DOCSLIB.ORG

Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 Version 3.0 approved by the Monitoring Committee on 28 September 2011 (updated on 30 November 2011 after EU Commission’s inter-service consultation) Dokumentenversion: 1.0, veröffentlicht 02/2006 Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 Table of contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 10 The joint programming process ........................................................................ 11 Part I: Content provisions ................................................................................ 14 1. The Programme area................................................................................... 14 2. Socio-economic context of the transnational actions .................................. 16 2.1. Territorial potential of the Region.................................................................. 16 2.1.1. Socio-economic conditions ...................................................................... 16 2.1.2. Transport conditions............................................................................... 17 2.1.3. Environmental conditions ........................................................................ 17 2.1.4. Conditions for urban and regional co-operation........................................... 18 2.2. East-West divide ........................................................................................ 20 2.3. Issues of common concern........................................................................... 21 3. Summary of assets and challenges for the development of the Baltic Sea Region .................................................................................................. 25 3.1. SWOT analysis ........................................................................................... 25 3.2. Rationale for transnational actions in the area ................................................ 28 3.2.1. Fostering of innovations.......................................................................... 28 3.2.2. Better accessibility ................................................................................. 29 3.2.3. Effective management of Baltic Sea resources............................................ 30 3.2.4. Making the BSR and its cities and regions more competitive and attractive.... 30 4. Strategy and focus of the Programm........................................................... 32 4.1. Geographical focus ..................................................................................... 35 4.2. Thematic focus........................................................................................... 35 4.3. Transnational and quality focus .................................................................... 37 4.4. Integrating the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument ................ 40 4.5. Strategic projects ....................................................................................... 40 5. Positioning and complementarity of the Programme .................................. 42 5.1. Coherence with EU and national policy frameworks and programmes ................. 42 5.2. Coherence with the Northern Dimension Policy Framework and pan-Baltic strategies .................................................................................................. 45 5.3. Coherence with the EU sector policies............................................................ 47 5.4. Coherence with measures financed by the EAFRD, EFF and ESF......................... 48 5.5. Coherence with other EU-funded programmes for socio-economic development.............................................................................................. 49 6. Priorities of the Programme........................................................................ 54 6.1. Priority 1: Fostering of innovations across the BSR .......................................... 56 2 Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 6.1.1. Orientation............................................................................................ 56 6.1.2. Areas of support .................................................................................... 57 6.1.3. Examples of strategic projects ................................................................. 60 6.2. Priority 2: External and internal accessibility of the BSR ................................... 61 6.2.1. Orientation............................................................................................ 61 6.2.2. Areas of support .................................................................................... 64 6.2.3. Examples of strategic projects ................................................................. 65 6.3. Priority 3: Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource ...................... 65 6.3.1. Orientation............................................................................................ 65 6.3.2. Areas of support .................................................................................... 