DOCSLIB.ORG

Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS Draft Recreation Affected Environment Report Don R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS Draft Recreation Affected Environment Report Don R Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS Draft Recreation Affected Environment Report Don R. Sullivan November 6, 2012 Introduction The area surrounding the Salt River Canyon, the Salt River Canyon Wilderness, and the Sierra Ancha Wilderness, offer recreation settings that are scarce and unique in the arid southwest. Perennial water that supports vegetation and wildlife, and a remote, wild, non-motorized setting characterize much of the Salt River Canyon area. The Wild and Scenic River Study Report and Environmental Impact Statement for the Salt River recommended “wild designation of 22 miles of the Salt River as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System”. This segment of river, from Lower Corral Canyon to the Highway 288 Bridge, remains eligible for inclusion in the NWSR system. Recreationists come to the Salt River Canyon area for a wide variety of recreation opportunities including whitewater rafting, kayaking, canoeing, swimming, fishing, hiking, camping, horseback riding, mountain biking, picnicking, wildlife viewing, hunting, target shooting, Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) use, and scenic driving. Additional characteristics that add value to this recreation setting include challenging river rapids, spectacular scenery, dramatic geology, natural salt deposits, archaeological sites, lush stream and river vegetation, and perennial side streams. The 32,100 acres of land that comprise the Salt River Canyon Wilderness were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System in 1984. Although backpackers sometimes access the river by hiking down side creeks, there are no system trails in the Salt River Canyon Wilderness, so recreational access is primarily accomplished by whitewater boating. The 20,850 acres of land that comprise the Sierra Ancha Wilderness were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System in 1964. Access to the Sierra Ancha Wilderness is primarily by foot or horseback through one of thirteen trailheads. Recreational River Running The Upper Salt River is an undammed, free-flowing whitewater river. As such, its water level is entirely dependent upon the annual rainfall and snowpack in its basin, located in the White Mountains of Arizona. Water levels can drop below 100 cubic feet per second (cfs) in summer and have risen as high as 143,000 cfs at flood stage. Recreational river running typically occurs in the spring, at water levels ranging between 500 cfs and 10,000 cfs, with some additional use in summer monsoon season. The rafting portion of the Upper Salt River runs 52 miles from the put-in near the Highway 60 Bridge to the take-out at the Highway 288 Bridge. Administratively, this is broken up into three Segments; the 9-mile Salt Banks segment, the 11-mile Gleason segment, and the 32-mile Wilderness segment. The Forest Service co-manages the Upper Salt River with the White Mountain Apache Tribe, whose tribal lands on the north side of the river extend 28.9 miles below the Highway 60 put-in. The Forest Service issues permits to four commercial outfitters for the Upper Salt River. The outfitter’s clients are from all over the United States, with the majority coming from the four corners region. These small businesses book half-day, full-day, or overnight trips on the Salt Banks and Gleason segments, or three to five day trips for the entire length of river. Bookings vary yearly with the snowpack and water level. In 2010, a year with normal snowpack, the outfitters sold 8,098 user days (one person on the river for one day), grossing a total of $774,935. From March 1 to May 15 the Forest Service requires a permit for private boaters (people with their own boats who wish to organize their own trips) to boat through the Salt River Canyon Wilderness. Private boaters may pay the $10 application fee to be included in the yearly random drawing for special recreation permits. There are four of these permits available, for trips of up to fifteen people, for each of the 76 days of the permitted season, or 304 available permits. There is a onetime fee of $125 for each permit. In 2010, 1,792 people applied, and 282 permits were issued, to boat through the Salt River Canyon Wilderness, generating $53,170 in permit fees. Private boaters also conduct day and overnight trips on the Salt Banks and Gleason sections where no Forest Service permit is required. Private boater application data shows that boaters come from as far away as Massachusetts and