DOCSLIB.ORG

Proto Indo-European (PIE)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proto Indo-European (PIE) LING 322 MIDDLE ENGLSH: LANGUAGE AND CHANGE The road to PROTO INDO EUROPEAN (PIE) The origin of language Problematic Recent work in comparative linguistics suggests that all, or almost all, attested human languages may derive from a single earlier language. Hypotheses of origin Continuity theory: Complexity of language indicates gradual evolution from pre- linguistic systems among early primates Discontinuity theory: Human language is unique and cannot be compared to any non-human system, so language must have appeared fairly suddenly in human evolution Monogenesis: a single proto-language between 200,000 and 50,000 years ago Polygenesis: languages evolved in several lineages independent of one another Complicating factors in the search for origins Time languages develop and change in a variety of ways Diverge Diachronic change Converge Two or more unrelated languages in contact acquire and display similar linguistic features not inherited from their respective proto- languages Replacement Speakers gradually shift to a completely different language Complete loss A crucial part of the language jigsaw is lost : Hittite The First Language Genetic and archaeological evidence suggests that Homo Sapiens originated in and spread from East Africa, so maybe an ancestor of the Khoisan languages, spoken around 50,000 years ago Evidence? The nature of reconstructed proto-languages suggests older languages made more phonological and morphological distinctions than their descendants. Evidence cited includes Khoisan languages have ‘click’ sounds, no language has developed them. Phoneme inventories reduce the further they are from Khoisan languages. East ǃXoon dialect: Non-click consonants Labial Dental Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal Plosive voiced d dz ɡ ɢ ~ ɴɢ tenuis p* t ts k q ʔ voiceless pʰ* tʰ tsʰ kʰ qʰ aspirated voiced aspirated dtʰ dtsʰ ɡkʰ* ɢqʰ ~ (breathy voiced?) (dʱ) (dzʱ) ɴɢqʰ voiceless ejective tʼ* tsʼ kʼ*, kxʼ (?) (qʼ) voiced ejective dtsʼ ɡkxʼ Fricative voiceless f* s x h* Nasal voiced m n ɲ (ŋ) glottalized ˀm ˀn Other (β) (l) (dʲ ~ j) East ǃXoon dialect: Click consonants noisy clicks ‘sharp’ clicks bilabial dental lateral alveolar palatal kʘ kǀ kǁ kǃ kǂ kʘʰ* kǀʰ kǁʰ kǃʰ kǂʰ ɡʘ ɡǀ ɡǁ ɡǃ ɡǂ ɡʘh ɡǀh ɡǁh ɡǃh ɡǂh ŋʘ ŋǀ ŋǁ ŋǃ ŋǂ ŋ̊ ʘ ŋ̊ ǀ ŋ̊ ǁ ŋ̊ ǃ ŋ̊ ǂ ↓ŋ̊ ʘʰ ↓ŋ̊ ǀʰ ↓ŋ̊ ǁʰ ↓ŋ̊ ǃʰ ↓ŋ̊ ǂʰ kʘˀ kǀˀ kǁˀ kǃˀ kǂˀ (kʘʼ?)* ˀŋʘ ˀŋǀ ˀŋǁ ˀŋǃ ˀŋǂ qʘ qǀ qǁ qǃ qǂ (qʘʰ?)* ɢʘ ɢǀ ɢǁ ɢǃ ɢǂ ɢǀh ɢǃh ɢǂh kʘˣ kǀˣ kǁˣ kǃˣ kǂˣ ɡʘx ɡǀx ɡǁx ɡǃx ɡǂx qʘʼ qǀʼ qǁʼ qǃʼ qǂʼ kʘʼqʼ kǀʼqʼ kǁʼqʼ kǃʼqʼ kǂʼqʼ ɡʘqʼ ɡǀqʼ ɡǁqʼ ɡǃqʼ ɡǂqʼ Relatively recent work (i) The word order in the ancestral language was SOV (ii) Except for cases of diffusion, the direction of syntactic change, when it occurs, has been for the most part SOV > SVO and, beyond that, SVO > VSO / VOS with a subsequent reversion to SVO occurring occasionally. Reversion to SOV occurs only through diffusion. (iii) Diffusion, although important, is not the dominant process in the evolution of word order. (iv) The two extremely rare word orders (OVS and OSV) derive directly from SOV. Murray Gell-Mann and Merritt Ruhlen, The origin and evolution of word order PNAS 2011 October, 108 (42) 17290-17295. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113716108 Nostracists and the Nostratic hypothesis In 1903 Holger Pedersen proposed ‘Nostratic’ (< Latin nostrās our countryman’) a common ancestor for Indo-European Finno-Ugric Samoyed Turkish Mongolian Manchu Yukaghir Eskimo Semitic Hamitic Spoken between 15,000 and 12,000 years ago Study picked up by the Russians in the 1960s, and has continued Holger Pedersen elsewhere until now Controversial! Language families included in Nostratic not always agreed on Language families proposed for inclusion in Nostratic vary Nostratic Reconstructions are themselves based on proto-language reconstructions Nostratic English (IPA) /KʼelHæ wetʼei ʕaKʼun kæhla/ Language is a ford through the river of time, /kʼat͡ ɬai palhVkʼV na wetæ/ it leads us to the dwelling of those gone before; /ɕa da ʔakʼV ʔeja ʔælæ/ but he cannot arrive there, /jakʼo pele tʼuba wete/ who fears deep water. Uncertain values: Kʼ could be /kʼ/ or /qʼ/ H could be /h/ or /ħ/ V / ʌ = uncertain vowel. IF you are interested Relatively recent work Allan Bomhard: Toward Proto-Nostratic a new approach to the comparison Ebook of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Allan R Bomhard John C Kerns: The Nostratic macrofamily : a study in Call No. 410 B69 distant linguistic relationship Nostratic Dictionary Aharon Dolgopolsky’s Nostratic Dictionary seems to be widely and freely available on the interweb as a PDF. 45000 years later . Proto-Indo-European (PIE) PIE is not the ‘original’ language, it is not even the earliest form of itself. It is the earliest ‘point’ that the parent language can be identified It has been reconstructed using the comparative method Putative date: 4000 BC (Late Neolithic) At least 1500–2000 years between Proto-Indo-European language and the earliest attested IE language (Hittite) PIE is the most widespread language family, although no direct evidence of it remains. IE SUBGROUPS Subgroup Earliest documents CELTIC 500 AD GERMANIC 500 AD (Gothic) ITALIC 700 BC (Old Latin) GREEK 1500 BC (Mycenean), 800 BC (Homer) ALBANIAN 1500 AD ARMENIAN 500 AD BALTIC 1500 AD SLAVIC 900 AD IRANIAN 600 BC (Avestan) INDIC 1500 BC (Vedic) 800 BC (Classical) TOKHARIAN 700 AD ANATOLIAN 1500 BC (Hittite) Proto-Indo-European Urheimat Broadly agreed stages of development A homeland on the East Ukrainian / South Russian steppes. Spread into Europe, the Middle East, and central Asia Formation of daughter languages PIE ‘Urheimat’ hypotheses Archaeology suggests a group of related populations scattered over a vast homeland. Linguistically, this does not hold up. ‘bee’ and ‘birch’ 4 principle locations suggested: 1. The Pontic Steppes (present day Ukraine) c4100 BC. Supported by archaeology. (Gimbutas, Mallory) 2. Pontic-Caspian c4500-3000 BC. Archaeology agrees with reconstructed Indo-European customs. 3. Central Europe / Balkans c5000 BC. Some archaeological evidence. 4. Anatolia c7000-6000 BC. Archaeology and PIE language reconstruction say too early. PIE Semantics Reconstructed forms reveal a culture with: A patrilineal kinship system Domesticated cattle, sheep, horses and dogs Agriculture and cereal cultivation A climate with winter snow, cold climate vegetation Water transportation Technology; tools, weapons, the plough and solid wheel Polytheistic religion, including a *dyeus ph2tēr Heroic poetry and song lyrics What does this confirm about PIE language? Reconstruction of the consonant system of PIE. Cognate sets Old English Latin Greek Sanskrit FOOT fo:t ped- pod- pa:d- FATHER fæder pater pate:r pitar- SLEEP