67 6.3.3. Examples of strategic projects ................................................................. 69 6.4. Priority 4: Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions.................... 69 6.4.1. Orientation............................................................................................ 69 6.4.2. Areas of support .................................................................................... 72 6.4.3. Examples of strategic projects ................................................................. 74 6.5. Priority 5: Technical Assistance..................................................................... 74 6.6. System of indicators for the Programme ........................................................ 75 6.6.1. Structure of the system of indicators ........................................................ 76 6.6.2. Programme level.................................................................................... 78 6.6.3. Project level .......................................................................................... 79 6.6.4. Monitoring and evaluation of the Programme achievements ......................... 80 Part II: Implementing provisions ..................................................................... 86 7. Introduction................................................................................................ 86 8. Bodies implementing the Programme ......................................................... 89 8.1. Monitoring Committee ................................................................................. 89 8.1.1. Tasks of the Monitoring Committee........................................................... 90 8.1.2. Composition of the Monitoring Committee, chairmanship, decision making ..... 92 8.1.3. Rules of procedure of the Monitoring Committee......................................... 93 8.2. National sub-committees ............................................................................. 93 8.3. Managing Authority..................................................................................... 94 8.3.1. Functions of the Managing Authority ......................................................... 94 8.3.2. Designation of the Managing Authority ...................................................... 98 8.4. Certifying Authority..................................................................................... 99 8.4.1. Functions of the Certifying Authority ......................................................... 99 8.4.2. Designation of the Certifying Authority.................................................... 102 8.5. Audit Authority......................................................................................... 103 8.5.1. Functions of the Audit Authority ............................................................. 103 8.5.2. Designation of the Audit Authority .......................................................... 105 8.6. Group of auditors ..................................................................................... 105 8.7. Joint Technical Secretariat ......................................................................... 106 3 Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 8.7.1. Set-up and operation............................................................................ 106 8.7.2. Tasks of the JTS .................................................................................. 107 9. Generation, application and selection of operations.................................. 108 9.1. Lead beneficiaries and other beneficiaries .................................................... 108 9.1.1. Definition of lead beneficiaries and other beneficiaries ............................... 108 9.1.2. Location of lead beneficiaries and other beneficiaries to receive ERDF funding, Norwegian funding or ENPI funding from the Programme............... 109 9.1.3. Norwegian lead beneficiaries administering ERDF funding and ENPI funding from the Programme ............................................................................ 112 9.1.4. Responsibilities of lead beneficiaries and other beneficiaries ....................... 112 9.2. Support for generation and implementation of operations............................... 113 9.2.1. Measures to support generation of operations .......................................... 113 9.2.2. Measures to support implementation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8. References
