On Hearing's Eve, Trump Stands by Kavanaugh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Hearing's Eve, Trump Stands by Kavanaugh ABCDE Prices may vary in areas outside metropolitan Washington. SU V1 V2 V3 V4 Rain 66/60 • Tomorrow: Partly cloudy 75/61 B8 Democracy Dies in Darkness THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 . $2 President: On hearing’s eve, Trump stands by Kavanaugh China is DISMISSES CLAIMS AS ‘trying ‘CON’ BY DEMOCRATS to meddle’ Possibility of withdrawal floated after 3rd accuser BY SEAN SULLIVAN, He claims that Beijing, JOHN WAGNER angry over trade, aims AND GABRIEL POGRUND to hurt GOP in midterms President Trump forcefully dis- missed the accusations of sexual misconduct against Supreme BY DAVID NAKAMURA Court nominee Brett M. Ka- AND ELLEN NAKASHIMA vanaugh on Wednesday, saying his views have been affected by new york — President Trump on allegations he has faced in his Wednesday directly accused Chi- own life and vigorously denied. na of interfering in the U.S. mid- Trump accused Democrats of term elections this fall in retalia- orchestrating a “big, fat con job” tion for the ongoing trade war to scuttle the nomination of a between Washington and Beijing, highly qualified jurist, and he marking a new front in the deep- linked his opinions of the allega- ening hostilities that have threat- tions to his own life, in which he ened to upend bilateral relations. denied more than a dozen accusa- The president made the allega- tions of sexual assault and harass- tion during his opening remarks ment as a candidate for president. at a U.N. Security Council meeting “It does impact my opinion, on nonproliferation, asserting you know why? Because I’ve had a that China “has been attempting lot of false charges made against to interfere in our upcoming 2018 me,” Trump said at a news confer- election, coming up in November, ence in New York, where he at- against my administration. They tended the U.N. General Assem- do not want me or us to win bly. “So when I see it, I view it because I am the first president to differently than somebody sitting ever challenge China on trade, EVAN VUCCI/ASSOCIATED PRESS at home watching television.” and we are winning on trade — we President Trump said claims made against him have affected his views of the misconduct allegations against Brett M. Kavanaugh. The president also injected an are winning on every level. We element of uncertainty in an al- don’t want them to meddle or ready chaotic confirmation proc- interfere in our upcoming elec- Today’s hearing ess, saying he “can be persuaded” tion.” President calls #MeToo era ‘dangerous,’ unfair to men to believe Kavanaugh’s accusers Trump presented no evidence Supreme Court nominee Brett M. and was open to withdrawing the for his claims, and his top nation- BY PHILIP RUCKER, Trump’s expansive argument including many, Trump acknowl- Kavanaugh and the woman who nomination, “if I thought he was al security advisers told reporters ROBERT COSTA, cast doubt on the credibility not edged, who have been his friends. has accused him of sexually guilty.” in August they had not found JOSH DAWSEY only of the three women who have “When you are guilty until assaulting her when both were Trump’s comments came on specific examples of interference AND ASHLEY PARKER accused Kavanaugh of sexual as- proven innocent, it’s just not sup- teenagers are set to testify the eve of a consequential Senate ahead of the midterms from coun- sault, but also on scores of other posed to be that way,” Trump told Thursday at a highly anticipated hearing pitting the 53-year-old tries other than Russia, though President Trump on Wednes- women who have claimed sexual reporters. “That’s a very danger- Senate hearing critical to his being judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals they warned it remained a possi- day placed himself at the center of abuse by prominent men, includ- ous standard for the country.” confirmed to the high court. for the District of Columbia CHINA CONTINUED ON A17 the anguished national debate ing the president himself. During a freewheeling, Time: 10 a.m. against Christine Blasey Ford, over sexual assault, suggesting in In his defiant rush to rescue 81-minute news conference who has accused Kavanaugh of In Trump’s shadow: World leaders his defense of embattled Supreme Kavanaugh’s nomination, Trump Wednesday in New York, Trump Format: Judiciary Committee sexually assaulting her when both become bit players at the U.N. A17 Court nominee Brett M. Ka- effectively sought to draw a line in was asked whether the sexual as- Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R- were in high school. vanaugh that the #MeToo move- the sand against the growing sault or harassment allegations Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein Ford’s allegation and claims ment was “very dangerous” and number of allegations that have brought against him by more than (Calif.), the committee’s top