DOCSLIB.ORG

Tijuana Municipal Agencies Baja California State Agencies Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tijuana Municipal Agencies Baja California State Agencies Federal 2/7/2014 Mexico’s water management history • Secretaria de Fomento y Colonización ,1877 • Dirección de Aguas, Tierras y Colonización, 1917 • Comisión Nacional de Irrigación, 1926 • Secretaría de Recursos Hidráulicos, 1946 Water Quality Management in the Tijuana River Watershed: • Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos, an overview of Mexican Local, State and Federal resource 1976 management agencies • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (1994‐2000) • Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2000‐Present) Oscar Romo © Runoff Tijuana Municipal Agencies MunicipalMunicipal Government Government Drinking • Municipal Secretariat of Urban Development Water • Municipal Secretariat of Social Development • State Government Wastewater Municipal Direction of Environmental Treatment Protection • Metropolitan Planning Institute Aqueducts and Dams Federal Government National Waters Baja California State Agencies Federal Agencies • State Water Commission • Ministry of the Environment and Natural • State Water Commission for Public Services Resources • State Environmental Protection Agency – National Water Commission • State Secretariat for Urban Development • Ministry of Social Development • State Secretariat for Social Developmnet • Ministry of Foreign Affairs – International Boundary and Water Commission, Mexican Section 1 2/7/2014 CNA Regionalization Baja California Watershed Council Mexico’s Water management Challenges U.S./Mexico Agreements 1) Insufficient potable water distribution, and sewer lines • 1848 Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty • 1853 Gadsden Treaty (Temporary IBWC) 2) Waste water treatment • 1882 Convention (Temporary IBWC) • 1905 Banco Convention (Colorado and Grand Rivers) 3) Erosion and deforestation • 1944 Water Treaty 4) Construction, maintenance and operation of hydraulic infrastructure. • 1983 La Paz Agreement • 1989 Minute 279 5) Disaster prevention • 1994 NAFTA (environmental side agreements) – NadBank 6) Underground water conservation – BECC – CEC 7) Investment needs 2 2/7/2014 Hydroregionalization of the U.S.‐ The U.S. Border Region Mexico Border NAFTA Organizations • Oldest binational organization in the America’s • Border Environment Cooperation Commission • Build and supervises border crossings, and • North American Development Bank environmental infrastructure projects for border communities • Commission for Environmental Cooperation • Manages and deliver water from shared resources TRW Bi‐national challenges • Tecate creek crosses the international • IRWM Plan Vision boundary 4 times • An integrated, balanced, and consensus‐based • All the water falling in the northern section of approach to ensuring the long‐term the TRW flows into Mexico before returning to sustainability of the Region's water supply, the U.S. at the TRV water quality, and natural resources. • Water rights • Water scarcity 3 2/7/2014 IRWM Plan Goals • IRWM Plan Mission • Improve the reliability and sustainability of • To develop and implement an integrated strategy regional water supplies. to guide the Region toward protecting, managing, • and developing reliable and sustainable water Protect and enhance water quality. resources. Through a stakeholder‐driven and • Protect and enhance our watersheds and adaptive process, the Region can develop natural resources. solutions to water‐related issues and conflicts that are economically and environmentally • Promote and support sustainable integrated preferable, and that provide equitable resource water resource management. protection for the entire Region. IRWM Plan Objectives Opportunities • Objective A ‐ Encourage integrated solutions to water management issues and conflicts • Improve and maintain coordination with Mexico’s • Objective B ‐ Maximize stakeholder and community involvement and stewardship water management agencies • Objective C ‐ Effectively obtain, manage, and assess water resources data and information • Support legislative work: • Objective D ‐ Further the scientific and technical foundation of water management – Local: City Council • Objective E ‐ Develop and maintain a diverse mix of water resources • Objective F ‐ Construct, operate, and maintain a reliable infrastructure system – Regional: State Assembly • Objective G ‐ Enhance natural hydologic processes to reduce the negative effects of hydromodification and flooding – Bi‐national: Federal Congress and Senate • Objective H ‐ Effectively reduce sources of pollutants and environmental stressors • Elevate TRW issues at the Federal level • Objective I ‐ Protect, restore, and maintain habitat and open space • Objective J ‐ Optimize water‐based recreational opportunities • Expand outreach efforts • Objective K ‐ Effectively address climate change through greenhouse gas reduction, adaptation, or mitigation • Innovative solutions • Trans‐boundary resource conservation efforts Questions? www.alterterra.org www.trashtracking.com www.sdcoastalstorms.org Oscar Romo 619-631-2375 [email protected] 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses
