Fedor Krause: the First Systematic Use of X-Rays in Neurosurgery

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fedor Krause: the First Systematic Use of X-Rays in Neurosurgery Neurosurg Focus 33 (2):E4, 2012 Fedor Krause: the first systematic use of x-rays in neurosurgery ALI M. ELHADI, M.D., SamUEL KALB, M.D., NIKOLAY L. MARTIROSYan, M.D., ABHISHek AGRAWAL, M.D., anD MARK C. PREUL, M.D. Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona Within a few months of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen’s discovery of x-rays in 1895, Fedor Krause acquired an x-ray apparatus and began to use it in his daily interactions with patients and for diagnosis. He was the first neurosurgeon to use x-rays methodically and systematically. In 1908 Krause published the first volume of text on neurosurgery, Chirurgie des Gehirns und Rückenmarks (Surgery of the Brain and Spinal Cord), which was translated into English in 1909. The second volume followed in 1911. This was the first published multivolume text totally devoted to neurosur- gery. Although Krause excelled in and promoted neurosurgery, he believed that surgeons should excel at general sur- gery. Importantly, Krause was inclined to adopt technology that he believed could be helpful in surgery. His 1908 text was the first neurosurgical text to contain a specific chapter on x-rays (“Radiographie”) that showed roentgenograms of neurosurgical procedures and pathology. After the revolutionary discovery of x-rays by Röntgen, many prominent neurosurgeons seemed pessimistic about the use of x-rays for anything more than trauma or fractures. Krause im- mediately seized on its use to guide and monitor ventricular drainage and especially for the diagnosis of tumors of the skull base. The x-ray images contained in Krause’s “Radiographie” chapter provide a seminal view into the adoption of new technology and the development of neurosurgical technique and are part of neurosurgery’s heritage. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12135) KEY WORDS • Fedor Krause • radiology • x-ray • neurosurgery • history of neurosurgery In discussing newer methods of examination, radiogra- Discovery of Röntgen or the X-Rays phy should be included. Above all other means of diagnosis it furnishes the most useful in tumors with calcareous or bony In November 1895, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discov- deposits as, for instance, in exostosis. ered the “X-rays.” On January 13, 1896, Röntgen person- 17 FEDOR KRAUSE ally demonstrated his new rays before Kaiser Wilhelm II, but he did not speak on his discovery elsewhere until a Among Harvey Cushing’s many accomplishments, memorable lecture before the Würzburg Physical Medi- he has been heralded as the first to use x-rays for neu- cal Society on January 23.6,8 The closing discussion of the rosurgical diagnosis.10 Upon closer inspection, the topic is more complicated, involving the seminal contribution lecture concerned whether Röntgen believed that it would of another, nearly unacknowledged for his earliest work be possible to make x-ray photographs of other human with x-rays in neurosurgery. This project traces the use of body parts beyond the bone, and whether surgery and x-rays by Fedor Krause (Fig. 1), who might be regarded as anatomy could benefit by the discovery. Röntgen believed more deserving of the accolade, and places his efforts in at the time that, because of the similar density of organs, the rays could not differentiate them. As mentioned by the context of contemporaneous events in the incorpora- 8 tion of a new technology. Indeed, 1908 was an auspicious Glasser, “Professor C. Schönborn [Karl Wilhelm Schön- year for neurosurgery, witnessing 2 major monographs born], a surgeon present, warned against too much opti- on neurosurgery by Cushing and Edward Archibald, as mism since the method scarcely promised to be of much, well as a textbook by Krause that heralded modern sur- if any value in the diagnosis of internal disturbances.” gical technique on neurological structures incorporating Glasser further wrote: x-rays. [Röntgen replied] that it was not difficult to photograph a Neurosurg Focus / Volume 33 / August 2012 1 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 12:39 AM UTC A. M. Elhadi et al. cal diagnosis.” In another letter to his mother on May 10, 1896, he stated “We have at least succeeded in having an X-ray machine put in for which I have subscribed largely and hope the conservative staff will ultimately remuner- ate us for it.”7,10 The first clinical use of x-rays in North America was by Williams and Codman in 1896, which started short- ly after its discovery in Röntgen’s laboratory. Cushing worked with Codman at the Massachusetts General Hos- pital with x-rays and then left for John Hopkins Hospital in 1896 with an x-ray tube. In Boston, attempts were made to demonstrate