Full Text(Pdf 673

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Full Text(Pdf 673 Business Management Dynamics Vol.9, No.04, Oct 2019, pp.15-27 An Exploration of the Contrasting Social Class and Workplace Expectations for Determining Chief Executive Officers in the United States vs the United Kingdom Scott Kenneth Campbell, Ph.D.1 Abstract Key words: Workplace Culture; This paper sought to improve upon the understanding of the social class and Social Class; Ivy League and workplace cultural expectations for the determination of Chief Executive CEO Promotion Officers in the United States vs the United Kingdom. The author found that workplace cultural expectations were very different for aspiring executives in the United States vs the United Kingdom. In addition, the author found strong indications of a potential social class barrier for aspiring executives in the Available online United Kingdom that was not evident in the United States. Workplace culture www.bmdynamics.com was determined by weekly hours worked by CEO’s vs typical executives in the ISSN: 2047-7031 United States and the United Kingdom. Social class was determined by the exploration of undergraduate alma maters and consideration of whether these schools would be considered “Ivy League” or not. INTRODUCTION Public and academic fascination with CEO compensation, company performance, perceptions of excessive compensation and even considerations of CEO vs average worker compensation have existed for decades. However, this article will seek to address two considerations that are often overlooked in academic research, much less completely ignored in general publication articles. This article will consider the years of effort, possible excessive effort needed for individuals to work their way into the top offices of the largest corporations. In addition, this article will seek to compare the social and potential class barriers that successful CEO’s must strive to overcome. The author will explore the work expectations and social barriers the successful CEO’s of the 100 largest companies based in the United States of America have had to address. The author will then seek to compare and contrast the social and work expectations that the CEO’s of the 100 largest companies located in the United Kingdom have had to contend with during their climb to the top spot. It is anticipated that differences in working expectations as well as potential social and class barriers might be found between these two similar countries. Research for decades has focused on CEO compensation and looked at the corollary analysis with company performance. In general, these studies have found modest relationships between compensation and company performance. In addition, it is very easy to find articles and political figures railing against and condemning the often large compensation packages for American CEO’s. However, what is often overlooked amongst all the vindictive is the sheer amount of hard work that CEO’s do and have had to commit to for decades to reach the top of their fields. UNITED STATES VS UNITED KINGDOM WORKING EXPECTATIONS Employees and executive officers from different countries have varying working cultural expectations that tend to vary depending on societal likes and dislikes. In addition, government laws and regulations, especially concerning non-exempt employees (those eligible for over-time pay), also play a significant role in the determination of workplace cultural expectations. Workers and managers are exposed to, and often develop these characteristics of working expectations during their early schooling years. In addition, managers especially are exposed to these expectations during their years of higher education. The differing cultural expectations between the United States and the United Kingdom are evident in the work expectations to obtain a 4-year college degree. In the United States, the course load expectations have increased in the past decades to such an extent that only 36% of students attending top-rated 1 The School of Arts and Sciences, Division of Business, History and Social Sciences, Gordon State College, 419 College Drive, Barnesville, Georgia 30204, United States of America ©Society for Business and Management Dynamics Business Management Dynamics Vol.9, No.04, Oct 2019, pp.15-27 colleges complete their degree in 4 years. That figure drops to only 19% when one is looking at 4-year graduation rates from lower-tier universities, with a more working-class student body. (Anschuetz, 2015). For students in the United States, a 4-year college degree generally takes 5 years to complete (NCES, 2019). In contrast, educational expectations are significantly less demanding not only in the United Kingdom, but across the European Union as well. In 1999, 29 countries in the European Union signed the Bologna Declaration restricting course requirements to allow for the awarding of a bachelor’s degree in three years. Therefore, even for students attending Oxford or Cambridge, a “4-year” degree only requires 3 years of study (Belasco, 2019). The