Canada Farm's Bronze Age Burials
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Evidence for Mummification in Bronze Age
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 03 August 2011 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Pearson, M.P. and Chamberlain, A. and Craig, O. and Marshall, P. and Mulville, J. and Smith, H. and Chenery, C. and Collins, M. and Cook, G. and Craig, G. and Evans, J. and Hiller, J. and Montgomery, J. and Schwenninger, J.L. and Taylor, G. and Wess, T. (2005) 'Evidence for mummication in Bronze Age Britain.', Antiquity., 79 (305). pp. 529-546. Further information on publisher's website: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=onlineaid=9508336fulltextType=RAleId=S0003598X00114486 Publisher's copyright statement: Copyright c Antiquity Publications Ltd 2005 Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Evidence for mummification in Bronze Age Britain Mike Parker Pearson1, Andrew Chamberlain1,OliverCraig2, Peter Marshall3, Jacqui Mulville4, Helen Smith5, Carolyn Chenery6, Matthew Collins7, Gordon Cook8, Geoffrey Craig9,JaneEvans6, Research Jen Hiller10, Janet Montgomery11, Jean-Luc Schwenninger12, Gillian Taylor13 & Timothy Wess10 Ancient Egyptians are thought to have been the only people in the Old World who were practising mummification in the Bronze Age (c. -
Early Medieval Dykes (400 to 850 Ad)
EARLY MEDIEVAL DYKES (400 TO 850 AD) A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Erik Grigg School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents Table of figures ................................................................................................ 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Declaration ...................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................. 10 1.1 The history of dyke studies ................................................................. 13 1.2 The methodology used to analyse dykes ............................................ 26 2 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DYKES ............................................. 36 2.1 Identification and classification ........................................................... 37 2.2 Tables ................................................................................................. 39 2.3 Probable early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 42 2.4 Possible early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 48 2.5 Probable rebuilt prehistoric or Roman dykes ...................................... 51 2.6 Probable reused prehistoric -
Allasdale Dunes, Barra, Western Isles, Scotland
Wessex Archaeology Allasdale Dunes, Barra Western Isles, Scotland Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 65305 October 2008 Allasdale Dunes, Barra, Western Isles, Scotland Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON W12 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 65305.01 October 2008 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2008, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Allasdale Dunes, Barra, Western Isles, Scotland Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology and Ownership ......................1 1.3 Archaeological Background......................................................................2 Neolithic.......................................................................................................2 Bronze Age ...................................................................................................2 Iron Age........................................................................................................4 1.4 Previous Archaeological Work at Allasdale ............................................5 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................6 -
Meurtres Et Sacrifices En Europe Du Nord Au Cours De La Protohistoire : Les Hommes Des Tourbières
Évan ASTIER Spécialité Archéologie des mondes celtes Meurtres et sacrifices en Europe du nord au cours de la Protohistoire : les hommes des tourbières 26 janvier 2016 Résumé : Grâce à des conditions physico-chimiques spécifiques, les tourbières d’Europe du nord ont révélé en leur sein la présence de cadavres humains dont la conservation est optimale. Cette communication est l’occasion de montrer l’apport de l’anthropologie dans notre compréhension des rites et des pratiques des sociétés protohistoriques. Divers exemples sont présentés, chacun mettant en lumière une facette des sciences anthropologiques. Mots-clefs : Tourbière - Momie - Cadavre - Celte - Europe - Anthropologie - Sacrifice - Rite - Meurtre - Violence - Angleterre - Irlande - Danemark - Pays-Bas - Strabon - Tacite Université Paris-IV Sorbonne - UMR 8167 « Orient et Méditerranée » Espaces, monuments et représentations : contribution à une « archéologie du sacré » au nord des îles britanniques et en Irlande (1000 av. J.-C. - 1000 ap. J.