DOCSLIB.ORG

Thursday, March 28, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thursday, March 28, 2019 CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:00 PM VTA Conference Room B-106 3331 North First Street San Jose, CA AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Committee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on a subsequent agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. 3. ORDERS OF THE DAY CONSENT AGENDA 4. ACTION ITEM -Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 28, 2019. REGULAR AGENDA 5. INFORMATION ITEM -Receive a presentation on the process and controls for delivering projects in the VTA Capital Program. 6. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors adopt the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 Program of 2016 Measure B projects and programs. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 7. ACTION ITEM -Reaffirm previous or provide new policy direction on the following remaining 2000 Measure A projects to ensure that the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of Directors' priorities: (A) Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover; (B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track; and (C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension. 8. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget. OTHER ITEMS 9. Items of Concern and Referral to Administration. 10. Review Committee Work Plan. (Flynn) 11. Committee Staff Report. (Flynn) 12. Chairperson's Report. (Liccardo) 13. Determine Consent Agenda for a future Board of Directors Meeting. 14. ANNOUNCEMENTS 15. ADJOURN In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, VTA will make reasonable arrangements to ensure meaningful access to its meetings for persons who have disabilities and for persons with limited English proficiency who need translation and interpretation services. Individuals requiring ADA accommodations should notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 48-hours prior to the meeting. Individuals requiring language assistance should notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 72-hours prior to the meeting. The Board Secretary may be contacted at (408) 321-5680 or [email protected] or (408) 321-2330 (TTY only). VTA’s home page is www.vta.org or visit us on www.facebook.com/scvta. (408) 321-2300: 中文 / Español / 日本語 / 한국어 / tiếng Việt / Tagalog. Disclosure of Campaign Contributions to Board Members (Government Code Section 84308) In accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no VTA Board Member shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than $250 from any party, or his or her agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency. Any Board Member who has received a contribution within the preceding 12 months in an amount of more than $250 from a party or from any agent or participant shall disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding and shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the decision. A party to a proceeding before VTA shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than $250 made within the preceding 12 months by the party, or his or her agent, to any Board Member. No party, or his or her agent, shall make a Page 2 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 contribution of more than $250 to any Board Member during the proceeding and for three months following the date a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding. The foregoing statements are limited in their entirety by the provisions of Section 84308 and parties are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law. All reports for items on the open meeting agenda are available for review in the Board Secretary’s Office, 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California, (408) 321-5680, the Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday prior to the meeting. This information is available on VTA’s website at http://www.vta.org and also at the meeting. NOTE: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY ACCEPT, REJECT OR MODIFY ANY ACTION RECOMMENDED ON THIS AGENDA. Page 3 Revised Agenda Item #4 Capital Program Committee Thursday, February 28, 2019 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Capital Program Committee (CPC) was called to order at 12:05 p.m. by Chairperson Liccardo in Conference Room B-106, 3331 North First Street, San José, California. 1. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Larry Carr Member Present Cindy Chavez Member Present Dev Davis Alternate Member N/A Susan Ellenberg Alternate Member N/A Glenn Hendricks Alternate Member Absent Chappie Jones Vice Chairperson Present Sam Liccardo Chairperson Present Howard Miller Alternate Member N/A Rob Rennie Member Present Rich Tran Member Absent A quorum was present. 2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS There were no Public Presentations. 