brain tumors by x-rays from 1896 through 1910. Williams,24 in the first text in North America on radiography, wrote of the technical problems with acquir- ing useful images: “Tumors in the brain with our present apparatus and inexperience must necessarily offer a great deal of difficulty to detection by the rays” (340). After his first use of x-rays on November 6, 1896, on a female patient who had sustained a gunshot injury Cushing wrote: It was in the fall of 1896 that I went to John Hopkins and made the first Roentgenograms that were taken there, with the aid of a decrepit and perverse static machine as big as a hurdy- gurdy and operated in the same way, by turning a crank. My first paper submitted for publication contained an account of a case of a gunshot wound of the spine showing a bullet which a Baltimorean had planted in the body of his wife’s sixth cervi- cal vertebra. I once showed these pictures to Dr. Cole and he expressed himself as astonished that such good plates could have been taken in 1896; but I do not know whether I told him, as I shall now confide to you, that the plates were the result of exposures averaging 35 minutes. And I may add that the pictures which were reproduced were not those of a single experience, for I think the patient was given as many as half a dozen sessions at least, before plates were secured which were sufficiently good for reproduction. Needless to say, she was a FIG. 1. Fedor Krause (1857–1937). Courtesy National Library of most cooperative patient. Subsequently a Will-young coil was Medicine, Bethesda, MD. purchased which I think had a spark gap of 2 or 3 inches. With this coil and many bottles of rodinol (I do not know if rodinol dog or cat according to his method and believed it would be is anything more than a memory for a few grey beards in this possible in the near future to make x-ray pictures of large parts audience), I spent many weary hours for the next year or two of the human body. He said that he, however, did not have in an improvised dark room off from the old amphitheatre at time to continue his experiments in that direction but that he the Johns Hopkins Hospital developing roentgen-ray plates in would be willing to lend the help of his experience for any such which no one at the time took any very great interest. Certainly experiments made in medical institutions. Thus this memorable no one of us could have had any possible conception of the lecture was ended. For every member of the large audience the increasingly important role of Roentgen-ray was to play in occasion was unforgettable. (51)8 clinical diagnosis and treatment.9 The world was promptly seized with what can only Cushing published on the use of x-ray applications in 2 be described as x-ray pandemonium; scientists, photog- spine cases in 1898. raphers, and hucksters quickly obtained x-ray apparatus. While Cushing was writing letters home, Krause’s Within a few weeks of Röntgen’s Würzburg meeting, work on his use of x-rays for surgery (The Importance Krause, working as a surgeon in the municipal hospital of of Röntgen’s Photogram’s for Surgery) had already been Altona, Germany, acquired an x-ray apparatus and began published twice in German scientific medical journals in exploring its potential applications for surgical diagnosis. March 1896 (in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift He began to use x-rays in his daily interactions with pa- and Münchener medizinische Wochenschrift). These tients and quickly amassed a huge experience.22 publications are recorded in the seminal book by Glasser8 on Röntgen. Concurrently in their 1900 text, An Ameri- X-ray Implementation in Neurosurgery can Text-Book of Surgery for Practitioners and Students, Keen and White stated that their use of x-rays was limited On February 15, 1896, shortly after Röntgen’s report, to localization of foreign bodies and fractures in difficult Cushing wrote enthusiastically in a letter to his mother, cases. In a chapter, “The Use of the X or Röntgen Rays in “Everyone is very excited over the new photographic dis- Surgery”, Keen commented: covery. Professor Röntgen may have discovered some- The Roentgen method is, of course in its infancy. It has, thing with his cathode rays that may revolutionize medi- however, reached already a degree of usefulness that makes it 2 Neurosurg Focus / Volume 33 / August 2012 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 12:39 AM UTC Krause and x-rays in neurosurgery obvious that the necessary apparatus will be an essential part of the surgical outfit of all hospitals, and will be employed constantly in a variety of cases. Those to which the method can now be applied with advantage may be summarized as follows, emphasis being placed on the fact that what is written to-day may require revision or reversal tomorrow, so rapidly are improvements and discoveries taking place.
