DOCSLIB.ORG

The GOP's Disgusting Crusade to Discredit Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Questioning and Criticizing Dr. Blase

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The GOP's Disgusting Crusade to Discredit Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Questioning and Criticizing Dr. Blase To: Interested Parties From: NARAL Pro-Choice America Date: September 19, 2018 In Their Own Words: The GOP’s Disgusting Crusade to Discredit Dr. Christine Blasey Ford After Dr. Christine Blasey Ford bravely spoke out about allegations of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual assault, Senate Republicans have launched a full-fledged attack on Dr. Blasey Ford, offering textbook examples of how not to treat survivors of sexual violence. ​ ​ Throughout the nomination process, Senate Republicans have desperately tried to paint Brett Kavanaugh as an “ally to women” to downplay the very real threat he poses to Roe v. Wade. ​ ​ But by attacking Dr. Blasey Ford, they have reached a new low. As Anita Hill said in a recent ​ op-ed, “The weight of the government should not be used to destroy the lives of witnesses who ​ are called to testify.” The statements below range from insulting Dr. Blasey Ford to blaming the victim by empathizing with Kavanaugh, following a playbook we’ve seen used before. They are further proof that the GOP is putting Dr. Blasey Ford on trial and trying to undermine, intimidate, and shame her because they realize Brett Kavanaugh’s long history of lying destroys his credibility. He is simply unfit to serve and his nomination must be withdrawn. Questioning And Criticizing Dr. Blasey Ford Trump said it’s “very hard for me to imagine anything happened” along the lines of Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegation. He said: "Look: If she shows up and makes a credible showing, ​ that'll be very interesting, and we'll have to make a decision, but … very hard for me to imagine anything happened.” [Twitter, 9/19/18] ​ ​ ​ Sen. Grassley said that he doesn’t know why Dr. Blasey Ford would need more time to prepare to testify. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said on ​ Tuesday that a woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault hasn't confirmed that she will testify publicly next week. Grassley told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt that his staff had reached out to Christine Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh’s accuser, over the past 36 hours but was still waiting for a response..."I don't know why you would need more time. She wants to talk to us. She told us she wanted to talk to us and you think the sooner the better," Grassley said. [The Hill, 9/18/18] ​ ​ VIDEO: Orrin Hatch: “Somebody’s mixed up… I think she’s mistaken.” Orrin Hatch said in ​ an interview aired on CNN, “I talked to him on the phone today. … He didn’t do that and he wasn’t at the party. There’s clearly — somebody’s mixed up… he’s a very strong, decent man.” When asked “do you believe him?” Hatch answered with an emphatic scoff, “yeah, I sure do.” When asked if he believed the accusers, Hatch answered “I think she’s mistaken, I think she’s mistaken something. But I don’t know, I don’t know her.” [Twitter, 9/17/18] ​ ​ Hatch: “The problem is, Dr. Ford can’t remember when it was, where it was, or how it came to be… There are some gaps there that need to be filled. [Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ ​ Grassley on Dr. Blasey Ford: “Why would you hire a lawyer back in August?” [Hugh ​ Hewitt, 9/18/18] ​ ​ Lindsey Graham asked of Dr. Blasey Ford, “why did she pay for a polygraph in August and why did she hire a lawyer in August...And who paid for” the polygraph? On Fox ​ News, Graham said, “Here’s what I want your audience to know: If Ms. Ford really did not want to come forward, never intended to come forward, never planned to come forward, why did she pay for a polygraph in August and why did she hire a lawyer in August if she never intended to do what she is doing?... And who paid for it?” [The Hill, 9/18/18] ​ ​ John Cornyn said, “The problem is, Dr. Ford can’t remember when it was, where it was, or how it came to be. There are some gaps there that need to be filled.” [Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ ​ Mitch McConnell spoke dismissively of Dr. Blasey Ford’s story: “an accusation of 36-year-old misconduct, dating back to high school” brought up in an irregular manner.” McConnell said in a floor speech, “This is what the Senate has considered for the past 70 days. In the Senate and around the country, almost everyone who went into this process with an open mind – who was prepared to give Judge Kavanaugh a fair hearing – has come away impressed. But now, an accusation of 36-year-old misconduct, dating back to high school, has been brought forward, at the last minute, in an irregular manner. It is an accusation which Judge Kavanaugh has completely and unequivocally denied.