DOCSLIB.ORG

The Persistent Contributions of RNA to Eukaryotic Gen(Om)E Architecture and Cellular Function

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Persistent Contributions of RNA to Eukaryotic Gen(Om)E Architecture and Cellular Function Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Persistent Contributions of RNA to Eukaryotic Gen(om)e Architecture and Cellular Function Ju¨rgen Brosius Institute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Mu¨nster, D-48149 Mu¨nster, Germany Correspondence: [email protected] Currently, the best scenario for earliest forms of life is based on RNA molecules as they have the proven ability to catalyze enzymatic reactions and harbor genetic information. Evolu- tionary principles valid today become apparent in such models already. Furthermore, many features of eukaryotic genome architecture might have their origins in an RNA or RNA/ protein (RNP) world, including the onset of a further transition, when DNA replaced RNA as the genetic bookkeeper of the cell. Chromosome maintenance, splicing, and regulatory function via RNA may be deeply rooted in the RNA/RNP worlds. Mostly in eukaryotes, conversion from RNA to DNA is still ongoing, which greatly impacts the plasticity of extant genomes. Raw material for novel genes encoding protein or RNA, or parts of genes including regulatory elements that selection can act on, continues to enter the evolutionary lottery. Everything has been said already, but not yet by every- Kruger et al. 1982; Guerrier-Takada et al. 1983; one. Noller et al. 1992) leveled a major hurdle in —Karl Valentin understanding the origin of life. The salient Sturgeon’s Revelation: Ninety percent of science fiction discoveries eliminated the virtually impossible is crud, but then, ninety percent of everything is crud. prerequisite for two to three different classes of —Theodore Sturgeon macromolecules to converge as an evolving unit. At the same time, RNA provides a required con- They think that intelligence is about noticing things tinuity in the path of evolution (Yarus 2011) that are relevant (detecting patterns); in a complex world, intelligence consists in ignoring things that are during various genetic takeovers or evolution- irrelevant (avoiding false patterns). ary transitions (Cairns-Smith 1982; Szathma´ry —Nassim Nicholas Taleb (Taleb 2010) and Smith 1995). In a remarkably insightful ar- ticle dating back half a century, Alex Rich fore- f all extant cellular macromolecules, RNA saw much of what now is becoming main- Ois the most ancient, persisting as much as 4 stream, for example, that RNA was ancestral to  109 years in our planet’s life-forms. The abil- protein and DNA (Rich 1962). This landmark ity to combine genotype with phenotype such publication received little attention over the as catalytic activity (Noller and Chaires 1972; years; even early proponents of an RNA world Editors: Patrick J. Keeling and Eugene V. Koonin Additional Perspectives on The Origin and Evolution of Eukaryotes available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2014 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016089 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016089 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press J. Brosius did not refer to this article (Woese 1967; Crick could replicate themselves or each other. Should 1968; Orgel 1968; Gilbert 1986), although at the threshold be set at the transition when the least one of the investigators must have had molecules involved could change during repli- knowledge about the article, as it was cited in cation and the variants are subjected to selec- a different context concerning the stereochem- tion—the initial Darwinian ancestor (IDA) ical possibility of six distinct base pairs (Crick (Szathma´ry 2006; Yarus 2011)? The first self- 1968). The origin of the DNA genome from replicating macromolecules must not necessar- RNA and that “DNA may be regarded as a de- ily have been RNA. Derivatives of RNA, espe- rivative molecule which has evolved in the form cially with altered backbones, have been sug- that it only carries out part of the primitive nu- gested as predecessors of RNA owing to more cleic acid function” is anothercorrect prediction favorable chemistries/stabilities for spontane- (Rich 1962). Furthermore, the investigator pre- ous generation and persistence of oligomeriza- saged mechanisms such as antisense RNA con- tion at the presumed planetary conditions trol of gene expression, short interfering RNAs (Joyce et al. 1987; Scho¨ning et al. 2000; Zhang (siRNAs), and perhaps microRNAs (miRNAs): et al. 2005; Powner et al. 2009; Robertson and “If both strands are active, then the DNAwould Joyce 2012; Neveu et al. 2013). produce two RNA strands which are comple- An interesting question is, if it is that “sim- mentary to each other. Only one of these might ple,” why did life not evolve multiple times? be active in protein synthesis, and the other There are a number of explanations. The early strand might be a component of the control or environment of the planet with conditions fa- regulatory signal” (Rich 1962). voring the necessary chemical reactions differed In this article, I shall present the rise and from the more temperate conditions now (Rob- persistence of RNA from the dawn of an RNA ertson and Joyce 2012). Perhaps life did evolve world and discuss current evolutionary princi- before LUCA numerous times independently, ples already apparent in an RNAworld. In com- but the descendants of LUCA are the only sur- parison to Archaea and Bacteria, the eukaryotic vivors. Perhaps primitive forms of life, for ex- genome is a better vantage point, as archaeal and ample, in the form of IDAs, still do arise, but we bacterial genomes are more derived and, thus, are not aware of them, in part, because we have lost many of the RNA signatures that eukaryotes not searched for such simple and different life- still show. It is likely that eukaryotic DNA ge- forms. Another reason is that a nascent form of nomes not only kept much more of their RNA/ life would easily be outcompeted by the estab- RNP world heritage than previously anticipat- lished ones, as the latter had a great chronolog- ed, but also continue to evolve novel RNAs in ical advantage adapting to current conditions. various functional roles. New forms of life might have a chance only if their metabolism is sufficiently different and, thus, not useful prey to LUCA-related life-forms WHEN DOES LIFE BEGIN? or if they happened to evolve in an unoccupied An excellent treatise of possible scenarios lead- niche so as not to succumb to immediate pre- ing to and continuing in an RNA world to the dation by the fitter “incumbents.”1 last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is available (Atkins et al. 2011). Can the beginning of life be defined along the transitions from RETRACING THE PATH physicochemical to biological reactions? Like In any event, by applying in vitro synthesis and almost everything in biology, clear boundaries selection procedures (Ellington and Szostak are difficult to demarcate and thus the defini- tion of the first life-form rather occupies a 1 bandwidth on a continuum. One of several pos- An afterthought worthy of note is the dichotomy with re- spect to life’s fragility considering individuals, even species sible thresholds to consider would be the fortu- versus the resilience of life as a whole, over an 4-billion- itous generation of one or two molecules that year timescale. 2 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016089 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RNA and Eukaryotic Gene/Genome Architecture 1990; Tuerk and Gold 1990; Gold et al. 2012), vide, fuse while shuffling their contents and di- several laboratories are making great strides to- vide again, in other words, performing sexual ward generating RNA molecules with the ability acts. Another “forecast” of the mechanisms gen- to self-replicate (Doudna and Szostak 1989; erating genomic diversity would be recombina- Johnston et al. 2001; Zaher and Unrau 2007; tion not only between cells, but also between Lincoln and Joyce 2009; Shechner et al. 2009; different RNA molecules, a mechanism that ac- Wochner et al. 2011; Attwater et al. 2013; Mast tually had been observed in a two-component et al. 2013), although these RNA polymerase ribozyme system (Lincoln and Joyce 2009). The ribozymes still fail to completely self-replicate origin of viruses could date to this early stage of (Deamer 2005). Cooperation of two or more cellular evolution as well. RNA molecules could, RNA enzymes in hypercycles (Eigen and Schus- perhaps protected by a lipid envelope, move ter 1977) may be a solution to this problem from cell to cell, blurring the line between infec- (Vaidya et al. 2012) (see also below). tion and horizontal transfer. Once a self-replicating ribozyme (mono- or multimeric) arose with the further potential to MOST EVOLUTIONARY PRINCIPLES ARE AT evolve into a replicator not restricted to only LEAST AS ANCIENT AS THE RNA WORLD self-copy but to copy other RNA templates as well, a prerequisite