CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Thursday, March 28, 2019
12:00 PM
VTA Conference Room B-106 3331 North First Street San Jose, CA
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS:
This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Committee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on a subsequent agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing.
3. ORDERS OF THE DAY
CONSENT AGENDA
4. ACTION ITEM -Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 28, 2019.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. INFORMATION ITEM -Receive a presentation on the process and controls for delivering projects in the VTA Capital Program.
6. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors adopt the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 Program of 2016 Measure B projects and programs.
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 7. ACTION ITEM -Reaffirm previous or provide new policy direction on the following remaining 2000 Measure A projects to ensure that the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of Directors' priorities:
(A) Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover; (B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track; and (C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension.
8. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget.
OTHER ITEMS
9. Items of Concern and Referral to Administration.
10. Review Committee Work Plan. (Flynn)
11. Committee Staff Report. (Flynn)
12. Chairperson's Report. (Liccardo)
13. Determine Consent Agenda for a future Board of Directors Meeting.
14. ANNOUNCEMENTS
15. ADJOURN
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, VTA will make reasonable arrangements to ensure meaningful access to its meetings for persons who have disabilities and for persons with limited English proficiency who need translation and interpretation services. Individuals requiring ADA accommodations should notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 48-hours prior to the meeting. Individuals requiring language assistance should notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 72-hours prior to the meeting. The Board Secretary may be contacted at (408) 321-5680 or [email protected] or (408) 321-2330 (TTY only). VTA’s home page is www.vta.org or visit us on www.facebook.com/scvta. (408) 321-2300: 中文 / Español / 日本語 / 한국어 / tiếng Việt / Tagalog.
Disclosure of Campaign Contributions to Board Members (Government Code Section 84308) In accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no VTA Board Member shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than $250 from any party, or his or her agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency. Any Board Member who has received a contribution within the preceding 12 months in an amount of more than $250 from a party or from any agent or participant shall disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding and shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the decision. A party to a proceeding before VTA shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than $250 made within the preceding 12 months by the party, or his or her agent, to any Board Member. No party, or his or her agent, shall make a Page 2 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 contribution of more than $250 to any Board Member during the proceeding and for three months following the date a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding. The foregoing statements are limited in their entirety by the provisions of Section 84308 and parties are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law.
All reports for items on the open meeting agenda are available for review in the Board Secretary’s Office, 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California, (408) 321-5680, the Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday prior to the meeting. This information is available on VTA’s website at http://www.vta.org and also at the meeting.
NOTE: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY ACCEPT, REJECT OR MODIFY ANY ACTION RECOMMENDED ON THIS AGENDA.
Page 3 Revised Agenda Item #4
Capital Program Committee
Thursday, February 28, 2019
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Capital Program Committee (CPC) was called to order at 12:05 p.m. by Chairperson Liccardo in Conference Room B-106, 3331 North First Street, San José, California.
1. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Larry Carr Member Present Cindy Chavez Member Present Dev Davis Alternate Member N/A Susan Ellenberg Alternate Member N/A Glenn Hendricks Alternate Member Absent Chappie Jones Vice Chairperson Present Sam Liccardo Chairperson Present Howard Miller Alternate Member N/A Rob Rennie Member Present Rich Tran Member Absent A quorum was present.
2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
There were no Public Presentations.
3. ORDERS OF THE DAY
There were no Orders of the Day.
4. Elect Committee Vice Chairperson for 2019
Chairperson Liccardo opened the floor for nominations for the position of 2019 Capital Program Committee (CPC) Vice Chairperson. The Committee nominated Chappie Jones as Vice Chair for 2019.
M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to close the nominations and elect Chappie Jones as the 2019 CPC Vice Chairperson.
NOTE: M/S/C MEANS MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Revised Agenda Item #4
RESULT: ELECTED VICE CHAIRPERSON – Agenda Item #4 MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie NOES: None ABSENT: Tran
CONSENT AGENDA
5. Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018
M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018.
6. 2019 Capital Program Committee Meeting Schedule
M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the 2019 CPC Meeting Schedule.
RESULT: APPROVED – Agenda Items #5 - #6 MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie NOES: None ABSENT: Tran
REGULAR AGENDA
7. Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget
Chris Augenstein, Director of Planning and Programming; Scott Haywood, Transportation Planning Manager; and Carol Lawson, Fiscal Resources Manager, provided a presentation titled “Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget,” that described VTA’s budget process, types of funds, source of funds, and use of funds.
Public Comment
Doug Muirhead, Interested Citizen, suggested the CPC review the evaluation criteria. He expressed concern on Eastridge to BART Light Rail Extension Project, the use of copper wires for networks in River Oaks campus, and well removal at Chaboya Yard.
Adena Levin, Interested Citizen, suggested prioritizing projects that improve efficiency, improve passenger service, and are fiscally sustainable.
Roland Lebrun, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about Caltrain funding and the diverted Caltrain double tracking funds.
Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) revisit budget framework and determine proper percentage use of operations and maintenance versus capital funds; 2) budget criteria should always be presented to the Board of Directors (Board); 3) suggested a two-year budget cycle with a four-year budget projection;
Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 2 of 5 February 28, 2019 Revised Agenda Item #4
4) strategic location of charging stations for the Electric Vehicle (EV) buses; 5) results of the recommendations from the Ad Hoc Financial Stability Committee to the capital budget; and 6) expressed concern about operations cost of the Eastridge light rail connection.
On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee reviewed and discussed the Proposed Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget.
8. FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal
Marcella Rensi, Deputy Director of Programming and Congestion Management, provided a presentation entitled, FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Funding Proposal.
Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) expressed concern about the debt service for 2016 Measure B; 2) prioritize projects that create revenue; 3) requested to receive an update on the amount of funds the organization will receive every two years; and 4) start conversation with Caltrain and Joint Powers Authority (JPA) regarding the grade separation and develop funding mechanisms that will benefit VTA.
Public Comments
Robin Roemer, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about the Charcot Overcrossing project.
Mr. Lebrun commented on the following: 1) funding for BART Phase II; 2) integrated station plan for Diridon; 3) commended the City of Mountain View and Sunnyvale for their approach regarding grade separation; and 4) opposed the use of 2016 Measure B funds to refurbish Caltrain diesel trains.
Ms. Levin commented about the funding for the State Route (SR) 85 Corridor, Caltrain grade separation, and BART Phase II.
On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee received the FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal.
9. 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program Projects
Carolyn Gonot, Chief Engineering and Program Delivery Officer; Ken Ronsse, Deputy Director of Rail and Facilities; and Jim Unites, Deputy Director of Transit Planning and Capital Development, provided a presentation entitled, 2000 Measure A Program Update.
Public Comments
Mr. Lebrun expressed concerns on the Eastridge to BART light rail and current design of the Diridon station. He suggested relocating the maintenance facility for BART Phase II and relocating the light rail station at Diridon.
Ms. Levin expressed concern about the planned light rail expansion and BART extension from Diridon to Santa Clara.
Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 3 of 5 February 28, 2019 Revised Agenda Item #4
Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) expressed concern about the cost-effectiveness of extending light rail to Eastridge; 2) explore different modes of transportation and multiple uses for the light rail dedicated lanes; 3) consider ridership as a main criterion in making transportation decisions; and 4) work with City of San Jose and County of Santa Clara in looking at development sites.
On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee received an update on the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program Projects
OTHER ITEMS
10. Items of Concern and Referral to Administration
A Member of the Committee asked for the request for information (RFI) about the BART security.
11. Committee Work Plan
Mr. Flynn reviewed the Committee Work Plan.
On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee reviewed the CPC Work Plan.
12. Committee Staff Report
There was no Committee Staff Report.
13. Chairperson's Report
Chairperson Liccardo reported on two groundbreaking events: 1) joint event with Caltrans for the US 101 Managed Lanes on March 8, 2019; and 2) Mathilda/US 101/SR 237 Interchange on March 22, 2019.
14. Determine Consent Agenda for future Board of Directors Meeting
CONSENT:
None.
REGULAR:
None.
15. ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no Announcements.
16. ADJOURNMENT
On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 4 of 5 February 28, 2019 Revised Agenda Item #4
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Diaresco, Board Assistant VTA Office of the Board Secretary
Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 5 of 5 February 28, 2019 5
Date: March 25, 2019 Current Meeting: March 28, 2019 Board Meeting: N/A
BOARD MEMORANDUM
TO: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee
FROM: Chief Planning and Engineering Officer, Carolyn M. Gonot
SUBJECT: Process and Controls for Delivering Projects in the VTA Capital Program
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
BACKGROUND:
A capital project is defined an expenditure of over $5,000 for a long-lived asset, such as property and equipment used by VTA in its operations, which is expected to benefit future periods. This includes expenditures to improve or extend the useful life of a capital asset (such as a midlife overhaul as well as studies that lead to or inform future capital projects.
VTA’s Capital Program plans, administrates the prioritization process, implements, monitors and reports on the status of capital projects. VTA currently has a portfolio of approximately 280 very diverse active projects. These range from multi-year complex megaprojects (like BART Silicon Valley) to highway/Express Lane projects to technology projects to standard replacement of specialized tools and equipment, as well as various other categories of projects VTA requires to provide mobility solution for Santa Clara County.
The Capital Program has a well-established framework of processes and controls for helping ensure that each project contained in the portfolio of capital projects is successfully and efficiently implemented so that VTA receives maximum value from its capital investment. It should be noted, however, that as part of VTA’s ongoing effort to continually enhance quality and respond to changing conditions, these processes and controls are reviewed and revised periodically.
A broad overview of the VTA capital process and the associated internal controls in place to promote successful project delivery, promote transparency and accountability, and monitor and report on progress will be described in the following.
5
DISCUSSION:
The capital project process at VTA consists of project inception through close out using a formal practice and standard set of tools. Many of these standards are outlined in formal Work Instructions for required implementations by project managers and support staff. The main Project Control tools include the following:
• Financial Control o Separate, independent responsibility and process for establishing project budget, funds management, and invoice approval process o Segregation of duties and independent oversight and verification throughout project process o Multiple layers of independent review and approval for all invoices o Defined process and procedures to modify project budget • Document Control o Standard structure o Available to all team members o Used for project management and record keeping • Cost Control o Formal breakdown structure to identify cost types and manage budget o Project budget, fund and cost tracking o Monthly cost reporting to provide information to project team and management o Semi-annual summary cost information provided to Board o Formal and integrated process for invoice payment • Schedule Control o Establishment of project master schedule for all project phases o Review and management of construction contract schedules o Schedule preparation for program of projects for use in fiscal planning • Quality Control o Quality Assurance Plan used for all capital projects o Activities defined and audited for engineering products and construction work • Change Control o Change Control Board uses formal protocol involving Engineering, Construction and Contracts managers to ensure that all changes meet the predefined requirements.
Page 2 of 3 5
These tools are formalized and implemented on all capital projects. They are used by the technical administration team to manage the work and by the management team to review project progression and identify systemic problems that must be corrected. The management team trains technical administrative staff in the use of these tools and shares lessons learned and best practices with staff to ensure proper management of projects and program improvement.
Prepared By: Capital Program Team Memo No. 6946
Page 3 of 3 Agenda Item #5
Capital Project Process and Controls
Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 Overview
• Capital Project Consistency
• Project Control Tools
2 Capital Projects
• Improve transit service o Light Rail extension o Bus Rapid Transit o Bus stop improvements o Track upgrades
• Improve operations and maintenance o New facility equipment o Rehabilitate track or OCS o Replace aging material and equipment
• Reduce Congestion o Express Lanes o Construct/improve interchanges
• Third party support o Environmental mitigation
3 Project Controls
Manage project:
• Scope of Work (what to build)
• Budget (cost to build it)
• Schedule (time to build it)
• Quality (ensure meets expectation)
4 Project Phases
Planning
Development
Engineering Project Control Focus Construction
Operation
5 Uniform Process
All projects use project control protocols
Transit Highways Facilities
Project Controls
6 Project Controls
• Cost Control • Schedule Control • Quality Control • Document Control • Change Management
7 Cost Control
• Cost Estimate • Cost Tracking • Fund Distribution • Staffing Plan Cost • Cost Reporting
8 Cost Breakdown
LEVEL Project 1
Construction Real Estate Labor, Contingency 2 and Services and Procurements Support
Construction Property VTA Labor
3 Procurement ROW Prof. Services Services
9 Cost Control
10 Budget Control
11 Project Schedule
12 Schedule Control
13 Staffing Plan
14 Quality Control
Quality Control in Three Tier Approach
o Quality Assurance Plan used for all capital projects
o Quality Control required by each contractor
o Quality Assurance with audits of work
• Includes risk analysis and lessons learned
15 Document Control
Document Control o Standard structure o Electronic system o Available to all team members o Used for project management and record keeping . Engineering . Construction . Turnover
16 Change Management
Change Control Board
o Uses formal protocol for Construction Contracts
o Requires formal review of all changes over $50k
o Ensures that all changes meet the predefined requirements
17 Reporting
18 Reporting
Transparent
Real time available to team
Monthly staff/management reports
Semi-Annual Report to Board on each program (e.g., 2000 Measure A)
19 6
Date: March 25, 2019 Current Meeting: March 28, 2019 Board Meeting: April 4,2019
BOARD MEMORANDUM
TO: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee
THROUGH: General Manager, Nuria I. Fernandez
FROM: Director - Planning & Programming, Chris Augenstein
SUBJECT: FY2020 and FY2021 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal
Policy-Related Action: No Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No
ACTION ITEM
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors adopt the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 Program of 2016 Measure B projects and programs. BACKGROUND:
On November 8, 2016, the voters of Santa Clara County approved by over a two-thirds vote Measure B, a 30-year, ½ cent sales tax measure supporting transportation projects and services. The 2016 Measure B lists and describes the following nine program categories and corresponding amounts:
Program Category Amount (in 2017 Dollars) Local Streets & Roads $1.2 Billion BART Phase II $1.5 Billion* Bicycle & Pedestrian $250 Million Caltrain Grade Separations $700 Million Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements $314 Million Highway Interchanges $750 Million County Expressways $750 Million SR 85 Corridor $350 Million Transit Operations $500 Million *Capped at 25% of Program Tax Revenue
The ½ cent sales tax collection began on April 1, 2017. The validity of the Measure was
6
challenged in court and funds were held in escrow until January 30, 2019, when all appeals were exhausted and the Measure was upheld.
The VTA Board of Directors appropriated 2016 Measure B funds for projects and programs as part of its FY2018 and FY2019 budget adoption on June 1, 2017. These appropriations remain available to the projects and programs and do not expire at the end of the fiscal year.
FY2018 & FY2019 Adopted 2016 Measure B Budget ($ Millions)
FY18 FY19 Administrative Costs 3.30 3.30 Program Area FORMULA Local Streets & Roads 50.00 40.00 BASED Transit Operations Enhance Core Network 13.50 13.50 Innovative Transit Models Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares 2.50 2.50 Improve Amenities 1.30 Bicycle & Pedestrian Education/Encouragement 2.50 Capital Projects 13.33 Planning Projects 0.83
NEED/ BART Phase II 0.00 CAPACITY BASED Caltrain Grade Separation 7.00 Caltrain Corridor Capacity 6.30 SR 85 Corridor 12.00 County Expressways 50.00 Highway Interchanges 87.00 Total 308.86
Page 2 of 7 6
DISCUSSION:
VTA staff recommends that the Board of Directors appropriate 2016 Measure B funds for projects and programs in the following 2016 Measure B program categories for FY2020 and FY2021.