“ [Majority Mitch McConnell press release, 9/17/18] ​ Grassley criticized Dr. Blasey Ford for not sending the letter to him and claimed he would have shared a letter like Dr. Blasey Ford’s with the whole committee earlier. Grassley ​ criticized Feinstein for not sharing Dr. Blasey Ford’s letter earlier in the nomination process, though he acknowledged that she did not share the letter due to the wishes of Dr. Blasey Ford: We wouldn’t have needed a public hearing, like we’re going to have Wednesday [crosstalk] if Senator Feinstein had shared with me, or better yet Dr. Blasey had sent it to the chairman of the committee instead of the ranking member, we would have investigated this thing in July or early August and we could have done all the background work that needed to be done to fill in what the FBI did not gather for us.” [Hugh Hewitt, 9/18/18, audio begins around 19 minutes] ​ ​ ​ ​ Grassley expressed doubt that Dr. Blasey Ford would attend the hearing he scheduled on Monday. In an interview with Hugh Hewitt, Grassley frequently called into question whether or ​ not Dr. Blasey Ford would show up to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Grassley said, “We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours three of four times by email, and we’ve not heard from them, so it kind of raises the question do they want to, do they want to come to the public hearing or not?” He also said, “I would surely hope she'd come Monday. I mean, look at all the details she put in the Washington Post. She’s surely prepared. She hired a lawyer, I understand, back in August. Why would you hire a lawyer back in August?” [Hugh Hewitt, 9/18/18; Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ ​ Strong-Arming Dr. Blasey Ford Into Testifying Without Support Or A Thorough Investigation Sen. Grassley said that Dr. Blasey Ford is “not in a position to make conditions” about if and when she testifies to the Senate Judiciary Committee. When asked earlier in the day if ​ Republicans would consider allowing her to postpone testimony until an investigation was opened and completed, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a member of Republican leadership and member of the Judiciary Committee, said, “She’s not in really a position to make conditions in my view.” [NBC News, 9/19/18] ​ ​ Sen. Collins proposed that Kavanaugh’s attorney be allowed to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford. In a letter to the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. ​ Collins wrote: “I respectfully recommend that you invite the attorneys retained by Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh to pose questions during the hearing. Dr. Ford’s attorney would be ​ permitted to question Judge Kavanaugh, and Judge Kavanaugh’s attorney would question Dr. Ford. Each approach would provide more continuity, elicit the most information, ​ and allow an in-depth examination of the process.” [Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ Sen. Graham claimed Dr. Blasey Ford’s request for a full FBI investigation of the sexual assault allegations “is not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections.” In a tweet, Graham wrote: “Requiring an FBI investigation of a 36 year old ​ allegation (without specific references to time or location) before Professor Ford will appear before the Judiciary Committee is not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections.” [Twitter, 9/19/18] ​ ​ ​ ​ Sen. Cornyn said the Judiciary Committee wouldn’t call other witnesses: “We don’t want this to be a three-ring circus.” According to Fox News, Cornyn said the committee’s refusal to ​ call other witnesses was because: "We don't want this to be a three-ring circus. We want this to be an orderly and dignified presentation." [Twitter, 9/18/18; Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ ​ ​ Sen. Grassley said it wasn’t necessary for the Senate to give Dr. Blasey Ford a full investigation, “you’re talking about history. We’re not looking back. We’re looking forward.” His comments came in response to a question about why he wouldn’t call more ​ witnesses to testify, as the Senate did in the Anita Hill hearings. [Twitter, 9/18/18] ​ ​ Sen. Corker pushed for the Senate Judiciary Committee to rush to vote on Kavanaugh if Dr. Blasey Ford doesn’t testify at the proposed Monday hearing. He wrote on Twitter: “After ​ learning of the allegation, Chairman @ChuckGrassley took immediate action to ensure both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh have the opportunity to be heard, in public or private. Republicans extended a hand in good faith. If we don’t hear from both sides on Monday, let’s vote.” [Twitter, 9/19/18] ​ Senate Republicans said they intend to go forward with a vote on Kavanaugh if Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COLAB SLO Newsletter Vol 2 Issue 2 (February 2012)
