Raber Associates Consultants in the Historical and Social Sciences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Raber Associates Consultants in the Historical and Social Sciences RABER ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS IN THE HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CONSERVATIVE INNOVATORS AND MILITARY SMALL ARMS: AN INDUSTRIAL HISTORY OF THE SPRINGFIELD ARMORY, 1794-1968 prepared for: U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service North Atlantic Regional Office 15 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3572 August 1989 This report is made pursuant to Contract No. CX1600-5-0019. The amount charged to the Department of Interior, National Park Service, for the work resulting in this report (inclusive of the amount so charged for any prior reports submitted under this contract) is $44,888.00. The names of the persons employed or retained by the Contractor, with managerial or professional responsibility for such work, or for the contents of the report are as follows: Michael S. Raber Patrick M. Malone Robert B. Gordon Carolyn C. Cooper 81 Dayton Road • P.0. Box 46 South Glastonbury • CT 06073 (203) 633-9026 Edited 2006 by Richard Colton, Historian Springfield Armory NHS One Armory Sq., Suite 2 Springfield, MA 01105-1299 1 This report is perhaps best described as a case study in American industrial history, treating the Springfield Armory as a very unusual factory system. Through most of its history, the Armory had one customer and one principal job: to supply the U.S. Army with reliable, powerful shoulder arms. In this role, Springfield's longstanding—if uneven—federal funding through many economic crises, the peculiarities of Army small arms demands, and, perhaps, the power of Armory workers in shop management all contrast with the histories of most private industries. If unusual, however, the Armory was hardly irrelevant or tangential to the development of American industry, especially prior to the Civil War. Historians have long recognized this government factory's central place in economic and industrial history, and if anything have often overstated the case. The lack of any comprehensive study of Springfield Armory has therefore been something of a gap in that history, a gap which we are bridging—although not filling--with this report. As a research subject, the Armory is better characterized as an abyss than a gap. When closed in 1968, the Armory was probably the longest continuously-operated industrial facility in the United States, with a history of over 170 years, and had generated enormous quantities of paperwork and artifacts which remained available for study. Here again, government management practices were unusual among antebellum American industries, leaving Springfield as one of the best-documented factories of the period. In the 20th century, the growth of Army and other government bureaucracy accelerated the generation of documents, to such an extent that detailed study of events after 1945 is often an act of self-immolation. Our first debts as authors are to the very few scholars who have previously emerged intact from prolonged exposure to Springfield Armory data with useful, if partial, monograph treatments of Armory history. Without their works, it is doubtful we could have completed this one in any reasonable period of time. Given the difficulties in editing the results of immersion in thousands of letters and reports, it is probably no accident that some of these works have never been published. Derwent Whittlesey's 1920 dissertation mastered the complexities of Armory political history and local controversies through the Civil War. Constance Green, during her employment at Springfield as a historian during World War II, combined documentary and informant research to produce a more comprehensive manuscript chronicling Armory history through the Civil War, and from 1919 to 1944. Edward Ezell has spent much time during the past twenty-five years finding the story of post-1945 rifle development in the thicket of Army paperwork and the memories of those most 2 directly involved, eventually producing an excellent book. Merritt Roe Smith's widely-recognized books and articles since the early 1970s on Harpers Ferry Armory, the Ordnance Department, and 19th-century small arms makers have included extensive use of Springfield Armory correspondence. Finally, Felicia Deyrup's pioneering 1948 publication on pre-1870 Connecticut Valley arms makers relied heavily on Armory records, and proved extremely pertinent to our final selection of topics and issues. The National Park Service's principal objective in contracting for this study was coverage of the entire period of Armory operation, and assessment of Springfield's place in American industrial and military history. Given the wealth of Armory data and the Park Service's available resources, we had to make careful decisions on the scope and organization of this report while meeting this objective. In following the story of how the Armory's industrial practices met Army Ordnance Department requirements, we have largely ignored its role in local and regional economics, politics, and social organization. Although partially treated in the work of Whittlesey, Green, and Deyrup, and in some local histories such as Michael Frisch's, the Armory's place in the Springfield region has never been thoroughly analyzed, and to