DOCSLIB.ORG

The Dispute Between Two Major European Powers Over Gibraltar's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Dispute Between Two Major European Powers Over Gibraltar's T.C. TURKISH- GERMAN UNIVERSTY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS MASTER PROGRAMME THE DISPUTE BETWEEN TWO MAJOR EUROPEAN POWERS OVER GIBRALTAR’S SOVEREIGNTY MASTER’S THESIS Ahmet ATİLLA (158101112) ADVISOR Dr. Enes Bayraklı Istanbul, 2018 i T.C. TURKISH- GERMAN UNIVERSTY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS MASTER PROGRAMME THE DISPUTE BETWEEN TWO MAJOR EUROPEAN POWERS OVER GIBRALTAR’S SOVEREIGNTY MASTER’S THESIS Ahmet ATİLLA (158101112) Thesis Submission Date to Institute: 26.06.2018 Thesis Defence Date: 26.06.2018 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Enes BAYRAKLI ………………………. Other Jury Members: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang WESSELS ..………………… Dr. Ali ASLAN ……………………. Istanbul, June 2018 ii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Ahmet ATİLLA iii To My Family, iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. ÖZET .......................................................................................................... IX ABSTRACT ................................................................................................ X LIST OF ABBREVIATION ..................................................................... XI 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THESIS ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND THE ARGUMENTATION OF THE THESIS ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.3 THE STRUCTURE AND METHODOLOGY OF THE THESIS ................... 8 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................... 11 v 2.1 CLASSICAL REALISM .................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 The Definition of Classical Realism ........................................................... 11 2.2 EUROPEANIZATION ....................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Definition of Europeanization..................................................................... 16 3. A CLASSICAL REALIST ANALYSIS OF GIBRALTAR DISPUTE ..................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 THE EMERGENCE OF GIBRALTAR DISPUTE ......................................... 25 3.2 APPLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF CLASSICAL REALISM INTO GIBRALTAR DISPUTE .......................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 The Power Politics and the Sieges for Acquiring Gibraltar during 18th Century .................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 British Gibraltar during 19th Century ....................................................... 30 3.2.3 Gibraltar during First and Second World War ........................................ 32 3.2.4 A Secluded Gibraltar ................................................................................... 36 3.3 CONCLUSION: THE DOMINANCE OF CLASSICAL REALIST ASSUMPTIONS AND ELEMENTS ....................................................................... 41 vi 4. AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE EUROPEANIZATION OF SPAIN ON GIBRALTAR DISPUTE ............................................... 43 4.1 ESTABLISHING DEMOCRACY IN SPAIN AFTER FRANCO ERA ........ 45 4.2 THE LISBON AGREEMENT ........................................................................... 48 4.3 SPAIN’S ACCESSION TO NATO ................................................................... 50 4.4 BRUSSELS AGREEMENT ............................................................................... 52 4.5 SPAIN’S ACCESSION TO EC (1986).............................................................. 54 4.6 THE EMERGENCE OF CIVILIAN COMMUNITY AND THE GIBRALTARIAN IDENTITY ................................................................................ 56 4.7 CONCLUSION: THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF EUROPEANIZATION ............................................................................................. 60 5. BREXIT AND GIBRALTAR DISPUTE ............................................ 62 5.1 THE CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THE BREXIT REFERENDUM ........... 63 5.2 THE IMPACT OF BREXIT REFERENDUM ON GIBRALTAR DISPUTE .................................................................................................................................... 66 vii 6.CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 68 7. LIST OF REFERENCES ..................................................................... 72 8. CIRRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................ 