-C.) Sous la direction de Nathalie GINOUX 1 Les hommes des tourbières sont des momies naturelles ayant été mises au jour dans des marécages, majoritairement au nord-ouest de l’Europe. Les tourbières étaient perçues comme des voies d’accès menant à un monde surnaturel, appelé Autre-Monde, lieu de résidence des divinités et des héros. La préservation d’un corps nécessite trois facteurs essentiels : une température inférieure à 5°C, un environnement déficient en dioxygène afin que les bactéries ne se développent pas et une quantité d’acides humiques suffisante pour dissoudre les ions calcium et métalliques, permettant la conservation des tissus organiques ainsi que leur tannage. À travers cette présentation, il s’agit de montrer, par l’exemple des hommes des tourbières, l’apport de l’anthropologie dans notre compréhension des rites et pratiques des sociétés protohistoriques. -
A FREE CULTURAL GUIDE Iseag 185 Mìle • 10 Island a Iles • S • 1 S • 2 M 0 Ei Rrie 85 Lea 2 Fe 1 Nan N • • Area 6 Causeways • 6 Cabhsi WELCOME
A FREE CULTURAL GUIDE 185 Miles • 185 Mìl e • 1 0 I slan ds • 10 E ile an an WWW.HEBRIDEANWAY.CO.UK• 6 C au sew ays • 6 C abhsiarean • 2 Ferries • 2 Aiseag WELCOME A journey to the Outer Hebrides archipelago, will take you to some of the most beautiful scenery in the world. Stunning shell sand beaches fringed with machair, vast expanses of moorland, rugged hills, dramatic cliffs and surrounding seas all contain a rich biodiversity of flora, fauna and marine life. Together with a thriving Gaelic culture, this provides an inspiring island environment to live, study and work in, and a culturally rich place to explore as a visitor. The islands are privileged to be home to several award-winning contemporary Art Centres and Festivals, plus a creative trail of many smaller artist/maker run spaces. This publication aims to guide you to the galleries, shops and websites, where Art and Craft made in the Outer Hebrides can be enjoyed. En-route there are numerous sculptures, landmarks, historical and archaeological sites to visit. The guide documents some (but by no means all) of these contemplative places, which interact with the surrounding landscape, interpreting elements of island history and relationships with the natural environment. The Comhairle’s Heritage and Library Services are comprehensively detailed. Museum nan Eilean at Lews Castle in Stornoway, by special loan from the British Museum, is home to several of the Lewis Chessmen, one of the most significant archaeological finds in the UK. Throughout the islands a network of local historical societies, run by dedicated volunteers, hold a treasure trove of information, including photographs, oral histories, genealogies, croft histories and artefacts specific to their locality. -
The Landscape Archaeology of Martin Down
The Landscape Archaeology of Martin Down Martin Down and the surrounding area contain a variety of well‐preserved archaeological remains, largely because the area has been unaffected by modern agriculture and development. This variety of site types and the quality of their preservation are relatively unusual in the largely arable landscapes of central southern England. Bokerley Dyke, Grim's Ditch, the short section of medieval park boundary bank and the two bowl barrows west of Grim's Ditch, form the focus of the Martin Down archaeological landscape and, as such, have been the subject of part excavations and a detailed survey by the Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England. These investigations have provided much information about the nature and development of early land division, agriculture and settlement within this area during the later prehistoric and historic periods. See attached map for locations of key sites A ritual Neolithic Landscape….. Feature 1. The Dorset Cursus The Cursus dates from 3300 BCE which makes it contemporary with the earthen long barrows on Cranborne Chase: many of these are found near, on, or within the Cursus and since they are still in existence they help trace the Cursus' course in the modern landscape. The relationship between the Cursus and the alignment of these barrows suggests that they had a common ritual significance to the Neolithic people who spent an estimated 0.5 million worker‐hours in its construction. A cursus circa 6.25 miles (10 kilometres) long which runs roughly southwest‐northeast between Thickthorn Down and Martin Down. Narrow and roughly parallel‐sided, it follows a slightly sinuous course across the chalk downland, crossing a river and several valleys. -
Wessex Branch Newsletter
