DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—Senate S8109

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

December 18, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8109 little attention then and is even less the Hispanic community and shared Mahalo, my friend, until we meet remembered now. the community’s hopes and aspira- again. My colleagues, DANNY’S speech tions. In recent conversations, I know f should be required reading today given from his comments that he understood RECESS the recent tragedies. It was just last the growing importance of the Hispanic week that I was asked to speak on Sen- community and the benefit of advanc- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under ator INOUYE’s behalf at an event con- ing their interests within American so- the previous order, the Senate stands cerning the proposed Eisenhower Me- ciety. He lived it, he understood it, he in recess until 2:15 p.m. morial. It is a joint bipartisan effort knew. Thereupon, the Senate, at 12:33 p.m., that has taken far too long to bring to We worked together on the recogni- recessed until 2:15 p.m. and reassem- fruition. In the cloakroom the day be- tion of Filipino veterans—something bled when called to order by the Pre- fore we had one of our many discus- he was very passionate about—and he siding Officer (Mr. WEBB). sions where he grabbed my hand and thanked me most graciously, as al- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- looked me in the eye and said: You and ways, for my interest and for my com- ator from Maryland. I probably vote differently 80 percent of mitment to working with him on an f the time, but in all of our mutual ef- issue so dear to his heart. EXTENSION OF MORNING These are just a few stories of a man forts and all of our travels, I have con- BUSINESS sidered you a brother. who led a quintessentially American I didn’t know what to do. I responded life. I know there are thousands more Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, I ask with a tear in my eye, and I said: I love stories to be told, some of which have unanimous consent to extend morning you, DANNY INOUYE. already been told on the Senate floor, business until 3 p.m., with Senators And he said: I love you too. but the real story is that this was a permitted to speak therein for up to 10 What a wonderful thing to hear from man who sacrificed for his country, minutes each. a true American hero in every respect. met the challenges it presented, but ul- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without It has been a privilege and an honor to timately, because of a kind heart and objection, it is so ordered. serve with such a remarkable and truly loyalty to the ideals we profess as The Senator from Texas. humble man. Americans, he became one of the most f I also want to thank his wonderful important, yet most humble, leaders in REMEMBERING DANIEL K. INOUYE staff in working with my staff on so the U.S. Senate. many mutual projects. Senator INOUYE and his life and deeds Mrs. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, I Aloha, my dear friend. I will miss remind us what it means to be an rise this sad day to comment on the you every day. American hero, a war hero who carried passing of a great patriot, Senator I yield back the remainder of my the burden of his service with him all DANIEL INOUYE. He fought for his coun- time. of his life. His courage, his patriotism, try as part of the Greatest Generation The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- and his respect for the values he fought and served his State with distinction ator from New Jersey. for informed his views and his votes in for more than 50 years. Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, I ask this Chamber. We were all honored to know him and unanimous consent to speak for 5 min- The Senate is sadly diminished today blessed by his sacrifice in defense of utes. with the passing of one of our most re- American freedom. We served together The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without spected and iconic leaders—a hero, a on the Armed Services Committee and objection, it is so ordered. powerful voice for reason, rationality, later on the Appropriations Committee Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, and common sense when reason, ra- as well. DANNY’S insight was invaluable there are few times in the history of tionality, and common sense are too to our Nation’s defense and military this institution when one Senator, a often in short supply. He will be missed policy. He did make America stronger. singularly iconic leader, comes along not only by all of us who had the privi- I had the pleasure of working with and reminds us of what it means to be lege to serve with him but by a nation him when we traveled together to Bos- a U.S. Senator and what it means to that needs more leaders like him. nia to visit our troops in the very early represent the very best of what this We, all of us, remember his lasting stages of that conflict. We later went Nation stands for and to do it, as he al- influence, his way of making us look to the Middle East on a CODEL with ways did, with the utmost dignity, into the heart of the matter without Senator Stevens as well. One of the pic- honor, pride, and integrity. prejudice or preconceived political im- tures in my office is of Senator Ste- I am deeply saddened to have to pressions. He knew how to get to the vens, Senator INOUYE, Senator SNOWE, speak to the passing of a true Amer- crux of an issue, and he led the way so and myself in our helmets and flak ican hero. He was someone who in- many times for the rest of us. We fol- jackets the first time we flew into Sa- spired so many of us in the Senate. His lowed his lead, and the Nation is better rajevo in the early 1990s, when the ideals and sense of justice were always for it. Serbs had still been shooting from the on display. All of us who worked with him as hills into the airport. The passing of Senator INOUYE leaves chairman of the Appropriations Com- In 1995, on the 50th anniversary of the a painful void in the leadership of this mittee respected his word and his com- end of World War II, Senator INOUYE body. In so many ways, the life and mitment to fairness. He was always and a number of other World War II sacrifice of Senator INOUYE embodies willing to listen, always willing to hear veterans gathered at the Smithsonian the essence of the ‘‘greatest genera- your side, always willing to reach out to reminisce about their time in battle. tion.’’ across the aisle for what he believed Senator INOUYE recalled the morning Even when faced with the suffering, was right. of December 7 at Pearl Harbor, when he indignity, and humiliation of an in- Most recently, he was the voice of recognized that the men in the Japa- ternment camp, he did not allow his support and wisdom in our efforts to nese planes looked like him, and he heart to be turned or his love and com- secure disaster relief for my home said he knew then his life would never mitment to his country to be dimin- State of New Jersey. He empathized be the same. ished. Justice was a constant theme in with the needs of New Jerseyans, just As soon as the Army permitted Japa- his life. He represented the challenges as he addressed the needs of Hawaiians nese Americans to volunteer, he signed faced by his Hawaiian people since for decades. There is no more gracious up and ventured to the mainland of the statehood, when he became its first man than DAN INOUYE, no one who was United States for the first time in his representative in the U.S. Congress. as dignified and respectful than the life. He and his fellow Hawaiians of We had a close bond when it came to senior Senator from Hawaii. Japanese descent worried about how our concern for minorities in our coun- Our thoughts and prayers go out to they would be treated in the United try. Because of the struggles in his life, his wife and his family and to the peo- States but, as he recalled it, they en- he understood the struggles in both of ple of Hawaii today. We have lost an countered kindness and respect at our communities. He felt a kinship to incredibly great man. every stop their train made. VerDate Mar 15 2010 01:52 Dec 19, 2012 Jkt 029060 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G18DE6.021 S18DEPT1 tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with S8110 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE December 18, 2012 By the time he finished his training Medal of Honor for their heroism dur- more accomplished as a public servant, and prepared to depart for Europe, he ing World War II. more dedicated to family and country said he had learned this was truly a Following World War II, Senator and humanity than DANIEL K. INOUYE. country worth dying for and certainly INOUYE finished his undergraduate Yet he was also one of the most humble one worth sacrificing an arm in order studies at the University of Hawaii and and self-effacing people. What a tre- to preserve our freedom and our way of then earned a law degree from George mendous example of a life well lived he life.
Recommended publications
  • Off Campus: to Move Forward, Washington May Have to Take a Look Back