75 viii ÖZET İKİ BÜYÜK AVRUPA GÜCÜNÜN CEBELİTARIK’IN BAĞIMSIZLIĞI ÜZERİNDEKİ ANLAŞMAZLIĞI Britanya Cebelitarık‟ı İspanya‟dan 1704 yılında İspanya Veraset Savaşı sırasında ele geçirmiştir. İspanya Cebelitarık‟ı 1713 Barış ve Dostluk Anlaşması ile resmi olarak Britanya‟ya vermiştir. Daha sonra ise anlaşmanın yorumlanmasında tarafların anlaşamaması ve İspanya‟nın Cebelitarık üzerinde hak iddia etmesiyle Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığı başlamıştır. Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığında İspanya ve Birleşik Krallık 1975‟e kadar güce dayalı realist politikalar ile bu anlaşmazlığı çözmeye çalışmışlardır. Bu anlamda İspanya, yüzyıllar boyunca kuşatma, ambargo ve savaş gibi araçlar ve güce dayalı politikalar ile Cebelitarık‟ı Birleşik Krallıktan geri almaya çalışmıştır. Bu anlaşmazlık General Franco dönemi boyunca da devam etmiştir. İspanya Cebelitarık ile olan sınırını 1969‟da tamamen kapattığında anlaşmazlık çıkmaza girmiştir. Fakat bu durum General Franco‟nun ölümünün ardından değişmiş ve takiben İspanya‟da demokrasiye geçiş süreci başlamıştır. Dahası, İspanya 1977‟de üye olmak için Avrupa Topluluğu‟na başvuruda bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte adaylık süreciyle Avrupalılaşma süreci başlamış ve etkisini hem iç hem de dış politikada yaşanan değişimle göstermiştir. Bu bağlamda İspanya, Cebelitarık‟a olan tutumunu yumuşatmış, Franco döneminde dondurulan ilişkileri sınırı yeniden açarak düzeltmiştir. Böylece Avrupalılaşma süreci Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığında dönüştürücü bir rol oynayarak, yüzyıllardır devam eden güce dayalı politikaların terkini sağlamış, barışçıl yol ve çözümlerin zeminini oluşturmuştur. Bu süreçte Cebelitarıklılar ise belirli ölçüde Birleşik Krallıktan siyasi hak ve özgürlük elde ederek Birleşik Krallık vasıtasıyla Avrupa Birliği ile ekonomiden güvenliğe birçok alanda işbirliği sağlamıştır. Birleşik Krallık Haziran 2016‟da Avrupa Birliği üyeliği referandumu yapmıştır. Birleşik Krallık yüzde 52 ile birlikten ayrılma kararı alırken Cebelitarık yüzde 96 ile birlikte kalma yönünde oy kullanmıştır. Referandum sonuçları Birleşik Krallık içinde birçok tartışmayı da beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu karar özellikle son otuz yıldır Avrupa Birliği‟nin etkisiyle yumuşamış olan Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığını İspanya-Birleşik Krallık hattında tekrardan germiştir. Bu tezde ise 300 yılı aşkındır devam eden bu anlaşmazlık ve bu anlaşmazlığa etki eden faktörler anlatılacaktır. Bu tez argüman olarak Avrupalılaşma sürecinin Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığında her iki ülkenin güç odaklı realist siyasetten diplomatik yollara dayalı barışçıl politikalara geçiş yaptığını kullanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu tezde teorik çerçeve olarak klasik realizm ve Avrupalılaşma kavramı bu dönüşümü anlatmak için kullanılacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Cebelitarık Anlaşmazlığı, Klasik Realizm, Güç Siyaseti, Avrupalılaşma, Brexit Referandumu ix ABSTRACT THE DISPUTE BETWEEN TWO MAJOR EUROPEAN POWERS OVER GIBRALTAR’S SOVEREIGNTY Britain seized Gibraltar from Spain in 1704 during the Spanish Succession War. Spain officially handed the sovereignty of Gibraltar to Britain after the Treaty of Peace and Friendship Treaty in 1713. The Gibraltar Dispute began with when the Spain and Britain failed to reach a consensus on interpreting the treaty and the claim‟s of Spain over Gibraltar. Britain and Spain intended to solve this dispute by power politics until 1975.Spain applied the means of the power politics such as sieges, embargo and the war throughout centuries to take control of Gibraltar from Britain. The Gibraltar Dispute reached a deadlock when Spain closed the border gate in 1969 However, the status quo started to change in 1975 after the death of Franco who had ruled Spain since 1939 by dictatorship. Thus, the death of Franco led to the start of the transition to democracy. Spain applied for EC membership in 1977. Europeanization process began with the application and showed its influence in both domestic and foreign affairs. Because Spain underwent such a transformation, having developed diplomatic relations with the UK. As a result, as Spain‟s attitude towards Gibraltar changed, the border gate between Spain and Gibraltar, which was closed during the Franco era, was reopened.The Europeanization process played a transformative role in the Gibraltar Dispute and led to abandon of the centuries long power based realist politics. The process provided a basis for peaceful resolutions. Meanwhile, Gibraltarian people gained political rights from the UK and developed cooperation with the EU from economy to security through the membership of the UK. The UK held the EU membership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: Gibraltar
    HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 13th Report of Session 2016–17 Brexit: Gibraltar Ordered to be printed 21 February 2017 and published 1 March 2017 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 116 The European Union Committee The European Union Committee is appointed each session “to scrutinise documents deposited in the House by a Minister, and other matters relating to the European Union”. In practice this means that the Select Committee, along with its Sub-Committees, scrutinises the UK Government’s policies and actions in respect of the EU; considers and seeks to influence the development of policies and draft laws proposed by the EU institutions; and more generally represents the House of Lords in its dealings with the EU institutions and other Member States. The six Sub-Committees are as follows: Energy and Environment Sub-Committee External Affairs Sub-Committee Financial Affairs Sub-Committee Home Affairs Sub-Committee Internal Market Sub-Committee Justice Sub-Committee Membership The Members of the European Union Select Committee are: Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws Lord Trees Lord Boswell of Aynho (Chairman) Earl of Kinnoull Baroness Verma Baroness Brown of Cambridge Lord Liddle Lord Whitty Baroness Browning Baroness Prashar Baroness Wilcox Baroness Falkner of Margravine Lord Selkirk of Douglas Lord Woolmer of Leeds Lord Green of Hurstpierpoint Baroness Suttie Lord Jay of Ewelme Lord Teverson Further information Publications, press notices, details of membership, forthcoming meetings and other information is available at http://www.parliament.uk/hleu. General information about the House of Lords and its Committees is available at http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 31St DECEMBER 2018 Company
    CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL REPORT 31st DECEMBER 2018 Company registration number: 37905 Gibtelecom Ltd 31st December 2018 2 | P a g e Gibtelecom Ltd 31st December 2018 CONTENTS DIRECTORS AND OTHER INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 5 DIRECTORS’ REPORT ............................................................................................................................ 6 1. Principal Activities ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Regulatory regime ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3. Reduce market churn and win back customers .......................................................................................... 6 4. Grow the global and enterprise business .................................................................................................... 8 5. Improve operational efficiencies ................................................................................................................. 8 6. Future Developments .................................................................................................................................. 9 7. Principal risks ............................................................................................................................................... 9 8. Financial results ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750-1947
    Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society 6 The Global World of Indian Editorial Board C. A. BAYLY Merchants, 1750-1947 Vere Harmsworih Professor of Imperial and Naval History, University of Cambridge, and Fellow ofSt Catharine's College Traders ofSindjrom Bukhara to Panama RAJNARAYAN CHANDAVARKAR Fellow of Trinity College and Lecturer in History, University of Cambridge GORDON JOHNSON Claude Markovits President of Wolfson College, and Director, Centre of South Asian Studies, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris University of Cambridge Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society publishes monographs on the history and anthropology of modern India. In addition to its primary scholarly focus, the series also includes work of an interdisciplinary nature which contributes to contemporary social and cultural debates about Indian history and society. The series is thus designed to further the general development of historical and anthropological knowledge and to attract a wider readership than that concerned with India alone. 1 C. A. Bayly Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780-1880 0 521 57085 9 (hardback) 0 521 663601 (paperback) 2 Ian Copland The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917-1947 0 521 57179 0 3 SamitaSen Women and Labour in Late Colonial India: The Bengal Jute Industry, 0 521 45363 1 4 SumitGuha Environment and Ethnicity in India, 1200-1991 0 521 64078 4 5 Tirthankar Roy Traditional Industry in the Economy of Colonial India 0 521 65012 7 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The politics of merchant networks 213 trenched.1 Their attitude to the British, who occupied Shikarpur in 1839 and annexed it in 1843, was not devoid of ambiguity.
