Nonsupersymmetric dualities from mirror symmetry Shamit Kachru,1 Michael Mulligan,2, 1 Gonzalo Torroba,3 and Huajia Wang4 1Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA 92511, USA 3Centro At´omico Bariloche and CONICET, R8402AGP Bariloche, ARG 4Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA We study supersymmetry breaking perturbations of the simplest dual pair of 2+1-dimensional N =2 supersymmetric field theories { the free chiral multiplet and N = 2 super-QED with a single flavor. We find dual descriptions of a phase diagram containing four distinct massive phases. The equivalence of the intervening critical theories gives rise to several non-supersymmetric avatars of mirror symmetry: we find dualities relating scalar QED to a free fermion and Wilson-Fisher theories to both scalar and fermionic QED. Thus, mirror symmetry can be viewed as the multicritical parent duality from which these non-supersymmetric dualities directly descend. I. INTRODUCTION ized in the A and B pictures. This unifies the simplest duality of 3d supersymmetric field theory with various Duality plays a central role in the modern understand- dualities relating fermionic and scalar QED to theories ing of quantum field theory. In some cases, as with S- of free fermions or Wilson-Fisher bosons. It provides duality of maximally supersymmetric four-dimensional a logical completion of [11], where the duality between (4d) Yang-Mills theory, it refers to an exact symmetry phases I and II (and the intervening critical point) was exchanging strong and weak coupling limits of the same already derived. theory. In others, as with the dualities of N = 1 super- The dualities studied here are of interest both for their symmetric field theories in four dimensions [1] or mirror intrinsic importance in understanding the structure of symmetry of 3d supersymmetric gauge theories [2{4], it 3d quantum field theory, and for potential applications relates the low-energy physics arising from two distinct to problems in condensed matter physics including the high energy theories. Dualities have found diverse appli- study of topological order and metallic criticality. cations in high energy physics, condensed matter physics, and mathematics. II. CHIRAL MIRROR SYMMETRY An important way to deepen our understanding of du- ality is to relate one duality to another. This simplifies the logical structure of the assumptions we must make, We first review the essential properties of the chiral yielding a web of dualities from a single starting point, mirror symmetry duality [11, 28]. and can also allow us to derive new dualities. Theory A consists of a free chiral superfield (v; Ψ) which contains a complex scalar v and its (two- Motivated in part by the proposal [5] for a duality gov- component) Dirac fermion superpartner Ψ. The theory erning the physics of the half-filled Landau level, there enjoys two global abelian symmetries, U(1) and U(1) , have been several recent discussions for dualities relating J R whose actions on (v; Ψ) are given below. some of the simplest non-supersymmetric 3d field theo- ries [6{11] (with closely related earlier work appearing in U(1)J U(1)R [12{21]). In this note, we show that many of these dual- v 1 1 (1) ities can be derived as a consequence of the most basic avatar of mirror symmetry of 3d N = 2 supersymmet- Ψ 1 0 ric gauge theories.1 We build on our work [11] to show arXiv:1609.02149v2 [hep-th] 9 Jan 2017 Introducing background gauge fields A^ associated to that, after breaking supersymmetry, the duality between J;R the global U(1) symmetries, the theory A Lagrangian, the theory of a free chiral multiplet { theory A { and su- J;R persymmetric quantum electrodynamics (SQED) with a L(A) = jD vj2 − m2jvj2 A^J +A^R v single flavor { theory B { yields a rich phase diagram with 1 four distinct phases. Duality relates both the phases and + Ψ¯ iD= Ψ − m ΨΨ¯ − A^ dA^ : (2) A^J Ψ J J the intervening critical points of the dual pairs. Along 8π the four walls separating distinct phases (see Figs. 1 and For abelian gauge fields A and B, the covariant deriva- 2), we find critical theories with dual descriptions real- tives D±A ≡ @µ ∓ iAµ with µ 2 f0; 1; 2g; D= B ≡ µ y 0 2 γ (@µ − Bµ) and Ψ¯ ≡ Ψ γ with γ-matrices satisfying 1 On a related direction, it is also possible to deform three-dimensional Seiberg duality [22{25] to derive non- 2 We choose the metric ηµν = diag(1; −1; −1) and γ-matrices that 0 1 2 0 3 1 1 2 2 supersymmetric dualities in large N limits, as was done in satisfy (γ γ γ )αβ = −iδαβ , e.g., γ = σ ; γ = iσ ; γ = iσ [26, 27]. where σj are the Pauli-σ matrices. 