swefan sopor hypnos svapati OVER, ABOVE ofer super huper upari Correspondence f p p p PIE *p Exercise 1: Old English Latin Greek Sanskrit YOU (Singular) θu:/θe: tu:/te: tu /toi tvam/te THREE θri: tre:s treis trayas TURN weorθan werto: - varta:mi BROTHER bro:θor fra:ter phra:te:r bhra:tar Correspondence θ t t t PIE *t Exercise 2. Old English Latin Greek Sanskrit WHAT? hwæt kwid ti cid FOLLOW saihwan (Gothic) sekwor hepomai sacate LEAVE li:hwan (Gothic) linkwo: leipo: rikta CIRCLE, hwe:ogol kolo: kuklos, cakram WHEEL (‘dwell’) Correspondences hw k(w) p / t / k c / k PIE *kw Lenition placeless stop → affricate → fricative → → no sound approximant spirantization affrication → → debuccalization → elision (deaffrication) → [pɸ] → [ɸ] → [p] or [pʰ] → [pf] → [f] → → [tθ] → [θ] → [h] → (zero) [t] or [tʰ] → [ts] → [s] → [k] or [kʰ] → [kx] → [x] → Note: the change voiceless stop > fricative is more common than voiceless stop > affricate > fricative. PIE Phonology: traditional reconstruction Proto-Indo-European consonants Velar Labial dental labio- Laryngeal palatal plain velar Oral *p (*b) *t *d *ḱ *ǵ *k *g *kʷ *gʷ stops asp. *bʰ *dʰ *ǵʰ *gʰ *gʷʰ Nasal stops *m *n *h₁, *h₂, Fricative *s *h₃ Lateral *l Trill *r Semivowels *y *w Proto Indo-European (PIE) Some vowel Correspondences Gothic Latin Greek Sanskrit PIE IS ist est esti asti *e I ic ego: ego: aham *e EIGHT ahtau okto: okto: astau *o NIGHT nahts nokt- - nakt- *o FROM,AWAY af ab apo apa *a FIELD akrs agr- agros ajras *a MOTHER mo:dor ma:te:r me:te:r ma:tar *a: WIDOW widuwo: widua e:itʰeos vidhava *i YOKE juk jugum zugon yugam *u Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals Most Indo-Europeanists accept some version of laryngeal theory because it simplifies some hard-to-explain sound changes and patterns of alternation that appear in various Indo-European languages. Ferdinand de Saussure first posited influential, but now missing, sounds to explain irregular vowel correspondences. He called them coéfficents sonantiques and wrote them *ə₁ *ə₂ *ə₃ The revelation of Hittite Anatolian languages the only Indo-European languages where laryngeals are attested directly and consistently as consonantal sounds. Otherwise, their presence is inferred by the effects they had on neighbouring sounds. PIE vowels The only proper vowels are /e o a/ These segments are always syllabic. e o a The sonants (j w r l m n) are peculiar in that they are both syllabic (vowels) and consonants, depending on what sounds are adjacent *i and *u phonetically vowels, phonologically they were non-syllabic sonorants. These are sometimes called ‘vocoids’ (a sound made with an open oral cavity such that there is little audible friction in the mouth) Indo-European had eight cases: Nominative (nom.) subject of a finite verb Accusative (acc.) direct object of a verb Genitive (gen.) possessive (N’s and of) Dative (dat.) indirect object Ablative (abl.) movement from something, or the cause of something Vocative (voc.) marks an addressee Locative (loc.) indicates a location Instrumental (inst.) marks a noun used in performing an action Problems Disagreement over reconstructed inflections, because some endings (e.g. the genitive plural) are difficult to reconstruct Dual endings of cases are controversial.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A. Dolgopolsky's Nostratic Dictionary and Afro-Asiatic