Alaska. Most applicants are from urban areas, and are from the southwest. Sizable populations from the Northwest, California, and Texas also apply. While it is known that, through spending on gas, food, lodging and other items, river recreationists contribute to local jobs and revenue, no study has been conducted to determine the amount of revenue that boaters provide to the communities near the Upper Salt River. Given that almost all of the commercial and private boaters are from outside the Globe/Miami area, it is likely that boating on the Upper Salt River is this local community’s largest source of ecotourism. Commercial and private boaters on the Upper Salt River must practice leave no trace camping and have a number of special regulations that they must follow, abbreviated in the table below. These include containing their fires in a firepan so as not to leave a mark on the beach and carrying and using a human waste removal system. Upper Salt River Regulations Abbreviated Regulation Segment CFR Boating permit required March 1 to May 15 Wilderness 36 CFR 261.57(a) Must remove human solid waste Salt Banks, Gleason, Wilderness 36 CFR 261.57(g) Upper Salt River Regulations Abbreviated Regulation Segment CFR No wheeled vehicles Wilderness 36 CFR 261.57(h) Group size of 15 or less Wilderness 36 CFR 261.58(f) Group size of 25 or less Salt Banks, Gleason 36 CFR 261.58(f) No camping at Walnut Falls Gleason 36 CFR 261.58(e) Campfire must be contained in firepan Salt Banks, Gleason, Wilderness 36 CFR 261.52(a) Indigenous plants dead and down only Salt Banks, Gleason, Wilderness 36 CFR 261.58(t) No littering Salt Banks, Gleason, Wilderness 36 CFR 261.57(g) Other Recreational Use Road and trail access is a key factor that determines amount and type of non-river- running recreation use along the Upper Salt River Canyon area. OHV use, horseback riding, mountain biking, fishing, swimming, hiking, camping, picnicking, wildlife viewing, bird watching, hunting, target shooting, and scenic driving primarily take place where forest roads and trails provide access. Scenic Driving / Mountain Biking / OHV Use: The area surrounding the Salt River Canyon offers a variety of views of some of the most beautiful scenery in the Southwestern United States. Views range from the pine forests of the Timber Camp and Sierra Ancha Mountains, to Saguaro laden vistas of the Sonoran Desert. Vehicles used for scenic driving vary with the terrain, and range from passenger cars to dirt and mountain bikes. District recreation personnel report that OHV scenic driving is the most common recreational use in the uplands of the analysis area, and is often combined with other recreational uses like hunting, Target shooting, fishing and picnicking. Hunting / Fishing: Hunting and fishing are year-round activities in the analysis area. Not surprisingly, hunting increases in the seasons permitted for taking large game. Fishing on the Upper Salt River is primarily for Catfish and initiates at vehicle access points like Horseshoe Bend and Gleason Flat. Horseback Riding: While much of the horseback riding in the analysis area emanates from the Timber Camp Equestrian Site (see below), the trailheads of the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and forest roads like the Horseshoe Bend Road (FR 219) and the Gleason Flat Road (FR 303) are also launching off points for equestrians. Hiking: Most of the hiking in the analysis area takes place in the Sierra Ancha Wilderness. While there are no trails in, or leading into, the Salt River Canyon Wilderness, people occasionally hike down side canyons like Cherry Creek or Coon Creek. Wildlife Viewing / Bird Watching: Due to its close proximity to the high elevation Mogollon Rim and Sierra Ancha Mountains, and low elevation deserts surrounding the Upper Salt River, there is a great range of available birds and wildlife to view in the area surrounding the Upper Salt River. Much of this activity happens from forest roads in combination with scenic driving. Developed Recreation Areas There are three developed recreation areas in the analysis area; Timber Camp Recreation Area, Jones Water Recreation Area, and Bull Canyon Trailhead. Timber Camp Recreation Area is a heavily used campground located 26 miles east of Globe Arizona on the north side of Highway 60. It is broken into 4 separate sites, all of which are fenced off from the surrounding grazing allotment. Timber Camp Equestrian Site and Brundrett Site 1 are available for use by reservation. Brundrett Site 2 and Timber Camp Day Use Picnic Area are open year-round. o Timber Camp Equestrian Site: With a large parking area to accommodate horse trailers, this site has three corrals, two hitching posts, two manure receptacles, a concrete vault toilet, a fire ring, and a ramada that shelters six picnic tables. o Brundrett Site 1: Brundrett Site 1 has two ramadas (each with six picnic tables) and a fire ring. It has three concrete vault toilets available for use from the fourteen campsites, each with a picnic table and fire ring. o Brundrett Site 2: Brundrett Site 2 has a parking area for large groups and three day use picnic tables. It has a concrete vault toilet available for use from three campsites, each with a picnic table and fire ring.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Delisting of Agave Arizonica