3. ORDERS OF THE DAY There were no Orders of the Day. 4. Elect Committee Vice Chairperson for 2019 Chairperson Liccardo opened the floor for nominations for the position of 2019 Capital Program Committee (CPC) Vice Chairperson. The Committee nominated Chappie Jones as Vice Chair for 2019. M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to close the nominations and elect Chappie Jones as the 2019 CPC Vice Chairperson. NOTE: M/S/C MEANS MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Revised Agenda Item #4 RESULT: ELECTED VICE CHAIRPERSON – Agenda Item #4 MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie NOES: None ABSENT: Tran CONSENT AGENDA 5. Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018 M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018. 6. 2019 Capital Program Committee Meeting Schedule M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the 2019 CPC Meeting Schedule. RESULT: APPROVED – Agenda Items #5 - #6 MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie NOES: None ABSENT: Tran REGULAR AGENDA 7. Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget Chris Augenstein, Director of Planning and Programming; Scott Haywood, Transportation Planning Manager; and Carol Lawson, Fiscal Resources Manager, provided a presentation titled “Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget,” that described VTA’s budget process, types of funds, source of funds, and use of funds. Public Comment Doug Muirhead, Interested Citizen, suggested the CPC review the evaluation criteria. He expressed concern on Eastridge to BART Light Rail Extension Project, the use of copper wires for networks in River Oaks campus, and well removal at Chaboya Yard. Adena Levin, Interested Citizen, suggested prioritizing projects that improve efficiency, improve passenger service, and are fiscally sustainable. Roland Lebrun, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about Caltrain funding and the diverted Caltrain double tracking funds. Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) revisit budget framework and determine proper percentage use of operations and maintenance versus capital funds; 2) budget criteria should always be presented to the Board of Directors (Board); 3) suggested a two-year budget cycle with a four-year budget projection; Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 2 of 5 February 28, 2019 Revised Agenda Item #4 4) strategic location of charging stations for the Electric Vehicle (EV) buses; 5) results of the recommendations from the Ad Hoc Financial Stability Committee to the capital budget; and 6) expressed concern about operations cost of the Eastridge light rail connection. On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee reviewed and discussed the Proposed Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget. 8. FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal Marcella Rensi, Deputy Director of Programming and Congestion Management, provided a presentation entitled, FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Funding Proposal. Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) expressed concern about the debt service for 2016 Measure B; 2) prioritize projects that create revenue; 3) requested to receive an update on the amount of funds the organization will receive every two years; and 4) start conversation with Caltrain and Joint Powers Authority (JPA) regarding the grade separation and develop funding mechanisms that will benefit VTA. Public Comments Robin Roemer, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about the Charcot Overcrossing project. Mr. Lebrun commented on the following: 1) funding for BART Phase II; 2) integrated station plan for Diridon; 3) commended the City of Mountain View and Sunnyvale for their approach regarding grade separation; and 4) opposed the use of 2016 Measure B funds to refurbish Caltrain diesel trains. Ms. Levin commented about the funding for the State Route (SR) 85 Corridor, Caltrain grade separation, and BART Phase II. On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee received the FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal. 9. 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program Projects Carolyn Gonot, Chief Engineering and Program Delivery Officer; Ken Ronsse, Deputy Director of Rail and Facilities; and Jim Unites, Deputy Director of Transit Planning and Capital Development, provided a presentation entitled, 2000 Measure A Program Update. Public Comments Mr. Lebrun expressed concerns on the Eastridge to BART light rail and current design of the Diridon station. He suggested relocating the maintenance facility for BART Phase II and relocating the light rail station at Diridon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FACT SHEET: Transit Light Rail Speed and Safety Enhancements
