PPM138 Women in Senate Glossy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House). -
The George Komure Elementary School High Schooler Emily Isakari Headed Back to Her Booth at the School’S Festival
PAGE 4 Animeʼs uber populatiy. PAGE 9 Erika Fong the WHATʼS Pink Power Ranger IN A NAME? Emily Isakari wants the world to know about George Komure. PAGE 10 JACL youth in action PAGE 3 at youth summit. # 3169 VOL. 152, NO. 11 ISSN: 0030-8579 WWW.PACIFICCITIZEN.ORG June 17-30, 2011 2 june 17-30, 2011 LETTERS/COMMENTARY PACIFIC CITIZEN HOW TO REACH US E-mail: [email protected] LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Online: www.pacificcitizen.org Tel: (213) 620-1767 Food Issue: Yummy Fax: (213) 620-1768 Power of Words Resolution Connecting JACLers Mail: 250 E. First Street, Suite 301 The “Power of Words” handbook, which is being developed to Across the Country Great issue! Made me hungry Los Angeles, CA 90012 implement the Power of Words resolution passed at the 2010 Chicago just reading about the passion and StaFF JACL convention, was sent electronically to all JACL chapter Since the days when reverence these cooks have for Executive Editor Caroline Y. Aoyagi-Stom presidents recently. I would like all JACL members to take a close headquarters was in Utah and all food. How about another special look at this handbook, especially the section titled: “Which Words Are the folks involved in suffering issue (or column) featuring Assistant Editor Lynda Lin Problematic? … And Which Words Should We Promote?” during World War II, many of some of our members and their Who labeled these words as “problematic?” The words are them our personal friends, my interesting hobbies? Reporter euphemisms and we should not use them. There are words that can be wife Nellie and I have enjoyed and Keep up the wonderful work; I Nalea J. -
Off Campus: to Move Forward, Washington May Have to Take a Look Back
October 21, 2013 Off Campus: To move forward, Washington may have to take a look back Margaret Chase Smith’s courageous actions in 1950 suggest how to handle current political dysfunction. By Joseph McDonnell, dean of the USM College of Management and Human Service PORTLAND — How has politics changed in Maine and the nation in the last 60 years? What can today’s public officials learn from the past to manage the deep divisions in the state and nation and make our political institutions work again? These are just some of the questions that the lecture series “Politics Then and Now, in Maine and the Nation,” sponsored by the Muskie School of Public Service and the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at the University of Southern Maine, is seeking to answer. It is fitting that Maine’s past and present public officials address these issues, as Maine has produced an extraordinary number of bipartisan national leaders considering the state’s small population. Sens. Margaret Chase Smith, Edmund S. Muskie, William Cohen, George Mitchell, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Angus King, while from different political orientations, share a characteristic absent in Washington today – a readiness to reach across the aisle to find common ground. Today’s elected officials could take a lesson from Sen. Smith. At the height of the Cold War, she rebuked a fellow Republican senator, Joseph McCarthy, for his tactics to rid the country of communist sympathizers. In a courageous “Declaration of Conscience,” Smith chastised McCarthy for creating a culture of fear, bigotry and smear that threatened citizens of conscience and jeopardized the reputation of Congress. -
Women and the Presidency
Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States. -
Congressional Record—Senate S8109
December 18, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8109 little attention then and is even less the Hispanic community and shared Mahalo, my friend, until we meet remembered now. the community’s hopes and aspira- again. My colleagues, DANNY’S speech tions. In recent conversations, I know f should be required reading today given from his comments that he understood RECESS the recent tragedies. It was just last the growing importance of the Hispanic week that I was asked to speak on Sen- community and the benefit of advanc- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under ator INOUYE’s behalf at an event con- ing their interests within American so- the previous order, the Senate stands cerning the proposed Eisenhower Me- ciety. He lived it, he understood it, he in recess until 2:15 p.m. morial. It is a joint bipartisan effort knew. Thereupon, the Senate, at 12:33 p.m., that has taken far too long to bring to We worked together on the recogni- recessed until 2:15 p.m. and reassem- fruition. In the cloakroom the day be- tion of Filipino veterans—something bled when called to order by the Pre- fore we had one of our many discus- he was very passionate about—and he siding Officer (Mr. WEBB). sions where he grabbed my hand and thanked me most graciously, as al- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- looked me in the eye and said: You and ways, for my interest and for my com- ator from Maryland. I probably vote differently 80 percent of mitment to working with him on an f the time, but in all of our mutual ef- issue so dear to his heart. -
THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars
THE AMERICAN POWER All- Stars Scorecard & Voting Guide History About every two years, when Congress takes up an energy bill, the Big Oil Team and the Clean Energy Team go head to head on the floor of the U.S. Senate -- who will prevail and shape our nation’s energy policy? The final rosters for the two teams are now coming together, re- flecting Senators’ votes on energy and climate legislation. Senators earn their spot on the Big Oil Team by voting to maintain America’s ailing energy policy with its en- trenched big government subsidies for oil companies, lax oversight on safety and the environment for oil drilling, leases and permits for risky sources of oil, and appointments of regulators who have cozy relationships with the industry. Senators get onto the Clean Energy Team by voting for a new energy policy that will move Amer- ica away from our dangerous dependence on oil and other fossil fuels, and toward cleaner, safer sources of energy like wind, solar, geothermal, and sustainable biomass. This new direction holds the opportunity to make American power the energy technology of the future while creating jobs, strengthening our national security, and improving our environment. Introduction Lobbyists representing the two teams’ sponsors storm the halls of the Congress for months ahead of the votes to sway key players to vote for their side. The Big Oil Team’s sponsors, which include BP and the American Petroleum Institute (API), use their colossal spending power to hire sly K-Street lobbyists who make closed-door deals with lawmakers, sweetened with sizable campaign contribu- tions. -
The Election of Women to the U.S. House of Representatives: Is Demography Destiny?
The Election of Women to the U.S. House of Representatives: Is Demography Destiny? Dennis Simon Barbara Palmer Southern Methodist University Baldwin Wallace University Political Science Department Political Science Department [email protected] [email protected] Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico, January, 2016. 0 The Election of Women to the U.S. House of Representatives: Is Demography Destiny? Even a quick glance at the geographic distribution of the women in Congress suggests that there is a distinct political geography to the districts they represent: twenty-six of the eighty-four female US House members serving in 2015, or nearly one-third, were from California and New York. Eight more were from Florida. In other words, 40 percent of the women in the House came from only three states. Texas, with thirty-six districts, has only three women in its House delegation.1 Female Representatives are not randomly distributed across the country. Congressional districts in the United States vary widely in their demographic characteristics. Candidates rely heavily on demographic data to create their campaign strategies, and they often hire consulting firms to provide them with detailed profiles and suggestions for targeting voters in their districts. However, we know very little about the demographic characteristics of the districts where women have been successful candidates. Female candidates tend to cluster in particular districts, but what explains this? Can we identify the districts -
Miscellaneous National Parks Legislation Hearing
S. HRG. 110–266 MISCELLANEOUS NATIONAL PARKS LEGISLATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 128 S. 1476 S. 148 S. 1709 S. 189 S. 1808 S. 697 S. 1969 S. 867 H.R. 299 S. 1039 H.R. 1239 S. 1341 SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 40–443 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico, Chairman DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY E. CRAIG, Idaho RON WYDEN, Oregon LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD BURR, North Carolina MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JIM DEMINT, South Carolina MARIA CANTWELL, Washington BOB CORKER, Tennessee KEN SALAZAR, Colorado JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont JIM BUNNING, Kentucky JON TESTER, Montana MEL MARTINEZ, Florida ROBERT M. SIMON, Staff Director SAM E. FOWLER, Chief Counsel FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director JUDITH K. PENSABENE, Republican Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii, Chairman BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD BURR, North Carolina MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska KEN SALAZAR, Colorado BOB CORKER, Tennessee ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming BLANCHE L. -
CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy. -
Congressional Record—Senate S6769
