George Washington (1732–1799)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

George Washington (1732–1799) George Washington (1732–1799) George Washington, first president of the illiam Dunlap’s pastel portrait of George Washington United States, earned the epithet Father is remarkable as the earliest-known painting by a of His Country for his great leadership, both in the fight for independence and in man better known for his invaluable publication unifying the new nation under a central History of the Rise and Progress of the Arts of Design government. Washington was born in in the United States (1834), the first attempt to Westmoreland County, Virginia, and chronicle the art of this country. The painting survived (despite damage worked as a surveyor in his youth. In W 1752 he inherited a family estate, Mount by fire while it resided in San Francisco) for more than 150 years in Vernon, upon the death of a half brother, the possession of the Van Horne family, its authenticity affirmed by Lawrence. Washington’s military career began in 1753, when he accepted an Dunlap himself. In 1838, near the end of his life, Dunlap wrote a state- appointment to carry a warning to French ment confirming his authorship of the Senate’s Washington pastel, briefly forces who had pushed into British terri- describing the circumstances of the sitting. Equally conclusive, and more tory in the Ohio valley. In subsequent military assignments, Washington distin- compelling, is the story of the portrait’s origin included in his autobi­ guished himself against the French, first ography—already published in his Rise and Progress. while aiding General Edward Braddock Having received meager training in art from the American painter and later as commander-in-chief of all Virginia militia. William Williams, Dunlap embarked on his youthful career in 1782 by In 1758 Washington returned to executing portraits in “crayons” (pastels) of his father, other relatives, civilian life as a gentleman-farmer at and friends. In the autumn of 1783, he visited Rocky Hill, New Jersey, Mount Vernon and soon took a seat in the Virginia house of burgesses. As a planter, home of John Van Horne. General Washington’s temporary headquarters Washington had firsthand knowledge of was nearby while Congress was convening at Princeton College, and the economic restrictions being imposed by Washington was a frequent visitor to the Van Horne home, so Dunlap Britain, and as a Virginia legislator, he 1 supported political efforts to curtail British “was of course introduced to him.” The young artist had made pastel control of the colonies. Washington was portraits of Mr. and Mrs. Van Horne, and Washington praised them selected to serve as a delegate to the first (“doubtless the mere wish to encourage youth,” according to Dunlap). and second Continental Congresses, and in June 1775 he was chosen to command As a result, Dunlap recalled, John Van Horne “requested him to sit to the American forces. He successfully led me and he complied. This was a triumphant moment for a boy of the Continental army through eight difficult seventeen...but it was one of anxiety, fear and trembling.”2 years of war for independence. In 1783, after the Revolution, Wash- Although family tradition maintains that Dunlap’s portrait of ington resigned his military commission to Washington was executed at the Van Horne estate, Dunlap’s very specific, Congress at Annapolis, Maryland. Recog- detailed, and charming reminiscence differs: nizing the need for a strong central govern­ ment, he served as president of the federal My visits were now frequent to head quarters.... The soldiers [at headquarters] were convention charged with drafting the New-England yeomen’s sons, none older than twenty; their commander was Captain Constitution. Reluctantly, he accepted the Howe.... I was astonished when the simple Yankee sentinels, deceived by my fine will of his colleagues to become president clothes, saluted me as I passed daily to and fro; but Captain Howe’s praise of my portrait of the new nation, and he was inaugurated in New York City on April 30, 1789. of the general appeared to me as a thing of course, though surely he was as much deceived Contending with the ideological struggles as his soldiers. I was quite at home in every respect at head quarters... [to be] noticed within the government, and with hostilities as the young painter, was delicious. The general’s portrait led to the sitting of the lady between France and Great Britain, Wash- [Martha Washington]. I made what were thought likenesses, and presented them to ington greatly feared the growth of political Mr. and Mrs. Van Horne, taking copies for myself.3 386 United States Senate George Washington William Dunlap (1766–1839) Pastel on paper, ca. 1783 1 1 25 ⁄2 x 19 ⁄2 inches (64.8 x 49.5 cm) Unsigned Gift of Anne Middleton Ellis in memory of her husband, Augustus Van Horne Ellis, 1940 Accepted by the Joint Committee on the Library, 1940 Cat. no. 31.00015 Catalogue of Fine Art 387 George Washington —continued parties and the dangers of foreign involve­ It would be pleasant to report that the portrait was as fine as the ment. These issues impelled him to serve a praise bestowed on the young man’s work, but, in fact, it is labored and second term as president. His attempts to solve foreign relations awkward. The Continental army uniform (despite evident effort) is mostly issues during his second term resulted in unconvincing, from the odd abstraction of the ruffled shirtfront to