Proposed FY2020 & FY2021 2016 Measure B Budget ($ Millions)
FY20 FY21 Administrative Costs 3.30 3.30 Program Category Local Streets & Roads 40.00 40.00 Transit Operations Enhance Core Network 12.00 12.00 Innovative Transit Models 1.50 1.50 Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares 2.50 2.50 Improve Amenities 1.30 Bicycle & Pedestrian Education/Encouragement 2.50 Capital Projects 13.33 Planning Projects 0.83
BART Phase II 150.00 Caltrain Grade Separation 31.00 Caltrain Corridor Capacity 2.50 SR 85 Corridor 2.50 County Expressways 0.00 Highway Interchanges 119.90 Total $442.46
Administration
The VTA Board appropriated a total of $6.6 million in the FY2018 and FY2019 budgets. Of that amount, $1.65 million was reimbursed to the Transit Enterprise fund for the cost of the ballot measure. Approximately $400,000 has been expended on VTA labor for development of the 2016 Measure B program since the election. As the 2016 Measure B Program is in its infancy and to account for unforeseen activities, staff recommends that the VTA Board continue $3.3 million annual appropriations for FY2020 and FY2021 for administration and oversight of the Program.
Page 3 of 7 6
Local Streets and Roads
The VTA Board of Directors appropriated $90 million in the FY2018 and FY2019 budget to be distributed to the cities and the County for roadway maintenance, rehabilitation and complete streets activities. $40 million was allocated for each fiscal year, with the remaining $10 million being an estimate for a one-time advance to be distributed to the cities and County based on collections between April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017. VTA staff recommend continued appropriation of $40 million in FY2020 and in FY2021 for this purpose. This would result in a total Local Streets and Roads appropriation of $170 million for the four-year period.
BART Phase II
No appropriation was requested or made for FY2018 or FY2019. A total of $150 million is requested for pre-construction activities for FY2020 and FY2021.
Bicycle and Pedestrian
The VTA Board appropriated $16.7 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this program category. VTA staff recommends appropriating an additional $16.7 million for FY2020 and FY2021. If approved, the total four-year appropriation would be $33.3 million.
Caltrain Grade Separations
The VTA Board appropriated $7 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this program category. VTA staff recommend appropriating an additional $31 million for the FY2020 and FY2021 cycle. This would result in a total appropriation of $38 million. VTA’s Caltrain Grade Separation Implementation Plan will require $1 million. The $37 million balance will be available for cities to advance their project activities.
Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements
The VTA Board of Directors approved $6.3 million for FY2018 & FY2019, $2.0 million as part of the FY2018 and FY2019 adoption and an additional $4.3 million in June 2018. Of this allocation, $4.3 million is for the locomotive overhaul capital project led by Caltrain, without which increased service to South County cannot occur. An additional $750,000 will be used to begin a South County Rail Study that will study potential options for enhanced transit service, specifically heavy rail service, down to south county and will include Caltrain, Altamont Corridor Express (ACE), Capital Corridor, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC), the California State Transportation Agency (CALSTA), and the cities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, and San Jose.
The balance of the FY18/FY19 allocation and a staff recommended allocation of $2.5 million for FY2020 & FY2021 for work on the San Jose Diridon Station Plan brings the total appropriation of this program category for FY18 through FY20 to $8.8 million.
Highway Interchanges
The VTA Board appropriated $87 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this
Page 4 of 7 6
program category. VTA staff are recommending an additional $119.9 in appropriation for the FY2020 and FY2021 budget years. Two projects in the FY2020 & FY2021 request, the US 101 Southbound/Trimble Rd./De La Cruz Blvd./Central Expressway Interchange Improvements Project and the Charcot Avenue Overcrossing Project, are not fully funded for construction. VTA will work with the City of San Jose to secure the needed funds to complete construction. Attachment A provides a complete listing of projects, with currently approved and recommended additional appropriation.
County Expressways
The VTA Board appropriated $50 million for Expressways in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle. Implementation priorities for the program category are determined by the County of Santa Clara. County Roads and Airports is currently developing an implementation plan. VTA and County Roads staff agree that the existing appropriation is sufficient for activities likely to occur in the next two years. The County’s priority project listing will be presented to the VTA Board at a future meeting. No additional appropriation is recommended for this budget cycle.
SR 85 Corridor
The VTA Board of Directors appropriated $12 million for this program in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle. VTA staff are conducting a transit alternatives study for the corridor. The cost to complete the study is estimated to be $1.4 million. The remaining $10.6 million is allocated to the implementation of the five noise mitigation pilot projects identified by the SR85 Noise Abatement Study. Once the transit guideway study is complete, initial planning and feasibility analysis for the improvements that may emerge from the transit guideway study will need to be conducted. VTA staff recommends $2.5 million for the 2020 & 2021 fiscal years for these efforts.
Transit Operations
The VTA Board appropriated $33.3 million for this category in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle, and the Board further refined the distribution at its October 2017 meeting. VTA staff recommends appropriating the same amount and continuing with the same distribution for FY2020 and FY2021.
Transit Operations ($ Millions)
Previous New Total FY18 - Transit Operations Sub-category FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY21 Enhance Core Network $12 $12 $12 $12 $48.0 Innovative Transit $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $6.0 Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $10.0 Improve Amenities $1.3 $1.3 $2.6 Totals $33.3 $33.3 $66.6
Page 5 of 7 6
ALTERNATIVES:
The VTA Board may appropriate different amounts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the Board adopts the program as recommended, $442.46 million in 2016 Measure B funds will be appropriated for fiscal years 2020 and 2021. ADVISORY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019 meeting. Brief discussion was had on how to access currently available funds for the Local Streets and Roads, Bicycle/Pedestrian Education & Encouragement, and Highway Interchanges Program Categories. A TAC member requested that the Innovative Transit Service Models Competitive Grant Program be retroactive to include expenses beginning July 2019 should a project be awarded funding. Another TAC member requested that reference to the City of Mountain View be removed from the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category discussion in the memo, as it appeared that other cities were not eligible for the proposed FY20/FY21 allocation $31 million. The TAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item, with an amendment to remove the reference to the City of Mountain View in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category discussion in the memo.
The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019 meeting. Clarification was provided on the Noise Abatement Program in the Highway Program Category and the noise abatement pilot projects that will be constructed on SR85. A CAC member requested VTA adopt a policy to separate at-grade crossings throughout the county. The CAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item.
The Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019 meeting. Discussion was had on the following: 1) Coordinate projects as best as possible to be cost effect and cause as minimal disruption as possible; 2) Update on increased Caltrain service to south county; 3) Request VTA to adopt a policy to separate all at-grade crossings; 4) The criteria development and scoring process for the Bicycle/Pedestrian Capital Projects Competitive Grant Program; and 5) Doubling the Bicycle/Pedestrian allocations for the early years. The BPAC, with three no-votes, recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item, with an amendment to emphasize funding for the Education & Encouragement sub-category of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Category.
The Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) heard this item at their March 14, 2019 meeting. Discussion was had on the following: 1) Why 2016 Measure B funds were being used on
Page 6 of 7 6
Caltrain locomotive overhauls; 2) Schedule for increased Caltrain service to south county; 3) Clarification that the Local Streets & Roads formula would not change; 4) Request that language in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category discussion state that funds allocated for FY20/FY21 be available for all three eligible cities. Staff clarified to the committee that the Board of Directors approved the allocation of 2016 Measure B funds in 2018 for the Caltrain locomotive overhaul project. Staff will provide the schedule for increased Caltrain service to south county to the PAC. PAC also requested a roadmap of 2016 Measure B funds, with expected expenditures and funding models for each program categories, for future years. The PAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item with the following amendments: 1) Provide a roadmap of 2016 Measure B funds 2) Clarify the Caltrain Grade Separation program category discussion to state that funds allocated for FY20/FY21 are available for all three eligible cities; and 3) Express the strongest opposition to using $4.3 million of 2016 Measure B funds for the Caltrain Locomotive Overhaul project.
STANDING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION: The Congestion Management Programming & Planning (CMPP) Committee heard this item at their March 21, 2019 meeting. Discussion was had on the status and schedule of the five SR 85 Noise Abatement pilot projects. A member requested that the Highway Interchange Program Category be revised to reflect a project in their jurisdiction. Staff stated that the Highway Interchange Program Category would be revised for the Board of Directors meeting, as there are currently moving parts to address. The CMPP unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item, with the understanding that the Highway Interchange Program Category be revised.
Prepared by: Jane Shinn Memo No. 6894
ATTACHMENTS: • MT6894_AttachmentA_Proposed_FY20FY21_HwyProjects (PDF)
Page 7 of 7 6.a Proposed 2016 Measure B (MB) Highway Interchanges Program FY20 and FY21 Projects and Allocation
ATTACHMENT A: DETAILED 2016 MEASURE B HIGHWAY PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST
Total Project MB MB Cost ($M) Implementing FY 18-21 ID Route Project Title Jurisdiction FY 18 - FY 19 FY 20 - FY 21 Agency Total Appropriation Request A SR 17 Southbound/Hamilton Ave. Off-Ramp A17Widening $2.0 Campbell Campbell $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000
SR 17/San Tomas Expressway Interim B17Improvements $1.0 Campbell Campbell $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000
Hwy. Transportation Operations System/Freeway CAllPerformance Initiative Phase 1 & 2 $54.0 Countywide VTA $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000
Noise Abatement Program (Countywide) DAll $50.0 Countywide VTA $4.0000 $0.0000 $4.0000
I-280/Wolfe Rd. Interchange Improvements E 280 $86.0 Cupertino VTA $6.0000 $1.5000 $7.5000
I-280 Northbound: Second Exit Lane to Foothill Cupertino, F 280 Expressway $4.2 VTA $3.5000 $0.0000 $3.5000 Los Altos Highway 17 Corridor Congestion Relief including G17SR 17/SR 9 interchange $50.0 Los Gatos VTA $0.0000 $5.4000 $5.4000 US 101/SR 25 Interchange (ENV/PS&E) H 152 $65.0 Gilroy VTA $2.0000 $8.0000 $10.0000
US 101/Buena Vista Ave. Interchange Improvements I 101 $35.0 Gilroy VTA $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000
Calaveras Boulevard Widening - Near-term J 237 improvements $2.0 Milpitas VTA $1.0000 $0.8000 $1.8000
SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield Road K 237 $50.0 Mt View VTA $0.0000 $4.0000 $4.0000
US 101 Interchanges Improvements: San Antonio Palo Alto, Mt L 101 Rd. to Charleston Rd./Rengstorff Ave. $35.0 VTA $1.0000 $1.0000 $2.0000 View US 101 Southbound/Trimble Rd./De La Cruz M 101 Blvd./Central Expwy. Interchange Improvements $60.0 San Jose VTA $4.0000 $35.0000 $39.0000
Double Lane Southbound US 101 off-ramp to N 101 Southbound SR 87 $3.0 San Jose VTA $1.5000 $1.0000 $2.5000
US 101/Mabury Rd./Taylor St. Interchange O 101 Construction $95.0 San Jose San Jose $2.0000 $0.0000 $2.0000
I-280/Winchester Blvd. Interchange Improvements P 280 $90.0 San Jose VTA $3.0000 $6.0000 $9.0000
SR 87 Technology-based Corridor Improvements - Q87(SB 87 Charcot On-ramp HOV Bypass) $3.0 San Jose VTA $1.0000 $1.7000 $2.7000
US 101/Zanker Rd./Skyport Dr./Fourth St. R 101 Interchange Improvements $162.0 San Jose VTA $3.0000 $6.0000 $9.0000
US 101/Old Oakland Rd. Interchange Improvements S 101 $25.0 San Jose San Jose $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000
US 101/Blossom Hill Rd. Interchange Improvements T 101 $32.0 San Jose San Jose $4.0000 $24.1000 $28.1000
Charcot Overcrossing U 880 $50.0 San Jose San Jose $12.0000 $25.0000 $37.0000
SR 237/Mathilda Ave. and US 101/Mathilda Ave. V 237 Interchange Improvement + follow-up Landscaping $47.0 Sunnyvale VTA $34.0000 $0.0000 $34.0000
Highway Program Management/Oversight VTA $0.0000 $0.4000 $0.4000
Totals $87.0000 $119.9000 $206.90
N:\ProgrammingAndGrants\2016 Measure B\Administrative\FY20FY21_Budget\Copy of Copy of Hwy_Project_List_2016_Envision Sales Tax Measure 2 year budget_Local Contribution_2020‐2021 ver8 Page 1 Item #6
FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Funding Proposal Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 2016 Measure B Program Overview
• Nine Program Categories
• Collection begins April 1, 2017
• January 30, 2019 – Validity of the Measure is upheld
• FY18/FY19 funds available now
2 Adopted FY18/FY19 2016 Measure B Program
• Local Streets & Roads - $90 million • BART Phase II - $0 • Bicycle & Pedestrian - $16.7 million • Caltrain Grade Separation - $7 million • Caltrain Corridor Capacity Impvts - $6.3 mil • Highway Interchanges - $87 million • County Expressways - $50 million • SR 85 Corridor - $12 million • Transit Operations - $33.3 million • Administrative Costs - $6.6 million
3 Adopted ($ millions) Proposed ($ millions) TOTAL Program Category FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 ($ millions) Administrative Costs $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 $13.2 Local Streets & Roads $50.0 $40.0 $40.0 $40.0 $170.0 Transit Operations Enhance Core Network $12.0 $12.0 $12.0 $12.0 $48.0 Innovative Transit Models $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $6.0 Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $10.0 Improve Amenities $1.3 $1.3 $2.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Education/Encouragement $2.5 $1.25 $1.25 $5.0 Capital Projects $13.33 $13.33 $26.66 Planning Projects $0.83 $0.83 $1.66 BART Phase II $0.0 $150.0 $150.0 Caltrain Grade Separations $7.0 $31.0 $38.0 Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements $6.3 $2.5 $8.8 SR 85 Corridor $12.0 $2.5 $14.5 County Expressways $50.0 $0.0 $50.0 Highway Interchanges $87.0 $119.9 $206.9 Total $308.86 $442.46 $751.32 Proposed FY20/FY21 Local Streets & Roads Program
• FY20 - $40 million • FY21 - $40 million
• FY18 - $50 million • FY19 - $40 million
5 Proposed FY20/FY21 BART Phase II Program
• FY20/FY21 - $150 million • FY18/FY19 - $0
6 Proposed FY20/FY21 Bicycle & Pedestrian Program
• Three sub-categories: ∙ Education & Encouragement - Formula ∙ Capital projects - Competitive ∙ Planning projects - Competitive
• FY20 - $8.3 million • FY21 - $8.3 million
• FY18 - $8.3 million • FY19 - $8.3 million
7 Proposed FY20/FY21 Caltrain Grade Separation Program • FY20/FY21 - $31 million • FY18/FY19 - $7 million
• Implementation Plan - moving forward • Funds to advance project activities
8 Proposed FY20/FY21 Caltrain Corridor Capacity Program • FY20/FY21 - $2.5 million • FY18/FY19 - $6.3 million
• Funding for San Jose Diridon Station Plan • Caltrain Locomotive Overhaul
9 Proposed FY20/FY21 Highway Interchanges Program
• FY20/FY21 - $119.9 million • FY18/FY19 - $87 million
• Most projects in early development stages • Includes VTA and City-delivered projects • Noise Abatement Program
• Increase of $5.3 million from February
10 Proposed FY20/FY21 County Expressways Program
• FY20/FY21 - $0 million • FY18/FY19 - $50 million
• County developing prioritization plan
11 Proposed FY20/FY21 SR85 Corridor Program
• FY20/FY21 - $2.5 million • FY18/FY19 - $12 million
• Initial planning & feasibility analysis for results of Transit Guideway Study • Transit Guideway Study • Five noise abatement pilot projects
12 Proposed FY20/FY21 Transit Operations Budget
• Four sub-categories ∙ Enhance Core Network - VTA ∙ Innovative Transit Models - Competitive ∙ Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares - VTA ∙ Improve amenities - VTA
• FY20 - $16.6 million • FY21 - $16.6 million
• FY18 - $16.6 million • FY19 - $16.6 million
13 Questions?
14 7
Date: March 25, 2019 Current Meeting: March 28, 2019 Board Meeting: N/A
BOARD MEMORANDUM
TO: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee
THROUGH: General Manager, Nuria I. Fernandez
FROM: Chief Planning and Engineering Officer, Carolyn M. Gonot
SUBJECT: Policy Direction on Remaining 2000 Measure A Projects to Ensure Alignment of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget with Board Priorities
Policy-Related Action: Yes Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No
ACTION ITEM
RECOMMENDATION:
Reaffirm previous or provide new policy direction on the following remaining 2000 Measure A projects to ensure that the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of Directors' priorities: (A) Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover; (B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track; and (C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension.