    2011 LINGUA POSNANIENSIS LIII (1) doi 10.2478/v10122-011-0008-3 A. Dolgopolsky’s NOSTRATIC DICTIONARY AND AFRO-ASIATIC (SEMITO-HAMITIC) GÁBOR TAKÁCS Abs TRACT : Gábor takács. A. Dolgopolsky’s Nostratic Dictionary and Afro-Asiatic (Semito-Hamitic) . Lingua posnaniensis, vol. Liii (1)/2011. the poznań society for the advancement of the arts and sci- ences. pL issn 0079-4740, isBn 978-83-7654-140-2, pp. 109–119. the monumental comparative dictionary by aharon dolgopolsky (prof. emer. of the University of haifa), long awaited by many specialists interested in the long-range comparison of language families, is here at last, available online since spring 2008.1 what we have here is a life’s work completing more than fifty years’ research. the first online publication will soon be followed by a second revised edition. the present reviewer had the privilege in haifa in december 2008 to be able to assist the author in reviewing the etymological entries with initial *m-. the author is the internationally widely known doyen of this domain, which he established still in moscow in the early 1960s together with the late vladislav illič-svityč (1934–1966). Both of them were working initially and basically in the field of indo-european comparative linguistics. illič-svityč was an expert on Balto-slavonic accentology, while dolgopolsky started his careeer as a researcher of romance philology. But soon, both of them had become familiar with the results of semito-hamitic (recently called afro-asiatic after Greenberg), kartvelian, dravidian, Uralic, and altaic historical linguistics. this had led them to a conviction, that has arisen independently in them, on the relationship of the six so-called nostratic language families enumerated above (in- cluding indo-european).
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Bibliography (PDF)
    COMPLETE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE PUBLICATIONS OF JOSEPH H. GREENBERG This bibliography follows the format of the bibliography published in On language (item 204, 723-37; with emendations) and the corrected supplemental bibliography in Language 78.560-64 (2002). The asterisked items have translations or reprints listed in the appendix to the bibliography. 1940 1. The decipherment of the Ben-Ali Diary, a preliminary statement. Journal of Negro History 25.372-75. 1941 *2. Some aspects of Negro-Mohammedan culture-contact among the Hausa. American Anthropologist 43.51-61. 3. Some problems in Hausa phonology. Language 17.316-23. 1946 *4. The influence of Islam on a Sudanese religion. New York: J.J. Augustin. Pp. ix, 73. 1947 5. Arabic loan-words in Hausa. Word 3.85-97. 6. Islam and clan organization among the Hausa. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 3.193-211. *7. Swahili prosody. Journal of the American Oriental Society 67.24-30. 1948 8. The classification of African languages. American Anthropologist 50.24-30. *9. Linguistics and ethnology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 4.140-47. 10. The tonal system of Proto-Bantu. Word 4.196-208. 11. Review of H. Courlander & G. Herzog, The Cow-tail Switch and other West African tales. Journal of American Folklore 51.99-100. 1949 *12. Hausa verse prosody. Journal of the American Oriental Society 69.125-35. 13. The logical analysis of kinship. Philosophy of Science 16.58-64. *14. The Negro kingdoms of the Sudan. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, 11.126-34. *15. Studies in African linguistic classification: I.