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 35195 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Weber described this species in the eastern Pinal County, and northeastern ‘‘Cactus and Succulent Journal’’ in 1970 Pima County. Agave toumeyana ssp. Fish and Wildlife Service (Gentry and Weber 1970). This bella is restricted to the eastern slope of perennial succulent has leaves growing the Bradshaw Mountains in eastern 50 CFR Part 17 from the base in a small basal rosette Yavapai to northwestern and central to RIN 1018–AI79 (i.e., an arrangement of leaves radiating southern Gila County, and northeastern from a crown or center), and is Maricopa to northern Pinal County. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife approximately 20–35 centimeters (cm) A comparison of plant characters and Plants; Delisting of Agave (8–14 inches (in)) high and 30–40 cm showed Agave arizonica to be arizonica (Arizona agave) From the (12–16 in) wide. The leaves are dark intermediate to the other two agave Federal List of Endangered and green with a reddish-brown to light gray species with which it is always found in Threatened Wildlife and Plants border extending nearly to the base, association (DeLamater and Hodgson approximately 13–31 cm (5–12 in) long 1986). Pinkava and Baker (1985) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, and 2–3 cm (1 in) wide. The slender, suggested that plants recognized as Interior. branched flowering stalk is 2.5–4 meters Agave arizonica may be the result of ACTION: Final rule. (m) (8.2–13 feet (ft)) tall with urn- continuing production of hybrid shaped flowers 25–32 millimeters (mm) individuals rather than a distinct SUMMARY: We, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Council Oa Where to Go Camping Guide
    GRAND CANYON COUNCIL OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents Introduction to The Order of the Arrow ....................................................................... 1 Wipala Wiki, The Man .................................................................................................. 1 General Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Desert Survival Safety Tips ........................................................................................... 4 Further Information ....................................................................................................... 4 Contact Agencies and Organizations ............................................................................. 5 National Forests ............................................................................................................. 5 U. S. Department Of The Interior - Bureau Of Land Management ................................ 7 Maricopa County Parks And Recreation System: .......................................................... 8 Arizona State Parks: .................................................................................................... 10 National Parks & National Monuments: ...................................................................... 11 Tribal Jurisdictions: ..................................................................................................... 13 On the Road: National
    [Show full text]
  • History of Watershed Research in the Central Arizona Highlands
    Beginning of Water Studies in the Central Arizona Highlands Gottfried, DeBano, and Baker Chapter 2 Beginning of Water Studies in the Central Arizona Highlands Gerald J. Gottfried, Leonard F. DeBano, and Malchus B. Baker, Jr. government under the National Reclamation Act to build a dam on the Salt River below the confluence with Tonto Introduction Creek. The Roosevelt Dam, the first of 6 dams on the Salt and Verde Rivers, was completed in 1911. Water has been recognized as an important resource in In the early 20th century, watershed managers became central Arizona and has affected populations occupying concerned that erosion on the adjacent and headwater the Salt River Valley for centuries. Water related activities watersheds of the Salt River would