BACKGROUND:
In November 2000, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A, a 30-year half cent sales tax devoted to specified public transit capital improvement projects and operations. The Measure A ballot listed 14 specific projects or project areas.
The VTA Board of Directors is responsible for implementation of the 2000 Measure A Program and for all policy-related decisions including the composition, implementation schedule and funding level of projects.
Collection of the 2000 Measure A sales tax began on April 1, 2006 and will continue for 30 years until March 2036. The original estimate of total revenue at the time of the ballot was approximately $14 billion. Due to two economic recessions and a revised, more conservative revenue estimate, the current total revenue estimate for the 30-year tax is now approximately
7
$7.4 billion. Due to the significantly decreased total revenue projection, the VTA Board of Directors has made a series of policy decisions to prioritize projects for investment, development and delivery. Additional policy decisions will be necessary over the Measure’s remaining lifespan.
The Board of Directors has twice (September 2000 and August 2007) designated the Capital Expressway Light Rail Extension to Eastridge Mall project as VTA’s next highest priority following the BART Silicon Valley Extension.
Since 2000 Measure A passage over 18 years ago, several major factors have changed that may affect the Board’s policy decision on how remaining 2000 Measure A projects are delivered. Examples of these many significant factors include, but are not limited to: changes in demographics and ridership; local land use changes; environmental factors; technological advances such as autonomous vehicles; project funding opportunities and challenges; ride sharing (Uber and Lyft) and bike sharing; and emerging innovative transportation solutions.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this item is twofold: (1) provide the CPC and Board with information on the current status and factors affecting delivery of three of the remaining Measure projects; and (2) CPC provides policy direction, as needed, to ensure that 2000 Measure A projects in the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget align with the Board of Directors’ priorities. The three specific projects that will be reviewed in detail in the following are:
(A) San Jose Mineta Airport People Mover (B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track; and (C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension
(A) San Jose Mineta Airport People Mover (APM) Project Description The 2000 Measure A Ballot language mentions an airport people mover in two separate projects. The first is part of the BART project language (italics and bold added).
“Extend BART from Fremont through Milpitas to Downtown San Jose and the Santa Clara Caltrain Station, specifically, To build a BART Extension from Fremont to Milpitas, San Jose and Santa Clara with a major connection to the Tasman Light Rail line at the Milpitas BART Station. In San Jose to include a BART subway section with stations at San Jose State University, the new San Jose City Hall, Downtown San Jose at Market Street, San Jose Arena and the Diridon Multimodal Station connecting to Caltrain, ACE, Amtrak, the Vasona Light Rail line and VTA bus service. In Santa Clara, to serve Santa Clara University, and the Caltrain Station with a people mover connection to San Jose International Airport.”
Page 2 of 9 7
The second project is described as follows. “Provide Connections from San Jose International Airport to BART, Caltrain and the VTA Light Rail, specifically, to build a people mover rail line connecting the airport passenger terminals directly with BART, Caltrain and the VTA Light Rail line.”
Status Since passage of Measure A, the airport people mover has been studied three times. All have been led by the City of San Jose and the first two studies were funded through Measure A. The first study in 2000/2001 was performed by Lea & Elliot and looked at traditional people mover technology to connect the Metro/Airport Light Rail Station to the airport with additional circulation within the airport. The second study completed by ARUP in 2012 expanded the prior work scope to include a connection to the Santa Clara BART Station. The study also included extensive review of advanced technologies, including pod cars, by the NASA Aerospace Group. The last study completed by ARUP for the City of San Jose was done to review alignments from Diridon Station to the airport and consider the potential new markets from high speed rail. As a next step, VTA had planned to develop a Business Plan for an airport people mover. This plan would mainly focus on a review of previous alignments, ridership and technologies along with the capital and operating costs and potential funding and financing mechanisms. The Business Plan would provide the foundational information for the VTA Board to determine the most appropriate next steps.
Factors Affecting Project At this point, the development of the Business Plan is on hold for a few primary reasons: 1. City of San Jose staff, upon request of Mayor Liccardo (see Attachment A), is developing a Request for Information (RFI) to explore the viability of a public- private partnership with a private company for a Diridon to airport connection via tunnel or viaduct. VTA staff is cooperating with the City on the development of the RFI to be issued this spring. Results of the RFI are expected in late 2019. 2. Development of the Diridon Intermodal Station Concept Plan also includes space for a potential airport connector from Diridon. While no technical work on the connector itself is included in the Concept Plan, conclusions made in this process may provide input to the next phases of study for an airport connector. 3. VTA legal staff needs to review the original Measure A language that was quite specific regarding location and technology (“people mover rail line”) to ensure the eligibility of the Measure A funds for potential options.
It should be noted that a total of $5 million of Measure A funds have been allocated to the APM project in previous budgets. A total of $2 million has been expended in the past studies, leaving $3 million remaining for future work.
Page 3 of 9 7
Recommendation (A1) Staff recommends that development of the Business Plan stay on hold until the City’s RFI process is completed later this year and the results evaluated. VTA staff will continue to be an active participant in this process and will keep the VTA Board informed throughout the year on the progress.
Alternatives (A2) The Board could direct staff to start the Business Plan process now. This would likely require the issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to obtain an experienced consultant to develop the Business Plan.
(B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track Project Description The current project scope has discreet elements related to extending the line and improving the existing infrastructure. The Green Line (aka Winchester) extension would add a 1.5 mile extension to the Vasona Junction Station (transit center and parking) in Los Gatos (Winchester Boulevard at SR 85) and a Hacienda Station with parking in Campbell. There is also the potential for an in-fill station at West San Carlos.
The scope includes conceptual engineering for improving the existing infrastructure to include fully double tracking the corridor, expanding platforms to accommodate three-car trains, and parking expansion at the full Winchester Station lot.
As background, due to funding limitations when Vasona LRT was originally built, some segments of the line were built as single-track, some station platforms were limited in length to handle only two-car trains, and the park-and-ride lot at Winchester Station was undersized.
Page 4 of 9 7
In March 2014, the VTA Board of Directors approved a State and Federal environmental document for portions of the next phases Vasona LRT improvements. This environmental document included a double track extension to a new Vasona Junction Station and park- and-ride, relocating the freight tracks, expanding the Winchester park-and-ride, two substations, a new Hacienda Station and park-and-ride, and extending existing stations for three-car trains.
Status • In May 2018, VTA entered into a contract with Kimley Horn in an amount of $1.03 million to perform additional feasibility studies to be completed by June 2019. The studies cover the extension to Vasona Junction, platform extensions, double tracking the single tracked segments, and the feasibility of temporal separation with the adjacent freight rail tracks.
Factors Affecting Project • The ridership estimate for extending the Green Line by two stations (Hacienda and Vasona Junction) results in 717 total new boardings in 2035. The two new stations would account for 1,643 boardings, but the Winchester Station (the current end of the line) would lose 926 passengers as these riders shift to the new stations. (Vasona Corridor Final Supplemental EIR January 2014) • This project has a current Measure A budget allocation of $40 million. This amount was planned to be used for the aforementioned feasibility studies, the start of final design if the Board decided to move forward with this project, and right-of-way procurement as necessary. VTA did attempt to purchase the nursery adjacent to the full Winchester Station park & ride but were out bid. • Land use development along the proposed extension necessary to support light rail service has not advanced. For example, the Campbell City Council did not approve the Dell Avenue Area Plan, which would have created a large mixed use residential and tech office area with the Hacienda Station as a major hub. • The Green Line (Vasona Corridor) is directly affected by the Diridon Intermodal Station Concept Plan now underway. The studies in the Concept Plan include possible new alignments for the Green line on how it approaches and travels through the Diridon Station. The potential changes for the Green Line in the Diridon Station area could impact the existing line operations and infrastructure. • The estimated design and construction cost for all improvements to the Green Line (Vasona Corridor) is estimated to be $401 million. This includes the following elements, some of which could be advanced separately. Platform Extensions $48 million Constrained Double Tracking $39 million Race to Fruitdale Bridges/Double Track $27 million Hamilton Station Double Tracking $52 million San Carlos Double Tracking $31 million West San Carlos Station $13 million Total to Improve Current Line $210 million
Page 5 of 9 7
Extension to Vasona $87 million Hacienda Station $23 million Hacienda Park and Ride $17 million End of Line Pocket Track $14 million Vasona Park and Ride $50 million Total to Complete Extension $191 million
More detail on the current feasibility studies will be available and presented to the VTA Board in June 2019 as the final documentation and report is now being developed. Specific recommendation will be made at that time, but staff suggests the preliminary options that follow. Recommendation (B1) Staff recommends placing this project on hold until development of the Diridon Intermodal Station Concept Plan is complete, a single preferred option is selected, and the future impact on the Vasona Corridor can be assessed. The selection of a Single Preferred Option should occur this fall. Alternatives (B2) The Board could advance one or more elements of the infrastructure improvements. These will be presented in the Feasibility Study Final report.
(C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension (EBRC) Project Description The Eastridge to BART Regional Connector (EBRC) is part of the Downtown East Valley Improvements (DTEV) in East San Jose. This project has been a Board identified priority since before Measure A was approved and continues to receive Board support with a series of board action that are identified subsequently in this memo. The EBRC was formerly called Capitol Expressway Light Rail (CELR) Project.
Page 6 of 9 7
Previous project highlights include: • August 2000 - Planning work began with the Preferred Investment Strategy for the Downtown East Valley Study Area that included three primary components, one of which was, “Light rail transit along the entire length of the Capitol Expressway.” This strategy was the result of the Downtown East Valley Major Investment Study. • September 2000 - VTA Board adopts Resolution No. 00.09.58 designating the Downtown/East Valley Transit Improvement Program as VTA’s next priority after the 1996 Measure A+B Transportation Improvement projects. • November 2000 - Voters approve 2000 Measure A Program that includes a project for “light rail from downtown San Jose to the East Valley.” • May 2005 - Original environmental document approved, with updates and changes in August 2007, June 2010 and March 2014. • August 2007 - VTA Board reaffirms the Board support for the Capitol Expressway Light Rail Extension to Eastridge Mall and the continuation of planning and design activities in coordination with the review and approval of the Measure A Expenditure Plan. • June 2010 - VTA approves environmental document addendum (State CEQA Revised Addendum to the SEIR) for the phasing of the Pedestrian & Bus improvements as Phase 1. Phase 1 complete with the opening of the transit center in Spring 2015. • June 2016 - VTA Board appropriates an additional $50 million of Measure A funds to complete design, acquire right-of-way and relocate utilities. The scope included light rail in the median and aerial at Story and at-grade at Ocala and Cunningham intersections. • October 2016 - Board approves an additional $177 million in Measure A funds to the project. • May 2018 - Board approves staff recommendation to perform environmental analysis of the light rail geometry change to full aerial alignment. The new alignment needs increased funding of $76 million for construction. • October 2018 - Draft Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was made available and circulated for public comment. • When referring to the total Measure A cost, several projects are included in the DTEV line item, with the following breakdown: Project Cost Status Conceptual DTEV Overall (P0375) $11M Closed Original (P0476) $56M Closed Phase 1A pedestrian improvement (P0743) $19M Closed Phase 1B bus improvement (P0744) $60M Closed Phase 2 EBRC light rail (P0787)* $453M Underway Total project cost for DTEV $599M
* $299M Board authorized to date with $11M spent to date
Page 7 of 9 7
• Operations and Maintenance Cost: $2M to $3M per year
Project Improvements • 2.4 mile Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Alum Rock Station to Eastridge Transit Center • LRT in median of Capitol Expressway from Capitol Avenue to south of Cunningham Avenue; side running over Tully Road to Eastridge Transit Center • Elevated station at Story Road and at-grade station at Eastridge (Ocala Station eliminated in previous environmental document update) • Grade separation at Story Road, Ocala Avenue, Cunningham Avenue and Tully Road • LRT requires removal of two High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes between Story Road and Tully Road • Ridership estimate for new daily boardings (bus and rail) ➢ Year 2023: 1,235 for Light Rail and 940 Total ➢ Year 2043: 2,212 Light Rail and 1,316 Total
Current Project Schedule • Certify the Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in June 2019 • Begin property acquisition in July 2019 • Begin to enter into utility relocation agreements in July 2019 • Begin utility relocation for locations not requiring property acquisition (median water line) in fall 2019 • Complete engineering at end of 2019 • Complete property acquisition for utility relocation May 2020 • Begin utility relocation at locations requiring property acquisition in June 2020 • Complete acquisition for light rail construction in October 2021 • Advertise light rail construction in early 2021 with award in summer 2021 • Complete construction in 2025
Factors Affecting Project • Environmental impacts o Permanent traffic o Temporary traffic during construction o Noise and vibration during construction o Vibration during operations o Air quality during construction
Page 8 of 9 7
• Schedule risk for utility relocation • Schedule risk for property acquisition (especially Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approval) • Coordination and integration with potential closing and development of Reid Hillview Airport (airport projected to close in 2032)
Recommendation (C1) Continue implementing the current Board policy direction of completing all activities currently planned for environmental clearance, and if the Board certifies the second supplemental environmental impact report, then proceed with property acquisition, utility relocation and engineering.
Alternatives (C2) The Board could direct staff to present the second supplemental environmental impact report for its consideration and defer other items until completion of a proposed transit system technology / innovation study (i.e., consider vehicle technology) and further direction by the CPC/Board. Items to defer may include one or more of the following options: a. Engineering (includes bridge design); b. Engineering, property acquisition and utility relocation; c. Property acquisition and utility relocation; and d. Utility relocation. Next Steps Any change to existing policy direction on the three projects provided by the CPC will be incorporated to ensure the FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of Directors’ priorities.