The Open University Geological Society Wessex Branch Newsletter Website http://ougs.org/wessex May 2016 Branch Organiser’s Letter CONTENTS Dear All Branch Organiser’s Letter Page 1 I hope you have all been enjoying your geology. Down Farm, Dorset, 13 March 2016 Pages 2-5 Local landslides are in the news at the moment Tedbury Camp & Vallis Vale, 28 Feb 2016 Pages 5-6 and you will find some photos of Bournemouth Bowleaze Cove, Dorset, 29 Nov 2015 Page 7 and Redcliff (above Bowleaze Cove) on pages 7 2016 AGM highlights Page 8 and 9 of this newsletter. As we point out at the A geological mystery Page 8 beginning of every field trip, we should all be Minerals guide no. 19 – Rhodochrosite Page 9 doing our own risk assessments wherever we are and highlight hazards to anyone around. Other organisations’ events Page 10 I’m certainly not going to walk along the beach Forthcoming Wessex Branch events Page 11 at Burton Bradstock or below Redcliff, and will OUGS events listing Page 12 be wary on Bournemouth prom! Wessex Branch committee Page 12 I attended Jeremy’s partner Jenny’s funeral recently. Jenny sadly lost her battle with cancer having been cared for and nursed for the and Seaton Hole on Tuesday 12th July and to past six months by Jeremy. She had a lovely see Lyme Regis coastal defences on Wednesday tribute and farewell at a woodland burial site at 13th July. For the full list, go to http://ougs.org the edge of the New Forest. Jeremy was and click on “All events”. -
Two Middle Neolithic Radiocarbon Dates from the East Midlands
THE NEWSLASTetteR OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIetY P Registered Office: University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ Two Middle Neolithic radiocarbon dates from the East Midlands Earlier this year, radiocarbon dates were commissioned for awaiting confirmation of post-excavation funding. The two Middle Neolithic artefacts from the east Midlands. The bowl was originally identified as a Food Vessel. It has a fine first was obtained from a macehead of red deer antler from thin fabric, a concave neck, rounded body and foot-ring. Watnall, Northamptonshire, currently in the collections It is decorated all over with incised herring bone motif and of the National Museums Scotland who acquired it in certainly has a Food Vessel form. However the rim form is 1946/7. The macehead is No. 2 in Simpson’s corpus (PPS much more in keeping with Impressed Ware ceramics and 1996). It is of standard ‘crown’ type, it is undecorated, and the foot-ring has been added to an otherwise rounded base. unfortunately the circumstances of the find are unknown. Both the foot-ring and the decorated lower part of the vessel A radiocarbon date was obtained from the antler itself and are features more common in Food Vessels than in Impressed produced a result of 4395±30 BP (SUERC-40112). This date Wares. Could this be a missing link? Does this vessel bridge unfortunately coincides with a plateau in the calibration curve the Impressed Ware-Food Vessel gap? A later Neolithic or but nevertheless calibrates to 3097–2916 cal BC (95.4% Chalcolithic date was expected but instead the date is very probability) and is in keeping with the few available dates firmly in the Middle Neolithic – 4790±35 BP (SUERC- already obtained for these artefacts (see Loveday et al. -
Stonehenge in Its Traditions and Structures of Meaning
Proceedings of the British Academy, 92, 145-166 Remembered and Imagined Belongings: Stonehenge in its Traditions and Structures of Meaning ALASDAIR WHITTLE Introduction THIS PAPER ATTEMPTS to ascribe meanings to Stonehenge, especially in its main phase of lithic monumentality, by considering the monument in relation to: its contemporary setting; the tradition of sacred monuments, circular and other, to which it belonged; the layouts of successive phases; the materials from which it was formed; and the patterns of approach and experience which the monument may have engendered. The monument, like other major monuments of the Later Neolithic of the third millennium BC, belonged to a sacral landscape, not to a major settlement concentration. These required the contri- bution of people from wide areas around. Stonehenge expressed the power of the past in its continuing use of circular form, and sought to make eternal both an ancient tradition of reverence for spirits and ancestral beings and a contemporary social practice of intense ceremonialism. Properties or qualities must be envisaged for the constituent materials, from chalk and timber to stone; different treatments of significant stones are noted. Layouts may have symbolised inclusion and exclusion, unity and division; the three-dimensional nature of the monument is also emphasised, and considered as a possible cosmological model of a hierarchy of spirits. Stonehenge had to be approached and experienced in predetermined ways, both from the surrounding landscape and within the monument itself. Rearrangements of the stone phase indicate how crucial it was to builders and users to make the internal settings fully propitious, for in those details much of the power of the monument may have resided. -
Mummification in Bronze Age Britain