    [Show full text]
  • How Has Gibraltar's Position Within Britain's Military Structure Impacted
    STUDENT PAPER SERIES39 How has Gibraltar’s position within Britain’s military structure impacted on the role of women in Gibraltar Society? Shelina Assomull Master’s in International Relations Academic year 2016-2017 ABSTRACT The military base is an intrinsic part of a country’s worldwide presence and power made necessary by the anarchistic international system. Gibraltar is a remnant of Britain’s global footprint. The fact that Gibraltar initially acted as a military base makes assessing the base’s position and impact on Gibraltar essential in analysing Gibraltarian gender relations. This dissertation aims to understand this, using feminist theory. To do so, I will firstly focus on the feminist theorising of military bases presented by Cynthia Enloe’s Bananas, Beaches and Bases. I will then examine Gibraltar’s similarities to the ‘base women’ Enloe examines. This will encompass prostitution, marriage, nationality, employment status and other themes in Gibraltar that draw parallels with Enloe’s theory: The base always comes first. This is particularly true to Gibraltar between the late nineteenth to mid-twentieth century. Part two will build on this by exploring a unique three-way nexus of identity. This nexus encompasses three relationships that intertwine in a way that is unique to Gibraltar. These relationships are; the interaction and tensions between the military and the civilian, the class divide between British and Alien, and at the heart of all these relationships remains a core divide in them all which is that of masculine and feminine. This will demonstrate that although Gibraltar once matched the Enloe base, the territory’s history has developed towards the late twentieth century, maintaining aspects of base life but still evolving its societal dynamics and feminist exterior, resulting in a shift of gender identities today.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 20 March 2008
    United Nations A/AC.109/2008/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 March 2008 Original: English Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Gibraltar Working paper prepared by the Secretariat Contents Paragraphs Page I. General ............................................................. 13 II. Constitutional, legal and political issues .................................. 2–14 3 III. Economic conditions .................................................. 15–34 5 A. General......................................................... 15–18 5 B. Public finance ................................................... 19–22 6 C. Trade .......................................................... 23–24 6 D. Banking and financial services ..................................... 25–27 7 E. Transportation, communications and utilities .......................... 28–32 7 F. Tourism ........................................................ 33–34 8 IV. Social conditions ..................................................... 35–46 9 A. Labour ......................................................... 35 9 B. Human rights .................................................... 36 9 C. Social security and welfare ........................................ 37–39 9 D. Public health .................................................... 40 10 E. Education ....................................................... 41–43 10 F. Crime and crime prevention .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Port Authority (GPA), the Gibraltar Tourist Board Has Been the Weakening Pound, Said Alex Lavarello, Director of and the Region’S Ship and Port Agencies
    Regional Focus: Gibraltar GIBRALTAR ROCKS Europe’s number one bunkering port, a pivotal link between the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean, a favourite stopping-off point for superyachts and a tiny city port with a burgeoning infrastructure base. Gibraltar has never been busier spectacular landmark for passing ships? A UK Royal Navy base? Or an outcrop of southern Spain? TheA British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar has been all three of these at one time or another. However, its pivotal position on a major sea route has given it a far more modern role as Europe’s number one bunkering port and a favourite stopping off point for an almost unending procession of superyachts. and But its importance internationally has been highlighted population of extraordinarily as it looks set to become entwined in the 32,000. Gibraltar shares a 1.2km- negotiations between the UK, the European Union and now Spain long land border with Spain and lies 14km over Britain’s exit from the EU. north of the African coast of Morocco. Strategically perched on the route that links the Mediterranean, The numbers and volumes of projects in Gibraltar in the the Atlantic and the Caribbean and overlooking the Strait of last 12 months have exceeded every previous year. It is generally Gibraltar, the Rock is a vibrant and dynamic port city with a acknowledged in the region that the main reasons for this current bulging infrastructure that belies its tiny 6.7 square kilometre size upsurge in activity are greater global appreciation of its pretty 38 Ship Management International Issue 66 March/April 2017 Regional Focus: Gibraltar and unique location, a Health, Safety and Environmental Management).