Following the Capital Program Committee’s March action, the Proposed Capital Budget will be combined with the Proposed Operating Budget to form the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget that will be presented at the Board of Directors’ April Workshop. The Board will then consider adoption of the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget at its June 6, 2019 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of any of the recommended actions. However, should the CPC request a change to any of the projects, those would be incorporated into the FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget to ensure it aligns with the Board of Directors’ priorities.
Prepared by: Capital Program Team Memo No. 6945
ATTACHMENTS: • A--Memo from SJ Mayor Liccardo on Building SJ Central Station 2-4-19 (PDF)
Page 9 of 9 7.a
COUNCIL AGENDA: 2/5/2019 ITEM: 6.1
GTYOF ~ SANJOSE Memorandum CAl'rit\L OF SI LICON VALLEY
TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Mayor Sam Liccardo
SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: February 4, 2019
Approved
l --■l _ ■---IG A SAN JOSE CENTRAL STATION FOR THE FUTURE
RECOMMENDATION As part of a future study session on rail planning in San Jose, or a separate update to Council: 1. Present for discussion various technology and alignment options for connecting the San Jose International Airport to Diridon Station. The same discussion may or may not include other potential corridors to Diridon Station, depending on staffs readiness; 2. Assess the extent to which VT A can use 2000 Measure A funds, or other fund sources, to fund study, conceptual design, or preliminary design of transit connectors to the Airport, along San Carlos-Stevens Creek, or Monterey Road.
BACKGROUND The integration of multiple transit lines in our central station presents us with a complex and critically important set of tasks. Nobody wants to make this more complex or difficult, but if we're planning the region's Grand Central Station for the next century, we shouldn't do so wearing blinders to the future.
Several other transit connections are worth exploration, and we need to build a station with "room" to grow for additional portals to our region. As Bay Area regional leaders contemplate a regional transportation measure in the next four to six years, it would serve us well to get far along in a study and conceptual design, to ensure we'll be ready for a larger funding push in the near future. I do not desire to distract us from the very important work we have before us, but I want to ensure that we're not ignoring the importance of continuing to think big.
A. The Long-Sought Airport Connector For two consecutive years, the Mineta San Jose International Airport has been the fastest growing airport in the United States. City and regional leaders have long sought a means of connecting the Airport to the rest of our emerging transit system, and such a proposal comprised a key part of the 2000 Measure A, a countywide sales tax approved by more than 70 percent of the voters. In 2000, I left my job as an attorney to work on the measure as a communications coordinator on Measure A, and I recall polling showing that its "people mover rail line 7.a
COUNCIL AGENDA February 4, 20 I 9 Subject: Building A San Jose Central Station For The Future Page 2 of3 connecting the airport passenger terminals directly with BART, Caltrain, and the VTA Light Rail line" rose near the top of voter surveys about the various Measure A component projects. An Airport connector to Diridon could serve another important priority as well: identifying opportunities for parking to serve the Arena and the rest of the emerging "Grand Central Station." Parking has become a bone of contention with our longstanding Arena partners, the San Jose Sharks, and we need to find long-term solutions that do not require tens of millions of wasteful expenditures on parking infrastructure that will likely become obsolete within a decade. The Airport has a large supply of parking, the demand for which will decline with the continued emergence ofride sharing and autonomy. Over time, the Airport could become a "car port" for those needing to hop on a High-Speed Rail train or attend a concert, with a rapid, futuristic ride to the Arena's front door.
Since the passage of Measure A in 2000, the City, VTA, and various partners have analyzed multiple options for a transit connection to the airport, ranging from standard rail to futuristic personal rapid transit (PRT) concepts. Although plans from the ballot measure generally contemplated connections to the Santa Clara BART or to North First Street Light Rail stations, the cost for standard rail seemed excessive- some $800 million, according to an estimate a half decade ago-and PRT appeared ill-suited to a corridor with relatively light projected ridership.
In the last eighteen months, I began-and DOT has continued-communications with senior officials at the Boring Company, Elon Musk' s tunnel-construction firm, about the possibility of boring a 2-mile tunnel between the Airport and the Diridon Station area. From those conversations, the possibility of a private-public partnership has emerged that could dramatically reduce the cost of tunnel construction, with some modification of transitional transit models. The Boring Company, as many know, is currently testing the use of individual automotive vehicles (modified Teslas, of course) along a flat surface in a tunnel in Southern California.
We could explore, through a public Request for Information (RFI), the viability of a public private partnership with Boring or other private competitors for such a connection, by tunnel or viaduct. Such an RFI should explicitly mention the need to abide by longstanding City policies, such as prevailing wage. Because non-rail transit allows for greater flexibility of design and construction, we might explore options that would not penetrate the already-complex maze of transit alignments through Diridon, such as a portal at Arena Green, with a subsequent connection into the core of the central station.
As part of a future study session on the Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan, or through a separate update to Council, City and VT A staff should return with potential options for connecting the Airport to Diridon Station. We should also flesh out the extent to which such a connection to Diridon would be eligible for 2000 Measure A funding (with a legal analysis of whether the ballot measure is restricted to as to the precise location of the line), and the extent to which Airport user fees might fund some portion of the extension.
B. The West San Carlos-Stevens Creek Corridor An even more complex-but equally vital- undertaking would connect Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San Jose along the San Carlos-Stevens Creek corridor. This corridor could link major health, 7.a
COUNCIL AGENDA February 4, 2019 Subject: Building A San Jose Central Station For The Future Page 3 of3 • education, employment, retail, and housing destinations in our region, including De Anza College, Main Street Cupertino, Vallco, Valley Fair and Santana Row, the Apple headquarters, and three San Jose Urban Villages, and with a short detour, Valley Medical Center.
Measure A in 2000 also committed funding to the study, design, and construction of light rail options throughout the region, including corridors along Capitol Expressway, El Camino Real, Vasona, and Stevens Creek. Again, it would be helpful to know whether there is any flexibility in the programmatic allocation of that funding to study and perform preliminary design of different transit modes along the same corridor.
C. Future Portals: to Monterey Road and Beyond While there is no regional plan or funding source for a transit line along our Monterey Road corridor, a very preliminary conceptual study of a bus-rapid-transit line has been contemplated. A committee headed by Councilmembers Jimenez and Esparza will be exploring some conceptual options as part of a series of other critical issues facing residents and businesses along that corridor. VTA has also begun a countywide High-Capacity Transit Study to identify the places where demand for this service exists and what kinds of transit technologies would be most appropriate to serve them. DOT and VTA staff may identify other critical corridors for study or preliminary analysis, particularly as we contemplate a potential regional funding source for new transit development.
Recognizing that funding and planning is many years off, we should acknowledge, through explicit Station design, the desire for scalability to enable new portals to the transit center as concepts evolve and funding emerges. I particularly appreciate VTA's role in setting a comprehensive vision and action plan for our region and ask that VTA leadership and staff continue to work with the City to rapidly advance work on regional transit, particularly these critical connections. I thank the City, VTA, and other partner agency staff for their willingness to consider these options amid all that they're juggling today, and I look forward to undertaking this exciting exploration with our Council and our community. Item #7
Policy Direction on Remaining 2000 Measure A Projects
Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019 Remaining 2000 Measure A Projects
(A) Airport People Mover (APM)
(B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track
(C) Capital Expressway Light Rail (CELR) Extension, Phase II – Eastridge to BART Regional Connector (EBRC)
2 Airport People Mover Previous Studies Overview 2000-2001: Measure A funded - City of San Jose (CSJ) lead, Lea and Elliott prime consultant 2012: Measure A funded - CSJ lead, 1) ARUP Prime; 2) NASA Report on Automated Transit Network (status of new technology) 2016: CSJ lead and funded, Diridon connection
VTA Measure A Budget Total $5 million $2 million expended on first two studies, $3 million remaining
4 APM - Original Alignment 2001 Study – CSJ Lead Future BART/ Caltrain Original concept to connect Station Metro Light Rail Station with SJC and also use APM as an internal airport circulator.
Existing Centralized Terminal A Terminal Legend Phase 1 Short Term Parking/Rental Phase 2 Car Garage Phase 3 (Option A) Phase 3 (Option B) VTA LRT Future APM/ LRT Caltrain Station 5 6 7 ATN Alignment
2012 Studies – CSJ Lead Automated Transit Network (ATN) Metro LRT to airport (SJC) terminals and parking garages (Phase 1), then to BART Santa Clara (Phase 2) Capital: $747M to $1.2B Operating: +$9M to -$6M Uncertainties regarding new technologies
8 ATN Concept at SJC Terminal
9 ATN Concept at SJC Terminal
10 APM to Diridon 2016 San Jose Study Study new alignment to connect Diridon to SJC Expanded market by including HSR connectivity “Base” alignment does not include Santa Clara BART Capital: $380M to $830M No operating costs estimates
11 Recommendation
Business Plan stay on hold pending completion of City of San Jose Request for Interest in “APM” to Diridon and connection from downtown San Jose along Stevens Creek to Cupertino
12 Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track Scope
• Review 1.5 mile extension to the Vasona Junction Station (transit center and parking) in Los Gatos and a Hacienda station with parking in Campbell. • Conceptual engineering for improving the existing infrastructure: fully double tracking the corridor plus temporal separation operation with existing freight expanding platforms to accommodate three-car trains parking expansion at the full Winchester Station lot
14 Budget and Status
• Measure A budget allocation of $43 million • May 2018 - VTA contracted with Kimley Horn for $1.03 million • Final study results to VTA Board in June 2019
15 Project Scope Current Line Improvements Estimated Design/PM/ROW/Construction Cost Platform Extensions $48M Double Tracking without structural impact $39M Double track Race to Fruitdale $27M Hamilton Double Tracking $52M San Carlos Double Tracking $31M San Carlos Station (proposed) $13M
Total: $212M
Existing Single-Track Operations Length: 12,000 feet Time in Single Track: 5 min 29 sec Vasona Junction Extension Estimated Design/PM/ROW/Construction Cost
Base $87M Hacienda Station $23M Hacienda PNR $17M 600’ Pocket Track $14M Vasona Junction Station $50M
Total: $191M
• Previous Project cost estimate was $176 Million (Vasona EIR 2014) • Ridership estimates (Vasona EIR 2014) 2,900 (700 new boardings) Recommendation
Place project on hold until development of the Diridon Intermodal Station Concept Plan is complete, a single preferred option is selected, and the future impact on the Vasona Corridor can be assessed.
Selection of a Single Preferred Option should occur this Fall.
19 Capitol Expressway Light Rail Extension – Phase II (EBRC) Project Overview
• Project Description • Project History • Issues • Next Steps
21 Project Description
EBRC is Phase II of Capital Expressway Light Rail Extension • 2.4 mile double track LRT from Alum Rock Station to Eastridge Transit Center • LRT in median of Capitol Expressway from Capitol Avenue through Cunningham Avenue; side running through Tully Road to Eastridge • Elevated station at Story Road and at grade station at Eastridge • Grade separation at Story Rd., Ocala Ave., Cunningham Ave., and Tully Rd. • LRT uses median and requires removal of HOV lane between Story Road and Tully Road
22 Photo Simulation – Before and After
Prior to Project After Project
23 Project History 2000 2000 Board adopts resolution Voters approve Measure A with prioritizing Downtown/East “Light rail from downtown San Valley transit improvement Jose to East Valley.”
2005 2007 Board certifies environmental Board reaffirms support for document; updates in 2007, Capitol Expressway Light Rail 2010 and 2014 Extension
2016 2018 Board approves $50M and Board directs analysis of $177M funding commitments impacts for light rail geometry from Measure A change; approves funding strategy 24 Phased Approach
Phase 1 Construction complete • Pedestrian and Bus Improvements Sidewalk, pedestrian lighting and landscape Bus stops at Story Road and Ocala Avenue New transit center at Eastridge
Phase 2 Underway • Light rail extension to Eastridge
25 Pedestrian and Bus Improvements
26 Project Challenges
• Traffic impact from lane removal • Right of way constraints • Utility conflicts • Construction impacts o Temporary traffic o Noise o Vibration
27 Traffic Impacts Carpool Lanes
• Two lanes will be removed between Story Road and Tully Road • The Evergreen Specific Plan approved the carpool lanes as a temporary measure until light rail project was built • Permanent traffic impacts with increased delay no less than 2.5 minutes from Quimby to Capitol Avenue
Existing Eight lanes on Capitol Expressway
28 Right of Way Constraint
9 Proposed Alignment Change
Revise profile to Aerial LRT
CunninghamAve
StoryRd
Ocala Ave Ocala
Tully Rd Tully Capitol Ave Capitol
LRT Station
30 Photo Simulation
Side running alignment at Capitol Expressway and Tully Road
Median to side running transition near Tully Road
31 Utility Conflicts
• Conflicts with electrical transmission towers with light rail • Water line conflicts in median • Gas, electrical and communications relocations at Story Road. • Property acquisition required for most utility relocation
32 Transmission Tower Relocations
Before After
33 Construction
34 Construction
varies 10’ 5’ varies construction construction vehicle access walk access
traffic traffic
Southbound direction Northbound direction
35 Cost
Total Measure A Project cost included in the DTEV line item has the following breakdown: Project: DTEV Cost Status Conceptual DTEV Overall $11M Closed Original CELR $56M Closed Phase 1A - pedestrian improvement $19M Closed Phase 1B - bus and Eastridge Transit Center $60M Closed Phase 2 - EBRC light rail* $453M Underway Total project cost for DTEV $599M
* $386M Board approved with $12M spent to date
• Operations and Maintenance Cost: $2M - $3M per year
36 Budget and Ridership Budget: CELR – Phase 2 (EBRC) Original Recommended Estimated Total Cost of the Project $377M $453M Measure A commitment $247M $247M MTC Regional Measure 3 (RM3) (to be secured)* $130M $130M Senate Bill (SB1) formula Funds $ 9M Savings from other Measure A Projects $ 67M * RM3 funding currently under challenge
Ridership Estimate for increased daily boardings • Year 2023: 1,235 Light Rail 940 Total Bus and Light Rail • Year 2043: 2,212 Light Rail 1,316 Total Bus and Light Rail • Note: Total bus and light rail is less than light rail only because some existing bus riders will shift to light rail at the Alum Rock, Story and Eastridge locations.
37 Schedule Consider Certify EIR June 2019
Environmental
Begin property acquisition July 2019 Property Acquisition
Begin utility relocation July 2019 Utility Relocation
Bid Ready End 2019 Engineering Begin Construction Advertise August 2021 February 2021 Light Rail Construction
Decision point
38 Recommended Next Steps
• Per Board direction: o Update Environmental Document with project changes o Once certified, begin property acquisition and utility relocation o Continue with Engineering of construction documents • Alternatives: o Continue with environmental document and evaluation of system wide technology alternatives (rubber tire) and defer one or more of the following: . Engineering . Property acquisition . Utility relocation . Light Rail construction
39 8
Date: March 21, 2019 Current Meeting: March 28, 2019 Board Meeting: N/A
BOARD MEMORANDUM
TO: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Capital Program Committee
THROUGH: General Manager, Nuria I. Fernandez
FROM: Deputy GM/Chief Financial Officer, Raj Srinath
SUBJECT: Proposed Capital Budget for Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021
Policy-Related Action: Yes Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No
ACTION ITEM
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget. BACKGROUND:
Development of the FY 2020 and FY 2021 Capital Budget began with the call for projects in August 2018. Potential projects were identified through a variety of factors including transit asset management tools, regular asset inspections, completed strategic planning efforts, and specific needs assessments. The capital budget development process is comprised of numerous levels of review and evaluation with a goal to provide a thoroughly-considered proposal for Capital Program Committee (CPC) and Board consideration. The Proposed Capital Budget for Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021 was presented to the CPC at a workshop on February 28, 2019.