for a metabolically self-suf- Lessons from the RNA world apply remarkably ficient RNA conglomerate, further challenges well to extant organisms and their genomes. are apparent. First, the replicator indiscrimi- In a primitive RNA cell, conflict and coopera- nately copying any “junk RNA”in the mix hard- tion, selfishness and altruism had to coexist and ly would be able to persist. Second, if further establish a fine balance. Importantly, the suc- RNA molecules would arise by copying with cess of individual ribozymes also depended to errors—just like in extant organisms, new genes a large degree on functional interactions with still arise by duplication and variation—to other cellular RNAs (today: gene products), eventually take over metabolic functions other namely, the (genetic) background of the proto- than replication (e.g., activated compounds, in- cell (Brosius 2003c).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of a Non-LTR Retrotransposon from the Gypsy Moth
    Insect Molecular Biology (1999) 8(2), 231-242 Identification of a non-L TR retrotransposon from the gypsy moth K. J. Garner and J. M. Siavicek sposons (Boeke & Corces, 1989), or retroposons USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, (McClure, 1991). Many non-L TR retrotransposons Delaware, Ohio, U.S.A. have been described in insects, including the Doc (O'Hare et al., 1991), F (Di Nocera & Casari, 1987), I (Fawcett et al., 1986) and jockey (Priimiigi et al., 1988) Abstract elements of Drosophila melanogaster, the T1Ag A family of highly repetitive elements, named LDT1, (Besansky, 1990) and Q (Besansky et al., 1994) ele- has been identified in the gypsy moth, Lymantria ments of Anopheles gambiae, and the R1Bm (Xiong & dispar. The complete element is 5.4 kb in length and Eickbush, 1988a) and R2Bm (Burke et al., 1987) lacks long-terminal repeats, The element contains two families of ribosomal DNA insertions in Bombyx mori. open reading frames with a significant amino acid Gypsy moths (Lymantria dispar) are currently wide- sequence similarity to several non-L TR retrotrans- spread forest pests in the north-eastern United States posons. The first open reading frame contains a and the adjacent regions of Canada. Population region that potentially encodes a polypeptide similar markers have been sought to distinguish the North to DNA-binding GAG-like proteins. The second American gypsy moths introduced from Europe in 1869 encodes a polypeptide resembling both endonuclease from those recently introduced from Asia (Bogdano- and reverse transcriptase sequences. A" members of wicz et al., 1993; Pfeifer et al., 1995; Garner & Siavicek, the LDT1 element family sequenced thus far have poly- 1996; Schreiber et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Evolutionary Relationship of Prion Proteins and ZIP Transporters in Health and Disease
    The Significance of the Evolutionary Relationship of Prion Proteins and ZIP Transporters in Health and Disease by Sepehr Ehsani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto © Copyright by Sepehr Ehsani 2012 The Significance of the Evolutionary Relationship of Prion Proteins and ZIP Transporters in Health and Disease Sepehr Ehsani Doctor of Philosophy Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto 2012 Abstract The cellular prion protein (PrPC) is unique amongst mammalian proteins in that it not only has the capacity to aggregate (in the form of scrapie PrP; PrPSc) and cause neuronal degeneration, but can also act as an independent vector for the transmission of disease from one individual to another of the same or, in some instances, other species. Since the discovery of PrPC nearly thirty years ago, two salient questions have remained largely unanswered, namely, (i) what is the normal function of the cellular protein in the central nervous system, and (ii) what is/are the factor(s) involved in the misfolding of PrPC into PrPSc? To shed light on aspects of these questions, we undertook a discovery-based interactome investigation of PrPC in mouse neuroblastoma cells (Chapter 2), and among the candidate interactors, identified two members of the ZIP family of zinc transporters (ZIP6 and ZIP10) as possessing a PrP-like domain. Detailed analyses revealed that the LIV-1 subfamily of ZIP transporters (to which ZIPs 6 and 10 belong) are in fact the evolutionary ancestors of prions (Chapter 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Using Rnai to Elucidate Mechanisms of Human Disease