have done so would have pulled us onto a largely separate and very long research path. Somewhat similarly, we have made only preliminary attempts to trace or define the Armory's influence on private American industry, since the availability of pertinent, detailed comparative studies or case histories remains limited. It is clear from our work, however, that the military demand for interchangeable small arms led to a factory system of enormous but very specialized strengths, with less widespread applicability than sometimes believed. Our conclusions here agree with those of Donald Hoke's 1984 dissertation, but the subjects of both the Springfield region and the Armory's influences are still very open ones for ambitious researchers. As to how we have concentrated our efforts, two decisions were paramount: organization of the report, and selection of research material. After considering a combination of chronological and interpretative chapters, we opted for a more thematic or topical approach, corresponding in part to how we had to unravel the Armory as an industrial system. Each major aspect of Armory operations--physical plant development, materials management, organization of labor, mechanization and manufacturing, and research and development—appears in a separate chapter (Chapters 4-8) covering the entire period 1794-1968. To explain why these operations took their particular historical forms, chapters 2 and 3 discuss military demands, the weapons which were the 3 Armory's principal products, and the extraordinary emphasis on making these weapons inter- changeable. Chapter 1 throws a chronological net over all these topics, to capture a more unified picture and guide the reader through the following seven chapters. Following our version of what the Armory actually did, and why it was done, chapters 9 and 10 offer summary interpretations of Springfield's place in American economic and military history. We recognize that this approach necessarily creates some redundancies in presentation, although long-term trends in Armory operations sometimes appear more clearly this way. Of equal importance, it became clear that, since effective use of a largely chronological organization would have required the same assimilation of the principal topics, we would have had to write this report twice. We will, in fact, try it again the other way, but as a separate published book. In selecting research material, our basic approach was to assemble what was already available on our topics, identify what was missing or less than convincing, and fill in the gaps with primary research. In addition to the works of the authors already mentioned, there are hundreds of books, articles, and unpublished papers pertaining to Springfield Armory. Collectively, we read most of them. We rechecked original correspondence cited in the works of Whittlesey, Green, and our colleague Merritt Roe Smith as needed, but only made new ventures into the mass of these traditional primary sources for information on poorly documented points. Since letters and government reports rarely told us what was actually happening in Armory shops, we relied on more direct sources. The availability of detailed work returns and payrolls, extremely rare among 19th century American factories, gave us itemized data on the organization and productivity of Armory workers. We also used material evidence, in the form of finished weapons, unfinished parts, and gages, available at the Springfield Armory Museum, the National Museum of American History, and some private collections. The artifacts, which included weapons made at other public and private armories, provided many new insights into the ways Springfield armorers actually made their weapons, the extent to which their work reflected Armory standards of interchangeable manufacture, and the relative quality of their work among contemporary arms makers. Many of our more original conclusions emerged directly from use of the accounting data and the artifacts, suggesting the wide range of sources and approaches needed in industrial history or archaeology. Budgetary constraints, copyright problems, and Park Service priorities have limited some other approaches which would otherwise have improved our presentation. Even with the alteration or removal of some Armory buildings since 1968, there is clearly much to be learned from 4 more detailed inspection of surviving
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: __Kalorama Park____________________________________________ Other names/site number: Little, John, Estate of; Kalorama Park Archaeological Site, 51NW061 Name of related multiple property listing: __N/A_________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __1875 Columbia Road, NW City or town: ___Washington_________ State: _DC___________ County: ____________ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Trend of Country Made/Improvised Pistols Used In