    FACT SHEET: Transit Light Rail Speed and Safety Enhancements Project Description The Light Rail Speed and Safety Enhancements study has reviewed a series of speed and safety features designed to enhance light rail operations and efficiency. This study has developed conceptual designs and recommendations for safety, speed, and reliability enhancements in three study areas: one along North First Street, one in Downtown San Jose, and one comprised of key, low-speed zones and specific spot locations throughout the system. Project Goals • Enhance safety, mobility, and access for all travelers • Improve travel times and reliability for transit passengers • Increase transit ridership • Support community input and adopted land use and mobility policies Current Activities • Advancing project definition, technical studies, and conceptual design • Stakeholder outreach • Advancing signal timing changes on North First Street • Final design of a pilot project in Downtown San Jose • Securing additional funding North First Street The project area is along North First Street between Interstate 880 (I-880) and Tasman Drive. Light rail currently operates at 35 mph in the median of this stretch of North First Street which includes eight light rail stations and over twenty intersections. The project is focused on transit signal priority and traffic signal programming. Green lights will hold as the light rail approaches the intersection which will improve travel time. Traffic signals will be reprogrammed to adjust timing based on traffic patterns. This will reduce the time a green light is held after vehicles and pedestrians have crossed an intersection. The removal of left turns on Tasman at North First Street will reduce wait time for light rail, vehicles, and pedestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report
    Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Report of the Advisory Committee August 2002 Advisory Committee Imagine the possibilities. In September 2001, Maryland Department of Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari appointed 23 a system of fast, convenient and elected, civic, business, transit and community leaders from throughout the Baltimore region to reliable rail lines running throughout serve on The Baltimore Region Rail System Plan Advisory Committee. He asked them to recommend the region, connecting all of life's a Regional Rail System long-term plan and to identify priority projects to begin the Plan's implemen- important activities. tation. This report summarizes the Advisory Committee's work. Imagine being able to go just about everywhere you really need to go…on the train. 21 colleges, 18 hospitals, Co-Chairs 16 museums, 13 malls, 8 theatres, 8 parks, 2 stadiums, and one fabulous Inner Harbor. You name it, you can get there. Fast. Just imagine the possibilities of Red, Mr. John A. Agro, Jr. Ms. Anne S. Perkins Green, Blue, Yellow, Purple, and Orange – six lines, 109 Senior Vice President Former Member We can get there. Together. miles, 122 stations. One great transit system. EarthTech, Inc. Maryland House of Delegates Building a system of rail lines for the Baltimore region will be a challenge; no doubt about it. But look at Members Atlanta, Boston, and just down the parkway in Washington, D.C. They did it. So can we. Mr. Mark Behm The Honorable Mr. Joseph H. Necker, Jr., P.E. Vice President for Finance & Dean L. Johnson Vice President and Director of It won't happen overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Transit Oriented Development Best Practices February 2007
    FEBRUARY GREATER CLEVELAND 2007 REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY TOD in Practice San Francisco, CA Dallas, TX Boston, MA Baltimore, MD St.Louis, MO Portland, OR Washington DC Lessons Learned Establishing Roles Developing the Development Using Regional Strengths 1240 West 6th Street Cleveland, OH 44113 216.566-5100 TRANSIT ORIENTED www.gcrta.org DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES 2007 Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 1240 West 6th Street, Cleveland, OH 44113 216.566.5100 www.gcrta.org Best Practices Manual GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Table of Contents PAGE Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 TOD in Practice .................................................................................................................3 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA): San Francisco Bay Area, CA................................................................................5 Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART): Dallas, TX..............................................................15 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA): Boston, MA................................23 Metro: Baltimore, MD ..................................................................................................32 Metro: St. Louis, MO....................................................................................................36 Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met):
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Triennial On-Site Safety Review of Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (Vta)