Recommended publications
  • Landmarks in the History of Neurosurgery
    PART 1 General Overview 1 Landmarks in the History of Neurosurgery JAMES TAIT GOODRICH “If a physician makes a wound and cures a freeman, he shall receive ten running complex 21st-century stereotaxic frameless guided pieces of silver, but only five if the patient is the son of a plebeian or two systems. if he is a slave. However it is decreed that if a physician treats a patient In many museum and academic collections around the with a metal knife for a severe wound and has caused the man to die—his world are examples of the earliest form of neurosurgery—skull hands shall be cut off.” trephination.1–4 A number of arguments and interpretations —Code of Hammurabi (1792–50 BC) have been advanced by scholars as to the origin and surgical reasons for this early operation—to date no satisfactory answers have been found. Issues of religion, treatment of head injuries, release of demons, and treatment of headaches have all been offered. Unfortunately, no adequate archaeological materials n the history of neurosurgery there have occurred a number have surfaced to provide us with an answer. In reviewing some of events and landmarks, and these will be the focus of this of the early skulls, the skills of these early surgeons were quite chapter. In understanding the history of our profession, remarkable. Many of the trephined skulls show evidence of Iperhaps the neurosurgeon will be able explore more carefully healing, proving that these early patients survived the surgery. the subsequent chapters in this volume to avoid having his or Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • UCSF Neurosurgery News
    UCSF Neurosurgery News UCSF Department of Neurological Surgery Volume 16 Surgical Simulation Lab Drives Innovation for Skull Base and Cerebrovascular Disorders Skull base and cerebrovascular surgery are ranked relatively new field of minimally invasive skull base surgery, among the most difficult of the surgical subspecialties. which involves the use of an endoscope to navigate tiny Neurosurgeons must create corridors through tiny corridors through the nasal passages and sinuses. spaces between nerves, arteries and bone to access At UCSF Medical Center, head and neck surgeons and tumors and vascular lesions. Successfully navigating neurosurgeons often operate together on the same these critical structures requires a masterful grasp of patient, combining expertise on navigating both the neuroanatomy. sinuses and brain tissue. In the past, many lesions of “As a surgeon you cannot always rely on technology,” the skull base were considered inoperable or could only says Roberto Rodriguez Rubio, MD, director of UCSF’s be accessed through large, transfacial operations that Skull Base and Cerebrovascular Laboratory (SBCVL). left patients with significant disfigurement and morbidity. “If you do, you might miss something that could result But over the last decade, routes through the endonasal in a neurological deficit for your patient.” corridor to the clivus, infratemporal fossa, foramen In creating new anatomical models and surgical magnum, paranasal sinuses and intracranial lesions simulations, the SBCVL is currently at the forefront have all been described. of developing minimally invasive routes to complex In the realm of cerebrovascular disorders, Adib Abla, disorders and creating an entirely new way for students, MD, chief of vascular neurosurgery, describes how residents and faculty to experience the relationship anatomic dissections are revealing less invasive between different structures in the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Neurosurgery and Neurosurgical Giants