from another woman have roiled unfairly threatened an entire felled male authority figures in a dozen women — claims he de- Democrat, will give opening the Senate. A third woman ac- class of powerful men. politics, the media and business — TRUMP CONTINUED ON A8 statements. cused Kavanaugh of misconduct Fair-lending Christine Blasey Ford, who has on Wednesday, prompting a swift accused Kavanaugh, will give her denial from the judge and spur- o∞cial once opening statement. She will then ring Republicans on the Senate 3rd accuser has spent most of life around Washington face questions from Rachel Judiciary Committee to vow to Mitchell — the Arizona prosecutor investigate the accusations. cast doubt on BY MICHAEL E. MILLER, Julie School, located in a far less afflu- hired by the committee’s 11 Julie Swetnick, a Washington STEVE HENDRIX, Swetnick, 55, ent section of the same county resident represented by celebrity Republican senators — and the JESSICA CONTRERA is a Web where Kavanaugh lived and at- lawyer Michael Avenatti, said in a panel’s 10 Democratic senators. hate crimes AND IAN SHAPIRA developer who tended an exclusive prep school. sworn declaration that Ka- has held Swetnick’s father, 95, said The questioners will alternate. Each vanaugh was physically abusive has five minutes for questioning. BY ROBERT O’HARROW JR., Julie Swetnick, who Wednes- security Wednesday that he was shocked toward girls in high school and SHAWN BOBURG day became the third woman to clearances for to learn from a Washington Post After Ford testifies, Kavanaugh will KAVANAUGH CONTINUED ON A8 AND RENAE MERLE accuse Supreme Court nominee her work. reporter that his daughter had take her place at the witness table Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexual mis- made the explosive allegations. and face questioning from Mitchell The questioner: Spotlight will be A senior Trump appointee re- conduct, is an experienced Web on the lunar orbiter for NASA, and She said in an affidavit that Ka- as well as Republican and glaring for Arizona prosecutor. A11 sponsible for enforcing laws developer in the Washington area her mother was a geologist at the vanaugh was present at a house Democratic senators. against financial discrimination who has held multiple security Atomic Energy Commission — party in 1982 where she alleges Where to watch: C-SPAN, The heat is on 3: Flake, Collins and once questioned in blog posts clearances for her work on gov- has spent most of her life around she was the victim of a gang rape. major cable networks and Murkowski heavily lobbied. A12 written under a pen name wheth- ernment-related networks. Washington. Now 55, she grew up Kavanaugh immediately issued washingtonpost.com. er using the n-word was inherent- The child of two government in Maryland and graduated in a statement in response: “This is Trump lets loose: 81-minute Q&A ly racist and claimed that the bureaucrats — her father worked 1980 from Gaithersburg High SWETNICK CONTINUED ON A10 — From staff reports of bluster, falsehoods, insults. A12 great majority of hate crimes were hoaxes. Eric Blankenstein, a policy di- rector at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, expressed those and other controversial Blurring foreign-domestic trade line views more than a decade ago on a political blog he co-authored with of sturdy and steady writing in- to impose a 114.9 percent duty, or two other anonymous contribu- struments. A key part of its ap- tax, on Chinese competitors — tors. Pencil firm’s practices proach has been to use U.S. trade more than doubling the costs for In a 2004 post, Blankenstein highlight regulatory law to reap government benefits some other pencil manufactur- wrote that a proposal at the Uni- and protection as it also moved ers. versity of Virginia to impose debate in Washington almost all pencil production to But even as it receives these harsher academic penalties for Mexico and China. protections, its status as a U.S. acts of intolerance was “racial idi- The company has collected firm is unclear. It has shed hun- ocy.” He questioned how authori- BY DAMIAN PALETTA nearly $5 million in federal fund- dreds of jobs, and a key U.S. ties could know the motivation of ing aimed at victims of foreign agency removed Dixon’s designa- someone using a racial slur. Dixon Ticonderoga sold mil- trade abuse since 2005 and has tion as a “domestic” manufactur- “Fine . let’s say they called lions of the iconic No. 2 yellow requested millions more, accord- er because it made so few pencils him n----- ,” he wrote, spelling out pencils American children took ing to Customs and Border Pro- at its Georgia plant. the slur. “. would that make back to school this month. tection records. And the fact that At retailers such as Staples, them racists, or just a-------?” CHARLOTTE KESL FOR THE WASHINGTON POST But the 223-year-old firm has it has a Georgia distribution cen- Target and Amazon.com, The Blankenstein also wrote that Iconic U.S.