    [Show full text]
  • An Amerind Etymological Dictionary
    An Amerind Etymological Dictionary c 2007 by Merritt Ruhlen ! Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Greenberg, Joseph H. Ruhlen, Merritt An Amerind Etymological Dictionary Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Amerind Languages—Etymology—Classification. I. Title. P000.G0 2007 000!.012 00-00000 ISBN 0-0000-0000-0 (alk. paper) This book is dedicated to the Amerind people, the first Americans Preface The present volume is a revison, extension, and refinement of the ev- idence for the Amerind linguistic family that was initially offered in Greenberg (1987). This revision entails (1) the correction of a num- ber of forms, and the elimination of others, on the basis of criticism by specialists in various Amerind languages; (2) the consolidation of certain Amerind subgroup etymologies (given in Greenberg 1987) into Amerind etymologies; (3) the addition of many reconstructions from different levels of Amerind, based on a comprehensive database of all known reconstructions for Amerind subfamilies; and, finally, (4) the addition of a number of new Amerind etymologies presented here for the first time. I believe the present work represents an advance over the original, but it is at the same time simply one step forward on a project that will never be finished. M. R. September 2007 Contents Introduction 1 Dictionary 11 Maps 272 Classification of Amerind Languages 274 References 283 Semantic Index 296 Introduction This volume presents the lexical and grammatical evidence that defines the Amerind linguistic family. The evidence is presented in terms of 913 etymolo- gies, arranged alphabetically according to the English gloss.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Older Olympians.Key
    The Older Olympians LVV4U1 - GRADE 12 CLASSICAL CIVILIZATION - MR. A. WITTMANN UNIT 2 – LECTURE 4 1 6 children of Kronos and Rhea are the first Olympians… Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Hestia, Hades Aphrodite born of his severed genitals of Uranus 2 God Competence God Competence 1. Zeus Storms 6. Apollo Wisdom 2. Hera Family 7. Artemis Hunt 3. Hestia Hearth 8. Hephaestus Forge 4. Demeter Harvest 9. Athena Knowledge Hades Underworld 10. Ares War 5. Poseidon Sea 11. Hermes Trade 12. Aphrodite Sex 3 Zeus, Lord of the Sky Evolved from Indo-European sky god Dyeus pater (Sky Father) Dyaus pitar (Indian) Dyeus (Iranian) Ju-pitar or Jove (Roman) Tues (Germanic) Sky, high places, thunder/lighting, Bull, eagle, oak, aegis (goat skin) epithets: Nephelegereta (cloud gatherer), Kataibates (descending) 4 5 Zeus, King of Gods & Men Father of all Xenia (guest/host, friendship/ hospitality) Justice, tradition, custom not modern justice heiros gamos sacred marriage with Hera… 1. Uranus + Gaea 2. Kronos + Rhea 3. Zeus + Hera 6 7 Zeus, King of Gods & Men Infidelity with goddess allegorizes the Indo- European male sky god’s triumph over local indigenous female earth goddesses Also illustrates how he organized the natural universe & est. human customs & traditions Metis (cleverness) = Athena (strength and judgment) Themis (established law) = Horae (seasons) Moerae (fates) Eurynomê (Custom) = Eirenê (Peace), Dikê (justice), 3 Graces 8 Zeus, King of Gods & Men Infidelity with mortals explains the origins of heroes & kings Legitimizes local kings and rulering families
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Evolution of Word Order
    The origin and evolution of word order Murray Gell-Manna,1 and Merritt Ruhlenb,1 aSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501; and bDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Contributed by Murray Gell-Mann, August 26, 2011 (sent for review August 19, 2011) Recent work in comparative linguistics suggests that all, or almost man”) and uses prepositions. (Nowadays, these correlations are all, attested human languages may derive from a single earlier described in terms of head-first and head-last constructions.) In language. If that is so, then this language—like nearly all extant light of such correlations it is often possible to discern relic traits, languages—most likely had a basic ordering of the subject (S), such as GN order in a language that has already changed its basic verb (V), and object (O) in a declarative sentence of the type word order from SOV to SVO. Later work (7) has shown that “the man (S) killed (V) the bear (O).” When one compares the diachronic pathways of grammaticalization often reveal relic distribution of the existing structural types with the putative phy- “morphotactic states” that are highly correlated with earlier syn- logenetic tree of human languages, four conclusions may be tactic states. Also, internal reconstruction can be useful in recog- drawn. (i) The word order in the ancestral language was SOV. nizing earlier syntactic states (8). Neither of these lines of inves- (ii) Except for cases of diffusion, the direction of syntactic change, tigation is pursued in this paper. when it occurs, has been for the most part SOV > SVO and, beyond It should be obvious that a language cannot change its basic that, SVO > VSO/VOS with a subsequent reversion to SVO occur- word order overnight.