    February 2012 Newsletter Volume 2, Issue 2 COLAB San Luis Obispo County 1 Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2012 JOIN US FOR AN INSPIRING AND FESTIVE EVENING WITH HUGH HEWITT ur Third Annual Dinner and Fundraiser keynote screening of researchers wishing to use the library O speaker, Hugh Hewitt, is one of America’s most resources. Hewitt suggested refusing admission to perceptive and exciting conservative teachers and researchers deemed "unfriendly" — specifically commentators. Often provoking but never doctrinaire, Hewitt Bob Woodward, whom he said was "not a will inspire us all to resist and ultimately triumph over the responsible journalist." John Taylor, a spokesman environmental-socialist juggernaught which has engulfed our for Nixon, overturned Hewitt's decision after two nation, state, and San Luis Obispo County. Some of Mr. days, but it became the subject of editorial rebuke Hewitt’s achievements and courageous positions are detailed in The New York Times anyway. in the article below entitled Hugh Hewitt:1 When he left the library to practice law, Hewitt Hugh Hewitt (born February 22, 1956) is an began a weekend radio talk show for the Los American radio talk show host with the Salem Angeles radio station KFI, where he broadcast from Radio Network, lawyer, academic, and author. An late 1990 to 1995. In the spring of 1992 he began outspoken Republican, evangelical Christian, he cohosting L.A. PBS member station KCET's nightly comments on society, politics, and media bias in news and public affairs program, Life & Times, and the United States. Hewitt is also a law professor at remained with the program until the fall of 2001, Chapman University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Law Review
    Chapman Law Review Volume 21 Board of Editors 2017–2018 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief LAUREN K. FITZPATRICK Managing Editor RYAN W. COOPER Senior Articles Editors Production Editor SUNEETA H. ISRANI MARISSA N. HAMILTON TAYLOR A. KENDZIERSKI CLARE M. WERNET Senior Notes & Comments Editor TAYLOR B. BROWN Senior Symposium Editor CINDY PARK Senior Submissions & Online Editor ALBERTO WILCHES –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Articles Editors ASHLEY C. ANDERSON KRISTEN N. KOVACICH ARLENE GALARZA STEVEN L. RIMMER NATALIE M. GAONA AMANDA M. SHAUGHNESSY-FORD ANAM A. JAVED DAMION M. YOUNG __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors RAYMOND AUBELE AMY N. HUDACK JAMIE L. RICE CARLOS BACIO MEGAN A. LEE JAMIE L. TRAXLER HOPE C. BLAIN DANTE P. LOGIE BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS MARLENA MLYNARSKA SYDNEY L. WEST KYLEY S. CHELWICK NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI Faculty Advisor CELESTINE MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY HAZEM H. CHEHABI ADMINISTRATION JEROME W. CWIERTNIA DALE E. FOWLER ’58 DANIELE C. STRUPPA BARRY GOLDFARB President STAN HARRELSON GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. GLENN M. PFEIFFER WILLIAM K. HOOD Provost and Executive Vice ANDY HOROWITZ President for Academic Affairs MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 JENNIFER L. KELLER HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. THOMAS E. MALLOY Executive Vice President and Chief SEBASTIAN PAUL MUSCO Operating Officer RICHARD MUTH (MBA ’05) JAMES J. PETERSON SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS HARRY S. RINKER Executive Vice President for JAMES B. ROSZAK University Advancement THE HONORABLE LORETTA SANCHEZ ’82 HELEN NORRIS MOHINDAR S. SANDHU Vice President and Chief RONALD M. SIMON Information Officer RONALD E. SODERLING KAREN R. WILKINSON ’69 THOMAS C. PIECHOTA DAVID W.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Survey Was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist Poll of 1,183 National Adults This Survey of 1,183 Ad
    How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,183 National Adults This survey of 1,183 adults was conducted October 1st, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored in partnership with NPR and PBS NewsHour. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the contiguous United States were contacted on landline or mobile numbers and interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers. Mobile telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation from Survey Sampling International. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. Mobile phones are treated as individual devices. After validation of age, personal ownership, and non-business-use of the mobile phone, interviews are typically conducted with the person answering the phone. To increase coverage, this mobile sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of landline phone numbers from Survey Sampling International. Within each landline household, a single respondent is selected through a random selection process to increase the representativeness of traditionally under-covered survey populations. Assistance was provided by Luce Research and The Logit Group, Inc for data collection. The samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates for age, gender, income, race, and region. Results are statistically significant within ±3.8 percentage points. There are 996 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±4.2 percentage points. The error margin was adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Precise Constitutional Text: the Argument for a “New”