Recommended publications
  • How the Survey Was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist Poll of 1,183 National Adults This Survey of 1,183 Ad
    How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,183 National Adults This survey of 1,183 adults was conducted October 1st, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored in partnership with NPR and PBS NewsHour. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the contiguous United States were contacted on landline or mobile numbers and interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers. Mobile telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation from Survey Sampling International. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. Mobile phones are treated as individual devices. After validation of age, personal ownership, and non-business-use of the mobile phone, interviews are typically conducted with the person answering the phone. To increase coverage, this mobile sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of landline phone numbers from Survey Sampling International. Within each landline household, a single respondent is selected through a random selection process to increase the representativeness of traditionally under-covered survey populations. Assistance was provided by Luce Research and The Logit Group, Inc for data collection. The samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates for age, gender, income, race, and region. Results are statistically significant within ±3.8 percentage points. There are 996 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±4.2 percentage points. The error margin was adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Survey Was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist Poll of 997 National Adults This Survey of 997 Adults
    How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 997 National Adults This survey of 997 adults was conducted September 22nd through September 24th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored in partnership with NPR and PBS NewsHour. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the contiguous United States were contacted on landline or mobile numbers and interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers. Mobile telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation from Survey Sampling International. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. Mobile phones are treated as individual devices. After validation of age, personal ownership, and non- business-use of the mobile phone, interviews are typically conducted with the person answering the phone. To increase coverage, this mobile sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of landline phone numbers from Survey Sampling International. Within each landline household, a single respondent is selected through a random selection process to increase the representativeness of traditionally under-covered survey populations. Assistance was provided by Luce Research and The Logit Group, Inc for data collection. The samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates for age, gender, income, race, and region. Results are statistically significant within ±3.9 percentage points. There are 802 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±4.3 percentage points. The error margin was adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Christine Blasey Ford's Accusations Against Brett Kavanaugh: a Case for Discussion
    Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal Review Article Open Access Christine blasey ford‘s accusations against Brett kavanaugh: a case for discussion Abstract Volume 7 Issue 1 - 2019 Accusations made by Christine Blasey Ford against Brett Kavanaugh are serious and Scott A Johnson worthy of discussion. Forensically, this presents an opportunity to pick some of the Licensed Psychologist, Forensic Consultation, USA case apart to offer a better understanding of why these types of accusations are difficult to prove or disprove. Anyone can make an allegation of misconduct against someone Correspondence: Scott A Johnson, Licensed Psychologist, regardless of the truthfulness of the claim. Now that this case has been in the public Forensic Consultation, USA, Tel +612-269-3628, for some time, and we have heard from both Mrs. Ford and Mr. Kavanaugh, it is fair Email to examine some of the facts of the case. The intent is not to discredit Mrs. Ford or to support Mr. Kavanaugh but to examine the veracity of claims made to date. Mrs. Ford Received: October 25, 2018 | Published: January 04, 2019 presents with several concern areas suggesting that she has been less than credible in identifying the situation of the alleged sexual assault or that Mr. Kavanaugh was in fact her assailant. Mrs. Ford appears to have engaged in therapy to retrieve memories of the incident, which raises serious problems in and of itself. She also presented with memory difficulties during the hearing and the witnesses she identified have failed to corroborate her claims. She appears credible that she was sexually assaulted, though not credible in correctly identifying or placing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The GOP's Disgusting Crusade to Discredit Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Questioning and Criticizing Dr. Blase