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2008) 15, 809–819 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1350-9047/08 $30.00 www.nature.com/cdd Review From sequence to function: using RNAi to elucidate mechanisms of human disease NM Wolters1 and JP MacKeigan*,1 RNA interference (RNAi) has emerged as one of the most powerful tools for functionally characterizing large sets of genomic data. Capabilities of RNAi place it at the forefront of high-throughput screens, which are able to span the human genome in search of novel targets. Although RNAi screens have been used to elucidate pathway components and discover potential drug targets in lower organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, only recently has the technology been advanced to a state in which large-scale screens can be performed in mammalian cells. In this review, we will evaluate the major advancements in the field of mammalian RNAi, specifically in terms of high-throughput assays. Crucial points of experimental design will be highlighted, as well as suggestions as to how to interpret and follow-up on potential cell death targets. Finally, we assess the prospective applications of high-throughput screens, the data they are capable of generating, and the potential for this technique to further our understanding of human disease. Cell Death and Differentiation (2008) 15, 809–819; doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4402311; published online 18 January 2008 The sequencing of the human genome ushered a new era into maintaining the balance between cell survival, cell death, the field of modern biology; it is now possible to elucidate and autophagy represents a crucial regulatory point in human molecular pathways relevant to development and disease health and that when this balance is tipped, a variety of with a breadth never before seen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beaver's Phylogenetic Lineage Illuminated by Retroposon Reads
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The Beaver’s Phylogenetic Lineage Illuminated by Retroposon Reads Liliya Doronina1,*, Andreas Matzke1,*, Gennady Churakov1,2, Monika Stoll3, Andreas Huge3 & Jürgen Schmitz1 Received: 13 October 2016 Solving problematic phylogenetic relationships often requires high quality genome data. However, Accepted: 25 January 2017 for many organisms such data are still not available. Among rodents, the phylogenetic position of the Published: 03 March 2017 beaver has always attracted special interest. The arrangement of the beaver’s masseter (jaw-closer) muscle once suggested a strong affinity to some sciurid rodents (e.g., squirrels), placing them in the Sciuromorpha suborder. Modern molecular data, however, suggested a closer relationship of beaver to the representatives of the mouse-related clade, but significant data from virtually homoplasy- free markers (for example retroposon insertions) for the exact position of the beaver have not been available. We derived a gross genome assembly from deposited genomic Illumina paired-end reads and extracted thousands of potential phylogenetically informative retroposon markers using the new bioinformatics coordinate extractor fastCOEX, enabling us to evaluate different hypotheses for the phylogenetic position of the beaver. Comparative results provided significant support for a clear relationship between beavers (Castoridae) and kangaroo rat-related species (Geomyoidea) (p < 0.0015, six markers, no conflicting data) within a significantly supported mouse-related clade (including Myodonta, Anomaluromorpha, and Castorimorpha) (p < 0.0015, six markers, no conflicting data). Most of an organism’s phylogenetic history is fossilized in their heritable genomic material. Using data from genome sequencing projects, particularly informative regions of this material can be extracted in sufficient num- bers to resolve the deepest history of speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements
    GE54CH23_Feschotte ARjats.cls September 12, 2020 7:34 Annual Review of Genetics A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements Jonathan N. Wells and Cédric Feschotte Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850; email: [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Genet. 2020. 54:23.1–23.23 Keywords The Annual Review of Genetics is online at transposons, retrotransposons, transposition mechanisms, transposable genet.annualreviews.org element origins, genome evolution https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-040620- 022145 Abstract Annu. Rev. Genet. 2020.54. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Access provided by Cornell University on 09/26/20. For personal use only. Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences that propagate All rights reserved within genomes. Through diverse invasion strategies, TEs have come to oc- cupy a substantial fraction of nearly all eukaryotic genomes, and they rep- resent a major source of genetic variation and novelty. Here we review the defining features of each major group of eukaryotic TEs and explore their evolutionary origins and relationships. We discuss how the unique biology of different TEs influences their propagation and distribution within and across genomes. Environmental and genetic factors acting at the level of the host species further modulate the activity, diversification, and fate of TEs, producing the dramatic variation in TE content observed across eukaryotes. We argue that cataloging TE diversity and dissecting the idiosyncratic be- havior of individual elements are crucial to expanding our comprehension of their impact on the biology of genomes and the evolution of species. 23.1 Review in Advance first posted on , September 21, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Life History of P Transposons: from Horizontal Invaders to Domesticated Neogenes
    Chromosoma (2001) 110:148–158 DOI 10.1007/s004120100144 CHROMOSOMA FOCUS Wilhelm Pinsker · Elisabeth Haring Sylvia Hagemann · Wolfgang J. Miller The evolutionary life history of P transposons: from horizontal invaders to domesticated neogenes Received: 5 February 2001 / In revised form: 15 March 2001 / Accepted: 15 March 2001 / Published online: 3 May 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract P elements, a family of DNA transposons, are uct of their self-propagating lifestyle. One of the most known as aggressive intruders into the hitherto uninfected intensively studied examples is the P element of Dro- gene pool of Drosophila melanogaster. Invading through sophila, a family of DNA transposons that has proved horizontal transmission from an external source they useful not only as a genetic tool (e.g., transposon tag- managed to spread rapidly through natural populations ging, germline transformation vector), but also as a model within a few decades. Owing to their propensity for rapid system for investigating general features of the evolu- propagation within genomes as well as within popula- tionary behavior of mobile DNA (Kidwell 1994). P ele- tions, they are considered as the classic example of self- ments were first discovered as the causative agent of hy- ish DNA, causing havoc in a genomic environment per- brid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster (Kidwell et missive for transpositional activity. Tracing the fate of P al. 1977) and were later characterized as a family of transposons on an evolutionary scale we describe differ- DNA transposons
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers
    cells Review Molecular Basis of the Function of Transcriptional Enhancers 1,2, 1, 1,3, Airat N. Ibragimov y, Oleg V. Bylino y and Yulii V. Shidlovskii * 1 Laboratory of Gene Expression Regulation in Development, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (A.N.I.); [email protected] (O.V.B.) 2 Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov St., 119334 Moscow, Russia 3 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8, bldg. 2 Trubetskaya St., 119048 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-4991354096 These authors contributed equally to this study. y Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 3 July 2020; Published: 5 July 2020 Abstract: Transcriptional enhancers are major genomic elements that control gene activity in eukaryotes. Recent studies provided deeper insight into the temporal and spatial organization of transcription in the nucleus, the role of non-coding RNAs in the process, and the epigenetic control of gene expression. Thus, multiple molecular details of enhancer functioning were revealed. Here, we describe the recent data and models of molecular organization of enhancer-driven transcription. Keywords: enhancer; promoter; chromatin; transcriptional bursting; transcription factories; enhancer RNA; epigenetic marks 1. Introduction Gene transcription is precisely organized in time and space. The process requires the participation of hundreds of molecules, which form an extensive interaction network. Substantial progress was achieved recently in our understanding of the molecular processes that take place in the cell nucleus (e.g., see [1–9]).