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 61 Issue 2 Article 4 2013 Interpreting Precise Constitutional Text: The Argument for a “New” Interpretation of the Incompatibility Clause, the Removal & Disqualification Clause, and the Religious estT Clause—A Response to Professor Josh Chafetz’s Impeachment & Assassination Seth Barrett Tillman National University of Ireland Maynooth Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Constitutional Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Seth Barrett Tillman, Interpreting Precise Constitutional Text: The Argument for a “New” Interpretation of the Incompatibility Clause, the Removal & Disqualification Clause, and the Religious estT Clause—A Response to Professor Josh Chafetz’s Impeachment & Assassination, 61 Clev. St. L. Rev. 285 (2013) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol61/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERPRETING PRECISE CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT: THE ARGUMENT FOR A “NEW” INTERPRETATION OF THE INCOMPATIBILITY CLAUSE, THE REMOVAL & DISQUALIFICATION CLAUSE, AND THE RELIGIOUS TEST CLAUSE—A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR JOSH CHAFETZ’S IMPEACHMENT & ASSASSINATION SETH BARRETT TILLMAN* I. THE METAPHOR IS THE MESSAGE ........................................ 286 A. Must Senate Conviction Upon Impeachment Effectuate Removal (Chafetz’s “Political Death”)? ...................................................................... 295 B. Is it Reasonable to Characterize Removal in Consequence of Conviction a “Political Death”? ...................................................... 298 C. Is Senate Disqualification a “Political Death Without Possibility of Resurrection”? .............. 302 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Survey Was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS Newshour/Marist Poll of 997 National Adults This Survey of 997 Adults
    How the Survey was Conducted Nature of the Sample: NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 997 National Adults This survey of 997 adults was conducted September 22nd through September 24th, 2018 by The Marist Poll sponsored in partnership with NPR and PBS NewsHour. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the contiguous United States were contacted on landline or mobile numbers and interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers. Mobile telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation from Survey Sampling International. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. Mobile phones are treated as individual devices. After validation of age, personal ownership, and non- business-use of the mobile phone, interviews are typically conducted with the person answering the phone. To increase coverage, this mobile sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of landline phone numbers from Survey Sampling International. Within each landline household, a single respondent is selected through a random selection process to increase the representativeness of traditionally under-covered survey populations. Assistance was provided by Luce Research and The Logit Group, Inc for data collection. The samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2016 American Community Survey 1-year estimates for age, gender, income, race, and region. Results are statistically significant within ±3.9 percentage points. There are 802 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±4.3 percentage points. The error margin was adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2015 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data