    8. References BBC News, “US Nato general fears rapid Russian troop deployments.” 20 June, 2016: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36575180, accessed 17 May, 2017. Birkavs, Valdis and Gade, Søren. NB8 Wise Men Report. Riga and Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, August 2010. https://www.utanrikisraduneyti.is/media/Skyrslur/NB8-Wise-Men- Report.pdf, accessed 17 May, 2017. Breitenbauch, Henrik. “Det store nordiske rum: Trump, Putin og geopolitikkens uafvendelighed,” Internasjonal Politikk 75, 3 (2017): 45-51. Breitenbauch, Henrik. “Geopolitical Geworfenheit: Northern Europe After the Post-Cold War,” Journal of Regional Security 10, 2 (2015): 113-133. Breitenbauch, Henrik; Schaub Jr., Gary; Pradhan-Blach, Flemming and Kristensen, Kristian Søby. Get it Together – Smart Defence Solutions to NATO’s Compound Challenge of Multinational Procurement. Copenhagen: Centre for Military Studies, 2013. http://cms.polsci.ku.dk/publikationer/getittogether/Get_it_Together.pdf, accessed 17 May, 2017. Ciocoiu, Paul “Estonia eyes a military Schengen Area,” Balkan Defense, 2 January, 2016: http://www.balkandefense.com/estonia-eyes-a-military-schengen, accessed 17 May, 2017. Conley, Heather. The Enhanced Partnership in Northern Europe (e•PINE). Heather Conley, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. Testimony Before the House Committee on International Relations, Washington, April 21, 2004: https://2001- 2009.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/31684.htm, accessed 17 May, 2017. Danish Presidency of Nordic–Baltic Eight 2015, NB8-Nordic–Baltic Cooperation – Progress Report 2015: http://www.mfa.gov.lv/images/Final_NB8_Progress_Report_2015.pdf, accessed 8 April, 2017. DeGennaro, Patricia. “The Gray Zone and Intelligence Preparation of the Battle Space,” Small Wars Journal (2016) http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-gray-zone-and-intelligence-preparation-of- the-battle-space, accessed 17 May, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning and Governance Within EU Policies and Legislation
    Commission for Territorial Cohesion Policy and EU Budget Spatial planning and governance COTER within EU policies and legislation and their relevance to the New Urban Agenda © European Union, 2018 Partial reproduction is permitted, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available online at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-01-18-497-EN-N; ISBN: 978-92-895-0959-6; doi:10.2863/0251 This report was written by Erich Dallhammer, Roland Gaugitsch, Wolfgang Neugebauer (ÖIR GmbH) and Kai Böhme (Spatial Foresight GmbH). It does not represent the official views of the European Committee of the Regions. Contents Introduction: Competencies and policies 1 Definition and distribution of competences 1 General ways of EU legislation and policies to influence spatial development 2 EU competencies and activities 3 Intergovernmental cooperation 4 Examples of main EU legislation and policies influencing spatialplanning 5 Environmental legislation 6 Legislation in regard to Energy 7 Legislation on competition 9 Maritime spatial planning 9 European Incentives – Cohesion policy and rural development policy 10 Transport policy 12 Intergovernmental cooperation on urban policies 12 Intergovernmental cooperation on spatial planning policies 13 Summary table summarising the EU legislation and policies by spatial planning dimensions 15 Literature 17 Introduction: Competencies and policies In view of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the New Urban Agenda adopted in 2016, this paper aims at providing an overview of legislation and policies on an EU level contributing to selected aspects of those UN declarations in the field of spatial planning and governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Structure, Energy and Planning: Findings from Three Cities in Sweden, Finland and Estonia Große, Juliane; Fertner, Christian; Groth, Niels Boje
    www.ssoar.info Urban Structure, Energy and Planning: Findings from Three Cities in Sweden, Finland and Estonia Große, Juliane; Fertner, Christian; Groth, Niels Boje Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Große, J., Fertner, C., & Groth, N. B. (2016). Urban Structure, Energy and Planning: Findings from Three Cities in Sweden, Finland and Estonia. Urban Planning, 1(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.506 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Urban Planning (ISSN: 2183-7635) 2016, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 24-40 Doi: 10.17645/up.v1i1.506 Article Urban Structure, Energy and Planning: Findings from Three Cities in Sweden, Finland and Estonia Juliane Große *, Christian Fertner and Niels Boje Groth Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.G.), [email protected] (C.F.), [email protected] (N.B.G.) * Corresponding author Submitted: 12 November 2015 | Accepted: 18 February 2016 | Published: 4 March 2016 Abstract Transforming energy use in cities to address the threats of climate change and resource scarcity is a major challenge in urban development. This study takes stock of the state of energy in urban policy and planning and reveals potentials of and constraints to energy-efficient urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing of Kitemill's Airborne Wind Energy System at Lista, Norway