the Jay’s Treaty (1794), a vain attempt to reg­ epaulets that look more like strands from an old mop. Still, to his credit, ulate trade and settle boundary disputes with Great Britain, and the Pinckney Dunlap manages to render Washington’s prominent and idiosyncratic nose Treaty (1795), which successfully settled with success, and the eye sockets are smoothly modeled. One spatial such issues with Spain. Washington also problem—the viewer’s uncertainty that a neck lies behind the neck cloth— acted vigorously to enforce federal authority by quashing the Whiskey may well be due to the fact that Dunlap had lost the sight of his right Rebellion, during which liquor producers eye in a childhood accident. This loss “prevented all further regular in western Pennsylvania threatened the schooling,” and Dunlap also believed that “either from nature or the above new republic by rebelling against an unpopular excise tax on whiskey. accident, I did not possess a painter’s eye for colour; but I was now Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address devoted to painting as a profession, and I did not suspect any deficiency.”4 to the nation emphasized the need for a It is much more likely that his spatial perception, rather than his color unified federal government and warned against party faction and foreign influence. perception, was altered. Although often subjected to harsh criticism But there is no need to belabor the shortcomings of a teenager’s by his contemporaries, Washington suc­ portrait of the most famous man of his day. Dunlap was his own severest ceeded in giving the new government dignity. He saw a federal financial system critic. Early in his artistic career, Dunlap had gone to London to study firmly established through the efforts of with American neoclassical painter Benjamin West. On his return, he Alexander Hamilton, and he set valuable established himself as a portrait and miniature painter, while also working precedents in the conduct of the executive office. Washington retired to Mount Vernon, as a theatrical manager. He later painted large allegorical and religious where he died on December 14, 1799. pictures, similar to those of Benjamin West. Looking back from old age to his early painting career, Dunlap wrote, “I now intend to show the causes that, at the age of twenty-three, and after a long residence in London, left me ignorant of anatomy, perspective, drawing, and colouring, and returned me home a most incapable painter.”5 In addition to painting, Dunlap spent time as a militia paymaster, was one of the founders of the National Academy of Design in New York City, and was involved in civic and cultural affairs throughout his lifetime. He remarked at one time, “The good artist who is not a good man, is a traitor to the arts, and an enemy to society.”6 In 1926 Augustus Van Horne Ellis wrote to Charles Fairman, curator for the architect of the Capitol, about the youthful Dunlap’s “crayon por­ trait” of General George Washington from life, which had been handed 388 United States Senate down through his family. The two men corresponded over the next 11 years, discussing the possible gift of the portrait to the U.S. government. Not until after Ellis’s death, however, was the painting accepted by the Joint Committee on the Library as a gift to the “Senate branch of the Capitol” from Anne Middleton Ellis in memory of her husband. Artist William Dunlap executed this self- portrait around 1812. (Yale University Art Gallery, Gift from the estate of Geraldine Woolsey Carmalt) Catalogue of Fine Art 389 George Washington —continued n 1795, at the age of 17, Rembrandt Peale painted a life portrait of George Washington during the president’s second term. This rare opportunity had been arranged by Rembrandt’s father, Charles Willson Peale, who had already painted Washington from life more often than any other artist. While the elder Peale painted beside Ihim (“to calm my nerves”), Rembrandt created a rivetingly realistic head of the president.1 For the sittings with Washington, the Peales alternated with portraitist Gilbert Stuart—the Peales painted Washington one day and Stuart, the next. The younger Peale was never fully satisfied with his resulting life portrait, though he soon produced 10 copies from it.
Recommended publications
  • Creating a French Enemy in the United States During the 1790S Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis Hervé-Thomas Campangne Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/408 DOI: 10.4000/angles.408 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Hervé-Thomas Campangne, « Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/408 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/angles.408 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States... 1 Cannibals, Monsters and Weasels: Creating a French Enemy in the United States during the 1790s Quasi-War and the 2003 Iraq War Diplomatic Crisis Hervé-Thomas Campangne 1 Countless U.S. presidents and leaders, including Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, have reminded Americans that France is their country’s “oldest ally” (Riché 2013; Seelow 2013; Obama 2015; Serhan 2017). Likewise, many a French official has underscored the unwavering and “natural” quality of the commitment between France and the United States (De Gaulle 1965; Mitterrand 1984; Macron 2018). Yet political scientists and historians often point to the cyclical nature of French-American relations (Duroselle 1978; Bozo and Parmentier 2007: 545).