DISCUSSION:
There are a few minor changes to the project list presented at the February CPC workshop. These changes, listed below, are reflected in the FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2 packet (Attachment A). VTA Transit Fund • Project #67-FAST Program Implementation has been increased $2.844 million to reflect additional grant funding (Low Carbon Transit Operations Program-LCTOP Population-Based).
8
• The mix of grant funding was adjusted for the following three projects to reflect updated estimates from LCTOP Revenue-Based funds: o Project #4-Electric Bus Procurement o Project #9-Cerone Energy Storage System o Project #11-Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion
• LCTOP funding had previously been categorized as “Federal” instead of “State”. The project schedule on pages 2-5 and the impacted projects’ information have been corrected. The chart below shows the updated breakout of the FY 2020 and FY 2021 proposed projects by funding source. VTA Transit Fund Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Capital Budget by Funding Source
VTP Highway Program • One project, SR 87/Charcot On-Ramp Part-time Travel Lane Pilot Project (previously project #16), has been removed as it was determined to be a duplication of an existing project. A portion of the projects in the VTP Highways Program have been renumbered as a result of this change. As mentioned at the February workshop, the 105 VTA Transit Fund projects submitted for consideration were reviewed and rated based upon the project’s overall merit using an evaluation criteria scale. The projects were then ranked based on their overall score. The Committee requested information on the resulting ranking of the proposed projects. Attachment B shows the VTA Transit Fund proposed projects listed by their respective ranking in the initial, financially unconstrained review. Attachment C shows the same information sorted by the project numbers used in pages 2-41 of Attachment A.
Page 2 of 4 8
The Committee also requested information on the weighting of the criteria used in the initial, financially unconstrained review of VTA Transit Fund projects. The evaluation criteria (in alphabetical order) and their respective weights are as follows: • Enhances Safety & Security-0.06 • Environmental Sustainability-0.058 • Improves Cost Efficiency/Effectiveness-0.277 • Improves Transit System-0.109 • Increases Ridership-0.254 • Preserves/Maintains Transit System-0.242 The scoring systems allows projects that have a Safety, Security, or Environmental Sustainability component to receive “bonus points.” Subsequent project reviews provide an additional opportunity to ensure that Safety and Security are not compromised.
NEXT STEPS:
Following the Capital Program Committee’s March action, the Proposed Capital Budget will be combined with the Proposed Operating Budget forming the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget for presentation at the Board of Directors’ April Workshop with final adoption in June.
Key Upcoming Dates in Budget Development Process
April Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget presented at Board Workshop May Community Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget May Advisory Committee Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget June Board of Directors Adoption of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget
ALTERNATIVES:
The Capital Program Committee may choose to modify the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of this action. However, ultimate approval of the FY 2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget by the VTA Board of Directors will provide the appropriation, or legal authorization, to make expenditures and incur obligations.
Prepared by: Carol Lawson, Deputy Director of Finance, Budget & Program Management Memo No. 6942
ATTACHMENTS: • FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Budget Projects v2 Post Workshop Updates (PDF)
Page 3 of 4 8
• Proposed Projects by Ranking (PDF) • Ranking by Project # (PDF)
Page 4 of 4 8.a
Reflects updates since February 28, 2019 Workshop
FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2
CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE MEETING MARCH 28, 2019 8.a
SECTION 1
VTA Transit Fund
Page 1 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
(Dollars in Thousands)
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
VTA
2016 2016
Local
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure 1. Bus and LR Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500 2. Bus CCTV Replacement 2,640 0 0 0 660 3,300 3. Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles 1,805 0 0 0 451 2,256 4. Electric Bus Procurement 10,483 14,517 0 0 0 25,000 5. Paratransit Fleet Program FY20 3,978 0 0 0 995 4,973 Revenue Vehicles & Equipment Total 20,106 14,517 0 0 2,406 37,029 6. Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program 0 0 0 0 2,354 2,354 Non-Revenue Vehicles Total 0 0 0 0 2,354 2,354 7. Cerone Boiler Replacement 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 8. Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement 0 0 0 0 705 705 9. Cerone Energy Storage System 0 2,905 0 0 0 2,905 10. Chaboya Yard Well Removal 120 0 0 0 30 150 11. Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion 0 4,600 0 0 0 4,600 12. Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers 0 750 0 0 0 750 13. Facilities Equipment Replacement Project 0 0 0 0 1,219 1,219 14. Fuel Dispenser Replacement 1,920 0 0 0 480 2,400 15. Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project 1,000 0 0 0 250 1,250 16. Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements 2,400 0 0 0 600 3,000 17. Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement 800 0 0 0 200 1,000 18. HVAC Replacement Program FY20 1,448 0 0 0 362 1,810 19. LED Exterior Lighting Replacement 0 0 0 0 750 750 20. Painting Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,755 1,755
Page 2 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
VTA
2016 2016
Local
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure 21. Pavement Management Program FY14 0 0 0 0 1,121 1,121 22. Pavement Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,856 1,856 23. Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500 24. Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division 2,000 0 0 0 500 2,500 25. Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guad. 377 0 0 0 94 472 26. Roofing Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,365 1,365 27. Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building 0 0 0 0 560 560 Operating Facilities & Equipment Total 11,266 8,255 0 0 13,146 32,667 28. Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20 800 0 0 0 200 1,000 29. Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization 280 0 0 0 70 350 30. Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements 4,920 0 0 0 1,230 6,150 31. Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20 0 0 0 0 6,600 6,600 32. OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20 12,520 0 0 0 3,130 15,650 33. Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20 11,440 0 0 0 2,860 14,300 34. Track Intrusion Abatement FY20 4,000 0 0 0 1,000 5,000 35. Union Pacific Culvert Replacement 0 0 0 0 440 440 36. Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking 2,720 0 0 0 680 3,400 Light Rail Way, Power & Signal Total 36,680 0 0 0 16,210 52,890 37. ADA Upgrades at Facilities 2,560 0 0 0 640 3,200 38. Bus Stop Improvement Program 0 142 1,300 0 0 1,442 39. Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement 446 0 0 0 111 557 40. Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade 2,216 0 0 0 554 2,770 41. Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20 776 0 0 0 194 970 42. North San Jose Transportation Improvements 0 0 0 3,000 0 3,000
Page 3 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
VTA
2016 2016
Local
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure 43. Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings 6,560 0 0 0 1,640 8,200 44. Rehabilitation of LR System Elevators and Escalators 7,440 0 0 0 1,860 9,300 45. San Jose Diridon Station Plan 0 0 2,500 7,500 0 10,000 46. Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20 1,600 0 0 0 400 2,000 Passenger Facilities Total 21,598 142 3,800 10,500 5,399 41,439 47. Advanced Cyber Security 0 0 0 0 400 400 48. Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution 0 0 0 0 2,266 2,266 49. Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent 0 0 0 0 207 207 50. Disaster Recovery Cloud 0 0 0 0 500 500 51. Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators 0 0 0 0 500 500 52. GIS Program Development 0 0 0 0 802 802 53. Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500 54. Records Management Program 0 0 0 0 2,900 2,900 55. River Oaks Campus Network Cabling 0 0 0 0 1,400 1,400 56. SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 57. SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade 4,447 0 0 0 1,112 5,559 58. Server Refresh 0 0 0 0 800 800 59. Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model 0 0 0 680 280 960 60. Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool 130 0 0 250 0 380 61. VTA Gigabit Network Project 960 0 0 0 240 1,200 Information Systems & Technology Total 6,737 0 0 930 13,207 20,874 62. Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match 0 9,414 0 0 586 10,000 63. Capital Contingency 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 4,000 64. Community-Based Transportation Plans 300 0 0 0 0 300
Page 4 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
VTA
2016 2016
Local
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure 65. Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans 250 250 0 500 0 1,000 66. Facility and Fleet Plan 0 0 0 0 715 715 67. FAST Program Implementation 0 2,844 0 0 3,400 6,244 68. Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Stn Master Plan 0 0 0 750 0 750 69. South County Rail Study 0 0 750 0 0 750 70. SR 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering 0 0 2,365 0 0 2,365 71. VA Pilot Smart Shuttle 2,700 0 0 0 675 3,375 Miscellaneous Total 3,250 12,509 3,115 3,250 7,376 29,499 Grand Total 99,637 35,423 6,915 14,680 60,098 216,752
Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding.
Page 5 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
Revenue Vehicles & Equipment 2. Bus CCTV Replacement-$3.3 million 1. Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Project Scope Replacement-$1.5 million This project will replace approximately 333 CCTV systems on buses operating with end-of life Network Video recorders to ensure that Project Scope the CCTV systems on these buses continue to operate reliably until the buses are decommissioned to age and/or use This project will replace approximately 700 Mobile Routers used to . provide passenger Wi-Fi, live look-in CCTV, CAD/AVL and other Funding (in millions) technology system communication needs on Light Rail Vehicles and buses that are currently operating with end-of-life routers. Federal-5307 VTA Local Funding (in millions) $2.640 $0.660
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Federal-5337 VTA Local $1.200 $0.300 Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported Cost savings will be realized due to new product warranty, however • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit additional expenditures are expected as well due to increased Operating Budget Impact functionality. Overall a net zero increase/decrease is anticipated. Software license, support and warranty are expected to cost Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.3 million $270,000/year for all 700 units. Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020 Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.5 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020
Page 6 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
3. Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles- 4. Electric Bus Procurement-$25.0 million $2.256 million Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide funding required to purchase This project will install and deploy real-time security cameras on 200 an additional 25 electric buses. VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 State-LCTOP $10.483 $14.517 Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.805 $0.451 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Annual savings estimated at $5,000 per bus due to reduced The estimated annual operating impact is $313,840, which includes maintenance costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses. software maintenance and support; cellular service; and Estimated Total Project Cost-$40.5 million maintenance/support and software licenses. Anticipated Completion Date-September 2022 Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.256 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 7 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
5. Paratransit Fleet Program FY20-$4.973 million Non-Revenue Vehicles Project Scope 6. Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program- This project will procure 80 vehicles and associated equipment for $2.354 million provision of paratransit service to replace vehicles that have exceeded their useful life. Project Scope Funding (in millions) This project provides for the replacement of 46 non-revenue vehicles that have exceeded their useful life (average mileage of 146,000, average age—14 years). Retired vehicles are replaced with Federal-5307 VTA Local hybrid or electric vehicles whenever possible per VTA’s Sustainable $3.978 $0.995 Fleet Policy.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Funding (in millions)
Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit VTA Local $2.354 • Transportation System Management
Operating Budget Impact 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Estimated savings of $57,000 per year due to reduced maintenance Business Line(s) Supported costs for new vehicles. • Transportation System Management Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.973 million Operating Budget Impact Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Estimated savings of $125,000 per year due to less critical maintenance repairs of the aging fleet. Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.354 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 8 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
8. Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement-
Operating Facilities & Equipment $0.705 million 7. Cerone Boiler Replacement-$1.0 million Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed to remove and replace two existing 500kw liquid propane This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding gas generators with one 1200kw diesel generator. needed to remove and replace two existing 1978 York Shipley firetube boilers that have reached the end of their useful life. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local $0.705 VTA Local $1.000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported
Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Some savings anticipated due to reduced use of propane. Some savings anticipated due to reduced repair costs and fuel Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.165 million consumption. Anticipated Completion Date-March 2020 Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.166 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020
Page 9 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
9. Cerone Energy Storage System-$2.905 million 10. Chaboya Yard Well Removal-$0.15 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will deploy a commercial, advanced, high-capacity This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding energy storage system to allow charging of electric buses using the needed to obtain case closure and demolish the ground water stored energy when the electricity rate is at peak price or when remediation system and wells at the Chaboya Bus Yard. there are electrical outages. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 VTA Local State-LCTOP $0.120 $0.030 $2.905
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None Estimated annual savings of $15,000. Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.395 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.905 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 10 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
11. Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion- 12. Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for $4.6 million Bus Chargers-$0.75 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will fund electric bus chargers and infrastructure to This project will fund an expansion of electrical capacity at the expand the size, capacity, and efficiency of the current charging Cerone Bus Yard to support the deployment of additional electric station to support the deployment of up to 30 electric buses. buses. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
State-LCTOP State-LCTOP $4.600 $0.750
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs • Delivering Projects and Programs • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Fueling of buses with electricity instead of diesel is anticipated to Fueling of buses with electricity instead of diesel is anticipated to result in annual cost savings. In addition, savings on maintenance result in annual cost savings. In addition, savings on maintenance costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses are estimated costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses are estimated at $5,000 per year, per bus. at $5,000 per year, per bus. Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.6 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.75 million Anticipated Completion Date-September 2022 Anticipated Completion Date-November 2021
Page 11 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
13. Facilities Equipment Replacement Project- 14. Fuel Dispenser Replacement-$2.4 million $1.219 million Project Scope Project Scope This project will replace 16 diesel and 1 gasoline dispensers that are This project allows for the scheduled replacement of equipment outdated and near the end of their useful life. The project will also that has reached the end of its useful life. Scheduled replacements replace all Under-Dispenser Containment (UDCs) for these in the two-year period include forklifts, bus lifts, compressors, parts dispensers. carousels, stationary pressure washers, and brake lathes. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.920 $0.480 VTA Local $1.219 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Estimated savings of $10,000 per year due to reduced maintenance None costs for newer equipment. Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.4 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.219 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-November 2020
Page 12 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
15. Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement 16. Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements-$3.0 Project-$1.25 million million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will enhance security at the Guadalupe Light Rail This project will replace and upgrade the existing steam rack track Division by relocating the security guard house and installing with a new liner system and overhead roof structure. The steam equipment to bolster security measures. rack is used to clean the undercarriage of light rail vehicles to remove heavy debris and grease buildup to assist with visual Funding (in millions) inspections. This improvement will ensure the proper collection of contaminated water and reduce unnecessary collection and Federal-5307 VTA Local treatment of rainwater. $1.000 $0.250 Funding (in millions)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Federal-5337 VTA Local Business Line(s) Supported $2.400 $0.600 • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Delivering Projects and Programs 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Anticipated annual maintenance expense of $1,000 for CCTV • Transportation System Management cameras, electronic card readers and crossing gates. Operating Budget Impact $1.25 million Estimated Total Project Cost- Estimated annual net savings of $7,000 due to reduction in water Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020 treatment chemicals required for improved steam rack system. Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2021
Page 13 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
17. Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement-$1.0 18. Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning million (HVAC) Replacement Program FY20-$1.81 million Project Scope This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding Project Scope needed to remove and replace the light rail vehicle wash system This project will replace HVAC units that have reached the end of that has reached the end of its useful life. their working life spans at various VTA facilities. The new Funding (in millions) equipment will be integrated into the overall Energy Management System that will allow automated control functions to maximize efficiency of operation and track costs. Federal-5337 VTA Local Funding (in millions) $0.800 $0.200
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.448 $0.362 Business Line(s) Supported
• Faster Frequent Reliable Transit 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported Some savings anticipated from reduced overtime for maintenance • Transportation System Management workers. Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.81 million Annual savings of $5,000 to $20,000 depending on size of unit due Anticipated Completion Date-July 2021 to improved energy efficiency. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.81 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 14 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
19. LED Exterior Lighting Replacement-$0.75 20. Painting Management Program FY20-$1.755 million million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding This project provides painting maintenance and repair to the required to retrofit existing facilities with energy efficient LED light exterior and interiors of all VTA operational, administrative and fixtures to improve lighting levels and reduce energy consumption. passenger facilities. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local VTA Local $0.750 $1.755
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None Based on previous LED upgrades, energy savings of 22% of project Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.755 million cost and maintenance savings of 10% of project costs are anticipated. These savings result in an approximate 3-year payback Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 on investment. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.838 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 15 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
21. Pavement Management Program FY14- 22. Pavement Management Program FY20- $1.121 million $1.856 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding This project addresses immediate pavement failure issues and needed for pavement rehabilitation and repair for the North maintains the existing assets in a condition that preserves them Division Operating Facility. from future failure. Planned activities in the two-year period include general maintenance, rehabilitation of two lots at the River Funding (in millions) Oaks Administration Facility, and slurry seal and restriping at various Cerone Division locations. VTA Local Funding (in millions) $1.121
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% VTA Local $1.856 Business Line(s) Supported
• Faster Frequent Reliable Transit 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping pavement in • Transportation System Management a state of good repair. Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.437 million Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping pavement in Anticipated Completion Date-January 2021 a state of good repair. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.856 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 16 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
23. Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe 24. Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe and Chaboya-$1.5 million Division-$2.5 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will replace the fire alarm systems at the Guadalupe and This project will replace roll-up doors at Guadalupe Division with Chaboya Operating Facilities which are progressively degrading newer updated models that have modern safety precautions. The leading to extremely high maintenance costs. existing doors have reached the end of their useful life and replacement parts for repair are no longer available. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.200 $0.300 Federal-5337 VTA Local $2.000 $0.500