    NNI - Rapport nr. 520 Bergen, november 2018 Tittel: Testing of Kitemill’s Airborne Wind Energy System at Lista, Norway. Assessing the impacts on birds. A pilot study. NNI-Report 520 Forfatter: Prosjektansvarlig: Arnold Håland Zoo-økolog, Cand. real. Arnold Testing of Kitemill’s AirborneHåland, Leder NNI Wind Resources AS Energy SystemProsjektmedarbeider at Lista,: Norway. Assessing ISSN / ISBN: the impacts Arnold Håland on birds. A pilot study. Oppdragsgiver Kitemill AS NNI Resources AS © Postadresse: Postboks 54 NESTTUN, 5852 Bergen. Tlf. + 47 55 17 77 10. E-post: [email protected] På nettet: http://www.nni.no Forside: Grågås A. anser i trekk mot øst, langs søndre avsnitt på Lista flyplass 6. sept 2018. Foto: Arnold Håland. Arnold Håland NNI-Report 520 Bergen, Norway December 2018 NNI Resources AS ISSN: 1504 - 2367 NNI-Report 520 Testing of Kitemill’s Airborne Wind Energy System at Lista, Norway. Assessing the impacts on birds. A pilot study 1 NNI – Report 520 Bergen, december 2018 Tittel: Testing of Kitemill’s Airborne Wind Energy System at Lista, Norway. Assessing the impacts on birds. A pilot study Author: Project leader: Arnold Håland Cand. real. Arnold Håland, Avian Ecologist & CEO NNI Resources AS Fieldwork ana analysis: ISSN / ISBN: Arnold Håland 1504 - 2367 Financing Kitemill AS NNI Resources AS© Address: Paradisleitet 14, 5232 Paradis, Norway. Phone: + 47 55 17 77 10. E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.nni.no Front page: Migrating Greyleg Goose Anser at Lista, Southern Norway. 5. september 2018. Photo: A. Håland. NNI-Report 520 Testing of Kitemill’s Airborne Wind Energy System at Lista, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching the Current Situation of Street Greenery in Latvia's Large Cities
    Proceedings of the Latvia University of Agriculture Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 3, Number 3 Researching the Current Situation of Street Greenery in Latvia’s large cities Maija Jankevica, Daiga Zigmunde, Latvia University of Agriculture Abstract. Street greenery is one of the most important public green spaces that enhance the aesthetic and ecological quality of urban environment. Firstly street greenery helps create a city’s visual image and it provides extra public space and secondly it ecologically links bigger green planting areas (parks, squares, etc.) and improves the microclimate. The aim of the study was to analyse the current situation and characteristics of street greenery in Latvia’s large cities in order to determine the aspects limiting and enhancing aesthetic and ecological quality. Four cities were selected as study objects - Liepaja, Jelgava, Valmiera and Rezekne. Landscape inventory, photo fixation of street greenery, assessment of landscape ecological and aesthetic characteristics and examination of spatial plans of local municipalities were used in the research. The results indicate that street greenery is mainly arranged as street enclosing or bordering elements. They are formed as linear green groups, consisting mostly of trees, grass and hard ground cover. In general landscape ecological and aesthetic characteristics of the street greenery are of low quality and not in mutual accordance. Also the study did not reveal the landscape ecological aesthetic design approach used in the planning of street greenery. Generally, the cities selected for the research pay attention to the regular management and stewardship of street greenery. One of the aspects limiting aesthetic and ecological characteristics of street greenery is the long winter season, city’s extreme conditions, vandalism and underground utilities and communication network in the green zones of the streets, which strongly influence the choice of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-LUPA European Land Use Patterns Applied Research 2013/1/8
    EU-LUPA European Land Use Patterns Applied Research 2013/1/8 VOLUME VI The Øresund Region Case Study Report Part C Scientific report | Version 30/November/2012 1 This report presents the final results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & TECNALIA Research & Innovation, 2012. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. 2 List of authors IGSO, Poland Mariola Ferenc Marcin Mazur Nordregio, Sweden Rasmus O. Rasmusen Ryan Weber 3 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE REGION 3 2. CHARACTERIZATION OF LAND USE AND LAND COVER 6 2.1. Definitions of land use 6 2.2. Surface and structure of land use 7 2.3. Land cover specificity 10 2.4. Protected areas (from environment, military, etc. points of view) 13 2.5. Technical management of land use (infrastructure, drainage systems, etc.) 14 2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Development and Land Use
    Ecosystem Health and Sustainable 3 Agriculture Rural Development and Land Use Editor: Ingrid Karlsson and Lars Rydén CSDCentre for sustainable development Uppsala. Planning, Management and Assessment Spatial Planning and Management 18 Kristina L Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, and Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Lars Rydén Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden The Aim of Spatial Planning This definition sets spatial planning in a broad and interdisciplinary context. Spatial planning challenges in The Origins of Spatial Planning this way the understanding of planning focusing merely Spatial planning refers in short to “the methods used by on land-use planning and on blueprints. Indeed, spatial the public sector to influence the distribution of resourc- planning includes