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Chief Political Correspondent and Old Girl Inspires Leaders Of
    Summer Term 2017 HIGH DAYS There’s life in the Old Girl yet… Old Girls take a walk on the BBC Chief Political Correspondent wild side with Steve Backshall and Old Girl inspires leaders of >> Find out more, pg. 2 tomorrow at Speech Day Truro High School for Girls celebrated traditions old and new this month as the BBC’s Chief Political Correspondent and Old Girl Vicki Young inspired the leaders of tomorrow at our annual Speech Day and prize giving ceremony in Truro Cathedral. Vicki left the school as Head She inspired the audience with a Girl in 1988 before heading to fascinating address in which she Cambridge University and talked about the inner workings has, for many years, been one of Parliament, its traditions and of the BBC’s best known, the importance of breaking and most respected, faces gender stereotypes in the world Leading the way on the reporting on the comings and of politics. Straits of Gibraltar goings of Westminster. She said: “At the Election last >> Find out more, pg. 4 month, 208 women were elected During her years as a Political – a record high but this still Correspondent she has covered means that only 29% of the five General Election House of Commons is female. campaigns, reporting for the MPs are sent to Parliament to BBC Six and Ten o’clock news, represent us and it might be Radio 4 and 5 Live. better if it reflected what our whole society looks like.” Continued page 2, col 2. Contents A walk on the wild side ….
    [Show full text]
  • Political Committee Issue: the Situation in Gibraltar Student Officer: Myrsini Karamanli Position: Co-Chair
    Committee/Council: Political Committee Issue: The situation in Gibraltar Student Officer: Myrsini Karamanli Position: Co-Chair Introduction The situation in Gibraltar is an issue that has for many decades been a object of debate, negotiation and friction between its three mainly involved parties – Gibraltar, United Kingdom and Spain. The root of this long conflict lies on Gibraltar’s sovereignty, since for almost three centuries the region has been a part of United Kingdom with its own government. Since 1963 the Kingdom of Spain has taken a series of actions questioning this political status, focusing on its rights on sovereignty of the area according to the 1713’s Treaty of Utrecht – the treaty that passed Gibraltar to the United Kingdom. This long-lasting debate can in a way be considered as justified, especially when thinking about the region’s position of high strategic importance. Located in Southwestern Europe, on the southern coast of Spain, Gibraltar has for many years been a very important naval base as it borders the Strait of Gibraltar, a narrow channel that connects the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean. Gibraltar’s population map consists of a variety of ethnic groups such as Spanish, Italian, English, Maltese, Portuguese, German and North Africans who have all been granted a British citizenship since 1981. As stated above, Gibraltar has its own democratically elected government represented by the House of Assembly and a governor appointed by the United Kingdom. The government is responsible for regulating all sectors apart from matters of defence and foreign policy, which are under the jurisdiction of the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • (GIBRALTAR) Mr