cultural expectations for working hours in the United States are more than the working hours expected for employees in the United Kingdom. Employees in both countries report to work at approximately the same time. However, the amount of time spent at work is dramatically different between the two countries. A recent study by Sarah Berger in the Harvard Business Review has found that American executives will work an average of 44 hours per week. However, this same study also concluded that the average American CEO will work an average of 62.5 hours per week (Berger, 2018). In the United Kingdom, the average work week for an executive is very similar to their American counterparts at just 42.7 hours a week (Henrich, 2017). However, there is a significant difference in the working hours of British CEOs. In the United Kingdom, the average work week for a CEO is just 44.7 hours (Taneja, 2013). An even more telling difference, as if an extra 20 hours a week were not enough, is the times and hours spent working by CEOs of both countries. In the United Kingdom, just 13% of CEOs reported working some or regular hours over the weekends (Cartwright, 2010). This contrasts with the 79% of American CEOs who reported they worked an average of 3.9 hours a day for Saturday and Sunday (Berger, 2018). Even the length and utilization of vacation days are significantly different for American CEOs vs their counterparts in the United Kingdom. On average, American executives will take 16.2 days of vacation during the year. However, American CEOs generally take 5 days of vacation or less each year (Kelly, 2016). Even on vacation, American CEOs will typically spend 2.4 hours a day working (Berger, 2018). Unlike the United States which has no government required paid vacation leave, full-time employees in the United Kingdom are guaranteed 28 days of paid vacation per year. In sharp contrast to their American counterparts, executives in the United Kingdom, including the CEOs typically take most if not all of their allotted 28 days of vacation time (Taneja, 2013). In addition, coworkers in the United Kingdom have a cultural expectation of both encouraging and supporting those who are on their vacations (Tetlow, 2017). Even the expectations of behaviors during the typical working day contrasts between the United States and the United Kingdom. A recent study indicates that most employees in the United Kingdom report to work at 10:30 am and leave at 4:30 pm. Therefore, by 5 pm, everyone in the United Kingdom has left work and one can easily hear a pin drop to the floor (Jackson, & Sundaram, 2015). In contrast, executives in United States arrive at work early in the morning and generally leave after 5 pm (Davis, 2016). The schedule of work between executives working in the United Kingdom and those in the United States are also different. Executives in the United Kingdom have several breaks, both cultural and government mandated during the working hours. For instance, British employees are entitled to tea breaks at specific times as scheduled by the management and government regulations (Jackson, & Sundaram, 2015). In contrast, although non-exempt workers in the United States have government mandated breaks during the workday, American executives have no such cultural or government mandated breaks (Henrich, 2017). A prime example of the differences between executive work expectations between the United States and the United Kingdom would be the differences in lunch breaks. The American workers and aspiring executives in companies often have their lunch at their desks instead of going out for lunch. A standard fixture in many American corporate offices is the lunch service. Instead of going to eat at a restaurant, aspiring executives in the United States will order a sandwich, or similar meal that can be quickly consumed at their desk (Le Blanc, 2017). In contrast, aspiring executives in the United Kingdom tend to ©Society for Business and Management Dynamics Business Management Dynamics Vol.9, No.04, Oct 2019, pp.15-27 go for lunch outside the company (Bond, 2014). Instead of the service providers bringing the meals to the British executive’s desks, they tend to leave and have their food in desired places. In addition to having lunch at one’s desk as opposed to having lunch outside the company, executives in the United States that do leave work for lunch also behave very differently than their counterparts in the United Kingdom. In the United States, workers and executives are often allotted an hour, and often only a half hour for their lunch breaks (Le Blanc, 2017). In addition, the consumption of alcohol during lunch breaks is discouraged if not outright forbidden. In contrast, workers and executives in the United Kingdom are guaranteed an hour for lunch, and executives often have lunches that extend closer to two hours. In addition, having lunch at a local pup, a restaurant or even a private club with the consumption of modest amounts of alcohol during the meal is frequently the norm for workers and executives in the United Kingdom (Bond, 2014).