    To: Interested Parties From: NARAL Pro-Choice America Date: September 19, 2018 In Their Own Words: The GOP’s Disgusting Crusade to Discredit Dr. Christine Blasey Ford After Dr. Christine Blasey Ford bravely spoke out about allegations of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault, Senate Republicans have launched a full-fledged attack on Dr. Blasey Ford, offering textbook examples of how not to treat survivors of sexual violence. ​ ​ Throughout the nomination process, Senate Republicans have desperately tried to paint Brett Kavanaugh as an “ally to women” to downplay the very real threat he poses to Roe v. Wade. ​ ​ But by attacking Dr. Blasey Ford, they have reached a new low. As Anita Hill said in a recent ​ op-ed, “The weight of the government should not be used to destroy the lives of witnesses who ​ are called to testify.” The statements below range from insulting Dr. Blasey Ford to blaming the victim by empathizing with Kavanaugh, following a playbook we’ve seen used before. They are further proof that the GOP is putting Dr. Blasey Ford on trial and trying to undermine, intimidate, and shame her because they realize Brett Kavanaugh’s long history of lying destroys his credibility. He is simply unfit to serve and his nomination must be withdrawn. Questioning And Criticizing Dr. Blasey Ford Trump said it’s “very hard for me to imagine anything happened” along the lines of Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegation. He said: "Look: If she shows up and makes a credible showing, ​ that'll be very interesting, and we'll have to make a decision, but … very hard for me to imagine anything happened.” [Twitter, 9/19/18] ​ ​ ​ Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Report
    POLITICAL REPORT POLITICAL REPORT A MONTHLY POLL COMPILATION Volume 15, Issue 7 • July/August 2019 IN THIS ISSUE: Donald Trump and 2020 (pp.1–3) | Revisiting Polls on Brett Kavanaugh (pp.4–7) Trump’s ReelectionPOLITICAL Prospects: Early Sentiments REPORT In recent polls, higher percentages of registered voters have said they definitely plan to vote against Donald Trump in 2020 than said the same about Barack Obama at a comparable time in the 2012 election cycle. On this page and the next, we put polls that ask about intention to vote for or against Trump in context. His favorabil- ity rating has been relatively low since before he was elected in 2016, and in Fox’s trends, definite opposition to Trump’s reelection tracks closely with strong disapproval and strongly unfavorable views of him. Q: If the 2020 (2012) presidential election were held today, would you . ? POLITICTrump in 2020 AL---–- REPOR Obama in 2012 --–-- T May Aug. Jun. Jan. 2019 2011 2011 2011 Definitely vote to reelect 28% 29% 28% 23% Probably vote to reelect 10 15 16 19 Probably vote for someone else 7 9 13 15 Definitely vote for someone else 46 42 36 36 Note: Samples are registered voters. The surveys shown above are ones taken in the year prior to each election year. Earlier surveys are not shown. In May 2019, 68 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2016 said they would definitely vote to reelect him in 2020; 84 percent of Clinton voters said they would definitely vote for someone other than Trump in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: the Year in C-SPAN Archives Research
    The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Volume 6 Article 1 12-15-2020 The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Robert X. Browning Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse Recommended Citation Browning, Robert X. (2020) "The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research," The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: Vol. 6 Article 1. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol6/iss1/1 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Cover Page Footnote To purchase a hard copy of this publication, visit: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/titles/format/ 9781612496214 This article is available in The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol6/iss1/1 THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL RHETORIC THE YEAR IN C-SPAN ARCHIVES RESEARCH Robert X. Browning, Series Editor The C-SPAN Archives, located adjacent to Purdue University, is the home of the online C-SPAN Video Library, which has copied all of C-SPAN’s television content since 1987. Extensive indexing, captioning, and other enhanced online features provide researchers, policy analysts, students, teachers, and public offi- cials with an unparalleled chronological and internally cross-referenced record for deeper study. The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research presents the finest interdisciplinary research utilizing tools of the C-SPAN Video Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump Jr. Lampooned Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Over Her Apparent Fear of Flying in a Tweet Thursday, As the California-Bas