    [Show full text]
  • D4 DEACCESSION LIST 2019-2020 FINAL for HLC Merged.Xlsx
    Object ID Object Name Brief Description Donor Reason Comments Process Date Box Barcode Pallet 496 Vase Ornamental vase Unknown Redundant 2/20/2020 54 1975-7 Table, Coffee Unknown Condition 12/12/2019 Stables 1976-7 Saw Unknown Redundant 12/12/2019 Stables 1976-9 Wrench Unknown Redundant 1/28/2020 C002172 25 1978-5-3 Fan, Electric Baer, John David Redundant 2/19/2020 52 1978-10-5 Fork Small form Anderson, Helen Redundant 12/12/2019 C001523 14 1978-10-7 Fork Barbeque fork Anderson, Helen Redundant 12/12/2019 C001523 14 1978-10-9 Masher, Potato Anderson, Helen Redundant 12/12/2019 C001523 14 1978-10-16 Set, Dishware Set of "Bluebird" dishes Anderson, Helen Condition 11/12/2019 C001351 7 1978-11 Pin, Rolling Grantham, C. W. Redundant 12/12/2019 C001523 14 1981-10 Phonograph Sonora Phonograph Co. Unknown Redundant 2/11/2020 1984-4-6 Medicine Dr's wooden box of antidotes Fugina, Jean Condition 2/4/2020 42 1984-12-3 Sack, Flour Flour & sugar sacks, not local Hobbs, Marian Relevance 1/2/2020 C002250 9 1984-12-8 Writer, Check Hobbs, Marian Redundant 12/3/2019 C002995 12 1984-12-9 Book, Coloring Hobbs, Marian Condition 1/23/2020 C001050 15 1985-6-2 Shirt Arrow men's shirt Wythe, Mrs. Joseph Hills Condition 12/18/2019 C003605 4 1985-11-6 Jumper Calvin Klein gray wool jumper Castro, Carrie Condition 12/18/2019 C001724 4 1987-3-2 Perimeter Opthamology tool Benson, Neal Relevance 1/29/2020 36 1987-4-5 Kit, Medical Cardboard box with assorted medical tools Covenant Women of First Covenant Church Relevance 1/29/2020 32 1987-4-8 Kit, Surgical Covenant
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 the FEDERALIST ERA
    Unit 3 THE FEDERALIST ERA CHAPTER 1 THE NEW NATION ..........................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON— THE MEN AND THEIR PHILOSOPHIES .....................6 CHAPTER 3 PAYING THE NATIONAL DEBT ................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 4 ..............................................................................................................................................................16 HAMILTON, JEFFERSON, AND THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF THE UNITED STATES.............16 CHAPTER 5 THE WHISKEY REBELLION ........................................................................................................20 CHAPTER 6 NEUTRALITY AND THE JAY TREATY .....................................................................................24 CHAPTER 7 THE SEDITION ACT AND THE VIRGINIA AND KENTUCKY RESOLUTIONS ...........28 CHAPTER 8 THE ELECTION OF 1800................................................................................................................34 CHAPTER 9 JEFFERSONIANS IN OFFICE.......................................................................................................38 by Thomas Ladenburg, copyright, 1974, 1998, 2001, 2007 100 Brantwood Road, Arlington, MA 02476 781-646-4577 [email protected] Page 1 Chapter 1 The New Nation A Search for Answers hile the Founding Fathers at the Constitutional Convention debated what powers should be
    [Show full text]
  • Essay Exhibit and Book Review
    Essay Exhibit and Book Review: The PealeFamily: Creation of a Legacy 1770-1870, Lillian B. Miller, Editor (New York: Abbeyville Press, 1996, $65.00). Traveling Exhibit: Philadelphia Museum of Art (November 1996-Janu- ary 1997); M. H. DeYoung Museum, San Francisco (January-April 1997); Corcoran Gallery, Washington, D. C. (April-July, 1997). Phoebe Lloyd DepartmentofArt History, Texas Tech University In her forward to The Peale Family: Creationofa Legacy, 1770-1870, Ann Van Devanter Townsend raises the question "how would the academic com- munity refer to this important body of scholarship for years to come?" Townsend is President of The Trust for Museum Exhibitions, a nonprofit organization that sponsored the book and Peale family exhibition at three host museums. As Trust President and initiator of the exhibitions, Townsend may well pon- der. Her leading players, Lillian B. Miller, Sidney Hart, and David C. Ward, are not trained art historians. Their crossover from cultural and social history to art history reveals how different the disciplines are and how inapplicable the expertise of the social historian can be. Part of what is lacking in this enterprise of exhibition-cum-text is accountability: to the primacy of the im- age; to the established methodologies of art history; to the kind of scholarly apparatus that substantiates an attribution. Even where the two disciplines should coalesce, there is a lack of accountability: to the bare bones of historical fact, to the Peale family's primary source material stored in the vault at the American Philosophical Society; to the intellectual property of others and in- cluding the work done by those who garnered the footnote information for the now four-volume The Selected Papers of Charles Wil/on Peale, of which Miller is editor.