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Annual net savings of $38,000 due to elimination of repairs and Operating Budget Impact maintenance of old system. Annual net savings of $15,000 due to less maintenance and repair costs for newer updated models. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.5 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.5 million Anticipated Completion Date-January 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-December 2020
Page 17 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
25. Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies 26. Roofing Management Program FY20-$1.365 (UPS) at Guadalupe-$0.472 million million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will replace various uninterruptable power supplies This project funds the ongoing, comprehensive program to (UPS) and power distribution units at the Guadalupe Light Rail maximize the useful life and integrity of VTA facilities. Planned Operating Facility which have reached the end of their useful life. activities in the two-year period include general maintenance, and re-roofing of various areas at the North Division Operating Facility. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 VTA Local $0.377 $0.094 VTA Local $1.365
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None Estimated annual savings of $30,000 from reduced energy costs in air-conditioned spaces and reduced man-hours lost due to $0.472 million Estimated Total Project Cost- disruptions from roof leaks or other water intrusions. Anticipated Completion Date-May 2020 Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.365 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 18 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
27. Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building- $0.56 million Light Rail Way, Power & Signal 28. Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20-$1.0 Project Scope million This project will expand the existing building for storage of Way, Power and Signals material and equipment at the Guadalupe Light Project Scope Rail Facility to provide for secure storage, protection from the This project will provide corrective work as necessary for elements, and elimination of potential storm water contamination. compliance with California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Funding (in millions) regulations. Funding (in millions) VTA Local $0.560 Federal-5337 VTA Local $0.800 $0.200 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
• Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None None Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.56 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-May 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-July 2022
Page 19 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
29. Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure 30. Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Stabilization-$0.35 million Improvements-$6.15 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding This project augmentation will extend safety enhancements to the required to complete stabilization of the Hamilton Bridge Structure. full Downtown San Jose Transit Mall (1st and 2nd street from St. James to San Carlos) to deter pedestrian, bicycle, scooter, and Funding (in millions) vehicle intrusion into the light rail trackway. Funding (in millions) Federal-5337 VTA Local $0.280 $0.070
Federal-5337 VTA Local 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $4.920 $1.230
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.55 million Annual maintenance costs estimated at $30,000. April 2020 Anticipated Completion Date- Estimated Total Project Cost-$7.05 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 20 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
31. Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20-$6.6 32. OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20- million $15.65 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will procure and install special trackwork, double This project funds the rehabilitation and replacement of portions of crossovers, manual switches, and overhead catenary systems at two the light rail Overhead Catenary System (OCS) as identified in locations (Capitol/Mabury and North First/Bonaventura) along the various assessment studies. The rehabilitation activities include existing light rail corridor to improve operational flexibility and replacement of contact wires, wire support systems, under bridge reliability. supports, and feeder cables. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local Federal-5337 VTA Local $6.600 $12.520 $3.130
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Potential cost savings due to improved operational flexibility. Potential maintenance and emergency repair cost savings associated with keeping the assets in a state of good repair. Estimated Total Project Cost-$6.6 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$15.65 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2022 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 21 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
33. Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20- 34. Track Intrusion Abatement FY20-$5.0 million $14.3 million Project Scope Project Scope This project will take steps to prevent track intrusion at priority This project is part of a capital replacement and maintenance segments as evaluated by VTA’s Safety Committee. Planned program to ensure that the Light Rail track infrastructure remains improvements include signage, pavement striping, fencing and safe, reliable and in an enhanced state of good repair. The scope of barriers. this request includes rehabilitation and replacement of track Funding (in millions) components as identified by inspections and assessments. Funding (in millions) Federal-5337 VTA Local $4.000 $1.000
Federal-5337 VTA Local $11.440 $2.860 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$5.0 million Potential maintenance and emergency repair cost savings associated with keeping the assets in a state of good repair. Anticipated Completion Date-November 2021 Estimated Total Project Cost-$14.3 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2022
Page 22 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
35. Union Pacific Culvert Replacement-$0.44 36. Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking- million $3.4 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project consists of assessment and design for the replacement This project augmentation will complete the redesign of existing of Union Pacific Structure 4 – Hacienda Culvert due to visible relay-based interlocking at Ohlone/Chynoweth to implement a fully deterioration. Additional funds for construction will be requested in functioning interlocking using existing infrastructure where possible. the next budget cycle. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5337 VTA Local VTA Local $2.720 $0.680 $0.440
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Reduced maintenance costs and equipment failures due to None increased system reliability. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.44 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.6 million Anticipated Completion Date-October 2022 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 23 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
38. Bus Stop Improvement Program-$1.442 Passenger Facilities million 37. ADA Upgrades at Facilities-$3.2 million Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation funds the continued implementation of bus stop improvements systemwide for improved passenger safety, This project will modify, construct and mitigate ADA (Americans comfort and access. Planned improvements include new and with Disabilities Act) non-compliant items at various VTA facilities. replacement shelters, lighting, access improvements including safe Funding (in millions) sidewalk connections, passenger information signs and security. Funding (in millions) Federal-5307 VTA Local $2.560 $0.640 2016 Measure B State-Lifeline $1.300 $0.142 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.2 million Annual maintenance of new shelters estimated at $50,000. Anticipated Completion Date-April 2022 Estimated Total Project Cost-$6.729 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 24 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
39. Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement- 40. Light Rail Platform Public Address System $0.557 million Upgrade-$2.77 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will replace CCTV equipment at four to six Light Rail This project will replace existing equipment on older Public Address Station platforms. (PA) systems such as power lines, amplifiers, preamp/mixers; upgrade PA maintenance telephones; and augment, test and Funding (in millions) commission the PA system on all stations. Funding (in millions) Federal-5337 VTA Local $0.446 $0.111
Federal-5337 VTA Local 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $2.216 $0.554
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Estimated annual savings of $18,000 initially due to reduced number of maintenance calls for newer equipment. Operating Budget Impact Estimated net annual saving of $139,000 due to reduced Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.557 million maintenance costs for new equipment. June 2020 Anticipated Completion Date- Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.77 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 25 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
41. Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20-$0.97 42. North San Jose Transportation million Improvements-$3.0 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will provide rehabilitation and repair for various light This project will plan, design and construct eligible transit projects in rail stations including repainting, crack sealing, light pole North San Jose using developer fees collected by the City of San replacement, tactile warning band replacement, concrete repair, Jose. etc. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Other-San Jose $3.000 Federal-5337 VTA Local $0.776 $0.194 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Annual maintenance of various improvements estimated at $5,000. None Estimated Total Project Cost-$6.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.97 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-February 2022
Page 26 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
43. Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings- 44. Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators $8.2 million and Escalators-$9.3 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will install pedestrian gates at several crossings along This project will repair and rehabilitate elevators and escalators at the Guadalupe and Tasman West light rail corridors to enhance various locations along the light rail system. safety at pedestrian crossings. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-5337 VTA Local Federal-5337 VTA Local $7.440 $1.860 $6.560 $1.640
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None Anticipated savings from reduction in ongoing maintenance costs. Estimated Total Project Cost-$8.2 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$9.3 million Anticipated Completion Date-March 2022 Anticipated Completion Date-December 2021
Page 27 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
45. San Jose Diridon Station Plan-$10.0 million 46. Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20-$2.0 million Project Scope This project augmentation will complete funding required for the Project Scope planning, environmental clearance and preliminary engineering of This project will provide for refurbishment and repair of the San Jose Diridon Station Multimodal Transportation Center. maintenance issues at transit centers and park and ride lots Funding (in millions) throughout the VTA service area. Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B Other-Partners $2.500 $7.500 Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.600 $0.400 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Development of a new station will have operating and maintenance Operating Budget Impact cost impacts on the entities involved in the project. Determination Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping assets in a of how the station will be managed, funded and governed is part of state of good repair. the project scope. Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$16.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-September 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 28 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
48. Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution- Information Systems & Technology $2.266 million 47. Advanced Cyber Security-$0.4 million Project Scope Project Scope This project will design and implement an advanced yard management solution to locate vehicles anywhere in the yard real This project augmentation provides funding to complete time. The solution provides 24x7 tracking, even when vehicles and development of a cyber security program including software, onboard systems are powered down, reports on vehicle inventory, hardware, network monitoring tools, anti-malware tools, pullout performance, and vehicle movement in the yard. consulting/audit/testing services, training, and development/update of policies and procedures to mitigate risk. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local $2.266 VTA Local $0.400 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported
Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Delivering Projects and Programs • Delivering Projects and Programs • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Ongoing maintenance and support for security technologies, amount to be determined. Operation efficiency savings are anticipated due to elimination of manual tracking of vehicles. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.2 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.266 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 29 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
49. Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent-$0.207 50. Disaster Recovery Cloud-$0.5 million million Project Scope Project Scope This project will secure a Cloud Disaster Recovery site to replicate This project would design and build an interactive virtual agent, VTA’s production servers enabling VTA computer systems to commonly known as a “Chatbot”. This software can efficiently help function during a major emergency or disaster. VTA customers and potentially other audiences with basic needs Funding (in millions) 24/7/365 and in multiple languages. Funding (in millions) VTA Local $0.500
VTA Local $0.207 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Delivering Projects and Programs Annual maintenance costs estimated at $100,000. • Transportation System Management Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.5 million Operating Budget Impact Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020 Annual maintenance costs estimated at $26,000 offset by savings from operational efficiencies. Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.207 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 30 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
51. Enterprise Database for Key Performance 52. Geographic Information System (GIS) Indicators-$0.5 million Program Development-$0.802 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will create an enterprise transit database as a central This project supports the continued development of the VTA GIS repository of key performance data used agency-wide for analysis, Program and its products. These products provide geospatial planning, tracking, measuring, reporting, and decision-making information and solutions to all VTA divisions and departments, purposes. external data feeds, big data management and analysis, open data proliferation, and Congestion Management Member Agencies. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local $0.500 VTA Local $0.802
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Annual maintenance costs including software subscriptions Annual maintenance costs estimated at $8,000 offset by savings estimated at $50,000. from operational efficiencies. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.052 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.65 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2022
Page 31 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
53. Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade-$1.5 54. Records Management Program-$2.9 million million Project Scope Project Scope This project provides software, hardware, and consulting services This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed needed to deploy an in-depth electronic record management to upgrade VTA’s backbone network to enhance network capacity. It program, including resources to help in the transition of business will provide for additional fiber optic installations as well as minor processes and documents to an Electronic Document Management equipment to help augment VTA’s existing wide area network. System (EDMS). This augmentation will build on tools previously implemented to automate other critical, paper centric business Funding (in millions) processes. Funding (in millions) Federal-5307 VTA Local $1.200 $0.300 VTA Local $2.900 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Delivering Projects and Programs Annual increase to maintenance support contract of $80,000. Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.2 million None Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Estimated Total Project Cost-$5.688 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 32 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
55. River Oaks Campus Network Cabling-$1.4 56. SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation- million $1.5 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will install a new physical copper wire network (voice, This project will implement SAP HANA, a business data platform that data, video) for portions of the River Oaks Administration campus. processes transactions and analytics with built-in advanced analytics The current cabling system is experiencing a 30% failure rate. This and multi-model data processing engines. Deployment of the SAP effort will allow for deployment of network intensive software or HANA data platform allows for simplification of technology applications and improve network stability and reliability. landscapes, eliminating data preparation and allowing instant access to structured and unstructured data from different sources. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
VTA Local $1.400 VTA Local $1.500
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact Annual savings estimated at $20,000 per year due to decreased Operating Budget Impact need to maintain and troubleshoot old, failing network. Annual maintenance fees estimated at $145,600. Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.4 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.5 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020
Page 33 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
57. SCADA Hardware, Software and Network 58. Server Refresh-$0.8 million Upgrade-$5.559 million Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed This project will augment, test, and commission all three to replace aging server equipment that has reached the end of its components of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition useful life in order to provide maximum uptime and minimize (SCADA) system: hardware, network equipment, and software. The unplanned system outages. SCADA system provides safety critical controls for operation of the Funding (in millions) light rail system. The existing associated hardware and software are at the end of their useful lives. This update is essential for the system to remain operational in the event of a hardware or network VTA Local equipment failure. $0.800 Funding (in millions) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Federal-5337 VTA Local $4.447 $1.112 • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% None Business Line(s) Supported Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.3 million • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020 Operating Budget Impact Application software support estimated at $200,000 per year. Estimated Total Project Cost-$5.559 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2021
Page 34 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
59. Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model- 60. Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation $0.96 million Tool-$0.38 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation provides remaining funding needed to This project involves the creation of a “VMT Estimation Tool” (an complete the development of the new travel demand model to online, Geographic Information Systems-based tool) to allow VTA meet the Model Consistency Requirements set for by the and the Congestion Management Member Agencies to estimate Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), while improving Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for land use projects and plans. This model accuracy and expanding model functionalities. tool is necessary due to the enactment of Senate Bill (SB) 743, which calls for agencies to move away from the use of Level of Service Funding (in millions) (LOS) and towards the use of VMT in transportation analysis. Funding (in millions) CMP Other-Cities VTA Local $0.470 $0.210 $0.280
Federal-STP CMP Other-Cities 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.130 $0.115 $0.135
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.61 million None June 2021 Anticipated Completion Date- Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.38 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020
Page 35 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
61. VTA Gigabit Network Project-$1.2 million Miscellaneous Project Scope 62. Caltrain Capital – Annual Local Match-$10.0 This project will provide optic fiber installation, network equipment million and materials necessary to support the increased needs for new passenger, fare payments, CCTV (closed circuit television), audio, Project Scope passenger information and other systems being installed throughout This project provides funding for VTA’s portion of Caltrain’s Capital VTA's WAN (wide area network) and MAN (metropolitan area program. The contributions from the funding partners (VTA, the City network). This budget augmentation will fund the project through and County of San Francisco, and the San Mateo County Transit completion. District) are primarily used to match state and federal grant funds Funding (in millions) that are provided to Caltrain. Funding (in millions)
Federal-5307 VTA Local $0.960 $0.240 State-STA/SGR VTA Local $9.414 $0.586 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported • Operating Budget Impact Faster Frequent Reliable Transit • Transportation System Management Annual hardware warranty and system support estimated at $120,000. Operating Budget Impact There is no direct operating costs impact to VTA. Operating and Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.590 million maintenance costs for Caltrain service are incorporated in the Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Caltrain operating subsidy. Estimated Total Project Cost-$10.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 36 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
63. Capital Contingency-$4.0 million 64. Community-Based Transportation Plans-$0.3 million Project Scope This appropriation is a placeholder for projects that are not Project Scope currently anticipated but may arise during the two-year budget This project will complete Community-Based Transportation Plans cycle. These funds are administered by the Capital Improvement for Santa Clara County as required by the Metropolitan Program Oversight Committee, which is composed of VTA’s Division Transportation Commission (MTC) for all Congestion Management Chiefs and Directors. Unused Capital Contingency appropriation expires at the end of the two-year budget cycle. Agencies (CMAs). These studies will improve access and mobility for low-income communities and engage residents and community Funding (in millions) organizations in conducting the analysis and shaping the recommendations.