    Donald Trump Jr. lampooned Dr. Christine Blasey Ford over her apparent fear of flying in a tweet Thursday, as the California-based college professor testified to Congress that she was assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh while the two were teenagers in suburban Maryland in 1982. "I'm no psychology professor but it does seem weird to me that someone could have a selective fear of flying," Trump Jr. tweeted. "Can't do it to testify but for vacation, well it's not a problem at all," he continued. Asked about reports that she had anxiety about flying and wanted Senate investigators to interview her at home in California, Ford said she was hoping to avoid a flight to Washington. "I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane," she said. Ford was asked about her fear of flying by Rachel Mitchell, a former sex-crimes prosecutor from Arizona, who noted that Ford has flown to Delaware annually to visit her family, and had traveled to vacation spots including Hawaii and the South Pacific by airplane. Mitchell was questioning Ford on behalf of the Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of the ongoing hearings on Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Psychologists who treat patients with fear of flying say Ford's account of her phobia rings true. "I watched her testify today and talk about her fear of flying, and it sounded exactly like one of my patients," said Dr. Martin Seif, a psychologist in Greenwich, Connecticut, who has treated over 2,000 patients for anxiety disorders involved with flying.
    [Show full text]
  • Metoo, Brett Kavanaugh, and Christine Blasey Ford
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2019 The Masculinity Mandate: #MeToo, Brett Kavanaugh, and Christine Blasey Ford Ann C. McGinley University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation 23 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 59 (2019). This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MASCULINITY MANDATE: #METOO, BRETT KAVANAUGH, AND CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD BY ANN C. McGINLEY I. INTRODUCTION: THE HEARING The fall 2019 Senate Judiciary Committee hearings involving Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony about then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh's al- leged behavior at a high school party gone awry and his emotional testimo- ny in response will be etched in American minds for the foreseeable future. Dr. Blasey Ford accused then-teenager Brett Kavanaugh of sexually as- saulting her in an upstairs bedroom as his friend, Mark Judge, egged him on. At the hearing, Blasey Ford's trembling voice and respectful demeanor softened the bite of the substance conveyed: she was 100 percent sure that she had been sexually assaulted and that Brett Kavanaugh was the attacker. Blasey Ford's occasional lapse into technical explanations using psycho- logical terms established her competence. The combination of vulnerability and competence led to the widespread belief that Blasey Ford's testimony was credible.' After Blasey Ford testified, Kavanaugh came out swinging, accusing the Democrats of corrupting the process and categorically denying that he had sexually assaulted anyone.2 For the second time in three dec- ades, the country was left with many questions about fairness, process, and sexual assault/harassment, and the role they should and do play in the nom- .
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Kavanaugh Investigation
    The Case for a Kavanaugh Investigation Since Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation last fall, dozens of state legislatures have responded by rushing to enact extreme anti-abortion laws that seek to overturn the core holding of Roe v. Wade. ​ ​ 1 This comes as no surprise to most, since President Trump repeatedly promised on the campaign trail that Roe would be overturned “automatically” once he had his choice of justices on the ​ ​ Court.2 Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh might soon fulfill this promise, coming to the Court with the imprimatur of the Federalist Society and a host of anti-choice organizations and with past opinions, speeches, and writings that indicate a deep-seated hostility toward Roe.3 ​ ​ Yet Justice Kavanaugh’s full views on abortion and Roe may remain hidden. This is because the ​ ​ Republican-led Senate used a fundamentally flawed and wholly inadequate process to supposedly fulfill its constitutional advice and consent responsibilities. Before the Supreme Court hears any one of the myriad abortion-related cases that are currently making their way through the litigation process, the American public deserves the full story on whether Justice Kavanaugh lied about believing Roe is settled law or worked on the constitutionality of ​ ​ abortion-related issues that would necessitate his recusal now that he sits on our highest Court. We also deserve the full story on whether Justice Kavanaugh lied about other issues, whether he sexually assaulted the multiple women who accused him of doing so, and whether he is ultimately fit to be a Supreme Court justice. As an initial matter, then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley abandoned prior precedent by making a request to the National Archives for Justice Kavanaugh’s documents from his tenure in the George W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Kavanaugh Investigation