    [Show full text]
  • 132 Portraits by Gilbert Stuart. in 1914
    132 Portraits by Gilbert Stuart. PORTRAITS BY GILBERT STUART NOT INCLUDED IN PREVIOUS CATALOGUES OF HIS WORKS. BY MANTLE FIELDING. In 1914 the '' Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography" published a list of portraits painted by Gilbert Stuart, not mentioned in the "Life and Works of Gilbert Stuart" by George C. Mason. In 1920 this was followed in the same periodical by "Addenda and Corrections" to the first list, in all adding about one hundred and eighty portraits to the original pub- lication. This was followed in 1926 by the descriptive cata- logue of Stuart's work by the late Laurence Park, which noted many additions that up to that time had eluded the collectors' notice. In the last two years there have come to America a number of Stuart por- traits which were painted in England and Ireland and practically unknown here before. As a rule they differ in treatment and technique from his work in America and are reminiscent more or less of the English school. Many of these portraits lack some of the freedom and spirit of his American work having the more careful finish and texture of Eomney and Gainsborough. These paintings of Gil- bert Stuart made during his residence in England and Ireland possess a great charm like all the work of this talented painter and are now being much sought after by collectors in this country. No catalogue of the works of an early painter, how- ever, can be called complete or infallible and in the case of Gilbert Stuart there seems to be good reason to believe that there are still many of his portraits in Portraits by Gilbert Stuart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Martha Washington
    Name _______________ Class _____ Date ______ The Death of Martha Washington BACKGROUND Martha Washington passed away at Mount Vernon on May 22, 1802 at the age of 70 following an illness that lasted several weeks. At the time of her death she was surrounded by her grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Newspapers around the country eulogized her as “the worthy partner of the worthiest of men.” This obituary appeared in the Augusta Herald, published in Georgia, on June 9, 1802. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Source: Martha Washington’s Obituary from the Augusta Herald, Augusta, Georgia, June 9, 1802. (Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association) Life Guard Teacher Fellowship Created Materials mountvernon.org George Washington Teacher Institute VOCABULARY eulogy: a formal speech that praises a person who has died Part 1: Contextualizing the Source 1. When was this source created? ____________________________ Who created it? ___________________ 2. Who is this document about? _________________________________________________________________ 3a. Is this a primary or secondary source? Explain your thinking. _______________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 3b. What type of source is this? _________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and Soldiers in the Siege of Yorktown
    Citizens and Soldiers in the Siege of Yorktown Introduction During the summer of 1781, British general Lord Cornwallis occupied Yorktown, Virginia, the seat of York County and Williamsburg’s closest port. Cornwallis’s commander, General Sir Henry Clinton, ordered him to establish a naval base for resupplying his troops, just after a hard campaign through South and North Carolina. Yorktown seemed the perfect choice, as at that point, the river narrowed and was overlooked by high bluffs from which British cannons could control the river. Cornwallis stationed British soldiers at Gloucester Point, directly opposite Yorktown. A British fleet of more than fifty vessels was moored along the York River shore. However, in the first week of September, a French fleet cut off British access to the Chesapeake Bay, and the mouth of the York River. When American and French troops under the overall command of General George Washington arrived at Yorktown, Cornwallis pulled his soldiers out of the outermost defensive works surrounding the town, hoping to consolidate his forces. The American and French troops took possession of the outer works, and laid siege to the town. Cornwallis’s army was trapped—unless General Clinton could send a fleet to “punch through” the defenses of the French fleet and resupply Yorktown’s garrison. Legend has it that Cornwallis took refuge in a cave under the bluffs by the river as he sent urgent dispatches to New York. Though Clinton, in New York, promised to send aid, he delayed too long. During the siege, the French and Americans bombarded Yorktown, flattening virtually every building and several ships on the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was George Washington?