    Off Campus: to Move Forward, Washington May Have to Take a Look Back

    October 21, 2013 Off Campus: To move forward, Washington may have to take a look back Margaret Chase Smith’s courageous actions in 1950 suggest how to handle current political dysfunction. By Joseph McDonnell, dean of the USM College of Management and Human Service PORTLAND — How has politics changed in Maine and the nation in the last 60 years? What can today’s public officials learn from the past to manage the deep divisions in the state and nation and make our political institutions work again? These are just some of the questions that the lecture series “Politics Then and Now, in Maine and the Nation,” sponsored by the Muskie School of Public Service and the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at the University of Southern Maine, is seeking to answer. It is fitting that Maine’s past and present public officials address these issues, as Maine has produced an extraordinary number of bipartisan national leaders considering the state’s small population. Sens. Margaret Chase Smith, Edmund S. Muskie, William Cohen, George Mitchell, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Angus King, while from different political orientations, share a characteristic absent in Washington today – a readiness to reach across the aisle to find common ground. Today’s elected officials could take a lesson from Sen. Smith. At the height of the Cold War, she rebuked a fellow Republican senator, Joseph McCarthy, for his tactics to rid the country of communist sympathizers. In a courageous “Declaration of Conscience,” Smith chastised McCarthy for creating a culture of fear, bigotry and smear that threatened citizens of conscience and jeopardized the reputation of Congress.
  • PPM138 Women in Senate Glossy