move sediment into have been documented since about 200 before the com- the newly constructed Roosevelt Reservoir and decrease mon era, when Hohokam Indians settled the Valley and its capacity. Measurements indicated that 101,000 acre-ft constructed canals to irrigate their fields. Europeans be- of coarse granitic sediments had accumulated behind gan to settle in the Phoenix area in the late 1860s and Roosevelt Dam between 1909 and 1925. The Summit Plots, depended on irrigation water from the Salt River for located between Globe, Arizona and Lake Roosevelt, were agriculture. However, water supplies fluctuated greatly established in 1925 by the USDA Forest Service 15 mi because the river often flooded in winter and dried up in upstream from Roosevelt Dam to study the effects of the summer. There were no impoundments to store water vegetation recovery, mechanical stabilization, and cover for the dry seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona by Robert S. Leighty and 1Stephen D. Holloway Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-21 November, 1998 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 25-page text and 1:24,000 scale geologic map. I Department o/Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1404 This report was supported by the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, with funds provided by the Us. Environmental Protection Agency through the State Indoor Radon Grant Program, the us. Geological Survey via the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs, Arizona State University, and the Arizona Geological Survey. This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The New River SE 7.S-minute Quadrangle is located in the northern fringe of the Phoenix metropolitan area and is bordered by Biscuit Flat to the west, the Union Hills to the south, Paradise Valley to the southeast, and the New River and New River Mesa areas to the north (Figure 1). The quadrangle is bounded by latitudes 33°4S'00"N and 33°S2'30''N, and longitudes 112°00'00"W and 112°07'30"W. Given its location, the area has become highly urbanized during the last few decades and is still undergoing rapid population growth. Thus, the knowledge of the distribution and character of bedrock and surficial deposits is important to make informed decisions concerning management of the land and its resources. Geologic mapping of the New River SE Quadrangle is related to other 1:24,000 scale mapping projects of the Arizona Geological Survey in and around the Phoenix metropolitan area (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Pine-Oak Woodland in Southern Arizona and Adjacent Mexico
    . COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA NUMBER 32 Birds of Pine-Oak Woodland in Southern Arizona and Adjacent Mexico , BY JOE T. M-HALL, JR. BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY March 15,1957 COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA NUMBER 32 Birds of Pine-Oak Woodland in Southern Arizona and Adjacent Mexico BY JOE T. MARSHALL, JR. BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY March 15, 1957 SPOTTED SCREECH OWL 011:\‘ 7RIcllol‘ SI.$’ Edited by ALDEN H. MILLER and FRANK A. PITELKA at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of California, Berkeley NOTE The publications of the Cooper Ornithological Society consist of two series--The Condor, a bimonthly journal, and the Pacific Coast Avifauna, for the accommodation of papers the length of which pro- hibits their appearance in The Condor. For information as to either series, addressC. V. Duff, Business Manager, 2911 Antelo View Drive, Los Angeles 24, California, or Thomas R. Howell, Assistant Business Manager, Department of Zoology, University of California, Los An- geles, California. The Society wishes to acknowledge the generous aid given in the publication of Avifauna Number 32 by the artist, Don R. Eckelberry, and by an anonymous donor who financed the color plate. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . 5 Acknowledgments _...................................................,.................. 8 Flora ._.................................................................................................. 9 Description of camps_____ _..... _.._...._.._ .____ ._.._........._..,........................ 15 Northeastern group ____..___..__.__.. ..__.._.._. _._.__._...___..____............, 15 Southwestern group 2 2 Vegetation __~..~____.._.._...... .._................................................ 31 Spatial relations ___..___.____ ._.._ . .._......._.._..................................3 1 Classification of pine-oak woodland 35 Heterogeneity of pine-oak woodland ___________....._.__..____.._____.__...