    Book Notes: Reading in the Time of Coronavirus By Jefferson Scholar-in-Residence Dr. Andrew Roth Who was George Washington? ** What could be controversial about George Washington? Well, you might be surprised. The recently issued 1776 Project Report [1] describes him as a peerless hero of American freedom while the San Francisco Board of Education just erased his name from school buildings because he was a slave owner and had, shall we say, a troubled relationship with native Americans. [2] Which view is true? The 1776 Project’s view, which The Heritage Foundation called “a celebration of America,” [3] or the San Francisco Board of Education’s? [4] This is only the most recent skirmish in “the history wars,” which, whether from the political right’s attempt to whitewash American history as an ever more glorious ascent or the “woke” left’s attempt to reveal every blemish, every wrong ever done in America’s name, are a political struggle for control of America’s past in order to control its future. Both competing politically correct “isms” fail to see the American story’s rich weave of human aspiration as imperfect people seek to create a more perfect union. To say they never stumble, to say they never fall short of their ideals is one sort of lie; to say they are mere hypocrites who frequently betray the very ideals they preach is another sort of lie. In reality, Americans are both – they are idealists who seek to bring forth upon this continent, in Lincoln’s phrase, “government of the people, by the people, for the people” while on many occasions tripping over themselves and falling short.
    [Show full text]
  • Artists` Picture Rooms in Eighteenth-Century Bath
    ARTISTS' PICTURE ROOMS IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BATH Susan Legouix Sloman In May 1775 David Garrick described to Hannah More the sense of well­ being he experienced in Bath: 'I do this, & do that, & do Nothing, & I go here and go there and go nowhere-Such is ye life of Bath & such the Effects of this place upon me-I forget my Cares, & my large family in London, & Every thing ... '. 1 The visitor to Bath in the second half of the eighteenth century had very few decisions to make once he was safely installed in his lodgings. A well-established pattern of bathing, drinking spa water, worship, concert and theatre-going and balls meant that in the early and later parts of each day he was likely to be fully occupied. However he was free to decide how to spend the daylight hours between around lOam when the company generally left the Pump Room and 3pm when most people retired to their lodgings to dine. Contemporary diaries and journals suggest that favourite daytime pursuits included walking on the parades, carriage excursions, visiting libraries (which were usually also bookshops), milliners, toy shops, jewellers and artists' showrooms and of course, sitting for a portrait. At least 160 artists spent some time working in Bath in the eighteenth century,2 a statistic which indicates that sitting for a portrait was indeed one of the most popular activities. Although he did not specifically have Bath in mind, Thomas Bardwell noted in 1756, 'It is well known, that no Nation in the World delights so much in Face-painting, or gives so generous Encouragement to it as our own'.3 In 1760 the Bath writer Daniel Webb noted 'the extraordinary passion which the English have for portraits'.4 Andre Rouquet in his survey of The Present State of the Arts in England of 1755 described how 'Every portrait painter in England has a room to shew his pictures, separate from that in which he works.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1973
    Annual Report 1973 National Gallery of Art 1973 ANNUAL REPORT National Gallery of Art Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 70-173826. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. 