    HISTORY OF NEUROSURGERY/ INDIAN NEUROSURGERY AND NEUROSURGICAL GIANTS Moderator : Dr Manmohan singh Dr Sumit Sinha Presented by : Mansukh Sangani Neurosurggyery “Ol“Only the man who knows exactly the art and science of the past and present is competent to aid in its progress in the future” ‐Christian Albert Theodor Billroth Dr Mansukh Neurosurgery 1700 B.C.‐ Edwin Smith surgical Papyrus 460‐ 377 B. C., Hippocrates, Greece “Father of Western Medicine” Dr Mansukh Neurosurgery Edwin smith surgical papyrus ¾ Oldest of all known medical pppyapyri: 17 00BC ¾ Ancient Egyptian medical text on surgical trauma ¾ Contain actual cases & not recipes ¾ Rx : rational & mostly surgical ¾ Special interest to neurosugeon: Description of cranial suture , meninges ,surface of brain, csf , intracranial pulsations , headinjur y treatment Dr Mansukh Neurosurgery Hippocrates 460BC‐377BC Ancient Greek physician Father of Western medicine Hippocratic Oath DiiDescription of aphihasia, unconsciousness, pupillary inequality & opthalmoplegia, precise use of trephine Dr Mansukh Neurosurgery History of Neurosurgery‐ 1. 3 technological advances 1. Cerebral localization theory 2. Antiseptic/ aseptic techniques 3. Anesthesia‐ general / local 2. Neurosurgery becomes distinct profession Dr Mansukh Neurosurgery 1. Pre‐modern: before Macewan,,79 1879 Before all 3 tenets used in practice 2. Gestational: 187 9‐ 199919 Transition into distinct profession 3. Modern: after Cushing, 1919 Develops into distinct profession 4. Contemporary: present day Opppggerative microscope,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters Luders J
    Jürgen Lüders, M.D. EMPLOYMENT: Saint Mary’s Mercy Health Neurosurgeon with specialty in complex spine, epilepsy surgery and brain tumors. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: St. Mary's Mercy Health Chief of Neurosurgery Mercy Health Physician Partners Board Member/Chairman of Board Mercy Health Physician Partners Finance Committee Chairman Michigan State University College of Medicine Clinical Assistant Professor in Department of Surgery Saint Mary's Foundation Board of Trustee's Member EDUCATION: Board Certified Neurosurgery January 2012 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurosurgical Resident Cleveland, Ohio 1998-2003 Chief Resident 2003-2004 The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois M.D., June 1998 Royal School of Surgeons, in Ireland Dublin, Ireland Sept. 1992-June 1995 Washington University St Louis, Missouri B.A., Biology, May 1992 HONORS/AWARDS: Cleveland Clinic Foundation intramural grant for “Cellular Mechanisms of Blood Induced Epileptogenicity in an Animal Model of Seizures and in Patients with Cavernous Angiomas,” $18,275, 2002. Cleveland Clinic Neuroscience Research Day, Third Prize, Junior level, $250, 1999. Calvin Fentress Research Fellowship Award, $1,000, 1997/1998. Student Scholarship in Cerebrovascular Disease, Stroke Council of the American Heart Association, $2,000, Preceptor R. Loch MacDonald, 1997. Intramural Summer Research Fellowship Award, National Institutes of Health, 1994 and 1995. Exceptional Summer Student Award, National Institutes of Health, 1995. COMMENTS: Lüders HO. Lüders J. Comment: Hoh BL. Chapman PH. Loeffler JS. Carter BS. Ogilvy CS. Results after multimodality Treatment in 141 brain AVM patients with seizures: Factor associated with seizures incidence and seizure outcome: Neurosurgery, August, 2002. Lüders HO. Lüders J. Comment: Byrne JV. Boardman P.
