Bosonization,” arXiv:1606.01893 [hep-th]. [18] S. D. Geraedts, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, M. A. [8] N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang, and E. Witten, “A Metlitski, A. Vishwanath, and O. I. Motrunich, “The duality web in 2 + 1 dimensions and condensed matter half-filled Landau level: The case for Dirac composite physics,” Annals of Physics 374 (Nov., 2016) 395–433, fermions,” Science 352 (2016) 197, arXiv:1508.04140 arXiv:1606.01989 [hep-th]. [cond-mat.str-el]. [9] J. Murugan and H. Nastase, “Particle-vortex duality in [19] C. Xu and Y.-Z. You, “Self-dual quantum topological insulators and superconductors,” ArXiv electrodynamics as boundary state of the e-prints (June, 2016) , arXiv:1606.01912 [hep-th]. three-dimensional bosonic topological insulator,” Phys. [10] P.-S. Hsin and N. Seiberg, “Level/rank Duality and Rev. B 92 (Dec, 2015) 220416. Chern-Simons-Matter Theories,” ArXiv e-prints (July, [20] D. F. Mross, J. Alicea, and O. I. Motrunich, “Explicit 2016) , arXiv:1607.07457 [hep-th]. derivation of duality between a free dirac cone and [11] S. Kachru, M. Mulligan, G. Torroba, and H. Wang, quantum electrodynamics in (2 + 1) dimensions,” Phys. “Bosonization and Mirror Symmetry,” Rev. Lett. 117 (Jun, 2016) 016802. arXiv:1608.05077 [hep-th]. [21] D. F. Mross, J. Alicea, and O. I. Motrunich, “Bosonic [12] S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S. P. Trivedi, S. R. Analogue of Dirac Composite Fermi Liquid,” ArXiv Wadia, and X. Yin, “Chern-Simons theory with vector e-prints (May, 2016) , arXiv:1605.03582 fermion matter,” European Physical Journal C 72 [cond-mat.str-el]. (Aug., 2012) 2112, arXiv:1110.4386 [hep-th]. [22] F. Benini, C. Closset, and S. Cremonesi, “Comments on [13] O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari, and R. Yacoby, “d = 3 3d Seiberg-like dualities,” Journal of High Energy 6

Physics 10 (Oct., 2011) 75, arXiv:1108.5373 beyond the Landau-Ginzburg paradigm and [hep-th]. supersymmetry,” Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 2. [23] T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, and S. Gukov, “Gauge Theories [32] A. Hook, S. Kachru, G. Torroba, and H. Wang, Labelled by Three-Manifolds,” ArXiv e-prints (Aug., “Emergent Fermi surfaces, fractionalization and duality 2011) , arXiv:1108.4389 [hep-th]. in supersymmetric QED,” JHEP 1408 (2014) 031, [24] C. Beem, T. Dimofte, and S. Pasquetti, “Holomorphic arXiv:1401.1500 [hep-th]. Blocks in Three Dimensions,” ArXiv e-prints (Nov., [33] C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, 2012) , arXiv:1211.1986 [hep-th]. Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on [25] K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, “Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons contact terms in three dimensions,” Chern-Simons-Matter Theories,” JHEP 1307 (2013) Journal of High Energy Physics 9 (Sept., 2012) 91, 079, arXiv:1305.1633 [hep-th]. arXiv:1206.5218 [hep-th]. [26] S. Jain, S. Minwalla, and S. Yokoyama, “Chern Simons [34] J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, duality with a fundamental boson and fermion,” “D-brane charges in five-brane backgrounds,” JHEP 10 Journal of High Energy Physics 11 (Nov., 2013) 37, (2001) 005, arXiv:hep-th/0108152 [hep-th]. arXiv:1305.7235 [hep-th]. [35] M. E. Peskin, “Mandelstam ’t Hooft Duality in Abelian [27] G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, “Three dimensional Lattice Models,” Annals Phys. 113 (1978) 122. bosonization from supersymmetry,” Journal of High [36] C. Dasgupta and B. I. Halperin, “Phase transition in a Energy Physics 11 (Nov., 2015) 13, arXiv:1507.04378 lattice model of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 [hep-th]. (Nov, 1981) 1556–1560. [28] D. Tong, “Dynamics of N=2 supersymmetric [37] E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) Action On Three-Dimensional Chern-Simons theories,” JHEP 0007 (2000) 019, Conformal Field Theories With Abelian Symmetry,” arXiv:hep-th/0005186 [hep-th]. ArXiv High Energy Physics - Theory e-prints (July, [29] L. Alvarez-Gaume, S. Della Pietra, and G. W. Moore, 2003) , hep-th/0307041. “Anomalies and Odd Dimensions,” Annals Phys. 163 [38] R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou, “SL(2,Z) action on (1985) 288. three-dimensional CFTs and holography,” JHEP 12 [30] E. Witten, “Fermion path integrals and topological (2003) 020, arXiv:hep-th/0309177 [hep-th]. phases,” Reviews of Modern Physics 88 no. 3, (July, [39] M. Mulligan, “Particle-vortex symmetric liquid,” ArXiv 2016) 035001, arXiv:1508.04715 e-prints (May, 2016) , arXiv:1605.08047 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. [cond-mat.str-el]. [31] S. Sachdev and X. Yin, “Quantum phase transitions