    Attachment B-4 San Diego RWQCB Basin Plan Beneficial Uses Regulatory_Issues_Trends.doc CHAPTER 2 BENEFICIAL USES INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USES ..........................................................................................................................1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE PORTER-COLOGNE WATER QUALITY CONTROL ACT ..1 BENEFICIAL USE DESIGNATION UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT .................................................2 BENEFICIAL USE DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BENEFICIAL USES ..................................................................................7 BENEFICIAL USES FOR SPECIFIC WATER BODIES ........................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF RARE BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................8 DESIGNATION OF COLD FRESHWATER HABITAT BENEFICIAL USE ...............................................9 DESIGNATION OF SPAWNING, REPRODUCTION, AND/ OR EARLY DEVELOPMENT (SPWN) BENEFICIAL USE ...................................................................................................11 SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER POLICY ..................................................................................11 EXCEPTIONS TO THE "SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER" POLICY................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study a Potential Trinational Protected Area: the Campo-Tecate Creek Kumiai Corridor
    DRAFT • NOT FOR QUOTATION Case Study A Potential Trinational Protected Area: The Campo-Tecate Creek Kumiai Corridor Katherine Comer1 ABSTRACT This paper outlines a “blueprint” for potential trinational protected area that would benefit the Campo Indian Reservation, the United States, and Mexico. On one end of the corridor the Campo Indian Reservation already boasts community- lead riparian protection programs, and 35 kilometers (km) downstream on the other end, Mexico has implemented a binational easement on sacred Kumiai lands at Servidumbre Cuchumá. These lands would serve as anchors for a 100 meter-wide biodiverse riparian ribbon through urban Tecate and rural San Diego lands. The benefits of a green corridor for the region would be ecological, hydrological, and social/cultural enhancement. Consistent with the Laguna Madre binational conservation area plan (TNC 2001), the blueprint uses two phases. In phase one, lands are protected within national boundaries, using a variety of instruments. Phase two “welds” the protected areas across boundaries. A seamless corridor might help bring greater attention, protection, and funding for the area from organizations such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Long-term goals for the region include the incorporation of lands adjacent to the river and lands beyond the Kumiai anchors. Thus, the riparian protected area would begin in the Laguna Mountains and terminate at the Tijuana Estuary on the Pacific Ocean. Estudio de Caso Un Área Trinacional Potencialmente Protegida: El Arroyo Campo-Tecate del Corredor Kumiai Katherine Comer RESUMEN Este escrito delinea un “plan” para el área trinacional potencialmente protegida que beneficiaría la Reserva India de Campo, los Estados Unidos y México.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego County Riverside County Orange County
    Chino Creek Middle Santa Ana River San Timoteo Wash Middle Santa Ana River Little Morongo Creek-Morongo Wash San Gabriel River 18070106 San Gorgonio River Headwaters Whitewater River Lower Santa Ana River Middle San Jacinto River Santa Ana River 18070203 Upper Whitewater River Temescal Wash Santiago Creek San Jacinto River 18070202 Whitewater River 18100201 San Diego Creek Lower San Jacinto River Upper San Jacinto River Newport Bay 18070204 Palm Canyon Wash O r a n g e C o u n t y RR ii vv ee rr ss ii dd ee CC oo uu nn tt yy Middle Whitewater River O r a n g e C o u n t y Middle San Jacinto River Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Jacinto River Deep Canyon Newport Bay-Frontal Pacific Ocean San Juan Creek Murrieta Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek 18070301 Wilson Creek Lower Whitewater River San Mateo Creek Santa Margarita River 18070302 Aliso Creek-San Onofre Creek Santa Margarita River Lower Temecula Creek Aliso Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Salton Sea 18100204 Santa Margarita River Upper Temecula Creek Coyote Creek Clark Valley San Felipe Creek San Onofre Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Camp Pendleton Bank Property Middle San Luis Rey River Upper San Luis Rey River Lower San Luis Rey River Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River San Felipe Creek 18100203 Escondido Creek-San Luis Rey River 18070303 Borrego Valley-Borrego Sink Wash Escondido Creek San Marcos Creek-Frontal Gulf of Santa Catalina Upper Santa Ysabel Creek 8-digit HUC Upper San Felipe Creek Sevice Areas Lower Santa Ysabel
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus (=Microscaphus))
    Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Photo by permission of Will Flaxington U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    1 Introduction The San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Region extends east from the Pacific Ocean, through one of the most populous areas in the nation, to the ridgeline of a forested mountain range (ACS, 2017). San Diego is an immensely complex border region consisting of 11 watersheds that jointly provide water sufficient to reliably meet only about 15% of the region’s current water demands. The region’s diverse habitats range from coastal to mountainous, and support more threatened and endangered species than any comparable land area in the nation (County of San Diego, 2009). Most of the 3.2 million people within the region inhabit the urbanized coastal areas, and the population of these areas is expected to increase by 29% percent by 2050, to over 4.0 million, according to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) forecast (SANDAG, 2013). The 2019 IRWM Plan Update presents an overarching assessment of the San Diego region’s water supply, water quality and ecosystem challenges and provides recommendations for The San Diego IRWM Region includes sustainable solutions. eleven parallel watersheds. Seeking and implementing integrated water management solutions is not new to the San Diego region. With average precipitation levels of only 10 inches per year at the coast, collaboration has been instrumental to overcoming the challenges of water scarcity. For example, the federal government assisted local agencies with water management issues in 1908 with the formation of the Cleveland National Forest to protect source water supplies. With the formation of the San Diego County Water Authority (Water Authority) in 1944, the diverse communities of the San Diego region formally banded together to build the aqueducts needed to import freshwater supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Type (Report Or Draft)
    APPENDIXC Detailed Table of Receiving Water Quality Conditions in the Tijuana River WMA W:\27671359\07000-a-r.docx APPENDIXC Detailed Table of Receiving Water Quality Conditions in the Tijuana River WMA This page intentionally left blank W:\27671359\07000-a-r.docx APPENDIXC Detailed Table of Receiving Water Quality Conditions in the Tijuana River WMA Table C-6-1 Receiving Water Conditions in the Tijuana River WMA Temporal Extent Hydrologic Receiving Water Condition Basis Area Wet Dry Lower Watershed Pacific Ocean Tijuana Shoreline at 3/4 Impairment of REC-1 due to Total Coliform, Valley x x 2010 303(d) List mile North of Fecal Coliform, and Enterococcus. (911.1) Tijuana River Tijuana Pacific Ocean Impairment of REC-1 due to Total Coliform, Valley Shoreline at end of x x 2010 303(d) List Fecal Coliform, and Enterococcus (911.1) Seacoast Drive Pacific Ocean Tijuana Shoreline, Tijuana Impairment of REC-1 due to Total Coliform Valley x x 2010 303(d) List HU, at Monument and Fecal Coliform (911.1) Road Pacific Ocean Tijuana Shoreline, Tijuana Impairment of REC-1 due to Total Coliform, Valley x x 2010 303(d) List HU, at the US Fecal Coliform, and Enterococcus (911.1) Border Pacific Ocean Tijuana Shoreline, Tijuana Impairment of REC-1 due to Total Coliform, Valley x x 2010 303(d) List HU, at Tijuana Fecal Coliform, and Enterococcus (911.1) River mouth Pacific Ocean Tijuana Shoreline, Tijuana Possible presence of pathogens including Public workshop Valley x HU, at Tijuana viruses and specifically Hepatitis A. testimony. (911.1) River mouth Tijuana Impairment of REC-1 due to Indicator Valley Tijuana River x x 2010 303(d) List Bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1966-70
    Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1966-70 Part 11. Pacific Slope Basins in California Volume 1. Basins From Tijuana River to Santa Maria River GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2128 Prepared in cooperation with the State of California and with other agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-608285 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02773-9 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the State of California and other agencies, by personnel of the Water Resources Division, J. S. Cragwall, Jr., chief hydrologist, G. W. Whetstone, assistant chief for Scientific Publications and Data Management, under the general direction of G. A. Billingsley, chief, Reports Section, and B. A. Anderson, chief, Data Reports Unit. The data were collected and computed under supervision of L. R. Peterson, district chief, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, Calif. Ill Page Preface. ....................................................................................... Ill List of gaging stations, in downstream order, for which records are published. ................. VI Scope of work. ................................................................................. 1 Cooperation. ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Rivers Cover
    U RBAN R IVERS IN T ECATE AND T IJUANA: Strategies for Sustainable Cities BY S UZANNE M. MICHEL AND C ARLOS G RAIZBORD Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias 2002 Cover photographs Photographs 1, 2, and 3 (upper row, left to right) depict Tecate River. Photograph 1 is upstream of the urban area and shows relatively undisturbed vegetation. Photograph 2 is in the center of the city, where the river is channelized and vegetation removed. Photograph 3 is downstream from Tecate’s center, on the outskirts of the urban area. Photograph 4 (bottom row) is of Tecate River in a relatively undisturbed area downstream from the urbanized area of Tecate. Photograph courtesy of Pronatura Península de Baja California. U RBAN R IVERS IN T ECATE AND T IJUANA: Strategies for Sustainable Cities BY SUZANNE M. MICHEL CARLOS GRAIZBORD Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias 2002 Published by Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias San Diego State University 5500 Campanile Drive San Diego, California 92182-4403 In collaboration with Fundación La Puerta, A.C. and support from The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation 2002 Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-925613-36-3 Contents List of Illustrations . iv Glossary . 1 I Foreword . 5 by Mario Salzmann II Rediscovering the Tecate River. 7 by Suzanne M. Michel III The Alamar River Project: An Urban Development for Baja California . 21 by Carlos Graizbord IV A Community Dialogue: Questions and Answers . 27