    [Show full text]
  • DWI in Transient Global Amnesia and TIA: Proposal for an Ischaemic Origin of TGA K Winbeck, T Etgen, H G Von Einsiedel, M Ro¨Ttinger, D Sander
    438 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.048058 on 16 February 2005. Downloaded from SHORT REPORT DWI in transient global amnesia and TIA: proposal for an ischaemic origin of TGA K Winbeck, T Etgen, H G von Einsiedel, M Ro¨ttinger, D Sander ............................................................................................................................... J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:438–441. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.042432 TGA was diagnosed strictly according to well established There are conflicting reports concerning signal intensity criteria.910 TIA was defined as an acute transient focal changes in transient global amnesia (TGA) using diffusion neurological deficit caused by vascular disease that reversed weighted imaging (DWI). We prospectively analysed DWI totally within 24 hours.11 All TIA and TGA patients under- signal intensity changes in TIA and TGA patients, and went an intensive diagnostic investigation including physical compared the clinical characteristics and risk factors of both and neurological examination, duplex sonography of the groups. Using DWI and conventional T1 and T2 weighted carotid arteries, transcranial dopplersonography, 12 lead turbo spin echo sequences, 28 patients with acute TGA (13 ECG, transthoracic echocardiography, and analysis of cardio- men, mean age 61.5 years) and 74 TIA patients (47 men, vascular risk factors such as body mass index, prevalence of mean age 62.4 years) were studied within 48 hours after smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, arterial hypertension, dia- symptom onset. Every patient underwent an intensive betes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, and carotid athero- diagnostic investigation. In 10/28 (36%) of the TGA patients sclerosis. We also determined the intima2media thickness and 21/74 (28%) of the TIA patients, DWI signal intensity (IMT) of the common carotid artery, as described pre- changes occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsilateral Hemiparesis and Its History for Neurosurgery: Same Side, Wrong Side
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS Neurosurg Focus 47 (3):E8, 2019 EDITORIAL Ipsilateral hemiparesis and its history for neurosurgery: same side, wrong side Mark C. Preul, MD The Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona EGINNING in the 19th century, ideas regarding spe- logical condition. The authors interestingly study publica- cifically localizing brain functions began to form tions or descriptions of ipsilateral hemiparesis from before and evolve. Within a century, intrepid approaches the use of magnetic resonance imaging, so it is possible Band investigations by such figures as John Hughlings Jack- to review the assessment of and conclusions regarding son, Pierre-Paul Broca, David Ferrier, Vladimir Betz, Kor- ipsilateral hemiparesis from the origins of the concept binian Brodmann, Victor Horsley, Fedor Krause, Walter through to the modern era. Carrasco-Moro et al.3 trace Dandy, and Wilder Penfield, among others, began to not the conceptual evolution of ipsilateral hemiparesis associ- only solidify descriptions of the localization of cerebral ated with a brain lesion up to the 1970s. Such scrutiny of function but also demonstrate them on the open brain and the original or primary sources is the key to the discovery correlate them with clinical and histological evidence.12,14 of new information or revision of incomplete or incorrect It was an era of the first craniocerebral topographic sys- conceptions regarding the mysteries of medical history, tems, developed to guide anatomical dissections of the and it is just plain enjoyable, and often humbling, to read brain and also to begin more precise brain surgery.15 With- the original texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Historia De La Cirugía De Epilepsia
    Artículo de revisión Historia de la cirugía de epilepsia Alonso-Vanegas MA,1 Bramasco Avilez A,2 Moreno Jiménez S1 RESUMEN Uno de los grandes triunfos de la neurocirugía moderna es el hecho de que muchos pacientes con epilepsia puedan ser curados, o presentar una mejoría significativa de esta enfermedad devastante, mediante diversos procedimientos quirúrgicos, con una morbimortalidad muy baja. La cirugía de epilepsia en su connotación actual se desarrolla gracias a la introducción de tres grandes avances para la medicina: anestesia, antisepsia y la localización cerebral. Esta revisión se enfoca en el trabajo visionario de numerosos investigadores desde los trabajos de Paúl Broca, quien establece la relación existente entre la afasia y el lóbulo frontal hasta la