Other-TBD VTA Local Funding (in millions) $2.000 $2.000
Federal-STP 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.300 Business Line(s) Supported • N/A 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported Potential impact on operating cost is dependent on nature of • Delivering Projects and Programs identified activities. Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.0 million None Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.3 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 37 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
65. Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans- 66. Facility and Fleet Plan-$0.715 million $1.0 million Project Scope Project Scope This project would develop a facility and fleet plan outlining the This project will study key congested corridors in Santa Clara Valley roadmap for future fleet purchases and facility needs in light of to produce a comprehensive multimodal corridor plan. The program state policies that require VTA to modernize its fleet to be in line is designed to reduce congestion by identifying improvements while with California Air Resources Board (CARB) requirements by 2030. preserving the character of the local community. The state requires Funding (in millions) that local agencies develop corridor plans to be eligible for funding through the Solutions for Congested Corridor Program. Funding (in millions) VTA Local $0.715
Federal-TBD State-TBD CMP 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.250 $0.250 $0.500 Business Line(s) Supported
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management
Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.715 million None Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021 Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-July 2021
Page 38 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
67. FAST Program Implementation-$6.244 68. Santa Clara Great America Intermodal million Station Master Plan-$0.75 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will implement transit signal priority, bus stop balancing This project will study potential designs to upgrade the existing and other speed-related improvements in frequent transit corridors Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station to a multi-level, to improve travel times and reduce operating costs. urban-style station that would serve the new growth and transportation demand proposed by City Place, Levi’s Stadium and Funding (in millions) future development in the city of Santa Clara. Funding (in millions) VTA Local State-LCTOP $3.400 $2.844
Other-Santa Clara 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.750
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Estimates indicate that an increase in average speed of one mile- • Delivering Projects and Programs per-hour would reduce annual operating costs by over $15M per • Transportation System Management year. Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$11.2 million None Anticipated Completion Date-June 2023 Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.75 million Anticipated Completion Date-January 2021
Page 39 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
69. South County Rail Study-$0.75 million 70. State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering-$2.365 million Project Scope This project will study potential options for enhanced South Santa Project Scope Clara County heavy rail service in relation to the potential service This project will fund preliminary engineering for the investment expansion as part of the 2016 Measure B program. decision identified by the SR 85 Transit Guideway Study. This will Funding (in millions) include refined corridor definition, potential station locations, updated capital and operating cost estimates, and ridership projections. 2016 Measure B Funding (in millions) $0.750
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 Measure B $2.365 Business Line(s) Supported
• Transportation System Management 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported None • Delivering Projects and Programs Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.75 million • Transportation System Management Anticipated Completion Date-December 2020 Operating Budget Impact Updated operating cost estimates would be determined as part of the project scope. Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.365 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 40 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund
71. VA Pilot Smart Shuttle-$3.375 million
Project Scope This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed for this five-year pilot project. The goal of the project is to develop a “Comprehensive Autonomous Shuttle System” featuring on-demand or pre-scheduled service for all types of passengers in and around the Palo Alto Hospital area using a connected autonomous shuttle and pre-identified Smart Stop locations. Funding (in millions)
Federal-IDEA VTA Local $2.700 $0.675
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact None Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.74 million Anticipated Completion Date-July 2022
Page 41 of 63
8.a
SECTION 2 2000 Measure A
Program
Page 42 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-2000 Measure A Program
(Dollars in Thousands)
Funding Source
Project
B
A
Total Total
2016 2016 2000
Measure Measure Measure 1. SVRT Project Development After FY09 150,000 563,500 713,500 SVRT Program Total 150,000 563,500 713,500 2. Eastridge to BART Regional Connector 0 129,700 129,700 Light Rail Program Total 0 129,700 129,700 3. Capitalized Interest and Other Bond Costs 0 60,485 60,485 Measure A Programwide Total 0 60,485 60,485
Grand Total 150,000 753,685 903,685
Page 43 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-2000 Measure A Program
SVRT Program Light Rail Program 1. SVRT Project Development After FY09- 2. Eastridge to BART Regional Connector- $713.5 million $129.7 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project provides BART Silicon Valley program management as This project will construct a light rail extension from Alum Rock to well as work specific to Phase II of the BART Silicon Valley. Phase II the Eastridge Transit Center with a continuous elevated guideway. work to be undertaken in the two-year period includes engineering, The extension will include LRT stations at Story Road (aerial) and right-of-way and advance utility relocation efforts, long lead Eastridge (at-grade). construction, and procurement items. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2000 Measure A 2000 Measure A 2016 Measure B $129.700 $563.500 $150.000
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs • Delivering Projects and Programs • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Operating and maintenance costs are estimated at $2-$3 million Ongoing operating and maintenance costs are currently under annually depending on service frequency. negotiation with BART. These expenditures will be funded by BART Estimated Total Project Cost-$453.0 million fare revenues and the 2008 Measure B one-eighth sales tax. December 2024 Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.78 billion Anticipated Completion Date- Anticipated Completion Date-December 2026
Page 44 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-2000 Measure A Program
Measure A Programwide 3. Capitalized Interest and Other Bond Costs- $60.485 million
Project Scope This project represents the capitalized portion of interest and debt related ancillary charges that arise from the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds, the proceeds of which fund a portion of various 2000 Measure A capital projects. Funding (in millions)
2000 Measure A $60.485
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact None Estimated Total Project Cost-N/A Anticipated Completion Date-March 2036
Page 45 of 63
8.a
SECTION 3
VTP Highway Program
Page 46 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
(Dollars in Thousands)
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
2016 2016
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure 1. Calaveras Boulevard Near-term Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000 2. Freeway Performance Initiative Phase 2 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 3. I-280 Foothill Expressway Ramp Improvements 0 0 800 0 800 4. I-280 HOV: Magdalena Ave to San Mateo County Line 0 0 1,800 200 2,000 5. I-280 Soundwalls 0 2,000 0 0 2,000 6. I-280/Saratoga Ave Interchange Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000 7. I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange Improvements 0 0 8,000 0 8,000 8. I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvements 0 0 2,600 0 2,600 9. I-680 Sound Walls 0 1,000 0 0 1,000 10. I-680/Alum Rock/McKee Interchange Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000 11. Noise Reduction Program on SR 85 0 100 7,525 0 7,625 12. SR 17/SR 9 Interchange Improvements 0 0 3,600 400 4,000 13. SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield Road 0 0 34,000 5,500 39,500 14. SR 237/Great America Pkwy WB Off-Ramp Improvements 0 0 1,500 0 1,500 15. SR 237/US 101/Mathilda Ave Landscaping Project 0 0 3,000 0 3,000 16. US 101 De La Cruz/Trimble Interchange Improvements 0 0 50,600 0 50,600 17. US 101 San Antonio/Charleston/Rengstorff Ramp Impvmt 0 0 1,800 200 2,000 18. US 101/I-880 Interchange Improvement Feasibility Study 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 19. US 101/SR 25 Interchange Improvements 0 0 55,000 0 55,000 Highways Total 2,000 3,100 175,625 8,400 189,125 20. Lawrence Expressway Grade Separation 0 0 22,500 2,500 25,000 Expressways Total 0 0 22,500 2,500 25,000
Page 47 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
Funding Source
Project
B
Total Total
2016 2016
State
Other
Federal Measure Measure
21. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - Electronic Toll System (ETS) 0 0 0 22,000 22,000 22. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101 Phase 5 0 5,000 0 0 5,000 23. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101/SR 85 Phase 4 0 2,300 0 7,700 10,000 Express Lanes Total 0 7,300 0 29,700 37,000 24. Bicycle Superhighway Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis 0 0 480 1,520 2,000 25. Countywide Bike and Ped Education/Encouragement Program 0 0 500 0 500 26. King Road Ped Safety and Transit Access Improvements 0 2,816 0 0 2,816 Bicycle & Pedestrian Total 0 2,816 980 1,520 5,316 27. Bascom Complete Streets Project 5,137 0 5,137 0 10,274 28. Story-Keyes Complete Streets Project 0 0 7,668 0 7,668 29. Tasman Corridor Complete Streets Project 828 0 7,452 0 8,280 Complete Streets Total 5,965 0 20,257 0 26,222 Grand Total 7,965 13,216 219,362 42,120 282,663
Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding.
Page 48 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
2. Freeway Performance Initiative Phase 2-$2.0 Highways million 1. Calaveras Boulevard Near-term Improvements- $2.0 million Project Scope This project augmentation funds future phases of work on MTC’s Project Scope Freeway Performance Initiative program designed to maximize efficiency of the existing highways using technology. The project’s This project will construct High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) bypass purpose is to prepare plans and construct improvements to lanes at the westbound SR 237 on-ramp from McCarthy Boulevard implement technologies that provide for better surveillance of and at the westbound SR 237 on-ramp from Calaveras Boulevard in traffic conditions. Milpitas. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
Federal-FPI 2016 Measure B Other-Milpitas $2.000 $1.800 $0.200
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None None Estimated Total Project Cost-$9.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2026 Anticipated Completion Date-May 2023
Page 49 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
3. I-280 Foothill Expressway Ramp 4. I-280 HOV: Magdalena Ave to San Mateo Improvements-$0.8 million County Line-$2.0 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation completes funding needed to add one This project will construct a new High-Occupancy Vehicle new off-ramp lane, retaining walls, new lighting, and related (HOV)/Express Lane on I-280 between Magdalena Avenue and the improvements at the northbound I-280 off-ramp to Foothill San Mateo County Line. The requested budget is for the Project Expressway in Los Altos. Initiation Document only. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B 2016 Measure B Other-TBD $0.800 $1.800 $0.200
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None None Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$60.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2021 Anticipated Completion Date-December 2025
Page 50 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
5. I-280 Soundwalls-$2.0 million 6. I-280/Saratoga Ave Interchange Improvements-$2.0 million Project Scope This project will construct soundwalls along I-280 between Los Project Scope Gatos Creek and Bird Avenue in San Jose. The requested budget is This project will modify the I-280/Saratoga Avenue interchange to for the Project Approval/Environmental Document and Plans, improve operations for local and freeway traffic including adding Specifications, and Estimates phases of the project. bicycle and pedestrian facilities on Saratoga Avenue in San Jose. The Funding (in millions) requested budget will fund the Project Initiation Document including related preliminary engineering efforts. Funding (in millions) State-STIP $2.000
2016 Measure B Other-San Jose $1.800 $0.200 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$7.0 million None Anticipated Completion Date-April 2026 Estimated Total Project Cost-$60.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2027
Page 51 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
7. I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange 8. I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvements- Improvements-$8.0 million $2.6 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of Project Approval/Environmental Documents and the final design, Project Approval/Environmental Documents and final design for the plans, specifications and estimate in order to construct I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange improvements in Cupertino. improvements near the I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange in Funding (in millions) San Jose. Funding (in millions) 2016 Measure B $2.600
2016 Measure B $8.000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$85.0 million None December 2025 Estimated Total Project Cost-$90 million Anticipated Completion Date- Anticipated Completion Date-December 2025
Page 52 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
9. I-680 Sound Walls-$1.0 million 10. I-680/Alum Rock/McKee Interchange Improvements-$2.0 million Project Scope This project augmentation will complete the funding needed to Project Scope construct sound walls along I-680 between Capitol Expressway and This project will modify the I-680/Alum Rock Avenue/McKee Road Mueller Avenue in San Jose. interchange to improve operations for local and freeway traffic. It Funding (in millions) will also add bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the Alum Rock Avenue and McKee Road overcrossings. The requested budget will fund the Project Initiation Document including related preliminary
State-STIP engineering efforts. $1.000 Funding (in millions)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 Measure B Other-San Jose Business Line(s) Supported $1.800 $0.200 • Transportation System Management
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Operating Budget Impact None Business Line(s) Supported Estimated Total Project Cost-$7.0 million • Transportation System Management Anticipated Completion Date-August 2021 Operating Budget Impact None Estimated Total Project Cost-$40.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-August 2024
Page 53 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
11. Noise Reduction Program on SR 85-$7.625 12. SR 17/SR 9 Interchange Improvements-$4.0 million million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will address noise reduction along the SR The project proposes to modify the SR 17 /SR 9 interchange to 85 corridor including the preliminary engineering and project relieve congestion and improve traffic operations on the freeway environmental documents process, and noise reduction pilot project and local roadways. Scope includes modifying existing on- and off- design and construction. ramps and local intersections and upgrading bicycle/pedestrian facilities at this interchange. The requested budget will fund Funding (in millions) completion of the Project Initiation Document and Project Approval/Environmental Document. 2016 Measure B State-TBD Funding (in millions) $7.525 $0.100
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 Measure B Other-Los Gatos $3.600 $0.400 Business Line(s) Supported
• Transportation System Management 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Operating Budget Impact Business Line(s) Supported None • Transportation System Management Estimated Total Project Cost-$10.0 million Operating Budget Impact Anticipated Completion Date-December 2025 None Estimated Total Project Cost-$19.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2026
Page 54 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
13. SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield 14. SR 237/Great America Pkwy WB Off-Ramp Road-$39.5 million Improvements-$1.5 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will address local traffic operations and This project will modify the westbound SR 237 off-ramp to Great bicycle/pedestrian accommodations by construction of a loop on- America Parkway in Santa Clara to improve operations including ramp from northbound Middlefield Road to westbound SR 237 in modifications to local intersections and upgrades to Mountain View. The requested funds are for the Project bicycle/pedestrian facilities as necessary. The requested budget is Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase of the project for completion of the Project Initiation Document. and right-of-way acquisitions. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B Other- 2016 Measure B $1.500 Mountain View $34.000 $5.500 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None None Estimated Total Project Cost-$13.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$55.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2025 Anticipated Completion Date-September 2024
Page 55 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
15. SR 237/US 101/Mathilda Ave Landscaping 16. US 101 De La Cruz/Trimble Interchange Project-$3.0 million Improvements-$50.6 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project provides for completion of plans, specification and This project augmentation funds completion of final design, right-of- estimate, right of way, and construction to complete the landscape way, and construction for improvements in the vicinity of the US contract for the US 101/SR 237 Mathilda project in Sunnyvale. 101/Trimble Road Interchange in San Jose. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B 2016 Measure B $3.000 $50.600
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Ongoing maintenance costs will be the responsibility of the City of None Sunnyvale and Caltrans. Estimated Total Project Cost-$60.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2023 Anticipated Completion Date-August 2022
Page 56 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
17. US 101 San Antonio/Charleston/Rengstorff 18. US 101/I-880 Interchange Improvement Ramp Improvements-$2.0 million Feasibility Study-$1.5 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of This project will fund a feasibility study for improvements to the US Project Initiation Documents and Project Approval/Environmental 101/I-880 interchange. The project proposes to develop geometric Documents for US 101 southbound improvements at the San alternatives to improve freeway to freeway operations, reduce the Antonio Road and Charleston Road/Rengstorff Avenue ramps in Palo US 101 and I-880 corridor congestion, and improve local street Alto and Mountain View. circulation within the North San Jose area. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B Other-City Other-TBD $1.800 $0.200 $1.500
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Transportation System Management Operating Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact None None Estimated Total Project Cost-$40.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.5 million Anticipated Completion Date-December 2026 Anticipated Completion Date-December 2020
Page 57 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
19. US 101/SR 25 Interchange Improvements- $55.0 million Expressways 20. Lawrence Expressway Grade Separation- Project Scope $25.0 million This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed for completion of right-of-way and construction phases for Project Scope reconstruction of the US 101/SR 25 Interchange and additional ramp This project proposes to improve traffic operations by constructing lanes in Gilroy. grade separation intersections along Lawrence Expressway at Reed Funding (in millions) Avenue/Monroe Street, Kifer Road, and Arques Avenue in Santa Clara. The requested funds are for the completion of the Preliminary Engineering and Project Approval/Environmental 2016 Measure B Document. $55.000 Funding (in millions)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Other-SC 2016 Measure B Business Line(s) Supported County $22.500 • Transportation System Management $2.500
Operating Budget Impact 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
None Business Line(s) Supported Estimated Total Project Cost-$65.0 million • Transportation System Management Anticipated Completion Date-December 2024 Operating Budget Impact None Estimated Total Project Cost-$500.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2023
Page 58 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
22. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101 Phase Express Lanes 5-$5.0 million 21. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - Electronic Toll System (ETS)-$22.0 million Project Scope This project will implement a roadway pricing system on US 101 by Project Scope converting the existing carpool lane to an Express Lane on US 101 (between the SR 237 and I-880 interchanges) and add a second This project will develop and implement an Electronic Toll System Express Lane to create a dual Express Lanes system within this (ETS) to support the US 101/SR 85 Express Lanes projects. segment of US 101. The requested funds are for the final civil design Funding (in millions) and right-of-way services. Funding (in millions)
Other-Financing $22.000 State-STIP $5.000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
• Delivering Projects and Programs Business Line(s) Supported • Transportation System Management • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management Ongoing operating and maintenance costs will be funded from Operating Budget Impact future toll revenues. Ongoing operating and maintenance costs will be funded from Estimated Total Project Cost-$51.001 million future toll revenues. Anticipated Completion Date-December 2024 Estimated Total Project Cost-$111.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2025
Page 59 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
23. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101/SR 85 Phase 4-$10.0 million Bicycle & Pedestrian 24. Bicycle Superhighway Feasibility and Project Scope Alternatives Analysis-$2.0 million This project augmentation will provide the remaining funds needed for construction to convert the existing carpool lanes to Express Project Scope Lanes on SR 85 from the US 101/SR 85 interchange in South San Jose This project will fund a feasibility study and alternative analysis for a to SR 87, including the existing US 101/SR 85 direct High-Occupancy continuous high-quality, low-stress protected bikeway between Palo Vehicle (HOV) to HOV connector ramps and the approaches to and Alto and East San Jose. The plan will ultimately identify a list of from US 101. improvements that increase transportation options for the corridor, Funding (in millions) including connection to existing and planned bike trails and to the Berryessa/North San Jose BART station.