20565. Cover photograph by Barbara Leckie; photographs on pages 14, 68, 69, 82, 88, inside back cover by Edward Lehmann; photograph on 87 by Stewart Bros; all other photographs by the photographic staff of the National Gallery of Art, Henry B. Seville, Chief. Nude Woman, Pablo Picasso, Ailsa Mellon Bruce Fund Woman Ironing, Edgar Degas, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon CONTENTS 9 ORGANIZATION 11 DIRECTOR'S REVIEW OF THE YEAR 25 APPROPRIATIONS 26 CURATORIAL ACTIVITIES 26 Acquisitions and Gifts of Works of Art 50 Lenders 52 Reports of Professional Departments 7 5 ADVANCED STUDY AND RESEARCH 77 NATIONAL PROGRAMS 79 REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATOR 79 Employees of the National Gallery of Art 82 Attendance 82 Building Maintenance and Security 83 MUSIC AT THE GALLERY 87 THE EAST BUILDING THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART The Chief Justice, The Secretary of State, The Secretary of the Warren E. Burger William P. Rogers Treasury, George P. Shultz The Secretary of the Paul Mellon, President John Hay Whitney. Smithsonian Institution, Vice-President S. Dillon Ripley Lessing J. Rosenwald Franklin D. Murphy ORGANIZATION The 36th annual report of the National Gallery of Art reflects another year of continuing growth and change. Although technically established by Congress as a bureau of the Smithsonian Institution, the National Gallery is an autonomous and separately administered organization and is governed by its own Board of Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • August 6, 2003, Note: This Description Is Not the One
    Tudor Place Manuscript Collection Martha Washington Papers MS-3 Introduction The Martha Washington Papers consist of correspondence related to General George Washington's death in 1799, a subject file containing letters received by her husband, and letters, legal documents, and bills and receipts related to the settlement of his estate. There is also a subject file containing material relating to the settlement of her estate, which may have come to Tudor Place when Thomas Peter served as an executor of her will. These papers were a part of the estate Armistead Peter placed under the auspices of the Carostead Foundation, Incorporated, in 1966; the name of the foundation was changed to Tudor Place Foundation, Incorporated, in 1987. Use and rights of the papers are controlled by the Foundation. The collection was processed and the register prepared by James Kaser, a project archivist hired through a National Historical Records and Publications grant in 1992. This document was reformatted by Emily Rusch and revised by Tudor Place archivist Wendy Kail in 2020. Tudor Place Historic House & Garden | 1644 31st Street NW | Washington, DC 20007 | Telephone 202-965-0400 | www.tudorplace.org 1 Tudor Place Manuscript Collection Martha Washington Papers MS-3 Biographical Sketch Martha Dandridge (1731-1802) married Daniel Parke Custis (1711-1757), son of John Custis IV, a prominent resident of Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1749. The couple had four children, two of whom survived: John Parke Custis (1754-1781) and Martha Parke Custis (1755/6-1773). Daniel Parke Custis died in 1757; Martha (Dandridge) Custis married General George Washington in 1759and joined him at Mount Vernon, Virginia, with her two children.
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Army: Valley Forge Encampment
    REFERENCES HISTORICAL REGISTRY OF OFFICERS OF THE CONTINENTAL ARMY T.B. HEITMAN CONTINENTAL ARMY R. WRIGHT BIRTHPLACE OF AN ARMY J.B. TRUSSELL SINEWS OF INDEPENDENCE CHARLES LESSER THESIS OF OFFICER ATTRITION J. SCHNARENBERG ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION M. BOATNER PHILADELPHIA CAMPAIGN D. MARTIN AMERICAN REVOLUTION IN THE DELAWARE VALLEY E. GIFFORD VALLEY FORGE J.W. JACKSON PENNSYLVANIA LINE J.B. TRUSSELL GEORGE WASHINGTON WAR ROBERT LECKIE ENCYLOPEDIA OF CONTINENTAL F.A. BERG ARMY UNITS VALLEY FORGE PARK MICROFILM Continental Army at Valley Forge GEN GEORGE WASHINGTON Division: FIRST DIVISION MG CHARLES LEE SECOND DIVISION MG THOMAS MIFFLIN THIRD DIVISION MG MARQUES DE LAFAYETTE FOURTH DIVISION MG BARON DEKALB FIFTH DIVISION MG LORD STIRLING ARTILLERY BG HENRY KNOX CAVALRY BG CASIMIR PULASKI NJ BRIGADE BG WILLIAM MAXWELL Divisions were loosly organized during the encampment. Reorganization in May and JUNE set these Divisions as shown. KNOX'S ARTILLERY arrived Valley Forge JAN 1778 CAVALRY arrived Valley Forge DEC 1777 and left the same month. NJ BRIGADE departed Valley Forge in MAY and rejoined LEE'S FIRST DIVISION at MONMOUTH. Previous Division Commanders were; MG NATHANIEL GREENE, MG JOHN SULLIVAN, MG ALEXANDER MCDOUGEL MONTHLY STRENGTH REPORTS ALTERATIONS Month Fit For Duty Assigned Died Desert Disch Enlist DEC 12501 14892 88 129 25 74 JAN 7950 18197 0 0 0 0 FEB 6264 19264 209 147 925 240 MAR 5642 18268 399 181 261 193 APR 10826 19055 384 188 116 1279 MAY 13321 21802 374 227 170 1004 JUN 13751 22309 220 96 112 924 Totals: 70255 133787 1674 968 1609 3714 Ref: C.M.
    [Show full text]