2 fγµ; γν g = 2ηµν . Chern-Simons (CS) terms are written Chiral mirror symmetry says that the IR (g ! 1) µνρ 012 3 as AdB ≡ Aµ@ν Bρ with = 1. Besides the rele- limit of theory B has the free field description given by vant bosonic and fermionic mass terms, theory A admits theory A. a relevant perturbation proportional to jvj4 (which will In order to understand the RG flows below, let us now play a key role below), and a classically marginal inter- discuss the map of relevant deformations.σ ^J and D^ J action jvj2ΨΨ.¯ give rise to masses in theory A via (3). These parame- The A^J gauge field can be included in a background ters are external backgrounds for the U(1)J supercurrent, ^ vector multiplet V^J = (A^J ; σ^J ; λJ ; D^ J ) with the cou- and are mapped exactly to theory B according to the last plings occurring in (2) dictated by unbroken N = 2 su- line in (6). If we further restrict to high energies, theory persymmetry: B is weakly coupled and σ and D may be integrated out to show thatσ ^J and D^ J produce masses for u and . 2 2 ^ The other renormalizable deformations of theory A, jvj4 mv =σ ^J + DJ ; mΨ =σ ^J : (3) and jvj2ΨΨ,¯ do not correspond to conserved currents, Chiral mirror symmetry allows us to map all components and hence their effect in theory B is more involved. Nev- in this multiplet across the duality. The scalarσ ^J and ertheless, we may derive an approximate correspondence ∗ D-term D^ J , in particular, play important roles in our by noting that v Ψ ∼ λ from the quantum numbers in 2 ^ derivation. both theories, and jvj ∼ σ from the couplings of DJ on Theory B is N = 2 SQED with a single chiral flavor both sides. These also agree with the Taub-NUT map of 4 (u; ) and U(1)a gauge group. The corresponding charge the underlying N = 4 theory [31, 32]. Therefore, jvj and assignments are given below. jvj2ΨΨ¯ map to masses for σ and the gaugino in theory B. We stress that this map is approximate and is expected U(1)J U(1)R U(1)a to receive large quantum corrections in the IR. u 0 0 -1 0 -1 -1 III. DYNAMICS AND PHASES OF THEORY A 2 (4) e2πiγ=g 1 0 0 σ 0 0 0 Theory A has four distinct phases parameterized by 2 λ 0 -1 0 the signs of the effective masses mv and mΨ { see Fig. 1. These gapped phases can be invariantly characterized σ is the real scalar partner of the dynamical 3d gauge field 4 µ aµ, λ is the gaugino , and γ is the dual photon (@ γ = 1 µνρ 2π @ν aρ). Including the background U(1)J;R terms considered previously, the dual theory B Lagrangian: (B) L = LV + Lmatter + LCS − LBF (5) with 1 1 2 1 2 ¯ 1 2 LV = − f + (@σ) + λiD= ^ λ + D ; g2 4 µν 2 −AR 2 L = jD uj2 + ¯iD= − (σ2 − D)juj2 matter −a −a−A^R + σ ¯ + u∗λψ¯ + u ¯λ ; 1 L = (ada + 2Dσ + λλ¯ ); (6) CS 8π 1 1 LBF = adA^J + D^ J σ +σ ^J D + adA^R : 2π 4π FIG. 1: Phase diagram of theory A. Massless fields occur along the red lines (second order phase transitions). fµν = @µaν −@ν aµ is the field strength of the U(1)a gauge field. 5 by their responses to the background A^J;R fields. Inte- grating out the massive degrees of freedom according to 3 We denote the effect of integrating out a single Dirac fermion of sgn(m) unit charge and mass m by the level-1=2 CS term 8π AdA in the Wilsonian effective Lagrangian. A gauge-invariant expression 5 This statement is slightly imprecise as the response can be mod- utilizes the eta-invariant { see [8, 29, 30] for further information. ified by regularization-dependent contact terms [33]; the differ- 4 λ is the charge-conjugate of the fermion that appears in the ence of the response across a phase transition is, however, phys- conventionally-defined N = 2 vector multiplet. ical and this is how our expressions should be understood. 3 the prescription in Fig. 1, this response is captured by the effective Lagrangians: 1 LI = − A^ dA^ ; 4π J J LII = 0; 1 LIII = − bd(A^ + A^ ); 2π J R 1 1 LIV = − A^ dA^ − bd(A^ + A^ ): (7) 4π J J 2π J R For simplicity, we have truncated the effective La- grangians at the leading quadratic order in the deriva- tive expansion. In LIII and LIV, we introduced the 3d gauge field b [34] whose equation of motion imposes the symmetry-breaking constraint, FIG.