    orensi f F c R o e l s a e n r a r u c Waghmare et al. J Forensic Res 2012, S1 o h J Journal of Forensic Research DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.S1-003 ISSN: 2157-7145 Research Article Open Access Modern Trend of Country Made /Improvised Pistols Used in the Capital of India Waghmare NP*, Suresh R, Puri P ,Varshney KC, Anand V, Kompal and Anubha Lal Forensic Science Laboratory, NCT of Delhi, Madhuban Chowk, Sector-14, Delhi-110085, India Abstract Now a days crimes relating to firearms and ammunition have dramatically increased in northern part of India. It has been observed that Country made pistols of 8mm/.315” bore; Improvised pistols of 7.65mm/9mm calibre, .32”/.38” calibre are randomly used by criminals in Delhi and NCR regions. On the basis of crime cases received in the Forensic Science Laboratory for examination, the smooth bore illegal country made firearms chambered for pistol, revolver and rifle cartridges are very often encountered in criminal cases all over India and other developing countries. The possibility of identifying types of smooth bore firearms of country made and improvised pistols has been studied. On analysis of crime cases received for forensic examination, it has been found that 75% crimes are committing by 8mm/.315” calibre by country made pistols, 20% by 7.65mm calibre/bore improvised pistols and remaining 5% crime by other firearms like 12 bore country made pistol, .32”/.38” calibre/bore improvised pistols. In present study, firearms details relating to length of barrel, total length of firearms, internal diameter of barrel at muzzle end and breech end have been studied in view of forensic significance and may be useful for Forensic scientists, Law Enforcement Agencies, Police Officers and Judicial Officers etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Policy and Procedures
    Sons of the American Revolution Color Guard Safety Policy and Procedures Purpose The purpose of this document is to establish standardized Safety Policy and Procedures for the National Society, Sons of the American Revolution to be adopted by the National, State and Chapter Color Guards to promote uniformity for multi-state events and to facilitate the acquisition of liability insurance coverage for the Color Guard. State Societies may in their discretion adopt more stringent standards if desirable or required by the laws of their state. Policies A. Insurance: 1. All chapter and/or state societies that have compatriots firing weapons shall have a liability insurance policy that covers events at which Black Powder is fired. 2. All liability insurance policies obtained by a Chapter or State shall name the respective State Society and National Society as additional insureds. B. Training: 1. Before carrying a weapon at an SAR event, all compatriots will be trained in the safe handling of that weapon even if they are not firing. 2. Any compatriot who will be firing shall be additionally trained in the safe operation and firing of their firearm. 3. The recognized standards for training shall be (1) the National Park Service Manual of Instruction for the Safe Use of Reproduction Flintlock Rifles & Muskets in Interpretive Demonstrations (1/21/2010), (2) the NRA NMLRA Basic Muzzle Loading Shooting Course or (3) an equivalent training course taught by an instructor who has been certified by the appropriate State Color Guard Commander. If the color guardsman receives training from an outside source such as the NRA or NPS, the State Color Guard Commander or his designee will examine the color guardsman for familiarity with SAR uses of a firelock and provide additional training as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property
    NFS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multipler Propertyr ' Documentation Form NATIONAL This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ____Iron and Steel Resources of Pennsylvania, 1716-1945_______________ B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________ ~ ___Pennsylvania Iron and Steel Industry. 1716-1945_________________ C. Geographical Data Commonwealth of Pennsylvania continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, J hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requiremerytS\set forth iri36JCFR PafrfsBOfcyid the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature of certifying official Date / Brent D. Glass Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL FIREARMS - CONSTRUCTION KIT - DATA SHEET Firearms FILENAME DESCRIPTION Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 0M.Wav CANNON STEEL 4 Gauge
    Historical HISTORICAL FIREARMS - CONSTRUCTION KIT - DATA SHEET Firearms FILENAME DESCRIPTION Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 0m.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Microphone attached to cannon. 6 Shots. Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 25m.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. A/B omni directional microphones in medium distance. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 15m.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. A/B hyper cardioidd microphone in medium distance, pointing towards muzzle. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 3m.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Flanking shooter left and right, omnidirectional microphones, close. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 5m Rear.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. XY cardioid microphones, medium distance behind shooter, pointing in shooting direction. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 75m.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Mono omnidirectional large diaphragm microphone, close to bullet impact spot. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 100m A.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Mono omnidirectional microphone, far distance, left side. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 100m B.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Mono omnidirectional microphone, far distance, right side. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 30m Indirect.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge. Fired in stone pit into open landscape. Mono shotgun microphone, medium distance, pointing away from gun into forest. 6 Cannon 4 Gauge Steel 25m Rear.wav CANNON STEEL 4 gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • Garand Collectors Association Journal - Spreadsheet Search Created and Maintained by Eric A