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record Date
    ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: JULY 1, 2018 - JUNE 30, 2019 FUND: VANGUARD FTSE 100 UCITS ETF --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUER: 3i Group Plc TICKER: III CUSIP: G88473148 MEETING DATE: 6/27/2019 FOR/AGAINST PROPOSAL: PROPOSED BY VOTED? VOTE CAST MGMT PROPOSAL #1: ACCEPT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ISSUER YES FOR FOR STATUTORY REPORTS PROPOSAL #2: APPROVE REMUNERATION REPORT ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #3: APPROVE FINAL DIVIDEND ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #4: RE-ELECT JONATHAN ASQUITH AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #5: RE-ELECT CAROLINE BANSZKY AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #6: RE-ELECT SIMON BORROWS AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #7: RE-ELECT STEPHEN DAINTITH AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #8: RE-ELECT PETER GROSCH AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #9: RE-ELECT DAVID HUTCHISON AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #10: ELECT COLINE MCCONVILLE AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #11: RE-ELECT SIMON THOMPSON AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #12: RE-ELECT JULIA WILSON AS DIRECTOR ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #13: REAPPOINT ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS AUDITORS ISSUER YES FOR FOR PROPOSAL #14: AUTHORISE BOARD ACTING THROUGH THE ISSUER YES FOR FOR AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE TO FIX REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS PROPOSAL #15: AUTHORISE EU POLITICAL DONATIONS AND ISSUER YES FOR FOR EXPENDITURE PROPOSAL #16: AUTHORISE ISSUE
    [Show full text]
  • Britvic Annual Report 2008
    Britvic plc Britvic plc Britvic House Broomfield Road 2008 Annual Report Britvic plc Chelmsford Essex CM1 1TU Annual Report 2008 Telephone 01245 261871 Fax 01245 267147 www.britvic.com Electronic communications Shareholders can elect to receive shareholder documents electronically by registering with Shareview at www.shareview.co.uk Who We Are This will save on printing and distribution costs, creating environmental benefits. When you register, you will be sent an email notification to say when shareholder documents are available on our website and you will be provided with a link to that information. Britvic is one of the two leading branded soft drinks When registering, you will need your shareholder reference number which can be found on your share certificate or proxy form. businesses in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Many Please contact Equiniti if you require any assistance or further information. Contacts of our brands are either first or second in their respective The Company Secretary is John Price and the registered office is Britvic House, Broomfield Road, Chelmsford CM1 1TU, categories. We have a strong track record of innovation telephone 01245 504482, fax 01245 504435, website www.britvic.com The Company’s Registrar is Equiniti, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA, telephone 0871 384 2520* in products, packaging and marketing activity. In 2007 (UK callers) +44 121 415 7047 (non-UK callers). we expanded into Ireland with a significant acquisition * For those with hearing difficulties, a textphone is available on 0871 384 2255 for UK callers with compatible equipment. Further copies of this report are available from the Company’s registered office (address as above) and may be accessed through and we have a long-standing bottling agreement the Company’s website, www.britvic.com with PepsiCo for key brands such as Pepsi, 7UP and Gatorade in UK and Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 07/01/2017 to 06/30/2018 Location(S): All Locations
    Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 07/01/2017 to 06/30/2018 Location(s): All Locations BGP Holdings Plc Meeting Date: 07/03/2017 Country: Malta Primary Security ID: Record Date: 05/25/2017 Meeting Type: Special Ticker: N/A Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Approve Reduction of Share Premium Account Mgmt For For 2 Approve Distribution of EUR 5 Million to Mgmt For For Directors 3 Approve Distribution of EUR 1.5 Million to Mgmt For For Directors Red Rock Resorts, Inc. Meeting Date: 07/06/2017 Country: USA Primary Security ID: 75700L108 Record Date: 05/08/2017 Meeting Type: Annual Ticker: RRR Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction 1.1 Elect Director