strategy building and is closely inter- es and activities in spaces of various types and scales”. twined with regional and environmental policies. Even Spatial planning includes all levels of land use planning, the term European spatial planning is ambiguous and that is urban and rural planning, regional planning, envi- probably best understood as territorial policy-making on ronmental planning, national spatial plans, and planning European level. on international levels. There are numerous definitions of spatial planning. Developing Methods and Tools of Spatial Planning in One of the earliest comes from the European Regional/ Europe Spatial Planning Charter (often called the ‘Torremolinos Numerous planning systems exist around the world. Charter’), adopted in 1983 by the European Conference of Especially in North-western Europe spatial planning Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT). It has evolved greatly since the time after the Second reads World War. In 1999, the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) was signed by the ministers respon- Regional/spatial planning gives geographical ex- sible for regional planning in the EU member states at a pression to the economic, social, cultural and eco- meeting in Potsdam, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany a Glossary
    STUDIES IN SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT At a time when Europe is growing together, cooperation between countries is becoming increas- 7 ingly necessary. One of the main reasons for pursuing transnational spatial development is to at- tain a common understanding of the facts of spatial planning. Hence, the INTERREG III B project “COMMIN” sought to establish a common communication basis for the exchange of knowledge and experience in spatial planning and thus to foster and develop this understanding in the Baltic Sea region. Therefore, on the basis of a standardized structure the COMMIN project partners prepared basic information about institutional settings and spatial planning systems and compiled a glossary of key terminology in spatial planning accompanied by a varying range of fact sheets with respect to planning cases taken as examples. The readers will now fi nd on www.commin.org the whole range of information covering the respec- tive national languages as well as English translations, although in some countries offi cial transla- tions for these issues were lacking. The project partners were aware of the fact that each translation requires a balancing act between legal precision and communicable classifi cation and, at the end, is a question of defi nition power and of different senses for semantics. The Planning System and The German text on hand (status December 2006) – one information package out of eleven – was prepared by a team comprising planners, lawyers, economists, and administrative academics. Actually no other publication treating this subject in English exists and it will hopefully contribute not only Planning Terms in Germany to understanding planning issues in Europe but also to transferring in this respect information and knowledge within the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Shrinkage in Liepāja
    UPPSATSER FRÅN KULTURGEOGRAFISKA INSTITUTIONEN June 2011 Urban Shrinkage in Liep āja Awareness of population decline in the planning process Kristaps Kaugurs [email protected] Master's Thesis in Urban and Regional Planning, 30 ECTS Supervisors: Eva Andersson and Thomas Borén Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University www.humangeo.su.se KAUGURS, KRISTAPS (2011). Urban Shrinkage in Liepāja: Awareness of population decline in the planning process Urban and Regional Planning, master thesis for master exam in Urban and Regional Planning, 30 ECTS credits, Stockholm University. Supervisors: Eva Andersson and Thomas Borén Language: English Abstract The aim of the study is to investigate the current state of awareness of urban shrinkage in Liepāja by the key actors involved in the planning process. Last couple of hundred years have brought many transformations in urbanity that was always accompanied by the growth of the population and expansion of the city. However, the new patterns of urban development emerged in the last decades all over the globe, causing cities to lose the inhabitants resulting in urban shrinkage. Liepāja, the third largest city in Latvia, has lost a quarter of its population in last two decades and the trend continues. The long-term municipal planning document is being presented during this research in a light of which the research question is asked: “What is the current state of awareness of urban shrinkage in Liepāja by the key actors?” Utilising Flyvbjerg’s phronetic form of inquiry in combination with case study and repeated semi- structured interviews, the dominant planning views related to urban shrinkage are sought and analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/10/2004, Abstracts