    2017 TRIENNIAL ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (VTA) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 September 19, 2018 Final Report Daren Gilbert, Manager Rail Transit Safety Branch Safety and Enforcement Division 287047411 2017 TRIENNIAL ON-SITE SAFETY REVIEW OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) conducted this system safety program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting safety review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert, Rail Transit Safety Branch Program Manager Stephen Artus, Program and Project Supervisor Steven Espinal, Senior Utilities Engineer Rupa Shitole, CPUC Representative to VTA, Utilities Engineer Michael Borer, Rail Transit Operations Safety Section Supervisor Debbie Dziadzio, Senior Transportation Operations Supervisor Matthew Ames, Senior Transportation Operations Supervisor John Madriaga, Track Inspector Salvador Herrera, Track Inspector Michael Rose, Operating Practices Inspector Richard Fernandez, Operating Practices Inspector Adam Freeman, Equipment Inspector (Mechanical) James Matus, Equipment Inspector (Mechanical) Shane Roberson, Signal and Train Control Inspector Claudia Lam, Senior Utilities Engineer Specialist – Risk Assessment Jamie Lau, Utilities Engineer Arun Mehta, Utilities Engineer Howard Huie, Utilities Engineer Joey Bigornia, Utilities Engineer
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Changes in Santa Clara 2019 NTSP Route # 2019 NTSP
    Summary of Changes in Santa Clara 2019 2019 NTSP Changes from Current Network NTSP Route Name Route # 20 Sunnyvale Caltrain Santa Clara areas served include Santa Clara Station - Milpitas BART Square, Mission College, Agnew Rd., and Station (NEW ROUTE) Montague Expwy. 21 Stanford Shopping Merges two current routes: Route 35 and Center - Santa Clara Route 32. Caltrain Station 22 Palo Alto Transit Center None. - Eastridge Transit Center 23 De Anza College - Alum • Rerouted to remain along Stevens Creek Rock Transit Center Blvd. between Winchester Blvd. & Bascom Ave. • Decreased weekday frequency from 12 minutes to 15 minutes. 53 Sunnyvale Caltrain • Serves Santa Clara Caltrain Station via Station - Santa Clara Homestead Rd. This routing replaces part Caltrain Station of current Route 81. • Increased weekday frequency from 60 minutes to 30 minutes. 57 Old Ironsides Station - • Increased weekday frequency from 30 West Valley College minutes to 15 minutes. • Provides connections to other frequent routes (e.g. Routes 22, 522, 23, 523, 26, Orange Line and Green Line) 59 Old Ironsides Station - New route that services parts of current Valley Fair Transit Routes 60 and 23. Center (NEW ROUTE) • Connects Old Ironsides Station with Santa Clara Caltrain Station • Also connects to Valley Fair Transit Center via Forest Ave. 60 Milpitas BART Station - • Rerouted northern portion of route from Winchester Transit Santa Clara Station; serves San Jose Center Airport and Milpitas BART Station. • The current network’s northern portion of the route serving Monroe St., Great America Pkwy., Mission College areas are serviced by new Route 59. 330 Almaden Expressway & Discontinued due to low ridership.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
    06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • Grading California's Rail Transit Sta on Areas Appendix LEGEND
    ! Grading California's Rail Transit Sta3on Areas Appendix LEGEND: CONTENTS: Group 1 - Residen<al • BART Final Scores • LA Metro Final Scores Group 2 - Mixed • Sacramento RT Final Scores • San Diego MTS Final Scores • San Francisco MUNI Final Scores Group 3 - Employment • Santa Clara VTA Final Scores A+ 95% A 80% A- 75% B+ 70% B 55% B- 50% C+ 45% C 30% C- 25% D+ 20% D 5% D- 2% F below 2% Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! BART FINAL SCORES AVERAGE: C Final City Line Sta3on Raw Score Grade San SFO-MILLBRAE Civic Center/UN Plaza BART 90.60 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Montgomery St. BART 88.20 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 24th St. Mission BART 87.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 16th St. Mission BART 84.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Powell St. BART 84.10 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Embarcadero BART 83.80 A Francisco Oakland FREMONT Lake Merri] BART 77.60 A DUBLIN/PLEASANTON Berkeley Downtown Berkeley BART 74.50 A TO DALY CITY Berkeley RICHMOND Ashby BART 75.30 A- Berkeley RICHMOND North Berkeley BART 74.30 A- San SFO-MILLBRAE Glen Park BART 74.10 A- Francisco Oakland FREMONT Fruitvale BART 73.50 A- Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 19th St. Oakland BART 72.90 B+ San SFO-MILLBRAE Balboa Park BART 69.80 B+ Francisco 12th St. Oakland City Center Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 71.70 B BART Contra Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Costa SFO-MILLBRAE 66.20 B Centre BART Centre Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! Oakland PITTSBURG/BAY POINT MacArthur BART 65.70 B Fremont FREMONT Fremont BART 64.20 B El Cerrito RICHMOND El Cerrito Plaza
    [Show full text]
  • VTA Bascom CS Study__Attachc Existing Transit Condition.Pdf