Frank J. Fertitta, III Mgmt For For 1.2 Elect Director Lorenzo J. Fertitta Mgmt For For 1.3 Elect Director Robert A. Cashell, Jr. Mgmt For For 1.4 Elect Director Robert E. Lewis Mgmt For For 1.5 Elect Director James E. Nave Mgmt For For 2 Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Mgmt For For Officers' Compensation 3 Advisory Vote on Say on Pay Frequency Mgmt One Year One Year 4 Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors Mgmt For For LondonMetric Property Plc Meeting Date: 07/11/2017 Country: United Kingdom Primary Security ID: G5689W109 Record Date: 07/07/2017 Meeting Type: Annual Ticker: LMP Vote Summary Report Reporting Period: 07/01/2017 to 06/30/2018 Location(s): All Locations LondonMetric Property Plc Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Accept Financial Statements and Statutory Mgmt For For Reports 2
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Annual Report 2016 making life’s everyday moments more enjoyable Contents Strategic report 2 Chairman’s introduction 4 Britvic at a glance 6 Our brands 8 Our business model 10 Trends 11 Our geographies 12 Our strategy 14 Key performance indicators 16 Chief Executive Officer’s review 19 Chief Financial Officer’s review 24 Sustainable business review 28 Our risks 32 Viability statement Governance 34 Corporate governance report 36 Board of directors 47 Nomination committee 50 Audit Committee 58 Remuneration Committee 59 Directors’ remuneration report 61 At a glance 67 Annual Report on Remuneration 76 Directors’ Remuneration Policy 85 Directors’ report 88 Statement of directors’ responsibilities Financial statements 90 Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of Britvic plc 96 Consolidated income statement 97 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income/(expense) 98 Consolidated balance sheet 99 Consolidated statement of cash flows 100 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 101 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 148 Company balance sheet 149 Company cash flow statement 150 Company statement of changes in equity 151 Notes to the company financial statements Other information 160 Shareholder information 162 Glossary 163 Non-GAAP reconciliations Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements This announcement includes statements that are forward-looking in nature. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the group to be materially different from any future results, Britvic takes care of the environment by choosing pureprint® environmental print performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking technology. All the electricity used in the production of this report was generated from renewable sources and vegetable oil based inks were used throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Britvic Plc Annual Report 2007 Contents
    Britvic plc Annual Report 2007 Contents 02 Our Brands 08 Chairman’s Statement 09 Operating and Financial Review 09 Chief Executive’s Review 14 Current Trading and Outlook 14 Financial and Business Review 18 Business Resources 19 Risks and Uncertainties 20 Corporate Responsibility 22 Board of Directors 24 Reports and Accounts Contents 25 Directors’ Report 29 Corporate Governance 33 Directors’ Remuneration Report 40 Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Britvic plc 41 Consolidated Income Statement 42 Consolidated Balance Sheet 43 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 44 Consolidated Statement of Recognised Income and Expense 45 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 85 Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of Britvic plc 86 Company Balance Sheet 87 Notes to the Company Financial Statements 92 Shareholder Information BR1-007_Front_end_07_vAW5 13/12/07 17:24 Page 1 Financial Highlights* Total branded revenue £716.3m, up 5.7% EBITDA1 £126.3m, up 4.4% Operating profit £80.0m, up 8.5% Operating profit margin 11.2%, up 30 basis points Free cash flow2 £75.1m, £48.9m in 2006 Profit before tax £61.3m, up 9.7% Basic earnings per share 20.4p, up 10.9% Full year dividend per share 11.0p * Footnotes can be found on the inside back cover. Britvic plc Annual Report 2007 1 BR1-007_Front_end_07_vAW5 13/12/07 17:20 Page 2 Britvic brands are synonymous with quality, and parents know they can buy our drinks with confidence. With brands that appeal to all ages, our drinks keep the whole family hydrated and happy every day. 2 Britvic plc Annual Report 2007 BR1-007_Front_end_07_vAW5 13/12/07 17:20 Page 3 It has been a particularly busy year for the Robinsons brand.