    [Show full text]
  • Vor Sidur 2006 4/10/08 10:04 AM Page 1 1 1 8 6 - 0 7 6 1 N S S I
    2-Vor sidur 2. tbl. 2007:Vor sidur 2006 4/10/08 10:04 AM Page 1 1 1 8 6 - 0 7 6 1 N S S I 17. árg. 2. tbl. 2008. Útgefandi: Ásatrúarfélagið, Síðumúla 15, 108 Reykjavík Ritstjóri og ábyrgðarmaður: Egill Baldursson — [email protected] Gleðilegt sumar! Sumardaginn fyrsta þann 24. apríl, hittumst við í Öskjuhlíðinni, á lóðinni okkar, og blótum sumri. Helgistundin hefst kl. 15 og að henni lokinni flytjum við okkur yfir í Síðumúlann þar sem börnin verða í góðu yfirlæti Tóta trúðs. — Börnunum verður boðið í pylsugrill- veislu, þeim gefnar sumargjafir og hoppukastali verður á staðnum. Nú er engin afsökun fyrir því að mæta ekki! Um kl. 19 verður seldur matur á 2.200 kr., en börn undir 12 ára aldri fá frítt. Kvæðamannafélagið Bragi skemmtir gestum. Mikilvægt er að greiða aðgöngumiðana tímanlega inn á reikning félagsins (reikn. 0101-26-011444, kt. 680374-0159) svo hægt sé að panta matinn af einhverri nákvæmni . Einnig verður hægt að kaupa miða við innganginn á 3.000 kr., en fjöldi slíkra miða hlýtur að tak- markast við innkeypt magn matar. Félagsmenn eru hvattir til að fjöl - menna og taka með sér utanfélagsgesti. Góða skemmtun! 1 2-Vor sidur 2. tbl. 2007:Vor sidur 2006 4/10/08 10:04 AM Page 2 Bergþórssaga Fimmtudaginn (Þórsdaginn) 20. mars, í blaðinu 24 Stundir , birtist stutt og athyglis- verð grein um bók, sem gefin var út árið 1950 af tilraunafélaginu Njáll. Í bókinni, er nefnist Bergþórssaga og er sögð skrifuð eftir frásögnum framliðinna, segja persónur úr Njálssögu sína hlið á sögunni, sem er töluvert öðruvísi en sú sem við höfum lesið hingað til.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative-Historical Linguistics and Lexicostatistics
    COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS AND LEXICOSTATISTICS Sergei Starostin COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS AND LEXICOSTATISTICS [This is a translation, done by I. Peiros and N. Evans, of my paper "Sravnitel'no-istoričeskoe jazykoznanie i leksikostatistika", in "Lingvističeskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejšaja istorija Vostoka", Moscow 1989. I have introduced, however, a number of modifications into the final English text — basically rewritten it again, since the English version needs English examples and etymologies, not Russian ones.] The last two decades have witnessed a fundamental advance in the techniques of comparative linguistic research. A prolonged period of comparative work with a wide range of language families has laid the foundation for the study of genetic relationships between remotely related languages or language groups. The first step in this direction was taken by V.M. Illich-Svitych in his seminal work 'Towards a comparison of the Nostratic languages' in which, with a combination of rigorous methods and intuitive flare, he begins to demonstrate the relatedness of a number of languages of the Old World. This new level of comparative studies appears completely legitimate. In fact, if we take the theory of language divergence as axiomatic, we have to concede the fact that from around the sixth millenium B.C. to the first millenium B.C. there was quite a number of different reconstructable proto-languages throughout the world. Once the level of reconstruction of various proto-languages is improved, the question inevitably arises: are any of these proto-languages genetically related and, if so, can we prove this relationship? To the first part of this question we must now answer in the affirmative.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Semitic and Afroasiatic Linguistics Five Teaching Modules at Addis Ababa University, March 10–14, 2014 1