    United Nations Nations Unies Distr. RESTRICTED CRS/2019/CRP.7 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH THIRD INTERN TIONAL DECADE FOR THE ERADICATION OF COLONIALISM Carib ean regional seminar on the imple entation of the Third International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism: accelerating decolonization through renewed commitment and pragmatic measures Saint George s, Gre ada 2 to 4 May 2019 STATEMENT BY JOSEPH BOSSANO (GIBRALTAR) Mr. Chairman, I want to deal with the views expressed by Spain at the UN in support of their so ereignty claim and with C24's failure to address our People s rights under the Charter and the Decolonization Resolutions. Spain has been repeating the history of the capture of Gibraltar, not too accurately. Spanish Gibraltar was attacked by a combined force of Dutch and English Marines on 3 August 1704 and surrendered within 24 hours. Spain claims the inhabitants were then expelled and their descendants are the true Gibraltarians. Those who left were not a People distinct from the rest of Spain. The Spaniards had conquered Gibraltar 250 years earlier and expelled its population. These had originally come fro North Africa, 500 years earlier, and expelled the Visigoth inhabitants. Other than after 1704, there has never been a unique population with its own identity in Gibraltar, the Gibraltarians. The treatment of the Spanish soldiers and civilians in 1704, allowing them to go and fight another day, which they did shortly after, was fairly lenient compared to Spain s conduct of the time. In the Americas Spain's treatment of the territories they conquered was not to expel the indigenous people, but to massacre them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the United Kingdom's Withdrawal from the European Union on Scotland, Wales and Gibraltar
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS The Impact of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union on Scotland, Wales and Gibraltar IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS Abstract Upon request by the AFCO Committee, the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs has commissioned this in-depth analysis on the impact of Brexit on the devolved territories of Scotland and Wales as well as the Overseas Territory of Gibraltar. It examines the economic and political implications of Brexit on these territories, the consequences of the possible return to devolved administrations of formerly ‘Europeanised’ competencies and looks at how Brexit might affect their future status within the UK as well as their relations with the EU. PE 583 118 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs and was commissioned, overseen and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Research Administrator Responsible PAPAGEORGIOU Ioannis Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] AUTHOR KEATING Michael, University of Aberdeen LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in April 2017 and updated in September 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit and Gibraltar
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7963, 2 May 2017 By Vaughne Miller Brexit and Gibraltar Contents: 1. Gibraltar’s constitutional status 2. Relations with Spain 3. Gibraltar and the EU 4. Brexit www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Brexit and Gibraltar Contents Summary 4 1. Gibraltar’s constitutional status 5 1.1 British Overseas Territory 5 1.2 The Gibraltar Government and Parliament 6 2. Relations with Spain 7 Brussels Process 7 Re-launch of Brussels Process 7 A new forum for dialogue 7 Issues: border controls, fishing rights, money laundering and smuggling 8 Spanish elections 9 3. Gibraltar and the EU 10 Gibraltar joined with the UK 10 EU law in Gibraltar 10 4. Brexit 12 4.1 The 2016 EU referendum 12 4.2 Gibraltar’s constitutional status 12 4.3 New Spanish Foreign Minister 14 4.4 The Gibraltar International Airport 14 4.5 The border 16 4.6 Gibraltar’s economy 17 Currency 17 Recent economic performance 17 Impact of Brexit on Gibraltar’s economy 18 Impact of Brexit on local Spanish economy 20 4.7 Is there an issue concerning pensions for Spanish workers? 21 4.8 The negotiations 23 How will Gibraltar’s interests be represented in the negotiations? 23 Different provisions for Gibraltar? 25 Future relations agreement 26 EU support for Spain? 26 Could Gibraltar be a bargaining chip? 27 3 Commons Library Briefing, 2 May 2017 Contributing Authors: Daniel Harari, Djuna Thurley Attribution: EU flag, British flag and Palace of Westminster – CC0 Public domain: no attribution required.
    [Show full text]