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Hydrology of the Binational Cottonwood Creek/Arroyo Alamar, California and Baja California
    FLOOD HYDROLOGY OF THE BINATIONAL COTTONWOOD CREEK/ARROYO ALAMAR, CALIFORNIA AND BAJA CALIFORNIA PROJECT NUMBER: W-00-5 VICTOR MIGUEL PONCE, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY NARRATIVE SUMMARY This report describes the flood hydrology study of Alamar Creek (Arroyo Alamar), located in the city of Tijuana, Baja California. The Alamar Creek is being considered for development by Tijuana’s Instituto Municipal de Planeacion (IMPlan). The project entails the river channel improvement from the intersection with the toll road to Tecate (Mexico 2) to its confluence with the Tijuana River, in the city of Tijuana. The length of the channel improvement project is 10 kilometers (km). The objective of this study was to determine the flood flows associated with return periods of two years to 1,000 years. The analysis has been performed using a generally applicable, deterministic conceptual model of rainfall runoff. In current hydrologic practice, this type of analysis is preferred to that based on parametric or statistical models. The latter require a long period of record, comparable to the predictive horizon (up to 1,000 years), which is not available for Arroyo Alamar. The methodology for the flood hydrology study of Arroyo Alamar is based on the use of a deterministic-conceptual model for the conversion of precipitation to runoff. It uses either the standard provided by the HEC-1 model of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1990), or its equivalent with a graphical user interphase, the HEC-GeoHMS model (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1998). The model used in this study is RAINFLO, developed by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Architecture of Arroyo Alamar, Tijuana, Baja California, México
    SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE OF ARROYO ALAMAR, TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO PROJECT NUMBER: W-03-16 VICTOR M. PONCE, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY ANA ELENA ESPINOZA, PIIETRO MAGDALENO, ALBERTO CASTRO, AND RICARDO CELIS NARRATIVE SUMMARY A methodology for the sustainable architecture of Arroyo Alamar, in Tijuana, Baja California, México, is presented. Sustainable river architecture enables a seamless interaction between diverse stream functions and uses, including flood mitigation, groundwater replenishment, compliance with federal stream zoning regulations, preservation of riparian corridors, enhancement of water quality, and multipurpose land use such as agriculture, light industry, sports and recreation, and urban aesthetics. Topographic, hydrological, hydroecological, hydraulic, vegetation, and land-use data were assembled to accomplish the sustainable architectural design of Arroyo Alamar. In addition, a socioeconomic study was performed to develop the appropriate basis for design. The flood conveyance channel is designed to carry the 10-year flood without restrictions and the 1000-year flood with some restrictions. Above the 10-year flood level, the 1000- year flood plain is allocated to soft uses, including recreation. Users of these features would move out of harm's way in the event of an unusual flood. The floodway is stabilized using gabion systems and natural vegetation. The sustainable architectural design considers three parks in one: recreational, sports, and ecological. The 10-kilometer reach of Arroyo Alamar is designed to reflect these uses. Sustainable river architecture successfully reconciles hydroecological laws and economic interests. It provides a clear societal benefit such as the inclusion of the river and its flood plain into the city's footprint. SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE OF ARROYO ALAMAR, TIJUANA, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO PROJECT NUMBER: W-03-16 VICTOR M.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Southern California with Special Reference to the Drought of 1944-51
    Water Resources of Southern California With Special Reference To the Drought of 1944-51 By HAROLD C. TROXELL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1366 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 55 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.. ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose and scope.............................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 6 What constitutes a drought? .................................................................................................. 6 Hydrologic factors._................................................................................................................ 8 Climate.................................................................................................................................. 8 Coastal area.................................................................................................................... 9 Mountain area..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]