    [Show full text]
  • Britvic Annual Report 2009
    24/7 A day in the life of Britvic Annual Report 2009 OVERVIEW 01/ OUR PERForMANCE AT A GLANCE 03/ OUR BRAND PORTFOLIO 06/ WHO WE ARE 07/ WHERE WE ARE 08/ STraTEGY For GroWTH 09/ BRAND HIGHLIGHTS BUSINEss REVIEW 12/ ChaIRMAN’S STATEMENT 13/ ChIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW 20/ FINANCIAL REVIEW 25/ CorporaTE REspoNSIBILITY 27/ BUSINEss REsoURCES 28/ RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES GOVERNANCE 32/ board OF DIRECTors 36/ DIRECTors’ REporT 39/ CorporaTE GOVERNANCE REporT 43/ DIRECTors’ REMUNEraTION REporT 50/ AUDITOR’S REporT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 51/ CoNsoLIdaTED INCOME STATEMENT 52/ CoNsoLIdaTED BALANCE SHEET 53/ CoNsoLIdaTED STATEMENT OF Cash FLOWS 54/ CoNsoLIdaTED STATEMENT OF RECogNISED INCOME AND EXPENSE 55/ NoTES TO THE CoNsoLIdaTED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 90/ AUDITor’S REporT TO THE MEMBErs OF BRITVIC PLC 91/ CoMpaNY BALANCE SHEET 92/ NoTES TO THE COMpaNY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SharEhoLDER INForMATION 96/ SharEhoLDER proFILE AND INForMATION 97/ CaUTIONarY STATEMENT Sources: Nielsen Scantrak GB take-home 52 weeks MAT to 26 September 2009 Nielsen on-premise brewers MAT September 2009 Nielsen Scantrak ROI grocery 52 weeks MAT to 4 October 2009 Hall & Partners OVERVIEW OUR PERForMANCE AT A GLANCE GROUP GROUP TOTAL BRANDED REVENUE EBIT 2006 £677.7m 2006 £73.7m 2007 £716.3m 2007 £80.0m 2008 £926.5m 2008 £96.7m 2009 £978.8m 2009 £110.1m +5.6% +13.9% GROUP GROUP GROUP FULL YEAR DIVIDEND EARNINGS PER SHARE FREE CASH FLOW 2006 10.0p 2006 18.4p 2006 £48.9m 2007 11.0p 2007 20.4p 2007 £65.3m 2008 12.6p 2008 24.8p 2008 £66.2m 2009 15.0p 2009 29.9p 2009 £69.7m +19.0% +20.6% +5.3% GB AND INTERNATIONAL GB AND INTERNATIONAL REVENUE EBIT 2006 £669.6m 2006 £71.8m 2007 £692.5m 2007 £76.2m 2008 £725.8m 2008 £82.0m 2009 £789.3m 2009 £97.9m +8.7% +19.4% Britvic plc Annual Report 2009 1 OVERVIEW EVERY MINUTE EVERY HOUR EVERY DAY Someone somewhere is contributing to the creation of a Britvic brand.
    [Show full text]
  • Britvic Plc Annual Report 2006 Britvic Plc at a Glance
    Britvic plc Annual Report 2006 Britvic plc at a glance Company Facts 2005/6 Company Highlights • 2,700 employees • Investment in production facilities continued, • 7 factories including the opening of a new Fruit Shoot line with • 16 depots a 45m litre annual capacity • 2 main offices • Successful implementation of restructuring programme • 1 National Distribution Centre • GDA labelling adopted (to be rolled out during 2006/7) • Sugar reduction programme delivered • CR strategy adopted for 2006/7 and beyond Market Facts Britvic Strategy • 1.4bn litres sold annually • Aggressively grow stills • Number 1 supplier in licensed on-trade1 • Grow our share of carbonates • Number 2 supplier in take-home1 • Be the supplier of choice • 2nd largest supplier of branded soft drinks in GB2 • Drive real benefits from the Pepsi relationship • Be the most efficient FMCG company • Make Britvic a great place to work Market Position1 Total Take-Home Total Licensed On-Trade Total sales £5.8bn Total sales £2.3bn BRITVIC 11% BRITVIC 44% ALL OTHER 41% CCE 34% CCE 26% ALL OTHER 18% GLAXOSMITHKLINE 8% RED BULL 4% DANONE 6% TROPICANA UK 4% RED BULL 2% BARRS 2% Licensed On-Trade Take-Home Stills Take-Home Carbonates Licensed On-Trade Stills Carbonates Total sales £3.4bn Total sales £2.4bn Total sales £0.7bn Total sales £1.6bn BRITVIC 10% BRITVIC 12% BRITVIC 52% BRITVIC 40% ALL OTHER 59% CCE 54% ALL OTHER 24% CCE 41% DANONE 11% GLAXOSMITHKLINE 12% CCE 21% ALL OTHER 13% CCE 7% ALL OTHER 12% HARTRIDGE 3% RED BULL 7% TROPICANA UK 7% RED BULL 6% GLAXOSMITHKLINE 5% BARRS 4% INNOCENT 2% Stills Carbonates Britvic is the number 1 supplier of branded stills in Britvic’s franchise arrangement with PepsiCo allows us GB3.
    [Show full text]