localización estereotáctica de áreas epileptógenas por Talairach y Bancaud. En este recorrido se analizan los trabajos de Hitzig y Fritsch, quienes publican sus resultados sobre estimulación cortical en perros; de Horsley, quien realiza cirugía de epilepsia con localización clínica del área epileptogénica; de Krause, quien realiza la primera estimulación cortical en humanos buscando localizar los focos epileptógenos; de Penfield, quien inicia las resecciones del lóbulo temporal para el manejo de la epilepsia, así como el desarrollo del electroencefalograma por Berger. Debido entonces al esfuerzo e ingenio de grandes hombres estamos hoy día más cerca de una solución definitiva, o al menos una mejoría importante para el paciente epiléptico, y la cirugía de epilepsia ha pasado a ocupar un lugar sobresaliente en los anales de la medicina. Palabras clave: cirugía de epilepsia, pioneros de la cirugía de epilepsia, Víctor Horsley, Wilder Penfield, Fedor Krause, Otfrid Foerster, historia de la epilepsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychomotor Seizures, Penfield, Gibbs, Bailey and The
    View Point Psychomotor seizures, Penfi eld, Gibbs, Bailey and the development of anterior temporal lobectomy: A historical vignette Prasad Vannemreddy, James L. Stone, Siddharth Vannemreddy, Konstantin V. Slavin Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Abstract Psychomotor seizures, referred to as limbic or partial complex seizures, have had an interesting evolution in diagnosis and treatment. Hughlings Jackson was the first to clearly relate the clinical syndrome and likely etiology to lesions in the uncinate region of the medial temporal lobe. With the application of electroencephalography (EEG) to the study of human epilepsy as early as 1934 by Gibbs, Lennox, and Davis in Boston, electrical recordings have significantly advanced the study of epilepsy. In 1937, Gibbs and Lennox proposed the term “psychomotor epilepsy” to describe a characteristic EEG pattern of seizures accompanied by mental, emotional, motor, and autonomic phenomena. Concurrently, typical psychomotor auras and dreamy states were produced by electrical stimulation of medial temporal structures during epilepsy surgery by Penfield in Montreal. In 1937, Jasper joined Penfield, EEG was introduced and negative surgical explorations became less frequent. Nevertheless, Penfield preferred to operate only on space occupying lesions. A milestone in psychomotor seizure diagnosis was in the year 1946 when Gibbs, at the Illinois Neuropsychiatric Institute, Chicago, reported that the patient falling asleep during EEG was a major activator of the psychomotor discharges and electrographic ictal episodes becoming more prominently recorded. Working with Percival Bailey, Gibbs was proactive in applying EEG to define surgical excision of the focus in patients with intractable psychomotor seizures. By early 1950s, the Montreal group began to clearly delineate causative medial temporal lesions such as hippocampal sclerosis and tumors in the production of psychomotor seizures.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Technique of the Supraorbital Key-Hole Craniotomy
    Technique Surgical Technique of the Supraorbital Key-Hole Craniotomy Robert Reisch, M.D., Axel Perneczky, M.D., Ph.D., and Ronald Filippi, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany Reisch R, Perneczky A, Filippi R. Surgical technique of the su- ever, in his pioneering description, Krause had al- praorbital key-hole craniotomy. Surg Neurol 2003;59:223–7. ready realized the essence of the subfrontal su- BACKGROUND praorbital exposure: the suprasellar anatomic The enormous development of microsurgical techniques structures are free for surgical dissection from an and instrumentation together with preoperative planning anterior direction of view and the anterior part of using the excellent preoperative diagnostic facilities available, enables neurosurgeons to treat more compli- the temporal lobe does not obscure the access to cated diseases through smaller and more specific deep-seated areas. approaches. In our institution, we have been using the su- METHODS praorbital subfrontal approach for more than 10 The technical details of the supraorbital key-hole crani- years. During a 5-year period between January 1997 otomy are described in this article as it has been evolving and December 2001, there were 511 patients suffer- in our experience for more than 10 years. After an eye- ing from a variety of tumors and vascular lesions brow skin incision with careful soft tissue dissection and single frontobasal burr-hole trephination, a supraorbital within the anterior, middle, and posterior cranial craniotomy is carried out with a diameter of about 1.5 ϫ fossa. In this report, we will describe the basic 2.5 cm. As a real frontolateral approach, the supraorbital surgical technique of our supraorbital key-hole cra- craniotomy avoids removal of the orbital rim, the lesser niotomy through an eyebrow skin incision.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2015, Volume 17, Number 1: 1-104
    Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics January 2015, Volume 17, Number 1: 1-104. January 2015 Intervening in the Brain: Ethics and Neurosurgery From the Editor Neuroethics: Perspectives from the Field, Circa 2015 3 Jordan P. Amadio Educating for Professionalism Ethics Cases Risk Perception, Bias, and the Role of the Patient-Doctor Relationship in Decision Making about Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery 6 Commentary by Michael L. Kelly Applying Guidelines to Individual Patients: Deep Brain Stimulation for Early-Stage Parkinson Disease 13 Commentary by Bryn Esplin, Andre G. Machado, Paul J. Ford, and Kara Beasley Duty-Hour Exceptions for Neurosurgery Residency Programs 23 Commentary by Nathan R. Selden and Michael M. Haglund Podcast Emerging Ethical Issues in Neurosurgery Interview with Paul Root Wolpe Medical Education Evaluating Simulation as a Teaching Tool in Neurosurgery 33 Brian D. Rothstein and Warren R. Selman In the Literature Integrating Ethics into Science Education and Research: Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues 37 Jonathan Riley and Jessica Emery www.virtualmentor.org Virtual Mentor, January 2015—Vol 17 1 State of the Art and Science Innovation in Surgery and Evidence Development: Can We Have Both at Once? 41 Brett E. Youngerman and Guy M. McKhann II Law, Policy, and Society Policy Forum Models of Neurosurgery International Aid and Their Potential Ethical Pitfalls 49 George M. Ibrahim and Mark Bernstein Medicine and Society A Preparatory Neuroethical Approach to Assessing Developments in Neurotechnology 56 James Giordano Art, History, and Narrative History of Medicine Technological Innovation and Ethical Response in Neurosurgery 62 Jayant Menon and Daniel J.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Neurosurgical Giants
    MODERN NEUROSURGICAL GIANTS MODERATORS: Dr. P. S. Chandra Dr. Vivek Tandon PRESENTED BY: Gaurang Vaghani Neurosurgery “Only the man who knows exactly the art and science of the past and pppresent is competent to aid in its progress in the future” Christian Albert TheodorBillroth Neurosurgery 1.Pre1.Pre--modern:modern: before Macewan, 1879 when all 3 tenets used in practice 2.Gestational:: 18791879--19191919 transition into distinct profession 3M3.Mod ern: after Cushing, 1919 develops into distinct profession 4.Contemporary: present day operative microscope, imaging advances, GKS HARVEY WILLIAMS CUSHING April 8, 1869- October 7, 1939. Born- as Tenth child . Cleveland, Ohio. Education-Yale University and Havard UiUnivers ity Surgery Residency- Johns Hopkins,Baltimore under William Halsted Neurosurgery under Kocher, at Bern and Sherrington at Liverpool. Started private practice. Became Associate Prof. Johns Hopkins. Also served in World War I. as rank of Colonel HARVEY WILLIAMS CUSHING First American Neurosurgeon Father of Modern Neurosurgery + Ernest Amory Codman: 1st anesthetic , “Ether Chart” First to map human cerebral cortex with faradic stimulation in conscious patients March 1909, first operation for Acromegaly 1910, Small silver clip (Cushing’s clip). HARVEY WILLIAMS CUSHING y Standardization of Surgical techniques- ◦ Compressing scalp for hemostasis, ◦ Waxing the bone edges, ◦ Hemostatic clips, ◦ Electrocautery, motor driven suction y Classified brain tumors with Percival Bailey y Experiment with cocaine nerve blocks, x coined ‘ Regional anaesthesia’ y Medical Historian: Biographer of Sir William Osler (Pulitzer, 1926) y Died on 77ctoctober ber1939,1939 –myo cardial infarction y Interestingly -Autopsy found colloid cyst in3rd ventricle Walter Edwards Dandy y April 6, 1886- April 19, 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy
    brain sciences Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy Edited by Warren W. Boling Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Brain Sciences www.mdpi.com/journal/brainsci Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy Special Issue Editor Warren W. Boling MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editor Warren W. Boling Loma Linda University Medical Center USA Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) in 2018 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/brainsci/ special issues/epilepsy) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-449-9 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-450-5 (PDF) c 2018 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Warren Boling Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy Reprinted from: Brain Sciences 2018, 8, 115, doi:10.3390/brainsci8070115 .............
    [Show full text]