    PPM138 Women in Senate Glossy

    WOMEN IN THE SENATE CO LITI O hinkle — p S HN O Y J B From left: Sens. OS Barbara Mikul- T O ski of Mary- PH land, Dianne Feinstein of California, and Olympia Snowe and Susan Col- lins of Maine is that she’s been on all the major committees is the only senator to chair two — Ethics and and deeply engaged in every moving issue of our Environment and Public Works. time.” The women owe some of their success to They may not always get the respect, but Mikulski. As the unofficial “dean” of the women’s EYE-OPENER behind the scenes, female senators more caucus, the Maryland Democrat has acted as a den The Magnificent Seven frequently are getting what they want. Schroeder mother to 11 classes of new female senators. HOLIDAY WEEKEND BRUNCH u u u remembers having to plead with powerful When Mikulski first came into the Senate, committee chairmen to get the funding requests she sought out mentors to help her navigate its SUN. & MON., OCT. 11 & 12 • 11AM–3PM of congresswomen heard. complicated and often arcane rules. She turned “They would say, ‘Now, what can I pass for to Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts and Paul NEW ORLEANS PIANO • HURRICANE HOWIE From what was a record high of seven female senators elected in 1992, you girls that won’t cost us any money and will Sarbanes, her Senate colleague from Maryland, BREAKFAST CAFE • BAR make all the women love us?’” she says. calling the two Democrats her “Sir Galahads.” women have gained in numbers – and seniority No one asks those kinds of questions when They helped her land a seat on the powerful LUNCH • DINNER BOOKSTORE women hold the gavel.
  • The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer University of Baltimore School of Law

    The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer University of Baltimore School of Law

    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 3 Winter 2019 Deliberation's Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer University of Baltimore School of Law Kathleen Clark Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Tiefer, Charles and Clark, Kathleen (2019) "Deliberation's Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 24 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol24/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized editor of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deliberation’s Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer* and Kathleen Clark** ABSTRACT Much of the recent legal scholarship on the Senate expresses concern about gridlock, which was caused in part by the Senate’s supermajority requirement to pass legislation and confirm presidential nominees. This scholarship exalted the value of procedural changes permitting the majority party to push through legislation and confirmations, and failed to appreciate salutary aspects of the supermajority requirement: that it provided a key structural support for stability and balance in governance. The Senate changed its rules in order to address the problem of partisan gridlock, and now a party with a bare majority is able to force through much of its agenda.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, on Cloture on the Nomination of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C

    Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, on Cloture on the Nomination of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C

    Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, On Cloture On The Nomination Of Caitlin Halligan to the D.C. Circuit December 5, 2011 Tomorrow the Senate should be holding an up-or-down vote on the long-delayed nomination of Caitlin Halligan to fill one of three vacancies on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Instead, for the seventh time since President Obama took office 34 months ago, we are required to overcome a Republican filibuster for the Senate to consider one of President Obama’s superbly qualified judicial nominees. Ms. Halligan, President Obama’s first nominee to the important D.C. Circuit, is the former Solicitor General for the State of New York. With an impressive record in private practice and public service, she is widely respected for the quality of her work as an advocate. Indeed, Ms. Halligan’s nomination was greeted with bipartisan support and has since garnered endorsements from law enforcement officials and organizations, women’s organizations, law school deans and professors, judges and preeminent lawyers from across the political spectrum. The Judiciary Committee favorably reported Ms. Halligan’s nomination nearly nine months ago. By any traditional standard, she is the kind of superbly qualified nominee who should easily have been confirmed by the Senate months ago with the support of both Republicans and Democrats. I am disappointed that yet again instead of seeing bipartisan cooperation we are required to seek cloture. New Standards for President Obama’s Judicial Nominations From the beginning of the Obama administration, we have seen Senate Republicans shift significantly away from the standards they used to apply to the judicial nominations of a Republican President.
  • The New Normal: Unprecedented Judicial Obstruction and a Proposal for Change Michael Gerhardt & Richard Painter

    The New Normal: Unprecedented Judicial Obstruction and a Proposal for Change Michael Gerhardt & Richard Painter

    Issue Brief October 2016 The New Normal: Unprecedented Judicial Obstruction and a Proposal for Change Michael Gerhardt & Richard Painter As President Barack Obama enters the last few months of his second term, his judicial nominees have been facing unprecedented obstruction. Although he has had more judges confirmed than President George W. Bush—329 to 327—including two Supreme Court appointments, President Obama is on track, because of Senate obstruction, to have the lowest rate of judicial confirmations for a president in the latter two years of his term since the early 1950s. The obstruction has gone further, denying any confirmation hearings whatsoever for President Obama’s nomination of D.C. Circuit Chief Judge Merrick Garland to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated as a result of Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in mid-February 2016. The delay in getting any Senate action on the Garland nomination, which was made in March, is now the longest in history for a Supreme Court nomination. None of the mechanisms adopted within the Senate to prevent a minority within the body, even a substantial one, from stifling the process, address the newest form of obstruction. More than a decade ago, in 2005, the Gang of 141—a group of seven Republicans and seven Democrats—forged a deal to prevent a change in the Senate rules on filibusters and to ensure Senate action on pending judicial nominations unless there were “extraordinary circumstances.” Unfortunately, within a few years, several of the brokers of the deal left the Senate (and the Gang), the definition of what constitutes “extraordinary circumstances” was easily manipulated, and obstruction increased.
  • Senator Mccain, Et Al. Jurisdictional Statement