Mummification in Bronze Age Britain Thomas J. Booth1,∗, Andrew T. Chamberlain2 & Mike Parker Pearson3 Intentional mummification is a practice usually associated with early Egyptian or Peruvian societies, but new evidence suggests that it may also have been widespread in prehistoric Britain, and possibly in Europe more generally. Following the discovery of Cladh Hallan mummified Bronze Age skeletons at the site of Cladh Hallan in the Western Isles of Scotland, a method of analysis has been developed that can consistently identify previously mummified skeletons. The results London demonstrate that Bronze Age populations N throughout Britain practised mummification Method 0 km 500 on a proportion of their dead, although the criteria for selection are not yet certain. Keywords: Britain, Cladh Hallan, Bronze Age, mummification, bone histology, treatment of the dead Introduction In previous papers in Antiquity, we have presented the first evidence for mummification in prehistoric Britain (Parker Pearson et al. 2005, 2007). Mummification is defined here as the preservation of bodily soft tissue via natural processes (e.g. deposition of a corpse within a preservative environment such as a sphagnum peat bog) or artificial means (e.g. embalming) (Aufderheide 2003: 41). Skeletons recovered from beneath Late Bronze Age roundhouses at Cladh Hallan on South Uist, Western Isles of Scotland, were shown to have been mummified prior to deposition (Parker Pearson et al. 2005, 2007, 2013); the osteological and ancient DNA analyses also indicate that these ostensibly articulated single individuals had been reconstructed from the preserved anatomical parts of several people (Parker Pearson et al. 2005; Hanna et al. 2012). These findings raise questions about the extent, distribution and nature of mummification in prehistoric Britain, a difficult research area given that similar circumstances of preservation and recovery to those found at Cladh Hallan are unlikely to be present in most parts of Britain or Europe. -
Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary
Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which have previously lacked such a published summary, either because the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. This IHA provides an introduction to prehistoric avenues and alignments, which date to the Neolithic period (about 4000-2500 BC). There are several types of prehistoric monument particularly notable for their length. This document is mainly concerned with the most numerous and widespread – cursus monuments. Two other types – avenues and stone alignments – are dealt with more briefly. A brief chronology is included. Cursus monuments have important associations with a range of other categories of archaeological monument and these are explored here. A list of in-depth sources on the topic is suggested for further reading. This document has been prepared by Martyn Barber and edited by Joe Flatman and Pete Herring. It is one of a series of 41 documents. This edition published by Historic England October 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Prehistoric Avenues and Alignments: Introductions to Heritage Assets. Historic England. Swindon HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/scheduling-selection/ihas-archaeology/ Front cover The plough-levelled Stonehenge Lesser Cursus, Wiltshire, showing as a soil mark. -
Mummification in Bronze Age Britain
Mummification in Bronze Age Britain Thomas J. Booth1, Andrew T. Chamberlain2 & Mike Parker Pearson3 1Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD. Email: [email protected] Telephone +44 (0) 207 942 5321 2Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, 3.614 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT. Email: [email protected] Telephone: +44 (0)161 306 417 3Institute of Archaeology, UCL, 31-34 Gordon Square, London, WC1H 0PY. Email: m.parker- [email protected] Telephone: +44 (0)20 7679 4767 Introduction In previous issues of Antiquity (volumes 79 & 81) we have presented the first evidence for mummification in prehistoric Britain. Skeletons recovered from beneath Late Bronze Age roundhouses at Cladh Hallan, South Uist (Outer Hebrides or Western Isles of Scotland), were shown to have been formerly mummified (Parker Pearson et al. 2005; 2007; 2013); the osteological and ancient DNA analyses also indicate that these ostensibly articulated single individuals had been reconstructed from the preserved anatomical parts of several people (Parker Pearson et al. 2005; Hanna et al. 2012). These findings raise questions about the extent, distribution and nature of mummification in prehistoric Britain, a difficult research area since similar circumstances of preservation and recovery to those found at Cladh Hallan are unlikely to be present in most parts of Britain or Europe. Our aim has been to develop a single method of analysis that can be used consistently to identify previously mummified skeletons more widely. Microscopic analysis of bone histology was one of the main methods used to infer mummification at Cladh Hallan.