State-STIP Other-Financing Funding (in millions) $2.300 $7.700
2016 Measure B Other-City Other-TBD Other-LPR 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% $0.480 $0.200 1.12 0.2
Business Line(s) Supported • 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Delivering Projects and Programs • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management Ongoing operating and maintenance costs will be funded from Operating Budget Impact future toll revenues. None Estimated Total Project Cost-$34.0 million Estimated Total Project Cost-$2.0 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2022 Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 60 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
25. Countywide Bike and Ped Education/ 26. King Road Ped Safety and Transit Access Encouragement Program-$0.5 million Improvements-$2.816 million
Project Scope Project Scope This project will deliver up to five countywide education and This project augmentation completes funding required to construct encouragement programs. VTA, in collaboration with the Santa pedestrian safety improvements recommended in VTA’s Clara County Public Health Department will provide countywide Countywide Pedestrian Access to Transit Plan and San Jose’s Vision support and direct services to encourage walking and bicycling, and Zero Plan along a 4.5-mile stretch of King Road in East San Jose. to educate all roadway users on safe, responsible, and respectful Funding (in millions) driving, walking, and bicycling. Funding (in millions) State-Active Transportation $2.816 2016 Measure B $0.500 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Transportation System Management Business Line(s) Supported Operating Budget Impact • Transportation System Management None Operating Budget Impact Estimated Total Project Cost-$3.502 million None January 2022 Estimated Total Project Cost-$0.5 million Anticipated Completion Date- Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 61 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
28. Story-Keyes Complete Streets Project-$7.668 Complete Streets million 27. Bascom Complete Streets Project-$10.274 million Project Scope This project augmentation funds final design, engineering and Project Scope environmental clearance of improvements to transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Story-Keyes corridor from This project augmentation funds environmental clearance, right-of- Willow Street/SR 87 to Story Road/Capitol Expressway. way, and 100% design to improve transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Bascom corridor from I-880 to SR 85. Funding (in millions) Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B $7.668 2016 Measure B Federal-TBD $5.137 $5.137 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Business Line(s) Supported
Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs • Faster Frequent Reliable Transit Operating Budget Impact • Delivering Projects and Programs None • Transportation System Management Estimated Total Project Cost-$9.058 million Operating Budget Impact Anticipated Completion Date-August 2022 None Estimated Total Project Cost-$11.743 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 62 of 63
8.a FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program
29. Tasman Corridor Complete Streets Project- $8.280 million
Project Scope This project augmentation funds the next phase of improvements to transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Tasman corridor from Tasman/Fair Oaks to Great Mall Parkway/Montague Expressway. The planned activities in the two-year period include environmental clearance, right-of-way, and 100% design. Funding (in millions)
2016 Measure B Federal-TBD $7.452 $0.828
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Business Line(s) Supported • Delivering Projects and Programs Operating Budget Impact None Estimated Total Project Cost-$12.291 million Anticipated Completion Date-June 2021
Page 63 of 63
8.b
VTA Transit Fund Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Projects By Ranking (Unconstrained Review)
Ranking Project # Project Name 2 33 Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20 3 67 FAST Program Implementation 4 32 OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20 5 4 Electric Bus Procurement 6 31 Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20 7 28 Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20 8 11 Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion 9 45 San Jose Diridon Station Plan 10 44 Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators and Escalators 11 12 Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers 12 29 Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization 13 36 Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking 14 30 Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements 15 41 Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20 16 13 Facilities Equipment Replacement Project 17 42 North San Jose Transportation Improvements 18 57 SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade 19 38 Bus Stop Improvement Program 20 40 Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade 21 6 Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program 22 2 Bus CCTV Replacement 23 46 Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20 25 62 Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match 26 35 Union Pacific Culvert Replacement 27 17 Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement 28 7 Cerone Boiler Replacement 29 55 River Oaks Campus Network Cabling 31 39 Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement 33 48 Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution 34 65 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans 35 61 VTA Gigabit Network Project 36 1 Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement 37 37 ADA Upgrades at Facilities 38 58 Server Refresh 39 66 Facility and Fleet Plan 40 14 Fuel Dispenser Replacement 41 5 Paratransit Fleet Program FY20 42 8 Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement 44 9 Cerone Energy Storage System
Page 1 of 2 8.b
VTA Transit Fund Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Projects By Ranking (Unconstrained Review)
Ranking Project # Project Name 45 56 SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation 46 25 Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guadalupe 47 23 Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya 49 18 HVAC Replacement Program FY20 50 26 Roofing Management Program FY20 51 19 LED Exterior Lighting Replacement 52 59 Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model 55 52 Geographic Information System (GIS) Program Development 56 71 VA Pilot Smart Shuttle 57 43 Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings 58 53 Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade 61 24 Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division 62 22 Pavement Management Program FY20 64 50 Disaster Recovery Cloud 66 47 Advanced Cyber Security 67 64 Community-Based Transportation Plans 68 27 Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building 69 21 Pavement Management Program FY14 70 34 Track Intrusion Abatement FY20 73 20 Painting Management Program FY20 75 51 Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators 77 69 South County Rail Study 78 54 Records Management Program 79 49 Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent 80 68 Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station Master Plan 81 16 Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements 84 60 Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool 85 15 Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project 87 10 Chaboya Yard Well Removal 98 3 Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles Not Ranked* 70 State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering
* Project initially submitted under a different Program and was moved to the VTA Transit Fund after the rating process was completed. Project is 100% funded by 2016 Measure B.
Page 2 of 2 8.c
VTA Transit Fund Proposed FY20 & FY21 Projects Ranking (Unconstrained Review) By Project #
Project # Ranking Project Name 1 36 Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement 2 22 Bus CCTV Replacement 3 98 Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles 4 5 Electric Bus Procurement 5 41 Paratransit Fleet Program FY20 6 21 Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program 7 28 Cerone Boiler Replacement 8 42 Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement 9 44 Cerone Energy Storage System 10 87 Chaboya Yard Well Removal 11 8 Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion 12 11 Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers 13 16 Facilities Equipment Replacement Project 14 40 Fuel Dispenser Replacement 15 85 Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project 16 81 Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements 17 27 Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement 18 49 HVAC Replacement Program FY20 19 51 LED Exterior Lighting Replacement 20 73 Painting Management Program FY20 21 69 Pavement Management Program FY14 22 62 Pavement Management Program FY20 23 47 Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya 24 61 Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division 25 46 Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guadalupe 26 50 Roofing Management Program FY20 27 68 Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building 28 7 Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20 29 12 Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization 30 14 Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements 31 6 Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20 32 4 OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20 33 2 Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20 34 70 Track Intrusion Abatement FY20 35 26 Union Pacific Culvert Replacement 36 13 Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking 37 37 ADA Upgrades at Facilities
Page 1 of 2 8.c
VTA Transit Fund Proposed FY20 & FY21 Projects Ranking (Unconstrained Review) By Project #
Project # Ranking Project Name 38 19 Bus Stop Improvement Program 39 31 Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement 40 20 Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade 41 15 Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20 42 17 North San Jose Transportation Improvements 43 57 Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings 44 10 Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators and Escalators 45 9 San Jose Diridon Station Plan 46 23 Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20 47 66 Advanced Cyber Security 48 33 Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution 49 79 Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent 50 64 Disaster Recovery Cloud 51 75 Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators 52 55 Geographic Information System (GIS) Program Development 53 58 Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade 54 78 Records Management Program 55 29 River Oaks Campus Network Cabling 56 45 SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation 57 18 SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade 58 38 Server Refresh 59 52 Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model 60 84 Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool 61 35 VTA Gigabit Network Project 62 25 Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match 64 67 Community-Based Transportation Plans 65 34 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans 66 39 Facility and Fleet Plan 67 3 FAST Program Implementation 68 80 Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station Master Plan 69 77 South County Rail Study 70 Not Ranked* State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering 71 56 VA Pilot Smart Shuttle
* Project initially submitted under a different Program and was moved to the VTA Transit Fund after the rating process was completed. Project is 100% funded by 2016 Measure B.
Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item #8 Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget
Capital Program Committee Meeting March 28, 2019 Changes Since February Workshop VTA Transit Fund
• Project #67 (FAST Program Implementation) increased $2.844 million to reflect additional grant funding.
• Grant funding mix updated • Project #4 (Electric Bus Procurement) • Project #9 (Cerone Energy Storage System) • Project #11 (Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion)
• Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding category correction (Federal to State)
2 Updated Proposed VTA Transit Fund FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget
Amount # of Category (In millions) Projects Revenue Vehicles & Equipment $37.0 5 Non-Revenue Vehicles $2.4 1 Operating Facilities & Equipment $32.7 21 Light Rail Way, Power, & Signal $52.9 9 Passenger Facilities $41.4 10 Information Systems & Technology $20.9 15 Miscellaneous $29.5 10 Total $216.8 71
Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding 3 Updated Proposed VTA Transit Fund FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget by Funding Source
$60.1M--28% VTA Local $99.6M--46% Federal Grants
$14.7M--7% Other $35.4M--16% State Grants
$6.9M--3% 2016 Measure B
Note: Totals and percentages may not be precise due to independent rounding 4 Updated Proposed VTP Highway Program FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget by Category
Amount # of Category (In millions) Projects Highway $189.1 19 Expressway $25.0 1 Express Lanes $37.0 3 Bike/Ped $5.3 3 Complete Streets $26.2 3 Total $282.7 29
Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding 5 Next Steps
CPC Recommendation of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Today Capital Budget Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget presented at April Board Workshop Community Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial May Budget Advisory Committee Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 May Biennial Budget Board of Directors Adoption of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial June Budget
6 Capital Program Committee (CPC) Committee Work Plan
Potential CPC Board Board CPC Board CPC Board CPC Board Doc ID Short Title Future 3/28 4/6 5/2 5/23 6/6 8/22 9/5 11/30 12/6 Items 6946 Process and Controls for Capital Program I 6894 FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal A 6945 Reaffirm/Provide New Policy Direction on Remaining A Measure A Projects 6942 Proposed FY20 & FY 21 Capital Budget A A 6805 Policy on Expansion Projects Operating Costs Provision A A 6937 VTA Grant Funding Process for Capital Projects I Preview of Potential Capital Project Scoring Criteria Matrix D* 2000 Measure A Semi-Annual Report I I VTP Highway Program Semi-Annual Report I I 2016 Measure B Semi-Annual Report I * I * Update CPC Charter and Responsibilities In Admin Code A and Board Rules of Procedure Recommended Evaluation Process and Criteria for Staff A Scoring of Proposed Projects 6622 Next Steps in Innovating the Way Silicon Valley Moves D 6623 Potential Value of Dedicated VTA Innovation Fund D 6624 What Does It Mean for VTA to be "Transportation Authority" D
LEGEND: A = Action Item D = Discussion I = Information Item P = Presentation V = Verbal Report * = Proposed
Revised: 3/25/2019