    June 2015 Sunday Morning Talk Show Data June 7, 2015 23 men and 7 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 0 men and 0 women None CBS's Face the Nation with John Dickerson: 6 men and 2 women Gov. Chris Christie (M) Mayor Bill de Blasio (M) Fmr. Gov. Rick Perry (M) Rep. Michael McCaul (M) Jamelle Bouie (M) Nancy Cordes (F) Ron Fournier (M) Susan Page (F) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 6 men and 1 woman Gov. Scott Walker (M) Ret. Gen. Stanley McChrystal (M) Donna Brazile (F) Matthew Dowd (M) Newt Gingrich (M) Robert Reich (M) Michael Leiter (M) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 5 men and 3 women Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Fmr. Gov. Rick Perry (M) Sen. Joni Ernst (F) Sen. Tom Cotton (M) Fmr. Gov. Lincoln Chafee (M) Jennifer Jacobs (F) Maeve Reston (F) Matt Strawn (M) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 6 men and 1 woman Fmr. Sen. Rick Santorum (M) Rep. Peter King (M) Rep. Adam Schiff (M) Brit Hume (M) Sheryl Gay Stolberg (F) George Will (M) Juan Williams (M) June 14, 2015 30 men and 15 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 4 men and 8 women Carly Fiorina (F) Jon Ralston (M) Cathy Engelbert (F) Kishanna Poteat Brown (F) Maria Shriver (F) Norwegian P.M Erna Solberg (F) Mat Bai (M) Ruth Marcus (F) Kathleen Parker (F) Michael Steele (M) Sen. Dianne Feinstein (F) Michael Leiter (M) CBS's Face the Nation with John Dickerson: 7 men and 2 women Fmr.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Proceedings
    ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION PUBLIC HEARING ON THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS SPECIAL MEETING SPECIAL BOARD MEETING Costa Mesa, California Monday, October 20, 2014 Reported by: MARIA MAHIEU CSR No. 13260 JOB No. 13730R Electronically signed by Maria Mahieu (101-038-497-0614) d001978b-0c6a-4b36-894a-76d5f5622bd4 In Re: Common Core State Standards Date Taken: 10/20/2014 Witness: Transcript of Proceedings 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION 2 PUBLIC HEARING ON THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS 3 SPECIAL MEETING 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Special Board Meeting taken at Orange County 12 Board of Education, 200 Kalmus Drive, Costa Mesa, 13 California, beginning at 6:03 p.m. and ending at 14 9:07 p.m. on Monday, October 20, 2014, before 15 Maria Mahieu, Certified Shorthand Reporter 16 No. 13260. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 M and M Court Reporters, Inc. (714)972-2300 Fax (714)972-1616 Electronically signed by Maria Mahieu (101-038-497-0614) d001978b-0c6a-4b36-894a-76d5f5622bd4 In Re: Common Core State Standards Date Taken: 10/20/2014 Witness: Transcript of Proceedings 1 APPEARANCES: 2 3 FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: 4 Al Mijares, Superintendent 5 Nina Boyd, Associate Superintendent 6 Penny Dunseth, Recording Clerk 7 Linda Lindholm, Member 8 John W. Bedell, Member 9 Ken L. Williams, President 10 Robert M. Hammond, Vice President 11 David L. Boyd, Member 12 13 PANELISTS: 14 Claire C. Cavallaro 15 Celia Jaffe 16 Glen Thomas 17 Glen Warren 18 Robin S. Eubanks 19 Lydia Gutierrez 20 Hugh Hewitt 21 Gary Thompson 22 23 24 25 3 M and M Court Reporters, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Christine Blasey Ford's Accusations Against Brett Kavanaugh: a Case for Discussion
    Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal Review Article Open Access Christine blasey ford‘s accusations against Brett kavanaugh: a case for discussion Abstract Volume 7 Issue 1 - 2019 Accusations made by Christine Blasey Ford against Brett Kavanaugh are serious and Scott A Johnson worthy of discussion. Forensically, this presents an opportunity to pick some of the Licensed Psychologist, Forensic Consultation, USA case apart to offer a better understanding of why these types of accusations are difficult to prove or disprove. Anyone can make an allegation of misconduct against someone Correspondence: Scott A Johnson, Licensed Psychologist, regardless of the truthfulness of the claim. Now that this case has been in the public Forensic Consultation, USA, Tel +612-269-3628, for some time, and we have heard from both Mrs. Ford and Mr. Kavanaugh, it is fair Email to examine some of the facts of the case. The intent is not to discredit Mrs. Ford or to support Mr. Kavanaugh but to examine the veracity of claims made to date. Mrs. Ford Received: October 25, 2018 | Published: January 04, 2019 presents with several concern areas suggesting that she has been less than credible in identifying the situation of the alleged sexual assault or that Mr. Kavanaugh was in fact her assailant. Mrs. Ford appears to have engaged in therapy to retrieve memories of the incident, which raises serious problems in and of itself. She also presented with memory difficulties during the hearing and the witnesses she identified have failed to corroborate her claims. She appears credible that she was sexually assaulted, though not credible in correctly identifying or placing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Kay Coles James President, Heritage Foundation