    Garand Collectors Association Journal - Spreadsheet Search Created and Maintained by Eric A. Nicolaus - Email: [email protected] A B C D E F G H 1 Journal Issue Month / Year First Key Word or Phrase Second Key Word or Phrase Third Key Word or Phrase Fourth Key Word or Phrase Fifth Key Word or Phrase Sixth Key Word or Phrase 2 35-2-3 Spring 2021 Fake M82 Telescope Reproductions Sold By SARCO Logo Block - M82 Versus Fake M82 Fakes So Far in 40,000 Number Range Table of Fakes Versus Actual M82 3 35-2-9 Spring 2021 Not Your Typical McCoy Garand DonMcCoy Match-Conditioned Garand Beretta Mfg Danish Gevaer 50 or GV/50 PB Numbering on Parts DonMcCoy's Trigger Signature See Also Spring 2012 Article 4 35-2-11 Spring 2021 More Than a Rifle Combat Stories Told Thru An M1 Garand Joe Drago Combat Experiences 22 Stories Spanning Europe / Pacific Actual Soldier Accounts 5 35-2-13 Spring 2021 Birthday Rifles IHC w/LMR Barrel IHC Gap Letter w/ Month and Year Greek Return Rifles Shooting the CMP Games 6 35-2-15 Spring 2021 The EM-62 Garand Erquiaga Arms Company EMFA-62 Erquiaga Modified Full Auto Model 62 M14 / FN/FAL Magazine Numerous Comparison Pics 7 35-2-19 Spring 2021 Marine Corps Official Accounts M1 Garand at Iwo Jima Climate Conditions Impact on Performance Malfunctions / AP Ammunition M7 Grenade Launcher Headstone Marker 8 35-2-25 Spring 2021 GCA Rifle Teams National Matches at Camp Perry Matches Run at 50% Capacity Many Unknowns Guidelines and Changes Website for National Matches 9 35-2-27 Spring 2021 GCA Rifle Teams Assignments and
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual
    User’s guide for: MUZZLELOADING FIREARMS Official Sponsor ATTENTION: BEFORE REMOVING THE FIREARM FROM ITS PACKAGE READ & UNDERSTAND WARNINGS AND FULL INSTRUCTIONS AND PRECAUTIONS IN THIS OWNER’S MANUAL Owner’s Manual – MUZZLE LOADING FIREARMS CHIAPPA FIREARMS Chiappa Firearms is the brand new trade mark representing the arms manufacturers group of the Chiappa’s Family (founders of Armi Sport in far 1958) that reunite two brands leaders in their fields: ARMI SPORT: Producing perfectly working replicas of muzzle loading and breech loading firearms, with a complete and appreciated product line from American Independence War models to the mythical Lever Action rifles of epic Western era. KIMAR: Producing blank firing and signal pistol, air guns and defence guns. The two brands attend the internat ional markets from many years, especially Armi Sport that is knew by most exigent shooters, collectors and by the most important shooting and historical associations from all over the world, for the reliability, th e safety, the fidelity to the original models, the artisan finishing accuracy and the optimum quality price report of all their models. From the beginning of 2007 the Group gave an official mark to the own presence on the American market founding the CHIAPPA FIREARMS Ltd, with a convenient location in Dayton (Ohio) can provide better assistance to the distributors of Armi Sport and Kimar products throughout the USA . So CHIAPPA FIREARMS will be the brand new logo for the distribution and the guarantee protection of Armi Sport and Kimar products in the world and it’ll warrant the flexibility production and the research applied to the technical resource that have permitted in the last years the constant and continuing expansion of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • University Micrdfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.62×51Mm NATO 1 7.62×51Mm NATO
    7.62×51mm NATO 1 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO rounds compared to AA (LR6) battery. Type Rifle Place of origin United States Service history In service 1954–present Used by United States, NATO, others. Wars Vietnam War, Falklands Conflict, The Troubles, Gulf War, War in Afghanistan, Iraq War, Libyan civil war, among other conflicts Specifications Parent case .308 Winchester (derived from the .300 Savage) Case type Rimless, Bottleneck Bullet diameter 7.82 mm (0.308 in) Neck diameter 8.77 mm (0.345 in) Shoulder diameter 11.53 mm (0.454 in) Base diameter 11.94 mm (0.470 in) Rim diameter 12.01 mm (0.473 in) Rim thickness 1.27 mm (0.050 in) Case length 51.18 mm (2.015 in) Overall length 69.85 mm (2.750 in) Rifling twist 1:12" Primer type Large Rifle Maximum pressure 415 MPa (60,200 psi) Ballistic performance Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy 9.53 g (147 gr) M80 FMJ 833.0 m/s (2,733 ft/s) 3,304 J (2,437 ft·lbf) 11.34 g (175 gr) M118 Long 786.4 m/s (2,580 ft/s) 3,506 J (2,586 ft·lbf) Range BTHP Test barrel length: 24" [1] [2] Source(s): M80: Slickguns, M118 Long Range: US Armorment 7.62×51mm NATO 2 The 7.62×51mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 7.62 NATO) is a rifle cartridge developed in the 1950s as a standard for small arms among NATO countries. It should not to be confused with the similarly named Russian 7.62×54mmR cartridge.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIC MILITARY RIFLES: the Mauser Model 1898