December 7, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S6769 don’t ask, don’t tell. He signed Execu- streak of private sector job growth from the House came over in the midst tive orders protecting LGBT workers. ever. We have the lowest unemploy- of all their work. I love them. I have Americans are now free to marry the ment rate in nearly a decade. enjoyed working with them. person they love, regardless of their After 8 years of President Obama, we I look around this Chamber, and I re- gender. are now as a country on a sustainable alize the reason I am able to actually As Commander in Chief, President path to fight climate change and grow leave is because I know each of you and Obama brought bin Laden to justice. renewable energy sources. We are more your passion to make life better for These are just a few aspects of Presi- respected around the world. We reached people, and that is what it is all about. dent Obama’s storied legacy, and it is international agreements to curb cli- When I decided not to run for reelec- still growing—what a record. It is a mate change, stop Iran from obtaining tion, you know how the press always legacy of which he should be satisfied. a nuclear weapon, and we are on the follows you around. They said: ‘‘Is this America is better because of this good path to normalizing relations with our bittersweet for you?’’ man being 8 years in the White House. neighbor Cuba. My answer was forthcoming: ‘‘No I am even more impressed by who he Our country has made significant way is it bitter. -
Oversight Hearing Committee on Natural Resources
COMPARING 21ST CENTURY TRUST LAND ACQUISITION WITH THE INTENT OF THE 73RD CONGRESS IN SECTION 5 OF THE INDIAN RE- ORGANIZATION ACT OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INDIAN, INSULAR AND ALASKA NATIVE AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Thursday, July 13, 2017 Serial No. 115–15 Printed for the use of the Committee on Natural Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov or Committee address: http://naturalresources.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–253 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:44 Sep 18, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 J:\115TH CONGRESS\INDIAN, INSULAR & ALASKA NATIVE AFFAIRS\07-13-17\26253.TXT COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES ROB BISHOP, UT, Chairman RAU´ L M. GRIJALVA, AZ, Ranking Democratic Member Don Young, AK Grace F. Napolitano, CA Chairman Emeritus Madeleine Z. Bordallo, GU Louie Gohmert, TX Jim Costa, CA Vice Chairman Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan, CNMI Doug Lamborn, CO Niki Tsongas, MA Robert J. Wittman, VA Jared Huffman, CA Tom McClintock, CA Vice Ranking Member Stevan Pearce, NM Alan S. Lowenthal, CA Glenn Thompson, PA Donald S. Beyer, Jr., VA Paul A. Gosar, AZ Norma J. Torres, CA Rau´ l R. Labrador, ID Ruben Gallego, AZ Scott R. -
Senator Mccain, Et Al. Jurisdictional Statement
No. IN THE ~ Qtnurt nf flTt lttittb ~!i SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN, SENATOR RUSSELL FEINGOLD, REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, REPRESENTATIVE MARTIN MEEHAN, SENATOR OLYMPIA SNOWE, AND SENATOR JAMES JEFFORDS, Appellants, v. SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL et al., Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ROGER M. WITTEN SETH P. WAXMAN WILMER, CUTLER & Counsel of Record PICKERING RANDOLPH D. MOSS 399 Park A venue ERICJ. MOGILNICKI New York, NY 10022 EDWARD C. DUMONT PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING 2445 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202) 663-6000 Additional counsel on inside cover BURT NEUBORNE MICHAEL D. LEFFEL FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, JR. ANJA L. MANUEL BRENNAN CENTER FOR A. KRISAN PATTERSON JUSTICE JENNIFER L. MUELLER 161 Avenue ofthe Americas, STACY E. BECK 12th Floor JERROD C. PATTERSON New York, NY 10013 WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING DAVIDJ. HARTH 2445 M Street, N.W. CHARLES G. CURTIS, JR. Washington, D.C. 20037 MICHELLE M. UMBERGER HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & FRED WERTHEIMER MCAULIFFE LLP ALEXANDRA EDSALL One East Main Street, Suite 201 DEMOCRACY 21 Madison, WI 53703 1825 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 400 BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS Washington, D.C. 20006 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSONLLP TREVOR POTTER 355 South Grand Ave. GLENM. SHOR 35th Floor CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER Los Angeles, CA 90071 1101 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 330 E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ Washington, D.C. 20036 HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP 120 West 45th Street New York, NY 10036 ALAN B. MORRISON SCOTT L. NELSON PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP 1600 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C.