    ATTACHMENT C EXISTING TRANSIT CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS AND a partnership of OPPORTUNITIES REPORT Public Review Draft | December 2017 MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 2017 To: Dan Amsden and Mukul Malhotra, MIG From: Sarah Peters, Andy Kosinski, PE, David Wasserman, and Lilian Ayala Subject: Existing Transit Conditions and Potential Improvements on Bascom Avenue SJ17-1708 This memorandum presents existing transit conditions along the Bascom Avenue corridor, which will inform the Bascom Avenue Complete Streets Study. The existing conditions covered in this memorandum include descriptions of the major destinations, route services, mode access to transit, bus stop conditions, and operational analysis of bus transit speeds and reliability. The Bascom Avenue corridor extends six miles from the north at Interstate 880 to State Route 85 in the south. The street is designated as a “Class 1 Arterial” with three lanes in each direction. For most of the segment it is in either the City of San Jose or unincorporated Santa Clara County, but it passes through the City of Campbell for 1.5 miles. The north and central sections of the corridor are primarily commercial, civic, or hospital, with the remaining areas being largely residential. KEY FINDINGS The existing transit system provides service to a majority of the north and central portions of Bascom Avenue. Although 54 stops are dispersed along the corridor, the major stops along Bascom Avenue, identified by ridership and transfer activity, were primarily located in the north and central portions of the corridor. The evaluation of major bus stops along Bascom Avenue have indicated that core bus stops are missing major amenities, such as seating and shelters, that would be expected for high ridership stops.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules & Fares
    ® Transit Information GA GA GA Great America Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Amtrak Capitol Corridor Schedule Information effective March 29, 2021 The Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) service provides weekday and Saturday commuter trains along the Altamont Corridor. ACE Capitol Corridor intercity rail & Lick Mill trains additionally stop at Santa Clara, Fremont, Pleasanton, Livermore, Vasco Road, Tracy, and Lathrop/Manteca. For more serves 18 stations along a 170- Capitol Corridor information visit www.acerail.com or call 1-800-411-RAIL. mile rail corridor, and offers a convenient way to travel between the Transit Center ACE operates free shuttles every weekday to provide convenient connections with major employment sites in Santa Clara Sierra Foothills, Sacramento, the San County. Shuttles are scheduled to provide service immediately following the rst three morning ACE train arrivals with timely to Sacramento Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley/San q to Auburn return service in the evening. Shuttles will arrive after the fourth incoming train and passengers should expect to wait for Jose. For information call 1-877-9-RIDECC Mon-Fri Sat-Sun/Holidays shuttles. All vehicles operating this service have bike racks, are lift-equipped, and are accessible to persons with disabilities. GA GA (1/2) RD,or visit CO, capitolcorridor.org. GA, SJD Train Depart Train Depart Santa Clara 524 6:31a 724 8:18a 528 9:01a 728 10:18a Fare Information effective January 2, 2019 Schedule Information effective March 29, 2021 Fare Information effective June 9, 2014 532 11:18a 736 3:18p q 511 Real-Time Departures Amtrak tickets are purchased for the length of each 538 3:19p q 742 5:18p 511 provides free, up-to-the-minute ACE Fares ACE passenger’s journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Routes
    280 Page 239 281 296 397 217 239 AC Transit U Milpitas SamTrans Donohoe East Dumbarton Express AC Transit MV Community Shuttle & MVgo Kato 217 239 ECR 280 281 DB1 DB DB1 U MV GO to Fremont BART Milmont 296 397 Willow 101 Palo Alto to Union City BART to Fremont BART Local service in Mountain View to San Mateo and commute-hour shuttles from 880 Arizona County Mountain View Caltrain station Dixon Clarke O’Connor E Bayshore 296 280 Fremont 239 66 246 Pulgas Washington 397 San Francisco Bay Dixon 247 Euclid Middlefield Manhattan W Bayshore Landing DB 280 Palo Alto 217 Menlo Woodland Take VTA to COVID-19 VaccinationEscuela Sites Jacklin Park 280 296 University Mountain 397 Casey El 281 C 680 246 247 Milpitas ECR am Palo Alto in View Jacklin o Tech Center R Palo Alto e Waverley a 66 l Stanford U 104 Shoreline Park McCarthy Legend Marine Milpitas Shopping 21 San Antonio Homer Crittenden City Hall DB1 Marylinn Center Alviso Temple Channing Garcia Shoreline Palo Alto GO Marina 9 44 Park Victoria VTA Transit Services 21 Amphitheatre 47 Abel City Hall Embarcadero Calaveras Great America Pkwy Stanford Oregon Expwy Louis Stierlin Bayshore GO Caltrain N 1st McCarthy Ranch Kaiser 281 288 Milpitas Yosemite 59 104 Weller 47 Milpitas Palo Colorado288L Zanker Shopping Center Sand Hill Middlefield Salado Gold Light Rail Sequoia 280 C 288 40 ha Ranch Main Quarry 288 rleston Arboretum Meadow BLUE LINE Fabian Moffett U Field Santa Teresa–Baypointe U 47 246 Alta 8 237 California Ave GO 104 47 Welch on Serra Palm Caltrain t C St 288L s Baylands 247 GREEN LINE
    [Show full text]