    Senator Mccain, Et Al. Jurisdictional Statement

    No. IN THE ~ Qtnurt nf flTt lttittb ~!i SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN, SENATOR RUSSELL FEINGOLD, REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, REPRESENTATIVE MARTIN MEEHAN, SENATOR OLYMPIA SNOWE, AND SENATOR JAMES JEFFORDS, Appellants, v. SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL et al., Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ROGER M. WITTEN SETH P. WAXMAN WILMER, CUTLER & Counsel of Record PICKERING RANDOLPH D. MOSS 399 Park A venue ERICJ. MOGILNICKI New York, NY 10022 EDWARD C. DUMONT PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING 2445 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202) 663-6000 Additional counsel on inside cover BURT NEUBORNE MICHAEL D. LEFFEL FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, JR. ANJA L. MANUEL BRENNAN CENTER FOR A. KRISAN PATTERSON JUSTICE JENNIFER L. MUELLER 161 Avenue ofthe Americas, STACY E. BECK 12th Floor JERROD C. PATTERSON New York, NY 10013 WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING DAVIDJ. HARTH 2445 M Street, N.W. CHARLES G. CURTIS, JR. Washington, D.C. 20037 MICHELLE M. UMBERGER HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & FRED WERTHEIMER MCAULIFFE LLP ALEXANDRA EDSALL One East Main Street, Suite 201 DEMOCRACY 21 Madison, WI 53703 1825 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 400 BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS Washington, D.C. 20006 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSONLLP TREVOR POTTER 355 South Grand Ave. GLENM. SHOR 35th Floor CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER Los Angeles, CA 90071 1101 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 330 E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ Washington, D.C. 20036 HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP 120 West 45th Street New York, NY 10036 ALAN B. MORRISON SCOTT L. NELSON PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP 1600 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.
  • Second Street Gangs: Ad Hoc Policy Commissions in the Senate Jennifer N

    Second Street Gangs: Ad Hoc Policy Commissions in the Senate Jennifer N

    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Working Papers Political Networks Paper Archive 6-26-2013 Second Street Gangs: Ad Hoc Policy Commissions in the Senate Jennifer N. Victor George Mason University, [email protected] Kristen Coopie Allen Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Ian Palmer Cook University of Pittsburgh - Main Campus, [email protected] Zacharcy Auter University of Pittsburgh - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pn_wp Recommended Citation Victor, Jennifer N.; Allen, Kristen Coopie; Cook, Ian Palmer; and Auter, Zacharcy, "Second Street Gangs: Ad Hoc Policy Commissions in the Senate" (2013). Working Papers. Paper 68. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pn_wp/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Networks Paper Archive at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Working Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Second Street Gangs: Ad Hoc Policy Commissions in the Senate Kristen Coopie Allen University of Pittsburgh Zachary Auter University of Pittsburgh Ian Palmer Cook University of Pittsburgh Jennifer Nicoll Victor George Mason University Abstract Recent debates in the US Congress over major policy issues, such as the US debt ceiling, the use of the filibuster in the Senate, and health care reform, have witnessed the emergence of small groups of legislators -- given names like “The Gang of Six” in popular press -- working to craft a bill that (they may expect) covers the middle-ground between opposing factions. Given the usual expectations that, 1) committee members are not preference outliers, and 2) committees have better policy expertise than the average chamber member, what purpose do these small groups serve? The argument here is that these gangs represent a focal point for accusations of ideological compromise and potential blame (if the product does not proceed to a floor vote).
  • Olympia J. Snowe

    Olympia J. Snowe

    Olympia J. Snowe U.S. SENATOR FROM MAINE TRIBUTES IN THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES E PL UR UM IB N U U S VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:36 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 081112 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\BYEBYE\BYEBYE12\81112.TXT KAYNE congress.#15 Olympia J. Snowe VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:36 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 081112 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\BYEBYE\BYEBYE12\81112.TXT KAYNE 81112.002 S. DOC. 113–14 Tributes Delivered in Congress Olympia J. Snowe United States Congresswoman 1979–1995 United States Senator 1995–2013 ÷ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2014 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:36 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 081112 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\BYEBYE\BYEBYE12\81112.TXT KAYNE Compiled under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:36 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 081112 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6687 Sfmt 6687 H:\DOCS\BYEBYE\BYEBYE12\81112.TXT KAYNE CONTENTS Page Biography .................................................................................................. v Farewell Address ...................................................................................... ix Proceedings in the Senate: Tributes by Senators: Boxer, Barbara, of California .................................................... 25 Cardin, Benjamin L., of Maryland ............................................ 20 Collins, Susan M., of Maine ...................................................... 3 Conrad, Kent, of North Dakota ................................................. 12 Enzi, Michael B., of Wyoming ..................................................
  • Olympia Snowe Is There a Future in Bipartisan Politics?