    Recent developments in Semitic and Afroasiatic linguistics Five teaching modules at Addis Ababa University, March 10–14, 2014 1. Why is a broader Afroasiatic perspective useful for the study of Semitic March 10, 2014 Lutz Edzard, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg and University of Oslo 1 Introductory remarks: internal classification Even though the topic of this introductory chapter is not genealogical sub- grouping per se, it may be useful to briefly consider both the inner structure of Semitic, which, at least from a synchronic perspective, is by now more or less uncontroversial, and the wider structure of the Afroasiatic1 macro-family, whose inner structure continues to be under discussion. Leaving aside the question of a Semitic Urheimat, which is still highly controversial, one has sug- gested models based on shared innovations or isoglosses such as the one on the following page. Faber (1997: 6), taking up and developing proposals inter alia by Hetzron (1976), Goldenberg (1977), and Huehnergard (1990), provides a model based on the following list of basic isoglosses: – East Semitic is characterized by the development of an adjectival ending -ūt (pl. m.) and by the dative suffixes -kum and -šum; – West Semitic is characterized by the suffix conjugation denoting past tense (as opposed to the Akkadian stative) and a prohibitive negator ʾal; – “Central Semitic” is characterized by a series of pharyngealized consonants, a prefix conjugation without gemination of the second root consonant and the leveling of prefix vowels in this conjugation,
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Harold Greenberg
    JOSEPH HAROLD GREENBERG CORRECTED VERSION* Joseph H. Greenberg, one of the most original and influential linguists of the twentieth century, died at his home in Stanford, California, on May 7th, 2001, three weeks before his eighty-sixth birthday. Greenberg was a major pioneer in the development of linguistics as an empirical science. His work was always founded directly on quantitative data from a single language or from a wide range of languages. His chief legacy to contemporary linguistics is in the development of an approach to the study of language—typology and univerals—and to historical linguistics. Yet he also made major contributions to sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, phonetics and phonology, morphology, and especially African language studies. Joe Greenberg was born on May 28th, 1915, in Brooklyn, New York, the second of two children. His father was a Polish Jew and his mother, a German Jew. His father’s family name was originally Zyto, but in one of those turn-of-the- century immigrant stories, he ended up taking the name of his landlord. Joe Greenberg’s early loves were music and languages. As a child he sat fascinated next to his mother while she played the piano, and asked her to teach him. She taught him musical notation and then found him a local teacher. Greenberg ended up studying with a Madame Vangerova, associated with the Curtis Institute of Music. Greenberg even gave a concert at Steinway Hall at the age of 14, and won a city-wide prize for best chamber music ensemble. But after finishing high school, Greenberg chose an academic career instead of a musical one, although he continued to play the piano every evening until near the end of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Macro-Areal Linguistics
    DOI: 10.11649/sm.2015.004 Slavia Meridionalis 15, 2015 Instytut Slawistyki PAN Corinna Leschber Institute for Linguistic and Cross­Cultural Studies in Berlin Implications of Macro-Areal Linguistics While working on difficult etymologies of Balkan words, a repeating pat­ tern can be observed regarding the geographical occurrence of formally and semantically similar words. Archaic terminology in the Balkans shows roots bearing widespread and deep­level connections with an intensive time depth. We have tried to show this by means of the example of the widespread root *mand-, as in mandra, as pointed out by Leschber (2011), which has cognates in Romance and Iberian languages, in German languages, in the Balkan languages, in Greek and Turkish, and in Sanskrit. See the Nostratic root *mand- in Dolgopolsky (2008, pp. 1338–1339, No. 1318) *mAǹ(V) “herd, herd animals”, further attested in the Hamito­Semitic, Ugric and Altaic languages, and in Dravidian languages as manda, mandi, mande “herd, flock of sheep or goats, cattle herd, herd of buffaloes”. Bomhard (2008, p. 48) agrees with the findings on this reconstructed root. *mokor- The Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Languages (Трубачев, 1992, pp. 115–119) proposes an interrelationship between the Slavic *mogyla, “tumulus”, The work has been prepared at author’s own expense. Competing interests: no competing interests have been declared. Publisher: Institute of Slavic Studies PAS. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 PL License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/), which permits redistribution, commercial and non­ ­ commercial, provided that the article is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Depth in Historical Linguistics”, Edited by Colin Renfrew, April