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Organization/ Human
    Genome Organization/ Secondary article Human Article Contents . Introduction David H Kass, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA . Sequence Complexity Mark A Batzer, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA . Single-copy Sequences . Repetitive Sequences . The human nuclear genome is a highly complex arrangement of two sets of 23 Macrosatellites, Minisatellites and Microsatellites . chromosomes, or DNA molecules. There are various types of DNA sequences and Gene Families . chromosomal arrangements, including single-copy protein-encoding genes, repetitive Gene Superfamilies . sequences and spacer DNA. Transposable Elements . Pseudogenes . Mitochondrial Genome Introduction . Genome Evolution . Acknowledgements The human nuclear genome contains 3000 million base pairs (bp) of DNA, of which only an estimated 3% possess protein-encoding sequences. As shown in Figure 1, the DNA sequences of the eukaryotic genome can be classified sequences such as the ribosomal RNA genes. Repetitive into several types, including single-copy protein-encoding sequences with no known function include the various genes, DNA that is present in more than one copy highly repeated satellite families, and the dispersed, (repetitive sequences) and intergenic (spacer) DNA. The moderately repeated transposable element families. The most complex of these are the repetitive sequences, some of remainder of the genome consists of spacer DNA, which is which are functional and some of which are without simply a broad category of undefined DNA sequences. function. Functional repetitive sequences are classified into The human nuclear genome consists of 23 pairs of dispersed and/or tandemly repeated gene families that chromosomes, or 46 DNA molecules, of differing sizes either encode proteins (and may include noncoding (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Non-LTR Retrotransposons in the Genome of Arabidqpsis Thulium
    Copyright 0 1996 by the Genetics Society of America Multiple Non-LTR Retrotransposons in the Genome of ArabidqPsis thulium David A. Wright,* Ning Ke," Jan Smalle,t" Brian M. Hauge,t'2Howard M. Goodmant and Daniel F. Voytas* *Department of Zoology and Genetics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 and tDepartment of Genetics, Haward Medical School and Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 021 14 Manuscript received June 13, 1995 Accepted for publication October 14, 1995 ABSTRACT DNA sequence analysis near the Arabidopsis thaliana AB13 gene revealed the presence of a non-LTR retrotransposon insertion thatwe have designated Tal 1-1.This insertion is 6.2 kb in length and encodes two overlapping reading frames with similarity to non-LTR retrotransposon proteins, including reverse transcriptase. A polymerase chain reaction assaywas developed based on conserved amino acid sequences shared between the Tall-1 reverse transcriptase and those of non-LTR retrotransposons from other species. Seventeen additionalA. thaliana reverse transcriptases were identified that range in nucleotide similarity from 4848% (Ta12-Ta28). Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the A. thaliana sequences are more closely related to each other than to elements from other organisms, consistent with the vertical evolution of these sequences over mostof their evolutionary history. One sequence, Ta17,is located in the mitochondrial genome. The remaining are nuclear andof low copy number among 17 diverse A. thaliana ecotypes tested, suggesting that they are not highly active in transposition. The paucity of retrotransposons and the small genome size of A. thaliana support the hypothesis that most repetitive sequences have been lost from the genome and that mechanisms may exist to prevent amplification of extant element families.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancer Rnas Are an Important Regulatory Layer of the Epigenome
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0446-0 Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome Vittorio Sartorelli 1 and Shannon M. Lauberth 2 ✉ Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) direct a remarkable number of diverse functions in development and disease through their regula- tion of transcription, RNA processing and translation. Leading the charge in the RNA revolution is a class of ncRNAs that are synthesized at active enhancers, called enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Here, we review recent insights into the biogenesis of eRNAs and the mechanisms underlying their multifaceted functions and consider how these findings could inform future investigations into enhancer transcription and eRNA function. he explosion of high-throughput sequencing data has Many different models for how enhancers function in gene con- revealed the complexity and diversity of the transcriptome. trol have been proposed since their initial discovery nearly four TThese data have also unexpectedly revealed that only 1–2% decades ago19–21. Specifically, there is considerable evidence demon- of the transcriptome provides instructions for the synthesis of strating that looping of distal enhancers to their target promoters is functional proteins, while the remaining 98–99% gives rise to a required for enhancer function (reviewed in ref. 22). For example, plethora of ncRNAs, including transfer RNAs (tRNAs), ribosomal a key study revealed that experimental induction of chromatin RNAs (rRNAs), intronic RNAs, small nuclear (sn)RNAs, small looping between the mouse β-globin (Hbb) promoter and its asso- nucleolar (sno)RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding ciated enhancer region results in transcriptional activation of the RNAs (lncRNAs). A recent addition to the expanding list of regu- Hbb gene23.