    The Case for a Kavanaugh Investigation Since Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation last fall, dozens of state legislatures have responded by rushing to enact extreme anti-abortion laws that seek to overturn the core holding of Roe v. Wade.1 ​ ​ This comes as no surprise to most, since President Trump repeatedly promised on the campaign trail that Roe would be overturned “automatically” once he had his choice of justices on the Court.2 ​ ​ Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh might soon fulfill this promise, coming to the Court with the imprimatur of the Federalist Society and a host of anti-choice organizations and with past opinions, speeches, and writings that indicate a deep-seated hostility toward Roe.3 ​ ​ Yet Justice Kavanaugh’s full views on abortion and Roe may remain hidden. This is because the ​ ​ Republican-led Senate used a fundamentally flawed and wholly inadequate process to supposedly fulfill its constitutional advice and consent responsibilities. Before the Supreme Court hears any one of the myriad abortion-related cases that are currently making their way through the litigation process, the American public deserves the full story on whether Justice Kavanaugh lied about believing Roe is settled law or worked on the constitutionality of ​ ​ abortion-related issues that would necessitate his recusal now that he sits on our highest Court. We also deserve the full story on whether Justice Kavanaugh lied about other issues, whether he sexually assaulted the multiple women who accused him of doing so, and whether he is ultimately fit to be a Supreme Court justice. As an initial matter, then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley abandoned prior precedent by making a request to the National Archives for Justice Kavanaugh’s documents from his tenure in the George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Unreliable Narrators in Fiction and Law
    An Unusual Suspect? Unreliable Narrators in Fiction and Law Cathren Page† Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 I.Self-Undermining Unreliable Narrators ........................................................... 4 II.Traits of Unreliable Narrators ......................................................................... 5 III.Primary Examples of Unreliable Narrators .................................................... 6 A. Keir Sarafian in Inexcusable by Chris Lynch .................................. 6 B. Verbal Kint in The Usual Suspects (Spoilers Warning) .................. 6 C. Holden Caufield in The Catcher in the Rye ..................................... 7 D. Ted Bundy Litigation ....................................................................... 7 E. Brett Kavanaugh Senate Hearing ..................................................... 8 F. Former Congressman James Traficant’s Trials and Congressional Expulsion Hearing for Racketeering, Extortion, Bribery, and Tax Evasion ................................................................. 9 IV.Common Traits of Self-Serving Unreliable Narrators ................................... 9 A. Inaccuracy ...................................................................................... 10 1. In Fiction .................................................................................. 10 2. In Law ...................................................................................... 10 B. Misdirection ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Did Christine Ford Recant Testimony Re Brett Cavanaugh
    Did Christine Ford Recant Testimony Re Brett Cavanaugh Tod baby vaingloriously as monistical Wallas remortgaged her wattage wow ropily. Sometimes indicatory Hurley loathed her rising invigoratingly, but jocosely.lunitidal Trevar obligates someplace or inspiring fascinatingly. Gil is unsentenced and rubber-stamps bis as umptieth Irving foments taxably and solaced Have a potential witnesses in between you described an easy one nomination of ford did recant her husband, and editorial projects from president trump allies outside left to stop her? Democrat women in testimony, brett was trying to recant my questions but did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but they have a client preferences and yourself on the fateful party line after? And others did they responded to finally i did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but. Fbi investigation concluded that did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but after christine. She preferred confidentially would be able to back then was well in re, did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but are that it just walk a deprecation caused me bring her career like joe biden delivers remarks. Durbin about the ranking members of misconduct against him, much younger brother, did christine ford recant my way to alabama, just makes sense of maine, raise the pricey but. Holding the white house, blame the white house to point blame the intensity of questioning coming in re, did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but interesting to reach its public. And certainly saw his penis in re, from uncorrected closed, did christine ford recant testimony re brett cavanaugh but.
    [Show full text]