    ORAL PRESENTATION PTCOG41 PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS 10 – 13 October 2004 Bloomington Convention Center, Bloomington, IN, USA Table of Contents PTCOG41 Program 2 Abstracts Oral presentations 6 Poster Presentations 44 Oral presentations (cont) 58 Attendee list 74 PTCOG41 Program Bloomington, IN, USA 10 -13 October 2004 Page 1 ORAL PRESENTATION PTCOG41 PROGRAM October 9 - 13, 2004, Bloomington, INDIANA, USA Saturday October 9, 2004 Fall School in basic proton therapy Physics – Coordinator: Dr Jonathan Farr 9:00 - 17:00 Fall School by Bernie Gottschalk @ IUCF Bernie Gottschalk Sunday October 10, 2004 Fall School in basic proton therapy Physics - Coordinator: Dr Jonathan Farr 9:00 - 13:00 Fall School by Bernie Gottschalk @ IUCF Bernie Gottschalk START of PTCOG 41: Registration + Opening at Convention Center 15:00 - 18:00 Registration at the Convention Center Steering Committee meeting; Cook Room at the Bloomington 16:00 - 18:00 Al Smith Convention Center Opening Ceremony + Community Welcome at the 18:00 - 20:00 Bloomington Convention center; Welcoming address by Rob de Cleene Bloomington Mayor Mark Kruzan at 19:00 Monday October 11, 2004 Registration + Breakfast at convention center 7:30 - 9:00 Breakfast + Registration OPENING ADDRESS 9:00 - 9:15 Chair: Dr.Allan Thornton 9:00 - 9:05 Opening address by Mr Mark Long, President IURTC 9:05 - 9:15 Opening address by Dr.Paul Sokol, Director IUCF Session I: CLINICAL ASPECTS 9:15 - 10:25 Chair: Dr.Allan Thornton + Dr.Tom DeLaney 9:15 - 9:45 Partial Breast Irradiations Simon Powell 9:45 - 10:05 LLUMC Breast protocol Leslie Yonemoto 10:05 - 10:25 Current Indications for Proton therapy Allan Thornton 10:25 - 11:00 Tea / Coffee Break Session II: TECHNICAL ASPECTS 11:00 - 12:30 Chair: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Current Heritage Re-Use Policies and Regulations in Europe
    Ref. Ares(2019)7896005 - 23/12/2019 OpenHeritage: Deliverable 1.2 (Report) Mapping of current heritage re-use policies and regulations in Europe Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage re-use December 2019 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766 H2020 PROJECT Grant Agreement No 776766 Project Full Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Title Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment Project OpenHeritage Acronym Grant 776766 Agreement No. Coordinator Metropolitan Research Institute (MRI) Project June 2018 – May 2021 (48 months) duration Project website www.openheritage.eu WP1: Mapping of current heritage re-use policies and Work Package regulations in Europe 1.2 report Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage re-use Deliverable (synthetizes inputs from Tasks 1.1.- 1.3) Delivery Date December 2019 Loes Veldpaus (UNEW); Federica Fava (ROMA3); Dominika Author(s) Brodowicz (SARP) Dóra Mérai (CEU); Nicola Vazzoler, Giovanni Caudo, Mauro Baioni (Roma3); Markus Kip (UBER); Katarzyna Sadowy, (SARP); Iryna Sklokina, Sofia Dyak (CUH); Karim van Contributor(s) Knippenberg (UGENT); John Pendlebury, Sarah Dyer, Hannah Garrow, Bruce Davenport (UNEW); Joep de Roo, Alina Cristiana Tomescu (Eurodite). Reviewer(s) Beitske Boonstra (UGENT) Dissemination Public (PU) X level: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (CO) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project OpenHeritage – Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning in Poland in the Context of 'Inspire
    M. Pluta http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/GLL/2016.4.159 GLL Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape No. 4 • 2016, 159–168 SPATIAL PLANNING IN POLAND IN THE CONTEXT OF ‘INSPIRE’ RULES AND AMENDMENT TO THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT1 Magda Pluta Summary Spatial planning is a vital aspect of social and economic development of a country. Spatial plan- ning in Poland is regulated by the Spatial Planning and Development Act of 27 March 2003 and should be implemented in conformity with the EU Directive Establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). In the study an assessment of the spatial planning system in Poland in the light of existing legislation has been carried out, and a SWOT analysis has been performed, showing the planning’ strengths and weaknesses, oppor- tunities and threats, and the most immediate needs to be met – in the context of amendments currently being drafted – have been indicated. Keywords spatial planning in Poland • INSPIRE • SWOT analysis 1. Spatial planning in Poland according to existing legislative acts Spatial planning is a part of general social and economic planning and is understood as an entirety of institutions, methods and actions ensuring rational management of space [Gawroński 2007]. The existing legislation regulating spatial planning in Poland is the Spatial Planning and Development Act of 27 March 2003 [Dz. U. (Journal of Laws) 2003, Nr 80, poz. 717] together with implementing acts. The Spatial Information Infrastructure Act of 4 March 2010 [Dz. U. 2010 Nr 76, poz. 489] is also worth noting, as it introduces into Polish law the provisions of the Directive 2007/2/EC of The European Parliament of 14 March 2007 ‘Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community’ (INSPIRE).
    [Show full text]