    [Show full text]
  • Tales from the Chiricahua Mountains As, Told
    Chiricaftua nountains Research. Symposium PROCEEDINGS Editors Andrew M. Barton and Sarah A. Sloane Pine Canyon United Methodist Camp Chiricahua Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona 16-17 March 1992 Sponsored by: National Park Service, USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Research Station of the American Museum of Natural History, and the Nature Conservancy Organizers Richard L. Anderson, Chiricahua National Monument, United States Park Service, Dos Cabezas Route Box 6500, Willcox, AZ 85643 Andrew M. Barton, Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 J. Carrie Brown, Douglas District, Coronado National Forest, USDA Forest Service, RR#1, P.O. Box 228R, Douglas, AZ 85607 Sarah A. Sloane, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Wade Sherbrooke, Southwestern Research Station, Portal, AZ 85632 Jeanne Wade, Douglas District, Coronado National Forest, USDA Forest Service, RR#1, P.O. Box 228R, Douglas, AZ 85607 Published by: Southwest Parks and Monuments Association 221 North Court Tucson, AZ 85701 December 1992 PREFACE The Proceedings presented here are from the Chiricahua Mountains Research Symposium held from 16-17 March 1992 at the Pine Canyon United Methodist Camp in the Chiricahua Mountains. The primary purpose of the symposium was to provide a multidisciplinary forum for information exchange and discussion regarding natural science (biology, geology, environmental studies) research in the Chiricahua Mountains. Oral presentations were invited from all scientists carrying out such research or its application to management in the Chiricahua Mountains and surrounding basins. Several presentations, including the evening address by Jerram Brown, were solicited by the symposium organizers. The papers included in this volume are based on presentations given at the symposium and are primarily summaries of research to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(S): T
    Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Arizona Localities of Interest to Botanists Author(s): T. H. Kearney Source: Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Oct., 1964), pp. 94-103 Published by: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40022366 Accessed: 21/05/2010 20:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=anas. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science. http://www.jstor.org ARIZONA LOCALITIESOF INTEREST TO BOTANISTS Compiled by T.
    [Show full text]
  • Lies on the Western Slope of the Sierra Ancha from South Fork Was 78 Cubic Feet Per Second (Cfs), Mountains
    Post-Wildfire Peakflows in Arizona Montane Forests: Some Case Studies Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Neary, Daniel G.; Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J. Publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest Rights Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Download date 30/09/2021 10:12:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/296603 POST -WILDFIRE PEAKFLOWS IN ARIZONA MONTANE FORESTS: SOME CASE STUDIES Daniel G. Neary,1 Peter F. Ffolliott,2 and Gerald J. Gottfried3 SOUTH FORK OF WORKMAN CREEK summer storms measured on the Workman Creek A fire that was started by lightning on July 6, watersheds up to that time of record. The rainfall 1957, burned 60 acres of the ponderosa pine forest recorded in two gages located inside the burned on the upper part of South Fork, one of the three area was 3.50 and 4.05 inches, respectively, with a Workman Creek watersheds north of Rooseveltpeak intensity exceeding 2 inches per hour mid- Lake, about 50 miles north of Globe. South Forkway through the storm. The resulting peakflow lies on the western slope of the Sierra Ancha from South Fork was 78 cubic feet per second (cfs), Mountains. The steepest slopes on the 316 ac which was 2.1 times that of the highest previously watershed are situated on northerly aspects above measured peakflow on the watershed (Rich 1962). the control section. The underlying rock formation The duration of this initial post -fire peakflow was is quartzite overlaid by sandstone. Soil depths vary relatively short, however, with the recession from a few inches to more than 15 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geologic Evolution of the Colorado Plateau
    Geological Society of America 3300 Penrose Place P.O. Box 9140 Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 357-1000 • fax 303-357-1073 www.geosociety.org This PDF file is subject to the following conditions and restrictions: Copyright © 2009, The Geological Society of America, Inc. (GSA). All rights reserved. Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in other subsequent works and to make unlimited copies for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. For any other use, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA, fax 303-357-1073, [email protected]. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. This file may not be posted on the Internet. The Geological Society of America Memoir 204 2009 Structural geologic evolution of the Colorado Plateau George H. Davis Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Alex P. Bump BP Exploration and Production Technology, Houston, Texas 77079, USA ABSTRACT The Colorado Plateau is composed of Neoproterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks overlying mechanically heterogeneous latest Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic crystalline basement containing shear zones. The structure of the plateau is dominated by ten major basement-cored uplifts and associated mono- clines, which were constructed during the Late Cretaceous through early Tertiary Laramide orogeny.
    [Show full text]