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Parameters of Trans Scission by Extended HDV-Like Ribozymes and the Prospect for the Discovery of Genomic Trans-Cleaving Rnas
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Kinetic Parameters of trans Scission by Extended HDV-like Ribozymes and the Prospect for the Discovery of Genomic trans-Cleaving RNAs. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1894s91p Journal Biochemistry, 57(9) ISSN 0006-2960 Authors Webb, Chiu-Ho T Lupták, Andrej Publication Date 2018-03-01 DOI 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00789 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1894s91p#supplemental Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Article Cite This: Biochemistry 2018, 57, 1440−1450 pubs.acs.org/biochemistry Kinetic Parameters of trans Scission by Extended HDV-like Ribozymes and the Prospect for the Discovery of Genomic trans- Cleaving RNAs Chiu-Ho T. Webb†,∥ and Andrej Luptaḱ*,†,‡,§ † Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of CaliforniaIrvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States ‡ Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of CaliforniaIrvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States § Department of Chemistry, University of CaliforniaIrvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Hepatitis delta virus (HDV)-like ribozymes are self- cleaving catalytic RNAs with a widespread distribution in nature and biological roles ranging from self-scission during rolling-circle replication in viroids to co-transcriptional processing of eukaryotic retrotransposons, among others. The ribozymes fold into a double pseudoknot with a common catalytic core motif and highly variable peripheral domains. Like other self-cleaving ribozymes, HDV-like ribozymes can be converted into trans-acting catalytic RNAs by bisecting the self-cleaving variants at non- essential loops. Here we explore the trans-cleaving activity of ribozymes derived from the largest examples of the ribozymes (drz-Agam-2 family), which contain an extended domain between the substrate strand and the rest of the RNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancer Rnas: Transcriptional Regulators and Workmates of Namirnas in Myogenesis
    Odame et al. Cell Mol Biol Lett (2021) 26:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-021-00248-x Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters REVIEW Open Access Enhancer RNAs: transcriptional regulators and workmates of NamiRNAs in myogenesis Emmanuel Odame , Yuan Chen, Shuailong Zheng, Dinghui Dai, Bismark Kyei, Siyuan Zhan, Jiaxue Cao, Jiazhong Guo, Tao Zhong, Linjie Wang, Li Li* and Hongping Zhang* *Correspondence: [email protected]; zhp@sicau. Abstract edu.cn miRNAs are well known to be gene repressors. A newly identifed class of miRNAs Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration termed nuclear activating miRNAs (NamiRNAs), transcribed from miRNA loci that and Innovation Key exhibit enhancer features, promote gene expression via binding to the promoter and Laboratory of Sichuan enhancer marker regions of the target genes. Meanwhile, activated enhancers pro- Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, duce endogenous non-coding RNAs (named enhancer RNAs, eRNAs) to activate gene Sichuan Agricultural expression. During chromatin looping, transcribed eRNAs interact with NamiRNAs University, Chengdu 611130, through enhancer-promoter interaction to perform similar functions. Here, we review China the functional diferences and similarities between eRNAs and NamiRNAs in myogen- esis and disease. We also propose models demonstrating their mutual mechanism and function. We conclude that eRNAs are active molecules, transcriptional regulators, and partners of NamiRNAs, rather than mere RNAs produced during enhancer activation. Keywords: Enhancer RNA, NamiRNAs, MicroRNA, Myogenesis, Transcriptional regulator Introduction Te identifcation of lin-4 miRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans in 1993 [1] triggered research to discover and understand small microRNAs’ (miRNAs) mechanisms. Recently, some miRNAs are reported to activate target genes during transcription via base pairing to the 3ʹ or 5ʹ untranslated regions (3ʹ or 5ʹ UTRs), the promoter [2], and the enhancer regions [3].
    [Show full text]