    KAY COLES JAMES PRESIDENT, HERITAGE FOUNDATION u Life in Brief Quick Summary Hometown: Portsmouth, VA Conservative reformer whose experience growing up in poverty played profound role motivating Current Residence: Midlothian, VA entry to public policy and subsequent advocacy. After decades in Virginia and federal GOP policy Education circles, focuses on shaping a new generation of • BA, Hampton University, 1971 conservative leaders Family: • Cites formative early experiences in public • Husband Charles E. James, Sr. is housing with a mother on welfare and an alcoholic Director of the Office of Civil Rights at the father as fundamentally shaping views on US Department of Transportation importance of family, value of education, and • Three adult children need for welfare reform • Strong ties to Capitol Hill and conservative Work history policymakers through work in multiple presidential • President, Heritage Foundation, 2018- administrations and conservative advocacy Present • Active role mentoring young people with • President/Founder, Gloucester Institute, emphasis on education and self-sufficiency 2001-Present • Social conservatism rooted in devout Christian • Senior Partner, JC Watts Co, 2006- faith Unknown • Key outside influence quarterbacking advocacy • Senior EVP at MZM, Inc., 2005-unknown efforts for eventual passage of 2017 tax bill • Director, U.S. Office of Personnel • Management, 2001-05 Approach and Motivations • Dean, Regent University School of Govt., 1996-Unknown Reform-minded, merit-based problem solver • Virginia Secretary of Health & Human Resources, 1994-96 • Favors policies that reduce role and size of • SVP, Family Research Council, unknown government at state and federal levels dates • Argues for focusing less on social safety nets and • Associate Director, White House Office of more on merit-based incentives National Drug Control Policy, 1991-93 • Refers to herself as a solutionist rather than • Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Report
    POLITICAL REPORT POLITICAL REPORT A MONTHLY POLL COMPILATION Volume 15, Issue 7 • July/August 2019 IN THIS ISSUE: Donald Trump and 2020 (pp.1–3) | Revisiting Polls on Brett Kavanaugh (pp.4–7) Trump’s ReelectionPOLITICAL Prospects: Early Sentiments REPORT In recent polls, higher percentages of registered voters have said they definitely plan to vote against Donald Trump in 2020 than said the same about Barack Obama at a comparable time in the 2012 election cycle. On this page and the next, we put polls that ask about intention to vote for or against Trump in context. His favorabil- ity rating has been relatively low since before he was elected in 2016, and in Fox’s trends, definite opposition to Trump’s reelection tracks closely with strong disapproval and strongly unfavorable views of him. Q: If the 2020 (2012) presidential election were held today, would you . ? POLITICTrump in 2020 AL---–- REPOR Obama in 2012 --–-- T May Aug. Jun. Jan. 2019 2011 2011 2011 Definitely vote to reelect 28% 29% 28% 23% Probably vote to reelect 10 15 16 19 Probably vote for someone else 7 9 13 15 Definitely vote for someone else 46 42 36 36 Note: Samples are registered voters. The surveys shown above are ones taken in the year prior to each election year. Earlier surveys are not shown. In May 2019, 68 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2016 said they would definitely vote to reelect him in 2020; 84 percent of Clinton voters said they would definitely vote for someone other than Trump in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: the Year in C-SPAN Archives Research
    The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Volume 6 Article 1 12-15-2020 The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Robert X. Browning Purdue University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse Recommended Citation Browning, Robert X. (2020) "The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research," The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: Vol. 6 Article 1. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol6/iss1/1 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. The Evolution of Political Rhetoric: The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research Cover Page Footnote To purchase a hard copy of this publication, visit: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/titles/format/ 9781612496214 This article is available in The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ccse/vol6/iss1/1 THE EVOLUTION OF POLITICAL RHETORIC THE YEAR IN C-SPAN ARCHIVES RESEARCH Robert X. Browning, Series Editor The C-SPAN Archives, located adjacent to Purdue University, is the home of the online C-SPAN Video Library, which has copied all of C-SPAN’s television content since 1987. Extensive indexing, captioning, and other enhanced online features provide researchers, policy analysts, students, teachers, and public offi- cials with an unparalleled chronological and internally cross-referenced record for deeper study. The Year in C-SPAN Archives Research presents the finest interdisciplinary research utilizing tools of the C-SPAN Video Library.
    [Show full text]