    Olympia Snowe Is There a Future in Bipartisan Politics?

    Weekend Confidential: Olympia Snowe Is there a future in bipartisan politics? The former senator aims to find out By ALEXANDRA WOLFE Olympia Snowe is having lunch at the Monocle, the same Washington restaurant where she spent last New Year's Eve, during her final week as a U.S. senator. That night, she stayed until 2 a.m., not to celebrate the holiday but to take a break after the last-minute negotiations to avoid the fiscal cliff. The Monocle, its walls covered with photos of congressmen and senators (including herself), is a place where she still feels at home, in a town that she knows well after 34 years on Capitol Hill. Waiters pass by exclaiming, "Senator Snowe!" They know she wants the peasant-style Greek salad. Wearing her trademark black ponytail, pearl earrings and necklace atop a bright pink blazer, Ms. Snowe is in town for meetings with the Bipartisan Policy Center. Rebuilding cooperation across party lines is her focus now, as she promotes her new book "Fighting for Common Ground." It is partly a biography but mostly a blistering critique of Congress. Though she lays much of the blame for how Congress has gone wrong on the Obama administration, she also calls her own Republican Party "a shadow of its former self." When she decided not to seek re-election last fall, Ms. Snowe shocked both parties, but particularly Republicans, by ceding a valuable seat in the Senate. She wrote her book to explain her decision. As she talks to former staffers who pass by the table, congratulating her on the book and asking after her husband, John McKernan, the former governor of Maine, it feels as if she were still in office.
  • Senate (Legislative Day of Tuesday, April 4, 2017)

    Senate (Legislative Day of Tuesday, April 4, 2017)

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 2017 No. 58—Part II Senate (Legislative day of Tuesday, April 4, 2017) EXECUTIVE CALENDAR—Continued lated to the preparation of that tissue. cept their ruling. But did Judge Mr. MERKLEY. Let’s turn to We could have a whole debate, and we Gorsuch accept the ruling? No. He dis- Planned Parenthood Association of should bring in the medical profes- sented from the court’s denial and Utah v. Herbert. In August of 2015, sionals to understand the details. But wanted to grant an en banc review, not Gary Herbert, Utah’s Republican Gov- in this case, it is irrelevant to have at the behest of any litigant, just that ernor, ordered the State to strip that debate because Planned Parent- Judge Gorsuch didn’t like the outcome $272,000 in Federal funding from the hood in Utah wasn’t part of the fetal of the case and wanted to have a full Planned Parenthood Association of tissue research organization. So we panel in hopes of getting the decision Utah in response to a series of highly don’t have to argue over whether fees that would defer to Governor Herbert, edited videos that alleged that Planned they have charged for repairing the tis- who wasn’t seeking any review because Parenthood clinics were selling fetal sue were fair or unfair because they he wanted to strip the organization’s tissue, even though Utah’s clinics were didn’t repair anything.
  • CLIMATE CHANGE COMMENTS by Bill Townsend Good Morning. My

    CLIMATE CHANGE COMMENTS by Bill Townsend Good Morning. My

    CLIMATE CHANGE COMMENTS By Bill Townsend Good morning. My name is Bill Townsend. I am glad to see familiar faces here, as well as some that are new to me, but who are not new to protecting the environment. I have served on the boards of most of Maine's environmental groups, and as president or chairman of many. I have been hunting and fishing in Maine for more than 50 years. I have seen directly and first hand the changes to habitat which have taken place in that time. The evidence for climate change is everywhere we look. Cold water fish such as brook trout and salmon are already under severe pressure as the result of low and warm water conditions in the summer. If we do not act immediately, we are going to lose a lot of habitat for these treasured species. We learned just last week that the important in-shore ground fisheries in the Gulf of Maine are being impacted by climate change. Climate change is a political issue, but it is not a partisan issue. Just last week a poll of Maine citizens found that more than three-quarters of them, 77% to be exact, want Senator Olympia Snowe and Senator Susan Collins to vote for federal climate legislation. It did not matter whether they were Republicans, Democrats or independents, they were and are concerned citizens who care about the world they live in. This is not just a local issue. Moose in Minnesota are in decline because of habitat loss attributable to climate change.