    July 09 Blue Press Section 2 5/13/09 11:35 AM Page 40 40 CLASSIC MILITARY RIFLES: The Mauser Model 1898 “The basic design principles of the Model 1898 are even By John Marshall today beimeterng increments util fromiz e400d to 2000in meters, sp andorttreaty.ing In 1933,and Mauser military/policeintroduced a new rifle, the ed on the left sniper side of the stock. Mostrifles.” rifles incorpo- It may be the most classic military rifle of all was rugged enough for battle. The action itself “Gewehr fur Deutsche Reichpost.” This was osten- rated a circular metal plate with a central hole on time. Most military historians will tell you that the was exceedingly strong and well suited for the sibly for the German post office, but it was under- the right side of the stock. This was an aid in disas- best contender for that honor should probably go powerful 7.92mm (8mm) Mauser round it han- stood that this rifle would be the prototype for a sembling the bolt’s striker mechanism. A number to the German Mauser Model 1898. It set the stan- dled. It was found, however, that the long barrel new standard German rifle for the Wehrmacht. In of K98ks were equipped with telescopic sights for dard for both military and civilian turnbolt designs was unwieldy in the trenches and so the short- 1934, the Heereswaffenamt, or Army Weapons use by snipers and these special weapons proved for well over a century. It was used by Germany barreled Karabiner 98a was conceived and man- Office, announced its intention to equip all of its very effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Odyssey: the George W
    ASAC_Vol98_02-Jones_080006.qxp 2/13/09 12:05 PM Page 18 98/18 Reprinted from the American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin 98:18-30 Additional articles available at http://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/resources/articles/ ASAC_Vol98_02-Jones_080006.qxp 2/13/09 12:05 PM Page 19 Confederate Odyssey: The George W. Wray Jr. Collection at the Atlanta History Center By Gordon L. Jones Photos by Jack W. Melton, Jr. He was a very private man who lived in an ordinary house in suburban Atlanta. He loved his family, friends, and the University of North Carolina Tar Heels. But his real pas- sion was Confederate history. He was George W. Wray Jr., well-known for his keen eye for detail, encyclopedic knowledge of weaponry, and penchant for making a bargain. Beginning at the age of twelve in 1948, Wray spent the next fifty-six years building a world-class collection of one thousand Confederate artifacts, including 184 longarms, virtually all known varieties of Confederate bayonets, seven rare Confederate artillery pieces, handguns, uniforms, headgear, flags, swords, knives, ammunition, and accoutrements. Along the way, he spent thousands of hours meticulously tracking down the original public through text, videos, and interactive exhibits, owners of attributed artifacts, building “womb to tomb” Turning Point is firmly rooted in artifacts and the stories biographies of their lives, complete with photographs and they tell—both individually and collectively. Perhaps more family histories. He filled up fourteen file boxes with arti- important still, the acquisition of the Wray Collection will cles, notes, and copies of all his research correspondence, greatly enhance our capacity to serve students, researchers, making his collection one of the best documented in the and collectors by providing an accessible and permanent ref- nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Department Item Quantity Barrington Police Department
    Police Department Item Quantity Barrington Police Department M16A1 Rifle 5 M16 Rifle 5 M14 Rifle 3 Rear Sight 3 Binoculars 5 Telescope 4 Sight Mounts 5 Utility Truck 2 Brushguard Kit 2 Air HM1 Filter 3 Spectacles Set, Ball 25 Burrillville M16A1 Rifle 2 M14 Rifle 3 Infrared Viewer 1 NVS Ranger M995sight 2 Charlestown M16A1 Rifle 2 M14 Rifle 3 Utility Truck 1 Coventry M16A1 Rifle 8 M14 Rifle 4 Bolt Carrier 5 Gun Cover 6 Magazine Cartridge 432 Bipod HK33 Rifle 8 Adaptor Rail Knights Armor MT 40 Barrel Assembly 12 Cartridge Receiver 21 Flash Suppressor 30 Gun Silencer Cover 6 Suppressor Small Arms Weapon 44 Carrier Assembly Kits 12 Rail Adaptor Weapon 12 5.56 MM Rifle Conversion Kit 12 Upper Receiver 12 Upper Reciever & Barrel Assembly 12 Folding Bipods 20 Carbine Grip 24 Mount Site Small Arms 6 Mod Kit Carbine 5 Trigger Assembly 10 Bolt Assembly 8 Tube Shotgun Magazine 12 Heat Shield Assembly 12 M84 Charging Handle 44 Magazine Release 24 Adaptor Rail Weapon 52 Tactical Tripod Kit 7 Gun Mount 6 Gun Silencer 10 Sight Holo 16 Night Scope 3 Night Vision Scope 15 Upper Telescope 1 Reflex Sight 51 Telescope Straight 3 Scope Assembly 2 Articulated Telescope 6 Laser Sight Surefire 7 M14 Mount Assembly 4 Marcbot Robot 1 Utility Truck 3 Vehicular Radiator Shield 1 Armor Radiator Plate 2 Vehicular Door 17 Vehicular Body Panel 11 Vehicular Window 7 Vehicular Windshield 4 Full Armor MAK Kit 1 LH Undercarriage 1 RH Undercarriage 1 4 Door MAK Armor HMMWV 1 4 Door Assembly Kit 1 Windshield Parts Kit 1 Frag2 Parts Kit 1 EAP Frag Kit 1,2,5 1 Supplemental
    [Show full text]