    Time Depth 1 Review of “Time Depth in Historical Linguistics”, edited by Colin Renfrew, April McMahon, and Larry Trask Brett Kessler Washington University in St. Louis Brett Kessler Psychology Department Washington University in St. Louis Campus Box 1125 One Brookings Drive St. Louis MO 63130-4899 USA Email: [email protected] FAX: 1-314-935-7588 Time Depth 2 Review of “Time Depth in Historical Linguistics”, edited by Colin Renfrew, April McMahon, and Larry Trask Time depth in historical linguistics. Ed. by Colin Renfrew, April McMahon, and Larry Trask. (Papers in the prehistory of languages.) Cambridge, England: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2000. Distributed by Oxbow Books. 2 vol. (xiv, 681 p.) paperback, 50 GBP. http://www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk/Publications/Time-depth.htm This is a collection of 27 papers, mostly presentations at a symposium held at the McDonald Institute in 1999. Contributions focus on two related issues: methods for establishing absolute chronology, and linguistic knowledge about the remote past. Most papers are restatements of the authors’ well-known theories, but many contain innovations, and some do describe new work. The ideological balance of the collection feels just left of center. We do not find here wild multilateral phantasms, reconstructions of Proto-World vocabulary, or idylls about pre-Indo-European matriarchal society. Or not much. These are mostly sober academics pushing the envelope in attempts to reason under extreme uncertainty. One of the recurrent themes was that the development of agriculture may drive the expansion of language families and therefore imply a date for the protolanguage. Colin Renfrew describes his idea that that is what happened in the case of Indo-European (IE): PIE was introduced into Europe at an early date, perhaps 8,000 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • "Evolution of Human Languages": Current State of Affairs
    «Evolution of Human Languages»: current state of affairs (03.2014) Contents: I. Currently active members of the project . 2 II. Linguistic experts associated with the project . 4 III. General description of EHL's goals and major lines of research . 6 IV. Up-to-date results / achievements of EHL research . 9 V. A concise list of actual problems and tasks for future resolution. 18 VI. EHL resources and links . 20 2 I. Currently active members of the project. Primary affiliation: Senior researcher, Center for Comparative Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities (Moscow). Web info: http://ivka.rsuh.ru/article.html?id=80197 George Publications: http://rggu.academia.edu/GeorgeStarostin Starostin Research interests: Methodology of historical linguistics; long- vs. short-range linguistic comparison; history and classification of African languages; history of the Chinese language; comparative and historical linguistics of various language families (Indo-European, Altaic, Yeniseian, Dravidian, etc.). Primary affiliation: Visiting researcher, Santa Fe Institute. Formerly, professor of linguistics at the University of Melbourne. Ilia Publications: http://orlabs.oclc.org/identities/lccn-n97-4759 Research interests: Genetic and areal language relationships in Southeast Asia; Peiros history and classification of Sino-Tibetan, Austronesian, Austroasiatic languages; macro- and micro-families of the Americas; methodology of historical linguistics. Primary affiliation: Senior researcher, Institute of Slavic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow / Novosibirsk). Web info / publications list (in Russian): Sergei http://www.inslav.ru/index.php?option- Nikolayev =com_content&view=article&id=358:2010-06-09-18-14-01 Research interests: Comparative Indo-European and Slavic studies; internal and external genetic relations of North Caucasian languages; internal and external genetic relations of North American languages (Na-Dene; Algic; Mosan).
    [Show full text]